Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2023-36840

Summary
Assigner-juniper
Assigner Org ID-8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968
Published At-14 Jul, 2023 | 17:43
Updated At-22 Oct, 2024 | 14:19
Rejected At-
Credits

Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: An rpd crash occurs when a specific L2VPN command is run

A Reachable Assertion vulnerability in Routing Protocol Daemon (RPD) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a locally-based, low-privileged attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). On all Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, when a specific L2VPN command is run, RPD will crash and restart. Continued execution of this specific command will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS All versions prior to 19.3R3-S10; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S4; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S6; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S6; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S5; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S2; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R2; 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2; Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved All versions prior to 20.4R3-S7-EVO; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S3-EVO; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S5-EVO; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S4-EVO; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-EVO; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-EVO; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R2-EVO; 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2-EVO;

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:juniper
Assigner Org ID:8cbe9d5a-a066-4c94-8978-4b15efeae968
Published At:14 Jul, 2023 | 17:43
Updated At:22 Oct, 2024 | 14:19
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: An rpd crash occurs when a specific L2VPN command is run

A Reachable Assertion vulnerability in Routing Protocol Daemon (RPD) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a locally-based, low-privileged attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). On all Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, when a specific L2VPN command is run, RPD will crash and restart. Continued execution of this specific command will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS All versions prior to 19.3R3-S10; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S4; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S6; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S6; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S5; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S2; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R2; 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2; Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved All versions prior to 20.4R3-S7-EVO; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S3-EVO; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S5-EVO; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S4-EVO; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-EVO; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-EVO; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R2-EVO; 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2-EVO;

Affected Products
Vendor
Juniper Networks, Inc.Juniper Networks
Product
Junos OS
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From unspecified before 19.3R3-S10 (custom)
  • From 20.1 before 20.1R3-S4 (custom)
  • From 20.2 before 20.2R3-S6 (custom)
  • From 20.3 before 20.3R3-S6 (custom)
  • From 20.4 before 20.4R3-S5 (custom)
  • From 21.1 before 21.1R3-S4 (custom)
  • From 21.2 before 21.2R3-S3 (custom)
  • From 21.3 before 21.3R3-S2 (custom)
  • From 21.4 before 21.4R3 (custom)
  • From 22.1 before 22.1R3 (custom)
  • From 22.2 before 22.2R2 (custom)
  • From 22.3 before 22.3R2 (custom)
Vendor
Juniper Networks, Inc.Juniper Networks
Product
Junos OS Evolved
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From unspecified before 20.4R3-S7-EVO (custom)
  • From 21.1 before 21.1R3-S3-EVO (custom)
  • From 21.2 before 21.2R3-S5-EVO (custom)
  • From 21.3 before 21.3R3-S4-EVO (custom)
  • From 21.4 before 21.4R3-EVO (custom)
  • From 22.1 before 22.1R3-EVO (custom)
  • From 22.2 before 22.2R2-EVO (custom)
  • From 22.3 before 22.3R2-EVO (custom)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-617CWE-617 Reachable Assertion
N/AN/ADenial of Service (DoS)
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-617
Description: CWE-617 Reachable Assertion
Type: N/A
CWE ID: N/A
Description: Denial of Service (DoS)
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.15.5MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.5
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: Junos OS: 19.3R3-S7, 19.4R3-S10, 20.2R3-S6, 20.4R3-S5, 21.1R3-S4, 21.2R3-S3, 21.3R3-S2, 21.4R3, 22.1R3, 22.2R2, 22.3R2, 22.4R1, and all subsequent releases; Junos OS Evolved: 20.4R3-S7-EVO, 21.4R3-EVO, 22.1R3-EVO, 22.2R2-EVO, 22.3R2-EVO, 22.4R1-EVO, and all subsequent releases.

Configurations

Workarounds

This issue can be avoided by using access lists or firewall filters to limit access to the device to only trusted hosts, networks and administrators.

Exploits

Juniper SIRT is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability.

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA71647
N/A
Hyperlink: https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA71647
Resource: N/A
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA71647
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA71647
Resource:
x_transferred
2. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:sirt@juniper.net
Published At:14 Jul, 2023 | 18:15
Updated At:27 Jul, 2023 | 14:32

A Reachable Assertion vulnerability in Routing Protocol Daemon (RPD) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a locally-based, low-privileged attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). On all Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, when a specific L2VPN command is run, RPD will crash and restart. Continued execution of this specific command will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS All versions prior to 19.3R3-S10; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S4; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S6; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S6; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S5; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S2; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R2; 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2; Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved All versions prior to 20.4R3-S7-EVO; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S3-EVO; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S5-EVO; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S4-EVO; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-EVO; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-EVO; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R2-EVO; 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2-EVO;

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.5MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.5
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CPE Matches

Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>Versions before 19.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r1:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r1-s1:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r2:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r2-s1:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r2-s2:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r2-s3:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r2-s4:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r2-s5:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r2-s6:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r2-s7:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r3:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r3-s1:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r3-s2:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r3-s3:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r3-s4:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r3-s5:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.3
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.3:r3-s6:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r1:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r1-s1:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r1-s2:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r1-s3:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r1-s4:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r2:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r2-s1:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r2-s2:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r2-s3:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r2-s4:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r2-s5:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r2-s6:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r2-s7:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r3:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r3-s1:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r3-s2:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r3-s3:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r3-s4:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r3-s5:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r3-s6:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r3-s7:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r3-s8:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>19.4
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:19.4:r3-s9:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>20.1
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:20.1:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>20.1
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:20.1:r1:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>20.1
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:20.1:r1-s1:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>20.1
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:20.1:r1-s2:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>20.1
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:20.1:r1-s3:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>20.1
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:20.1:r1-s4:*:*:*:*:*:*
Juniper Networks, Inc.
juniper
>>junos>>20.1
cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos:20.1:r2:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-617Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE-617Secondarysirt@juniper.net
CWE ID: CWE-617
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-617
Type: Secondary
Source: sirt@juniper.net
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA71647sirt@juniper.net
Mitigation
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA71647
Source: sirt@juniper.net
Resource:
Mitigation
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

74Records found

CVE-2024-42252
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.04% / 11.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Aug, 2024 | 08:46
Updated-04 May, 2025 | 09:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
closures: Change BUG_ON() to WARN_ON()

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: closures: Change BUG_ON() to WARN_ON() If a BUG_ON() can be hit in the wild, it shouldn't be a BUG_ON() For reference, this has popped up once in the CI, and we'll need more info to debug it: 03240 ------------[ cut here ]------------ 03240 kernel BUG at lib/closure.c:21! 03240 kernel BUG at lib/closure.c:21! 03240 Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP 03240 Modules linked in: 03240 CPU: 15 PID: 40534 Comm: kworker/u80:1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc4-ktest-ga56da69799bd #25570 03240 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) 03240 Workqueue: btree_update btree_interior_update_work 03240 pstate: 00001005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT +SSBS BTYPE=--) 03240 pc : closure_put+0x224/0x2a0 03240 lr : closure_put+0x24/0x2a0 03240 sp : ffff0000d12071c0 03240 x29: ffff0000d12071c0 x28: dfff800000000000 x27: ffff0000d1207360 03240 x26: 0000000000000040 x25: 0000000000000040 x24: 0000000000000040 03240 x23: ffff0000c1f20180 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffff0000c1f20168 03240 x20: 0000000040000000 x19: ffff0000c1f20140 x18: 0000000000000001 03240 x17: 0000000000003aa0 x16: 0000000000003ad0 x15: 1fffe0001c326974 03240 x14: 0000000000000a1e x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 1fffe000183e402d 03240 x11: ffff6000183e402d x10: dfff800000000000 x9 : ffff6000183e402e 03240 x8 : 0000000000000001 x7 : 00009fffe7c1bfd3 x6 : ffff0000c1f2016b 03240 x5 : ffff0000c1f20168 x4 : ffff6000183e402e x3 : ffff800081391954 03240 x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 00000000a8000000 03240 Call trace: 03240 closure_put+0x224/0x2a0 03240 bch2_check_for_deadlock+0x910/0x1028 03240 bch2_six_check_for_deadlock+0x1c/0x30 03240 six_lock_slowpath.isra.0+0x29c/0xed0 03240 six_lock_ip_waiter+0xa8/0xf8 03240 __bch2_btree_node_lock_write+0x14c/0x298 03240 bch2_trans_lock_write+0x6d4/0xb10 03240 __bch2_trans_commit+0x135c/0x5520 03240 btree_interior_update_work+0x1248/0x1c10 03240 process_scheduled_works+0x53c/0xd90 03240 worker_thread+0x370/0x8c8 03240 kthread+0x258/0x2e8 03240 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 03240 Code: aa1303e0 d63f0020 a94363f7 17ffff8c (d4210000) 03240 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- 03240 Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception 03240 SMP: stopping secondary CPUs 03241 SMP: failed to stop secondary CPUs 13,15 03241 Kernel Offset: disabled 03241 CPU features: 0x00,00000003,80000008,4240500b 03241 Memory Limit: none 03241 ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops - BUG: Fatal exception ]--- 03246 ========= FAILED TIMEOUT copygc_torture_no_checksum in 7200s

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Linux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelLinux
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2023-52569
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Mar, 2024 | 21:59
Updated-19 Jun, 2025 | 13:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item Instead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index item into the delayed node's tree, we can just release all the resources we have allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This is fine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done before calling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pending snapshots in the transaction commit path). So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling. This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it because it only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehow we attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Linux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelLinux
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2023-38472
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Nov, 2023 | 14:59
Updated-29 Aug, 2024 | 14:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Reachable assertion in avahi_rdata_parse

A vulnerability was found in Avahi. A reachable assertion exists in the avahi_rdata_parse() function.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-avahin/aRed Hat, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-enterprise_linuxavahiRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8avahiRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Fedora
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2023-38469
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Nov, 2023 | 14:49
Updated-29 Aug, 2024 | 14:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Reachable assertion in avahi_dns_packet_append_record

A vulnerability was found in Avahi, where a reachable assertion exists in avahi_dns_packet_append_record.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-avahin/aRed Hat, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-enterprise_linuxavahiRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8avahiRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Fedora
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2024-8354
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Sep, 2024 | 10:45
Updated-06 Aug, 2025 | 07:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Qemu-kvm: usb: assertion failure in usb_ep_get()

A flaw was found in QEMU. An assertion failure was present in the usb_ep_get() function in hw/net/core.c when trying to get the USB endpoint from a USB device. This flaw may allow a malicious unprivileged guest user to crash the QEMU process on the host and cause a denial of service condition.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-QEMURed Hat, Inc.
Product-qemuenterprise_linuxRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Advanced VirtualizationRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2023-28856
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 32.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Apr, 2023 | 20:50
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 16:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
`HINCRBYFLOAT` can be used to crash a redis-server process

Redis is an open source, in-memory database that persists on disk. Authenticated users can use the `HINCRBYFLOAT` command to create an invalid hash field that will crash Redis on access in affected versions. This issue has been addressed in in versions 7.0.11, 6.2.12, and 6.0.19. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxFedora ProjectRedis Inc.
Product-redisdebian_linuxfedoraredis
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2023-28425
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-27.37% / 96.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Mar, 2023 | 19:03
Updated-25 Feb, 2025 | 14:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Specially crafted MSETNX command can lead to denial-of-service

Redis is an in-memory database that persists on disk. Starting in version 7.0.8 and prior to version 7.0.10, authenticated users can use the MSETNX command to trigger a runtime assertion and termination of the Redis server process. The problem is fixed in Redis version 7.0.10.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Redis Inc.
Product-redisredis
CWE ID-CWE-77
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2025-47229
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-2.9||LOW
EPSS-0.02% / 2.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 May, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-18 Jul, 2025 | 15:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libpspp-core.a in GNU PSPP through 2.0.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (var_set_leave_quiet assertion failure and application exit) via crafted input data, such as data that triggers a call from src/data/dictionary.c code into src/data/variable.c code.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GNU
Product-psppPSPP
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2015-8745
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Dec, 2016 | 22:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

QEMU (aka Quick Emulator) built with a VMWARE VMXNET3 paravirtual NIC emulator support is vulnerable to crash issue. It could occur while reading Interrupt Mask Registers (IMR). A privileged (CAP_SYS_RAWIO) guest user could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process instance resulting in DoS.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aQEMUDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxqemun/a
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2022-29213
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 25.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 May, 2022 | 23:30
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 17:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incomplete validation in signal ops leads to crashes in TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source platform for machine learning. Prior to versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4, the `tf.compat.v1.signal.rfft2d` and `tf.compat.v1.signal.rfft3d` lack input validation and under certain condition can result in crashes (due to `CHECK`-failures). Versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4 contain a patch for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Google LLCTensorFlow
Product-tensorflowtensorflow
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2025-30034
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 1.31%
||
7 Day CHG-0.00%
Published-12 Aug, 2025 | 11:16
Updated-20 Aug, 2025 | 20:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (All versions < V3.3). Affected devices do not properly validate input sent to its listening port on the local loopback interface. This could allow an unauthenticated local attacker to cause a denial of service condition.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-simatic_rtls_locating_managerSIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2024-26726
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2024 | 14:55
Updated-10 Jul, 2025 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
btrfs: don't drop extent_map for free space inode on write error

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't drop extent_map for free space inode on write error While running the CI for an unrelated change I hit the following panic with generic/648 on btrfs_holes_spacecache. assertion failed: block_start != EXTENT_MAP_HOLE, in fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 2695096 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc2+ #1 RIP: 0010:__extent_writepage_io.constprop.0+0x4c1/0x5c0 Call Trace: <TASK> extent_write_cache_pages+0x2ac/0x8f0 extent_writepages+0x87/0x110 do_writepages+0xd5/0x1f0 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x63/0x90 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x5c/0x80 btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1f/0x50 btrfs_write_out_cache+0x507/0x560 btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x32a/0x420 commit_cowonly_roots+0x21b/0x290 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x813/0x1360 btrfs_sync_file+0x51a/0x640 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x52/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x9c/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 This happens because we fail to write out the free space cache in one instance, come back around and attempt to write it again. However on the second pass through we go to call btrfs_get_extent() on the inode to get the extent mapping. Because this is a new block group, and with the free space inode we always search the commit root to avoid deadlocking with the tree, we find nothing and return a EXTENT_MAP_HOLE for the requested range. This happens because the first time we try to write the space cache out we hit an error, and on an error we drop the extent mapping. This is normal for normal files, but the free space cache inode is special. We always expect the extent map to be correct. Thus the second time through we end up with a bogus extent map. Since we're deprecating this feature, the most straightforward way to fix this is to simply skip dropping the extent map range for this failed range. I shortened the test by using error injection to stress the area to make it easier to reproduce. With this patch in place we no longer panic with my error injection test.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Linux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelLinux
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2022-25675
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Qualcomm, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Qualcomm, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 24.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Dec, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Denial of service due to reachable assertion in modem while processing filter rule from application client in Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Product-wcd9380_firmwarewcd9340_firmwareqca6310sd690_5gsd765_firmwaresd765gwsa8835sdx55msd855_firmwarewcn3998wcn6850_firmwareqcs6490sdx55wsa8810_firmwarewsa8815_firmwarewcn3991_firmwarewcn6740wcd9385sdx65wcd9385_firmwarewcn6750_firmwarewsa8810wcd9341_firmwarewsa8830sd888_5gsd768gwcn6740_firmwarewcn6856wsa8815qca6390aqt1000_firmwarewsa8835_firmwarewcd9335_firmwaresd480qca6430sm7250p_firmwaresd855qca6391qcs6490_firmwarewcn3991wcn3998_firmwarewcd9340wcn6850wcn6851sdx55_firmwaresd778g_firmwarewcd9370_firmwareqca6320_firmwareqca6420_firmwareqcm6490qcx315sd888_5g_firmwarewcd9335wsa8830_firmwareqca6320sd835sd765g_firmwaresd865_5g_firmwarewcd9341wcn6851_firmwaresd835_firmwarewcn6750sm7325pqca6391_firmwaresm7250psd695_firmwarewcd9380sd695sd480_firmwarewcd9375qca6430_firmwarewcd9375_firmwaresd865_5gsm7325p_firmwaresd780gwcn6856_firmwaresd870sdx55m_firmwaresd690_5g_firmwareaqt1000sd778gwcn3988wcn3990_firmwareqca6390_firmwarewcn6855_firmwaresd765sd768g_firmwareqca6420sd780g_firmwarewcn6855qcx315_firmwarewcn3988_firmwaresdx65_firmwareqca6310_firmwaresd870_firmwareqcm6490_firmwarewcd9370wcn3990Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2020-3958
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 27.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 May, 2020 | 19:42
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 07:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

VMware ESXi (6.7 before ESXi670-202004101-SG and 6.5 before ESXi650-202005401-SG), VMware Workstation (15.x before 15.5.2) and VMware Fusion (11.x before 11.5.2) contain a denial-of-service vulnerability in the shader functionality. Successful exploitation of this issue may allow attackers with non-administrative access to a virtual machine to crash the virtual machine's vmx process leading to a denial of service condition.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-VMware (Broadcom Inc.)
Product-workstationesxifusionVMware WorkstationVMware ESXiVMware Fusion
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2021-47351
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.02% / 4.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 May, 2024 | 14:35
Updated-12 May, 2025 | 19:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ubifs: Fix races between xattr_{set|get} and listxattr operations

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ubifs: Fix races between xattr_{set|get} and listxattr operations UBIFS may occur some problems with concurrent xattr_{set|get} and listxattr operations, such as assertion failure, memory corruption, stale xattr value[1]. Fix it by importing a new rw-lock in @ubifs_inode to serilize write operations on xattr, concurrent read operations are still effective, just like ext4. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200630130438.141649-1-houtao1@huawei.com

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Linux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelLinux
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CWE ID-CWE-787
Out-of-bounds Write
CVE-2021-46666
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Feb, 2022 | 01:47
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 05:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

MariaDB before 10.6.2 allows an application crash because of mishandling of a pushdown from a HAVING clause to a WHERE clause.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMariaDB Foundation
Product-mariadbn/a
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2021-47305
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.00% / 0.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 May, 2024 | 14:35
Updated-12 May, 2025 | 20:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
dma-buf/sync_file: Don't leak fences on merge failure

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dma-buf/sync_file: Don't leak fences on merge failure Each add_fence() call does a dma_fence_get() on the relevant fence. In the error path, we weren't calling dma_fence_put() so all those fences got leaked. Also, in the krealloc_array failure case, we weren't freeing the fences array. Instead, ensure that i and fences are always zero-initialized and dma_fence_put() all the fences and kfree(fences) on every error path.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Linux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelLinux
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2023-38473
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Nov, 2023 | 15:00
Updated-29 Aug, 2024 | 14:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Reachable assertion in avahi_alternative_host_name

A vulnerability was found in Avahi. A reachable assertion exists in the avahi_alternative_host_name() function.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-avahin/aRed Hat, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-enterprise_linuxavahiRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8avahiRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Fedora
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2023-38471
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Nov, 2023 | 14:58
Updated-29 Aug, 2024 | 14:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Reachable assertion in dbus_set_host_name

A vulnerability was found in Avahi. A reachable assertion exists in the dbus_set_host_name function.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-avahin/aRed Hat, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-enterprise_linuxavahiRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8avahiRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Fedora
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2023-38470
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Nov, 2023 | 14:57
Updated-29 Aug, 2024 | 14:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Reachable assertion in avahi_escape_label

A vulnerability was found in Avahi. A reachable assertion exists in the avahi_escape_label() function.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-avahin/aRed Hat, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-enterprise_linuxavahiRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8avahiRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Fedora
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2021-47315
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.00% / 0.16%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-21 May, 2024 | 14:35
Updated-12 May, 2025 | 20:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
memory: fsl_ifc: fix leak of IO mapping on probe failure

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memory: fsl_ifc: fix leak of IO mapping on probe failure On probe error the driver should unmap the IO memory. Smatch reports: drivers/memory/fsl_ifc.c:298 fsl_ifc_ctrl_probe() warn: 'fsl_ifc_ctrl_dev->gregs' not released on lines: 298.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Linux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelLinux
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2024-49932
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.02% / 3.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Oct, 2024 | 18:01
Updated-04 May, 2025 | 09:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't readahead the relocation inode on RST On relocation we're doing readahead on the relocation inode, but if the filesystem is backed by a RAID stripe tree we can get ENOENT (e.g. due to preallocated extents not being mapped in the RST) from the lookup. But readahead doesn't handle the error and submits invalid reads to the device, causing an assertion in the scatter-gather list code: BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): balance: start -d -m -s BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): relocating block group 6480920576 flags data|raid0 BTRFS error (device nvme1n1): cannot find raid-stripe for logical [6481928192, 6481969152] devid 2, profile raid0 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:115! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 1012 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #567 RIP: 0010:__blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001a43820 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffea00045d4802 RDX: 0000000117520000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881027d1000 RBP: 0000000000003000 R08: ffffea00045d4902 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff8881003d10b8 R13: ffffc90001a438f0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000003000 FS: 00007fcc048a6900(0000) GS:ffff88813bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000002cd11000 CR3: 00000001109ea001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x14/0x25 ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 ? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80 ? __blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 ? __blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? __blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0 nvme_prep_rq.part.0+0x9d/0x770 nvme_queue_rq+0x7d/0x1e0 __blk_mq_issue_directly+0x2a/0x90 ? blk_mq_get_budget_and_tag+0x61/0x90 blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly+0x56/0xf0 blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0x52b/0x5d0 __blk_flush_plug+0xc6/0x110 blk_finish_plug+0x28/0x40 read_pages+0x160/0x1c0 page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x109/0x180 relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x611/0x6a0 ? btrfs_search_slot+0xba4/0xd20 ? balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags+0x26/0xb00 relocate_data_extent.constprop.0+0x134/0x160 relocate_block_group+0x3f2/0x500 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x250/0x430 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x3f/0x130 btrfs_balance+0x71b/0xef0 ? kmalloc_trace_noprof+0x13b/0x280 btrfs_ioctl+0x2c2e/0x3030 ? kvfree_call_rcu+0x1e6/0x340 ? list_lru_add_obj+0x66/0x80 ? mntput_no_expire+0x3a/0x220 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x96/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x54/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7fcc04514f9b Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7fcc04514f71. RSP: 002b:00007ffeba923370 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fcc04514f9b RDX: 00007ffeba923460 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000013 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 00007fcc043fbba8 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffeba924fc5 R13: 00007ffeba923460 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 00000000004d4bb0 </TASK> Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- RIP: 0010:__blk_rq_map_sg+0x339/0x4a0 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001a43820 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffea00045d4802 RDX: 0000000117520000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881027d1000 RBP: 0000000000003000 R08: ffffea00045d4902 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff8881003d10b8 R13: ffffc90001a438f0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000003000 FS: 00007fcc048a6900(0000) GS:ffff88813bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fcc04514f71 CR3: 00000001109ea001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0 Kernel p ---truncated---

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Linux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelLinux
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2024-42251
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-kernel.org
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.02% / 4.10%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Aug, 2024 | 08:46
Updated-04 May, 2025 | 09:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
mm: page_ref: remove folio_try_get_rcu()

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: page_ref: remove folio_try_get_rcu() The below bug was reported on a non-SMP kernel: [ 275.267158][ T4335] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 275.267949][ T4335] kernel BUG at include/linux/page_ref.h:275! [ 275.268526][ T4335] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] KASAN PTI [ 275.269001][ T4335] CPU: 0 PID: 4335 Comm: trinity-c3 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-00061-gefa7df3e3bb5 #1 [ 275.269787][ T4335] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [ 275.270679][ T4335] RIP: 0010:try_get_folio (include/linux/page_ref.h:275 (discriminator 3) mm/gup.c:79 (discriminator 3)) [ 275.272813][ T4335] RSP: 0018:ffffc90005dcf650 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 275.273346][ T4335] RAX: 0000000000000246 RBX: ffffea00066e0000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 275.274032][ T4335] RDX: fffff94000cdc007 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffea00066e0034 [ 275.274719][ T4335] RBP: ffffea00066e0000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffff94000cdc006 [ 275.275404][ T4335] R10: ffffea00066e0037 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000136 [ 275.276106][ T4335] R13: ffffea00066e0034 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffffea00066e0008 [ 275.276790][ T4335] FS: 00007fa2f9b61740(0000) GS:ffffffff89d0d000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 275.277570][ T4335] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 275.278143][ T4335] CR2: 00007fa2f6c00000 CR3: 0000000134b04000 CR4: 00000000000406f0 [ 275.278833][ T4335] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 275.279521][ T4335] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 275.280201][ T4335] Call Trace: [ 275.280499][ T4335] <TASK> [ 275.280751][ T4335] ? die (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:421 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:434 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:447) [ 275.281087][ T4335] ? do_trap (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:112 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:153) [ 275.281463][ T4335] ? try_get_folio (include/linux/page_ref.h:275 (discriminator 3) mm/gup.c:79 (discriminator 3)) [ 275.281884][ T4335] ? try_get_folio (include/linux/page_ref.h:275 (discriminator 3) mm/gup.c:79 (discriminator 3)) [ 275.282300][ T4335] ? do_error_trap (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:174) [ 275.282711][ T4335] ? try_get_folio (include/linux/page_ref.h:275 (discriminator 3) mm/gup.c:79 (discriminator 3)) [ 275.283129][ T4335] ? handle_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:212) [ 275.283561][ T4335] ? try_get_folio (include/linux/page_ref.h:275 (discriminator 3) mm/gup.c:79 (discriminator 3)) [ 275.283990][ T4335] ? exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:264) [ 275.284415][ T4335] ? asm_exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:568) [ 275.284859][ T4335] ? try_get_folio (include/linux/page_ref.h:275 (discriminator 3) mm/gup.c:79 (discriminator 3)) [ 275.285278][ T4335] try_grab_folio (mm/gup.c:148) [ 275.285684][ T4335] __get_user_pages (mm/gup.c:1297 (discriminator 1)) [ 275.286111][ T4335] ? __pfx___get_user_pages (mm/gup.c:1188) [ 275.286579][ T4335] ? __pfx_validate_chain (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3825) [ 275.287034][ T4335] ? mark_lock (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4656 (discriminator 1)) [ 275.287416][ T4335] __gup_longterm_locked (mm/gup.c:1509 mm/gup.c:2209) [ 275.288192][ T4335] ? __pfx___gup_longterm_locked (mm/gup.c:2204) [ 275.288697][ T4335] ? __pfx_lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5722) [ 275.289135][ T4335] ? __pfx___might_resched (kernel/sched/core.c:10106) [ 275.289595][ T4335] pin_user_pages_remote (mm/gup.c:3350) [ 275.290041][ T4335] ? __pfx_pin_user_pages_remote (mm/gup.c:3350) [ 275.290545][ T4335] ? find_held_lock (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5244 (discriminator 1)) [ 275.290961][ T4335] ? mm_access (kernel/fork.c:1573) [ 275.291353][ T4335] process_vm_rw_single_vec+0x142/0x360 [ 275.291900][ T4335] ? __pfx_process_vm_rw_single_vec+0x10/0x10 [ 275.292471][ T4335] ? mm_access (kernel/fork.c:1573) [ 275.292859][ T4335] process_vm_rw_core+0x272/0x4e0 [ 275.293384][ T4335] ? hlock_class (a ---truncated---

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Linux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelLinux
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CVE-2021-29552
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-2.5||LOW
EPSS-0.01% / 1.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 May, 2021 | 19:10
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
CHECK-failure in `UnsortedSegmentJoin`

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. An attacker can cause a denial of service by controlling the values of `num_segments` tensor argument for `UnsortedSegmentJoin`. This is because the implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/a2a607db15c7cd01d754d37e5448d72a13491bdb/tensorflow/core/kernels/unsorted_segment_join_op.cc#L92-L93) assumes that the `num_segments` tensor is a valid scalar. Since the tensor is empty the `CHECK` involved in `.scalar<T>()()` that checks that the number of elements is exactly 1 will be invalidated and this would result in process termination. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Google LLCTensorFlow
Product-tensorflowtensorflow
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found