Manage Incoming Payment Files (F1680) of SAP S/4HANA does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. As a result, it has high impact on integrity and no impact on the confidentiality and availability of the system.
SAP Focused RUN versions 200, 300, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, which allows a user to call the oData service and manipulate the activation for the SAP EarlyWatch Alert service data collection and sending to SAP without the intended authorization.
Missing authorization check in a transaction within SAP Leasing (update provided in SAP_APPL 6.18, EA-APPL 6.0, 6.02, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16 and 6.17).
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (B2B Toolkit), before versions 1.0 and 2.0, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, allowing the import of B2B table content that leads to Missing Authorization Check.
SAP S/4 HANA (Fiori UI for General Ledger Accounting), versions 103, 104, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user working with attachment service, allowing the attacker to delete attachments due to Missing Authorization Check.
A certain template role in SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP and ABAP Platform - versions 700, 701, 702, 710, 711, 730, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, contains transport authorizations, which exceed expected display only permissions.
The grant.xsfunc application in testApps/grantAccess/ in the XS Engine in SAP HANA DB 1.00.73.00.389160 (NewDB100_REL) allows remote authenticated users to spoof log entries via a crafted request, aka SAP Security Note 2109818.
Due to improper input validation in InfraBox, logs can be modified by an authenticated user.
In CLA-Assistant, versions before 2.8.5, due to improper access control an authenticated user could access API endpoints which are not intended to be used by the user. This could impact the integrity of the application.
The DSA algorithm implementation in SAP SAPCRYPTOLIB 5.555.38 does not properly check signatures, which allows remote authenticated users to impersonate arbitrary users via unspecified vectors, aka SAP Security Note 2223008.
Under certain conditions a malicious user can inject log files of SAP Internet Graphics Server (IGS), 7.20, 7.20EXT, 7.45, 7.49, 7.53, hiding important information in the log file.
The security audit log of SAP HANA, versions 1.0 and 2.0, does not log SELECT events if these events are part of a statement with the syntax CREATE TABLE <table_name> AS SELECT.
When user with insufficient privileges tries to access any application in SAP NetWeaver Administrator (Administrator applications), version - 7.50, no security audit log is created. Therefore, security audit log Integrity is impacted.
SAP Web Dispatcher and Internet Communication Manager (ICM), versions - KRNL32NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL32UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL64NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, KRNL64UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, WEBDISP 7.53, 7.73, 7.77, 7.81, 7.82, 7.83, KERNEL 7.21, 7.22, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, 7.77, 7.81, 7.82, 7.83, process invalid HTTP header. The incorrect handling of the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner leads to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling attack. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass web application firewall protection, divert sensitive data such as customer requests, session credentials, etc.
SAP NetWeaver Application Server JAVA(XML Forms) versions 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50 does not sufficiently encode user controlled inputs, which allows an authenticated User with special roles to store malicious content, that when accessed by a victim, can perform malicious actions by executing JavaScript, leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting.
Due to missing authorization check in SAP for Oil & Gas (Transportation and Distribution), an attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user could call a remote-enabled function which will allow them to delete non-sensitive entries in a user data table. There is no effect on confidentiality or availability.
SAP Student Life Cycle Management (SLcM) fails to conduct proper authorization checks for authenticated users, leading to the potential escalation of privileges. On successful exploitation it could allow an attacker to delete non-sensitive report variants that are typically restricted, causing minimal impact on the integrity of the application.
SAP shared service framework allows an authenticated non-administrative user to call a remote-enabled function, which will allow them to insert value entries into a non-sensitive table, causing low impact on integrity of the application
Manage Bank Statement ReProcessing Rules does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can enable/disable the sharing rule of other users affecting the integrity of the application. Confidentiality and Availability are not affected.
Due to missing authorization check, SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP and ABAP Platform allows an attacker logged in as a developer to read objects contained in a package. This causes an impact on confidentiality, as this attacker would otherwise not have access to view these objects.
Elements of PDCE does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This allows an attacker to read sensitive information causing high impact on the confidentiality of the application.
SAP Commerce - versions 2105.3, 2011.13, 2005.18, 1905.34, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. Authenticated attackers will be able to access and edit data from b2b units they do not belong to.
SAP CRM WebClient does not perform necessary authorization check for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This could allow an attacker to access some sensitive information.
SAP BW/4HANA Transformation and Data Transfer Process (DTP) allows an authenticated attacker to gain higher access levels than they should have by exploiting improper authorization checks. This results in escalation of privileges. It has no impact on the confidentiality of data but may have low impacts on the integrity and availability of the application.
SAP ERP Financial Accounting (RFOPENPOSTING_FR) versions - SAP_APPL - 600, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 616, SAP_FIN - 617, 618, 700, 720, 730, SAPSCORE - 125, S4CORE, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, allows a registered attacker to invoke certain functions that would otherwise be restricted to specific users. These functions are normally exposed over the network and once exploited the attacker may be able to view and modify financial accounting data that only a specific user should have access to.
SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java (JMS Connector Service) - versions 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, does not perform necessary authorization checks for user privileges.
SAP S/4HANA Finance (Advanced Payment Management) does not perform necessary authorization check for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. As a result, it has a low impact to confidentiality and availability but there is no impact on the integrity.
A missing authority check in SAP CRM, versions - 700, 701, 702, 712, 713, 714, could be leveraged by an attacker with high privileges to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the system.
SAP NetWeaver Guided Procedures (Administration Workset), versions - 7.10, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. The impact of missing authorization could result to abuse of functionality restricted to a particular user group, and could allow unauthorized users to read, modify or delete restricted data.
Due to missing authorization check, attacker with business user account in SAP ABAP Platform - version 758, 795, can change the privacy setting of job templates from shared to private. As a result, the selected template would only be accessible to the owner.
The SAP Fiori app (My Overtime Request) - version 605, does not perform the necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user which may result in an escalation of privileges. It is possible to manipulate the URLs of data requests to access information that the user should not have access to. There is no impact on integrity and availability.
SAP Master Data Governance for Material Data - versions 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 800, 801, 802, 803, 804, does not perform necessary authorization check for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This could allow an attacker to read some sensitive information but no impact to integrity and availability.
SAP Bank Account Management (BAM) allows an authenticated user with restricted access to use functions which can result in escalation of privileges with low impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application.
Due to the missing authorization checks in the local systems, the admin users of SAP Web Dispatcher, SAP NetWeaver Application Server (ABAP and Java), and SAP Content Server can impersonate other users and may perform some unintended actions. This could lead to a low impact on confidentiality and a high impact on the integrity and availability of the applications.
An unauthenticated attacker over the network can attach to an open interface exposed through JNDI by the User Defined Search (UDS) of SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (PI) - version 7.50 and make use of an open naming and directory API to access services which can be used to perform unauthorized operations affecting users and data across the entire system. This allows the attacker to have full read access to user data, make limited modifications to user data, and degrade the performance of the system, leading to a high impact on confidentiality and a limited impact on the availability and integrity of the application.
An unauthenticated user can attach to an open interface exposed through JNDI by the Messaging System of SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (PI) - version 7.50. This user can make use of an open naming and directory API to access services that could perform unauthorized operations. The vulnerability affects local users and data, leading to a considerable impact on confidentiality as well as availability and a limited impact on the integrity of the application. These operations can be used to: * Read any information * Modify sensitive information * Denial of Service attacks (DoS) * SQL Injection
SAP Bank Account Management does not perform necessary authorization check for an authorized user, resulting in escalation of privileges. As a result, it has a low impact to confidentiality to the system.
SAP's HCM Travel Management Fiori Apps V2, version - 608, does not perform proper authorization check, allowing an authenticated but unauthorized attacker to read personnel numbers of employees, resulting in escalation of privileges. However, the attacker can only read some information like last name, first name of the employees, so there is some loss of confidential information, Integrity and Availability are not impacted.
SAP NetWeaver AS JAVA (Customer Usage Provisioning Servlet), versions - 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, allows an attacker to read some statistical data like product version, traffic, timestamp etc. because of missing authorization check in the servlet.
Due to insecure session management, SAP Enable Now allows an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to user's account. On successful exploitation, an attacker can view or modify user data causing limited impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application.
SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP and ABAP Platform, versions - 700, 702, 710, 711, 730, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, contains function module SRM_RFC_SUBMIT_REPORT which fails to validate authorization of an authenticated user thus allowing an unauthorized user to execute reports in SAP NetWeaver ABAP Platform.
The BW Database Interface does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges that allows the user to practically read out any database table.
SAP Enterprise Financial Services versions, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 600, 603, 604, 605, 606, 616, 617, 618, 800, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
SAP Banking Services (Generic Market Data) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. An unauthorized User is allowed to display restricted Business Partner Generic Market Data (GMD), due to improper authorization check.
SAP Payment Engine version 500, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
Within SAP S/4HANA - versions S4CORE 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, SAPSCORE 127, the application business partner extension for Spain/Slovakia does not perform necessary authorization checks for a low privileged authenticated user over the network, resulting in escalation of privileges leading to low impact on confidentiality and integrity of the data.
SAP S/4 HANA (Financial Products Subledger and Banking Services), versions - FSAPPL 400, 450, 500 and S4FPSL 100, allows an authenticated user to run an analysis report due to Missing Authorization Check, resulting in slowing the system.
SAP ERP (HCM Travel Management), versions - 600, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, allows an authenticated but unauthorized attacker to read, modify and settle trips, resulting in escalation of privileges, due to Missing Authorization Check.
SAP Master Data Governance, versions - 748, 749, 750, 751, 752, 800, 801, 802, 803, 804, allows users to display change request details without having required authorizations, due to Missing Authorization Check.
SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, allowing access to administration accounts by a user with no roles, leading to Missing Authorization Check.