An attacker could send a malicious link to an authenticated operator, which may allow remote attackers to perform actions with the permissions of the user on the Sunny WebBox Firmware Version 1.6 and prior. This device uses IP addresses to maintain communication after a successful login, which would increase the ease of exploitation.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in kopatheme Nictitate.This issue affects Nictitate: from n/a through 1.1.4.
The Business Directory Plugin – Easy Listing Directories for WordPress WordPress plugin before 5.11.1 suffered from Cross-Site Request Forgery issues, allowing an attacker to make a logged in administrator add, edit or delete form fields, which could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alexander Fuchs PHP Everywhere plugin <= 2.0.2 versions.
The Shantz WordPress QOTD WordPress plugin through 1.2.2 is lacking any CSRF check when updating its settings, allowing attackers to make logged in administrators change them to arbitrary values.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in All In One WP Security & Firewall Team All In One WP Security & Firewall.This issue affects All In One WP Security & Firewall: from n/a through 5.2.6.
In the Reponsive Menu (free and Pro) WordPress plugins before 4.0.4, attackers could craft a request and trick an administrator into uploading a zip archive containing malicious PHP files. The attacker could then access those files to achieve remote code execution and further infect the targeted site.
The fitness calculators WordPress plugin before 1.9.6 add calculators for Water intake, BMI calculator, protein Intake, and Body Fat and was lacking CSRF check, allowing attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions, such as change the calculator headers. Due to the lack of sanitisation, this could also lead to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue
A vulnerability in the web-based interface allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger actions on an affected system on behalf of another user (CSRF - Cross Site Request Forgery). This requires the victim to be tricked into clicking a malicious link or opening a malicious website while being logged in into the camera.
NETGEAR Nighthawk WiFi6 Router prior to V1.0.10.94 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery attacks on all endpoints due to improperly implemented CSRF protections.
The package joplin before 2.3.2 are vulnerable to Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) due to missing CSRF checks in various forms.
Due to the lack of sanitization and lack of nonce protection on the custom CSS feature, an attacker could craft a request to inject malicious JavaScript on a site using the Contact Form 7 Style WordPress plugin through 3.1.9. If an attacker successfully tricked a site’s administrator into clicking a link or attachment, then the request could be sent and the CSS settings would be successfully updated to include malicious JavaScript.
In OSIsoft PI Web API and prior, the affected product is vulnerable to a direct attack due to a cross-site request forgery protection setting that has not taken effect.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository froxlor/froxlor prior to 2.0.11.
The Business Directory Plugin – Easy Listing Directories for WordPress WordPress plugin before 5.11 suffered from a Cross-Site Request Forgery issue, allowing an attacker to make a logged in administrator import files. As the plugin also did not validate uploaded files, it could lead to RCE.
Lack of CSRF checks in the ActiveCampaign WordPress plugin, versions before 8.0.2, on its Settings form, which could allow attacker to make a logged-in administrator change API Credentials to attacker's account.
The Newsletter Popup WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks as the wp_newsletter_show_localrecord page is not protected with a nonce.
The wp_ajax_save_fbe_settings and wp_ajax_delete_fbe_settings AJAX actions of the Facebook for WordPress plugin before 3.0.4 were vulnerable to CSRF due to a lack of nonce protection. The settings in the saveFbeSettings function had no sanitization allowing for script tags to be saved.
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in SourceCodester Online Pizza Ordering System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file admin/ajax.php?action=save_user. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-221681 was assigned to this vulnerability.
The User Role by BestWebSoft WordPress plugin before 1.6.7 does not protect against CSRF in requests to update role capabilities, leading to arbitrary privilege escalation of any role.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in realmag777 WordPress Meta Data and Taxonomies Filter (MDTF).This issue affects WordPress Meta Data and Taxonomies Filter (MDTF): from n/a through 1.3.3.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Easy Digital Downloads.This issue affects Easy Digital Downloads: from n/a through 3.2.11.
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.2.1, URL injection leading to CSRF was possible.
The SVS Pricing Tables plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the deletePricingTable() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete pricing tables via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A CVE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists that could allow an attacker to impersonate the user or carry out actions on their behalf when crafted malicious parameters are submitted in POST requests sent to the charging station web server. Affected Products: EVlink City EVC1S22P4 / EVC1S7P4 (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2 ), EVlink Parking EVW2 / EVF2 / EVP2PE (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2), and EVlink Smart Wallbox EVB1A (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2)
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all previous versions. If the victim is an admin, it was possible to issue a CSRF in System hooks through the API.
The WP 2FA – Two-factor authentication for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the send_backup_codes_email function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send emails with arbitrary content to registered users via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator or other registered user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. While a nonce check is present, it is only executed if a nonce is set. By omitting a nonce from the request, the check can be bypassed.
Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware 5.2 has CSRF
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themeisle Multiple Page Generator Plugin – MPG.This issue affects Multiple Page Generator Plugin – MPG: from n/a through 3.4.0.
An issue was discovered in Verint Impact 360 15.1. At wfo/control/signin, the login form can accept submissions from external websites. In conjunction with CVE-2019-12783, this can be used by attackers to "crowdsource" bruteforce login attempts on the target site, allowing them to guess and potentially compromise valid credentials without ever sending any traffic from their own machine to the target site.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Fetch Designs Sign-up Sheets.This issue affects Sign-up Sheets: from n/a through 2.2.11.1.
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Tianjin PubliCMS 4.0.202302.e. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Metagauss RegistrationMagic.This issue affects RegistrationMagic: from n/a through 5.3.0.0.
The Clock In Portal- Staff & Attendance Management WordPress plugin through 2.1 does not have CSRF check when deleting Holidays, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary holidays via a CSRF attack
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Concrete CMS <v9 that could allow an attacker to make requests on behalf of other users.
The Coupon Zen WordPress plugin before 1.0.6 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins promoted builds Plugin 3.9 and earlier allows attackers to to promote builds.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pixelpost 1.7.3 could allow remote attackers to change the admin password.
A spoofing vulnerability exists in Microsoft SharePoint when it improperly handles requests to authorize applications, resulting in cross-site request forgery (CSRF).To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to create a page specifically designed to cause a cross-site request, aka 'Microsoft SharePoint Spoofing Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1261.
The WP Plugin Manager WordPress plugin before 1.1.8 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack
The WC Sales Notification WordPress plugin before 1.2.3 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack
The Clock In Portal- Staff & Attendance Management WordPress plugin through 2.1 does not have CSRF check when deleting designations, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary designations via a CSRF attack
BIG-IP version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.3, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.2, 13.1.x before 13.1.4.1, and all versions of 12.1.x and 11.6.x and all versions of BIG-IQ 8.x, 7.x, and 6.x are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks through iControl SOAP. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are affected by a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the GraphQL API. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized modification of customer metadata by an unauthenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is not required for successful exploitation.
MK-AUTH through 19.01 K4.9 allows CSRF for password changes via the central/executar_central.php?acao=altsenha_princ URI.
The Clock In Portal- Staff & Attendance Management WordPress plugin through 2.1 does not have CSRF check when deleting Staff members, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary Staff via a CSRF attack
Jenkins SAML Plugin 2.0.7 and earlier allows attackers to craft URLs that would bypass the CSRF protection of any target URL in Jenkins.
The tagDiv Cloud Library WordPress plugin before 2.7 does not have authorisation and CSRF in an AJAX action accessible to both unauthenticated and authenticated users, allowing unauthenticated users to change arbitrary user metadata, which could lead to privilege escalation by setting themselves as an admin of the blog.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Configuration Slicing Plugin 1.51 and earlier allows attackers to apply different slice configurations.
The WP Meta SEO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 4.5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the regenerateSitemaps function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to regenerate Sitemaps via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.