Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2021-29504

Summary
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At-07 Jun, 2021 | 20:50
Updated At-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected At-
Credits

Improper Certificate Validation in WP-CLI framework

WP-CLI is the command-line interface for WordPress. An improper error handling in HTTPS requests management in WP-CLI version 0.12.0 and later allows remote attackers able to intercept the communication to remotely disable the certificate verification on WP-CLI side, gaining full control over the communication content, including the ability to impersonate update servers and push malicious updates towards WordPress instances controlled by the vulnerable WP-CLI agent, or push malicious updates toward WP-CLI itself. The vulnerability stems from the fact that the default behavior of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` when encountering a TLS handshake error is to disable certificate validation and retry the same request. The default behavior has been changed with version 2.5.0 of WP-CLI and the `wp-cli/wp-cli` framework (via https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523) so that the `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` method accepts an `$insecure` option that is `false` by default and consequently that a TLS handshake failure is a hard error by default. This new default is a breaking change and ripples through to all consumers of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()`, including those in separate WP-CLI bundled or third-party packages. https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523 has also added an `--insecure` flag to the `cli update` command to counter this breaking change. There is no direct workaround for the default insecure behavior of `wp-cli/wp-cli` versions before 2.5.0. The workaround for dealing with the breaking change in the commands directly affected by the new secure default behavior is to add the `--insecure` flag to manually opt-in to the previous insecure behavior.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID:a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At:07 Jun, 2021 | 20:50
Updated At:03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Improper Certificate Validation in WP-CLI framework

WP-CLI is the command-line interface for WordPress. An improper error handling in HTTPS requests management in WP-CLI version 0.12.0 and later allows remote attackers able to intercept the communication to remotely disable the certificate verification on WP-CLI side, gaining full control over the communication content, including the ability to impersonate update servers and push malicious updates towards WordPress instances controlled by the vulnerable WP-CLI agent, or push malicious updates toward WP-CLI itself. The vulnerability stems from the fact that the default behavior of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` when encountering a TLS handshake error is to disable certificate validation and retry the same request. The default behavior has been changed with version 2.5.0 of WP-CLI and the `wp-cli/wp-cli` framework (via https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523) so that the `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` method accepts an `$insecure` option that is `false` by default and consequently that a TLS handshake failure is a hard error by default. This new default is a breaking change and ripples through to all consumers of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()`, including those in separate WP-CLI bundled or third-party packages. https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523 has also added an `--insecure` flag to the `cli update` command to counter this breaking change. There is no direct workaround for the default insecure behavior of `wp-cli/wp-cli` versions before 2.5.0. The workaround for dealing with the breaking change in the commands directly affected by the new secure default behavior is to add the `--insecure` flag to manually opt-in to the previous insecure behavior.

Affected Products
Vendor
wp-cli
Product
wp-cli
Versions
Affected
  • < 2.5.0
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-295CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-295
Description: CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.19.1CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.1
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-rwgm-f83r-v3qj
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/wp-cli/checksum-command/pull/86
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/wp-cli/config-command/pull/128
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/wp-cli/core-command/pull/186
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/wp-cli/extension-command/pull/287
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/wp-cli/package-command/pull/138
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-rwgm-f83r-v3qj
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/checksum-command/pull/86
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/config-command/pull/128
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/core-command/pull/186
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/extension-command/pull/287
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/package-command/pull/138
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-rwgm-f83r-v3qj
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://github.com/wp-cli/checksum-command/pull/86
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/wp-cli/config-command/pull/128
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/wp-cli/core-command/pull/186
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/wp-cli/extension-command/pull/287
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/wp-cli/package-command/pull/138
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-rwgm-f83r-v3qj
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/checksum-command/pull/86
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/config-command/pull/128
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/core-command/pull/186
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/extension-command/pull/287
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/package-command/pull/138
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security-advisories@github.com
Published At:07 Jun, 2021 | 21:15
Updated At:17 Jun, 2021 | 15:33

WP-CLI is the command-line interface for WordPress. An improper error handling in HTTPS requests management in WP-CLI version 0.12.0 and later allows remote attackers able to intercept the communication to remotely disable the certificate verification on WP-CLI side, gaining full control over the communication content, including the ability to impersonate update servers and push malicious updates towards WordPress instances controlled by the vulnerable WP-CLI agent, or push malicious updates toward WP-CLI itself. The vulnerability stems from the fact that the default behavior of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` when encountering a TLS handshake error is to disable certificate validation and retry the same request. The default behavior has been changed with version 2.5.0 of WP-CLI and the `wp-cli/wp-cli` framework (via https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523) so that the `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` method accepts an `$insecure` option that is `false` by default and consequently that a TLS handshake failure is a hard error by default. This new default is a breaking change and ripples through to all consumers of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()`, including those in separate WP-CLI bundled or third-party packages. https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523 has also added an `--insecure` flag to the `cli update` command to counter this breaking change. There is no direct workaround for the default insecure behavior of `wp-cli/wp-cli` versions before 2.5.0. The workaround for dealing with the breaking change in the commands directly affected by the new secure default behavior is to add the `--insecure` flag to manually opt-in to the previous insecure behavior.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Secondary3.19.1CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary2.07.5HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.1
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CPE Matches

wp-cli
wp-cli
>>wp-cli>>Versions from 0.12.0(inclusive) to 2.5.0(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:wp-cli:wp-cli:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/wp-cli/checksum-command/pull/86security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/wp-cli/config-command/pull/128security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/wp-cli/core-command/pull/186security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/wp-cli/extension-command/pull/287security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/wp-cli/package-command/pull/138security-advisories@github.com
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-rwgm-f83r-v3qjsecurity-advisories@github.com
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/checksum-command/pull/86
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/config-command/pull/128
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/core-command/pull/186
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/extension-command/pull/287
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/package-command/pull/138
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-rwgm-f83r-v3qj
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

179Records found

CVE-2026-32144
Matching Score-4
Assigner-6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
CVSS Score-7.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 11.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Apr, 2026 | 12:28
Updated-27 May, 2026 | 15:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification. The OCSP response validation in public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 does not verify that a CA-designated responder certificate was cryptographically signed by the issuing CA. Instead, it only checks that the responder certificate's issuer name matches the CA's subject name and that the certificate has the OCSPSigning extended key usage. An attacker who can intercept or control OCSP responses can create a self-signed certificate with a matching issuer name and the OCSPSigning EKU, and use it to forge OCSP responses that mark revoked certificates as valid. This affects SSL/TLS clients using OCSP stapling, which may accept connections to servers with revoked certificates, potentially transmitting sensitive data to compromised servers. Applications using the public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 API directly are also affected, with impact depending on usage context. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/public_key/src/pubkey_ocsp.erl and program routines pubkey_ocsp:is_authorized_responder/3. This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.0 until OTP 28.4.2 and 27.3.4.10 corresponding to public_key from 1.16 until 1.20.3 and 1.17.1.2, and ssl from 11.2 until 11.5.4 and 11.2.12.7.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-erlangErlang
Product-erlang\/public_keyerlang\/sslerlang\/otpOTP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-26911
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.09% / 61.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Feb, 2021 | 20:54
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

core/imap/MCIMAPSession.cpp in Canary Mail before 3.22 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation for IMAP in STARTTLS mode.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libmailcorecanarymailn/a
Product-canary_mailmailcore2n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2003-1229
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-4.63% / 90.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Aug, 2005 | 04:00
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 00:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

X509TrustManager in (1) Java Secure Socket Extension (JSSE) in SDK and JRE 1.4.0 through 1.4.0_01, (2) JSSE before 1.0.3, (3) Java Plug-in SDK and JRE 1.3.0 through 1.4.1, and (4) Java Web Start 1.0 through 1.2 incorrectly calls the isClientTrusted method when determining server trust, which results in improper validation of digital certificate and allows remote attackers to (1) falsely authenticate peers for SSL or (2) incorrectly validate signed JAR files.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOracle CorporationSun Microsystems (Oracle Corporation)
Product-jssejrejava_web_startn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-21029
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-3.14% / 86.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Oct, 2019 | 21:46
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 13:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

systemd 239 through 245 accepts any certificate signed by a trusted certificate authority for DNS Over TLS. Server Name Indication (SNI) is not sent, and there is no hostname validation with the GnuTLS backend. NOTE: This has been disputed by the developer as not a vulnerability since hostname validation does not have anything to do with this issue (i.e. there is no hostname to be sent)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-systemd_projectn/aFedora Project
Product-fedorasystemdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-31892
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.49% / 38.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jul, 2021 | 11:02
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SINUMERIK Analyse MyCondition (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-Monitor (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-Tuning (All versions), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 02 (All versions >= V02.00.12 < 02.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 03 (All versions >= V03.00.12 < 03.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 04 (V04.00.02 and all versions >= V04.00.15 < 04.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 4.1 (All versions < V4.1 SP10 HF3), SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 5.1 (V5.1), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Remote (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Spindel Monitor (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyPrograms (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /Programs (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /Tools (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyTools (All versions), SINUMERIK Operate V4.8 (All versions < V4.8 SP8), SINUMERIK Operate V4.93 (All versions < V4.93 HF7), SINUMERIK Operate V4.94 (All versions < V4.94 HF5), SINUMERIK Optimize MyProgramming /NX-Cam Editor (All versions). Due to an error in a third-party dependency the ssl flags used for setting up a TLS connection to a server are overwitten with wrong settings. This results in a missing validation of the server certificate and thus in a possible TLS MITM szenario.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sinumerik_manage_mytoolssinumerik_manage_myprogramssinumerik_integrate_clientsinumerik_analyse_myconditionsinumerik_manage_myresources_firmwaresinumerik_analyse_mycondition_firmwaresinumerik_manage_mytools_firmwaresinumerik_optimize_myprogramming_firmwaresinumerik_manage_mymachinessinumerik_optimize_myprogrammingsinumerik_analyze_myperformance_firmwaresinumerik_analyze_myperformancesinumerik_integrate_client_firmwaresinumerik_integrate_for_productionsinumerik_manage_myresourcessinumerik_manage_mymachines_firmwaresinumerik_operate_firmwaresinumerik_integrate_for_production_firmwaresinumerik_operatesinumerik_manage_myprograms_firmwareSINUMERIK Analyse MyConditionSINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-TuningSINUMERIK Operate V4.94SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Spindel MonitorSINUMERIK Integrate Client 02SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /ProgramsSINUMERIK Integrate for Production 5.1SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 4.1SINUMERIK Optimize MyProgramming /NX-Cam EditorSINUMERIK Manage MyResources /ToolsSINUMERIK Manage MyMachinesSINUMERIK Operate V4.93SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformanceSINUMERIK Operate V4.8SINUMERIK Integrate Client 03SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-MonitorSINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /RemoteSINUMERIK Manage MyProgramsSINUMERIK Integrate Client 04SINUMERIK Manage MyTools
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-7821
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Ivanti
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Ivanti
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.51% / 39.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 May, 2026 | 15:26
Updated-07 May, 2026 | 20:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper certificate validation in Ivanti EPMM before versions 12.6.1.1, 12.7.0.1, and 12.8.0.1 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to enroll a device belonging to a restricted set of unenrolled devices, leading to information disclosure about EPMM appliance and impacting on the integrity of the newly enrolled device identity.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ivanti Software
Product-endpoint_manager_mobileEndpoint Manager Mobile
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-25160
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.23% / 14.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Feb, 2026 | 19:40
Updated-05 Feb, 2026 | 14:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Alist has Insecure TLS Config

Alist is a file list program that supports multiple storages, powered by Gin and Solidjs. Prior to version 3.57.0, the application disables TLS certificate verification by default for all outgoing storage driver communications, making the system vulnerable to Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks. This enables the complete decryption, theft, and manipulation of all data transmitted during storage operations, severely compromising the confidentiality and integrity of user data. This issue has been patched in version 3.57.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-AlistGo
Product-alist
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-24281
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.31% / 22.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Mar, 2026 | 08:50
Updated-10 Mar, 2026 | 18:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache ZooKeeper: Reverse-DNS fallback enables hostname verification bypass in ZooKeeper ZKTrustManager

Hostname verification in Apache ZooKeeper ZKTrustManager falls back to reverse DNS (PTR) when IP SAN validation fails, allowing attackers who control or spoof PTR records to impersonate ZooKeeper servers or clients with a valid certificate for the PTR name. It's important to note that attacker must present a certificate which is trusted by ZKTrustManager which makes the attack vector harder to exploit. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.6 or 3.9.5, which fixes this issue by introducing a new configuration option to disable reverse DNS lookup in client and quorum protocols.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-zookeeperApache ZooKeeper
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-350
Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action
CVE-2022-43705
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.41% / 33.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-25 Apr, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Botan before 2.19.3, it is possible to forge OCSP responses due to a certificate verification error. This issue was introduced in Botan 1.11.34 (November 2016).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-botan_projectn/a
Product-botann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-12829
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-5.07% / 91.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Aug, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 08:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application before 4.6.1 has an improper certificate validation vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to privilege escalation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aAdobe Inc.
Product-creative_cloudAdobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application before 4.6.1
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-11747
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.72% / 49.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2019 | 19:16
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 08:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Previously, Puppet Discovery was shipped with a default generated TLS certificate in the nginx container. In version 1.4.0, a unique certificate will be generated on installation or the user will be able to provide their own TLS certificate for ingress.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Perforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-discoveryPuppet Discovery
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-39948
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.28% / 19.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2023 | 18:06
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 20:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions and FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, 2.0 all versions, 1.2 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the FortiOS/FortiProxy device and remote servers hosting threat feeds (when the latter are configured as Fabric connectors in FortiOS/FortiProxy)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortiproxyfortiosFortiOSFortiProxy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-48697
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 5.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-27 May, 2026 | 15:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

FastNetMon Community Edition through 1.2.9 does not verify TLS certificates on outbound HTTPS connections. The execute_web_request_secure() function in src/fast_library.cpp creates a boost::asio::ssl::context with tls_client mode and calls set_default_verify_paths() to load CA certificates, but never calls set_verify_mode(boost::asio::ssl::verify_peer). Without this call, OpenSSL performs the TLS handshake without validating the server's certificate chain, making all HTTPS connections vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks. This function is used for telemetry reporting to community-stats.fastnetmon.com, which sends system information including CPU model, kernel version, traffic statistics, and software configuration. An attacker can intercept and modify this data or redirect it to a malicious server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pavel-odintsovn/a
Product-fastnetmonn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-50752
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Check Point Software Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Check Point Software Ltd.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-4.86% / 90.89%
||
7 Day CHG+0.61%
Published-08 Jun, 2026 | 11:00
Updated-10 Jun, 2026 | 13:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate Validation Bypass in VPN Site-to-Site Connections Using IKEv1

A weakness in the certificate validation logic of the deprecated IKEv1 key exchange may allow an unauthenticated attacker positioned as a man-in-the-middle to bypass certificate validation in VPN site-to-site connections that use certificate-based authentication. Successful exploitation could allow interception or modification of traffic traversing the VPN tunnel.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Product-Quantum Security GatewaySpark Firewalls
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-34865
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.37% / 28.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Aug, 2022 | 17:48
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Traffic intelligence feeds vulnerability CVE-2022-34865

In BIG-IP Versions 15.1.x before 15.1.6.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.5, and all versions of 13.1.x, Traffic Intelligence feeds, which use HTTPS, do not verify the remote endpoint identity, allowing for potential data poisoning. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-F5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_application_acceleration_managerbig-ip_link_controllerbig-ip_policy_enforcement_managerbig-ip_fraud_protection_servicebig-ip_global_traffic_managerbig-ip_analyticsbig-ip_access_policy_managerbig-ip_domain_name_systembig-ip_local_traffic_managerbig-ip_advanced_firewall_managerbig-ip_application_security_managerBIG-IP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.74% / 49.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-25 Feb, 2026 | 16:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder CLI connections lacked TLS cert validation

In Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder versions before 9.0, the Splunk command-line interface (CLI) did not validate TLS certificates while connecting to a remote Splunk platform instance by default. After updating to version 9.0, see Configure TLS host name validation for the Splunk CLI https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation#Configure_TLS_host_name_validation_for_the_Splunk_CLI to enable the remediation. The vulnerability does not affect the Splunk Cloud Platform. At the time of publishing, we have no evidence of exploitation of this vulnerability by external parties. The issue requires conditions beyond the control of a potential bad actor such as a machine-in-the-middle attack. Hence, Splunk rates the complexity of the attack as High.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkuniversal_forwarderSplunk EnterpriseUniversal Forwarder
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32151
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.73% / 49.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:46
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise disabled TLS validation using the CA certificate stores in Python 3 libraries by default

The httplib and urllib Python libraries that Splunk shipped with Splunk Enterprise did not validate certificates using the certificate authority (CA) certificate stores by default in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203. Python 3 client libraries now verify server certificates by default and use the appropriate CA certificate stores for each library. Apps and add-ons that include their own HTTP libraries are not affected. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk EnterpriseSplunk Cloud Platform
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-24012
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.48% / 37.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jun, 2021 | 12:42
Updated-25 Oct, 2024 | 13:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper following of a certificate's chain of trust vulnerability in FortiGate versions 6.4.0 to 6.4.4 may allow an LDAP user to connect to SSLVPN with any certificate that is signed by a trusted Certificate Authority.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortiosFortinet FortiOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-43550
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 60.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Oct, 2024 | 17:35
Updated-09 Jun, 2026 | 18:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_21h2windows_10_1809windows_server_2016windows_server_2022_23h2windows_server_2012windows_10_1507windows_11_21h2windows_11_24h2windows_10_22h2windows_server_2022windows_11_22h2windows_server_2019windows_10_1607windows_11_23h2Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2016Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 version 21H2Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2022Windows Server 2012Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2012 R2
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-11043
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.21% / 10.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2026 | 15:52
Updated-26 Jan, 2026 | 15:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Server Certificate Validation in Automation Studio

An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the OPC-UA client and ANSL over TLS client used in Automation Studio versions before 6.5 could allow an unauthenticated attacker on the network to position themselves to intercept and interfere with data exchanges.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-B&R Industrial Automation GmbH
Product-B&R Automation Studio
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-2800
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-8.53% / 94.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A specially crafted x509 certificate can cause a single out of bounds byte overwrite in wolfSSL through 3.10.2 resulting in potential certificate validation vulnerabilities, denial of service and possible remote code execution. In order to trigger this vulnerability, the attacker needs to supply a malicious x509 certificate to either a server or a client application using this library.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfsslwolfSSL
Product-wolfsslwolfSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-42011
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 30.25%
||
7 Day CHG+0.08%
Published-07 May, 2026 | 13:51
Updated-16 Jun, 2026 | 21:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Gnutls: gnutls: security bypass due to incorrect name constraint handling

A flaw was found in gnutls. This vulnerability occurs because permitted name constraints were incorrectly ignored when previous Certificate Authorities (CAs) only had excluded name constraints. A remote attacker could exploit this to bypass critical name constraint checks during certificate validation. This bypass could lead to the acceptance of invalid certificates, potentially enabling spoofing or man-in-the-middle attacks against affected systems.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Hardened ImagesRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-38861
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Checkmk GmbH
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Checkmk GmbH
CVSS Score-4.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 8.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2024 | 08:11
Updated-20 Dec, 2024 | 18:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Lack of TLS validation in plugin MikroTik on Checkmk Exchange

Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin MikroTik allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic. This issue affects MikroTik: from 2.0.0 through 2.5.5, from 0.4a_mk through 2.0a.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tomtretbar
Product-mikrotik
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-9697
Matching Score-4
Assigner-ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 19.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jun, 2026 | 16:46
Updated-23 Jun, 2026 | 05:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
undici vulnerable to TLS certificate validation bypass via dropped requestTls in SOCKS5 ProxyAgent

Impact: undici's ProxyAgent silently drops the requestTls option when configured with a SOCKS5 proxy URI (socks5:// or socks://). The target HTTPS connection through the SOCKS5 tunnel falls back to Node's default trust store, ignoring user-configured ca, cert, key, rejectUnauthorized, and servername settings. Applications that pin to an internal or corporate CA via requestTls.ca will, when their proxy URI is SOCKS5, get the default Mozilla CA bundle as the trust anchor instead. Any cert signed by any publicly-trusted CA for the target hostname is accepted, breaking the intended pin and enabling MITM read and tamper of the HTTPS exchange. Affected applications are those that use undici's ProxyAgent (or Socks5ProxyAgent directly) with SOCKS5 AND rely on requestTls for TLS scope restriction. The bug was introduced in undici 7.23.0 when SOCKS5 support was added. Patches: Upgrade to undici v7.28.0 or v8.5.0. Workarounds: No workaround is available within the SOCKS5 path. If a SOCKS5 proxy with TLS scope restriction is required and an upgrade is not yet possible, route the traffic through an HTTP-proxy ProxyAgent instead, where requestTls is honored correctly.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-undici
Product-undici
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-22885
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.28% / 66.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2022 | 21:56
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 03:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Hutool v5.7.18's HttpRequest was discovered to ignore all TLS/SSL certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hutooln/a
Product-hutooln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-21654
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.06% / 60.19%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 22:35
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect configuration handling allows TLS session re-use without re-validation in Envoy

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. Envoy's tls allows re-use when some cert validation settings have changed from their default configuration. The only workaround for this issue is to ensure that default tls settings are used. Users are advised to upgrade.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyenvoyproxy
Product-envoyenvoy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-5787
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Ivanti
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Ivanti
CVSS Score-8.9||HIGH
EPSS-0.69% / 47.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 May, 2026 | 15:36
Updated-08 May, 2026 | 03:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An Improper Certificate Validation in Ivanti EPMM before versions 12.6.1.1, 12.7.0.1, and 12.8.0.1 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to impersonate registered Sentry hosts and obtain valid CA-signed client certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ivanti Software
Product-endpoint_manager_mobileEndpoint Manager Mobile
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-22156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.55% / 41.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2022 | 00:20
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: Certificate validation is skipped when fetching system scripts from a HTTPS URL

An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Person-in-the-Middle (PitM) attacks when a system script is fetched from a remote source at a specified HTTPS URL, which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. The following command can be executed by an administrator via the CLI to refresh a script from a remote location, which is affected from this vulnerability: >request system scripts refresh-from (commit | event | extension-service | op | snmp) file filename url <https-url> This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS All versions prior to 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S9; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S3, 19.1R3-S7; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S7, 19.2R3-S3; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S4; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S7; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2-S2, 20.1R3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R2-S1, 20.3R3; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R2; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R1-S1, 21.1R2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-junosJunos OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-300
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint
CWE ID-CWE-358
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
CVE-2024-3738
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.52% / 39.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Apr, 2024 | 17:31
Updated-21 Aug, 2025 | 00:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
cym1102 nginxWebUI saveCmd handlePath certificate validation

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in cym1102 nginxWebUI up to 3.9.9. This affects the function handlePath of the file /adminPage/conf/saveCmd. The manipulation of the argument nginxPath leads to improper certificate validation. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-260577 was assigned to this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nginxWebUI (cym1102)Nginx UI (0xJacky)
Product-nginxwebuinginxWebUInginx_ui
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-5194
Matching Score-4
Assigner-wolfSSL Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-wolfSSL Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.47% / 36.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Apr, 2026 | 19:30
Updated-23 May, 2026 | 22:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
wolfSSL ECDSA Certificate Verification

Missing hash/digest size and OID checks allow digests smaller than allowed when verifying ECDSA certificates, or smaller than is appropriate for the relevant key type, to be accepted by signature verification functions. This could lead to reduced security of ECDSA certificate-based authentication if the public CA key used is also known. This affects ECDSA/ECC verification when EdDSA or ML-DSA is also enabled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfsslwolfSSL
Product-wolfsslwolfSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-53475
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.25% / 16.37%
||
7 Day CHG+0.09%
Published-10 Jun, 2026 | 13:55
Updated-16 Jun, 2026 | 14:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Assisted-migration-agent: tls verification disabled on all vcenter connections

A flaw was found in assisted-migration-agent. The application hardcodes insecure Transport Layer Security (TLS) connections when communicating with vCenter. This vulnerability allows a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacker to intercept and harvest vCenter administrator credentials. This can lead to unauthorized access to vCenter.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-kubev2v
Product-assisted_migration_agent
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-18911
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.67% / 47.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jun, 2020 | 18:45
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 21:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 3.8.2, 3.7.5, and 3.6.7. The X.509 certificate validation can be skipped for a TLS-based e-mail server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMattermost, Inc.
Product-mattermost_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-21656
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.77% / 50.74%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 22:25
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X.509 subjectAltName matching bypass in Envoy

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. The default_validator.cc implementation used to implement the default certificate validation routines has a "type confusion" bug when processing subjectAltNames. This processing allows, for example, an rfc822Name or uniformResourceIndicator to be authenticated as a domain name. This confusion allows for the bypassing of nameConstraints, as processed by the underlying OpenSSL/BoringSSL implementation, exposing the possibility of impersonation of arbitrary servers. As a result Envoy will trust upstream certificates that should not be trusted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyenvoyproxy
Product-envoyenvoy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-843
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CVE-2022-20814
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.90% / 54.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Nov, 2024 | 15:32
Updated-31 Jul, 2025 | 15:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence VCS Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the certificate validation of Cisco&nbsp;Expressway-C and Cisco&nbsp;TelePresence VCS could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data.&nbsp;&nbsp;The vulnerability is due to a lack of validation of the SSL server certificate that an affected device receives when it establishes a connection to a Cisco&nbsp;Unified Communications Manager device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a man-in-the-middle technique to intercept the traffic between the devices, and then using a self-signed certificate to impersonate the endpoint. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view the intercepted traffic in clear text or alter the contents of the traffic. Note: Cisco&nbsp;Expressway-E is not affected by this vulnerability.Cisco&nbsp;has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-telepresence_video_communication_serverCisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) Expresswaytelepresence_video_communication_server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-45389
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 8.83%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-15 Jun, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-17 Jun, 2026 | 15:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In OCaml-TLS before 2.1.0, the server implementation does insufficient checks of the certificate provided by the client (when doing client authentication), which allows impersonation with certificates that are not meant for client authentication (because of KeyUsage and ExtendedKeyUsage).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/a
Product-n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-45388
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.22% / 12.88%
||
7 Day CHG+0.08%
Published-15 Jun, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-16 Jun, 2026 | 15:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In OCaml-TLS before 2.1.0, the client implementation does insufficient checks of the certificate provided by the server, which allows impersonation with certificates that are not meant for server authentication (because of KeyUsage and ExtendedKeyUsage).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/a
Product-n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-9868
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.03% / 59.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Oct, 2020 | 17:54
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A certificate validation issue existed when processing administrator added certificates. This issue was addressed with improved certificate validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 13.6 and iPadOS 13.6, macOS Catalina 10.15.6, tvOS 13.4.8, watchOS 6.2.8. An attacker may have been able to impersonate a trusted website using shared key material for an administrator added certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-iphone_oswatchostvosipadosmac_os_xtvOSmacOSwatchOSiOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-17301
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.99% / 58.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Feb, 2018 | 16:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 20:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Huawei AR120-S V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, AR1200 V200R005C20, V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, AR1200-S V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, AR150 V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, AR160 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, AR200 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R008C20, AR200-S V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, AR2200 V200R005C20, V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, AR2200-S V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, AR3200 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R006C11, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C00, V200R008C10, V200R008C20, V200R008C30, AR3600 V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R008C20, AR510 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, CloudEngine 12800 V100R003C00, V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, CloudEngine 5800 V100R003C00, V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, CloudEngine 6800 V100R003C00, V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, CloudEngine 7800 V100R003C00, V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, DP300 V500R002C00, SMC2.0 V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V500R002C00, SRG1300 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, SRG2300 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, SRG3300 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, TE30 V100R001C10, TE60 V100R003C00, V500R002C00, VP9660 V200R001C02, V200R001C30, V500R002C00, ViewPoint 8660 V100R008C02, V100R008C03, eSpace IAD V300R002C01, eSpace U1981 V200R003C20, V200R003C30, eSpace USM V100R001C01, V300R001C00 have a weak cryptography vulnerability. Due to not properly some values in the certificates, an unauthenticated remote attacker could forges a specific RSA certificate and exploits the vulnerability to pass identity authentication and logs into the target device to obtain permissions configured for the specific user name.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-ar2200_firmwarear1200te30_firmwarear3200_firmwarevp9660ar2200cloudengine_5800srg1300te60espace_usm_firmwaresrg1300_firmwareviewpoint_8660_firmwaresrg3300_firmwaresrg2300_firmwaresrg3300smc2.0_firmwarete30ar120-s_firmwarear1200-s_firmwarecloudengine_12800_firmwarecloudengine_7800espace_u1981_firmwaredp300ar200-sar120-scloudengine_6800ar510cloudengine_12800espace_u1981ar160te60_firmwaresrg2300ar150_firmwarear2200-sar510_firmwarear1200-sar3600ar150ar3200cloudengine_6800_firmwarecloudengine_7800_firmwaresmc2.0dp300_firmwareespace_usmar1200_firmwarear200-s_firmwarear200espace_iadar3600_firmwarear160_firmwarear2200-s_firmwarecloudengine_5800_firmwarevp9660_firmwareespace_iad_firmwareviewpoint_8660ar200_firmwareAR120-S,AR1200,AR1200-S,AR150,AR160,AR200,AR200-S,AR2200,AR2200-S,AR3200,AR3600,AR510,CloudEngine 12800,CloudEngine 5800,CloudEngine 6800,CloudEngine 7800,DP300,SMC2.0,SRG1300,SRG2300,SRG3300,TE30,TE60,VP9660,ViewPoint 8660,eSpace IAD,eSpace U1981,eSpace USM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-42508
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.37% / 28.47%
||
7 Day CHG+0.06%
Published-22 May, 2026 | 02:31
Updated-28 May, 2026 | 14:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Invoking auth bypass via unenforced @revoked status in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh/knownhosts

Previously, a revoked 'SignatureKey' belonging to a CA was not correctly checked for revocation. Now, both the 'key' and 'key.SignatureKey' are checked for @revoked.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-golang.org/x/cryptoGo
Product-cryptogolang.org/x/crypto/ssh/knownhosts
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-41132
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.6||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 9.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 May, 2026 | 18:53
Updated-15 May, 2026 | 14:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
CKAN: No certificate validation on STMP connection

CKAN is an open-source DMS (data management system) for powering data hubs and data portals. Prior to 2.10.10 and 2.11.5, the configured SMTP server may be spoofed with any certificate (e.g. self-signed), leaving credentials and all emails sent open to MITM attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.10.10 and 2.11.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-okfnckan
Product-ckanckan
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44531
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-8.37% / 94.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 18:27
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle Corporation
Product-peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsgraalvmmysql_enterprise_monitormysql_clustermysql_connectorsmysql_workbenchnode.jsmysql_serverNode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-43882
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-9||CRITICAL
EPSS-2.42% / 82.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Dec, 2021 | 14:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-defender_for_iotMicrosoft Defender for IoT
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-40971
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
CVSS Score-5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 5.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Apr, 2026 | 22:45
Updated-14 May, 2026 | 16:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When configured to use an SSL bundle, Spring Boot's RabbitMQ auto-configuration does not perform hostname verification when connecting to the RabbitMQ broker. Affected: Spring Boot 4.0.0–4.0.5 (fix 4.0.6), 3.5.0–3.5.13 (fix 3.5.14) per vendor advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-VMware (Broadcom Inc.)
Product-spring_bootSpring Boot
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-35560
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Amazon
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Amazon
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.26% / 17.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2026 | 20:10
Updated-14 Apr, 2026 | 16:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper certificate validation in identity provider connection components in Amazon Athena ODBC driver

Improper certificate validation in the identity provider connection components in Amazon Athena ODBC driver before 2.1.0.0 might allow a man-in-the-middle threat actor to intercept authentication credentials due to insufficient default transport security when connecting to identity providers. This only applies to connections with external identity providers and does not apply to connections with Athena. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 2.1.0.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-amazonAmazonApple Inc.Microsoft CorporationLinux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelathena_odbcwindowsmacosAmazon Athena ODBC driver
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-33896
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 8.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 20:50
Updated-14 Apr, 2026 | 01:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Forge has a basicConstraints bypass in its certificate chain verification (RFC 5280 violation)

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.4.0, `pki.verifyCertificateChain()` does not enforce RFC 5280 basicConstraints requirements when an intermediate certificate lacks both the `basicConstraints` and `keyUsage` extensions. This allows any leaf certificate (without these extensions) to act as a CA and sign other certificates, which node-forge will accept as valid. Version 1.4.0 patches the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-42027
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.48% / 37.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2021 | 12:06
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SINUMERIK Edge (All versions < V3.2). The affected software does not properly validate the server certificate when initiating a TLS connection. This could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the client and the intended server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sinumerik_edgeSINUMERIK Edge
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3618
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-2.04% / 78.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Mar, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ALPACA is an application layer protocol content confusion attack, exploiting TLS servers implementing different protocols but using compatible certificates, such as multi-domain or wildcard certificates. A MiTM attacker having access to victim's traffic at the TCP/IP layer can redirect traffic from one subdomain to another, resulting in a valid TLS session. This breaks the authentication of TLS and cross-protocol attacks may be possible where the behavior of one protocol service may compromise the other at the application layer.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vsftpd_projectsendmailn/aDebian GNU/LinuxFedora ProjectF5, Inc.
Product-debian_linuxfedoranginxvsftpdsendmailALPACA
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3460
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Lenovo Group Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Lenovo Group Ltd.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.56% / 42.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Apr, 2021 | 20:41
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 16:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Motorola MH702x devices, prior to version 2.0.0.301, do not properly verify the server certificate during communication with the support server which could lead to the communication channel being accessible by an attacker.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Motorola Mobility LLC. (Lenovo Group Limited)
Product-mh702xmh702x_firmwareMH702x
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3547
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.97% / 57.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2021 | 10:35
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenVPN 3 Core Library version 3.6 and 3.6.1 allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to bypass the certificate authentication by issuing an unrelated server certificate using the same hostname found in the verify-x509-name option in a client configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openvpnn/a
Product-openvpnOpenVPN 3 Core Library
CWE ID-CWE-305
Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-34599
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.46% / 36.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Dec, 2021 | 09:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in CODESYS Git

Affected versions of CODESYS Git in Versions prior to V1.1.0.0 lack certificate validation in HTTPS handshakes. CODESYS Git does not implement certificate validation by default, so it does not verify that the server provides a valid and trusted HTTPS certificate. Since the certificate of the server to which the connection is made is not properly verified, the server connection is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-CODESYS GmbH
Product-development_systemgitCODESYS Git
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found