Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2023-34013

Summary
Assigner-Patchstack
Assigner Org ID-21595511-bba5-4825-b968-b78d1f9984a3
Published At-13 Nov, 2023 | 02:28
Updated At-28 Apr, 2026 | 16:08
Rejected At-
Credits

WordPress Poll Maker Plugin <= 4.6.2 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Poll Maker Team Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin.This issue affects Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin: from n/a through 4.6.2.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:Patchstack
Assigner Org ID:21595511-bba5-4825-b968-b78d1f9984a3
Published At:13 Nov, 2023 | 02:28
Updated At:28 Apr, 2026 | 16:08
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
WordPress Poll Maker Plugin <= 4.6.2 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Poll Maker Team Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin.This issue affects Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin: from n/a through 4.6.2.

Affected Products
Vendor
AYS Pro ExtensionsPoll Maker Team
Product
Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin
Collection URL
https://wordpress.org/plugins
Package Name
poll-maker
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From n/a through 4.6.2 (custom)
    • -> unaffectedfrom4.6.3
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-918CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-918
Description: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.14.4MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 4.4
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Update to 4.6.3 or a higher version.

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

finder
Abu Hurayra (Patchstack Alliance)
Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/poll-maker/wordpress-poll-maker-plugin-4-6-2-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
vdb-entry
Hyperlink: https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/poll-maker/wordpress-poll-maker-plugin-4-6-2-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
Resource:
vdb-entry
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/poll-maker/wordpress-poll-maker-plugin-4-6-2-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
vdb-entry
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/poll-maker/wordpress-poll-maker-plugin-4-6-2-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
Resource:
vdb-entry
x_transferred
2. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:audit@patchstack.com
Published At:13 Nov, 2023 | 03:15
Updated At:17 Nov, 2023 | 21:27

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Poll Maker Team Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin.This issue affects Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin: from n/a through 4.6.2.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Secondary3.14.4MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 4.4
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CPE Matches

AYS Pro Extensions
ays-pro
>>poll_maker>>Versions up to 4.6.2(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:ays-pro:poll_maker:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-918Primaryaudit@patchstack.com
CWE ID: CWE-918
Type: Primary
Source: audit@patchstack.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/poll-maker/wordpress-poll-maker-plugin-4-6-2-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cveaudit@patchstack.com
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/poll-maker/wordpress-poll-maker-plugin-4-6-2-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
Source: audit@patchstack.com
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

281Records found

CVE-2024-10628
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.66% / 47.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jan, 2025 | 05:24
Updated-27 Sep, 2025 | 00:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Quiz Maker Business, Developer, and Agency <= (Multiple Versions) - Unauthenticated SQL Injection via id

The Quiz Maker Business, Developer, and Agency plugins for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘id’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 8.8.0 (Business), up to, and including, 21.8.0 (Developer), and up to, and including, 31.8.0 (Agency) due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. NOTE: The three variations of this software (Business, Developer, and Agency) share the same plugin slug, so you may get an alert even if you are running the latest version of any of the pieces of software. In these cases it is safe to dismiss the notice once you've confirmed your site is on a patched version of the applicable software.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-AYS Pro Extensions
Product-quiz_makerQuiz Maker BusinessQuiz Maker AgencyQuiz Maker Developer
CWE ID-CWE-89
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
CVE-2025-12426
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.32% / 24.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Nov, 2025 | 04:28
Updated-08 Apr, 2026 | 17:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Quiz Maker <= 6.7.0.80 - Unauthenticated Sensitive Information Exposure

The Quiz Maker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 6.7.0.80. This is due to the plugin exposing quiz answers through the ays_quiz_check_answer AJAX action without proper authorization checks. The endpoint only validates a nonce, but that same nonce is publicly available to all site visitors via the quiz_maker_ajax_public localized script data. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including quiz answers for any quiz question.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-AYS Pro Extensions
Product-quiz_makerQuiz Maker
CWE ID-CWE-200
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CVE-2025-10042
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.88% / 55.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Sep, 2025 | 05:18
Updated-08 Apr, 2026 | 16:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Quiz Maker <= 6.7.0.56 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection

The Quiz Maker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via spoofed IP headers in all versions up to, and including, 6.7.0.56 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. This is only exploitable in configurations where the server is set up to retrieve the IP from a user-supplied field like `X-Forwarded-For` and limit users by IP is enabled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-AYS Pro Extensions
Product-quiz_makerQuiz Maker
CWE ID-CWE-89
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
CVE-2024-8488
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 18.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Oct, 2024 | 11:04
Updated-08 Apr, 2026 | 16:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Survey Maker – Customer Satisfaction Questionnaire, Chat Survey, Calculation Form, Payment Forms <= 4.9.7 - Authenticated (Admin+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting

The Survey Maker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Survey fields in all versions up to, and including, 4.9.7 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-AYS Pro Extensions
Product-survey_makerSurvey Maker
CWE ID-CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
CVE-2024-7713
Matching Score-8
Assigner-WPScan
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-WPScan
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.30% / 22.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2024 | 06:00
Updated-27 Aug, 2025 | 12:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
AI Chatbot with ChatGPT by AYS <= 2.0.9 - Unauthenticated OpenAI Key Disclosure

The AI ChatBot with ChatGPT and Content Generator by AYS WordPress plugin before 2.1.0 discloses the Open AI API Key, allowing unauthenticated users to obtain it

Action-Not Available
Vendor-UnknownAYS Pro Extensions
Product-chatgpt_assistantAI ChatBot with ChatGPT and Content Generator by AYSai_chatbot_with_chatgpt
CWE ID-CWE-201
Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data
CWE ID-CWE-319
Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information
CVE-2025-58015
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Patchstack
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Patchstack
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.31% / 23.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Sep, 2025 | 18:24
Updated-12 May, 2026 | 00:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
WordPress Quiz Maker Plugin <= 6.7.0.65 - Sensitive Data Exposure Vulnerability

Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in Ays Pro Quiz Maker quiz-maker allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects Quiz Maker: from n/a through <= 6.7.0.65.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-AYS Pro Extensions
Product-quiz_makerQuiz Maker
CWE ID-CWE-497
Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere
CVE-2021-24651
Matching Score-8
Assigner-WPScan
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-WPScan
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.59% / 73.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 10:45
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 19:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Poll Maker < 3.4.2 - Unauthenticated Time Based SQL Injection

The Poll Maker WordPress plugin before 3.4.2 allows unauthenticated users to perform SQL injection via the ays_finish_poll AJAX action. While the result is not disclosed in the response, it is possible to use a timing attack to exfiltrate data such as password hash.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-UnknownAYS Pro Extensions
Product-poll_makerPoll Maker
CWE ID-CWE-89
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-203
Observable Discrepancy
CVE-2025-15611
Matching Score-6
Assigner-WPScan
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-WPScan
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 3.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Apr, 2026 | 06:00
Updated-09 Apr, 2026 | 19:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Popup Box AYS Pro < 5.5.0 - Admin+ Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via CSRF

The Popup Box WordPress plugin before 5.5.0 does not properly validate nonces in the add_or_edit_popupbox() function before saving popup data, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. When an authenticated admin visits a malicious page, the attacker can create or modify popups with arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the admin panel and frontend.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-UnknownAYS Pro Extensions
Product-popup_boxPopup Box
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CWE ID-CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
CWE ID-CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
CVE-2025-13378
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.28% / 20.03%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-27 Nov, 2025 | 09:27
Updated-08 Apr, 2026 | 16:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
AI ChatBot with ChatGPT and Content Generator by AYS <= 2.7.0 - Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery via 'pinecone_url' Parameter

The AI ChatBot with ChatGPT and Content Generator by AYS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.0 via the ays_chatgpt_pinecone_upsert function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-AYS Pro Extensions
Product-AI ChatBot with ChatGPT and Content Generator by AYS
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-33627
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.29% / 21.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Apr, 2024 | 07:42
Updated-28 Apr, 2026 | 16:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
WordPress AGCA – Custom Dashboard & Login Page plugin <= 7.2.2 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Cusmin Absolutely Glamorous Custom Admin.This issue affects Absolutely Glamorous Custom Admin: from n/a through 7.2.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cusmin
Product-Absolutely Glamorous Custom Admin
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-32987
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.91% / 77.57%
||
7 Day CHG-0.43%
Published-09 Jul, 2024 | 17:02
Updated-10 Feb, 2026 | 23:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Microsoft SharePoint Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Microsoft SharePoint Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016Microsoft SharePoint Server 2019Microsoft SharePoint Server Subscription Edition
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-32454
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.29% / 21.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Apr, 2024 | 07:13
Updated-28 Apr, 2026 | 16:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
WordPress Wappointment plugin <= 2.6.0 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Wappointment Appointment Bookings for Zoom GoogleMeet and more – Wappointment.This issue affects Appointment Bookings for Zoom GoogleMeet and more – Wappointment: from n/a through 2.6.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Wappointment
Product-Appointment Bookings for Zoom GoogleMeet and more – Wappointment
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-65496
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 5.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jul, 2026 | 11:19
Updated-23 Jul, 2026 | 15:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
WordPress Complianz plugin <= 7.5.0 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Author Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Complianz <= 7.5.0 versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Complianz
Product-Complianz
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-32430
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.35% / 27.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Apr, 2024 | 07:14
Updated-28 Apr, 2026 | 16:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
WordPress ActiveCampaign plugin <= 8.1.14 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ActiveCampaign.This issue affects ActiveCampaign: from n/a through 8.1.14.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ActiveCampaign
Product-activecampaignActiveCampaign
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-28111
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.7||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.56% / 42.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2023 | 17:00
Updated-25 Feb, 2025 | 14:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Discourse vulnerable to SSRF protection bypass possible with IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to version 3.1.0.beta3 of the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches, attackers are able to bypass Discourse's server-side request forgery (SSRF) protection for private IPv4 addresses by using a IPv4-mapped IPv6 address. The issue is patched in the latest beta and tests-passed version of Discourse. version 3.1.0.beta3 of the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches. There are no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Civilized Discourse Construction Kit, Inc.
Product-discoursediscourse
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-6514
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.27% / 19.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 May, 2026 | 08:24
Updated-14 May, 2026 | 14:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
InfusedWoo Pro <= 5.1.2 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Read via 'url' Parameter

The InfusedWoo Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.2 via the popup_submit. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Infused Addons
Product-InfusedWoo Pro
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-26492
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.96% / 57.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Mar, 2023 | 21:49
Updated-25 Feb, 2025 | 15:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Directus vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery On File Import

Directus is a real-time API and App dashboard for managing SQL database content. Directus is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) when importing a file from a remote web server (POST to `/files/import`). An attacker can bypass the security controls by performing a DNS rebinding attack and view sensitive data from internal servers or perform a local port scan. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to access highly sensitive internal server(s) and steal sensitive information. This issue was fixed in version 9.23.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-monospacedirectus
Product-directusdirectus
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-27159
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-36.17% / 98.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Mar, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-09 Jul, 2026 | 01:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Appwrite up to v1.2.1 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /v1/avatars/favicon. This vulnerability allows attackers to access network resources and sensitive information via a crafted GET request.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-appwriten/a
Product-appwriten/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-26735
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.88% / 55.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Apr, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-09 Jul, 2026 | 01:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

blackbox_exporter v0.23.0 was discovered to contain an access control issue in its probe interface. This vulnerability allows attackers to detect intranet ports and services, as well as download resources. NOTE: this is disputed by third parties because authentication can be configured.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-prometheusn/a
Product-blackbox_exportern/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-27161
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.96% / 57.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Mar, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-09 Jul, 2026 | 01:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jellyfin up to v10.7.7 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /Repositories. This vulnerability allows attackers to access network resources and sensitive information via a crafted POST request.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jellyfinn/a
Product-jellyfinn/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-25557
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.68% / 48.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Feb, 2023 | 22:03
Updated-03 Dec, 2025 | 21:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Server-Side Request Forgery in DataHub

DataHub is an open-source metadata platform. The DataHub frontend acts as a proxy able to forward any REST or GraphQL requests to the backend. The goal of this proxy is to perform authentication if needed and forward HTTP requests to the DataHub Metadata Store (GMS). It has been discovered that the proxy does not adequately construct the URL when forwarding data to GMS, allowing external users to reroute requests from the DataHub Frontend to any arbitrary hosts. As a result attackers may be able to reroute a request from originating from the frontend proxy to any other server and return the result. This vulnerability was discovered and reported by the GitHub Security lab and is tracked as GHSL-2022-076.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-datahubdatahub-project
Product-datahubdatahub
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-25262
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.89% / 55.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Mar, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-09 Jul, 2026 | 01:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Stimulsoft GmbH Stimulsoft Designer (Web) 2023.1.3 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). TThe Reporting Designer (Web) offers the possibility to embed sources from external locations. If the user chooses an external location, the request to that resource is performed by the server rather than the client. Therefore, the server causes outbound traffic and potentially imports data. An attacker may also leverage this behaviour to exfiltrate data of machines on the internal network of the server hosting the Stimulsoft Reporting Designer (Web).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stimulsoftn/a
Product-designern/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-29198
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.92% / 77.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jun, 2025 | 14:27
Updated-26 Aug, 2025 | 16:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
GeoServer Vulnerable to Unauthenticated SSRF via TestWfsPost

GeoServer is an open source software server written in Java that allows users to share and edit geospatial data. It possible to achieve Service Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the Demo request endpoint if Proxy Base URL has not been set. Upgrading to GeoServer 2.24.4, or 2.25.2, removes the TestWfsPost servlet resolving this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-osgeogeoserver
Product-geoservergeoserver
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-29736
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.03% / 60.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jul, 2024 | 08:50
Updated-15 Nov, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache CXF: SSRF vulnerability via WADL stylesheet parameter

A SSRF vulnerability in WADL service description in versions of Apache CXF before 4.0.5, 3.6.4 and 3.5.9 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on REST webservices. The attack only applies if a custom stylesheet parameter is configured.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-cxfApache CXFcxf
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-29190
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.71% / 49.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Mar, 2024 | 22:12
Updated-30 Jun, 2025 | 13:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
MobSF SSRF Vulnerability on assetlinks_check(act_name, well_knowns)

Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. In version 3.9.5 Beta and prior, MobSF does not perform any input validation when extracting the hostnames in `android:host`, so requests can also be sent to local hostnames. This can lead to server-side request forgery. An attacker can cause the server to make a connection to internal-only services within the organization's infrastructure. Commit 5a8eeee73c5f504a6c3abdf2a139a13804efdb77 has a hotfix for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
Product-mobile_security_frameworkMobile-Security-Framework-MobSFmobile_security_framework
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-55993
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.78% / 52.27%
||
7 Day CHG+0.25%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:13
Updated-09 Jul, 2026 | 03:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel Atmosphere Websocket: The inbound consumer maps externally-supplied WebSocket query parameters into the Exchange without a HeaderFilterStrategy, allowing injection of Camel control headers - enabling influencing internal behaviour

Improper Input Validation, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel in Atmosphere Websocket Component. The camel-atmosphere-websocket consumer mapped inbound WebSocket query parameters into the Camel Exchange header map without applying any HeaderFilterStrategy (WebsocketConsumer.sendEventNotification() iterates the query-string map collected in WebsocketConsumer.service() and copies each entry into the Exchange). Because nothing blocked the Camel header namespace, a client connecting to the WebSocket endpoint could set Camel-internal control headers - including CamelHttpUri (Exchange.HTTP_URI) - simply by supplying them as query parameters. In a route where the WebSocket consumer feeds a downstream HTTP producer, the injected CamelHttpUri redirects the server-side HTTP request to an attacker-chosen destination (server-side request forgery - for example to an internal service or a cloud metadata endpoint). In addition, the HTTP producer resolves Camel property placeholders on the resulting (attacker-controlled) URI, so placeholders embedded in the injected value - such as an environment-variable reference, an application property, or a vault reference - are resolved to their real values and sent to the attacker, disclosing environment variables, application properties and vault secrets. When the WebSocket endpoint is exposed without authentication, this is reachable by an unauthenticated remote attacker. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. The fix makes the consumer apply the HeaderFilterStrategy it already inherits from the HTTP/servlet stack, filtering the Camel header namespace case-insensitively on inbound mapping, so externally-supplied Camel* / camel* headers are no longer copied into the Exchange. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the Camel control headers from the inbound message before they reach any downstream producer (for example removeHeaders('Camel*') and removeHeaders('camel*') at the start of the route), require authentication on the WebSocket endpoint, and avoid bridging an untrusted consumer directly into an HTTP producer whose target URI can be driven from message headers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel Atmosphere Websocket
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-200
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-55994
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.62% / 46.15%
||
7 Day CHG+0.22%
Published-06 Jul, 2026 | 08:13
Updated-09 Jul, 2026 | 03:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Camel Iggy: The inbound consumer maps externally-supplied Iggy message user-headers into the Exchange without a HeaderFilterStrategy, allowing injection of Camel control headers - enabling control over internal behaviour

Improper Input Validation, Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel in Iggy component. The camel-iggy consumer mapped the user-headers of inbound Iggy messages into the Camel Exchange header map without applying any HeaderFilterStrategy (IggyFetchRecords copied the message user-headers straight into the Exchange). Because nothing blocked the Camel header namespace, an actor able to publish to the consumed Iggy stream/topic could set Camel-internal control headers - including CamelHttpUri (Exchange.HTTP_URI) - simply by supplying them as message user-headers. In a route where the Iggy consumer feeds a downstream HTTP producer, the injected CamelHttpUri redirects the server-side HTTP request to an attacker-chosen destination (server-side request forgery - for example to an internal service or a cloud metadata endpoint). In addition, the HTTP producer resolves Camel property placeholders on the resulting (attacker-controlled) URI, so placeholders embedded in the injected value - such as an environment-variable reference, an application property, or a vault reference - are resolved to their real values and sent to the attacker, disclosing environment variables, application properties and vault secrets. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.17.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. The fix adds a dedicated IggyHeaderFilterStrategy (and a headerFilterStrategy endpoint option) that filters the Camel header namespace case-insensitively on inbound mapping, so externally-supplied Camel* / camel* headers are no longer copied into the Exchange. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the Camel control headers from the inbound message before they reach any downstream producer (for example removeHeaders('Camel*') and removeHeaders('camel*') at the start of the route), restrict who can publish to the consumed Iggy stream/topic, and avoid bridging an untrusted consumer directly into an HTTP producer whose target URI can be driven from message headers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-camelApache Camel Iggy
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-200
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-27620
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-2.33% / 81.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-09 Jul, 2026 | 01:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue in Ladder v.0.0.1 thru v.0.0.21 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted request to the API.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aeverywall
Product-n/aladder
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-24243
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-4.00% / 89.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jun, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-12 Dec, 2024 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

CData RSB Connect v22.0.8336 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCData Software, Inc.
Product-arcn/a
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-24485
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-5.35% / 91.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Jul, 2025 | 13:36
Updated-03 Nov, 2025 | 20:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in the cecho.php functionality of MedDream PACS Premium 7.3.5.860. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to SSRF. An attacker can make an unauthenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-meddreamMedDream
Product-pacs_serverMedDream PACS Premium
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-56261
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.2||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.37% / 29.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2026 | 13:57
Updated-14 Jul, 2026 | 21:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Crawl4AI - Server-Side Request Forgery via Webhook URLs

Crawl4AI before 0.8.7 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Docker API server's /crawl/job and /llm/job endpoints, which accept webhook URLs without destination validation. An attacker can supply webhook URLs pointing to private or internal IP ranges, Docker networks, or cloud metadata endpoints (e.g. 169.254.169.254), causing the server to make requests to internal services and potentially expose cloud metadata.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-kidocodeCrawl4AI
Product-crawl4aiCrawl4AI
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-55229
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 28.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2026 | 20:35
Updated-13 Jul, 2026 | 17:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Gotenberg: SSRF via LibreOffice document processing

Gotenberg is a Docker-powered stateless API for PDF files. Prior to 8.34.0, Gotenberg's /forms/libreoffice/convert endpoint allows a specially crafted document to cause LibreOffice to automatically retrieve external HTTP(S) resources and local file resources during document conversion, enabling blind SSRF and limited local file disclosure via linked image resource loading. This issue is fixed in version 8.34.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-gotenberg
Product-gotenberg
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-36560
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-9.2||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.46% / 37.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 May, 2025 | 08:08
Updated-30 Sep, 2025 | 19:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in a-blog cms multiple versions. If this vulnerability is exploited, a remote unauthenticated attacker may gain access to sensitive information by sending a specially crafted request.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-applepleappleple inc.
Product-a-blog_cmsa-blog cms
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-3572
Matching Score-4
Assigner-TWCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-TWCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.44% / 36.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Apr, 2025 | 01:38
Updated-02 Mar, 2026 | 16:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
INTUMIT SmartRobot - Server-Side Request Forgery

SmartRobot from INTUMIT has a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to probe internal network and even access arbitrary local files on the server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-intumitINTUMIT
Product-smartrobotSmartRobot
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-22493
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.78% / 52.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jan, 2023 | 14:28
Updated-10 Mar, 2025 | 21:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
RSSHub is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery)

RSSHub is an open source RSS feed generator. RSSHub is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. This vulnerability allows an attacker to send arbitrary HTTP requests from the server to other servers or resources on the network. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a request to the affected routes with a malicious URL. An attacker could also use this vulnerability to send requests to internal or any other servers or resources on the network, potentially gain access to sensitive information that would not normally be accessible and amplifying the impact of the attack. The patch for this issue can be found in commit a66cbcf.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rsshubDIYgod
Product-rsshubRSSHub
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-23684
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.45% / 36.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2023 | 03:01
Updated-28 Apr, 2026 | 19:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
WordPress WPGraphQL Plugin <= 1.14.5 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPGraphQL.This issue affects WPGraphQL: from n/a through 1.14.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wpengineWPGraphQL
Product-wpgraphqlWPGraphQL
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-53755
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 21.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jun, 2026 | 18:15
Updated-29 Jun, 2026 | 16:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Crawl4AI: SSRF via proxy settings in the Docker server bypasses the crawl-URL SSRF check

Crawl4AI is an open-source LLM friendly web crawler & scraper. Prior to 0.8.9, the Docker API server applied its SSRF destination check to the crawl target URL only, not to the proxy address. An unauthenticated request could supply a proxy pointing at an internal IP and route the browser through it, reaching internal services and cloud-metadata endpoints, while using a perfectly valid crawl URL. The Docker API is unauthenticated by default. /crawl, /crawl/stream, and /crawl/job accept a browser_config (and crawler_config). The following all feed Chromium's egress and were unchecked: browser_config.proxy_config.server, browser_config.proxy (deprecated field), crawler_config.proxy_config.server, and --proxy-server / --proxy-pac-url / --proxy-bypass-list / --host-resolver-rules flags in browser_config.extra_args. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.8.9.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-kidocodeunclecode
Product-crawl4aicrawl4ai
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-21761
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.59% / 73.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-01 Jan, 2025 | 00:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Microsoft Exchange Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Microsoft Exchange Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-exchange_serverMicrosoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 11Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 Cumulative Update 23Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 12
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-23838
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.53% / 41.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jan, 2024 | 16:26
Updated-23 Aug, 2024 | 18:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
TrueLayer.Client SSRF when fetching payment or payment provider

TrueLayer.NET is the .Net client for TrueLayer. The vulnerability could potentially allow a malicious actor to gain control over the destination URL of the HttpClient used in the API classes. For applications using the SDK, requests to unexpected resources on local networks or to the internet could be made which could lead to information disclosure. The issue can be mitigated by having strict egress rules limiting the destinations to which requests can be made, and applying strict validation to any user input passed to the `truelayer-dotnet` library. Versions of TrueLayer.Client `v1.6.0` and later are not affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-truelayerTrueLayertruelayer
Product-truelayer.nettruelayer-dotnettruelayer.net
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-31490
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.47% / 38.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Apr, 2025 | 23:07
Updated-05 Aug, 2025 | 17:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
AutoGPT allows SSRF due to DNS Rebinding in requests wrapper

AutoGPT is a platform that allows users to create, deploy, and manage continuous artificial intelligence agents that automate complex workflows. Prior to 0.6.1, AutoGPT allows SSRF due to DNS Rebinding in requests wrapper. AutoGPT is built with a wrapper around Python's requests library, hardening the application against SSRF. The code for this wrapper can be found in autogpt_platform/backend/backend/util/request.py. The requested hostname of a URL which is being requested is validated, ensuring that it does not resolve to any local ipv4 or ipv6 addresses. However, this check is not sufficient, as a DNS server may initially respond with a non-blocked address, with a TTL of 0. This means that the initial resolution would appear as a non-blocked address. In this case, validate_url() will return the url as successful. After validate_url() has successfully returned the url, the url is then passed to the real request() function. When the real request() function is called with the validated url, request() will once again resolve the address of the hostname, because the record will not have been cached (due to TTL 0). This resolution may be in the "invalid range". This type of attack is called a "DNS Rebinding Attack". This vulnerability is fixed in 0.6.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-agptSignificant-Gravitas
Product-autogpt_platformAutoGPT
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2023-2140
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dassault Systèmes
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dassault Systèmes
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.56% / 43.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2023 | 15:48
Updated-04 Feb, 2025 | 20:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability affecting DELMIA Apriso Release 2017 through Release 2022

A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in DELMIA Apriso Release 2017 through Release 2022 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to issue requests to arbitrary hosts on behalf of the server running the DELMIA Apriso application.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dassault Systèmes S.E. (3DS)
Product-delmia_aprisoDELMIA Apriso
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-30678
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Trend Micro, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Trend Micro, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 22.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jun, 2025 | 19:56
Updated-08 Sep, 2025 | 21:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) modTMSM component could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft CorporationTrend Micro Incorporated
Product-apex_centralwindowsTrend Micro Apex Central
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-30679
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Trend Micro, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Trend Micro, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 22.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jun, 2025 | 19:56
Updated-08 Sep, 2025 | 21:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) modOSCE component could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft CorporationTrend Micro Incorporated
Product-apex_centralwindowsTrend Micro Apex Central
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-6812
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 16.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 May, 2026 | 05:29
Updated-05 May, 2026 | 19:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Ona <= 1.26 - Authenticated (Administrator+) Blind Server-Side Request Forgery via 'download_link' Parameter

The Ona theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.26 via the ona_activate_child_theme. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-deothemes
Product-Ona
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-30914
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 15.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2025 | 10:55
Updated-28 Apr, 2026 | 16:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
WordPress Metform Elementor Contact Form Builder plugin <= 3.9.7 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Roxnor Metform metform allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Metform: from n/a through <= 3.9.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Roxnor
Product-Metform
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-31117
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.44% / 36.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Mar, 2025 | 16:49
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 16:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OpenEMR Out-of-Band Server-Side Request Forgery (OOB SSRF) Vulnerability

OpenEMR is a free and open source electronic health records and medical practice management application. An Out-of-Band Server-Side Request Forgery (OOB SSRF) vulnerability was identified in OpenEMR, allowing an attacker to force the server to make unauthorized requests to external or internal resources. this attack does not return a direct response but can be exploited through DNS or HTTP interactions to exfiltrate sensitive information. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.0.3.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenEMR Foundation, Inc
Product-openemropenemr
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-21642
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.71% / 49.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Jan, 2024 | 21:11
Updated-17 Jun, 2025 | 20:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
D-Tale server-side request forgery through Web uploads

D-Tale is a visualizer for Pandas data structures. Users hosting versions D-Tale prior to 3.9.0 publicly can be vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF), allowing attackers to access files on the server. Users should upgrade to version 3.9.0, where the `Load From the Web` input is turned off by default. The only workaround for versions earlier than 3.9.0 is to only host D-Tale to trusted users.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-manman-group
Product-d-taledtale
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-64799
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Joomla! Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Joomla! Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 7.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jul, 2026 | 09:11
Updated-28 Jul, 2026 | 05:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - SSRF via remote image downloads in Articles Anywhere and Users Anywhere extensions

Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - SSRF via remote image downloads in Articles Anywhere and Users Anywhere extensions - Content-controlled image URLs could request private or reserved network services, follow unsafe redirects and save responses without validating that they were images. This could result in SSRF, internal-data access or writing attacker-controlled files into a web-accessible folder.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-regularlabs.com
Product-Articles Anywhere Pro extension for JoomlaUsers Anywhere Pro extension for Joomla
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2026-53754
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.27% / 18.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jun, 2026 | 18:16
Updated-29 Jun, 2026 | 16:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Crawl4AI: SSRF filter bypass in Docker server via IPv6 transition forms (NAT64 / 6to4 / unspecified / v4-mapped)

Crawl4AI is an open-source LLM friendly web crawler & scraper. Prior to 0.8.8, the Docker API server's SSRF protection (validate_webhook_url / validate_url_destination in deploy/docker/utils.py) used an explicit IPv4/IPv6 CIDR blocklist that missed several address families. An attacker could reach internal services and cloud metadata endpoints (e.g. 169.254.169.254) despite the filter by encoding an internal IPv4 address inside an IPv6 transition form, or by using the IPv6 unspecified address. Because the Docker API is unauthenticated by default (jwt_enabled: false), no credentials are required. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.8.8.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-kidocodeunclecode
Product-crawl4aicrawl4ai
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2025-27817
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-64.68% / 99.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jun, 2025 | 07:55
Updated-11 Jul, 2025 | 16:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Kafka Client: Arbitrary file read and SSRF vulnerability

A possible arbitrary file read and SSRF vulnerability has been identified in Apache Kafka Client. Apache Kafka Clients accept configuration data for setting the SASL/OAUTHBEARER connection with the brokers, including "sasl.oauthbearer.token.endpoint.url" and "sasl.oauthbearer.jwks.endpoint.url". Apache Kafka allows clients to read an arbitrary file and return the content in the error log, or sending requests to an unintended location. In applications where Apache Kafka Clients configurations can be specified by an untrusted party, attackers may use the "sasl.oauthbearer.token.endpoint.url" and "sasl.oauthbearer.jwks.endpoint.url" configuratin to read arbitrary contents of the disk and environment variables or make requests to an unintended location. In particular, this flaw may be used in Apache Kafka Connect to escalate from REST API access to filesystem/environment/URL access, which may be undesirable in certain environments, including SaaS products. Since Apache Kafka 3.9.1/4.0.0, we have added a system property ("-Dorg.apache.kafka.sasl.oauthbearer.allowed.urls") to set the allowed urls in SASL JAAS configuration. In 3.9.1, it accepts all urls by default for backward compatibility. However in 4.0.0 and newer, the default value is empty list and users have to set the allowed urls explicitly.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-kafkaApache Kafka Client
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next
Details not found