The Amministrazione Trasparente plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the at_save_aturl_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in xtemos WoodMart - Multipurpose WooCommerce Theme <= 7.1.1 versions.

The Newsletter – Send awesome emails from WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 9.1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the hook_newsletter_action() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to unsubscribe newsletter subscribers via a forged request granted they can trick a logged-in user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link while having an active session on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user.

A vulnerability was detected in technical-laohu mpay up to 1.2.4. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used.

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects D6200 before 1.1.00.38, D7000 before 1.0.1.78, JR6150 before 1.0.1.24, R6020 before 1.0.0.42, R6050 before 1.0.1.24, R6080 before 1.0.0.42, R6120 before 1.0.0.66, R6220 before 1.1.0.100, R6260 before 1.1.0.64, R6700v2 before 1.2.0.62, R6800 before 1.2.0.62, R6900v2 before 1.2.0.62, R7450 before 1.2.0.62, and WNR2020 before 1.1.0.62.

forma.lms 2.3.0.2 is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in formalms/appCore/index.php?r=lms/profile/show&ap=saveinfo via a GET request to change the admin email address in order to accomplish an account takeover.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in TinyFileManager all version up to and including 2.4.6 that allows attackers to upload files and run OS commands by inducing the Administrator user to browse a URL controlled by an attacker.

An issue was discovered in SmartStoreNET before 4.1.0. Lack of Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection may lead to elevation of privileges (e.g., /admin/customer/create to create an admin account).

The Friendly Functions for Welcart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in EyouCMS v1.6.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a supplying a crafted HTML file to the Upload software format function.

The Alex User Counter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the alex_user_counter_function() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'), Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), : Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine vulnerability in Apache OFBiz. This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.17. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.17, which fixes the issue.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Tran Table of Contents Plus allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Table of Contents Plus: from n/a through 2408.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in katlings pyambic-pentameter. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is 974f21aa1b2527ef39c8afe1a5060548217deca8. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-216498 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

IBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

IBM Watson Studio Local 1.2.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exits in hostel management system 2.1 via the name field in my-profile.php. Chaining to this both vulnerabilities leads to account takeover.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webTareas version 2.4 and earlier allows a remote attacker to create a new administrative profile and add a new user to the new profile. without the victim's knowledge, by enticing an authenticated admin user to visit an attacker's web page.

The WP Plugin Info Card plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ajax_save_custom_plugin() function, which is disabled by prefixing the check with 'false &&'. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create or modify custom plugin entries via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Bidding System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /simple-online-bidding-system/admin/ajax.php?action=save_user. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-264465 was assigned to this vulnerability.

The Widget Bundle WordPress plugin through 2.0.0 does not have CSRF checks when logging Widgets, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin enable/disable widgets via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Henrique Rodrigues SafetyForms allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects SafetyForms: from n/a through 1.0.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP-buy WP Content Copy Protection & No Right Click allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Content Copy Protection & No Right Click: from n/a through 3.5.9.

All versions of @fastify/oauth2 used a statically generated state parameter at startup time and were used across all requests for all users. The purpose of the Oauth2 state parameter is to prevent Cross-Site-Request-Forgery attacks. As such, it should be unique per user and should be connected to the user's session in some way that will allow the server to validate it. v7.2.0 changes the default behavior to store the state in a cookie with the http-only and same-site=lax attributes set. The state is now by default generated for every user. Note that this contains a breaking change in the checkStateFunction function, which now accepts the full Request object.

The Core component of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO iProcess Workspace (Browser) contains a vulnerability that theoretically allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to execute a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack on the affected system. A successful attack using this vulnerability requires human interaction from an authenticated user other than the attacker. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO iProcess Workspace (Browser): versions 11.6.0 and below.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bhaskar Dhote Back Link Tracker allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Back Link Tracker: from n/a through 1.0.0.

snipe-it is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

LogRhythm Platform Manager (PM) 7.4.9 allows CSRF. The Web interface is vulnerable to Cross-site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWH). If a logged-in PM user visits a malicious site in the same browser session, that site can perform a CSRF attack to create a WebSocket from the victim client to the vulnerable PM server. Once the socket is created, the malicious site can interact with the vulnerable web server in the context of the logged-in user. This can include WebSocket payloads that result in command execution.

A vulnerability has been found in Guangdong Pythagorean OA Office System up to 4.50.31 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /note/index/delete. The manipulation of the argument id leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-230458 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Apa Apa Banner Slider allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Apa Banner Slider: from n/a through 1.0.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Infomaniak Staff VOD Infomaniak allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects VOD Infomaniak: from n/a through 1.5.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPWeb Social Auto Poster allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Social Auto Poster: from n/a through 5.3.15.

ECOA BAS controller has a Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability, thus authenticated attacker can remotely place a forged request at a malicious web page and execute CRUD commands (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) to perform arbitrary operations in the system.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WhileTrue Most And Least Read Posts Widget allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Most And Least Read Posts Widget: from n/a through 2.5.18.

Tuleap is a free and open source suite for management of software development and collaboration. Versions of Tuleap Community Edition prior to 17.0.99.1763803709 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions prior to 17.0-4 and 16.13-9 are mission CSRF protections in its tracker field dependencies, allowing attackers to modify tracker fields. This issue is fixed in Tuleap Community Edition version 17.0.99.1763803709 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions 17.0-4 and 16.13-9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Martin Gibson IdeaPush allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects IdeaPush: from n/a through 8.69.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Gora Tech LLC Cooked Pro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Cooked Pro: from n/a before 1.8.0.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Your_account module in CMSphp 0.21 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change an administrator password via the pseudo, pwd, and uid parameters in an admin_info_user_verif action.

IBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MagePeople Team Bus Ticket Booking with Seat Reservation allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Bus Ticket Booking with Seat Reservation: from n/a through 5.4.3.

The Change WP URL plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'change-wp-url' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the WP Login URL via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

calibre-web is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The Login Page Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the devotion_loginform_process() AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's login page settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - Cargo allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Mediawiki - Cargo: from 3.6.X before 3.6.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Razon Komar Pal Linked Variation for WooCommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Linked Variation for WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.0.5.

A security vulnerability has been detected in birkir prime up to 0.4.0.beta.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

icingaweb2-module-jira provides integration with Atlassian Jira. Starting in version 1.3.0 and prior to version 1.3.2, template and field configuration forms perform the deletion action before user input is validated, including the cross site request forgery token. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.2. There are no known workarounds.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Hans Matzen wp-Monalisa allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects wp-Monalisa: from n/a through 6.4.

The ContentMX Content Publisher plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cmx_activate_connection function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bind their own ContentMX connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.