SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal - versions 7.10, 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, resulting in reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal - versions 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, resulting in reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.This reflected cross-site scripting attack can be used to non-permanently deface or modify displayed content of portal Website. The execution of the script content by a victim registered on the portal could compromise the confidentiality and integrity of victim’s web browser.

Due to insufficient input sanitization, SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP (BSP Framework) - versions 700, 701, 702, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, allows an unauthenticated user to alter the current session of the user by injecting the malicious code over the network and gain access to the unintended data. This may lead to a limited impact on the confidentiality and the integrity of the application.

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal - version 7.50, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs over the network, resulting in reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, therefore changing the scope of the attack. On successful exploitation, an attacker can view or modify information causing a limited impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application.

In SAP Enable Now - versions WPB_MANAGER 1.0, WPB_MANAGER_CE 10, WPB_MANAGER_HANA 10, ENABLE_NOW_CONSUMP_DEL 1704, the Content-Security-Policy and X-XSS-Protection response headers are not implemented, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to attempt reflected cross-site scripting, which could result in disclosure or modification of information.

Due to improper neutralization of input in SAPUI5 - versions SAP_UI 750, SAP_UI 754, SAP_UI 755, SAP_UI 756, SAP_UI 757, UI_700 200, sap.m.FormattedText SAPUI5 control allows injection of untrusted CSS. This blocks user’s interaction with the application. Further, in the absence of URL validation by the application, the vulnerability could lead to the attacker reading or modifying user’s information through phishing attack.

SAP Biller Direct allows an unauthenticated attacker to craft a legitimate looking URL. When clicked by an unsuspecting victim, it will use an unsensitized parameter to redirect the victim to a malicious site of the attacker's choosing which can result in disclosure or modification of the victim's information.

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal does - versions 7.10, 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs over the network, resulting in reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, therefore changing the scope of the attack. This leads to limited impact on confidentiality and integrity of data.

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal - versions 7.10, 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, resulting in reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

Under certain conditions, NetWeaver Enterprise Portal, versions - 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, does not sufficiently encode URL parameters. An attacker can craft a malicious link and send it to a victim. A successful attack results in Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

Under certain conditions, NetWeaver Enterprise Portal, versions - 7.10, 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, does not sufficiently encode report data. An attacker can craft malicious data and print it to the report. In a successful attack, a victim opens the report, and the malicious script gets executed in the victim's browser, resulting in a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

SAP Netweaver Application Server Java (Applications based on WebDynpro Java) versions 7.00, 7.10, 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, allow an attacker to redirect users to a malicious site due to Reverse Tabnabbing vulnerabilities.

SAP UI5 versions before 1.38.49, 1.52.49, 1.60.34, 1.71.31, 1.78.18, 1.84.5, 1.85.4, 1.86.1 allows an unauthenticated attacker to redirect users to a malicious site due to Reverse Tabnabbing vulnerabilities.

SAP Web Dynpro ABAP allow an attacker to redirect users to a malicious site due to Reverse Tabnabbing vulnerabilities.

SAP NetWeaver AS for ABAP (Web Survey), versions - 700, 702, 710, 711, 730, 731, 750, 750, 752, 75A, 75F, does not sufficiently encode input and output parameters which results in reflected cross site scripting vulnerability, through which a malicious user can access data relating to the current session and use it to impersonate a user and access all information with the same rights as the target user.

Under certain conditions, ABAP Online Community in SAP NetWeaver (SAP_BASIS version 7.40) and SAP S/4HANA (SAP_BASIS versions 7.50, 7.51, 7.52, 7.53, 7.54), does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, resulting in Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

SAP Fiori Launchpad, versions- 753, 754, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, and hence allowing the attacker to inject the meta tag into the launchpad html using the vulnerable parameter, leading to reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

SAP NetWeaver (Knowledge Management ICE Service), versions 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute malicious scripts leading to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

SAP Netweaver AS ABAP(BSP Test Application sbspext_table), version-700,701,720,730,731,740,750,751,752,753,754,755, allows an unauthenticated attacker to send polluted URL to the victim, when the victim clicks on this URL, the attacker can read, modify the information available in the victim�s browser leading to Reflected Cross Site Scripting.

Java Server Pages (JSPs) provided by the SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (SAP_XIESR and SAP_XITOOL: 7.10 to 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50) do not restrict or incorrectly restrict frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain, resulting in Clickjacking vulnerability. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability leads to unwanted modification of user's data.

An issue in Yamcs 5.8.6 allows attackers to send aribitrary telelcommands in a Command Stack via Clickjacking.

The DuckDuckGo browser 7.64.4 on iOS allows Address Bar Spoofing due to mishandling of the JavaScript window.open function (used to open a secondary browser window). This could be exploited by tricking users into supplying sensitive information such as credentials, because the address bar would display a legitimate URL, but content would be hosted on the attacker's web site.

The swagger-ui-dist package before 4.1.3 for Node.js could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim.

Improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames vulnerability in SSOOauth.cgi in Synology SSO Server before 2.1.3-0129 allows remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via unspecified vectors.

A vulnerability has been identified in Desigo Insight (All versions). The device does not properly set the X-Frame-Options HTTP Header which makes it vulnerable to Clickjacking attacks. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to retrieve or modify data in the context of a legitimate user by tricking that user to click on a website controlled by the attacker.

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.0 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 172877.

Clickjack vulnerability in Adminstrator web console in McAfee Web Gateway (MWG) 7.8.2.x prior to 7.8.2.12 allows remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web page that contains an iframe via does not send an X-Frame-Options HTTP header.

The issue was addressed with improved UI handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.6, Safari 17.6, macOS Monterey 12.7.6, macOS Ventura 13.6.8. Visiting a website that frames malicious content may lead to UI spoofing.

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to 3.2.5 and 3.3.0.beta5, the vulnerability allows an attacker to inject iframes from any domain, bypassing the intended restrictions enforced by the allowed_iframes setting. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.2.5 and 3.3.0.beta5.

Sametime is impacted by lack of clickjacking protection in Outlook add-in. The application is not implementing appropriate protections in order to protect users from clickjacking attacks.

IBM Security Directory Server 6.4.0 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 165950.

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, 7, and 8 does not enforce intended domain restrictions on content access, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web site, aka "Frame Tag Information Disclosure Vulnerability."

A vulnerability has been found in multiple revisions of Emerson Rosemount X-STREAM Gas Analyzer. The affected product’s web interface allows an attacker to route click or keystroke to another page provided by the attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information.

IBM Cloud Application Performance Management 8.1.4 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 157509.

IBM SmartCloud Analytics 1.3.1 through 1.3.5 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 159186.

IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale 8.6 Admin Console could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 158102.

IBM Security Information Queue (ISIQ) 1.0.0, 1.0.1, and 1.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 159226.

A clickjacking vulnerability exists in zenml-io/zenml versions up to and including 0.55.5 due to the application's failure to set appropriate X-Frame-Options or Content-Security-Policy HTTP headers. This vulnerability allows an attacker to embed the application UI within an iframe on a malicious page, potentially leading to unauthorized actions by tricking users into interacting with the interface under the attacker's control. The issue was addressed in version 0.56.3.

The browser could have been confused into transferring a pointer lock state into another tab, which could have lead to clickjacking attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 85.

Clickjacking vulnerability in Clibo Manager v1.1.9.12 in the '/public/login' directory, a login panel. This vulnerability occurs due to the absence of an X-Frame-Options server-side header. An attacker could overlay a transparent iframe to perform click hijacking on victims.

A vulnerability in the web-based interface of Cisco HyperFlex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute a cross-frame scripting (XFS) attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient HTML iframe protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by directing a user to an attacker-controlled web page that contains a malicious HTML iframe. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct clickjacking or other clientside browser attacks.

The timing of a button click causing a popup to disappear was approximately the same length as the anti-clickjacking delay on permission prompts. It was possible to use this fact to surprise users by luring them to click where the permission grant button would be about to appear. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 115.6 and Firefox < 121.

A clickjacking vulnerability has been identified in OnCell G3150A-LTE Series firmware versions v1.3 and prior. This vulnerability is caused by incorrectly restricts frame objects, which can lead to user confusion about which interface the user is interacting with. This vulnerability may lead the attacker to trick the user into interacting with the application.

LogMeIn LastPass before 4.33.0 allows attackers to construct a crafted web site that captures the credentials for a victim's account on a previously visited web site, because do_popupregister can be bypassed via clickjacking.

By manipulating the fullscreen feature while opening a data-list, an attacker could have overlaid a text box over the address bar. This could have led to user confusion and possible spoofing attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 127.

Palantir Gotham was found to be vulnerable to a bug where under certain circumstances, the frontend could have applied an incorrect classification to a newly created property or link.

SmartBear CodeCollaborator v6.1.6102 was discovered to contain a vulnerability in the web UI which would allow an attacker to conduct a clickjacking attack.

Improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames in EC-CUBE versions from 3.0.0 to 3.0.18 leads to clickjacking attacks. If a user accesses a specially crafted page while logged into the administrative page, unintended operations may be conducted.

In Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS), it was found that some security related HTTP headers were missing, allowing an attacker to exploit this with a clickjacking attack. An attacker could exploit this by convincing a valid RHACS user to visit an attacker-controlled web page, that deceptively points to valid RHACS endpoints, hijacking the user's account permissions to perform other actions.

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0 through 10.1.6 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 193656.