Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2024-41256

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-31 Jul, 2024 | 00:00
Updated At-18 Mar, 2025 | 17:59
Rejected At-
Credits

Default configurations in the ShareProofVerifier function of filestash v0.4 causes the application to skip the TLS certificate verification process when sending out email verification codes, possibly allowing attackers to access sensitive data via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:31 Jul, 2024 | 00:00
Updated At:18 Mar, 2025 | 17:59
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

Default configurations in the ShareProofVerifier function of filestash v0.4 causes the application to skip the TLS certificate verification process when sending out email verification codes, possibly allowing attackers to access sensitive data via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://gist.github.com/nyxfqq/a6da3fe6128b978ea1aaa5df639d5f98
N/A
Hyperlink: https://gist.github.com/nyxfqq/a6da3fe6128b978ea1aaa5df639d5f98
Resource: N/A
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-295CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-295
Description: CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.15.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:31 Jul, 2024 | 21:15
Updated At:18 Mar, 2025 | 18:15

Default configurations in the ShareProofVerifier function of filestash v0.4 causes the application to skip the TLS certificate verification process when sending out email verification codes, possibly allowing attackers to access sensitive data via a man-in-the-middle attack.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Secondary3.15.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CPE Matches

filestash
filestash
>>filestash>>Versions up to 0.4(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:filestash:filestash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE-295Secondary134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Secondary
Source: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://gist.github.com/nyxfqq/a6da3fe6128b978ea1aaa5df639d5f98cve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://gist.github.com/nyxfqq/a6da3fe6128b978ea1aaa5df639d5f98
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

102Records found

CVE-2024-41258
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 15.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jul, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-13 Mar, 2025 | 14:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in filestash v0.4. The usage of the ssh.InsecureIgnoreHostKey() disables host key verification, possibly allowing attackers to obtain sensitive information via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-filestashn/a
Product-filestashn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-16252
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 37.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jun, 2020 | 22:15
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Missing SSL Certificate Validation in the Nutfind.com application through 3.9.12 for Android allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to sniff and manipulate all API requests, including login credentials and location data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nutfindn/a
Product-nutfindn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2013-10001
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 48.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 May, 2022 | 07:30
Updated-15 Apr, 2025 | 14:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
HTC One/Sense Mail Client certificate validation

A vulnerability was found in HTC One/Sense 4.x. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is the certification validation of the mail client. An exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-htcHTC
Product-sensemailsdk_apione_svone_xOneSense
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-24320
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schneider Electric
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schneider Electric
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 40.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Feb, 2022 | 22:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 04:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability exists that could allow a Man-in-theMiddle attack when communications between the client and Geo SCADA database server are intercepted. Affected Product: ClearSCADA (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2019 (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2020 (All Versions)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/a
Product-clearscadaecostruxure_geo_scada_expert_2020ecostruxure_geo_scada_expert_2019ClearSCADA (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2019 (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2020 (All Versions)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1231
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.41% / 60.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Sep, 2019 | 21:24
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 18:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way Rome SDK handles server SSL/TLS certificate validation, aka 'Rome SDK Information Disclosure Vulnerability'.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-project_romeRome SDK
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-8943
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 May, 2017 | 18:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The PUMA PUMATRAC app 3.0.2 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aPuma
Product-pumatracn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-24319
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schneider Electric
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schneider Electric
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 35.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Feb, 2022 | 22:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 04:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability exists that could allow a Man-in-theMiddle attack when communications between the client and Geo SCADA web server are intercepted. Affected Product: ClearSCADA (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2019 (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2020 (All Versions)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/a
Product-clearscadaecostruxure_geo_scada_expert_2020ecostruxure_geo_scada_expert_2019ClearSCADA (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2019 (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2020 (All Versions)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-27768
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HCL Software
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HCL Software
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 27.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 May, 2022 | 21:25
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
An SSL certificate host verification vulnerability affects HCL Verse for Android

Using the ability to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack, which indicates a lack of hostname verification, sensitive account information was able to be intercepted. In this specific scenario, the application's network traffic was intercepted using a proxy server set up in 'transparent' mode while a certificate with an invalid hostname was active. The Android application was found to have hostname verification issues during the server setup and login flows; however, the application did not process requests post-login.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-HCL Technologies Ltd.
Product-verseVerse for Android
CWE ID-CWE-300
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-27189
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 49.74%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2021 | 23:16
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The CIRA Canadian Shield app before 4.0.13 for iOS lacks SSL Certificate Validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ciran/a
Product-canadian_shieldn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-35299
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JetBrains s.r.o.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JetBrains s.r.o.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 May, 2024 | 10:31
Updated-28 Jan, 2025 | 16:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2024.1.29548 the SMTPS protocol communication lacked proper certificate hostname validation

Action-Not Available
Vendor-JetBrains s.r.o.
Product-youtrackYouTrack
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-4830
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.58% / 68.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Sushiro App for iOS 2.1.16 and earlier and Sushiro App for Android 2.1.16.1 and earlier do not verify SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-akindo-sushiron/a
Product-sushiron/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-2993
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-6.73% / 90.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Sep, 2012 | 01:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Microsoft Windows Phone 7 does not verify the domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof an SSL server for the (1) POP3, (2) IMAP, or (3) SMTP protocol via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMicrosoft Corporation
Product-windows_phone_7windows_phone_7_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-32928
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Google Devices
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Google Devices
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 17.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Aug, 2024 | 16:38
Updated-14 Mar, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The libcurl CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER option was disabled on a subset of requests made by Nest production devices which enabled a potential man-in-the-middle attack on requests to Google cloud services by any host the traffic was routed through.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-CURLGoogle LLC
Product-nest_mininest_mini_firmwarelibcurlNest Speakers
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-20813
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-9||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.09% / 25.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2022 | 20:30
Updated-06 Nov, 2024 | 16:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in the API and in the web-based management interface of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) could allow a remote attacker to overwrite arbitrary files or conduct null byte poisoning attacks on an affected device. Note: Cisco Expressway Series refers to the Expressway Control (Expressway-C) device and the Expressway Edge (Expressway-E) device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-expresswaytelepresence_video_communication_serverCisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) Expressway
CWE ID-CWE-158
Improper Neutralization of Null Byte or NUL Character
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-20081
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MediaTek, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MediaTek, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Apr, 2022 | 19:37
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 02:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In A-GPS, there is a possible man in the middle attack due to improper certificate validation. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS06461919; Issue ID: ALPS06461919.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Google LLCMediaTek Inc.
Product-mt6873mt6893mt8675mt6771mt6833mt6580mt6885mt6983mt6735mt8666mt6753mt6877mt6781mt6765mt6853mt6883mt6737mt8667mt6895mt6739androidmt6761mt6889mt6768mt6779mt6785mt6879MT6580, MT6735, MT6737, MT6739, MT6753, MT6761, MT6765, MT6768, MT6771, MT6779, MT6781, MT6785, MT6833, MT6853, MT6873, MT6877, MT6879, MT6883, MT6885, MT6889, MT6893, MT6895, MT6983, MT8666, MT8667, MT8675
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-46496
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Feb, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-26 Mar, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

BTicino Door Entry HOMETOUCH for iOS 1.4.2 was discovered to be missing an SSL certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bticinon/a
Product-door_entry_for_hometouchn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-45856
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.6||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2024 | 14:37
Updated-26 Sep, 2024 | 14:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiClientWindows 6.4 all versions, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, FortiClientMac 6.4 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4, FortiClientLinux 6.4 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4, FortiClientAndroid 6.4 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 7.2.0 and FortiClientiOS 5.6 all versions, 6.0.0 through 6.0.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 SAML SSO feature may allow an unauthenticated attacker to man-in-the-middle the communication between the FortiClient and  both the service provider and the identity provider.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-forticlientFortiClientiOSFortiClientMacFortiClientWindowsFortiClientAndroidFortiClientLinux
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-26491
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.56% / 67.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 May, 2022 | 04:25
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 05:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Pidgin before 2.14.9. A remote attacker who can spoof DNS responses can redirect a client connection to a malicious server. The client will perform TLS certificate verification of the malicious domain name instead of the original XMPP service domain, allowing the attacker to take over control over the XMPP connection and to obtain user credentials and all communication content. This is similar to CVE-2022-24968.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxPidgin
Product-pidgindebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-6175
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 35.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2020 | 20:42
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Citrix SD-WAN 10.2.x before 10.2.6 and 11.0.x before 11.0.3 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCitrix (Cloud Software Group, Inc.)
Product-citrix_sd-wan_centernetscaler_sd-wan_centern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-4496
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 27.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Dec, 2021 | 18:35
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.8.x server connection to an IBM Spectrum Protect Plus workload agent is subject to a man-in-the-middle attack due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 182046.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM CorporationLinux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelspectrum_protect_plusSpectrum Protect Plus
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-3761
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenVPN Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Oct, 2023 | 12:10
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 01:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenVPN Connect versions before 3.4.0.4506 (macOS) and OpenVPN Connect before 3.4.0.3100 (Windows) allows man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept configuration profile download requests which contains the users credentials

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openvpnOpenVPN Inc
Product-connectOpenVPN Connect
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33681
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 20.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-22 May, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Hostname Verification in Java Client and Proxy can expose authentication data via MITM

Delayed TLS hostname verification in the Pulsar Java Client and the Pulsar Proxy make each client vulnerable to a man in the middle attack. Connections from the Pulsar Java Client to the Pulsar Broker/Proxy and connections from the Pulsar Proxy to the Pulsar Broker are vulnerable. Authentication data is sent before verifying the server’s TLS certificate matches the hostname, which means authentication data could be exposed to an attacker. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack by providing the client with a cryptographically valid certificate for an unrelated host. Because the client sends authentication data before performing hostname verification, an attacker could gain access to the client’s authentication data. The client eventually closes the connection when it verifies the hostname and identifies the targeted hostname does not match a hostname on the certificate. Because the client eventually closes the connection, the value of the intercepted authentication data depends on the authentication method used by the client. Token based authentication and username/password authentication methods are vulnerable because the authentication data can be used to impersonate the client in a separate session. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Java Client versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0; 2.6.4 and earlier.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33682
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 42.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-27 May, 2025 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Disabled Hostname Verification makes Brokers, Proxies vulnerable to MITM attack

TLS hostname verification cannot be enabled in the Pulsar Broker's Java Client, the Pulsar Broker's Java Admin Client, the Pulsar WebSocket Proxy's Java Client, and the Pulsar Proxy's Admin Client leaving intra-cluster connections and geo-replication connections vulnerable to man in the middle attacks, which could leak credentials, configuration data, message data, and any other data sent by these clients. The vulnerability is for both the pulsar+ssl protocol and HTTPS. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack by providing the client with a cryptographically valid certificate for an unrelated host. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Broker, Proxy, and WebSocket Proxy versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0; 2.6.4 and earlier.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33683
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-22 May, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Disabled Certificate Validation makes Broker, Proxy Admin Clients vulnerable to MITM attack

Apache Pulsar Brokers and Proxies create an internal Pulsar Admin Client that does not verify peer TLS certificates, even when tlsAllowInsecureConnection is disabled via configuration. The Pulsar Admin Client's intra-cluster and geo-replication HTTPS connections are vulnerable to man in the middle attacks, which could leak authentication data, configuration data, and any other data sent by these clients. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Broker and Proxy versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0; 2.6.4 and earlier.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-39361
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2021 | 18:46
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In GNOME evolution-rss through 0.3.96, network-soup.c does not enable TLS certificate verification on the SoupSessionSync objects it creates, leaving users vulnerable to network MITM attacks. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2016-20011.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME Project
Product-evolution-rssn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-39360
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.40% / 59.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2021 | 18:46
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In GNOME libzapojit through 0.0.3, zpj-skydrive.c does not enable TLS certificate verification on the SoupSessionSync objects it creates, leaving users vulnerable to network MITM attacks. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2016-20011.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME ProjectFedora Project
Product-fedoralibzapojitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-39359
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 50.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In GNOME libgda through 6.0.0, gda-web-provider.c does not enable TLS certificate verification on the SoupSessionSync objects it creates, leaving users vulnerable to network MITM attacks. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2016-20011.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME ProjectFedora Project
Product-fedoralibgdan/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-39358
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 44.49%
||
7 Day CHG-0.11%
Published-22 Aug, 2021 | 18:47
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In GNOME libgfbgraph through 0.2.4, gfbgraph-photo.c does not enable TLS certificate verification on the SoupSessionSync objects it creates, leaving users vulnerable to network MITM attacks. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2016-20011.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME ProjectFedora Project
Product-libgfbgraphfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-39365
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 52.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2021 | 21:18
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In GNOME grilo though 0.3.13, grl-net-wc.c does not enable TLS certificate verification on the SoupSessionAsync objects it creates, leaving users vulnerable to network MITM attacks. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2016-20011.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME ProjectDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxgrilon/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-45035
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Spanish National Cybersecurity Institute, S.A. (INCIBE)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Spanish National Cybersecurity Institute, S.A. (INCIBE)
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 37.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2022 | 15:02
Updated-22 May, 2025 | 18:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Velneo vClient Improper authentication

Velneo vClient on its 28.1.3 version, does not correctly check the certificate of authenticity by default. This could allow an attacker that has access to the network to perform a MITM attack in order to obtain the user´s credentials.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-velneoVelneo
Product-vclientVelneo vClient
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-1758
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 48.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 May, 2020 | 18:52
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 06:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in Keycloak in versions before 10.0.0, where it does not perform the TLS hostname verification while sending emails using the SMTP server. This flaw allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-keycloakopenstackkeycloak
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-15526
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 32.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jul, 2020 | 16:40
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Redgate SQL Monitor 7.1.4 through 10.1.6 (inclusive), the scope for disabling some TLS security certificate checks can extend beyond that defined by various options on the Configuration > Notifications pages to disable certificate checking for alert notifications. These TLS security checks are also ignored during monitoring of VMware machines. This would make SQL Monitor vulnerable to potential man-in-the-middle attacks when sending alert notification emails, posting to Slack or posting to webhooks. The vulnerability is fixed in version 10.1.7.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-red-gaten/a
Product-sql_monitorn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-14981
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 40.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jun, 2020 | 17:37
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The ThreatTrack VIPRE Password Vault app through 1.100.1090 for iOS has Missing SSL Certificate Validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vipren/a
Product-password_vaultn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-42017
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 25.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Mar, 2022 | 11:31
Updated-12 Aug, 2025 | 12:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100F, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200F, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969F, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400F, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416F, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PF, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900F, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GF, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPF, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GF, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488F, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. A new variant of the POODLE attack has left a third-party component vulnerable due to the implementation flaws of the CBC encryption mode in TLS 1.0 to 1.2. If an attacker were to exploit this, they could act as a man-in-the-middle and eavesdrop on encrypted communications.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-ruggedcom_rs969ruggedcom_rs910ruggedcom_rsg2100ruggedcom_rsg2300pruggedcom_rs930lruggedcom_rsg907rruggedcom_rsg910cruggedcom_rs416ruggedcom_rs900wruggedcom_i801ruggedcom_rosruggedcom_m2100ruggedcom_rmcruggedcom_i800ruggedcom_rst2228ruggedcom_rs930wruggedcom_rmc8388ruggedcom_rsg2200ruggedcom_rs900ruggedcom_rs401ruggedcom_rs8000truggedcom_rsg909rruggedcom_rp110ruggedcom_rs910lruggedcom_i802ruggedcom_m969ruggedcom_rs910wruggedcom_rsg2100pruggedcom_rs8000ruggedcom_rst916pruggedcom_rs900gpruggedcom_rs900lruggedcom_rmc40ruggedcom_rsl910ruggedcom_rmc41ruggedcom_rsg920pruggedcom_rs920wruggedcom_rs416v2ruggedcom_rs8000aruggedcom_rsg2300ruggedcom_rst916cruggedcom_m2200ruggedcom_rs400ruggedcom_rst2228pruggedcom_rmc20ruggedcom_rs8000hruggedcom_rsg908cruggedcom_i803ruggedcom_rsg2488ruggedcom_rs900gruggedcom_rsg2288ruggedcom_rs920lruggedcom_rs940gruggedcom_rmc30RUGGEDCOM RS8000RUGGEDCOM RS900LRUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS930WRUGGEDCOM RS910LRUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600RUGGEDCOM RS920WRUGGEDCOM RS940GRUGGEDCOM RS900FRUGGEDCOM M2200RUGGEDCOM RS910RUGGEDCOM RSG908CRUGGEDCOM RS900RUGGEDCOM RS400FRUGGEDCOM RS920LRUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100RUGGEDCOM RS8000HRUGGEDCOM RS400RUGGEDCOM RS8000TRUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM M969RUGGEDCOM RS416PFRUGGEDCOM RS900GRUGGEDCOM M2100FRUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XXRUGGEDCOM RS900WRUGGEDCOM RS8000ARUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.XRUGGEDCOM i803RUGGEDCOM RSG910CRUGGEDCOM RSG2300PFRUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2488FRUGGEDCOM RS969RUGGEDCOM RSG2200RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG909RRUGGEDCOM RS416RUGGEDCOM RS416FRUGGEDCOM RS900GPFRUGGEDCOM RST2228PRUGGEDCOM RSG2100PRUGGEDCOM i800RUGGEDCOM RS416PRUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XXRUGGEDCOM RST916PRUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600FRUGGEDCOM RSL910RUGGEDCOM RSG907RRUGGEDCOM RS930LRUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS910WRUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100PFRUGGEDCOM RS900GPRUGGEDCOM RST916CRUGGEDCOM RSG2100FRUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.XRUGGEDCOM i802RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS940GFRUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RST2228RUGGEDCOM RS401RUGGEDCOM RMC30RUGGEDCOM RS900GFRUGGEDCOM M2100RUGGEDCOM RSG2300FRUGGEDCOM RS1600TRUGGEDCOM M969FRUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM M2200FRUGGEDCOM RP110RUGGEDCOM RSG2200FRUGGEDCOM i801RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-358
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
CVE-2020-13614
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.58% / 67.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2020 | 22:08
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in ssl.c in Axel before 2.17.8. The TLS implementation lacks hostname verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-axel_projectn/aopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-fedoraaxelbackports_sleleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13615
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 40.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2020 | 22:08
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

lib/QoreSocket.cpp in Qore before 0.9.4.2 lacks hostname verification for X.509 certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-qoren/a
Product-qoren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13616
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.28% / 50.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2020 | 22:08
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The boost ASIO wrapper in net/asio.cpp in Pichi before 1.3.0 lacks TLS hostname verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pichi_projectn/a
Product-pichin/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13254
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-10.76% / 93.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jun, 2020 | 13:11
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxCanonical Ltd.DjangoNetApp, Inc.Oracle CorporationFedora Project
Product-ubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxfedorazfs_storage_appliance_kitdjangosra_pluginsteelstore_cloud_integrated_storagen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-20385
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 14.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Oct, 2024 | 16:52
Updated-08 Oct, 2024 | 14:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Orchestrator SSL Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the SSL/TLS implementation of Cisco Nexus Dashboard Orchestrator (NDO) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to intercept sensitive information from an affected device.  This vulnerability exists because the Cisco NDO Validate Peer Certificate site management feature validates the certificates for Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC), Cisco Cloud Network Controller (CNC), and Cisco Nexus Dashboard only when a new site is added or an existing one is reregistered. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using machine-in-the-middle techniques to intercept the traffic between the affected device and Cisco NDO and then using a crafted certificate to impersonate the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to learn sensitive information during communications between these devices.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-nexus_dashboard_orchestratorCisco Nexus Dashboard Orchestrator
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-36005
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.02% / 4.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Jul, 2025 | 14:52
Updated-22 Aug, 2025 | 18:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM MQ Operator information disclosure

IBM MQ Operator LTS 2.0.0 through 2.0.29, MQ Operator CD 3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.1.0 through 3.1.3, 3.3.0, 3.4.0, 3.4.1, 3.5.0, 3.5.1, 3.6.0, and MQ Operator SC2 3.2.0 through 3.2.13 Internet Pass-Thru could allow a malicious user to obtain sensitive information from another TLS session connection by the proxy to the same hostname and port due to improper certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-supplied_mq_advanced_container_imagesmq_operatorMQ Operator
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-40713
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 47.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2021 | 15:43
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Adobe Experience Manager Improper Certificate Validation Could Lead to Man In The Middle Attack

Adobe Experience Manager version 6.5.9.0 (and earlier) is affected by a improper certificate validation vulnerability in the cold storage component. If an attacker can achieve a man in the middle when the cold server establishes a new certificate, they would be able to harvest sensitive information.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Adobe Inc.
Product-experience_managerExperience Manager
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-18568
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 33.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Oct, 2018 | 22:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 11:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Polycom VVX 500 and 601 devices 5.8.0.12848 and earlier allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive credential information by leveraging failure to validate X.509 certificates when used with an on-premise installation with Skype for Business.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-polycomn/a
Product-vvx_500_firmwarevvx_601vvx_500unified_communications_softwarevvx_601_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-33757
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 19.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Jan, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-20 Jun, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A lack of SSL certificate validation in Splicecom iPCS (iOS App) v1.3.4, iPCS2 (iOS App) v2.8 and before, and iPCS (Android App) v1.8.5 and before allows attackers to eavesdrop on communications via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-splicecomn/a
Product-ipcsipcs2n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-32407
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 May, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-12 Jun, 2025 | 16:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Samsung Internet for Galaxy Watch version 5.0.9, available up until Samsung Galaxy Watch 3, does not properly validate TLS certificates, allowing for an attacker to impersonate any and all websites visited by the user. This is a critical misconfiguration in the way the browser validates the identity of the server. It negates the use of HTTPS as a secure channel, allowing for Man-in-the-Middle attacks, stealing sensitive information or modifying incoming and outgoing traffic. NOTE: This vulnerability is in an end-of-life product that is no longer maintained by the vendor.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSamsung
Product-internetn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-11087
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.52% / 65.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Sep, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-27 Mar, 2025 | 19:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
TLS validation error

Pivotal Spring AMQP, 1.x versions prior to 1.7.10 and 2.x versions prior to 2.0.6, expose a man-in-the-middle vulnerability due to lack of hostname validation. A malicious user that has the ability to intercept traffic would be able to view data in transit.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-VMware (Broadcom Inc.)
Product-rabbitmq_java_clientspring_advanced_message_queuing_protocolSpring AMQP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-22367
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Feb, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-21 Mar, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Ichiran App for iOS versions prior to 3.1.0 and Ichiran App for Android versions prior to 3.1.0 improperly verify server certificates, which may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to eavesdrop on an encrypted communication via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ichiranusaBetrend Corporation and ICHIRAN INC.
Product-ichiranIchiran App for iOS and Ichiran App for Android
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-5538
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Oct, 2019 | 15:52
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Sensitive information disclosure vulnerability resulting from a lack of certificate validation during the File-Based Backup and Restore operations of VMware vCenter Server Appliance (6.7 before 6.7u3a and 6.5 before 6.5u3d) may allow a malicious actor to intercept sensitive data in transit over SCP. A malicious actor with man-in-the-middle positioning between vCenter Server Appliance and a backup target may be able to intercept sensitive data in transit during File-Based Backup and Restore operations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aVMware (Broadcom Inc.)
Product-vcenter_serverVMware vCenter Server Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-10819
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 33.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Aug, 2017 | 16:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

MaLion for Mac 4.3.0 to 5.2.1 does not properly validate certificates, which may allow an attacker to eavesdrop on an encrypted communication.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-intercomIntercom, Inc.
Product-malionMaLion for Mac
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-5102
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 44.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Nov, 2019 | 17:59
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 19:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An exploitable information leak vulnerability exists in the ustream-ssl library of OpenWrt, versions 18.06.4 and 15.05.1. When connecting to a remote server, the server's SSL certificate is checked but no action is taken when the certificate is invalid. An attacker could exploit this behavior by performing a man-in-the-middle attack, providing any certificate, leading to the theft of all the data sent by the client during the first request.An exploitable information leak vulnerability exists in the ustream-ssl library of OpenWrt, versions 18.06.4 and 15.05.1. When connecting to a remote server, the server's SSL certificate is checked but no action is taken when the certificate is invalid. An attacker could exploit this behavior by performing a man-in-the-middle attack, providing any certificate, leading to the theft of all the data sent by the client during the first request.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenWrt
Product-openwrtOpenWRT
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-9591
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jun, 2017 | 12:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The "PCB Mobile" by Phelps County Bank app 3.0.2 -- aka pcb-mobile/id436891295 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mypcbn/a
Product-pcb_mobilen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found