SAP Student Life Cycle Management (SLcM) fails to conduct proper authorization checks for authenticated users, leading to the potential escalation of privileges. On successful exploitation it could allow an attacker to delete non-sensitive report variants that are typically restricted, causing minimal impact on the integrity of the application.
The RFC enabled function module allows a low privileged user to read any user's workplace favourites and user menu along with all the specific data of each node. Usernames can be enumerated by exploiting vulnerability. There is low impact on confidentiality of the application.
Manage Bank Statement ReProcessing Rules does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can delete rules of other users affecting the integrity of the application. Confidentiality and Availability are not affected.
SAP S/4 HANA Map Treasury Correspondence Format Data does not perform necessary authorization check for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This could allow an attacker to delete the data with a high impact to availability.
SAP Fiori apps for Travel Management in SAP ERP (My Travel Requests) - version 600, allows an authenticated attacker to exploit a certain misconfigured application endpoint to view sensitive data. This endpoint is normally exposed over the network and successful exploitation can lead to exposure of data like travel documents.
In SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform, if Single Signed On is enabled on Enterprise authentication, an unauthorized user can get a logon token using a REST endpoint. The attacker can fully compromise the system resulting in High impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability.
SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP and ABAP Platform - versions 700, 701, 702, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
Due to missing authorization checks, SAP BEx Analyzer allows an authenticated attacker to access information over the network which is otherwise restricted. On successful exploitation the attacker can enumerate information causing a limited impact on confidentiality of the application.
Due to missing authorization check, SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP and ABAP Platform allows an attacker logged in as a developer to read objects contained in a package. This causes an impact on confidentiality, as this attacker would otherwise not have access to view these objects.
Due to missing authorization check in SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP and ABAP Platform, an authenticated attacker could call an underlying transaction, which leads to disclosure of user related information. There is no impact on integrity or availability.
SAP Document Builder does not perform necessary authorization checks for one of the function modules resulting in escalation of privileges causing low impact on confidentiality of the application.
Elements of PDCE does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This allows an attacker to read sensitive information causing high impact on the confidentiality of the application.
SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP (Web Dynpro), versions - 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 782, allows an authenticated user to access Web Dynpro components, which reveals sensitive system information that would otherwise be restricted to highly privileged users because of missing authorization, resulting in Information Disclosure.
SAP HCM Fiori App My Forms (Fiori 2.0) - version 605, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user exposing the restricted header data.
SAP Solution Manager 7.2 (User Experience Monitoring), version - 7.2, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user. Due to inadequate access control, a network attacker authenticated as a regular user can use operations which should be restricted to administrators. These operations can be used to Change the User Experience Monitoring configuration, obtain details about the configured SAP Solution Manager agents, Deploy a malicious User Experience Monitoring script.
SAP AS ABAP (SAP Landscape Transformation), versions - 2011_1_620, 2011_1_640, 2011_1_700, 2011_1_710, 2011_1_730, 2011_1_731, 2011_1_752, 2020 and SAP S4 HANA (SAP Landscape Transformation), versions - 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, allows a high privileged user to execute a RFC function module to which access should be restricted, however due to missing authorization an attacker can get access to some sensitive internal information of vulnerable SAP system or to make vulnerable SAP systems completely unavailable.
In SAP GRC (Process Control) - versions GRCFND_A V1200, GRCFND_A V8100, GRCPINW V1100_700, GRCPINW V1100_731, GRCPINW V1200_750, remote-enabled function module in the proprietary SAP solution enables an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to access all the confidential data stored in the database. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can expose user credentials from client-specific tables of the database, leading to high impact on confidentiality.
An unauthenticated user can attach to an open interface exposed through JNDI by the Messaging System of SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (PI) - version 7.50. This user can make use of an open naming and directory API to access services that could perform unauthorized operations. The vulnerability affects local users and data, leading to a considerable impact on confidentiality as well as availability and a limited impact on the integrity of the application. These operations can be used to: * Read any information * Modify sensitive information * Denial of Service attacks (DoS) * SQL Injection
An unauthenticated attacker over the network can attach to an open interface exposed through JNDI by the User Defined Search (UDS) of SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (PI) - version 7.50 and make use of an open naming and directory API to access services which can be used to perform unauthorized operations affecting users and data across the entire system. This allows the attacker to have full read access to user data, make limited modifications to user data, and degrade the performance of the system, leading to a high impact on confidentiality and a limited impact on the availability and integrity of the application.
Due to missing authorization check in SAP S/4HANA Condition Maintenance, an authenticated attacker could gain unauthorized access to view and modify condition table records, resulting in low impact on the confidentiality and integrity of the data. Additionally, this vulnerability may prevent the legitimate user from accessing the records, causing low impact on application availability.
Due to insecure session management, SAP Enable Now allows an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to user's account. On successful exploitation, an attacker can view or modify user data causing limited impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application.
The application SAP Enterprise Extension Defense Forces & Public Security - versions 605, 606, 616,617,618, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user over the network, resulting in escalation of privileges leading to a limited impact on confidentiality.
SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP and ABAP Platform do not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
An unauthenticated user can use functions of XML Data Archiving Service of SAP NetWeaver Application Server for Java - version 7.50, to which access should be restricted. This may result in an escalation of privileges.
A missing authority check in SAP CRM, versions - 700, 701, 702, 712, 713, 714, could be leveraged by an attacker with high privileges to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the system.
SAP Shared Service Framework does not perform necessary authorization check for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. On successful exploitation, an attacker can cause a high impact on confidentiality of the application.
Manage Bank Statement ReProcessing Rules does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can enable/disable the sharing rule of other users affecting the integrity of the application. Confidentiality and Availability are not affected.
Due to missing authorization checks, SAP Enable Now allows an author to escalate privileges to access information which should otherwise be restricted. On successful exploitation, the attacker can cause limited impact on confidentiality of the application.
SAP Treasury and Risk Management (EA-FINSERV 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18 and 8.0; S4CORE 1.01, 1.02 and 1.03), does not perform necessary authorization checks for authorization objects T_DEAL_DP and T_DEAL_PD , resulting in escalation of privileges.
Order processing in SAP ERP Sales (corrected in SAP_APPL 6.0, 6.02, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18) and S4HANA Sales (corrected in S4CORE 1.0, 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04) does not execute the required authorization checks for an authenticated user, which can result in an escalation of privileges.
Customizing functionality of SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP Platform (fixed in versions from 7.0 to 7.02, from 7.10 to 7.11, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, from 7.50 to 7.53, from 7.74 to 7.75) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
Under some circumstances, masterdata maintenance in SAP BW/4HANA (fixed in DW4CORE version 1.0 (SP08)) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
SAP Kernel (ABAP Debugger), versions KRNL32NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL32UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL64NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, KRNL64UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.73, KERNEL 7.21, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, 7.75, 7.76, 7.77, allows a user to execute “Go to statement” without possessing the authorization S_DEVELOP DEBUG 02, resulting in Missing Authorization Check
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (B2B Toolkit), before versions 1.0 and 2.0, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, allowing the import of B2B table content that leads to Missing Authorization Check.
SAP ERP HCM (SAP_HRCES) , version 3, does not perform necessary authorization checks for a report that reads payroll data of employees in a certain area. Due to this under certain conditions, the user that once had authorization to payroll data of an employee, which was later revoked, may retain access to the same data.
ABAP BASIS function modules INST_CREATE_R3_RFC_DEST, INST_CREATE_TCPIP_RFCDEST, and INST_CREATE_TCPIP_RFC_DEST in SAP BASIS (fixed in versions 7.0 to 7.02, 7.10 to 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50 to 7.53) do not perform necessary authorization checks in all circumstances for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
Read of RFC destination does not always perform necessary authorization checks, resulting in escalation of privileges to access information on RFC destinations on managed systems and SAP Solution Manager system (ST-PI, before versions 2008_1_700, 2008_1_710, and 740).
SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.01, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
ABAP Server of SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform fail to perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This has been corrected in the following versions: KRNL32NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL32UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL64NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.74, KRNL64UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.73, 7.74, 8.04, KERNEL 7.21, 7.45, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, 7.74, 7.75, 8.04.
SAP Financial Consolidation - version 1010,�does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
SAP Enterprise Financial Services (SAPSCORE 1.11, 1.12; S4CORE 1.01, 1.02; EA-FINSERV 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 8.0) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
By default, the SAP NetWeaver AS Java keystore service does not sufficiently restrict the access to resources that should be protected. This has been fixed in SAP NetWeaver AS Java (ServerCore versions 7.11, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50).
Missing authorization check in SAP HCM Fiori "People Profile" (GBX01 HR version 6.0) for an authenticated user which may result in an escalation of privileges.
SAP ERP Financials Information System (SAP_APPL 6.00, 6.02, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16; SAP_FIN 6.17, 6.18, 7.00, 7.20, 7.30 S4CORE 1.00, 1.01, 1.02) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
SAP Enterprise Financial Services (fixed in SAPSCORE 1.13, 1.14, 1.15; S4CORE 1.01, 1.02, 1.03; EA-FINSERV 1.10, 2.0, 5.0, 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 8.0; Bank/CFM 4.63_20) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
SAP Disclosure Management 10.1 does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
SAP Enterprise Financial Services, versions 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 8.0 (in business function EAFS_BCA_BUSOPR_SEPA) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
Executing transaction WRCK in SAP R/3 Enterprise Retail (EHP6) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
SAP Disclosure Management 10.1 does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.
SAP S/4HANA Finance (Advanced Payment Management) does not perform necessary authorization check for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. As a result, it has a low impact to confidentiality and availability but there is no impact on the integrity.