Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2020-14039

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-17 Jul, 2020 | 15:43
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:32
Rejected At-
Credits

In Go before 1.13.13 and 1.14.x before 1.14.5, Certificate.Verify may lack a check on the VerifyOptions.KeyUsages EKU requirements (if VerifyOptions.Roots equals nil and the installation is on Windows). Thus, X.509 certificate verification is incomplete.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:17 Jul, 2020 | 15:43
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 12:32
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

In Go before 1.13.13 and 1.14.x before 1.14.5, Certificate.Verify may lack a check on the VerifyOptions.KeyUsages EKU requirements (if VerifyOptions.Roots equals nil and the installation is on Windows). Thus, X.509 certificate verification is incomplete.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/golang-announce
x_refsource_MISC
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00077.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00082.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00029.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00030.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
x_refsource_MISC
https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/golang-announce/XZNfaiwgt2w
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200731-0005/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/golang-announce
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00077.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00082.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00029.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00030.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
Hyperlink: https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/golang-announce/XZNfaiwgt2w
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200731-0005/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/golang-announce
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00077.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00082.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00029.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00030.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/golang-announce/XZNfaiwgt2w
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200731-0005/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/golang-announce
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00077.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00082.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00029.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00030.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/golang-announce/XZNfaiwgt2w
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200731-0005/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:17 Jul, 2020 | 16:15
Updated At:07 Nov, 2023 | 03:17

In Go before 1.13.13 and 1.14.x before 1.14.5, Certificate.Verify may lack a check on the VerifyOptions.KeyUsages EKU requirements (if VerifyOptions.Roots equals nil and the installation is on Windows). Thus, X.509 certificate verification is incomplete.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

Go
golang
>>go>>Versions before 1.13.13(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Go
golang
>>go>>Versions from 1.14.0(inclusive) to 1.14.5(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
openSUSE
opensuse
>>leap>>15.1
cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:leap:15.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
openSUSE
opensuse
>>leap>>15.2
cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:leap:15.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00077.htmlcve@mitre.org
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00082.htmlcve@mitre.org
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00029.htmlcve@mitre.org
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00030.htmlcve@mitre.org
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/golang-announcecve@mitre.org
N/A
https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/golang-announce/XZNfaiwgt2wcve@mitre.org
N/A
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200731-0005/cve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.htmlcve@mitre.org
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00077.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00082.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00029.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00030.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/golang-announce
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/golang-announce/XZNfaiwgt2w
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200731-0005/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

175Records found

CVE-2019-19271
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.53% / 66.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Nov, 2019 | 03:33
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD before 1.3.6. A wrong iteration variable, used when checking a client certificate against CRL entries (installed by a system administrator), can cause some CRL entries to be ignored, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proftpdn/a
Product-proftpdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16281
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 47.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Dec, 2020 | 20:12
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Ptarmigan before 0.2.3 lacks API token validation, e.g., an "if (token === apiToken) {return true;} return false;" code block.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ptarmigan_projectn/a
Product-ptarmigann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11727
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 32.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jul, 2019 | 13:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists where it possible to force Network Security Services (NSS) to sign CertificateVerify with PKCS#1 v1.5 signatures when those are the only ones advertised by server in CertificateRequest in TLS 1.3. PKCS#1 v1.5 signatures should not be used for TLS 1.3 messages. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 68.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Mozilla Corporation
Product-firefoxFirefox
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1006
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-3.04% / 86.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jul, 2019 | 18:56
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 18:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Windows Identity Foundation (WIF), allowing signing of SAML tokens with arbitrary symmetric keys, aka 'WCF/WIF SAML Token Authentication Bypass Vulnerability'.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016sharepoint_foundationwindows_server_2012windows_8.1windows_rt_8.1identitymodelwindows_7sharepoint_serversharepoint_enterprise_serverwindows_10.net_frameworkwindows_server_2019windows_server_2008WindowsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 R2Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1709 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1803 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.6Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 8.1 for 32-bit systemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1703 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1803 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Microsoft.IdentityModelMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.6/4.6.1/4.6.2/4.7/4.7.1/4.7.2Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)Windows ServerMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise ServerMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows RT 8.1Microsoft SharePoint ServerMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.6/4.6.1/4.6.2Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2016Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 8.1 for x64-based systemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.5.2Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows Server 2019Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows Server 2019Microsoft SharePoint FoundationMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5.1Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server, version 1803 (Server Core Installation)Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1703 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-0129
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.74% / 81.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2017 | 00:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Microsoft Lync for Mac 2011 fails to properly validate certificates, allowing remote attackers to alter server-client communications, aka "Microsoft Lync for Mac Certificate Validation Vulnerability."

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-lync_for_macLync for Mac
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-0248
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.09% / 77.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2 and 4.7 allow an attacker to bypass Enhanced Security Usage taggings when they present a certificate that is invalid for a specific use, aka ".NET Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability."

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-.net_frameworkMicrosoft .NET Framework
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-15042
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.00% / 0.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Oct, 2019 | 16:41
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in JetBrains TeamCity 2018.2.4. It had no SSL certificate validation for some external https connections. This was fixed in TeamCity 2019.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-teamcityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-7662
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Feb, 2017 | 08:35
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. iOS before 10.2 is affected. macOS before 10.12.2 is affected. watchOS before 3.1.3 is affected. The issue involves the "Security" component, which allows remote attackers to spoof certificates via unspecified vectors.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_oswatchosmac_os_xn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16179
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Sep, 2019 | 20:36
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Limesurvey before 3.17.14 does not enforce SSL/TLS usage in the default configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-limesurveyn/a
Product-limesurveyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-6517
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2019 | 19:14
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 06:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Prior to version 0.3.0, chloride's use of net-ssh resulted in host fingerprints for previously unknown hosts getting added to the user's known_hosts file without confirmation. In version 0.3.0 this is updated so that the user's known_hosts file is not updated by chloride.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Perforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-chlorideChloride
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-4436
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2019 | 17:43
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 05:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A certificate validation issue existed in configuration profiles. This was addressed with additional checks. This issue affected versions prior to iOS 12.1.1, tvOS 12.1.1, watchOS 5.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_oswatchostvosiOS, tvOS, watchOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-8231
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Lenovo Group Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Lenovo Group Ltd.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 29.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jun, 2017 | 00:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Lenovo Service Bridge before version 4, a bug found in the signature verification logic of the code signing certificate could be exploited by an attacker to insert a forged code signing certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Lenovo Group Limited
Product-lenovo_service_bridgeService Bridge
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-32574
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.22% / 78.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jul, 2021 | 17:28
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise 1.3.0 through 1.10.0 Envoy proxy TLS configuration does not validate destination service identity in the encoded subject alternative name. Fixed in 1.8.14, 1.9.8, and 1.10.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-consuln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-22943
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 44.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Feb, 2023 | 17:22
Updated-28 Feb, 2025 | 11:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Modular Input REST API Requests Connect via HTTP after Certificate Validation Failure in Splunk Add-on Builder and Splunk CloudConnect SDK

In Splunk Add-on Builder (AoB) versions below 4.1.2 and the Splunk CloudConnect SDK versions below 3.1.3, requests to third-party APIs through the REST API Modular Input incorrectly revert to using HTTP to connect after a failure to connect over HTTPS occurs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-add-on_buildercloudconnect_software_development_kitSplunk Add-on BuilderSplunk CloudConnect SDK
CWE ID-CWE-636
Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25636
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect trust validation of signature with ambiguous KeyInfo children

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationFedora Project
Product-fedoralibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-20245
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2019 | 17:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The LDAP auth backend (airflow.contrib.auth.backends.ldap_auth) prior to Apache Airflow 1.10.1 was misconfigured and contained improper checking of exceptions which disabled server certificate checking.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-airflowApache Airflow
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-0465
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 55.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Mar, 2023 | 14:30
Updated-18 Feb, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored

Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks. Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-0466
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.51% / 65.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Mar, 2023 | 14:30
Updated-19 Feb, 2025 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate policy check not enabled

The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented to implicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificate verification. However the implementation of the function does not enable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrect policies to pass the certificate verification. As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it was decided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() function. Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificate policy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitly enable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() with the X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument. Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are not commonly used by applications.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-17612
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.01% / 76.16%
||
7 Day CHG-0.02%
Published-09 Nov, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Sennheiser HeadSetup 7.3.4903 places Certification Authority (CA) certificates into the Trusted Root CA store of the local system, and publishes the private key in the SennComCCKey.pem file within the public software distribution, which allows remote attackers to spoof arbitrary web sites or software publishers for several years, even if the HeadSetup product is uninstalled. NOTE: a vulnerability-assessment approach must check all Windows systems for CA certificates with a CN of 127.0.0.1 or SennComRootCA, and determine whether those certificates are unwanted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sennheisern/aMicrosoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016windows_server_2012windows_8.1headsetupwindows_rt_8.1windows_7windows_10windows_server_2019windows_server_2008n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-39312
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 53.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jul, 2024 | 16:30
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 14:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Botan has an Authorization Error due to Name Constraint Decoding Bug

Botan is a C++ cryptography library. X.509 certificates can identify elliptic curves using either an object identifier or using explicit encoding of the parameters. A bug in the parsing of name constraint extensions in X.509 certificates meant that if the extension included both permitted subtrees and excluded subtrees, only the permitted subtree would be checked. If a certificate included a name which was permitted by the permitted subtree but also excluded by excluded subtree, it would be accepted. Fixed in versions 3.5.0 and 2.19.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-botan_projectrandombitrandombit
Product-botanbotanbotan
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36478
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 48.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). A NULL algorithm parameters entry looks identical to an array of REAL (size zero) and thus the certificate is considered valid. However, if the parameters do not match in any way, then the certificate should be considered invalid.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm LimitedDebian GNU/LinuxSiemens AG
Product-debian_linuxlogo\!_cmr2040_firmwaresimatic_rtu3031c_firmwaresimatic_rtu3030csimatic_rtu3041c_firmwaresimatic_rtu3041clogo\!_cmr2040simatic_rtu3000clogo\!_cmr2020simatic_rtu3031csimatic_rtu3000c_firmwarelogo\!_cmr2020_firmwaresimatic_rtu3030c_firmwarembed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-48437
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Apr, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-10 Feb, 2025 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in x509/x509_verify.c in LibreSSL before 3.6.1, and in OpenBSD before 7.2 errata 001. x509_verify_ctx_add_chain does not store errors that occur during leaf certificate verification, and therefore an incorrect error is returned. This behavior occurs when there is an installed verification callback that instructs the verifier to continue upon detecting an invalid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOpenBSD
Product-libresslopenbsdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36425
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 52.82%
||
7 Day CHG-0.03%
Published-19 Jul, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Arm Mbed TLS before 2.24.0. It incorrectly uses a revocationDate check when deciding whether to honor certificate revocation via a CRL. In some situations, an attacker can exploit this by changing the local clock.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxArm Limited
Product-mbed_tlsdebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-41316
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-15 May, 2025 | 15:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise’s TLS certificate auth method did not initially load the optionally configured CRL issued by the role's CA into memory on startup, resulting in the revocation list not being checked if the CRL has not yet been retrieved. Fixed in 1.12.0, 1.11.4, 1.10.7, and 1.9.10.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-vaultn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-3083
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Hive (JDBC + HiveServer2) implements SSL for plain TCP and HTTP connections (it supports both transport modes). While validating the server's certificate during the connection setup, the client in Apache Hive before 1.2.2 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 doesn't seem to be verifying the common name attribute of the certificate. In this way, if a JDBC client sends an SSL request to server abc.com, and the server responds with a valid certificate (certified by CA) but issued to xyz.com, the client will accept that as a valid certificate and the SSL handshake will go through.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-hiveApache Hive
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-20011
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 May, 2021 | 20:09
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libgrss through 0.7.0 fails to perform TLS certificate verification when downloading feeds, allowing remote attackers to manipulate the contents of feeds without detection. This occurs because of the default behavior of SoupSessionSync.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME Project
Product-libgrssn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1320
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jan, 2019 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Thrift Java client library versions 0.5.0 through 0.11.0 can bypass SASL negotiation isComplete validation in the org.apache.thrift.transport.TSaslTransport class. An assert used to determine if the SASL handshake had successfully completed could be disabled in production settings making the validation incomplete.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationF5, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-global_lifecycle_management_opatchdebian_linuxnosql_databasethrifttraffix_signaling_delivery_controllerApache Thrift
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1132
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.30% / 52.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Shoplat App for iOS 1.10.00 through 1.18.00 does not properly verify SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-docomon/a
Product-shoplatn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-12461
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
CVSS Score-3.5||LOW
EPSS-0.10% / 27.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2018 | 18:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate Revocation Check failure

Fixed issues with NetIQ eDirectory prior to 9.1.1 when checking certificate revocation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-netiqNetIQ
Product-edirectoryeDirectory
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-31083
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 38.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jun, 2022 | 18:15
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Authentication bypass in Parse Server Apple Game Center auth adapter

Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Prior to versions 4.10.11 and 5.2.2, the certificate in the Parse Server Apple Game Center auth adapter not validated. As a result, authentication could potentially be bypassed by making a fake certificate accessible via certain Apple domains and providing the URL to that certificate in an authData object. Versions 4.0.11 and 5.2.2 prevent this by introducing a new `rootCertificateUrl` property to the Parse Server Apple Game Center auth adapter which takes the URL to the root certificate of Apple's Game Center authentication certificate. If no value is set, the `rootCertificateUrl` property defaults to the URL of the current root certificate as of May 27, 2022. Keep in mind that the root certificate can change at any time and that it is the developer's responsibility to keep the root certificate URL up-to-date when using the Parse Server Apple Game Center auth adapter. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-parseplatformparse-community
Product-parse-serverparse-server
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0786
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.14% / 77.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jan, 2018 | 01:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2, 4.7, 4.7.1, .NET Core 1.0 and 2.0, and PowerShell Core 6.0.0 allow a security feature bypass vulnerability due to the way certificates are validated, aka ".NET Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability."

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016windows_server_2012windows_8.1.net_corewindows_rt_8.1windows_7windows_10powershell_core.net_frameworkwindows_server_2008.NET Framework, .NET Core, and PowerShell Core
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-0853
Matching Score-4
Assigner-curl
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-curl
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 36.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Feb, 2024 | 13:35
Updated-20 Jun, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OCSP verification bypass with TLS session reuse

curl inadvertently kept the SSL session ID for connections in its cache even when the verify status (*OCSP stapling*) test failed. A subsequent transfer to the same hostname could then succeed if the session ID cache was still fresh, which then skipped the verify status check.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-CURL
Product-curlcurl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-12496
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 May, 2019 | 10:59
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Hybrid Group Gobot before 1.13.0. The mqtt subsystem skips verification of root CA certificates by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hybridgroupn/a
Product-gobotn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11324
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.45% / 79.96%
||
7 Day CHG-0.12%
Published-18 Apr, 2019 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The urllib3 library before 1.24.2 for Python mishandles certain cases where the desired set of CA certificates is different from the OS store of CA certificates, which results in SSL connections succeeding in situations where a verification failure is the correct outcome. This is related to use of the ssl_context, ca_certs, or ca_certs_dir argument.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCanonical Ltd.Python Software Foundation
Product-ubuntu_linuxurllib3n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11497
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2019 | 17:24
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Couchbase Server 5.0.0, when an invalid Remote Cluster Certificate was entered as part of the reference creation, XDCR did not parse and check the certificate signature. It then accepted the invalid certificate and attempted to use it to establish future connections to the remote cluster. This has been fixed in version 5.5.0. XDCR now checks the validity of the certificate thoroughly and prevents a remote cluster reference from being created with an invalid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCouchbase, Inc.
Product-couchbase_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-29222
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 56.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 May, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in Pion DTLS

Pion DTLS is a Go implementation of Datagram Transport Layer Security. Prior to version 2.1.5, a DTLS Client could provide a Certificate that it doesn't posses the private key for and Pion DTLS wouldn't reject it. This issue affects users that are using Client certificates only. The connection itself is still secure. The Certificate provided by clients can't be trusted when using a Pion DTLS server prior to version 2.1.5. Users should upgrade to version 2.1.5 to receive a patch. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pionpion
Product-dtlsdtls
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-4017
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.31% / 53.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Aug, 2017 | 18:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Salt before 2014.7.6 does not verify certificates when connecting via the aliyun, proxmox, and splunk modules.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-saltstackn/a
Product-saltn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-0294
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.58% / 68.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 15:12
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 04:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

GnuTLS before 3.3.13 does not validate that the signature algorithms match when importing a certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GnuTLSRed Hat, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxGNU
Product-debian_linuxgnutlsenterprise_linuxGnuTLS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-0534
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.95% / 75.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Aug, 2015 | 10:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite (MES) 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.3, RSA BSAFE Crypto-J before 6.2, RSA BSAFE SSL-J before 6.2, and RSA BSAFE SSL-C 2.8.9 and earlier do not enforce certain constraints on certificate data, which allows remote attackers to defeat a fingerprint-based certificate-blacklist protection mechanism by including crafted data within a certificate's unsigned portion, a similar issue to CVE-2014-8275.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDell Inc.
Product-bsafe_ssl-cbsafebsafe_ssl-jn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-7143
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.35% / 56.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2019 | 13:04
Updated-25 Nov, 2024 | 18:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Python Twisted 14.0 trustRoot is not respected in HTTP client

Action-Not Available
Vendor-twistedn/a
Product-twistedn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-27589
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Nov, 2020 | 13:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Synopsys hub-rest-api-python (aka blackduck on PyPI) version 0.0.25 - 0.0.52 does not validate SSL certificates in certain cases.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-synopsysn/a
Product-hub-rest-api-pythonn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-2902
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Nov, 2019 | 22:05
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 10:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

wolfssl before 3.2.0 does not properly authorize CA certificate for signing other certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-3451
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.74% / 71.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Aug, 2017 | 18:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenFire XMPP Server before 3.10 accepts self-signed certificates, which allows remote attackers to perform unspecified spoofing attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-igniterealtimen/a
Product-openfiren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-2901
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Nov, 2019 | 22:02
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 10:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

wolfssl before 3.2.0 does not properly issue certificates for a server's hostname.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-27782
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 51.17%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-01 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 05:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libcurl would reuse a previously created connection even when a TLS or SSHrelated option had been changed that should have prohibited reuse.libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequenttransfers to reuse if one of them matches the setup. However, several TLS andSSH settings were left out from the configuration match checks, making themmatch too easily.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)CURL
Product-curluniversal_forwarderdebian_linuxhttps://github.com/curl/curl
CWE ID-CWE-840
Not Available
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-8337
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Feb, 2019 | 20:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In msmtp 1.8.2 and mpop 1.4.3, when tls_trust_file has its default configuration, certificate-verification results are not properly checked.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-marlamn/a
Product-msmtpmpopn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-25640
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-3.80% / 87.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 01:07
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 04:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, a TLS 1.3 server cannot properly enforce a requirement for mutual authentication. A client can simply omit the certificate_verify message from the handshake, and never present a certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-12608
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 08:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Docker Moby before 17.06.0. The Docker engine validated a client TLS certificate using both the configured client CA root certificate and all system roots on non-Windows systems. This allowed a client with any domain validated certificate signed by a system-trusted root CA (as opposed to one signed by the configured CA root certificate) to authenticate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mobyprojectn/a
Product-mobyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1000520
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 28.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jun, 2018 | 16:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 12:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ARM mbedTLS version 2.7.0 and earlier contains a Ciphersuite Allows Incorrectly Signed Certificates vulnerability in mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() that can result in ECDSA-signed certificates are accepted, when only RSA-signed ones should be.. This attack appear to be exploitable via Peers negotiate a TLS-ECDH-RSA-* ciphersuite. Any of the peers can then provide an ECDSA-signed certificate, when only an RSA-signed one should be accepted..

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm Limited
Product-mbed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0227
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 76.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Apr, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-29 Nov, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client Certificate Authentication feature for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection and bypass certain SSL certificate verification steps. The vulnerability is due to incorrect verification of the SSL Client Certificate. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to the ASA VPN without a proper private key and certificate pair. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection to the ASA when the connection should have been rejected. This vulnerability affects Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software that is running on the following Cisco products: 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliances (ISA), ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls, ASA Services Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliances (ASAv), Firepower 4110 Security Appliances, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Modules. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg40155.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-firepower_threat_defenseadaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco Adaptive Security Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found