Due to missing authorization check in an RFC enabled function module in transaction SDCCN, an authenticated attacker could generate technical meta-data. This leads to a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality or availability

Due to missing authorization check in an RFC enabled function module in transaction SDCCN, an unauthenticated attacker could generate technical meta-data. This leads to a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality or availability.

An authenticated user with low privileges can exploit a missing authorization check in an IBS module of FS-RBD, allowing unauthorized access to perform actions beyond their intended permissions. This causes a low impact on integrity with no impact on confidentiality and availability.

SAP Focused RUN versions 200, 300, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, which allows a user to call the oData service and manipulate the activation for the SAP EarlyWatch Alert service data collection and sending to SAP without the intended authorization.

SAP NetWeaver AS JAVA (Customer Usage Provisioning Servlet), versions - 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, allows an attacker to read some statistical data like product version, traffic, timestamp etc. because of missing authorization check in the servlet.

SAP's HCM Travel Management Fiori Apps V2, version - 608, does not perform proper authorization check, allowing an authenticated but unauthorized attacker to read personnel numbers of employees, resulting in escalation of privileges. However, the attacker can only read some information like last name, first name of the employees, so there is some loss of confidential information, Integrity and Availability are not impacted.

An obsolete functionality in SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP did not perform necessary authorization checks. Because of this, an authenticated attacker could obtain information that would otherwise be restricted. It has no impact on integrity or availability on the application.

SAP Fiori App Intercompany Balance Reconciliation does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This has high impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application ,availability is not impacted.

Due to missing authorization check in the SAP ERP Central Component (SAP ECC) and SAP S/4HANA (SAP EHS Management), an attacker could extract hardcoded clear-text credentials and bypass the password authentication check by manipulating user parameters. Upon successful exploitation, the attacker can access, modify or delete certain change pointer information within EHS objects in the application which might further affect the subsequent systems. This vulnerability leads to a low impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application with no affect on the availability.

SAP BusinessObjects BI Platform allows an unauthenticated attacker to craft a specific network request to the trusted endpoint that breaks the authentication, which prevents the legitimate users from accessing the platform. As a result, it has a high impact on the availability but no impact on the confidentiality and integrity.

SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP and ABAP Platform allows an authenticated, low-privileged user to perform background Remote Function Calls without the required S_RFC authorization in certain cases. This can result in a high impact on integrity and availability, and no impact on the confidentiality of the application.

SAP Payment Engine version 500, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP and ABAP Platform, versions - 700, 702, 710, 711, 730, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, contains function module SRM_RFC_SUBMIT_REPORT which fails to validate authorization of an authenticated user thus allowing an unauthorized user to execute reports in SAP NetWeaver ABAP Platform.

SAP Banking Services (Generic Market Data) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. An unauthorized User is allowed to display restricted Business Partner Generic Market Data (GMD), due to improper authorization check.

The BW Database Interface does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges that allows the user to practically read out any database table.

SAP Enterprise Financial Services versions, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 600, 603, 604, 605, 606, 616, 617, 618, 800, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

Statutory Reporting for Insurance Companies in SAP ERP (EA-FINSERV versions - 600, 603, 604, 605, 606, 616, 617, 618, 800 and S4CORE versions 101, 102, 103, 104) does not execute the required authorization checks for an authenticated user, allowing an attacker to view and tamper with certain restricted data leading to Missing Authorization Check.

SAP Commerce, versions 1811, 1905, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an anonymous user, due to Missing Authorization Check. This affects confidentiality of secure media.

SAP Host Agent, version 7.21, allows an unprivileged user to read the shared memory or write to the shared memory by sending request to the main SAPOSCOL process and receive responses that may contain data read with user root privileges e.g. size of any directory, system hardware and OS details, leading to Missing Authorization Check vulnerability.

SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, allowing access to administration accounts by a user with no roles, leading to Missing Authorization Check.

SAP Master Data Governance, versions - 748, 749, 750, 751, 752, 800, 801, 802, 803, 804, allows users to display change request details without having required authorizations, due to Missing Authorization Check.

Under certain conditions SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise, versions 15.7, 16.0, allows an attacker to access information which would otherwise be restricted leading to Missing Authorization Check.

VAT Pro-Rata reports in SAP ERP (SAP_APPL versions 600, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 616 and SAP_FIN versions 617, 618, 700, 720, 730) and SAP S/4 HANA (versions 100, 101, 102, 103, 104) do not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user leading to Missing Authorization Check.

SAP S/4 HANA (Fiori UI for General Ledger Accounting), versions 103, 104, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user working with attachment service, allowing the attacker to delete attachments due to Missing Authorization Check.

Missing authorization check in a transaction within SAP Leasing (update provided in SAP_APPL 6.18, EA-APPL 6.0, 6.02, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16 and 6.17).

SAP Identity Management, version 8.0, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, allowing the attacker to view certain sensitive information of the victim, leading to Missing Authorization Check.

The selection query in SAP Treasury and Risk Management (Transaction Management) (EA-FINSERV?versions 600, 603, 604, 605, 606, 616, 617, 618, 800 and S4CORE versions 101, 102, 103, 104) returns more records than it should be when selecting and displaying the contract number, leading to Missing Authorization Check.

SAP ERP and SAP S/4 HANA allows an authenticated user to see cost records to objects to which he has no authorization in PS reporting, leading to Missing Authorization check.

SAP Banking Services (Generic Market Data), versions - 400, 450, 500, allows an unauthorized user to display protected Business Partner Generic Market Data (GMD) and change related GMD key figure values, due to Missing Authorization Check.

SAP S/4 HANA (Financial Products Subledger and Banking Services), versions - FSAPPL 400, 450, 500 and S4FPSL 100, allows an authenticated user to run an analysis report due to Missing Authorization Check, resulting in slowing the system.

SAP ERP (HCM Travel Management), versions - 600, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, allows an authenticated but unauthorized attacker to read, modify and settle trips, resulting in escalation of privileges, due to Missing Authorization Check.

A missing authorization check allows an arbitrary authenticated user to perform certain operations through the API of CLA-assistant by executing specific additional steps. This allows an arbitrary authenticated user to read CLA information including information of the persons who signed them as well as custom fields the CLA requester had configured. In addition, an arbitrary authenticated user can update or delete the CLA-configuration for repositories or organizations using CLA-assistant. The stored access tokens for GitHub are not affected, as these are redacted from the API-responses.

The SAP BW BICS communication layer in SAP Business Warehouse and SAP BW/4HANA - version SAP_BW 730, SAP_BW 731, SAP_BW 740, SAP_BW 730, SAP_BW 750, DW4CORE 100, DW4CORE 200, DW4CORE 300, may expose unauthorized cell values to the data response. To be able to exploit this, the user still needs authorizations on the query as well as on the keyfigure/measure level. The missing check only affects the data level.

The RFC enabled function module allows a low privileged user to perform various actions, such as modifying the URLs of any user's favourite nodes and workbook ID. There is low impact on integrity and availability of the application.

SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP and ABAP Platform allows an authenticated attacker to gain higher access levels than they should have by exploiting improper authorization checks, resulting in privilege escalation. While authorizations for import and export are distinguished, a single authorization is applied for both, which may contribute to these risks. On successful exploitation, this can result in potential security concerns. However, it has no impact on the integrity and availability of the application and may have only a low impact on data confidentiality.

Cash Operations does not perform necessary authorization check for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges causing low impact to confidentiality to the application.

SAP HCM Approve Timesheets Version 4 application does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.There is low impact on integrity of the application. Confidentiality and availibility are not impacted.

Vendor Master Hierarchy - versions SAP_APPL 500, SAP_APPL 600, SAP_APPL 602, SAP_APPL 603, SAP_APPL 604, SAP_APPL 605, SAP_APPL 606, SAP_APPL 616, SAP_APPL 617, SAP_APPL 618, S4CORE 100, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user to access some of its function. This could lead to modification of data impacting the integrity of the system.

The RFC enabled function module allows a low privileged user to perform denial of service on any user and also change or delete favourite nodes. By sending a crafted packet in the function module targeting specific parameters, the specific targeted user will no longer have access to any functionality of SAP GUI. There is low impact on integrity and availability of the application.

Due to lack of proper authorization checks when calling user, a function module in obsolete Tobin interface in SAP Production and Revenue Accounting allows unauthorized access that could lead to disclosure of highly sensitive data. There is no impact on integrity or availability.

An authenticated attacker with high privilege can use functions of SLCM transactions to which access should be restricted. This may result in an escalation of privileges causing low impact on integrity of the application.

Due to missing authorization checks, SAP Business Warehouse (BEx Analyzer) allows an authenticated attacker to access information over the network which is otherwise restricted. On successful exploitation the attacker can enumerate information causing a limited impact on confidentiality of the application.

The RFC enabled function module allows a low privileged user to add any workbook to any user's workplace favourites. This vulnerability could be utilized to identify usernames and access information about targeted user's workplaces. There is low impact on integrity of the application.

The RFC enabled function module allows a low privileged user to add URLs to any user's workplace favourites. This vulnerability could be utilized to identify usernames and access information about targeted user's workplaces, and nodes. There is low impact on integrity of the application

Due to missing authorization check in SAP for Oil & Gas (Transportation and Distribution), an attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user could call a remote-enabled function which will allow them to delete non-sensitive entries in a user data table. There is no effect on confidentiality or availability.

Due to missing authorization check in SAP NetWeaver AS Java (System Landscape Directory) an unauthorized user can read and modify some restricted global SLD configurations causing low impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application.

SAP Enterprise Financial Services, versions 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 8.0 (in business function EAFS_BCA_BUSOPR_2) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

SAP shared service framework allows an authenticated non-administrative user to call a remote-enabled function, which will allow them to insert value entries into a non-sensitive table, causing low impact on integrity of the application

Due to a missing authorization check on service endpoints in the SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java, an attacker with standard user role can create JCo connection entries, which are used for remote function calls from or to the application server. This could lead to low impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application.

The RFC enabled function module allows a low privileged user to delete the workplace favourites of any user. This vulnerability could be utilized to identify usernames and access information about targeted user's workplaces and nodes. There is low impact on integrity and availability of the application.