Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2021-29656

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-18 Feb, 2022 | 21:47
Updated At-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected At-
Credits

Pexip Infinity Connect before 1.8.0 mishandles TLS certificate validation. The allow list is not properly checked.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:18 Feb, 2022 | 21:47
Updated At:03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

Pexip Infinity Connect before 1.8.0 mishandles TLS certificate validation. The allow list is not properly checked.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://docs.pexip.com/admin/security_bulletins.htm
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://docs.pexip.com/admin/security_bulletins.htm
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://docs.pexip.com/admin/security_bulletins.htm
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://docs.pexip.com/admin/security_bulletins.htm
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:18 Feb, 2022 | 22:15
Updated At:02 Mar, 2022 | 18:44

Pexip Infinity Connect before 1.8.0 mishandles TLS certificate validation. The allow list is not properly checked.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.19.8CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary2.07.5HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.8
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CPE Matches

pexip
pexip
>>infinity_connect>>Versions before 1.8.0(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:pexip:infinity_connect:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://docs.pexip.com/admin/security_bulletins.htmcve@mitre.org
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://docs.pexip.com/admin/security_bulletins.htm
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

80Records found

CVE-2018-11747
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.27% / 49.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2019 | 19:16
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 08:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Previously, Puppet Discovery was shipped with a default generated TLS certificate in the nginx container. In version 1.4.0, a unique certificate will be generated on installation or the user will be able to provide their own TLS certificate for ingress.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Perforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-discoveryPuppet Discovery
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-45100
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.45% / 62.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Feb, 2023 | 05:06
Updated-26 Mar, 2025 | 20:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 8.2.x-9.3.x, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a full compromise of the system.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_powerscale_onefsPowerScale OneFS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-31183
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.20% / 42.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2022 | 19:50
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 17:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
mTLS client verification is skipped in fs2 on Node.js

fs2 is a compositional, streaming I/O library for Scala. When establishing a server-mode `TLSSocket` using `fs2-io` on Node.js, the parameter `requestCert = true` is ignored, peer certificate verification is skipped, and the connection proceeds. The vulnerability is limited to: 1. `fs2-io` running on Node.js. The JVM TLS implementation is completely independent. 2. `TLSSocket`s in server-mode. Client-mode `TLSSocket`s are implemented via a different API. 3. mTLS as enabled via `requestCert = true` in `TLSParameters`. The default setting is `false` for server-mode `TLSSocket`s. It was introduced with the initial Node.js implementation of fs2-io in 3.1.0. A patch is released in v3.2.11. The requestCert = true parameter is respected and the peer certificate is verified. If verification fails, a SSLException is raised. If using an unpatched version on Node.js, do not use a server-mode TLSSocket with requestCert = true to establish a mTLS connection.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-typeleveltypelevel
Product-fs2fs2
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-28907
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.21% / 43.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 May, 2021 | 12:43
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Incorrect SSL certificate validation in Nagios Fusion 4.1.8 and earlier allows for Escalation of Privileges or Code Execution as root via vectors related to download of an untrusted update package in upgrade_to_latest.sh.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNagios Enterprises, LLC
Product-fusionn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-32878
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.04% / 12.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jun, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-08 Jul, 2025 | 14:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered on COROS PACE 3 devices through 3.0808.0. It implements a function to connect the watch to a WLAN. This function is mainly for downloading firmware files. Before downloading firmware files, the watch requests some information about the firmware via HTTPS from the back-end API. However, the X.509 server certificate within the TLS handshake is not validated by the device. This allows an attacker within an active machine-in-the-middle position, using a TLS proxy and a self-signed certificate, to eavesdrop and manipulate the HTTPS communication. This could be abused, for example, for stealing the API access token of the assigned user account.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-yftechn/a
Product-coros_pace_3_firmwarecoros_pace_3n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1000030
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.78% / 72.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Sep, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Pidgin version <2.11.0 contains a vulnerability in X.509 Certificates imports specifically due to improper check of return values from gnutls_x509_crt_init() and gnutls_x509_crt_import() that can result in code execution. This attack appear to be exploitable via custom X.509 certificate from another client. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 2.11.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSUSEPidgin
Product-linux_enterprise_serverpidginn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-7826
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.43% / 61.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Apr, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

botan 1.11.x before 1.11.22 improperly handles wildcard matching against hostnames, which might allow remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a valid X.509 certificate, as demonstrated by accepting *.example.com as a match for bar.foo.example.com.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-botan_projectn/a
Product-botann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-36041
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-4.7||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.87%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-15 Jun, 2025 | 12:51
Updated-24 Aug, 2025 | 11:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM MQ improper certificate validation

IBM MQ Operator LTS 2.0.0 through 2.0.29, MQ Operator CD 3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.1.0 through 3.1.3, 3.3.0, 3.4.0, 3.4.1, 3.5.0, 3.5.1 through 3.5.3, and MQ Operator SC2 3.2.0 through 3.2.12 Native HA CRR could be configured with a private key and chain other than the intended key which could disclose sensitive information or allow the attacker to perform unauthorized actions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-supplied_mq_advanced_container_imagesmq_operatorMQ Operator
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-9127
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.19% / 40.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Apr, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 07:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Botan 2.2.0 - 2.4.0 (fixed in 2.5.0) improperly handled wildcard certificates and could accept certain certificates as valid for hostnames when, under RFC 6125 rules, they should not match. This only affects certificates issued to the same domain as the host, so to impersonate a host one must already have a wildcard certificate matching other hosts in the same domain. For example, b*.example.com would match some hostnames that do not begin with a 'b' character.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-botan_projectn/a
Product-botann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-3886
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.02% / 76.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jul, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libinfinity before 0.6.6-1 does not validate expired SSL certificates, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libinfinity_projectn/a
Product-libinfinityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-29331
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.32% / 54.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jun, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-10 Jul, 2025 | 14:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue in MHSanaei 3x-ui before v.2.5.3 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the management script x-ui passes the no check certificate option to wget when downloading updates

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mhsanaein/a
Product-3x-uin/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-4991
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-2.27% / 83.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 May, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 05:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application versions 4.4.1.298 and earlier have an exploitable Improper certificate validation vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to a security bypass.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aAdobe Inc.
Product-creative_cloudCreative Cloud Desktop Application 4.4.1.298 and earlier versions
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-26493
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Drupal.org
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Drupal.org
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.08% / 24.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jun, 2022 | 16:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 05:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
miniOrange SAML Authentication Bypass

Xecurify's miniOrange Premium, Standard, and Enterprise Drupal SAML SP modules possess an authentication and authorization bypass vulnerability. An attacker with access to a HTTP-request intercepting method is able to bypass authentication and authorization by removing the SAML Assertion Signature - impersonating existing users and existing roles, including administrative users/roles. This vulnerability is not mitigated by configuring the module to enforce signatures or certificate checks. Xecurify recommends updating miniOrange modules to their most recent versions. This vulnerability is present in paid versions of the miniOrange Drupal SAML SP product affecting Drupal 7, 8, and 9.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-XecuifyThe Drupal Association
Product-saml_sp_2.0_single_sign_onDrupal 8 miniOrange SAML SPDrupal 9 miniOrange SAML SPDrupal 7 miniOrange SAML SP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-8531
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.32% / 54.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Oct, 2020 | 20:57
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A validation issue existed in Trust Anchor Management. This issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in watchOS 5.2, macOS Mojave 10.14.4, Security Update 2019-002 High Sierra, Security Update 2019-002 Sierra, iOS 12.2. An untrusted radius server certificate may be trusted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-mac_os_xiphone_oswatchosmacOSiOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-24715
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.20% / 42.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Aug, 2020 | 21:52
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Scalyr Agent before 2.1.10 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation because, in some circumstances, native Python code is used that lacks a comparison of the hostname to commonName and subjectAltName.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-scalyrn/a
Product-scalyr_agentn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-24714
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.22% / 44.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Aug, 2020 | 21:52
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Scalyr Agent before 2.1.10 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation because, in some circumstances, the openssl binary is called without the -verify_hostname option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-scalyrn/a
Product-scalyr_agentn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-1952
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.65% / 81.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Apr, 2020 | 16:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 06:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was found in Apache IoTDB .9.0 to 0.9.1 and 0.8.0 to 0.8.2. When starting IoTDB, the JMX port 31999 is exposed with no certification.Then, clients could execute code remotely.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-iotdbIoTDB
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-21654
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 18.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 22:35
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect configuration handling allows TLS session re-use without re-validation in Envoy

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. Envoy's tls allows re-use when some cert validation settings have changed from their default configuration. The only workaround for this issue is to ensure that default tls settings are used. Users are advised to upgrade.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyenvoyproxy
Product-envoyenvoy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-22885
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.62% / 68.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2022 | 21:56
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 03:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Hutool v5.7.18's HttpRequest was discovered to ignore all TLS/SSL certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hutooln/a
Product-hutooln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-12637
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.22% / 44.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 May, 2020 | 16:23
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Zulip Desktop before 5.2.0 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation because all validation was inadvertently disabled during an attempt to recognize the ignoreCerts option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-zulipchatn/a
Product-zulip_desktopn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-17301
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.22% / 44.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Feb, 2018 | 16:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 20:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Huawei AR120-S V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, AR1200 V200R005C20, V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, AR1200-S V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, AR150 V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, AR160 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, AR200 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R008C20, AR200-S V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, AR2200 V200R005C20, V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, AR2200-S V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, AR3200 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R006C11, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C00, V200R008C10, V200R008C20, V200R008C30, AR3600 V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R008C20, AR510 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, CloudEngine 12800 V100R003C00, V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, CloudEngine 5800 V100R003C00, V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, CloudEngine 6800 V100R003C00, V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, CloudEngine 7800 V100R003C00, V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, DP300 V500R002C00, SMC2.0 V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V500R002C00, SRG1300 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, SRG2300 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, SRG3300 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, TE30 V100R001C10, TE60 V100R003C00, V500R002C00, VP9660 V200R001C02, V200R001C30, V500R002C00, ViewPoint 8660 V100R008C02, V100R008C03, eSpace IAD V300R002C01, eSpace U1981 V200R003C20, V200R003C30, eSpace USM V100R001C01, V300R001C00 have a weak cryptography vulnerability. Due to not properly some values in the certificates, an unauthenticated remote attacker could forges a specific RSA certificate and exploits the vulnerability to pass identity authentication and logs into the target device to obtain permissions configured for the specific user name.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-ar2200_firmwarear1200te30_firmwarear3200_firmwarevp9660ar2200cloudengine_5800srg1300te60espace_usm_firmwaresrg1300_firmwareviewpoint_8660_firmwaresrg3300_firmwaresrg2300_firmwaresrg3300smc2.0_firmwarete30ar120-s_firmwarear1200-s_firmwarecloudengine_12800_firmwarecloudengine_7800espace_u1981_firmwaredp300ar200-sar120-scloudengine_6800ar510cloudengine_12800espace_u1981ar160te60_firmwaresrg2300ar150_firmwarear2200-sar510_firmwarear1200-sar3600ar150ar3200cloudengine_6800_firmwarecloudengine_7800_firmwaresmc2.0dp300_firmwareespace_usmar1200_firmwarear200-s_firmwarear200espace_iadar3600_firmwarear160_firmwarear2200-s_firmwarecloudengine_5800_firmwarevp9660_firmwareespace_iad_firmwareviewpoint_8660ar200_firmwareAR120-S,AR1200,AR1200-S,AR150,AR160,AR200,AR200-S,AR2200,AR2200-S,AR3200,AR3600,AR510,CloudEngine 12800,CloudEngine 5800,CloudEngine 6800,CloudEngine 7800,DP300,SMC2.0,SRG1300,SRG2300,SRG3300,TE30,TE60,VP9660,ViewPoint 8660,eSpace IAD,eSpace U1981,eSpace USM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-43882
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-9||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.58% / 67.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Dec, 2021 | 14:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-defender_for_iotMicrosoft Defender for IoT
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-37437
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.26% / 48.97%
||
7 Day CHG-0.03%
Published-16 Aug, 2022 | 19:50
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 20:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Ingest Actions UI in Splunk Enterprise 9.0.0 disabled TLS certificate validation

When using Ingest Actions to configure a destination that resides on Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) in Splunk Web, TLS certificate validation is not correctly performed and tested for the destination. The vulnerability only affects connections between Splunk Enterprise and an Ingest Actions Destination through Splunk Web and only applies to environments that have configured TLS certificate validation. It does not apply to Destinations configured directly in the outputs.conf configuration file. The vulnerability affects Splunk Enterprise version 9.0.0 and does not affect versions below 9.0.0, including the 8.1.x and 8.2.x versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkSplunk Enterprise
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-2320
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-4.83% / 89.10%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jan, 2018 | 19:00
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 05:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The TLS stack in Mono before 3.12.1 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors related to client-side SSLv2 fallback.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mono-projectn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxmonon/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-35898
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.09% / 26.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 May, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-30 Jan, 2025 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenText BizManager before 16.6.0.1 does not perform proper validation during the change-password operation. This allows any authenticated user to change the password of any other user, including the Administrator account.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOpen Text Corporation
Product-bizmanagern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CVE-2024-49369
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-17.66% / 94.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2024 | 16:44
Updated-13 Nov, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Icinga 2 has a TLS Certificate Validation Bypass for JSON-RPC and HTTP API Connections

Icinga is a monitoring system which checks the availability of network resources, notifies users of outages, and generates performance data for reporting. The TLS certificate validation in all Icinga 2 versions starting from 2.4.0 was flawed, allowing an attacker to impersonate both trusted cluster nodes as well as any API users that use TLS client certificates for authentication (ApiUser objects with the client_cn attribute set). This vulnerability has been fixed in v2.14.3, v2.13.10, v2.12.11, and v2.11.12.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Icingaicinga
Product-icinga2icinga_web_2
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-33907
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-4.39% / 88.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2021 | 13:55
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Zoom Client for Meetings for Windows in all versions before 5.3.0 fails to properly validate the certificate information used to sign .msi files when performing an update of the client. This could lead to remote code execution in an elevated privileged context.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aZoom Communications, Inc.
Product-meetingsZoom Client for Meetings for Windows
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-31597
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.4||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.37% / 58.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Apr, 2021 | 23:52
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The xmlhttprequest-ssl package before 1.6.1 for Node.js disables SSL certificate validation by default, because rejectUnauthorized (when the property exists but is undefined) is considered to be false within the https.request function of Node.js. In other words, no certificate is ever rejected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-xmlhttprequest-ssl_projectn/a
Product-xmlhttprequest-ssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29504
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.85% / 73.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jun, 2021 | 20:50
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in WP-CLI framework

WP-CLI is the command-line interface for WordPress. An improper error handling in HTTPS requests management in WP-CLI version 0.12.0 and later allows remote attackers able to intercept the communication to remotely disable the certificate verification on WP-CLI side, gaining full control over the communication content, including the ability to impersonate update servers and push malicious updates towards WordPress instances controlled by the vulnerable WP-CLI agent, or push malicious updates toward WP-CLI itself. The vulnerability stems from the fact that the default behavior of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` when encountering a TLS handshake error is to disable certificate validation and retry the same request. The default behavior has been changed with version 2.5.0 of WP-CLI and the `wp-cli/wp-cli` framework (via https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523) so that the `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` method accepts an `$insecure` option that is `false` by default and consequently that a TLS handshake failure is a hard error by default. This new default is a breaking change and ripples through to all consumers of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()`, including those in separate WP-CLI bundled or third-party packages. https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523 has also added an `--insecure` flag to the `cli update` command to counter this breaking change. There is no direct workaround for the default insecure behavior of `wp-cli/wp-cli` versions before 2.5.0. The workaround for dealing with the breaking change in the commands directly affected by the new secure default behavior is to add the `--insecure` flag to manually opt-in to the previous insecure behavior.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wp-cliwp-cli
Product-wp-cliwp-cli
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-24012
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jun, 2021 | 12:42
Updated-25 Oct, 2024 | 13:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper following of a certificate's chain of trust vulnerability in FortiGate versions 6.4.0 to 6.4.4 may allow an LDAP user to connect to SSLVPN with any certificate that is signed by a trusted Certificate Authority.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortiosFortinet FortiOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found