Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2021-29653

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-22 Apr, 2021 | 16:41
Updated At-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected At-
Credits

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise 1.5.1 and newer, under certain circumstances, may exclude revoked but unexpired certificates from the CRL. Fixed in 1.5.8, 1.6.4, and 1.7.1.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:22 Apr, 2021 | 16:41
Updated At:03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise 1.5.1 and newer, under certain circumstances, may exclude revoked but unexpired certificates from the CRL. Fixed in 1.5.8, 1.6.4, and 1.7.1.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2021-09-vault-s-pki-engine-crl-may-exclude-revoked-but-unexpired-certificates-after-tidy/23461/2
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2021-09-vault-s-pki-engine-crl-may-exclude-revoked-but-unexpired-certificates-after-tidy/23461/2
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2021-09-vault-s-pki-engine-crl-may-exclude-revoked-but-unexpired-certificates-after-tidy/23461/2
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2021-09-vault-s-pki-engine-crl-may-exclude-revoked-but-unexpired-certificates-after-tidy/23461/2
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:22 Apr, 2021 | 17:15
Updated At:29 Apr, 2021 | 13:29

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise 1.5.1 and newer, under certain circumstances, may exclude revoked but unexpired certificates from the CRL. Fixed in 1.5.8, 1.6.4, and 1.7.1.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Primary2.04.3MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 4.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

HashiCorp, Inc.
hashicorp
>>vault>>Versions from 1.5.1(inclusive) to 1.5.8(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:vault:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*
HashiCorp, Inc.
hashicorp
>>vault>>Versions from 1.5.1(inclusive) to 1.5.8(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:vault:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*
HashiCorp, Inc.
hashicorp
>>vault>>Versions from 1.6.0(inclusive) to 1.6.4(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:vault:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*
HashiCorp, Inc.
hashicorp
>>vault>>Versions from 1.6.0(inclusive) to 1.6.4(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:vault:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*
HashiCorp, Inc.
hashicorp
>>vault>>Versions from 1.7.0(inclusive) to 1.7.1(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:vault:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*
HashiCorp, Inc.
hashicorp
>>vault>>Versions from 1.7.0(inclusive) to 1.7.1(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:hashicorp:vault:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2021-09-vault-s-pki-engine-crl-may-exclude-revoked-but-unexpired-certificates-after-tidy/23461/2cve@mitre.org
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2021-09-vault-s-pki-engine-crl-may-exclude-revoked-but-unexpired-certificates-after-tidy/23461/2
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

152Records found

CVE-2017-15528
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Symantec - A Division of Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Symantec - A Division of Broadcom
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.23% / 45.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Nov, 2017 | 18:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Prior to v 7.6, the Install Norton Security (INS) product can be susceptible to a certificate spoofing vulnerability, which is a type of attack whereby a maliciously procured certificate binds the public key of an attacker to the domain name of the target.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nortonn/a
Product-install_norton_securityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-8286
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2020 | 19:39
Updated-15 Nov, 2024 | 15:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

curl 7.41.0 through 7.73.0 is vulnerable to an improper check for certificate revocation due to insufficient verification of the OCSP response.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxOracle CorporationSiemens AGSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)Apple Inc.CURLFedora Project
Product-libcurlpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolscommunications_billing_and_revenue_managementhci_storage_nodehci_storage_node_firmwarehci_bootstrap_osmacosuniversal_forwarderhci_compute_nodecommunications_cloud_native_core_policysolidfiresinec_infrastructure_network_servicesclustered_data_ontapsimatic_tim_1531_irc_firmwaredebian_linuxessbasehci_management_nodefedoramac_os_xsimatic_tim_1531_irchttps://github.com/curl/curl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-6071
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Nov, 2019 | 16:44
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 21:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

nuSOAP before 0.7.3-5 does not properly check the hostname of a cert.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nusoap_projectnusoapDebian GNU/Linux
Product-nusoapdebian_linuxnusoap
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2013-0264
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 35.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Dec, 2019 | 21:38
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 14:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An import error was introduced in Cumin in the code refactoring in r5310. Server certificate validation is always disabled when connecting to Aviary servers, even if the installed packages on a system support it.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cuminRed Hat, Inc.
Product-mrg_management_consolecumin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-26766
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.03% / 86.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2022 | 19:22
Updated-30 May, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A certificate parsing issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in tvOS 15.5, iOS 15.5 and iPadOS 15.5, Security Update 2022-004 Catalina, watchOS 8.6, macOS Big Sur 11.6.6, macOS Monterey 12.4. A malicious app may be able to bypass signature validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-mac_os_xwatchosipadosiphone_ostvosmacoswatchOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-24968
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 40.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Feb, 2022 | 18:16
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 04:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Mellium mellium.im/xmpp through 0.21.0, an attacker capable of spoofing DNS TXT records can redirect a WebSocket connection request to a server under their control without causing TLS certificate verification to fail. This occurs because the wrong host name is selected during this verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-melliumn/a
Product-xmppn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-25640
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-3.80% / 87.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 01:07
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 04:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, a TLS 1.3 server cannot properly enforce a requirement for mutual authentication. A client can simply omit the certificate_verify message from the handshake, and never present a certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-25638
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 19.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 01:06
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 04:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, certificate validation may be bypassed during attempted authentication by a TLS 1.3 client to a TLS 1.3 server. This occurs when the sig_algo field differs between the certificate_verify message and the certificate message.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-5812
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Feb, 2021 | 23:44
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Nessus AMI versions 8.12.0 and earlier were found to either not validate, or incorrectly validate, a certificate which could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aTenable, Inc.
Product-nessus_amazon_machine_imageTenable Nessus AMI
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-4340
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-3.1||LOW
EPSS-0.03% / 5.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2020 | 13:45
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM Security Secret Server prior to 10.9 could allow an attacker to bypass SSL security due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 178180.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft CorporationIBM Corporation
Product-windowssecurity_secret_serverSecurity Secret Server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36478
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 48.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). A NULL algorithm parameters entry looks identical to an array of REAL (size zero) and thus the certificate is considered valid. However, if the parameters do not match in any way, then the certificate should be considered invalid.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm LimitedDebian GNU/LinuxSiemens AG
Product-debian_linuxlogo\!_cmr2040_firmwaresimatic_rtu3031c_firmwaresimatic_rtu3030csimatic_rtu3041c_firmwaresimatic_rtu3041clogo\!_cmr2040simatic_rtu3000clogo\!_cmr2020simatic_rtu3031csimatic_rtu3000c_firmwarelogo\!_cmr2020_firmwaresimatic_rtu3030c_firmwarembed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36425
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 52.82%
||
7 Day CHG-0.03%
Published-19 Jul, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Arm Mbed TLS before 2.24.0. It incorrectly uses a revocationDate check when deciding whether to honor certificate revocation via a CRL. In some situations, an attacker can exploit this by changing the local clock.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxArm Limited
Product-mbed_tlsdebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-27589
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 41.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Nov, 2020 | 13:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Synopsys hub-rest-api-python (aka blackduck on PyPI) version 0.0.25 - 0.0.52 does not validate SSL certificates in certain cases.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-synopsysn/a
Product-hub-rest-api-pythonn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-1316
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.20% / 42.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jan, 2020 | 13:11
Updated-15 Nov, 2024 | 17:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance does not check for certificate revocation which could lead to MITM attacks

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ironport_web_security_applianceIronPort Web Security Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-9148
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 49.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jul, 2019 | 20:41
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Mailvelope prior to 3.3.0 accepts or operates with invalid PGP public keys: Mailvelope allows importing keys that contain users without a valid self-certification. Keys that are obviously invalid are not rejected during import. An attacker that is able to get a victim to import a manipulated key could claim to have signed a message that originates from another person.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mailvelopen/a
Product-mailvelopen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-8642
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-3.3||LOW
EPSS-0.09% / 25.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Oct, 2020 | 19:38
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue existed in the handling of S-MIME certificates. This issue was addressed with improved validation of S-MIME certificates. This issue is fixed in macOS Mojave 10.14.4, Security Update 2019-002 High Sierra, Security Update 2019-002 Sierra. Processing a maliciously crafted mail message may lead to S/MIME signature spoofing.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-mac_os_xmacOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-27820
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 12.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2025 | 11:44
Updated-04 Jun, 2025 | 11:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache HttpComponents: PSL (Public Suffix List) validation bypass

A bug in PSL validation logic in Apache HttpClient 5.4.x disables domain checks, affecting cookie management and host name verification. Discovered by the Apache HttpClient team. Fixed in the 5.4.3 release

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-Apache HttpComponents
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-5506
Matching Score-4
Assigner-NetApp, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-NetApp, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Oct, 2019 | 18:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.0 and higher do not enforce hostname verification under certain circumstances making them susceptible to impersonation via man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.
Product-clustered_data_ontapClustered Data ONTAP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-3762
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2020 | 18:20
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Data Protection Central versions 1.0, 1.0.1, 18.1, 18.2, and 19.1 contains an Improper Certificate Chain of Trust Vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability by obtaining a CA signed certificate from Data Protection Central to impersonate a valid system to compromise the integrity of data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_integrated_data_protection_applianceemc_data_protection_centralData Protection Central
CWE ID-CWE-296
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-19270
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Nov, 2019 | 03:34
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD through 1.3.6b. Failure to check for the appropriate field of a CRL entry (checking twice for subject, rather than once for subject and once for issuer) prevents some valid CRLs from being taken into account, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proftpdn/aFedora Project
Product-fedoraproftpdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-19271
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.53% / 66.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Nov, 2019 | 03:33
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD before 1.3.6. A wrong iteration variable, used when checking a client certificate against CRL entries (installed by a system administrator), can cause some CRL entries to be ignored, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proftpdn/a
Product-proftpdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-0867
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.87% / 82.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Jul, 2012 | 23:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

PostgreSQL 8.4.x before 8.4.11, 9.0.x before 9.0.7, and 9.1.x before 9.1.3 truncates the common name to only 32 characters when verifying SSL certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof connections when the host name is exactly 32 characters.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe PostgreSQL Global Development GroupRed Hat, Inc.openSUSEDebian GNU/Linux
Product-enterprise_linux_desktopenterprise_linux_server_ausenterprise_linux_hpc_nodeenterprise_linux_server_eusenterprise_linux_workstationdesktop_workstationpostgresqldebian_linuxopensuseenterprise_linuxenterprise_linux_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-29222
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 56.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 May, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in Pion DTLS

Pion DTLS is a Go implementation of Datagram Transport Layer Security. Prior to version 2.1.5, a DTLS Client could provide a Certificate that it doesn't posses the private key for and Pion DTLS wouldn't reject it. This issue affects users that are using Client certificates only. The connection itself is still secure. The Certificate provided by clients can't be trusted when using a Pion DTLS server prior to version 2.1.5. Users should upgrade to version 2.1.5 to receive a patch. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pionpion
Product-dtlsdtls
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-28142
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 19.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Mar, 2022 | 12:30
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 05:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins Proxmox Plugin 0.6.0 and earlier disables SSL/TLS certificate validation globally for the Jenkins controller JVM when configured to ignore SSL/TLS issues.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-proxmoxJenkins Proxmox Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-12496
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 May, 2019 | 10:59
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Hybrid Group Gobot before 1.13.0. The mqtt subsystem skips verification of root CA certificates by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hybridgroupn/a
Product-gobotn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11674
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Oct, 2019 | 14:42
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Man-in-the-middle vulnerability in Micro Focus Self Service Password Reset, affecting all versions prior to 4.4.0.4. The vulnerability could exploit invalid certificate validation and may result in a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMicro Focus International Limited
Product-netiq_self_service_password_resetSelf Service Password Reset (SSPR) versions prior to 4.4.0.4
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-38325
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.07% / 76.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jul, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-30 Oct, 2024 | 16:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The cryptography package before 41.0.2 for Python mishandles SSH certificates that have critical options.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cryptography.ion/a
Product-cryptographyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11497
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2019 | 17:24
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Couchbase Server 5.0.0, when an invalid Remote Cluster Certificate was entered as part of the reference creation, XDCR did not parse and check the certificate signature. It then accepted the invalid certificate and attempted to use it to establish future connections to the remote cluster. This has been fixed in version 5.5.0. XDCR now checks the validity of the certificate thoroughly and prevents a remote cluster reference from being created with an invalid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCouchbase, Inc.
Product-couchbase_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1010206
Matching Score-4
Assigner-7556d962-6fb7-411e-85fa-6cd62f095ba8
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-7556d962-6fb7-411e-85fa-6cd62f095ba8
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jul, 2019 | 13:30
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OSS Http Request (Apache Cordova Plugin) 6 is affected by: Missing SSL certificate validation. The impact is: certificate spoofing. The component is: use this library when https communication. The attack vector is: certificate spoofing.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-http_request_projectOSS
Product-http_requestHttp Request (Apache Cordova Plugin)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-47619
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 9.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 May, 2025 | 15:12
Updated-28 May, 2025 | 10:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
tranport: TLS host name wildcard matching too lax

syslog-ng is an enhanced log daemo. Prior to version 4.8.2, `tls_wildcard_match()` matches on certificates such as `foo.*.bar` although that is not allowed. It is also possible to pass partial wildcards such as `foo.a*c.bar` which glib matches but should be avoided / invalidated. This issue could have an impact on TLS connections, such as in man-in-the-middle situations. Version 4.8.2 contains a fix for the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-syslog-ng
Product-syslog-ng
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-9040
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jun, 2020 | 15:21
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Couchbase Server Java SDK before 2.7.1.1 allows a potential attacker to forge an SSL certificate and pose as the intended peer. An attacker can leverage this flaw by crafting a cryptographically valid certificate that will be accepted by Java SDK's Netty component due to missing hostname verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCouchbase, Inc.
Product-couchbase_server_java_sdkn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-27820
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 33.10%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Mar, 2022 | 03:33
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 05:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) through w2022-03-21 does not verify the TLS certificate chain of an HTTPS server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-owaspn/a
Product-zed_attack_proxyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-8020
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.58% / 80.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 01:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.0 to 1.2.16 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 has a flaw that does not properly check OCSP pre-produced responses, which are lists (multiple entries) of certificate statuses. Subsequently, revoked client certificates may not be properly identified, allowing for users to authenticate with revoked certificates to connections that require mutual TLS. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtomcat_nativeApache Tomcat Native
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-4086
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.33% / 54.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2018 | 06:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 05:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. iOS before 11.2.5 is affected. macOS before 10.13.3 is affected. tvOS before 11.2.5 is affected. watchOS before 4.2.2 is affected. The issue involves the "Security" component. It allows remote attackers to spoof certificate validation via crafted name constraints.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-apple_tviphone_oswatchosmac_os_xn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2007-5967
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 May, 2021 | 11:50
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 15:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw in Mozilla's embedded certificate code might allow web sites to install root certificates on devices without user approval.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMozilla Corporation
Product-firefoxMozilla Firefox
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-1343
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.51%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 May, 2022 | 15:15
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 17:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate

The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-h410saff_8700_firmwareactive_iq_unified_managerfas_8300_firmwarefas_500f_firmwareh500s_firmwareaff_a400aff_500fsantricity_smi-s_provideropensslh700sh500sfas_8700_firmwarea250_firmwareh700e_firmwareaff_8700h500e_firmwaresolidfire\,_enterprise_sds_\&_hci_storage_nodeclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorclustered_data_ontaph300eh300e_firmwareaff_500f_firmwaresolidfire_\&_hci_management_nodeaff_8300h700eh500eh700s_firmwarea700ssmi-s_providera250fas_8700fabric-attached_storage_a400_firmwaresnapmanagerh300sh410s_firmwarefas_8300h300s_firmwarefas_500faff_8300_firmwareaff_a400_firmwarea700s_firmwarefabric-attached_storage_a400OpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-27782
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 51.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 05:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libcurl would reuse a previously created connection even when a TLS or SSHrelated option had been changed that should have prohibited reuse.libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequenttransfers to reuse if one of them matches the setup. However, several TLS andSSH settings were left out from the configuration match checks, making themmatch too easily.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)CURL
Product-curluniversal_forwarderdebian_linuxhttps://github.com/curl/curl
CWE ID-CWE-840
Not Available
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1320
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jan, 2019 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Thrift Java client library versions 0.5.0 through 0.11.0 can bypass SASL negotiation isComplete validation in the org.apache.thrift.transport.TSaslTransport class. An assert used to determine if the SASL handshake had successfully completed could be disabled in production settings making the validation incomplete.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationF5, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-global_lifecycle_management_opatchdebian_linuxnosql_databasethrifttraffix_signaling_delivery_controllerApache Thrift
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0227
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 76.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Apr, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-29 Nov, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client Certificate Authentication feature for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection and bypass certain SSL certificate verification steps. The vulnerability is due to incorrect verification of the SSL Client Certificate. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to the ASA VPN without a proper private key and certificate pair. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection to the ASA when the connection should have been rejected. This vulnerability affects Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software that is running on the following Cisco products: 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliances (ISA), ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls, ASA Services Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliances (ASAv), Firepower 4110 Security Appliances, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Modules. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg40155.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-firepower_threat_defenseadaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco Adaptive Security Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7726
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jul, 2017 | 17:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

iSmartAlarm cube devices have an SSL Certificate Validation Vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ismartalarmn/a
Product-cubeone_firmwarecubeonen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-6594
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 47.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Aug, 2017 | 19:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The transit path validation code in Heimdal before 7.3 might allow attackers to bypass the capath policy protection mechanism by leveraging failure to add the previous hop realm to the transit path of issued tickets.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-heimdal_projectn/aopenSUSE
Product-leapheimdaln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-36377
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 29.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2021 | 12:11
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Fossil before 2.14.2 and 2.15.x before 2.15.2 often skips the hostname check during TLS certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fossil-scmn/aFedora Project
Product-fossilfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-31399
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.6||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 43.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Aug, 2021 | 12:05
Updated-30 May, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

On 2N Access Unit 2.0 2.31.0.40.5 devices, an attacker can pose as the web relay for a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-2nn/a
Product-access_unit_2.0access_unit_2.0_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25634
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2021 | 13:33
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timestamp Manipulation with Signature Wrapping

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to modify a digitally signed ODF document to insert an additional signing time timestamp which LibreOffice would incorrectly present as a valid signature signed at the bogus signing time. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25636
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect trust validation of signature with ambiguous KeyInfo children

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationFedora Project
Product-fedoralibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-36371
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.07% / 21.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jul, 2021 | 20:19
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Emissary-Ingress (formerly Ambassador API Gateway) through 1.13.9 allows attackers to bypass client certificate requirements (i.e., mTLS cert_required) on backend upstreams when more than one TLSContext is defined and at least one configuration exists that does not require client certificate authentication. The attacker must send an SNI specifying an unprotected backend and an HTTP Host header specifying a protected backend. (2.x versions are unaffected. 1.x versions are unaffected with certain configuration settings involving prune_unreachable_routes and a wildcard Host resource.)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-getambassadorn/a
Product-emissary-ingressn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3285
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-8.00% / 91.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2021 | 01:02
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 16:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

jxbrowser in TI Code Composer Studio IDE 8.x through 10.x before 10.1.1 does not verify X.509 certificates for HTTPS.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tin/a
Product-code_composer_studio_intgrated_development_environmentn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1837
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 26.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Sep, 2021 | 14:44
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 16:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A certificate validation issue was addressed. This issue is fixed in iOS 14.5 and iPadOS 14.5. An attacker in a privileged network position may be able to alter network traffic.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-iphone_osipadosiOS and iPadOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1277
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jan, 2021 | 19:56
Updated-12 Nov, 2024 | 20:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Data Center Network Manager Certificate Validation Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted host or construct a man-in-the-middle attack to extract sensitive information or alter certain API requests. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient certificate validation when establishing HTTPS requests with the affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-data_center_network_managerCisco Data Center Network Manager
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-9321
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2020 | 18:14
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

configurationwatcher.go in Traefik 2.x before 2.1.4 and TraefikEE 2.0.0 mishandles the purging of certificate contents from providers before logging.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-traefikn/a
Product-traefikn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found