In the Orange Form WordPress plugin through 1.0, the process_bulk_action() function in "admin/orange-form-email.php" performs an unprepared SQL query with an unsanitized parameter ($id). Only admin can access the page that invokes the function, but because of lack of CSRF protection, it is actually exploitable and could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary posts for example
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Metagauss ProfileGrid.This issue affects ProfileGrid : from n/a through 5.7.8.
The WordPress Simple Ecommerce Shopping Cart Plugin- Sell products through Paypal plugin through 2.2.5 does not check for the uploaded Downloadable Digital product file, allowing any file, such as PHP to be uploaded by an administrator. Furthermore, as there is no CSRF in place, attackers could also make a logged admin upload a malicious PHP file, which would lead to RCE
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in aerin Loan Repayment Calculator and Application Form.This issue affects Loan Repayment Calculator and Application Form: from n/a through 2.9.4.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Festi-Team Popup Cart Lite for WooCommerce.This issue affects Popup Cart Lite for WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in realmag777 WOLF – WordPress Posts Bulk Editor and Manager Professional, realmag777 BEAR – Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional for WooCommerce by Pluginus.Net.This issue affects WOLF – WordPress Posts Bulk Editor and Manager Professional: from n/a through 1.0.8.1; BEAR – Bulk Editor and Products Manager Professional for WooCommerce by Pluginus.Net: from n/a through 1.1.4.1.
Deck is a kanban style organization tool aimed at personal planning and project organization for teams integrated with Nextcloud. It is possible to make a user send any POST request with an arbitrary body given they click on a malicious deep link on a Windows computer. (e.g. in an email, chat link, etc). There are currently no known workarounds. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Desktop client is upgraded to 3.6.2.
Missing Authorization, Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Hal Gatewood Dashicons + Custom Post Types.This issue affects Dashicons + Custom Post Types: from n/a through 1.0.2.
In the Reponsive Menu (free and Pro) WordPress plugins before 4.0.4, attackers could craft a request and trick an administrator into uploading a zip archive containing malicious PHP files. The attacker could then access those files to achieve remote code execution and further infect the targeted site.
Due to the lack of sanitization and lack of nonce protection on the custom CSS feature, an attacker could craft a request to inject malicious JavaScript on a site using the Contact Form 7 Style WordPress plugin through 3.1.9. If an attacker successfully tricked a site’s administrator into clicking a link or attachment, then the request could be sent and the CSS settings would be successfully updated to include malicious JavaScript.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Supsystic Coming Soon by Supsystic plugin <= 1.7.10 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LifterLMS.This issue affects LifterLMS: from n/a through 7.5.0.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AppPresser Team AppPresser.This issue affects AppPresser: from n/a through 4.3.0.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AppPresser Team AppPresser.This issue affects AppPresser: from n/a through 4.3.0.
The wp_ajax_nf_oauth_disconnect from the Ninja Forms Contact Form – The Drag and Drop Form Builder for WordPress WordPress plugin before 3.4.34 had no nonce protection making it possible for attackers to craft a request to disconnect a site's OAuth connection.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rafael Dery Superior FAQ plugin <= 1.0.2 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brice CAPOBIANCO Simple Revisions Delete.This issue affects Simple Revisions Delete: from n/a through 1.5.3.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Easy Digital Downloads.This issue affects Easy Digital Downloads: from n/a through 3.2.11.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in conlabzgmbh WP Google Tag Manager plugin <= 1.1 versions.
The Contact Form 7 Captcha WordPress plugin before 0.0.9 does not have any CSRF check in place when saving its settings, allowing attacker to make a logged in user with the manage_options change them. Furthermore, the settings are not escaped when output in attributes, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Hamid Alinia - idehweb Login with phone number.This issue affects Login with phone number: from n/a through 1.6.93.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Catch Plugins Generate Child Theme.This issue affects Generate Child Theme: from n/a through 2.0.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PenciDesign Soledad.This issue affects Soledad: from n/a through 8.4.2.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VeronaLabs WP SMS.This issue affects WP SMS: from n/a through 6.6.2.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in realmag777 HUSKY – Products Filter for WooCommerce (formerly WOOF).This issue affects HUSKY – Products Filter for WooCommerce (formerly WOOF): from n/a through 1.3.5.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jcodex WooCommerce Checkout Field Editor (Checkout Manager).This issue affects WooCommerce Checkout Field Editor (Checkout Manager): from n/a through 2.1.8.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zaytech Smart Online Order for Clover.This issue affects Smart Online Order for Clover: from n/a through 1.5.5.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Nexus Dashboard and Cisco Nexus Dashboard hosted services could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. If the affected user has administrative privileges, these actions could include modifying the system configuration and creating new privileged accounts. Note: There are internal security mechanisms in place that limit the scope of this exploit, reducing the Security Impact Rating of this vulnerability.
The package joplin before 2.3.2 are vulnerable to Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) due to missing CSRF checks in various forms.
In FileCloud before 21.3, file upload is not protected against Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
The Business Directory Plugin – Easy Listing Directories for WordPress WordPress plugin before 5.11 suffered from a Cross-Site Request Forgery issue, allowing an attacker to make a logged in administrator import files. As the plugin also did not validate uploaded files, it could lead to RCE.
The WP Fastest Cache WordPress plugin before 1.1.5 does not have CSRF check in an AJAX action, and does not validate user input before using it in the wp_remote_get() function, leading to a Blind SSRF issue
The wp_ajax_save_fbe_settings and wp_ajax_delete_fbe_settings AJAX actions of the Facebook for WordPress plugin before 3.0.4 were vulnerable to CSRF due to a lack of nonce protection. The settings in the saveFbeSettings function had no sanitization allowing for script tags to be saved.
This affects all versions of package sqlite-web. The SQL dashboard area allows sensitive actions to be performed without validating that the request originated from the application. This could enable an attacker to trick a user into performing these actions unknowingly through a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) and Cisco Cloud Network Controller, formerly Cisco Cloud APIC, could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. If the affected user has administrative privileges, these actions could include modifying the system configuration and creating new privileged accounts.
VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) contains a CSRF bypass vulnerability. A malicious user could execute actions on the vROps platform on behalf of the authenticated victim user.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities [CWE-352] in FortiAIOps version 2.0.0 may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform arbitrary actions on behalf of an authenticated user via tricking the victim to execute malicious GET requests.
DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/catalog_del.php.
A CSRF in Concrete CMS version 8.5.5 and below allows an attacker to clone topics which can lead to UI inconvenience, and exhaustion of disk space.Credit for discovery: "Solar Security Research Team"
An issue was discovered in the Image Resizer plugin before 2.0.9 for Craft CMS. There are CSRF issues with the log-clear controller action.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business Smart and Managed Switches could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user. If the user has administrative privileges, the attacker could alter the configuration, execute commands, or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on NTT EAST Hikari Denwa routers with firmware PR-400MI, RT-400MI, and RV-440MI 07.00.1006 and earlier and NTT WEST Hikari Denwa routers with firmware PR-400MI, RT-400MI, and RV-440MI 07.00.1005 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/module_main.php
TuziCMS 2.0.6 has index.php/manage/link/do_add CSRF.
CSRF tokens are generated using math/rand, which is not a cryptographically secure random number generator, allowing an attacker to predict values and bypass CSRF protections with relatively few requests.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Leithold DSGVO All in one for WP.This issue affects DSGVO All in one for WP: from n/a through 4.3.
DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/article_add.php
Yoga Class Registration System version 1.0 allows an administrator to execute commands on the server. This is possible because the application does not correctly validate the thumbnails of the classes uploaded by the administrators.
Advantech ADAM-5630 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. It allows an attacker to partly circumvent the same origin policy, which is designed to prevent different websites from interfering with each other.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bytesforall Atahualpa.This issue affects Atahualpa: from n/a through 3.7.24.