SSRF in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.8 and Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.5 allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin rights to access internal network services.

A server-side request forgery in PAN-OS software enables an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to use the administrative web interface as a proxy, which enables the attacker to view internal network resources not otherwise accessible.

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect QuLog Center. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers who have gained administrator access to read application data. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QuLog Center 1.7.0.829 ( 2024/10/01 ) and later QuLog Center 1.8.0.888 ( 2024/10/15 ) and later QTS 4.5.4.2957 build 20241119 and later QuTS hero h4.5.4.2956 build 20241119 and later

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Gabe Livan Asset CleanUp: Page Speed Booster wp-asset-clean-up allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Asset CleanUp: Page Speed Booster: from n/a through <= 1.3.9.8.

Strapi is an open-source content management system. Prior to version 4.25.2, inputting a local domain into the Webhooks URL field leads to the application fetching itself, resulting in a server side request forgery (SSRF). This issue has been patched in version 4.25.2.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Nks Responsive Filterable Portfolio responsive-filterable-portfolio allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Responsive Filterable Portfolio: from n/a through <= 1.0.22.

The Ona theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.26 via the ona_activate_child_theme. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

A remote authenticated server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version(s): 6.10.4 and below, 6.9.9 and below, 6.8.9-HF2 and below, 6.7.x and below. Aruba has released updates to ClearPass Policy Manage that address this security vulnerability.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress WP Pipes allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Pipes: from n/a through 1.4.2.

An issue was found in mipjz 5.0.5. In the mipPost method of \app\setting\controller\ApiAdminTool.php, the value of the postAddress parameter is not processed and is directly passed into curl_exec execution and output, resulting in a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that can read server files.

An issue was discovered in mipjz 5.0.5. In the push method of app\tag\controller\ApiAdminTag.php the value of the postAddress parameter is not processed and is directly passed into curl_exec execution and output, resulting in Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that can read server files.

The Total Upkeep – WordPress Backup Plugin plus Restore & Migrate by BoldGrid plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.16.8 via the 'download' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Antabot White-Jotter up to 0.2.2. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/content/editor of the component Article Editor. The manipulation of the argument articleCover leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

A malicious actor who has been authenticated and granted specific permissions in Apache Superset may use the import dataset feature in order to conduct Server-Side Request Forgery attacks and query internal resources on behalf of the server where Superset is deployed. This vulnerability exists in Apache Superset versions up to and including 2.0.1.

The Task Scheduler plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.3 via the “Check Website” task. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository omeka/omeka-s prior to 4.0.2.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Craig Hewitt Seriously Simple Podcasting seriously-simple-podcasting allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Seriously Simple Podcasting: from n/a through <= 3.14.1.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Andy Moyle Church Admin.This issue affects Church Admin: from n/a through 3.7.56.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Dimitar Ivanov HTTP Headers.This issue affects HTTP Headers: from n/a through 1.18.11.

Flarum is open-source forum software. Prior to versions 1.8.16 and 2.0.0-rc.1, Flarum's patch for CVE-2023-27577 restricted the @import and data-uri() LESS features in the custom_less setting, but the same restriction was never applied to other settings registered as LESS config variables (for example theme_primary_color and theme_secondary_color, as well as any key registered via Extend\Settings::registerLessConfigVar()). Those values are interpolated verbatim into the LESS source at compile time, allowing an authenticated administrator to craft a theme-color value that injects an arbitrary @import directive into the compiled forum.css. Because the underlying LESS parser honours @import (inline) '<path>', an attacker can read arbitrary files reachable by the PHP process (local file inclusion) or trigger outbound HTTP(S) requests (server-side request forgery). This issue has been patched in versions 1.8.16 and 2.0.0-rc.1.

Kargo manages and automates the promotion of software artifacts. In versions 1.4.0 through 1.6.3, 1.7.0-rc.1 through 1.7.8, 1.8.0-rc.1 through 1.8.11, and 1.9.0-rc.1 through 1.9.4, the http and http-download promotion steps allow Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) against link-local addresses, most critically the cloud instance metadata endpoint (169.254.169.254), enabling exfiltration of sensitive data such as IAM credentials. These steps provide full control over request headers and methods, rendering cloud provider header-based SSRF mitigations ineffective. An authenticated attacker with permissions to create/update Stages or craft Promotion resources can exploit this by submitting a malicious Promotion manifest, with response data retrievable via Promotion status fields, Git repositories, or a second http step. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.6.4, 1.7.9, 1.8.12 and 1.9.5.

Xibo is an open source digital signage platform with a web content management system and Windows display player software. An authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in versions prior to 4.4.1 allows users with DataSet permissions to make arbitrary HTTP requests from the CMS server to internal or external network resources. This can be exploited to scan internal infrastructure, access local cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., AWS IMDS), interact with internal services that lack authentication, or exfiltrate data. Exploitation of the vulnerability is possible on behalf of an authorized user who has both of the following privileges, which are not granted to non-admins as standard: Include "Add DataSet" button to allow for additional DataSets to be created independently to Layouts. Users should upgrade to version 4.4.1 which fixes this issue. Upgrading to a fixed version is necessary to remediate. Users unable to upgrade should revoke such privileges from users they do not trust.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Poll Maker Team Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin.This issue affects Poll Maker – Best WordPress Poll Plugin: from n/a through 4.6.2.

Group-Office is an enterprise customer relationship management and groupware tool. Prior to versions 6.8.150, 25.0.82, and 26.0.5, an authenticated user within the System Administrator group can trigger a full SSRF via the WOPI service discovery URL, including access to internal hosts/ports. The SSRF response body can be exfiltrated via the built‑in debug system, turning it into a visible SSRF. This also allows full server-side file read. This issue has been patched in versions 6.8.150, 25.0.82, and 26.0.5.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in totalsoft TS Poll poll-wp allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects TS Poll: from n/a through <= 2.5.5.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPChill Download Monitor.This issue affects Download Monitor: from n/a through 4.8.1.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.6 (and earlier), 2.4.5-p2 (and earlier) and 2.4.4-p3 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An admin-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.6 (and earlier), 2.4.5-p2 (and earlier) and 2.4.4-p3 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An admin-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in CONPROSYS HMI System (CHS) versions prior to 3.5.3. A user who can access the affected product with an administrative privilege may bypass the database restriction set on the query setting page, and connect to a user unintended database.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An admin-privilege authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Wappointment Appointment Bookings for Zoom GoogleMeet and more – Wappointment.This issue affects Appointment Bookings for Zoom GoogleMeet and more – Wappointment: from n/a through 2.6.0.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPGraphQL.This issue affects WPGraphQL: from n/a through 1.14.5.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Blossom Themes BlossomThemes Email Newsletter.This issue affects BlossomThemes Email Newsletter: from n/a through 2.2.6.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPManageNinja LLC Ninja Tables.This issue affects Ninja Tables: from n/a through 5.0.9.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ShortPixel ShortPixel Adaptive Images shortpixel-adaptive-images.This issue affects ShortPixel Adaptive Images: from n/a through <= 3.8.3.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Pratik Ghela MakeStories (for Google Web Stories) makestories-helper allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects MakeStories (for Google Web Stories): from n/a through <= 3.0.4.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in solacewp Solace Extra solace-extra allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Solace Extra: from n/a through <= 1.3.2.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Skimlinks Skimlinks Affiliate Marketing Tool skimlinks allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Skimlinks Affiliate Marketing Tool: from n/a through <= 1.3.1.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in gfazioli WP Bannerize Pro wp-bannerize-pro allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Bannerize Pro: from n/a through <= 1.10.0.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Binsaifullah Beaf image-compare-block allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Beaf: from n/a through <= 1.6.2.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in activewebsight SEO Backlink Monitor seo-backlink-monitor allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects SEO Backlink Monitor: from n/a through <= 1.8.0.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Icegram Icegram Express Pro email-subscribers-premium allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Icegram Express Pro: from n/a through <= 5.9.5.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Kerfred FG Drupal to WordPress fg-drupal-to-wp allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects FG Drupal to WordPress: from n/a through <= 3.90.0.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WP Royal Royal Elementor Addons royal-elementor-addons allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Royal Elementor Addons: from n/a through <= 1.7.1006.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Ronald Huereca Comment Edit Core – Simple Comment Editing simple-comment-editing allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Comment Edit Core – Simple Comment Editing: from n/a through <= 3.0.33.

A weakness has been identified in ZenTao up to 21.7.6-85642. The impacted element is the function fetchHook of the file module/webhook/model.php of the component Webhook Module. This manipulation causes server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

A vulnerability was found in kalcaddle kodbox 1.61. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /?explorer/upload/serverDownload of the component Download from Link Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

The Emplibot – AI Content Writer with Keyword Research, Infographics, and Linking | SEO Optimized | Fully Automated plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.9 via the emplibot_call_webhook_with_error() and emplibot_process_zip_data() functions. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in yuan1994 tpAdmin 1.3.12. Affected is the function remote of the file application\admin\controller\Upload.php. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-225408. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

Discourse is a platform for community discussion. A malicious admin could use this vulnerability to perform port enumeration on the local host or other hosts on the internal network, as well as against hosts on the Internet. Latest `stable`, `beta`, and `test-passed` versions are now patched. As a workaround, self-hosters can use `DISCOURSE_BLOCKED_IP_BLOCKS` env var (which overrides `blocked_ip_blocks` setting) to stop webhooks from accessing private IPs.