Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the 'pvmsg.php?action=add_message', pvmsg.php?action=confirm_delete , and ajax.server.php?page=user&action=flip_follow endpoints in Ampache <= 6.6.0.

Navigate CMS 2.8.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to upload malicious extensions through a crafted HTML page. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into executing arbitrary file uploads by leveraging the extension upload functionality without additional validation.

The Kali Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to incorrect nonce handling throughout the plugin's function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to access the plugin's administrative functions via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Multiple endpoints in GestioIP v3.5.7 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An attacker can execute actions via the admin's browser by hosting a malicious URL, leading to data modification, deletion, or exfiltration.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eMarket Design YouTube Video Gallery by YouTube Showcase plugin <= 3.3.5 versions.

Edimax EW-7438RPn-v3 Mini 1.27 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) that can lead to command execution. An attacker can trick an authenticated user into submitting a crafted form to the /goform/mp endpoint, resulting in arbitrary command execution on the device with the user's privileges.

AVideo Platform 8.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to reset user passwords by exploiting the password recovery mechanism. Attackers can craft malicious requests to the recoverPass endpoint using the user's recovery token to change account credentials without authentication.

A vulnerability was found in destiny.gg chat. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects the function websocket.Upgrader of the file main.go. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The name of the patch is bebd256fc3063111fb4503ca25e005ebf6e73780. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier VDB-216521 was assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

The Contact Form With Captcha WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation in the ~/cfwc-form.php file during contact form submission, which made it possible for attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in versions up to, and including 1.6.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Criss Swaim TPG Redirect plugin <= 1.0.7 versions.

GestSup versions up to and including 3.2.60 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability where the application does not verify the authenticity of client requests. An attacker can induce a logged-in user to submit crafted requests that perform actions with the victim's privileges. This can be exploited to create privileged accounts by targeting the administrative user creation endpoint.

themegrill-demo-importer before 1.6.3 allows CSRF, as demonstrated by wiping the database.

An issue was discovered in the PageLayer plugin before 1.1.2 for WordPress. The pagelayer_settings_page function is vulnerable to CSRF, which can lead to XSS.

WeGIA v3.2.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

Nagios Core application version 4.2.4 is vulnerable to Site-Wide Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in many functions, like adding – deleting for hosts or servers.

An issue was discovered in the XCloner Backup and Restore plugin before 4.2.153 for WordPress. It allows CSRF (via almost any endpoint).

BigProf Online Invoicing System before 3.0 offers a functionality that allows an administrator to move the records of members across groups. The applicable endpoint (admin/pageTransferOwnership.php) lacks CSRF protection, resulting in an attacker being able to escalate their privileges to Administrator and effectively taking over the application.

showdoc is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects GS716Tv3 before 6.3.1.36 and GS724Tv4 before 6.3.1.36.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exits in Catfish <=6.1.* when you upload an html file containing CSRF on the website that uses a google editor; you can specify the menu url address as your malicious url address in the Add Menu column.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smash Balloon Custom Twitter Feeds (Tweets Widget) allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Custom Twitter Feeds (Tweets Widget): from n/a through 2.2.3.

A vulnerability exists in CakePHP versions 4.0.x through 4.1.3. The CsrfProtectionMiddleware component allows method override parameters to bypass CSRF checks by changing the HTTP request method to an arbitrary string that is not in the list of request methods that CakePHP checks. Additionally, the route middleware does not verify that this overriden method (which can be an arbitrary string) is actually an HTTP method.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PingOnline Dyslexiefont Free plugin <= 1.0.0 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Himanshu Parashar Google Site Verification plugin using Meta Tag.This issue affects Google Site Verification plugin using Meta Tag: from n/a through 1.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Apa APA Register Newsletter Form allows SQL Injection.This issue affects APA Register Newsletter Form: from n/a through 1.0.0.

An issue was discovered in the PushToWatch extension for MediaWiki through 1.35.1. The primary form did not implement an anti-CSRF token and therefore was completely vulnerable to CSRF attacks against onSkinAddFooterLinks in PushToWatch.php.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Star Practice Management Web version 2019.2.0.6, allowing an attacker to change the privileges of any user of the application. This can be used to grant himself administrative role or remove the administrative account of the application.

This affects the package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.12 from 0 and before 0.6.1; all versions of package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.11; the package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.13 from 0 and before 0.6.1. CSRF protection can be bypassed by forging a request that contains the same value for both the X-XSRF-TOKEN header and the XSRF-TOKEN cookie value, as the check in randomTokenCsrfProtection only checks that the two values are equal and non-empty.

Textpattern CMS 4.6.2 allows CSRF via the prefs subsystem.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0). The CLI feature in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). This could allow an attacker to read or modify the device configuration by tricking an authenticated legitimate user into accessing a malicious link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ShortPixel ShortPixel Adaptive Images – WebP, AVIF, CDN, Image Optimization plugin <= 3.7.1 versions.

The Amministrazione Trasparente plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the at_save_aturl_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in xtemos WoodMart - Multipurpose WooCommerce Theme <= 7.1.1 versions.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link while having an active session on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user.

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects D6200 before 1.1.00.38, D7000 before 1.0.1.78, JR6150 before 1.0.1.24, R6020 before 1.0.0.42, R6050 before 1.0.1.24, R6080 before 1.0.0.42, R6120 before 1.0.0.66, R6220 before 1.1.0.100, R6260 before 1.1.0.64, R6700v2 before 1.2.0.62, R6800 before 1.2.0.62, R6900v2 before 1.2.0.62, R7450 before 1.2.0.62, and WNR2020 before 1.1.0.62.

forma.lms 2.3.0.2 is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in formalms/appCore/index.php?r=lms/profile/show&ap=saveinfo via a GET request to change the admin email address in order to accomplish an account takeover.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in TinyFileManager all version up to and including 2.4.6 that allows attackers to upload files and run OS commands by inducing the Administrator user to browse a URL controlled by an attacker.

An issue was discovered in SmartStoreNET before 4.1.0. Lack of Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection may lead to elevation of privileges (e.g., /admin/customer/create to create an admin account).

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'), Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), : Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine vulnerability in Apache OFBiz. This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.17. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.17, which fixes the issue.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Tran Table of Contents Plus allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Table of Contents Plus: from n/a through 2408.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in katlings pyambic-pentameter. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is 974f21aa1b2527ef39c8afe1a5060548217deca8. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-216498 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

IBM Watson Studio Local 1.2.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exits in hostel management system 2.1 via the name field in my-profile.php. Chaining to this both vulnerabilities leads to account takeover.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webTareas version 2.4 and earlier allows a remote attacker to create a new administrative profile and add a new user to the new profile. without the victim's knowledge, by enticing an authenticated admin user to visit an attacker's web page.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Henrique Rodrigues SafetyForms allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects SafetyForms: from n/a through 1.0.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP-buy WP Content Copy Protection & No Right Click allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Content Copy Protection & No Right Click: from n/a through 3.5.9.

All versions of @fastify/oauth2 used a statically generated state parameter at startup time and were used across all requests for all users. The purpose of the Oauth2 state parameter is to prevent Cross-Site-Request-Forgery attacks. As such, it should be unique per user and should be connected to the user's session in some way that will allow the server to validate it. v7.2.0 changes the default behavior to store the state in a cookie with the http-only and same-site=lax attributes set. The state is now by default generated for every user. Note that this contains a breaking change in the checkStateFunction function, which now accepts the full Request object.

The Core component of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO iProcess Workspace (Browser) contains a vulnerability that theoretically allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to execute a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack on the affected system. A successful attack using this vulnerability requires human interaction from an authenticated user other than the attacker. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO iProcess Workspace (Browser): versions 11.6.0 and below.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bhaskar Dhote Back Link Tracker allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Back Link Tracker: from n/a through 1.0.0.

snipe-it is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)