A remote unauthenticated attacker can abuse a web service in SAP NetWeaver Application Server for Java (Administrator System Overview), versions 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, by sending a specially crafted XML file and trick the application server into leaking authentication credentials for its own SAP Management console, resulting in Server-Side Request Forgery.

Qualitor v8.24 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /request/viewValidacao.php.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WisdmLabs Edwiser Bridge.This issue affects Edwiser Bridge: from n/a through 3.0.7.

Stimulsoft GmbH Stimulsoft Designer (Web) 2023.1.3 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). TThe Reporting Designer (Web) offers the possibility to embed sources from external locations. If the user chooses an external location, the request to that resource is performed by the server rather than the client. Therefore, the server causes outbound traffic and potentially imports data. An attacker may also leverage this behaviour to exfiltrate data of machines on the internal network of the server hosting the Stimulsoft Reporting Designer (Web).

GroupViewProxyServlet in RoomWizard before 4.4.x allows SSRF via the url parameter.

The copy function in application/admin/controller/Article.php in NoneCms 1.3.0 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal and external network resources via Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF), because URL validation only considers whether the URL contains the "csdn" substring.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.2 and 6.3 have a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

SSRF in Apache HTTP Server on Windows with mod_rewrite in server/vhost context, allows to potentially leak NTML hashes to a malicious server via SSRF and malicious requests. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.62 which fixes this issue. 

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Apache HTTP Server on Windows allows to potentially leak NTLM hashes to a malicious server via  mod_rewrite or apache expressions that pass unvalidated request input. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.0 through 2.4.63. Note:  The Apache HTTP Server Project will be setting a higher bar for accepting vulnerability reports regarding SSRF via UNC paths. The server offers limited protection against administrators directing the server to open UNC paths. Windows servers should limit the hosts they will connect over via SMB based on the nature of NTLM authentication.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.4 and earlier have a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the gradio-app/gradio version 4.21.0, specifically within the `/queue/join` endpoint and the `save_url_to_cache` function. The vulnerability arises when the `path` value, obtained from the user and expected to be a URL, is used to make an HTTP request without sufficient validation checks. This flaw allows an attacker to send crafted requests that could lead to unauthorized access to the local network or the AWS metadata endpoint, thereby compromising the security of internal servers.

The Omni Commerce Connect API (OCC) of SAP Hybris Commerce, versions 6.*, is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. This is due to a misconfiguration of XML parser that is used in the server-side implementation of OCC.

txtdot is an HTTP proxy that parses only text, links, and pictures from pages, removing ads and heavy scripts. Starting in version 1.4.0 and prior to version 1.6.1, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the `/proxy` route of txtdot allows remote attackers to use the server as a proxy to send HTTP GET requests to arbitrary targets and retrieve information in the internal network. Version 1.6.1 patches the issue.

Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SAP Central Management Console, BI Launchpad and Fiori BI Launchpad, 4.10, from 4.20, from 4.30, could allow a malicious user to use common techniques to determine which ports are in use on the backend server.

With this SSRF vulnerability, an attacker can reach internal addresses to make a request as the server and read it's contents. This attack can lead to leak of sensitive information.

The vCenter Server contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A malicious actor with network access to 443 on the vCenter Server may exploit this issue by accessing a URL request outside of vCenter Server or accessing an internal service.

Nuxt is a free and open-source framework to create full-stack web applications and websites with Vue.js. `nuxt/icon` provides an API to allow client side icon lookup. This endpoint is at `/api/_nuxt_icon/[name]`. The proxied request path is improperly parsed, allowing an attacker to change the scheme and host of the request. This leads to SSRF, and could potentially lead to sensitive data exposure. The `new URL` constructor is used to parse the final path. This constructor can be passed a relative scheme or path in order to change the host the request is sent to. This constructor is also very tolerant of poorly formatted URLs. As a result we can pass a path prefixed with the string `http:`. This has the effect of changing the scheme to HTTP. We can then subsequently pass a new host, for example `http:127.0.0.1:8080`. This would allow us to send requests to a local server. This issue has been addressed in release version 1.4.5 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

The Dundas BI server before 5.0.1.1010 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery attack, allowing an attacker to forge arbitrary requests (with certain restrictions) that will be executed on behalf of the attacker, via the viewUrl parameter of the "export the dashboard as an image" feature. This could be leveraged to provide a proxy to attack other servers (internal or external) or to perform network scans of external or internal networks.

An SSRF issue was discovered in tecrail Responsive FileManager 9.13.4 via the upload.php url parameter. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-15495.

An SSRF vulnerability was discovered in idreamsoft iCMS 7.0.11 because the remote function in app/spider/spider_tools.class.php does not block DNS hostnames associated with private and reserved IP addresses, as demonstrated by 127.0.0.1 in an A record. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-14858.

An SSRF vulnerability in webhooks in Gitea through 1.5.0-rc2 and Gogs through 0.11.53 allows remote attackers to access intranet services.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.5.

SSRF on /proxy in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.4. An attacker can make a request as the server and read its contents. This can lead to a leak of sensitive information.

An SSRF vulnerability was discovered in idreamsoft iCMS before V7.0.11 because the remote function in app/spider/spider_tools.class.php does not block private and reserved IP addresses such as 10.0.0.0/8. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-14514.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.4 and earlier have a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository transloadit/uppy prior to 3.3.1.

Ligeo Archives Ligeo Basics as of 02_01-2022 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which allows an attacker to read any documents via the download features.

Sentinel 1.8.2 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

Zoho ManageEngine SupportCenter Plus before 11016 is vulnerable to an SSRF attack in ActionExecutor.

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (Unified CCX) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve a cleartext password. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg71040.

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve a cleartext password from an affected system. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg71044.

GeoServer through 2.18.5 and 2.19.x through 2.19.2 allows SSRF via the option for setting a proxy host.

In Gradle Enterprise before 2021.1.3, an attacker with the ability to perform SSRF attacks can potentially discover credentials for other resources.

The AppCheck research team identified a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the DNN CMS platform, formerly known as DotNetNuke. SSRF vulnerabilities allow the attacker to exploit the target system to make network requests on their behalf, allowing a range of possible attacks. In the most common scenario, the attacker exploits SSRF vulnerabilities to attack systems behind the firewall and access sensitive information from Cloud Provider metadata services.

There is a server-side request forgery vulnerability in HUAWEI P40 versions 10.1.0.118(C00E116R3P3). This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of parameters while dealing with some messages. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain access to certain resource which the attacker are supposed not to do.

Server Side Request Forgery in Apache Solr, versions 1.3 until 7.6 (inclusive). Since the "shards" parameter does not have a corresponding whitelist mechanism, a remote attacker with access to the server could make Solr perform an HTTP GET request to any reachable URL.

Plone though 5.2.4 allows SSRF via the lxml parser. This affects Diazo themes, Dexterity TTW schemas, and modeleditors in plone.app.theming, plone.app.dexterity, and plone.supermodel.

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) information disclosure vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to locate online agents via a sweep.

Concrete CMS (formerly concrete5) versions 8.5.6 and below and version 9.0.0 allow local IP importing causing the system to be vulnerable toa. SSRF attacks on the private LAN servers by reading files from the local LAN. An attacker can pivot in the private LAN and exploit local network appsandb. SSRF Mitigation Bypass through DNS RebindingConcrete CMS security team gave this a CVSS score of 3.5 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:NConcrete CMS is maintaining Concrete version 8.5.x until 1 May 2022 for security fixes.This CVE is shared with HackerOne Reports https://hackerone.com/reports/1364797 and https://hackerone.com/reports/1360016Reporters: Adrian Tiron from FORTBRIDGE (https://www.fortbridge.co.uk/ ) and Bipul Jaiswal

The LikeBtn WordPress Like Button Rating ♥ LikeBtn WordPress plugin before 2.6.32 was vulnerable to Unauthenticated Full-Read Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

2FAuth is a web app to manage Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) accounts and generate their security codes. Two interconnected vulnerabilities exist in version 5.4.1 a SSRF and URI validation bypass issue. The endpoint at POST /api/v1/twofaccounts/preview allows setting a remote URI to retrieve the image of a 2fa site. By abusing this functionality, it is possible to force the application to make a GET request to an arbitrary URL, whose content will be stored in an image file in the server if it looks like an image. Additionally, the library does some basic validation on the URI, attempting to filter our URIs which do not have an image extension. However, this can be easily bypassed by appending the string `#.svg` to the URI. The combination of these two issues allows an attacker to retrieve URIs accessible from the application, as long as their content type is text based. If not, the request is still sent, but the response is not reflected to the attacker. Version 5.4.1 fixes the issues.

Prior to version 10.9.0, the sharing/rest/content/features/analyze endpoint is always accessible to anonymous users, which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to induce Esri Portal for ArcGIS to read arbitrary URLs.

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in smarts-srl.com Smart Agent v.1.1.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted script to the /FB/getFbVideoSource.php component.

Sematell ReplyOne 7.4.3.0 allows SSRF via the application server API.

Server-side request forgery in Ivanti Avalanche before version 6.4.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to leak sensitive information.

An SSRF issue was discovered in OpenStack Glance before Newton. The 'copy_from' feature in the Image Service API v1 allowed an attacker to perform masked network port scans. With v1, it is possible to create images with a URL such as 'http://localhost:22'. This could then allow an attacker to enumerate internal network details while appearing masked, since the scan would appear to originate from the Glance Image service.

The WP STAGING WordPress Backup Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.5.0 does not prevent users with the administrator role from pinging conducting SSRF attacks, which may be a problem in multisite configurations.

JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.8873 is vulnerable to SSRF in the Workflow component.

The ECT Provider component in OutSystems Platform Server 10 before 10.0.1104.0 and 11 before 11.9.0 (and LifeTime management console before 11.7.0) allows SSRF for arbitrary outbound HTTP requests.