In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07 privilege escalation was possible due to incorrect directory permissions

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2023.1 in some cases, Gradle and Maven projects could be imported without the “Trust Project” confirmation.

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2023.2 plugin for Space was requesting excessive permissions

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2022.3.1 code Templates were vulnerable to SSTI attacks.

In JetBrains Toolbox App before 1.28 a DYLIB injection on macOS was possible

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2022.3 a DYLIB injection on macOS was possible.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07.1 privilege escalation was possible due to incorrect directory ownership

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2022.2.4 a buffer overflow in the fsnotifier daemon on macOS was possible.

In JetBrains PyCharm before 2020.3.4, local code execution was possible because of insufficient checks when getting the project from VCS.

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA 2020.3.3, local code execution was possible because of insufficient checks when getting the project from VCS.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2023.11 users with access to the agent machine might obtain permissions of the user running the agent process

In JetBrains Rider before 2022.2 Trust and Open Project dialog could be bypassed, leading to local code execution

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2022.2 local code execution via a Vagrant executable was possible

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2021.3.1, local code execution via RLO (Right-to-Left Override) characters was possible.

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2021.2.4, local code execution (without permission from a user) upon opening a project was possible.

JetBrains Rider before 2019.1.2 was using an unsigned JetBrains.Rider.Unity.Editor.Plugin.Repacked.dll file.

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2020.3, potentially insecure deserialization of the workspace model could lead to local code execution.

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.4.4701, an attacker could enumerate users via the REST API without appropriate permissions.

In JetBrains Kotlin before 1.4.21, a vulnerable Java API was used for temporary file and folder creation. An attacker was able to read data from such files and list directories due to insecure permissions.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.2, health items of pull requests were shown to users who lacked appropriate permissions.

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2021.4.31698, a custom logo could be set by a user who has read-only permissions.

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.6881, a user without permission is able to create an article draft.

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.1.659, DB export was accessible to read-only administrators.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2019.2.1, a user without appropriate permissions was able to import settings from the settings.kts file.

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2019.2.55152, removing tags from the issues list without the corresponding permission was possible.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.1.2, permission checks in the Create Patch functionality are insufficient.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2019.1.2, secure values could be exposed to users with the "View build runtime parameters and data" permission.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2019.1.2, a non-destructive operation could be performed by a user without the corresponding permissions.

In multiple functions of Parcel.cpp, there is a possible way to bypass address space layout randomization. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In createPhonebookDialogView and createMapDialogView of BluetoothPermissionActivity.java, there is a possible permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege due to hiding and bypassing the user's ability to disable access to contacts, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

Improper permissions in the Intel(R) Dynamic Platform and Thermal Framework v8.3.10208.5643 and before may allow an authenticated user to potentially execute code at an elevated level of privilege.

dnskeygen in BIND 8.2.4 and earlier, and dnssec-keygen in BIND 9.1.2 and earlier, set insecure permissions for a HMAC-MD5 shared secret key file used for DNS Transactional Signatures (TSIG), which allows attackers to obtain the keys and perform dynamic DNS updates.

In many locations, there is a possible way to access kernel memory in user space due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Incorrect default permissions in some Intel(R) GPA software installers before version 2023.3 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

In bootloader there is fastboot command allowing user specified kernel command line arguments. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

Sequence of processor instructions leads to unexpected behavior for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege and/or information disclosure and/or denial of service via local access.

In OSUInfo of OSUInfo.java, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Incorrect default permissions in the Intel(R) SCS Add-on software installer for Microsoft SCCM all versions may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

In onCreate of UsbAccessoryUriActivity.java, there is a possible way to escape the Setup Wizard due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-246542917

In various functions of AppStandbyController.java, there is a possible way to break manageability scenarios due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-272042183

In onNullBinding of CallRedirectionProcessor.java, there is a possible long lived connection due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege and background activity launches with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-273260090

In retrieveAppEntry of NotificationAccessDetails.java, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege across user boundaries with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-259385017

In bindOutputSwitcherAndBroadcastButton of MediaControlPanel.java, there is a possible launch arbitrary activity under SysUI due to Unsafe Intent. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-271846393

Improper access control vulnerability in Galaxy Store prior to version 4.5.49.8 allows local attackers to install applications from Galaxy Store.

Incorrect default permissions in the AMD Management Plugin for the Microsoft® System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM) installation directory could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalation, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution.

In onResume of AppManagementFragment.java, there is a possible way to prevent users from forgetting a previously connected VPN due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-12Android ID: A-205460459

In restorePermissionState of PermissionManagerServiceImpl.java, there is a possible way for an app to keep permissions that should be revoked due to incorrect permission flags cleared during an update. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In onCreate of DataUsageSummary.java, there is a possible method for a guest user to enable or disable mobile data due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-262243574

In bindPlayer of MediaControlPanel.java, there is a possible launch arbitrary activity in SysUI due to Unsafe Intent. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-271845008

A vulnerability in the client update process of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client Software for Windows and Cisco Secure Client Software for Windows could allow a low-privileged, authenticated, local attacker to elevate privileges to those of SYSTEM. The client update process is executed after a successful VPN connection is established. This vulnerability exists because improper permissions are assigned to a temporary directory that is created during the update process. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by abusing a specific function of the Windows installer process. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute code with SYSTEM privileges.