Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Zone Inline Image Upload for BBPress.This issue affects Inline Image Upload for BBPress: from n/a through 1.1.18.

The File Manager Pro WordPress plugin before 1.8 does not properly check the CSRF nonce in the `fs_connector` AJAX action. This allows attackers to make highly privileged users perform unwanted file system actions via CSRF attacks by using GET requests, such as uploading a web shell.

The BEAR for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.3.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the woobe_bulk_delete_products function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in Fortinet FortiVoiceEnterprise version 6.4.x, 6.0.x, FortiSwitch version 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, 6.4.0 through 6.4.10, 6.2.0 through 6.2.7, 6.0.x, FortiMail version 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 6.4.0 through 6.4.6, 6.2.x, 6.0.x FortiRecorder version 6.4.0 through 6.4.2, 6.0.x, 2.7.x, 2.6.x, FortiNDR version 1.x.x allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute commands on the CLI via tricking an authenticated administrator to execute malicious GET requests.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Winkler teachPress.This issue affects teachPress: from n/a through 9.0.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Advanced Flamingo.This issue affects Advanced Flamingo: from n/a through 1.0.

SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, had insufficient protection against Cross-Site Request Forgery, which could be used to trick user in to browsing malicious site.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ecwid Ecommerce Ecwid Ecommerce Shopping Cart.This issue affects Ecwid Ecommerce Shopping Cart: from n/a through 6.12.4.

In BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.1.0.3, 14.1.0-14.1.2.5, 13.1.0-13.1.3.3, 12.1.0-12.1.5.1, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also referred to as the Configuration utility, exists in an undisclosed page.

The ImageMagick Engine plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to remote code execution via the 'cli_path' parameter in versions up to, and including 1.7.5. This makes it possible for unauthenticated users to run arbitrary commands leading to remote command execution, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This makes it possible for an attacker to create and or modify files hosted on the server which can easily grant attackers backdoor access to the affected server.

In BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.1.0.4, 14.1.0-14.1.2.6, 13.1.0-13.1.3.3, 12.1.0-12.1.5.1, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2, iControl REST does not implement Cross Site Request Forgery protections for users which make use of Basic Authentication in a web browser.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mike Strand Bulk Comment Remove allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Bulk Comment Remove: from n/a through 2.

JFinalCMS v5.0.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/category/update.

AOS-CX lacks Anti-CSRF protections in place for state-changing operations. This can potentially be exploited by an attacker to execute commands in the context of another user in ArubaOS-CX Switches version(s): AOS-CX 10.10.xxxx: 10.10.0002 and below, AOS-CX 10.09.xxxx: 10.09.1020 and below, AOS-CX 10.08.xxxx: 10.08.1060 and below, AOS-CX 10.06.xxxx: 10.06.0200 and below. Aruba has released upgrades for ArubaOS-CX Switch Devices that address this security vulnerability.

An issue was discovered on D-Link DCS-1130 devices. The device provides a crossdomain.xml file with no restrictions on who can access the webserver. This allows an hosted flash file on any domain to make calls to the device's webserver and pull any information that is stored on the device. In this case, user's credentials are stored in clear text on the device and can be pulled easily. It also seems that the device does not implement any cross-site scripting forgery protection mechanism which allows an attacker to trick a user who is logged in to the web management interface into executing a cross-site flashing attack on the user's browser and execute any action on the device provided by the web management interface which steals the credentials from tools_admin.cgi file's response and displays it inside a Textfield.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in СleanTalk - Anti-Spam Protection Spam protection, Anti-Spam, FireWall by CleanTalk.This issue affects Spam protection, Anti-Spam, FireWall by CleanTalk: from n/a through 6.20.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Awesome Support Team Awesome Support – WordPress HelpDesk & Support Plugin allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Awesome Support – WordPress HelpDesk & Support Plugin: from n/a through 6.1.4.

Cross-site request forgery in Teltonika firmware TRB2_R_00.02.04.3 allows a remote attacker to perform sensitive application actions by tricking legitimate users into clicking a crafted link.

The Ecwid Ecommerce Shopping Cart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 6.10.23. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ecwid_update_plugin_params function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin options granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Use Any Font (WordPress plugin) <= 6.1.7 allows an attacker to deactivate the API key.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Live Chat - Live support version 3.1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Stormhill Media MyBookTable Bookstore by Stormhill Media allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects MyBookTable Bookstore by Stormhill Media: from n/a through 3.3.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in ThemeHigh Job Manager & Career – Manage job board listings, and recruitments.This issue affects Job Manager & Career – Manage job board listings, and recruitments: from n/a through 1.4.4.

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Take-Note App 1.0 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-239350 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Winkler teachPress.This issue affects teachPress: from n/a through 9.0.5.

The BEAR for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.3.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the woobe_bulkoperations_delete function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OceanWP Ocean Extra.This issue affects Ocean Extra: from n/a through 2.2.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wow-Company Button Generator – easily Button Builder.This issue affects Button Generator – easily Button Builder: from n/a through 2.3.8.

This vulnerability occured by sending a malicious POST request to a specific page while logged in random user from some family of IPTIME NAS. Remote attackers can steal root privileges by changing the password of the root through a POST request.

YzmCMS v6.3 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgey (CSRF) via the component /yzmcms/comment/index/init.html.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Bosch PRAESIDEO until and including version 4.41 and Bosch PRAESENSA until and including version 1.10 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger actions on an affected system on behalf of another user (Cross-Site Request Forgery). This requires the victim to be tricked into clicking a malicious link or submitting a malicious form. A successful exploit allows the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privileges of the victim, e.g. creating and modifying user accounts, changing system configuration settings and cause DoS conditions. Note: For Bosch PRAESIDEO 4.31 and newer and Bosch PRAESENSA in all versions, the confidentiality impact is considered low because user credentials are not shown in the web interface.

IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 191391.

IBM MQ Appliance 9.1 and 9.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 191815.

The XWiki Admin Tools Application provides tools to help the administration of XWiki. Prior to version 4.5.1, a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the query on XWiki tool allows executing arbitrary database queries on the database of the XWiki installation. Among other things, this allows modifying and deleting all data of the wiki. This could be both used to damage the wiki and to create an account with elevated privileges for the attacker, thus impacting the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the whole XWiki instance. A possible attack vector are comments on the wiki, by embedding an image with wiki syntax like `[[image:path:/xwiki/bin/view/Admin/QueryOnXWiki?query=DELETE%20FROM%20xwikidoc]]`, all documents would be deleted from the database when an admin user views this comment. This has been patched in Admin Tools Application 4.5.1 by adding form token checks. Some workarounds are available. The patch can also be applied manually to the affected pages. Alternatively, if the query tool is not needed, by deleting the document `Admin.SQLToolsGroovy`, all database query tools can be deactivated.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.15.1.

SmodBIP is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery, that could be used to induce logged in users to perform unintended actions, including creation of additional accounts with administrative privileges. This issue affects all versions of SmodBIP. SmodBIP is no longer maintained and the vulnerability will not be fixed.

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Contact Manager App 1.0. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file update.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-239354 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Seraphinite Solutions Seraphinite Post .DOCX Source allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Seraphinite Post .DOCX Source: from n/a through 2.16.6.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in [Calendar01] free edition ver1.0.0 and [Calendar02] free edition ver1.0.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Contact Manager App 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file add.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-239353 was assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Andrea Landonio Taxonomy filter allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Taxonomy filter: from n/a through 2.2.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Apasionados, Apasionados del Marketing, NetConsulting DoFollow Case by Case.This issue affects DoFollow Case by Case: from n/a through 3.4.2.

Dreamer CMS v4.1.3 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/archives/add.

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.3.5, 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.3, and 6.1.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 186283.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marketing Rapel MkRapel Regiones y Ciudades de Chile para WC.This issue affects MkRapel Regiones y Ciudades de Chile para WC: from n/a through 4.3.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CodeAstrology Team Quantity Plus Minus Button for WooCommerce by CodeAstrology.This issue affects Quantity Plus Minus Button for WooCommerce by CodeAstrology: from n/a through 1.1.9.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Easy Property Listings versions prior to 3.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WebToffee Decorator – WooCommerce Email Customizer allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Decorator – WooCommerce Email Customizer: from n/a through 1.2.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saiful Islam Add to Cart Text Changer and Customize Button, Add Custom Icon.This issue affects Add to Cart Text Changer and Customize Button, Add Custom Icon: from n/a through 2.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kevin Ohashi WPPerformanceTester.This issue affects WPPerformanceTester: from n/a through 2.0.0.