In JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.2, blind SSRF via an XML-RPC call was possible.

Nepxion Discovery is a solution for Spring Cloud. Discovery is vulnerable to a potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). RouterResourceImpl uses RestTemplate’s getForEntity to retrieve the contents of a URL containing user-controlled input, potentially resulting in Information Disclosure. There is no patch available for this issue at time of publication. There are no known workarounds.

Sentinel 1.8.2 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

With this SSRF vulnerability, an attacker can reach internal addresses to make a request as the server and read it's contents. This attack can lead to leak of sensitive information.

The vCenter Server contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A malicious actor with network access to 443 on the vCenter Server may exploit this issue by accessing a URL request outside of vCenter Server or accessing an internal service.

SAP Commerce Cloud (Accelerator Payment Mock), versions - 1808, 1811, 1905, 2005, allows an unauthenticated attacker to submit a crafted request over a network to a particular SAP Commerce module URL which will be processed without further interaction, the crafted request leads to Server Side Request Forgery attack which could lead to retrieval of limited pieces of information about the service with no impact on integrity or availability.

MISP through 2.4.133 allows SSRF in the REST client via the use_full_path parameter with an arbitrary URL.

umputun remark42 version 1.12.1 and before has a Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.

SAP Fiori Launchpad (News tile Application), versions - 750,751,752,753,754,755, allows an unauthorized attacker to send a crafted request to a vulnerable web application. It is usually used to target internal systems behind firewalls that are normally inaccessible to an attacker from the external network to retrieve sensitive / confidential resources which are otherwise restricted for internal usage only, resulting in a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability.

An unauthenticated attacked could send a specifically crafted web request causing a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Ivanti Avalanche Remote Control server.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in StylemixThemes Motors – Car Dealer, Classifieds & Listing.This issue affects Motors – Car Dealer, Classifieds & Listing: from n/a through 1.4.6.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache ServiceComb Service-Center. Attackers can obtain sensitive server information through specially crafted requests.This issue affects Apache ServiceComb before 2.1.0(include). Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.2.0, which fixes the issue.

Zoho ManageEngine SupportCenter Plus before 11016 is vulnerable to an SSRF attack in ActionExecutor.

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in rConfig 3.9.5 has been fixed for 3.9.6. This vulnerability allowed remote authenticated attackers to open a connection to the machine via the deviceIpAddr and connPort parameters.

An SSRF issue was discovered in Zammad before 3.4.1. The SMS configuration interface for Massenversand is implemented in a way that renders the result of a test request to the User. An attacker can use this to request any URL via a GET request from the network interface of the server. This may lead to disclosure of information from intranet systems.

BigBlueButton before 2.2.7 allows remote authenticated users to read local files and conduct SSRF attacks via an uploaded Office document that has a crafted URL in an ODF xlink field.

XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.15, a Server-Side Forgery Request vulnerability can be activated when unmarshalling. The vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.15. The reported vulnerability does not exist if running Java 15 or higher. No user is affected who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's Security Framework with a whitelist! Anyone relying on XStream's default blacklist can immediately switch to a whilelist for the allowed types to avoid the vulnerability. Users of XStream 1.4.14 or below who still want to use XStream default blacklist can use a workaround described in more detailed in the referenced advisories.

The Table Filter and Charts for Confluence Server app before 5.3.26 (for Atlassian Confluence) allows SSRF via the "Table from CSV" macro (URL parameter).

AEM Forms SP6 add-on for AEM 6.5.6.0 and Forms add-on package for AEM 6.4 Service Pack 8 Cumulative Fix Pack 2 (6.4.8.2) have a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. This vulnerability could be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker to gather information about internal systems that reside on the same network.

SSRF vulnerability in Halo <=1.3.2 exists in the SMTP configuration, which can detect the server intranet.

FOG is a free open-source cloning/imaging/rescue suite/inventory management system. Prior to version 1.5.10, a server-side-request-forgery (SSRF) vulnerability allowed an unauthenticated user to trigger a GET request as the server to an arbitrary endpoint and URL scheme. This also allows remote access to files visible to the Apache user group. Other impacts vary based on server configuration. Version 1.5.10 contains a patch.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco BroadWorks CommPilot application could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain confidential information from the BroadWorks server and other device on the network. {{value}} ["%7b%7bvalue%7d%7d"])}]]

In Aruba AirWave Glass before 1.3.3, there is a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability through an unauthenticated endpoint that if successfully exploited can result in disclosure of sensitive information. This can be used to perform an authentication bypass and ultimately gain administrative access on the web administrative interface.

Gophish before 0.11.0 allows SSRF attacks.

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) affecting the PDF generation in MicroStrategy 10.4, 2019 before Update 6, and 2020 before Update 2 allows authenticated users to access the content of internal network resources or leak files from the local system via HTML containers embedded in a dossier/dashboard document. NOTE: 10.4., no fix will be released as version will reach end-of-life on 31/12/2020.

A server side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in /ApiAdminDomainSettings.php of MipCMS 5.0.1 allows attackers to access sensitive information.

UReport v2.2.9 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the designer page which allows attackers to detect intranet device ports.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Blubrry PowerPress Podcasting plugin by Blubrry.This issue affects PowerPress Podcasting plugin by Blubrry: from n/a through 11.0.6.

A server-side request forgery vulnerability [CWE-918] in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0, version 7.2.0 through 7.2.3 and before 7.0.8 and FortiManager version 7.4.0, version 7.2.0 through 7.2.3 and before 7.0.8 allows a remote attacker with low privileges to view sensitive data from internal servers or perform a local port scan via a crafted HTTP request.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.8.

Apache Olingo versions 4.0.0 to 4.7.0 provide the AsyncRequestWrapperImpl class which reads a URL from the Location header, and then sends a GET or DELETE request to this URL. It may allow to implement a SSRF attack. If an attacker tricks a client to connect to a malicious server, the server can make the client call any URL including internal resources which are not directly accessible by the attacker.

The External Media without Import WordPress plugin through 1.1.2 does not have any authorisation and does to ensure that medias added via URLs are external medias, which could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to perform blind SSRF attacks

Cellopoint CelloOS v4.1.10 Build 20190922 does not validate URL inputted properly. With cookie of an authenticated user, attackers can temper with the URL parameter and access arbitrary file on system.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository gogs/gogs prior to 0.12.5.

In Gradle Enterprise before 2021.1.3, an attacker with the ability to perform SSRF attacks can potentially discover credentials for other resources.

Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in saveUrlAs function in ImagesService.java in sunkaifei FlyCMS version 20190503.

Bitwarden Server 1.35.1 allows SSRF because it does not consider certain IPv6 addresses (ones beginning with fc, fd, fe, or ff, and the :: address) and certain IPv4 addresses (0.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.0/8, and 169.254.0.0/16).

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository transloadit/uppy prior to 3.3.1.

Prometheus Blackbox Exporter through 0.17.0 allows /probe?target= SSRF. NOTE: follow-on discussion suggests that this might plausibly be interpreted as both intended functionality and also a vulnerability

JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.10643 was vulnerable to SSRF that allowed scanning internal ports.

A remote server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in Aruba Airwave Software version(s): Prior to 1.3.2.

Ligeo Archives Ligeo Basics as of 02_01-2022 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which allows an attacker to read any documents via the download features.

Misskey is an open source, decentralized microblogging platform. In affected versions a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability exists in "Upload from URL" and remote attachment handling. This could result in the disclosure of non-public information within the internal network. This has been fixed in 12.90.0. However, if you are using a proxy, you will need to take additional measures. As a workaround this exploit may be avoided by appropriately restricting access to private networks from the host where the application is running.

An issue was discovered in DigDash 2018R2 before p20200210 and 2019R1 before p20200210. The login page is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) that allows use of the application as a proxy. Sent to an external server, a forged request discloses application credentials. For a request to an internal component, the request is blind, but through the error message it's possible to determine whether the request targeted a open service.

The third party intelligence connector in Securonix SNYPR 6.3.1 Build 184295_0302 allows an authenticated user to obtain access to server configuration details via SSRF.

An SSRF vulnerability in Gotenberg through 6.2.1 exists in the remote URL to PDF conversion, which results in a remote attacker being able to read local files or fetch intranet resources.

An issue was discovered in MB connect line mymbCONNECT24 and mbCONNECT24 software in all versions through V2.6.2 There is a SSRF in the LDAP access check, allowing an attacker to scan for open ports.

Bottinelli Informatical Vedo Suite 2024.17 is vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the /api_vedo/video/preview endpoint, which allows remote authenticated attackers to trigger HTTP requests towards arbitrary remote paths via the "file" URL parameter.

ControlID iDSecure On-premises versions 4.7.48.0 and prior are vulnerable to a server-side request forgery vulnerability which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to retrieve information from other servers.