Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2021-29504

Summary
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At-07 Jun, 2021 | 20:50
Updated At-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected At-
Credits

Improper Certificate Validation in WP-CLI framework

WP-CLI is the command-line interface for WordPress. An improper error handling in HTTPS requests management in WP-CLI version 0.12.0 and later allows remote attackers able to intercept the communication to remotely disable the certificate verification on WP-CLI side, gaining full control over the communication content, including the ability to impersonate update servers and push malicious updates towards WordPress instances controlled by the vulnerable WP-CLI agent, or push malicious updates toward WP-CLI itself. The vulnerability stems from the fact that the default behavior of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` when encountering a TLS handshake error is to disable certificate validation and retry the same request. The default behavior has been changed with version 2.5.0 of WP-CLI and the `wp-cli/wp-cli` framework (via https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523) so that the `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` method accepts an `$insecure` option that is `false` by default and consequently that a TLS handshake failure is a hard error by default. This new default is a breaking change and ripples through to all consumers of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()`, including those in separate WP-CLI bundled or third-party packages. https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523 has also added an `--insecure` flag to the `cli update` command to counter this breaking change. There is no direct workaround for the default insecure behavior of `wp-cli/wp-cli` versions before 2.5.0. The workaround for dealing with the breaking change in the commands directly affected by the new secure default behavior is to add the `--insecure` flag to manually opt-in to the previous insecure behavior.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID:a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At:07 Jun, 2021 | 20:50
Updated At:03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Improper Certificate Validation in WP-CLI framework

WP-CLI is the command-line interface for WordPress. An improper error handling in HTTPS requests management in WP-CLI version 0.12.0 and later allows remote attackers able to intercept the communication to remotely disable the certificate verification on WP-CLI side, gaining full control over the communication content, including the ability to impersonate update servers and push malicious updates towards WordPress instances controlled by the vulnerable WP-CLI agent, or push malicious updates toward WP-CLI itself. The vulnerability stems from the fact that the default behavior of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` when encountering a TLS handshake error is to disable certificate validation and retry the same request. The default behavior has been changed with version 2.5.0 of WP-CLI and the `wp-cli/wp-cli` framework (via https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523) so that the `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` method accepts an `$insecure` option that is `false` by default and consequently that a TLS handshake failure is a hard error by default. This new default is a breaking change and ripples through to all consumers of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()`, including those in separate WP-CLI bundled or third-party packages. https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523 has also added an `--insecure` flag to the `cli update` command to counter this breaking change. There is no direct workaround for the default insecure behavior of `wp-cli/wp-cli` versions before 2.5.0. The workaround for dealing with the breaking change in the commands directly affected by the new secure default behavior is to add the `--insecure` flag to manually opt-in to the previous insecure behavior.

Affected Products
Vendor
wp-cli
Product
wp-cli
Versions
Affected
  • < 2.5.0
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-295CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-295
Description: CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.19.1CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.1
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-rwgm-f83r-v3qj
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/wp-cli/checksum-command/pull/86
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/wp-cli/config-command/pull/128
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/wp-cli/core-command/pull/186
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/wp-cli/extension-command/pull/287
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/wp-cli/package-command/pull/138
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-rwgm-f83r-v3qj
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/checksum-command/pull/86
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/config-command/pull/128
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/core-command/pull/186
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/extension-command/pull/287
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/package-command/pull/138
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-rwgm-f83r-v3qj
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://github.com/wp-cli/checksum-command/pull/86
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/wp-cli/config-command/pull/128
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/wp-cli/core-command/pull/186
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/wp-cli/extension-command/pull/287
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/wp-cli/package-command/pull/138
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-rwgm-f83r-v3qj
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/checksum-command/pull/86
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/config-command/pull/128
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/core-command/pull/186
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/extension-command/pull/287
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/package-command/pull/138
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security-advisories@github.com
Published At:07 Jun, 2021 | 21:15
Updated At:17 Jun, 2021 | 15:33

WP-CLI is the command-line interface for WordPress. An improper error handling in HTTPS requests management in WP-CLI version 0.12.0 and later allows remote attackers able to intercept the communication to remotely disable the certificate verification on WP-CLI side, gaining full control over the communication content, including the ability to impersonate update servers and push malicious updates towards WordPress instances controlled by the vulnerable WP-CLI agent, or push malicious updates toward WP-CLI itself. The vulnerability stems from the fact that the default behavior of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` when encountering a TLS handshake error is to disable certificate validation and retry the same request. The default behavior has been changed with version 2.5.0 of WP-CLI and the `wp-cli/wp-cli` framework (via https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523) so that the `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()` method accepts an `$insecure` option that is `false` by default and consequently that a TLS handshake failure is a hard error by default. This new default is a breaking change and ripples through to all consumers of `WP_CLI\Utils\http_request()`, including those in separate WP-CLI bundled or third-party packages. https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523 has also added an `--insecure` flag to the `cli update` command to counter this breaking change. There is no direct workaround for the default insecure behavior of `wp-cli/wp-cli` versions before 2.5.0. The workaround for dealing with the breaking change in the commands directly affected by the new secure default behavior is to add the `--insecure` flag to manually opt-in to the previous insecure behavior.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Secondary3.19.1CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary2.07.5HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.1
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CPE Matches

wp-cli
wp-cli
>>wp-cli>>Versions from 0.12.0(inclusive) to 2.5.0(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:wp-cli:wp-cli:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/wp-cli/checksum-command/pull/86security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/wp-cli/config-command/pull/128security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/wp-cli/core-command/pull/186security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/wp-cli/extension-command/pull/287security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/wp-cli/package-command/pull/138security-advisories@github.com
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-rwgm-f83r-v3qjsecurity-advisories@github.com
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/checksum-command/pull/86
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/config-command/pull/128
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/core-command/pull/186
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/extension-command/pull/287
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/package-command/pull/138
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/pull/5523
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/wp-cli/wp-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-rwgm-f83r-v3qj
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

156Records found

CVE-2025-12765
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PostgreSQL
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PostgreSQL
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 13.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2025 | 13:00
Updated-19 Nov, 2025 | 21:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
pgAdmin 4: LDAP authentication flow vulnerable to TLS certificate verification bypass.

pgAdmin <= 9.9  is affected by a vulnerability in the LDAP authentication mechanism allows bypassing TLS certificate verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pgadminpgadmin.org
Product-pgadmin_4pgAdmin 4
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-3886
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.58% / 68.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jul, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libinfinity before 0.6.6-1 does not validate expired SSL certificates, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libinfinity_projectn/a
Product-libinfinityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32151
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:46
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise disabled TLS validation using the CA certificate stores in Python 3 libraries by default

The httplib and urllib Python libraries that Splunk shipped with Splunk Enterprise did not validate certificates using the certificate authority (CA) certificate stores by default in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203. Python 3 client libraries now verify server certificates by default and use the appropriate CA certificate stores for each library. Apps and add-ons that include their own HTTP libraries are not affected. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk EnterpriseSplunk Cloud Platform
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-2320
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-4.83% / 89.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jan, 2018 | 19:00
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 05:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The TLS stack in Mono before 3.12.1 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors related to client-side SSLv2 fallback.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mono-projectn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxmonon/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-54848
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.27% / 50.25%
||
7 Day CHG+0.21%
Published-10 Jan, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-02 Oct, 2025 | 16:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper handling and storage of certificates in CP Plus CP-VNR-3104 B3223P22C02424 allow attackers to decrypt communications or execute a man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCP PLUS (Aditya Group - Aditya Infotech Limited)
Product-cp-vnr-3104cp-vnr-3104_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-8164
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.14% / 34.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2022 | 19:06
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 13:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A insecure configuration for certificate verification (http.verify_mode = OpenSSL::SSL::VERIFY_NONE) may lead to verification bypass in Red Hat CloudForms 5.x.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-cloudforms_management_engineRed Hat CloudForms
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-9432
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.15% / 35.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Feb, 2020 | 22:40
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

openssl_x509_check_host in lua-openssl 0.7.7-1 mishandles X.509 certificate validation because it uses lua_pushboolean for certain non-boolean return values.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lua-openssl_projectn/a
Product-lua-openssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-11043
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.02% / 3.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2026 | 15:52
Updated-26 Jan, 2026 | 15:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Server Certificate Validation in Automation Studio

An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the OPC-UA client and ANSL over TLS client used in Automation Studio versions before 6.5 could allow an unauthenticated attacker on the network to position themselves to intercept and interfere with data exchanges.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-B&R Industrial Automation GmbH
Product-B&R Automation Studio
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-52330
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) U.S. Civilian Government
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) U.S. Civilian Government
CVSS Score-9.5||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.11% / 29.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2025 | 16:36
Updated-23 Sep, 2025 | 17:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ECOVACS lawnmowers and vacuums do not properly validate TLS certificates

ECOVACS lawnmowers and vacuums do not properly validate TLS certificates. An unauthenticated attacker can read or modify TLS traffic, possibly modifying firmware updates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ecovacsECOVACS
Product-deebot_x1s_pro_plusdeebot_x5_pro_ultradeebot_x1_turbodeebot_x1_omnideebot_x5_pro_plus_firmwaredeebot_x1s_pro_firmwaredeebot_t10_firmwaredeebot_x2_omnideebot_x1_plus_firmwaredeebot_t10_omnideebot_t10_turbo_firmwaredeebot_x1_firmwaredeebot_x2sdeebot_x2_combodeebot_t10_plus_firmwaredeebot_x2_omni_firmwaredeebot_x1deebot_t10_plusdeebot_x1_pro_omnideebot_x2_combo_firmwaredeebot_t10_turbodeebot_x1_pro_omni_firmwaremate_xdeebot_x5_pro_ultra_firmwaredeebot_x5_pro_firmwaredeebot_x5_prodeebot_x2_pro_firmwaremate_x_firmwaredeebot_x2_prodeebot_x5_pro_plusdeebot_x2s_firmwaredeebot_x1s_pro_plus_firmwaredeebot_t10_omni_firmwaredeebot_x1e_omnideebot_x1_omni_firmwaredeebot_x1_turbo_firmwaredeebot_x1e_omni_firmwaredeebot_x1_plusdeebot_x1s_prodeebot_t10DEEBOT X1 TURBODEEBOT T10 OMNIDEEBOT T10 TURBODEEBOT T10 PLUSDEEBOT X2 PRODEEBOT X5 PRODEEBOT X1 PRO OMNIDEEBOT X1 PLUSDEEBOT X2 OMNIMate XDEEBOT X2SDEEBOT X5 PRO ULTRADEEBOT X5 PRO PLUSDEEBOT X1S PRODEEBOT X1S PRO PLUSDEEBOT T10DEEBOT X1 OMNIDEEBOT X1DEEBOT X2 COMBODEEBOT X1e OMNI
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 07:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder CLI connections lacked TLS cert validation

In Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder versions before 9.0, the Splunk command-line interface (CLI) did not validate TLS certificates while connecting to a remote Splunk platform instance by default. After updating to version 9.0, see Configure TLS host name validation for the Splunk CLI https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation#Configure_TLS_host_name_validation_for_the_Splunk_CLI to enable the remediation. The vulnerability does not affect the Splunk Cloud Platform. At the time of publishing, we have no evidence of exploitation of this vulnerability by external parties. The issue requires conditions beyond the control of a potential bad actor such as a machine-in-the-middle attack. Hence, Splunk rates the complexity of the attack as High.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-universal_forwardersplunkSplunk EnterpriseUniversal Forwarder
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-50691
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 14.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Feb, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-07 Apr, 2025 | 18:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

SunGrow iSolarCloud Android app V2.1.6.20241104 and prior suffers from Missing SSL Certificate Validation. The app explicitly ignores certificate errors and is vulnerable to MiTM attacks. Attackers can impersonate the iSolarCloud server and communicate with the Android app.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sungrowpowern/a
Product-isolarcloudn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-31733
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.14% / 34.15%
||
7 Day CHG-0.10%
Published-03 Feb, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-25 Mar, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Starting with diego-release 2.55.0 and up to 2.69.0, and starting with CF Deployment 17.1 and up to 23.2.0, apps are accessible via another port on diego cells, allowing application ingress without a client certificate. If mTLS route integrity is enabled AND unproxied ports are turned off, then an attacker could connect to an application that should be only reachable via mTLS, without presenting a client certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCloud Foundry
Product-diegocf-deploymentCloud Foundry Diego and CF Deployment
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-31183
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.21% / 43.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2022 | 19:50
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 17:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
mTLS client verification is skipped in fs2 on Node.js

fs2 is a compositional, streaming I/O library for Scala. When establishing a server-mode `TLSSocket` using `fs2-io` on Node.js, the parameter `requestCert = true` is ignored, peer certificate verification is skipped, and the connection proceeds. The vulnerability is limited to: 1. `fs2-io` running on Node.js. The JVM TLS implementation is completely independent. 2. `TLSSocket`s in server-mode. Client-mode `TLSSocket`s are implemented via a different API. 3. mTLS as enabled via `requestCert = true` in `TLSParameters`. The default setting is `false` for server-mode `TLSSocket`s. It was introduced with the initial Node.js implementation of fs2-io in 3.1.0. A patch is released in v3.2.11. The requestCert = true parameter is respected and the peer certificate is verified. If verification fails, a SSLException is raised. If using an unpatched version on Node.js, do not use a server-mode TLSSocket with requestCert = true to establish a mTLS connection.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-typeleveltypelevel
Product-fs2fs2
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-2996
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Sep, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 00:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in the python-scciclient when making an HTTPS connection to a server where the server's certificate would not be verified. This issue opens up the connection to possible Man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-python-scciclient_projectn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-python-scciclientdebian_linuxpython-scciclient
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-11580
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.25% / 47.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2020 | 20:03
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, accepts an arbitrary SSL certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.Oracle CorporationPulse SecureLinux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-solarislinux_kernelpulse_connect_securepulse_policy_securemacosn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-3994
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Oct, 2020 | 16:14
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 07:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

VMware vCenter Server (6.7 before 6.7u3, 6.6 before 6.5u3k) contains a session hijack vulnerability in the vCenter Server Appliance Management Interface update function due to a lack of certificate validation. A malicious actor with network positioning between vCenter Server and an update repository may be able to perform a session hijack when the vCenter Server Appliance Management Interface is used to download vCenter updates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aVMware (Broadcom Inc.)
Product-vcenter_servercloud_foundationvCenter Server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-7615
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Elastic
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Elastic
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 33.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jul, 2019 | 21:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A TLS certificate validation flaw was found in Elastic APM agent for Ruby versions before 2.9.0. When specifying a trusted server CA certificate via the 'server_ca_cert' setting, the Ruby agent would not properly verify the certificate returned by the APM server. This could result in a man in the middle style attack against the Ruby agent.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Elasticsearch BV
Product-apm-agent-rubyElastic APM agent for Ruby
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-6032
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 33.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Dec, 2019 | 15:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The NTV News24 prior to Ver.3.0.0 does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ntvNippon Television Network Corporation
Product-news_24NTV News24
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-55581
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 31.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Feb, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-07 Apr, 2025 | 18:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When AdaCore Ada Web Server 25.0.0 is linked with GnuTLS, the default behaviour of AWS.Client is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack because of lack of verification of an HTTPS server's certificate (unless the using program specifies a TLS configuration).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-adacoren/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-ada_web_serverdebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-4991
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-2.16% / 83.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 May, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 05:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application versions 4.4.1.298 and earlier have an exploitable Improper certificate validation vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to a security bypass.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aAdobe Inc.
Product-creative_cloudCreative Cloud Desktop Application 4.4.1.298 and earlier versions
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-18632
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.20% / 41.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Oct, 2019 | 21:16
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

European Commission eIDAS-Node Integration Package before 2.3.1 allows Certificate Faking because an attacker can sign a manipulated SAML response with a forged certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-europan/a
Product-eidas-node_integration_packagen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-1266
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-33.99% / 96.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2014 | 15:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The SSLVerifySignedServerKeyExchange function in libsecurity_ssl/lib/sslKeyExchange.c in the Secure Transport feature in the Data Security component in Apple iOS 6.x before 6.1.6 and 7.x before 7.0.6, Apple TV 6.x before 6.0.2, and Apple OS X 10.9.x before 10.9.2 does not check the signature in a TLS Server Key Exchange message, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by (1) using an arbitrary private key for the signing step or (2) omitting the signing step.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_osmac_os_xtvosn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-18633
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.20% / 41.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Oct, 2019 | 21:16
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

European Commission eIDAS-Node Integration Package before 2.3.1 has Missing Certificate Validation because a certain ExplicitKeyTrustEvaluator return value is not checked. NOTE: only 2.1 is confirmed to be affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-europan/a
Product-eidas-node_integration_packagen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5822
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The contribution feature in Zamboni does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate, related to use of the Python urllib2 library.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMozilla Corporation
Product-zambonin/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-17560
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.55% / 81.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Mar, 2020 | 18:39
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The "Apache NetBeans" autoupdate system does not validate SSL certificates and hostnames for https based downloads. This allows an attacker to intercept downloads of autoupdates and modify the download, potentially injecting malicious code. “Apache NetBeans" versions up to and including 11.2 are affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-netbeansgraalvmApache NetBeans
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1683
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 37.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Feb, 2019 | 17:00
Updated-21 Nov, 2024 | 19:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco SPA112, SPA525, and SPA5x5 Series IP Phones Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the certificate handling component of the Cisco SPA112, SPA525, and SPA5X5 Series IP Phones could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to listen to or control some aspects of a Transport Level Security (TLS)-encrypted Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) conversation. The vulnerability is due to the improper validation of server certificates. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious server certificate to present to the client. An exploit could allow an attacker to eavesdrop on TLS-encrypted traffic and potentially route or redirect calls initiated by an affected device. Affected software include version 7.6.2 of the Cisco Small Business SPA525 Series IP Phones and Cisco Small Business SPA5X5 Series IP Phones and version 1.4.2 of the Cisco Small Business SPA500 Series IP Phones and Cisco Small Business SPA112 Series IP Phones.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-spa501g_firmwarespa525g_firmwarespa512gspa500spa525gspa512g_firmwarespa525spa508gspa500s_firmwarespa525_firmwarespa502g_firmwarespa501gspa502gspa5x5spa500sspa509gspa500dsspa504g_firmwarespa112_firmwarespa5x5_firmwarespa509g_firmwarespa508g_firmwarespa112spa514g_firmwarespa514gspa500_firmwarespa500ds_firmwarespa504gCisco Small Business SPA112 Series IP PhonesCisco Small Business SPA5X5 Series IP PhonesCisco Small Business SPA500 Series IP PhonesCisco Small Business SPA525 Series IP Phones
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1748
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.27% / 50.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2019 | 23:50
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software Network Plug-and-Play Agent Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Cisco Network Plug-and-Play (PnP) agent of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data. The vulnerability exists because the affected software insufficiently validates certificates. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted certificate to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks to decrypt and modify confidential information on user connections to the affected software.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ios_xeiosCisco IOS and IOS XE Software
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5817
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Codehaus XFire 1.2.6 and earlier, as used in the Amazon EC2 API Tools Java library and other products, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-codehausamazonn/a
Product-ec2_api_tools_java_libraryxfiren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-27890
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palantir Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palantir Technologies
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 34.85%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-16 Feb, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-18 Mar, 2025 | 15:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was discovered that the sls-logging was not verifying hostnames in TLS certificates due to a misuse of the javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory API. A malicious attacker in a privileged network position could abuse this to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful man-in-the-middle attack would allow them to intercept, read, or modify network communications to and from the affected service. In the case of AtlasDB, the vulnerability was mitigated by other network controls such as two-way TLS when deployed as part of a Palantir platform. Palantir still recommends upgrading to a non-vulnerable version out of an abundance of caution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-palantirPalantir
Product-atlasdbAtlasDB
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6680
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 7.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Dec, 2023 | 16:02
Updated-29 Aug, 2024 | 15:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in GitLab

An improper certificate validation issue in Smartcard authentication in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 11.6 prior to 16.4.4, 16.5 prior to 16.5.4, and 16.6 prior to 16.6.2 allows an attacker to authenticate as another user given their public key if they use Smartcard authentication. Smartcard authentication is an experimental feature and has to be manually enabled by an administrator.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabGitLab
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16263
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Oct, 2019 | 11:19
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Twitter Kit framework through 3.4.2 for iOS does not properly validate the api.twitter.com SSL certificate. Although the certificate chain must contain one of a set of pinned certificates, there are certain implementation errors such as a lack of hostname verification. NOTE: this is an end-of-life product.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-twittern/a
Product-twitter_kitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-43550
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.35% / 79.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Oct, 2024 | 17:35
Updated-08 Jul, 2025 | 15:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_21h2windows_10_1809windows_server_2016windows_server_2022_23h2windows_server_2012windows_10_1507windows_11_21h2windows_11_24h2windows_10_22h2windows_server_2022windows_11_22h2windows_server_2019windows_10_1607windows_11_23h2Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 10 Version 1607Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2012Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows 11 version 22H3Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2012 R2Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2016Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows 11 version 21H2Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-0955
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Canonical Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Canonical Ltd.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Dec, 2020 | 00:50
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
software-properties incorrectly validated TLS certificates

software-properties was vulnerable to a person-in-the-middle attack due to incorrect TLS certificate validation in softwareproperties/ppa.py. software-properties didn't check TLS certificates under python2 and only checked certificates under python3 if a valid certificate bundle was provided. Fixed in software-properties version 0.92.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Canonical Ltd.
Product-software-propertiessoftware-properties
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-52329
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) U.S. Civilian Government
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) U.S. Civilian Government
CVSS Score-9.5||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.12% / 31.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2025 | 16:36
Updated-23 Sep, 2025 | 17:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ECOVACS HOME mobile app plugins do not properly validate TLS certificates

ECOVACS HOME mobile app plugins for specific robots do not properly validate TLS certificates. An unauthenticated attacker can read or modify TLS traffic and obtain authentication tokens.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ecovacsECOVACS
Product-homeECOVACS HOME
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16209
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Brocade Communications Systems, LLC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Brocade Communications Systems, LLC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Nov, 2019 | 17:19
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability, in The ReportsTrustManager class of Brocade SANnav versions before v2.0, could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against Secure Sockets Layer(SSL)connections.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (Broadcom Inc.)Broadcom Inc.
Product-brocade_sannavBrocade SANnav
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-14910
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.42% / 61.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Dec, 2019 | 14:16
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability was found in keycloak 7.x, when keycloak is configured with LDAP user federation and StartTLS is used instead of SSL/TLS from the LDAP server (ldaps), in this case user authentication succeeds even if invalid password has entered.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-keycloakKeycloak
CWE ID-CWE-305
Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-592
DEPRECATED: Authentication Bypass Issues
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6056
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 31.10%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 07:31
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 16:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure Trust of Self-Signed Certificates in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11164)

A vulnerability has been discovered in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality that results in the improper trust of self-signed certificates. The product is found to trust certificates signed with the RIPEMD-160 hashing algorithm without proper validation, allowing an attacker to establish MITM SSL connections to arbitrary sites.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-10914
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.39% / 59.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Apr, 2019 | 13:31
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

pubRsaDecryptSignedElementExt in MatrixSSL 4.0.1 Open, as used in Inside Secure TLS Toolkit, has a stack-based buffer overflow during X.509 certificate verification because of missing validation in psRsaDecryptPubExt in crypto/pubkey/rsa_pub.c.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-matrixssln/a
Product-matrixssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-787
Out-of-bounds Write
CVE-2024-38861
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Checkmk GmbH
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Checkmk GmbH
CVSS Score-4.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 53.10%
||
7 Day CHG+0.08%
Published-27 Sep, 2024 | 08:11
Updated-20 Dec, 2024 | 18:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Lack of TLS validation in plugin MikroTik on Checkmk Exchange

Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin MikroTik allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic. This issue affects MikroTik: from 2.0.0 through 2.5.5, from 0.4a_mk through 2.0a.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tomtretbar
Product-mikrotik
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11688
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 59.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2020 | 14:58
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in ASUSTOR exFAT Driver through 1.0.0.r20. When conducting license validation, exfat.cgi and exfatctl accept any certificate for asustornasapi.asustor.com. In other words, there is Missing SSL Certificate Validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aASUSTOR Inc.
Product-exfat_drivern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6055
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 38.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 07:17
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 16:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11158)

A vulnerability has been identified in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality where the software fails to properly validate website certificates. Specifically, if a site certificate lacks the "Server Authentication" specification in the Extended Key Usage extension, the product does not verify the certificate's compliance with the site, deeming such certificates as valid. This flaw could allow an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack, intercepting and potentially altering communications between the user and the website.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-25160
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.01% / 0.67%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-04 Feb, 2026 | 19:40
Updated-05 Feb, 2026 | 14:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Alist has Insecure TLS Config

Alist is a file list program that supports multiple storages, powered by Gin and Solidjs. Prior to version 3.57.0, the application disables TLS certificate verification by default for all outgoing storage driver communications, making the system vulnerable to Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks. This enables the complete decryption, theft, and manipulation of all data transmitted during storage operations, severely compromising the confidentiality and integrity of user data. This issue has been patched in version 3.57.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-AlistGo
Product-alist
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6057
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 39.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2024 | 07:38
Updated-21 Nov, 2024 | 16:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Insecure Trust of DSA-Signed Certificates in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS Scanning (VA-11166)

A vulnerability has been discovered in Bitdefender Total Security HTTPS scanning functionality that results in the improper trust of certificates issued using the DSA signature algorithm. The product does not properly check the certificate chain, allowing an attacker to establish MITM SSL connections to arbitrary sites using a DSA-signed certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-total_securityTotal Securitytotal_security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-10091
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 26.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2020 | 13:05
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When TLS is enabled with ssl-endpoint-identification-enabled set to true, Apache Geode fails to perform hostname verification of the entries in the certificate SAN during the SSL handshake. This could compromise intra-cluster communication using a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-geodeApache Geode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1010275
Matching Score-4
Assigner-7556d962-6fb7-411e-85fa-6cd62f095ba8
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-7556d962-6fb7-411e-85fa-6cd62f095ba8
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.30% / 53.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jul, 2019 | 20:14
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

helm Before 2.7.2 is affected by: CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation. The impact is: Unauthorized clients could connect to the server because self-signed client certs were aloowed. The component is: helm (many files updated, see https://github.com/helm/helm/pull/3152/files/1096813bf9a425e2aa4ac755b6c991b626dfab50). The attack vector is: A malicious client could connect to the server over the network. The fixed version is: 2.7.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-helmhelm
Product-helmhelm
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-0054
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 23.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Oct, 2019 | 19:26
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: SRX Series: An attacker may be able to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks during app-id signature updates.

An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the SRX Series Application Identification (app-id) signature update client of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D120 on SRX Series devices. No other versions of Junos OS are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-srx345srx5800srx110srx4200srx340srx550_hmsrx4100srx220srx240srx3600vsrxsrx5400srx1400srx100srx3400srx300srx550srx320srx5600junossrx650srx210srx4600csrxsrx1500Junos OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-300
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint
CVE-2025-56231
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.03% / 9.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Nov, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-07 Jan, 2026 | 20:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Tonec Internet Download Manager 6.42.41.1 and earlier suffers from Missing SSL Certificate Validation, which allows attackers to bypass update protections.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tonecn/a
Product-internet_download_managern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-9127
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.18% / 39.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Apr, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 07:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Botan 2.2.0 - 2.4.0 (fixed in 2.5.0) improperly handled wildcard certificates and could accept certain certificates as valid for hostnames when, under RFC 6125 rules, they should not match. This only affects certificates issued to the same domain as the host, so to impersonate a host one must already have a wildcard certificate matching other hosts in the same domain. For example, b*.example.com would match some hostnames that do not begin with a 'b' character.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-botan_projectn/a
Product-botann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5819
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

FilesAnywhere does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-filesanywheren/a
Product-filesanywheren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-8531
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.32% / 54.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Oct, 2020 | 20:57
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A validation issue existed in Trust Anchor Management. This issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in watchOS 5.2, macOS Mojave 10.14.4, Security Update 2019-002 High Sierra, Security Update 2019-002 Sierra, iOS 12.2. An untrusted radius server certificate may be trusted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-mac_os_xiphone_oswatchosmacOSiOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found