IBM Security Identity Governance Virtual Appliance 5.2 through 5.2.3.2 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 126859.

IBM OpenPages GRC Platform 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 could allow an unauthenticated user to obtain sensitive information about the server that could be used in future attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 126241.

IBM Daeja ViewONE Professional, Standard & Virtual 4.1.5.1 and 5.0.2 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to inject data into log files made to look legitimate. IBM X-Force ID: 123850.

IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5) uses insufficiently random numbers or values in a security context that depends on unpredictable numbers. This weakness may allow attackers to expose sensitive information by guessing tokens or identifiers. IBM X-Force ID: 123909.

IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7 before 7.0.0.1 sends SSL traffic over "unsecured TCP," which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network.

IBM BigFix Compliance (TEMA SUAv1 SCA SCM) uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute force account credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 123672.

IBM BigFix Compliance (TEMA SUAv1 SCA SCM) 1.9.70 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 123671.

IBM Data Risk Manager (iDNA) 2.0.6 could disclose sensitive username information to an attacker using a specially crafted HTTP request. IBM X-Force ID: 184929.

IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (IBM BigFix 9.2 and 9.5) does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 123861.

IBM BigFix Compliance 1.7 through 1.9.91 discloses sensitive information to unauthorized users. The information can be used to mount further attacks on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 123429.

IBM Security Verify Access OIDC Provider could disclose directory information that could aid attackers in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 239445.

IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, and 10.1 through 10.1.4 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 124675.

IBM OpenPages GRC Platform 7.2 and 7.3 with OpenPages Loss Event Entry (LEE) application could allow a user to obtain sensitive information including private APIs that could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 122201.

IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5) discloses sensitive information to unauthorized users. The information can be used to mount further attacks on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 123860.

IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 123903.

IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could disclose sensitive information through an HTTP request that could aid an attacker in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 240452.

IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate which could disclose sensitive information which could aid further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 240455.

IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5) stores sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 123904.

IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.2.1 could be vulnerable to sensitive information exposure by passing API keys to log files. If these keys contain sensitive information, it could lead to further attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 240450.

IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12 through 21.0.6 is vulnerable to exposure of the name and email for the creator/modifier of platform level objects. IBM X-Force ID: 238678.

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 authorization checks are done incorrectly for some HTTP requests which allows getting unauthorized technical information (e.g. event log entries) about the FTM SWIFT system. IBM X-Force ID: 239708.

IBM Aspera Console 3.4.0 through 3.4.4 could disclose sensitive information in HTTP headers that could be used in further attacks against the system.

IBM Security Guardium 11.5 could disclose sensitive information due to a missing or insecure SameSite attribute for a sensitive cookie. IBM X-Force ID: 240897.

IBM WebSphere Message Broker (IBM Integration Bus 9.0 and 10.0) could allow an unauthorized user to obtain sensitive information about software versions that could lead to further attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 121341.

The Linux kernel version 3.3-rc1 and later is affected by a vulnerability lies in the processing of incoming L2CAP commands - ConfigRequest, and ConfigResponse messages. This info leak is a result of uninitialized stack variables that may be returned to an attacker in their uninitialized state. By manipulating the code flows that precede the handling of these configuration messages, an attacker can also gain some control over which data will be held in the uninitialized stack variables. This can allow him to bypass KASLR, and stack canaries protection - as both pointers and stack canaries may be leaked in this manner. Combining this vulnerability (for example) with the previously disclosed RCE vulnerability in L2CAP configuration parsing (CVE-2017-1000251) may allow an attacker to exploit the RCE against kernels which were built with the above mitigations. These are the specifics of this vulnerability: In the function l2cap_parse_conf_rsp and in the function l2cap_parse_conf_req the following variable is declared without initialization: struct l2cap_conf_efs efs; In addition, when parsing input configuration parameters in both of these functions, the switch case for handling EFS elements may skip the memcpy call that will write to the efs variable: ... case L2CAP_CONF_EFS: if (olen == sizeof(efs)) memcpy(&efs, (void *)val, olen); ... The olen in the above if is attacker controlled, and regardless of that if, in both of these functions the efs variable would eventually be added to the outgoing configuration request that is being built: l2cap_add_conf_opt(&ptr, L2CAP_CONF_EFS, sizeof(efs), (unsigned long) &efs); So by sending a configuration request, or response, that contains an L2CAP_CONF_EFS element, but with an element length that is not sizeof(efs) - the memcpy to the uninitialized efs variable can be avoided, and the uninitialized variable would be returned to the attacker (16 bytes).

IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.1.2 and 7.6.1.3 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 237587.

IBM QRadar 7.2 discloses sensitive information to unauthorized users. The information can be used to mount further attacks on the system. IBM Reference #: 1999533.

IBM Cognos Controller 11.0.0 and 11.0.1 exposes server details that could allow an attacker to obtain information of the application environment to conduct further attacks.

IBM QRadar 7.2 and 7.3 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 119783.

The SORT/LIST SERVICES component in IBM DB2 9.1 before FP6 and 9.5 before FP2 writes sensitive information to the trace output, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading "PASSWORD-RELATED CONNECTION STRING KEYWORD VALUES."

Adobe ColdFusion Builder versions 2016 update 2 and earlier, 3.0.3 and earlier have an important vulnerability that could lead to information disclosure.

IBM BigFix Inventory v9 could disclose sensitive information to an unauthorized user using HTTP GET requests. This information could be used to mount further attacks against the system.

The IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (IBM Spectrum Protect 7.1 and 8.1) default authentication protocol is vulnerable to a brute force attack due to disclosing too much information during authentication. An attacker could gain user or administrative access to the TSM server. IBM X-Force ID: 118750.

Acronis True Image Echo Server 9.x build 8072 on Linux does not properly encrypt backups to an FTP server, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.

Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.252 and 19.x before 19.0.0.207 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.535 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 19.0.0.213, Adobe AIR SDK before 19.0.0.213, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 19.0.0.213 allow remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy and obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.

The web portal in IBM Tealeaf Customer Experience before 8.7.1.8847 FP10, 8.8 before 8.8.0.9049 FP9, 9.0.0 and 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.1117 FP5, 9.0.1A before 9.0.1.5108_9.0.1A FP5, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.1223 FP3, and 9.0.2A before 9.0.2.5224_9.0.2A FP3 does not enforce password-length restrictions, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force attack.

Calacode @Mail 5.41 on Linux uses weak world-readable permissions for (1) webmail/libs/Atmail/Config.php and (2) webmail/webadmin/.htpasswd, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading these files. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.

IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to set the secure flag for the session cookie in SSL mode. By intercepting its transmission within an HTTP session, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to capture the cookie and obtain sensitive information.

IBM UrbanCode Deploy could allow an authenticated user with access to the REST endpoints to access API and CLI getResource secured role properties.

Unspecified vulnerability in Wsadmin in the System Management/Repository component in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 5.1 before 5.1.1.19 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via vectors related to "previously encrypted properties" that are not encrypted.

IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.1 through 7.1.1.13, 7.5 before 7.5.0.10 IF4, and 7.6 before 7.6.0.5 IF3 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTTP request that triggers construction of a runtime error message.

IBM Tivoli Monitoring V6 could allow an unauthenticated user to access SOAP queries that could contain sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 117696.

IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager (ISPIM) Virtual Appliance 2.x before 2.0.2 FP8 allows remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms and obtain sensitive information by leveraging a weak algorithm.

IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager Virtual Appliance version 2.0.2 uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute force account credentials.

IBM Tivoli Key Lifecycle Manager 2.5 and 2.6 uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute force account credentials.

IBM Tivoli Key Lifecycle Manager does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts.

IBM Tivoli Key Lifecycle Manager 2.5 and 2.6 can be deployed with active debugging code that can disclose sensitive information.

IBM Security Access Manager for Web 7.0.0, 8.0.0, and 9.0.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM Reference #: 1996868.

The CQWeb login page in IBM Rational ClearQuest 7.0.1 allows remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information (page source code) via a combination of ?script? and ?/script? sequences in the id field, possibly related to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

Directory traversal vulnerability in the Configuration Manager in IBM Sterling Secure Proxy (SSP) 3.4.2 before 3.4.2.0 iFix 8 and 3.4.3 before 3.4.3.0 iFix 1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted URL.