Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2025-27820

Summary
Assigner-apache
Assigner Org ID-f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09
Published At-24 Apr, 2025 | 11:44
Updated At-04 Jun, 2025 | 11:20
Rejected At-
Credits

Apache HttpComponents: PSL (Public Suffix List) validation bypass

A bug in PSL validation logic in Apache HttpClient 5.4.x disables domain checks, affecting cookie management and host name verification. Discovered by the Apache HttpClient team. Fixed in the 5.4.3 release

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:apache
Assigner Org ID:f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09
Published At:24 Apr, 2025 | 11:44
Updated At:04 Jun, 2025 | 11:20
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Apache HttpComponents: PSL (Public Suffix List) validation bypass

A bug in PSL validation logic in Apache HttpClient 5.4.x disables domain checks, affecting cookie management and host name verification. Discovered by the Apache HttpClient team. Fixed in the 5.4.3 release

Affected Products
Vendor
The Apache Software FoundationApache Software Foundation
Product
Apache HttpComponents
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 5.4.0 before 5.4.3 (semver)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
N/AN/APSL Validation Bypass in Apache HttpClient 5.4.x
Type: N/A
CWE ID: N/A
Description: PSL Validation Bypass in Apache HttpClient 5.4.x
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Textual description of severity
text:
moderate
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

remediation developer
Joe Gallo
Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/574
patch
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/621
patch
https://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-5.4.x/index.html
product
https://lists.apache.org/thread/55xhs40ncqv97qvoocok44995xp5kqn8
vendor-advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/574
Resource:
patch
Hyperlink: https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/621
Resource:
patch
Hyperlink: https://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-5.4.x/index.html
Resource:
product
Hyperlink: https://lists.apache.org/thread/55xhs40ncqv97qvoocok44995xp5kqn8
Resource:
vendor-advisory
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-295CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-295
Description: CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
2. CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250516-0003/
N/A
Hyperlink: https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250516-0003/
Resource: N/A
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security@apache.org
Published At:24 Apr, 2025 | 12:15
Updated At:16 May, 2025 | 23:15

A bug in PSL validation logic in Apache HttpClient 5.4.x disables domain checks, affecting cookie management and host name verification. Discovered by the Apache HttpClient team. Fixed in the 5.4.3 release

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CPE Matches

Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Secondary134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Secondary
Source: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/574security@apache.org
N/A
https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/621security@apache.org
N/A
https://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-5.4.x/index.htmlsecurity@apache.org
N/A
https://lists.apache.org/thread/55xhs40ncqv97qvoocok44995xp5kqn8security@apache.org
N/A
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250516-0003/af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/574
Source: security@apache.org
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/621
Source: security@apache.org
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-5.4.x/index.html
Source: security@apache.org
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://lists.apache.org/thread/55xhs40ncqv97qvoocok44995xp5kqn8
Source: security@apache.org
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250516-0003/
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

141Records found

CVE-2021-26558
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-2.81% / 85.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Nov, 2021 | 09:35
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Deserialization of Untrusted Data

Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability of Apache ShardingSphere-UI allows an attacker to inject outer link resources. This issue affects Apache ShardingSphere-UI Apache ShardingSphere-UI version 4.1.1 and later versions; Apache ShardingSphere-UI versions prior to 5.0.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-shardingsphere-uiApache ShardingSphere-UI
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CVE-2021-27738
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-2.43% / 84.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jan, 2022 | 12:35
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 21:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Access Control to Streaming Coordinator & SSRF

All request mappings in `StreamingCoordinatorController.java` handling `/kylin/api/streaming_coordinator/*` REST API endpoints did not include any security checks, which allowed an unauthenticated user to issue arbitrary requests, such as assigning/unassigning of streaming cubes, creation/modification and deletion of replica sets, to the Kylin Coordinator. For endpoints accepting node details in HTTP message body, unauthenticated (but limited) server-side request forgery (SSRF) can be achieved. This issue affects Apache Kylin Apache Kylin 3 versions prior to 3.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-kylinApache Kylin
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CVE-2024-42516
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.43% / 61.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2025 | 16:53
Updated-29 Jul, 2025 | 15:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache HTTP Server: HTTP response splitting

HTTP response splitting in the core of Apache HTTP Server allows an attacker who can manipulate the Content-Type response headers of applications hosted or proxied by the server can split the HTTP response. This vulnerability was described as CVE-2023-38709 but the patch included in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.59 did not address the issue. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.64, which fixes this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-http_serverApache HTTP Server
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-53868
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.33% / 55.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2025 | 08:59
Updated-29 Apr, 2025 | 20:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Traffic Server: Malformed chunked message body allows request smuggling

Apache Traffic Server allows request smuggling if chunked messages are malformed.  This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 9.2.0 through 9.2.9, from 10.0.0 through 10.0.4. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.2.10 or 10.0.5, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-traffic_serverApache Traffic Server
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2022-42252
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.17%
||
7 Day CHG-0.03%
Published-01 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-06 May, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Tomcat request smuggling via malformed content-length

If Apache Tomcat 8.5.0 to 8.5.82, 9.0.0-M1 to 9.0.67, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.26 or 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0 was configured to ignore invalid HTTP headers via setting rejectIllegalHeader to false (the default for 8.5.x only), Tomcat did not reject a request containing an invalid Content-Length header making a request smuggling attack possible if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that also failed to reject the request with the invalid header.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-tomcatApache Tomcat
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2025-54813
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 35.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2025 | 18:45
Updated-26 Aug, 2025 | 21:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Log4cxx: Improper escaping with JSONLayout

Improper Output Neutralization for Logs vulnerability in Apache Log4cxx. When using JSONLayout, not all payload bytes are properly escaped. If an attacker-supplied message contains certain non-printable characters, these will be passed along in the message and written out as part of the JSON message. This may prevent applications that consume these logs from correctly interpreting the information within them. This issue affects Apache Log4cxx: before 1.5.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.5.0, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-log4cxxApache Log4cxx
CWE ID-CWE-117
Improper Output Neutralization for Logs
CVE-2022-37866
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.60% / 68.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-01 May, 2025 | 20:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Ivy allows path traversal in the presence of a malicious repository

When Apache Ivy downloads artifacts from a repository it stores them in the local file system based on a user-supplied "pattern" that may include placeholders for artifacts coordinates like the organisation, module or version. If said coordinates contain "../" sequences - which are valid characters for Ivy coordinates in general - it is possible the artifacts are stored outside of Ivy's local cache or repository or can overwrite different artifacts inside of the local cache. In order to exploit this vulnerability an attacker needs collaboration by the remote repository as Ivy will issue http requests containing ".." sequences and a "normal" repository will not interpret them as part of the artifact coordinates. Users of Apache Ivy 2.0.0 to 2.5.1 should upgrade to Ivy 2.5.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-ivyApache Ivy
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2024-27139
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.42% / 61.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Mar, 2024 | 15:40
Updated-28 May, 2025 | 19:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Archiva: incorrect authentication potentially leading to account takeover

** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache Archiva: a vulnerability in Apache Archiva allows an unauthenticated attacker to modify account data, potentially leading to account takeover. This issue affects Apache Archiva: from 2.0.0. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative or restrict access to the instance to trusted users. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-apache_software_foundationThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-archivaApache Archivaapache_archiva
CWE ID-CWE-863
Incorrect Authorization
CVE-2020-17518
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-93.18% / 99.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Jan, 2021 | 11:40
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 16:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Flink directory traversal attack: remote file writing through the REST API

Apache Flink 1.5.1 introduced a REST handler that allows you to write an uploaded file to an arbitrary location on the local file system, through a maliciously modified HTTP HEADER. The files can be written to any location accessible by Flink 1.5.1. All users should upgrade to Flink 1.11.3 or 1.12.0 if their Flink instance(s) are exposed. The issue was fixed in commit a5264a6f41524afe8ceadf1d8ddc8c80f323ebc4 from apache/flink:master.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-flinkApache Flink
CWE ID-CWE-23
Relative Path Traversal
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2016-8743
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-6.78% / 90.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jul, 2017 | 21:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache HTTP Server, in all releases prior to 2.2.32 and 2.4.25, was liberal in the whitespace accepted from requests and sent in response lines and headers. Accepting these different behaviors represented a security concern when httpd participates in any chain of proxies or interacts with back-end application servers, either through mod_proxy or using conventional CGI mechanisms, and may result in request smuggling, response splitting and cache pollution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxRed Hat, Inc.The Apache Software FoundationNetApp, Inc.
Product-oncommand_unified_managerenterprise_linux_desktopenterprise_linux_server_ausenterprise_linux_server_tusjboss_core_servicesenterprise_linux_eusclustered_data_ontapenterprise_linux_workstationenterprise_linuxdebian_linuxenterprise_linux_serverhttp_serverApache HTTP Server
CVE-2018-8034
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-13.68% / 93.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2018 | 18:00
Updated-21 Oct, 2024 | 16:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The host name verification when using TLS with the WebSocket client was missing. It is now enabled by default. Versions Affected: Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.31, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.52, and 7.0.35 to 7.0.88.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Canonical Ltd.The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-retail_order_brokerubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxtomcatApache Tomcat
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-8019
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.90% / 74.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When using an OCSP responder Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.0 to 1.2.16 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 did not correctly handle invalid responses. This allowed for revoked client certificates to be incorrectly identified. It was therefore possible for users to authenticate with revoked certificates when using mutual TLS. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtomcat_nativeApache Tomcat Native
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-29733
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-2.7||LOW
EPSS-0.08% / 23.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2024 | 17:21
Updated-10 Jul, 2025 | 18:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Airflow FTP Provider: FTP_TLS instance with unverified SSL context

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Apache Airflow FTP Provider. The FTP hook lacks complete certificate validation in FTP_TLS connections, which can potentially be leveraged. Implementing proper certificate validation by passing context=ssl.create_default_context() during FTP_TLS instantiation is used as mitigation to validate the certificates properly. This issue affects Apache Airflow FTP Provider: before 3.7.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.7.0, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-apache-airflow-providers-ftpApache Airflow FTP Providerairflow
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-20245
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2019 | 17:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The LDAP auth backend (airflow.contrib.auth.backends.ldap_auth) prior to Apache Airflow 1.10.1 was misconfigured and contained improper checking of exceptions which disabled server certificate checking.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-airflowApache Airflow
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-17187
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.52% / 65.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Apache Qpid Proton-J transport includes an optional wrapper layer to perform TLS, enabled by use of the 'transport.ssl(...)' methods. Unless a verification mode was explicitly configured, client and server modes previously defaulted as documented to not verifying a peer certificate, with options to configure this explicitly or select a certificate verification mode with or without hostname verification being performed. The latter hostname verifying mode was not implemented in Apache Qpid Proton-J versions 0.3 to 0.29.0, with attempts to use it resulting in an exception. This left only the option to verify the certificate is trusted, leaving such a client vulnerable to Man In The Middle (MITM) attack. Uses of the Proton-J protocol engine which do not utilise the optional transport TLS wrapper are not impacted, e.g. usage within Qpid JMS. Uses of Proton-J utilising the optional transport TLS wrapper layer that wish to enable hostname verification must be upgraded to version 0.30.0 or later and utilise the VerifyMode#VERIFY_PEER_NAME configuration, which is now the default for client mode usage unless configured otherwise.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-qpid_proton-jApache Qpid Proton-J
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-49250
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Feb, 2024 | 10:00
Updated-18 Mar, 2025 | 17:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache DolphinScheduler: Insecure TLS TrustManager used in HttpUtil

Because the HttpUtils class did not verify certificates, an attacker that could perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack on outgoing https connections could impersonate the server. This issue affects Apache DolphinScheduler: before 3.2.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.2.1, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-dolphinschedulerApache DolphinSchedulerdolphinscheduler
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-11775
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.66% / 70.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

TLS hostname verification when using the Apache ActiveMQ Client before 5.15.6 was missing which could make the client vulnerable to a MITM attack between a Java application using the ActiveMQ client and the ActiveMQ server. This is now enabled by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-enterprise_repositoryflexcube_private_bankingactivemqApache ActiveMQ
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-41180
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Sep, 2023 | 15:52
Updated-27 Sep, 2024 | 18:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++: Incorrect Certificate Validation in InvokeHTTP for MiNiFi C++

Incorrect certificate validation in InvokeHTTP on Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ versions 0.13 to 0.14 allows an intermediary to present a forged certificate during TLS handshake negotation. The Disable Peer Verification property of InvokeHTTP was effectively flipped, disabling verification by default, when using HTTPS. Mitigation: Set the Disable Peer Verification property of InvokeHTTP to true when using MiNiFi C++ versions 0.13.0 or 0.14.0. Upgrading to MiNiFi C++ 0.15.0 corrects the default behavior.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-nifi_minifi_c\+\+Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33682
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 42.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-27 May, 2025 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Disabled Hostname Verification makes Brokers, Proxies vulnerable to MITM attack

TLS hostname verification cannot be enabled in the Pulsar Broker's Java Client, the Pulsar Broker's Java Admin Client, the Pulsar WebSocket Proxy's Java Client, and the Pulsar Proxy's Admin Client leaving intra-cluster connections and geo-replication connections vulnerable to man in the middle attacks, which could leak credentials, configuration data, message data, and any other data sent by these clients. The vulnerability is for both the pulsar+ssl protocol and HTTPS. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack by providing the client with a cryptographically valid certificate for an unrelated host. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Broker, Proxy, and WebSocket Proxy versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0; 2.6.4 and earlier.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-5653
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.17% / 86.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Apr, 2017 | 16:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-cxfApache CXF
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33683
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-22 May, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Disabled Certificate Validation makes Broker, Proxy Admin Clients vulnerable to MITM attack

Apache Pulsar Brokers and Proxies create an internal Pulsar Admin Client that does not verify peer TLS certificates, even when tlsAllowInsecureConnection is disabled via configuration. The Pulsar Admin Client's intra-cluster and geo-replication HTTPS connections are vulnerable to man in the middle attacks, which could leak authentication data, configuration data, and any other data sent by these clients. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Broker and Proxy versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0; 2.6.4 and earlier.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33681
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 20.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-22 May, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Hostname Verification in Java Client and Proxy can expose authentication data via MITM

Delayed TLS hostname verification in the Pulsar Java Client and the Pulsar Proxy make each client vulnerable to a man in the middle attack. Connections from the Pulsar Java Client to the Pulsar Broker/Proxy and connections from the Pulsar Proxy to the Pulsar Broker are vulnerable. Authentication data is sent before verifying the server’s TLS certificate matches the hostname, which means authentication data could be exposed to an attacker. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack by providing the client with a cryptographically valid certificate for an unrelated host. Because the client sends authentication data before performing hostname verification, an attacker could gain access to the client’s authentication data. The client eventually closes the connection when it verifies the hostname and identifies the targeted hostname does not match a hostname on the certificate. Because the client eventually closes the connection, the value of the intercepted authentication data depends on the authentication method used by the client. Token based authentication and username/password authentication methods are vulnerable because the authentication data can be used to impersonate the client in a separate session. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Java Client versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0; 2.6.4 and earlier.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33684
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-02 May, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Pulsar C++/Python OAuth Clients prior to 3.0.0 were vulnerable to an MITM attack due to Disabled Certificate Validation

The Apache Pulsar C++ Client does not verify peer TLS certificates when making HTTPS calls for the OAuth2.0 Client Credential Flow, even when tlsAllowInsecureConnection is disabled via configuration. This vulnerability allows an attacker to perform a man in the middle attack and intercept and/or modify the GET request that is sent to the ClientCredentialFlow 'issuer url'. The intercepted credentials can be used to acquire authentication data from the OAuth2.0 server to then authenticate with an Apache Pulsar cluster. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack. The Apache Pulsar Python Client wraps the C++ client, so it is also vulnerable in the same way. This issue affects Apache Pulsar C++ Client and Python Client versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0 to 2.10.1; 2.6.4 and earlier. Any users running affected versions of the C++ Client or the Python Client should rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials, including client_id and client_secret. 2.7 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.7.5 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 2.8 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.8.4 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 2.9 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.9.3 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 2.10 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.10.2 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 3.0 C++ users are unaffected and 3.0 Python Client users will be unaffected when it is released. Any users running the C++ and Python Client for 2.6 or less should upgrade to one of the above patched versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32531
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 32.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Dec, 2022 | 10:17
Updated-17 Apr, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache BookKeeper: Java Client Uses Connection to Host that Failed Hostname Verification

The Apache Bookkeeper Java Client (before 4.14.6 and also 4.15.0) does not close the connection to the bookkeeper server when TLS hostname verification fails. This leaves the bookkeeper client vulnerable to a man in the middle attack. The problem affects BookKeeper client prior to versions 4.14.6 and 4.15.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-bookkeeperApache BookKeeper
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-39441
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 44.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2023 | 15:39
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Airflow SMTP Provider, Apache Airflow IMAP Provider, Apache Airflow: SMTP/IMAP client components allowed MITM due to missing Certificate Validation

Apache Airflow SMTP Provider before 1.3.0, Apache Airflow IMAP Provider before 3.3.0, and Apache Airflow before 2.7.0 are affected by the Validation of OpenSSL Certificate vulnerability. The default SSL context with SSL library did not check a server's X.509 certificate.  Instead, the code accepted any certificate, which could result in the disclosure of mail server credentials or mail contents when the client connects to an attacker in a MITM position. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to Apache Airflow version 2.7.0 or newer, Apache Airflow IMAP Provider version 3.3.0 or newer, and Apache Airflow SMTP Provider version 1.3.0 or newer to mitigate the risk associated with this vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-apache-airflow-providers-smtpairflowapache-airflow-providers-imapApache Airflow SMTP ProviderApache AirflowApache Airflow IMAP Provider
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-8020
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.58% / 80.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 01:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.0 to 1.2.16 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 has a flaw that does not properly check OCSP pre-produced responses, which are lists (multiple entries) of certificate statuses. Subsequently, revoked client certificates may not be properly identified, allowing for users to authenticate with revoked certificates to connections that require mutual TLS. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtomcat_nativeApache Tomcat Native
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44549
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 48.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
SMTPS server hostname not checked when making TLS connection to SMTPS server

Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail provides a simple layer on top of JavaMail/Jakarta Mail for OSGi to send mails via SMTPS. To reduce the risk of "man in the middle" attacks additional server identity checks must be performed when accessing mail servers. For compatibility reasons these additional checks are disabled by default in JavaMail/Jakarta Mail. The SimpleMailService in Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0 lacks an option to enable these checks for the shared mail session. A user could enable these checks nevertheless by accessing the session via the message created by SimpleMessageBuilder and setting the property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true. Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 2.0 adds support for enabling server identity checks and these checks are enabled by default. - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/SSLNOTES.txt - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/api/com/sun/mail/smtp/package-summary.html - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/mail/issues/429

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-sling_commons_messaging_mailApache Sling Commons Messaging Mail
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-15698
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.83% / 73.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jan, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When parsing the AIA-Extension field of a client certificate, Apache Tomcat Native Connector 1.2.0 to 1.2.14 and 1.1.23 to 1.1.34 did not correctly handle fields longer than 127 bytes. The result of the parsing error was to skip the OCSP check. It was therefore possible for client certificates that should have been rejected (if the OCSP check had been made) to be accepted. Users not using OCSP checks are not affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxtomcat_nativeApache Tomcat Native
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-3083
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Hive (JDBC + HiveServer2) implements SSL for plain TCP and HTTP connections (it supports both transport modes). While validating the server's certificate during the connection setup, the client in Apache Hive before 1.2.2 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 doesn't seem to be verifying the common name attribute of the certificate. In this way, if a JDBC client sends an SSL request to server abc.com, and the server responds with a valid certificate (certified by CA) but issued to xyz.com, the client will accept that as a valid certificate and the SSL handshake will go through.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-hiveApache Hive
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-25141
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.07% / 22.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Feb, 2024 | 20:30
Updated-28 Apr, 2025 | 18:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Airflow Mongo Provider: Certificate validation isn't respected even if SSL is enabled for apache-airflow-providers-mongo

When ssl was enabled for Mongo Hook, default settings included "allow_insecure" which caused that certificates were not validated. This was unexpected and undocumented. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.0, which fixes this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-apache-airflow-providers-mongoApache Airflow Mongo Providerairflow_mongo_provider
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-20011
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 May, 2021 | 20:09
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libgrss through 0.7.0 fails to perform TLS certificate verification when downloading feeds, allowing remote attackers to manipulate the contents of feeds without detection. This occurs because of the default behavior of SoupSessionSync.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME Project
Product-libgrssn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-7143
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.35% / 56.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2019 | 13:04
Updated-25 Nov, 2024 | 18:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Python Twisted 14.0 trustRoot is not respected in HTTP client

Action-Not Available
Vendor-twistedn/a
Product-twistedn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-1514
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.07% / 21.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Dec, 2023 | 14:22
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 05:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hitachi Energy Ltd.
Product-rtu500_scripting_interfaceRTU500 Scripting Interface
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-1409
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MongoDB, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MongoDB, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 46.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2023 | 15:21
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate validation issue in MongoDB Server running on Windows or macOS

If the MongoDB Server running on Windows or macOS is configured to use TLS with a specific set of configuration options that are already known to work securely in other platforms (e.g. Linux), it is possible that client certificate validation may not be in effect, potentially allowing client to establish a TLS connection with the server that supplies any certificate. This issue affect all MongoDB Server v6.3 versions, MongoDB Server v5.0 versions v5.0.0 to v5.0.14 and all MongoDB Server v4.4 versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft CorporationMongoDB, Inc.Apple Inc.
Product-windowsmongodbmacosMongoDB Server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2009-3046
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 35.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Sep, 2009 | 17:00
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 06:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Opera before 10.00 does not check all intermediate X.509 certificates for revocation, which makes it easier for remote SSL servers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a revoked certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOpera
Product-opera_browsern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-45391
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 7.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin 4.8.0.143 and earlier globally and unconditionally disables SSL/TLS certificate and hostname validation for the entire Jenkins controller JVM.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-ns-nd_integration_performance_publisherJenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-0534
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.95% / 75.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Aug, 2015 | 10:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite (MES) 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.3, RSA BSAFE Crypto-J before 6.2, RSA BSAFE SSL-J before 6.2, and RSA BSAFE SSL-C 2.8.9 and earlier do not enforce certain constraints on certificate data, which allows remote attackers to defeat a fingerprint-based certificate-blacklist protection mechanism by including crafted data within a certificate's unsigned portion, a similar issue to CVE-2014-8275.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDell Inc.
Product-bsafe_ssl-cbsafebsafe_ssl-jn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-36377
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 29.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2021 | 12:11
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Fossil before 2.14.2 and 2.15.x before 2.15.2 often skips the hostname check during TLS certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fossil-scmn/aFedora Project
Product-fossilfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-47700
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.04% / 8.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Feb, 2024 | 16:20
Updated-22 Aug, 2024 | 13:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM Storage Virtualize improper certificate validation

IBM SAN Volume Controller, IBM Storwize, IBM FlashSystem and IBM Storage Virtualize 8.6 products could allow a remote attacker to spoof a trusted system that would not be correctly validated by the Storwize server. This could lead to a user connecting to a malicious host, believing that it was a trusted system and deceived into accepting spoofed data. IBM X-Force ID: 271016.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-storage_virtualizeStorage Virtualize
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-15604
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Trend Micro, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Trend Micro, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Sep, 2020 | 01:50
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An incomplete SSL server certification validation vulnerability in the Trend Micro Security 2019 (v15) consumer family of products could allow an attacker to combine this vulnerability with another attack to trick an affected client into downloading a malicious update instead of the expected one. CWE-494: Update files are not properly verified.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft CorporationTrend Micro Incorporated
Product-internet_security_2019officescan_cloudmaximum_security_2019premium_security_2019windowsantivirus\+_2019Trend Micro Security (Consumer)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-494
Download of Code Without Integrity Check
CVE-2021-29653
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 29.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Apr, 2021 | 16:41
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise 1.5.1 and newer, under certain circumstances, may exclude revoked but unexpired certificates from the CRL. Fixed in 1.5.8, 1.6.4, and 1.7.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-vaultn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-15732
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 24.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jun, 2021 | 14:50
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 01:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the Online Threat Prevention module as used in Bitdefender Total Security allows an attacker to potentially bypass HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) checks. This issue affects: Bitdefender Total Security versions prior to 25.0.7.29. Bitdefender Internet Security versions prior to 25.0.7.29. Bitdefender Antivirus Plus versions prior to 25.0.7.29.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-internet_securitytotal_securityantivirus_plusAntivirus PlusInternet SecurityTotal Security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-0294
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.58% / 68.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 15:12
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 04:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

GnuTLS before 3.3.13 does not validate that the signature algorithms match when importing a certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GnuTLSRed Hat, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxGNU
Product-debian_linuxgnutlsenterprise_linuxGnuTLS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29495
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 23.35%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-07 May, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Nim stdlib httpClient does not validate peer certificates by default

Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. In Nim standard library before 1.4.2, httpClient SSL/TLS certificate verification was disabled by default. Users can upgrade to version 1.4.2 to receive a patch or, as a workaround, set "verifyMode = CVerifyPeer" as documented.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nim-langnim-lang
Product-nimsecurity
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-27018
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 27.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Aug, 2021 | 17:56
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The mechanism which performs certificate validation was discovered to have a flaw that resulted in certificates signed by an internal certificate authority to not be properly validated. This issue only affects clients that are configured to utilize Tenable.sc as the vulnerability data source.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aPerforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-remediatePuppet Remediate
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25633
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 52.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 16:43
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Content Manipulation with Double Certificate Attack

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to combine multiple certificate data, which when opened caused LibreOffice to display a validly signed indicator but whose content was unrelated to the signature shown. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25634
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2021 | 13:33
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timestamp Manipulation with Signature Wrapping

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to modify a digitally signed ODF document to insert an additional signing time timestamp which LibreOffice would incorrectly present as a valid signature signed at the bogus signing time. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-38325
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.07% / 76.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jul, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-30 Oct, 2024 | 16:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The cryptography package before 41.0.2 for Python mishandles SSH certificates that have critical options.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cryptography.ion/a
Product-cryptographyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0227
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 76.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Apr, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-29 Nov, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client Certificate Authentication feature for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection and bypass certain SSL certificate verification steps. The vulnerability is due to incorrect verification of the SSL Client Certificate. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to the ASA VPN without a proper private key and certificate pair. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection to the ASA when the connection should have been rejected. This vulnerability affects Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software that is running on the following Cisco products: 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliances (ISA), ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls, ASA Services Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliances (ASAv), Firepower 4110 Security Appliances, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Modules. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg40155.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-firepower_threat_defenseadaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco Adaptive Security Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-45197
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.08% / 23.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Dec, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-14 Apr, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Slixmpp before 1.8.3 lacks SSL Certificate hostname validation in XMLStream, allowing an attacker to pose as any server in the eyes of Slixmpp.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-slixmpp_projectn/a
Product-slixmppn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found