The RFC enabled function module allows a low privileged user to perform various actions, such as modifying the URLs of any user's favourite nodes and workbook ID. There is low impact on integrity and availability of the application.

Due to lack of proper authorization checks when calling user, a function module in obsolete Tobin interface in SAP Production and Revenue Accounting allows unauthorized access that could lead to disclosure of highly sensitive data. There is no impact on integrity or availability.

An authenticated attacker with high privilege can use functions of SLCM transactions to which access should be restricted. This may result in an escalation of privileges causing low impact on integrity of the application.

The RFC enabled function module allows a low privileged user to add any workbook to any user's workplace favourites. This vulnerability could be utilized to identify usernames and access information about targeted user's workplaces. There is low impact on integrity of the application.

The RFC enabled function module allows a low privileged user to add URLs to any user's workplace favourites. This vulnerability could be utilized to identify usernames and access information about targeted user's workplaces, and nodes. There is low impact on integrity of the application

Due to missing authorization check in SAP for Oil & Gas (Transportation and Distribution), an attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user could call a remote-enabled function which will allow them to delete non-sensitive entries in a user data table. There is no effect on confidentiality or availability.

SAP ERP Financial Accounting (RFOPENPOSTING_FR) versions - SAP_APPL - 600, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 616, SAP_FIN - 617, 618, 700, 720, 730, SAPSCORE - 125, S4CORE, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, allows a registered attacker to invoke certain functions that would otherwise be restricted to specific users. These functions are normally exposed over the network and once exploited the attacker may be able to view and modify financial accounting data that only a specific user should have access to.

In SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform, if Single Signed On is enabled on Enterprise authentication, an unauthorized user can get a logon token using a REST endpoint. The attacker can fully compromise the system resulting in High impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability.

SAP Shared Service Framework does not perform necessary authorization check for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. On successful exploitation, an attacker can cause a high impact on confidentiality of the application.

SAP shared service framework allows an authenticated non-administrative user to call a remote-enabled function, which will allow them to insert value entries into a non-sensitive table, causing low impact on integrity of the application

Statutory Reporting for Insurance Companies in SAP ERP (EA-FINSERV versions - 600, 603, 604, 605, 606, 616, 617, 618, 800 and S4CORE versions 101, 102, 103, 104) does not execute the required authorization checks for an authenticated user, allowing an attacker to view and tamper with certain restricted data leading to Missing Authorization Check.

Due to missing authorization check, SAP NetWeaver Application Server for ABAP and ABAP Platform allows an attacker logged in as a developer to read objects contained in a package. This causes an impact on confidentiality, as this attacker would otherwise not have access to view these objects.

Manage Bank Statement ReProcessing Rules does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can delete rules of other users affecting the integrity of the application. Confidentiality and Availability are not affected.

SAP S/4HANA Finance (Advanced Payment Management) does not perform necessary authorization check for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. As a result, it has a low impact to confidentiality and availability but there is no impact on the integrity.

SAP BW/4HANA Transformation and Data Transfer Process (DTP) allows an authenticated attacker to gain higher access levels than they should have by exploiting improper authorization checks. This results in escalation of privileges. It has no impact on the confidentiality of data but may have low impacts on the integrity and availability of the application.

A missing authority check in SAP CRM, versions - 700, 701, 702, 712, 713, 714, could be leveraged by an attacker with high privileges to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the system.

SAP NetWeaver Guided Procedures (Administration Workset), versions - 7.10, 7.20, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. The impact of missing authorization could result to abuse of functionality restricted to a particular user group, and could allow unauthorized users to read, modify or delete restricted data.

The Service Layer of SAP Business One, version - 10.0, allows an authenticated attacker to invoke certain functions that would otherwise be restricted to specific users. For an attacker to discover the vulnerable function, no in-depth system knowledge is required. Once exploited via Network stack, the attacker may be able to read, modify or delete restricted data. The impact is that missing authorization can result of abuse of functionality usually restricted to specific users.

SAP Student Life Cycle Management (SLcM) fails to conduct proper authorization checks for authenticated users, leading to the potential escalation of privileges. On successful exploitation it could allow an attacker to access and edit non-sensitive report variants that are typically restricted, causing minimal impact on the confidentiality and integrity of the application.

Manage Incoming Payment Files (F1680) of SAP S/4HANA does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. As a result, it has high impact on integrity and no impact on the confidentiality and availability of the system.

SAP My Travel Requests does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. On successful exploitation, the attacker can upload a malicious attachment to a business trip request which will lead to a low impact on the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application. 

Due to the missing authorization checks in the local systems, the admin users of SAP Web Dispatcher, SAP NetWeaver Application Server (ABAP and Java), and SAP Content Server can impersonate other users and may perform some unintended actions. This could lead to a low impact on confidentiality and a high impact on the integrity and availability of the applications.

Manage Bank Statement ReProcessing Rules does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can enable/disable the sharing rule of other users affecting the integrity of the application. Confidentiality and Availability are not affected.

SAP Enable Now Manager does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. On successful exploitation, the attacker with the role 'Learner' could gain access to other user's data in manager which will lead to a high impact to the confidentiality of the application.

SAP Focused RUN versions 200, 300, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, which allows a user to call the oData service and manipulate the activation for the SAP EarlyWatch Alert service data collection and sending to SAP without the intended authorization.

Cash Management in SAP S/4 HANA does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. By exploiting this vulnerability, attacker can add notes in the review request with 'completed' status affecting the integrity of the application. Confidentiality and Availability are not impacted.

Cash Management in SAP S/4 HANA does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can approve or reject a bank account application affecting the integrity of the application. Confidentiality and Availability are not impacted.

Due to missing authorization check, attacker with business user account in SAP ABAP Platform - version 758, 795, can change the privacy setting of job templates from shared to private. As a result, the selected template would only be accessible to the owner.

SAP Group Reporting Data Collection does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. On successful exploitation, specific data can be changed via the Enter Package Data app although the user does not have sufficient authorization causing high impact on Integrity of the appliction.

SAP GRC Access Control - versions V1100_700, V1100_731, V1200_750, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, which could lead to escalation of privileges.

SAP Bank Account Management (BAM) allows an authenticated user with restricted access to use functions which can result in escalation of privileges with low impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application.

The RFC enabled function module allows a low privileged user to perform denial of service on any user and also change or delete favourite nodes. By sending a crafted packet in the function module targeting specific parameters, the specific targeted user will no longer have access to any functionality of SAP GUI. There is low impact on integrity and availability of the application.

S/4HANA Manage (Withholding Tax Items) - version 106, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges which has low impact on the confidentiality and integrity of the application.

S4CORE (Manage Purchase Contracts App) - versions 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user. This could allow an attacker to perform unintended actions resulting in escalation of privileges which has low impact on confidentiality and integrity with no impact on availibility of the system.

Due to missing authorization check in SAP NetWeaver AS Java (System Landscape Directory) an unauthorized user can read and modify some restricted global SLD configurations causing low impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application.

SAP Host Agent, version 7.21, allows an unprivileged user to read the shared memory or write to the shared memory by sending request to the main SAPOSCOL process and receive responses that may contain data read with user root privileges e.g. size of any directory, system hardware and OS details, leading to Missing Authorization Check vulnerability.

SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP (Banking Services), versions - 710, 711, 740, 750, 751, 752, 75A, 75B, 75C, 75D, 75E, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user due to Missing Authorization Check, allowing wrong and unexpected change of individual conditions by a malicious user leading to wrong prices.

SAP ERP (HCM Travel Management), versions - 600, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, allows an authenticated but unauthorized attacker to read, modify and settle trips, resulting in escalation of privileges, due to Missing Authorization Check.

A missing authorization check allows an arbitrary authenticated user to perform certain operations through the API of CLA-assistant by executing specific additional steps. This allows an arbitrary authenticated user to read CLA information including information of the persons who signed them as well as custom fields the CLA requester had configured. In addition, an arbitrary authenticated user can update or delete the CLA-configuration for repositories or organizations using CLA-assistant. The stored access tokens for GitHub are not affected, as these are redacted from the API-responses.

SAP S/4 HANA (Financial Products Subledger and Banking Services), versions - FSAPPL 400, 450, 500 and S4FPSL 100, allows an authenticated user to run an analysis report due to Missing Authorization Check, resulting in slowing the system.

The SAP BW BICS communication layer in SAP Business Warehouse and SAP BW/4HANA - version SAP_BW 730, SAP_BW 731, SAP_BW 740, SAP_BW 730, SAP_BW 750, DW4CORE 100, DW4CORE 200, DW4CORE 300, may expose unauthorized cell values to the data response. To be able to exploit this, the user still needs authorizations on the query as well as on the keyfigure/measure level. The missing check only affects the data level.

Vendor Master Hierarchy - versions SAP_APPL 500, SAP_APPL 600, SAP_APPL 602, SAP_APPL 603, SAP_APPL 604, SAP_APPL 605, SAP_APPL 606, SAP_APPL 616, SAP_APPL 617, SAP_APPL 618, S4CORE 100, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user to access some of its function. This could lead to modification of data impacting the integrity of the system.

Missing authorization check in a transaction within SAP Leasing (update provided in SAP_APPL 6.18, EA-APPL 6.0, 6.02, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16 and 6.17).

Elements of PDCE does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This allows an attacker to read sensitive information causing high impact on the confidentiality of the application.

SAP Identity Management, version 8.0, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, allowing the attacker to view certain sensitive information of the victim, leading to Missing Authorization Check.

Customizing functionality of SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP Platform (fixed in versions from 7.0 to 7.02, from 7.10 to 7.11, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, from 7.50 to 7.53, from 7.74 to 7.75) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

SAP Treasury and Risk Management (EA-FINSERV 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18 and 8.0; S4CORE 1.01, 1.02 and 1.03), does not perform necessary authorization checks for authorization objects T_DEAL_DP and T_DEAL_PD , resulting in escalation of privileges.

ABAP Server of SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform fail to perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This has been corrected in the following versions: KRNL32NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL32UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL64NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.74, KRNL64UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.73, 7.74, 8.04, KERNEL 7.21, 7.45, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, 7.74, 7.75, 8.04.

Order processing in SAP ERP Sales (corrected in SAP_APPL 6.0, 6.02, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18) and S4HANA Sales (corrected in S4CORE 1.0, 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04) does not execute the required authorization checks for an authenticated user, which can result in an escalation of privileges.

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (B2B Toolkit), before versions 1.0 and 2.0, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, allowing the import of B2B table content that leads to Missing Authorization Check.