An issue was discovered in SmartStoreNET before 4.1.0. Lack of Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection may lead to elevation of privileges (e.g., /admin/customer/create to create an admin account).
The Bread & Butter: Gate content + Capture leads + Collect first-party data + Nurture with Ai agents plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.11.1374. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the uploadImage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files that make remote code execution possible via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Social Login WP plugin <= 5.0.0.0 versions.
Busybox 1.31.1 - Multiple Known Vulnerabilities.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Winkler teachPress.This issue affects teachPress: from n/a through 9.0.5.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SoftLab Integrate Google Drive.This issue affects Integrate Google Drive: from n/a through 1.3.4.
In ftcms 2.1, there is a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the PHP page, which causes the attacker to forge a link to trick him to click on a malicious link or visit a page containing attack code, and send a request to the server (corresponding to the identity authentication information) as the victim without the victim's knowledge.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability Backup Scheduler plugin <= 1.5.13 at WordPress.
The CAPTCHA 4WP WordPress plugin before 7.1.0 lets user input reach a sensitive require_once call in one of its admin-side templates. This can be abused by attackers, via a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack to run arbitrary code on the server.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mod/user/act_user.php in Garfield Petshop through 2020-10-01 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative accounts.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Your_account module in CMSphp 0.21 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change an administrator password via the pseudo, pwd, and uid parameters in an admin_info_user_verif action.
TypesetterCMS v5.1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which is exploited via a crafted POST request.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Analytify plugin <= 4.2.2 on WordPress.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shortcodes Ultimate plugin <= 5.12.0 at WordPress leading to plugin preset settings change.
In FileCloud before 21.3, the CSV user import functionality is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in ioLogik E1200 Series firmware versions v3.3 and prior. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to trick a client into making an unintentional request to the web server, which will be treated as an authentic request. This vulnerability may lead an attacker to perform operations on behalf of the victimized user.
Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects D6200 before 1.1.00.38, D7000 before 1.0.1.78, JR6150 before 1.0.1.24, R6020 before 1.0.0.42, R6050 before 1.0.1.24, R6080 before 1.0.0.42, R6120 before 1.0.0.66, R6220 before 1.1.0.100, R6260 before 1.1.0.64, R6700v2 before 1.2.0.62, R6800 before 1.2.0.62, R6900v2 before 1.2.0.62, R7450 before 1.2.0.62, and WNR2020 before 1.1.0.62.
Cross-site request forgery attacks can be carried out against the Eyes of Network web application, due to an absence of adequate protections. An attacker can, for instance, delete the admin user by directing an authenticated user to the URL https://<target-address>/module/admin_user/index.php?DataTables_Table_0_length=10&user_selected%5B%5D=1&user_mgt_list=delete_user&action=submit by means of a crafted link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) leading to plugin settings update in YooMoney ЮKassa для WooCommerce plugin <= 2.3.0 at WordPress.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in WPChill Gallery PhotoBlocks plugin <= 1.2.6 at WordPress.
The Core component of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO iProcess Workspace (Browser) contains a vulnerability that theoretically allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to execute a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack on the affected system. A successful attack using this vulnerability requires human interaction from an authenticated user other than the attacker. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO iProcess Workspace (Browser): versions 11.6.0 and below.
An issue was discovered in jizhicms v2.3.1. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can add a admin.
Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security Virtual Appliance (IMSVA) 9.1 is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability which could allow an attacker to modify policy rules by tricking an authenticated administrator into accessing an attacker-controlled web page. An attacker must already have obtained product administrator/root privileges to exploit this vulnerability.
Shop Beat Solutions (Pty) LTD Shop Beat Media Player 2.5.95 up to 3.2.57 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was discovered in iCMS 7.0.16 which can allow an attacker to execute arbitrary web scripts.
A CSRF issue was discovered in Intland codeBeamer ALM 10.x through 10.1.SP4. Requests sent to the server that trigger actions do not contain a CSRF token and can therefore be entirely predicted allowing attackers to cause the victim's browser to execute undesired actions in the web application through crafted requests.
The WPQA Builder WordPress plugin before 5.9 does not have CSRF check when following and unfollowing users, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform such actions via CSRF attacks
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SEO Scout plugin <= 0.9.83 at WordPress allows attackers to trick users with administrative rights to unintentionally change the plugin settings.
Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Nexus Dashboard could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands, read or upload container image files, or perform a cross-site request forgery attack. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
forma.lms 2.3.0.2 is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in formalms/appCore/index.php?r=lms/profile/show&ap=saveinfo via a GET request to change the admin email address in order to accomplish an account takeover.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TeraWallet – For WooCommerce plugin <= 1.3.24 versions.
USVN (aka User-friendly SVN) before 1.0.10 allows CSRF, related to the lack of the SameSite Strict feature.
NodeBB Forum Software is powered by Node.js and supports either Redis, MongoDB, or a PostgreSQL database. Due to an unnecessarily strict conditional in the code handling the first step of the SSO process, the pre-existing logic that added (and later checked) a nonce was inadvertently rendered opt-in instead of opt-out. This re-exposed a vulnerability in that a specially crafted Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack could theoretically take over another user account during the single sign-on process. The issue has been fully patched in version 1.17.2.
Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Max Foundry MaxButtons plugin <= 9.2 at WordPress.
Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in W3 Eden Download Manager plugin <= 3.2.48 at WordPress.
An issue was discovered in fs.com S3900 24T4S 1.7.0 and earlier. The form does not have an authentication or token authentication mechanism that allows remote attackers to forge requests on behalf of a site administrator to change all settings including deleting users, creating new users with escalated privileges.
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Health Advisor by CloudBees Plugin 3.0 and earlier allows attackers to send an email with fixed content to an attacker-specified recipient.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device with the privileges of the target user.
An issue was discovered in SolarWinds N-Central 12.3.0.670. The AdvancedScripts HTTP endpoint allows CSRF.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPlus Better Messages plugin <= 1.9.9.148 at WordPress.
SAP BusinessObjects CMC allows an unauthenticated attacker to retrieve token information over the network which would otherwise be restricted. This can be achieved only when a legitimate user accesses the application and a local compromise occurs, like sniffing or social engineering. On successful exploitation, the attacker can completely compromise the application.
The Free Live Chat Support plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.0.11. This is due to missing nonce protection on the livesupporti_settings() function found in the ~/livesupporti.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts into the page, granted they can trick a site's administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Easergy T300 (Firmware version 1.5.2 and older) which could allow an attacker to execute malicious commands on behalf of a legitimate user when xsrf-token data is intercepted.
A weakness has been identified in givanz Vvveb up to 1.0.7.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Executing manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. Once again the project maintainer reacted very professional: "I accept the existence of these vulnerabilities. (...) I fixed the code to remove these vulnerabilities and will push the code to github and make a new release."
A CSRF vulnerability in the UPnP MediaServer implementation in Freebox Server before 4.2.3.
An issue was discovered in Quadbase EspressReports ES 7 Update 9. It allows CSRF, whereby an attacker may be able to trick an authenticated admin level user into uploading malicious files to the web server.
The Button Widget Smartsoft plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the smartsoftbutton_settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
IBM Security Verify Information Queue 10.0.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 230814.
The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in all versions up to, and including, 9.0.46. This is due to the plugin exposing state-changing REST actions through an AJAX bridge without proper CSRF token validation, and having destructive logic reachable via GET requests with no permission_callback. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force logged-in administrators to create, update, or delete markers and geometry features via CSRF attacks, and allows anonymous users to trigger mass deletion of markers via unsafe GET requests.
The Insights from Google PageSpeed WordPress plugin before 4.0.7 does not verify for CSRF before doing various actions such as deleting Custom URLs, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such actions via CSRF attacks