Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in flusity-CMS v.2.33, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the add_menu.php component.
The Modal Window WordPress plugin before 5.2.2 within the wow-company admin menu page allows to include() arbitrary file with PHP extension (as well as with data:// or http:// protocols), thus leading to CSRF RCE.
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/user/group_save.
The multisite-post-duplicator plugin before 1.1.3 for WordPress has wp-admin/tools.php?page=mpd CSRF.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Borbis Media FreshMail For WordPress.This issue affects FreshMail For WordPress: from n/a through 2.3.2.
The Scripts Organizer WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have capability and CSRF checks in the saveScript AJAX action, available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users, and does not validate user input in any way, which could allow unauthenticated users to put arbitrary PHP code in a file
The Simple JWT Login WordPress plugin before 3.2.1 does not have nonce checks when saving its settings, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin changed them. Settings such as HMAC verification secret, account registering and default user roles can be updated, which could result in site takeover.
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/score/scorerule_save
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in livewire before v3.0.4, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code getCsrfToken function. NOTE: the vendor disputes this because the 5d88731 commit fixes a usability problem (HTTP 419 status codes for legitimate client activity), not a security problem.
Stupid Simple CMS <=1.2.4 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin-edit.php.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Western Bridge Cobub Razor 0.7.2 via /index.php?/user/createNewUser/, resulting in account creation.
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in SourceCodester Sales Tracker Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file admin/?page=user/list. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-221734 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.
The PageLines theme 1.1.4 for WordPress has wp-admin/admin-post.php?page=pagelines CSRF.
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/email/email_conf_updagte
pyLoad is a free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. The `pyload` API allows any API call to be made using GET requests. Since the session cookie is not set to `SameSite: strict`, this opens the library up to severe attack possibilities via a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. As a result any API call can be made via a CSRF attack by an unauthenticated user. This issue has been addressed in release `0.5.0b3.dev78`. All users are advised to upgrade.
Remote Cross-site Request forgery (CSRF) potential has been identified in UCMBD Browser version 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.15.1 which could allow for remote unsafe deserialization and cross-site request forgery (CSRF).
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/links/add_link
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerbility via /system/site/filterKeyword_save
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/score/del.
FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/email/email_templets_update.
A potential Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in ArcSight Management Center (ArcMC) in all versions prior to 2.81. This vulnerability could be exploited to allow for Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
Remote Cross-site Request forgery (CSRF) potential has been identified in UCMBD Server version DDM Content Pack V 10.20, 10.21, 10.22, 10.22 CUP7, 10.30, 10.31, 10.32, 10.33, 10.33 CUP2, 11.0 and CMS Server version 2018.05 BACKGROUND which could allow for remote unsafe deserialization and cross-site request forgery (CSRF).
mccms v2.6.3 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
The Video Share VOD – Turnkey Video Site Builder Script plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the adminExport() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and execute remote code when the Server command execution setting is enabled via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cozmoslabs Profile Builder Pro.This issue affects Profile Builder Pro: from n/a through 3.10.0.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Spell Check.This issue affects WP Spell Check: from n/a through 9.17.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DroitThemes Droit Elementor Addons – Widgets, Blocks, Templates Library For Elementor Builder.This issue affects Droit Elementor Addons – Widgets, Blocks, Templates Library For Elementor Builder: from n/a through 3.1.5.
Trendnet AC2600 TEW-827DRU version 2.08B01 does not properly implement csrf protections. Most pages lack proper usage of CSRF protections or mitigations. Additionally, pages that do make use of CSRF tokens are trivially bypassable as the server does not appear to validate them properly (i.e. re-using an old token or finding the token thru some other method is possible).
Machform prior to version 16 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery due to a lack of CSRF tokens in place.
The Button Generator WordPress plugin before 2.3.3 within the wow-company admin menu page allows to include() arbitrary file with PHP extension (as well as with data:// or http:// protocols), thus leading to CSRF RCE.
The LearnPress – WordPress LMS Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the filter_users functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to elevate their privileges to that of a teacher via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The BP Better Messages WordPress plugin before 1.9.9.41 does not check for CSRF in multiple of its AJAX actions: bp_better_messages_leave_chat, bp_better_messages_join_chat, bp_messages_leave_thread, bp_messages_mute_thread, bp_messages_unmute_thread, bp_better_messages_add_user_to_thread, bp_better_messages_exclude_user_from_thread. This could allow attackers to make logged in users do unwanted actions
In the Orange Form WordPress plugin through 1.0, the process_bulk_action() function in "admin/orange-form-email.php" performs an unprepared SQL query with an unsanitized parameter ($id). Only admin can access the page that invokes the function, but because of lack of CSRF protection, it is actually exploitable and could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary posts for example
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Atakan Au 1 click disable all.This issue affects 1 click disable all: from n/a through 1.0.1.
The WordPress Simple Ecommerce Shopping Cart Plugin- Sell products through Paypal plugin through 2.2.5 does not check for the uploaded Downloadable Digital product file, allowing any file, such as PHP to be uploaded by an administrator. Furthermore, as there is no CSRF in place, attackers could also make a logged admin upload a malicious PHP file, which would lead to RCE
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device with the privileges of the targeted user.
The Core Tweaks WP Setup WordPress plugin through 4.1 allows to bulk-set many settings in WordPress, including the admin email, as well as creating a new admin account. There is no CSRF protection in place, allowing an attacker to arbitrary change the admin email or create another admin account and takeover the website via CSRF attacks
The Ads Pro Plugin - Multi-Purpose WordPress Advertising Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.89. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bsaCreateAdTemplate function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
In the Reponsive Menu (free and Pro) WordPress plugins before 4.0.4, attackers could craft a request and trick an administrator into uploading a zip archive containing malicious PHP files. The attacker could then access those files to achieve remote code execution and further infect the targeted site.
Due to the lack of sanitization and lack of nonce protection on the custom CSS feature, an attacker could craft a request to inject malicious JavaScript on a site using the Contact Form 7 Style WordPress plugin through 3.1.9. If an attacker successfully tricked a site’s administrator into clicking a link or attachment, then the request could be sent and the CSS settings would be successfully updated to include malicious JavaScript.
The wp_ajax_nf_oauth_disconnect from the Ninja Forms Contact Form – The Drag and Drop Form Builder for WordPress WordPress plugin before 3.4.34 had no nonce protection making it possible for attackers to craft a request to disconnect a site's OAuth connection.
The Contact Form 7 Captcha WordPress plugin before 0.0.9 does not have any CSRF check in place when saving its settings, allowing attacker to make a logged in user with the manage_options change them. Furthermore, the settings are not escaped when output in attributes, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue.
The package joplin before 2.3.2 are vulnerable to Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) due to missing CSRF checks in various forms.
The Business Directory Plugin – Easy Listing Directories for WordPress WordPress plugin before 5.11 suffered from a Cross-Site Request Forgery issue, allowing an attacker to make a logged in administrator import files. As the plugin also did not validate uploaded files, it could lead to RCE.
The wp_ajax_save_fbe_settings and wp_ajax_delete_fbe_settings AJAX actions of the Facebook for WordPress plugin before 3.0.4 were vulnerable to CSRF due to a lack of nonce protection. The settings in the saveFbeSettings function had no sanitization allowing for script tags to be saved.
This affects all versions of package sqlite-web. The SQL dashboard area allows sensitive actions to be performed without validating that the request originated from the application. This could enable an attacker to trick a user into performing these actions unknowingly through a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack.
The Business Directory Plugin – Easy Listing Directories for WordPress WordPress plugin before 5.11.1 suffered from Cross-Site Request Forgery issues, allowing an attacker to make a logged in administrator add, edit or delete form fields, which could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues.
In the Reponsive Menu (free and Pro) WordPress plugins before 4.0.4, attackers could craft a request and trick an administrator into importing all new settings. These settings could be modified to include malicious JavaScript, therefore allowing an attacker to inject payloads that could aid in further infection of the site.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device with the privileges of the targeted user.
A CSRF in Concrete CMS version 8.5.5 and below allows an attacker to clone topics which can lead to UI inconvenience, and exhaustion of disk space.Credit for discovery: "Solar Security Research Team"