Stirling-PDF is a locally hosted web application that performs various operations on PDF files. Prior to version 1.1.0, the "convert file to pdf" functionality (/api/v1/convert/file/pdf) uses LibreOffice's unoconvert tool for conversion, and SSRF vulnerabilities exist during the conversion process. This issue has been patched in version 1.1.0.

SysJust Syuan-Gu-Da-Shih, versions before 20191223, contain vulnerability of Request Forgery, allowing attackers to launch inquiries into network architecture or system files of the server via forged inquests.

In certain Lexmark products through 2023-01-12, SSRF can occur because of a lack of input validation.

A remote server side request forgery (SSRF) remote code execution vulnerability was discovered in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version(s) prior to 6.9.5, 6.8.9, 6.7.14-HF1. Aruba has released patches for Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager that address this security vulnerability.

Stirling-PDF is a locally hosted web application that performs various operations on PDF files. Prior to version 1.1.0, when using the /api/v1/convert/html/pdf endpoint to convert HTML to PDF, the backend calls a third-party tool to process it and includes a sanitizer for security sanitization which can be bypassed and result in SSRF. This issue has been patched in version 1.1.0.

The ReplicationHandler (normally registered at "/replication" under a Solr core) in Apache Solr has a "masterUrl" (also "leaderUrl" alias) parameter that is used to designate another ReplicationHandler on another Solr core to replicate index data into the local core. To prevent a SSRF vulnerability, Solr ought to check these parameters against a similar configuration it uses for the "shards" parameter. Prior to this bug getting fixed, it did not. This problem affects essentially all Solr versions prior to it getting fixed in 8.8.2.

Esri ArcGIS Server before 10.8 is vulnerable to SSRF in some configurations.

A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability was found in concrete5 < 8.5.5 that allowed a decimal notation encoded IP address to bypass the limitations in place for localhost allowing interaction with local services. Impact can vary depending on services exposed.CVSSv2.0 AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Infoline Project Management System allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Project Management System: before 4.09.31.125.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes, Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in YugaByte, Inc. Yugabyte Managed allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs, Communication Channel Manipulation, Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Yugabyte Managed: from 2.0.0.0 through 2.13.0.0

The uppy npm package < 1.9.3 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, which allows an attacker to scan local or external network or otherwise interact with internal systems.

In JetBrains Hub before 2023.1.15725 SSRF protection in Auth Module integration was missing

Report v0.9.8.6 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.

A vulnerability was found in AWS SDK 2.59.0. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function XpathUtils of the file aws-android-sdk-core/src/main/java/com/amazonaws/util/XpathUtils.java of the component XML Parser. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. Upgrading to version 2.59.1 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is c3e6d69422e1f0c80fe53f2d757b8df97619af2b. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-216737 was assigned to this vulnerability.

Wildix WMS 6 before 6.02.20221216, WMS 5 before 5.04.20221214, and WMS4 before 4.04.45396.23 allows Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via ZohoClient.php.

SAP Netweaver AS ABAP, versions 700, 701, 702, 710, 711, 730, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, are vulnerable for Server Side Request Forgery Attack where in an attacker can use inappropriate path names containing malicious server names in the import/export of sessions functionality and coerce the web server into authenticating with the malicious server. Furthermore, if NTLM is setup the attacker can compromise confidentiality, integrity and availability of the SAP database.

A SSRF vulnerability in parsing the href attribute of XOP:Include in MTOM requests in versions of Apache CXF before 3.5.5 and 3.4.10 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type. 

Server Side Template Injection in Gambio 4.9.2.0 allows attackers to run arbitrary code via crafted smarty email template.

Whoogle Search is a self-hosted metasearch engine. In versions prior to 0.8.4, the `element` method in `app/routes.py` does not validate the user-controlled `src_type` and `element_url` variables and passes them to the `send` method which sends a GET request on lines 339-343 in `request.py`, which leads to a server-side request forgery. This issue allows for crafting GET requests to internal and external resources on behalf of the server. For example, this issue would allow for accessing resources on the internal network that the server has access to, even though these resources may not be accessible on the internet. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.4.

Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Web Compliance Manager in Quest Policy Authority version 8.1.2.200 allows attackers to scan internal ports and make outbound connections via the initFile.jsp file. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPWebinarSystem WebinarPress allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects WebinarPress: from n/a through 1.33.27.

ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the rss_url_news parameter at /manager/index.php.

kkFileView 4.0 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via controller\OnlinePreviewController.java.

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the addCustomThemePluginRepository function in index.php in WonderCMS 3.1.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL to the theme/plugin installer.

iCMS v7.0.16 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the url parameter at admincp.php.

ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the pkg_url parameter at /manager/index.php.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor on Linux (Data Center Analytics, Analytics probe components), Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer on Linux (Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer detail view, Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer probe components) allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor: from 2.0.0-00 through 4.4.0-00; Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer: from 10.0.0-00 before 10.9.0-00.

The application was vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery attacks, allowing the backend server to interact with unexpected endpoints, potentially including internal and local services, leading to attacks in other downstream systems.

A security issue was discovered in Z-BlogPHP <= 1.7.2. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the zb_users/plugin/UEditor/php/action_crawler.php file allows remote attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs into the source parameter.

A Server-Side Request Forgery issue in Canto Cumulus through 11.1.3 allows attackers to enumerate the internal network, overload network resources, and possibly have unspecified other impact via the server parameter to the /cwc/login login form.

An issue in the website background of taocms v3.0.2 allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

Zalando Skipper v0.13.236 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

aEnrich’s a+HRD has inadequate filtering for specific URL parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to send arbitrary HTTP(s) request to launch Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack, to perform arbitrary system command or disrupt service.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Varun Dubey Wbcom Designs - Activity Link Preview For BuddyPress allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Wbcom Designs - Activity Link Preview For BuddyPress: from n/a through 1.4.4.

A vulnerability was found in donglight bookstore电商书城系统说明 1.0.0. It has been classified as critical. This affects the function getHtml of the file src/main/java/org/zdd/bookstore/rawl/HttpUtil.java. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

A SSRF vulnerability exists in the downloadimage interface of CRMEB 3.0, which can remotely download arbitrary files on the server and remotely execute arbitrary code.

Unauthenticated server side request forgery in HPE Serviceguard Manager

Gluu Oxauth before v4.4.1 allows attackers to execute blind SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) attacks via a crafted request_uri parameter.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Rank Math SEO plugin <= 1.0.95 at WordPress.

undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `http://127.0.0.1` or `//127.0.0.1` ```js const undici = require("undici") undici.request({origin: "http://example.com", pathname: "//127.0.0.1"}) ``` Instead of processing the request as `http://example.org//127.0.0.1` (or `http://example.org/http://127.0.0.1` when `http://127.0.0.1 is used`), it actually processes the request as `http://127.0.0.1/` and sends it to `http://127.0.0.1`. If a developer passes in user input into `path` parameter of `undici.request`, it can result in an _SSRF_ as they will assume that the hostname cannot change, when in actual fact it can change because the specified path parameter is combined with the base URL. This issue was fixed in `undici@5.8.1`. The best workaround is to validate user input before passing it to the `undici.request` call.

wkhtmlTOpdf 0.12.6 is vulnerable to SSRF which allows an attacker to get initial access into the target's system by injecting iframe tag with initial asset IP address on it's source. This allows the attacker to takeover the whole infrastructure by accessing their internal assets.

zrlog v3.1.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the downloadUrl parameter.

Halo CMS v1.5.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the template remote download function.

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 10.2 through 11.11. Multiple features contained Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities caused by an insufficient validation to prevent DNS rebinding attacks.

Insufficient RegEx in private-ip npm package v1.0.5 and below insufficiently filters reserved IP ranges resulting in indeterminate SSRF. An attacker can perform a large range of requests to ARIN reserved IP ranges, resulting in an indeterminable number of critical attack vectors, allowing remote attackers to request server-side resources or potentially execute arbitrary code through various SSRF techniques.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Montonio Montonio for WooCommerce, Wpopal Wpopal Core Features, AMO for WP – Membership Management ArcStone wp-amo, Long Watch Studio WooVirtualWallet – A virtual wallet for WooCommerce, Long Watch Studio WooVIP – Membership plugin for WordPress and WooCommerce, Long Watch Studio WooSupply – Suppliers, Supply Orders and Stock Management, Squidesma Theme Minifier, Paul Clark Styles styles, Designmodo Inc. WordPress Page Builder – Qards, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) PHPFreeChat, Arun Basil Lal Custom Login Admin Front-end CSS, Team Agence-Press CSS Adder By Agence-Press, Unihost Confirm Data, deano1987 AMP Toolbox amp-toolbox, Arun Basil Lal Admin CSS MU.This issue affects Montonio for WooCommerce: from n/a through 6.0.1; Wpopal Core Features: from n/a through 1.5.8; ArcStone: from n/a through 4.6.6; WooVirtualWallet – A virtual wallet for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.2.1; WooVIP – Membership plugin for WordPress and WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.4.4; WooSupply – Suppliers, Supply Orders and Stock Management: from n/a through 1.2.2; Theme Minifier: from n/a through 2.0; Styles: from n/a through 1.2.3; WordPress Page Builder – Qards: from n/a through 1.0.5; PHPFreeChat: from n/a through 0.2.8; Custom Login Admin Front-end CSS: from n/a through 1.4.1; CSS Adder By Agence-Press: from n/a through 1.5.0; Confirm Data: from n/a through 1.0.7; AMP Toolbox: from n/a through 2.1.1; Admin CSS MU: from n/a through 2.6.

A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in HPE StoreOnce Software.

Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) and Proxmox Mail Gateway (PMG) are vulnerable to SSRF when proxying HTTP requests between pve(pmg)proxy and pve(pmg)daemon. An attacker with an unprivileged account can craft an HTTP request to achieve SSRF and file disclosure of any files on the server. Also, in Proxmox Mail Gateway, privilege escalation to the root@pam account is possible if the backup feature has ever been used, because backup files such as pmg-backup_YYYY_MM_DD_*.tgz have 0644 permissions and contain an authkey value. This is fixed in pve-http-server 4.1-3.

The iot-manager microservice 1.0.0 in Northern.tech Mender Enterprise before 3.2.2 allows SSRF because the Azure IoT Hub integration provides several SSRF primitives that can execute cross-tenant actions via internal API endpoints.

A remote server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in HPE OneView version(s): Prior to 7.0. HPE has provided a software update to resolve this vulnerability in HPE OneView.