SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (Backup Server), version 16.0, does not perform the necessary validation checks for an authenticated user while executing DUMP or LOAD command allowing arbitrary code execution or Code Injection.

SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java (User Management Engine), versions- 7.10, 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50; does not sufficiently validate the LDAP data source configuration XML document accepted from an untrusted source, leading to Missing XML Validation.

The software logistics system of SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP and ABAP Platform versions - 700, 701, 702, 710, 730, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, enables a malicious user to transfer ABAP code artifacts or content, by-passing the established quality gates. By this vulnerability malicious code can reach quality and production, and can compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system and its data.

Banking services from SAP 9.0 (FSAPPL version 5) and SAP S/4HANA Financial Products Subledger (S4FPSL, version 1) performs an inadequate authorization check for an authenticated user, potentially resulting in escalation of privileges.

SAP Kernel (ABAP Debugger), versions KRNL32NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL32UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL64NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, KRNL64UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.73, KERNEL 7.21, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, 7.75, 7.76, 7.77, allows a user to execute “Go to statement” without possessing the authorization S_DEVELOP DEBUG 02, resulting in Missing Authorization Check

Under certain conditions, it is possible to request the modification of role or privilege assignments through SAP Identity Management REST Interface Version 2, which would otherwise be restricted only for viewing.

ABAP BASIS function modules INST_CREATE_R3_RFC_DEST, INST_CREATE_TCPIP_RFCDEST, and INST_CREATE_TCPIP_RFC_DEST in SAP BASIS (fixed in versions 7.0 to 7.02, 7.10 to 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50 to 7.53) do not perform necessary authorization checks in all circumstances for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

The OS Command Plugin in the transaction GPA_ADMIN and the OSCommand Console of SAP Diagnostic Agent (LM-Service), version 7.2, allow an attacker to inject code that can be executed by the application. An attacker could thereby control the behavior of the application.

The session cookie used by SAP Enable Now, version 1902, does not have the HttpOnly flag set. If an attacker runs script code in the context of the application, he could get access to the session cookie. The session cookie could then be abused to gain access to the application.

Customizing functionality of SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP Platform (fixed in versions from 7.0 to 7.02, from 7.10 to 7.11, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, from 7.50 to 7.53, from 7.74 to 7.75) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

Order processing in SAP ERP Sales (corrected in SAP_APPL 6.0, 6.02, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18) and S4HANA Sales (corrected in S4CORE 1.0, 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04) does not execute the required authorization checks for an authenticated user, which can result in an escalation of privileges.

Transaction Management in SAP Treasury and Risk Management (corrected in S4CORE versions 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04 and EA-FINSERV versions 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 8.0) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

SAP Commerce Cloud (Mediaconversion Extension), versions 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 1808, 1811, 1905, allows an authenticated Backoffice/HMC user to inject code that can be executed by the application, leading to Code Injection. An attacker could thereby control the behavior of the application.

SAP NetWeaver for Java Application Server - Web Container, (engineapi, versions 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.31, 7.4 and 7.5), (servercode, versions 7.2, 7.3, 7.31, 7.4, 7.5), allows an attacker to upload files (including script files) without proper file format validation.

SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.01, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the SAP NetWeaver UDDI Server (Services Registry), versions 7.10, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50. Because of this, an attacker can exploit Services Registry potentially enabling them to take complete control of the product, including viewing, changing, or deleting data by injecting code into the working memory which is subsequently executed by the application. It can also be used to cause a general fault in the product, causing the product to terminate.

Under some circumstances, masterdata maintenance in SAP BW/4HANA (fixed in DW4CORE version 1.0 (SP08)) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

An administrator of SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java (J2EE-Framework), (corrected in versions 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.31, 7.4, 7.5), may change privileges for all or some functions in Java Server, and enable users to execute functions, they are not allowed to execute otherwise.

Transaction Management in SAP Treasury and Risk Management (corrected in S4CORE versions 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04 and EA-FINSERV versions 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 8.0) does not perform necessary authorization checks for functionalities that require user identity.

ABAP Server of SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform fail to perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This has been corrected in the following versions: KRNL32NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL32UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL64NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.74, KRNL64UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.73, 7.74, 8.04, KERNEL 7.21, 7.45, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, 7.74, 7.75, 8.04.

SAP NetWeaver Guided Procedures (Administration Workset), versions - 7.10, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. The impact of missing authorization could result to abuse of functionality restricted to a particular user group, and could allow unauthorized users to read, modify or delete restricted data.

SAP Commerce, versions - 1808, 1811, 1905, 2005, 2011, Backoffice application allows certain authorized users to create source rules which are translated to drools rule when published to certain modules within the application. An attacker with this authorization can inject malicious code in the source rules and perform remote code execution enabling them to compromise the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application.

SAP Business One, version - 10.0, allows an attacker with business authorization to upload any files (including script files) without the proper file format validation.

The Service Layer of SAP Business One, version - 10.0, allows an authenticated attacker to invoke certain functions that would otherwise be restricted to specific users. For an attacker to discover the vulnerable function, no in-depth system knowledge is required. Once exploited via Network stack, the attacker may be able to read, modify or delete restricted data. The impact is that missing authorization can result of abuse of functionality usually restricted to specific users.

The BW Database Interface allows an attacker with low privileges to execute any crafted database queries, exposing the backend database. An attacker can include their own SQL commands which the database will execute without properly sanitizing the untrusted data leading to SQL injection vulnerability which can fully compromise the affected SAP system.

SAP Business Warehouse, versions 700, 701, 702, 711, 730, 731, 740, 750, 782 and SAP BW/4HANA, versions 100, 200, allow a low privileged attacker to inject code using a remote enabled function module over the network. Via the function module an attacker can create a malicious ABAP report which could be used to get access to sensitive data, to inject malicious UPDATE statements that could have also impact on the operating system, to disrupt the functionality of the SAP system which can thereby lead to a Denial of Service.

The ISHMED-PATRED_TRANSACT_RFCCALL function in the IS-H Industry-Specific Component Hospital subsystem in SAP Healthcare Industry Solution, and the SAP ERP central component (aka ECC 6), allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended transaction restrictions via unspecified vectors.

SAP MaxDB (liveCache), versions 7.8 and 7.9, allows an attacker who gets DBM operator privileges to execute crafted database queries and therefore read, modify or delete sensitive data from database.

Improper session management when using SAP Cloud Platform 2.0 (Connectivity Service and Cloud Connector). Under certain conditions, data of some other user may be shown or modified when using an application built on top of SAP Cloud Platform.

Executing transaction WRCK in SAP R/3 Enterprise Retail (EHP6) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

Missing authorization check in SAP HCM Fiori "People Profile" (GBX01 HR version 6.0) for an authenticated user which may result in an escalation of privileges.

ABAP File Interface in, SAP BASIS, from 7.00 to 7.02, from 7.10 to 7.11, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, from 7.50 to 7.52, allows an attacker to exploit insufficient validation of path information provided by users, thus characters representing "traverse to parent directory" are passed through to the file APIs.

SAP Enterprise Financial Services, versions 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 8.0 (in business function EAFS_BCA_BUSOPR_SEPA) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

In SAP Solution Manager 7.20, the role SAP_BPO_CONFIG gives the Business Process Operations (BPO) configuration user more authorization than required for configuring the BPO tools.

SAP ERP Financials Information System (SAP_APPL 6.00, 6.02, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16; SAP_FIN 6.17, 6.18, 7.00, 7.20, 7.30 S4CORE 1.00, 1.01, 1.02) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

Under certain conditions a malicious user may retrieve information on SAP Internet Graphic Server (IGS), 7.20, 7.20EXT, 7.45, 7.49, 7.53, overwrite existing image or corrupt other type of files.

SAP Disclosure Management 10.1 does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Suite, versions 4.10 and 4.20, and SAP Crystal Reports (version for Visual Studio .NET, Version 2010) allows an attacker to inject code that can be executed by the application. An attacker could thereby control the behaviour of the application.

SAP Enterprise Financial Services, versions 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 8.0 (in business function EAFS_BCA_BUSOPR_2) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

An attacker can use specially crafted inputs to execute commands on the host of a TREX / BWA installation, SAP Basis, versions: 7.0 to 7.02, 7.10 to 7.11, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40 and 7.50 to 7.53. Not all commands are possible, only those that can be executed by the <sid>adm user. The commands executed depend upon the privileges of the <sid>adm user.

Knowledge Management (XMLForms) in SAP NetWeaver, versions 7.30, 7.31, 7.40 and 7.50 does not sufficiently validate an XML document accepted from an untrusted source.

Necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges, have been fixed in SAP Basis AS ABAP of SAP NetWeaver 700 to 750, from 750 onwards delivered as ABAP Platform.

SAP Enterprise Financial Services (fixed in SAPSCORE 1.13, 1.14, 1.15; S4CORE 1.01, 1.02, 1.03; EA-FINSERV 1.10, 2.0, 5.0, 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 8.0; Bank/CFM 4.63_20) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

SAP Disclosure Management 10.1 does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

A Remote Code Execution vulnerability exists in the SAP NetWeaver (ABAP Server, up to release 7.40) and ABAP Platform (> release 7.40).Because of this, an attacker can exploit these products via Code Injection, and potentially enabling to take complete control of the products, including viewing, changing, or deleting data by injecting code into the working memory which is subsequently executed by the application. It can also be used to cause a general fault in the product, causing the products to terminate.

SAP Business Objects Business Intelligence Platform (CrystalReports WebForm Viewer), versions 4.1, 4.2, and Crystal Reports for VS version 2010, allows an attacker with basic authorization to perform deserialization attack in the application, leading to service interruptions and denial of service and unauthorized execution of arbitrary commands, leading to Deserialization of Untrusted Data.

SAP Host Agent, version 7.21, allows an attacker with admin privileges to use the operation framework to gain root privileges over the underlying operating system, leading to Privilege Escalation.

SAP NetWeaver (ABAP Server) and ABAP Platform, versions - 700, 701, 702, 710, 711, 730, 731, 740, 750, 751, 753, 755, allows an attacker to inject code that can be executed by the application, leading to Code Injection. An attacker could thereby control the behavior of the application.

SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (LCM) - versions 420, 430, allows an attacker with an admin privilege to read and decrypt LCMBIAR file's password under certain conditions, enabling the attacker to modify the password or import the file into another system causing high impact on confidentiality but a limited impact on the availability and integrity of the application.

SAP Business One client - version 10.0 allows an attacker with low privileges, to inject code that can be executed by the application. An attacker could thereby control the behavior of the application.