CSRF in admin/manage-comments.php in Chadha PHPKB Standard Multi-Language 9 allows attackers to delete a comment via a crafted request.
The Copymatic – AI Content Writer & Generator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'copymatic-menu' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the copymatic_apikey option via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Float menu WordPress plugin before 4.3.1 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting menu, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CRM Perks Integration for Contact Form 7 and Salesforce.This issue affects Integration for Contact Form 7 and Salesforce: from n/a through 1.3.9.
The WP Fastest Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpfc_remove_cdn_integration_ajax_request_callback function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change cdn settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
IBM Operations Analytics – Log Analysis versions 1.3.5.0 through 1.3.8.3 and IBM SmartCloud Analytics – Log Analysis are vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to trick a trusted user into performing unauthorized actions.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Themis Plugin 1.4.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server.
Tuleap is an Open Source Suite for management of software development and collaboration. Tuleap Community Edition versions below 17.0.99.1762444754 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions prior to 17.0-2, 16.13-7 and 16.12-10 allow attackers trick victims into changing tracker general settings. This issue is fixed in version Tuleap Community Edition version 17.0.99.1762444754 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition versions 17.0-2, 16.13-7 and 16.12-10.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Omid Shamloo Pardakht Delkhah allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Pardakht Delkhah: from n/a through 3.0.0.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alex Prokopenko / JustCoded Just TinyMCE Custom Styles just-tinymce-styles allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Just TinyMCE Custom Styles: from n/a through <= 1.2.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Serhii Pasyuk Gmedia Photo Gallery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Gmedia Photo Gallery: from n/a through 1.24.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Revellin-Clerc Media Library Downloader media-library-downloader allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Media Library Downloader: from n/a through <= 1.4.0.
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in code-projects School Fees Payment System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Yooslider Yoo Slider <= 2.0.0 on WordPress allows attackers to create or modify slider.
The Calendar Event Multi View WordPress plugin before 1.4.07 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks in place when creating an event, and is also lacking sanitisation as well as escaping in some of the event fields. This could allow unauthenticated attackers to create arbitrary events and put Cross-Site Scripting payloads in it.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Valerio Monti Auto Alt Text auto-alt-text allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Auto Alt Text: from n/a through <= 2.5.2.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kunal Nagar Custom 404 Pro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Custom 404 Pro: from n/a through 3.12.0.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository livehelperchat/livehelperchat prior to 2.0.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Merv Barrett Import into Easy Property Listings allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Import into Easy Property Listings: from n/a through 2.2.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Flashyapp WP Flashy Marketing Automation wp-flashy-marketing-automation allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Flashy Marketing Automation: from n/a through <= 2.0.8.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in photoboxone SMTP Mail smtp-mail allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects SMTP Mail: from n/a through <= 1.3.47.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Channelize.Io Team Live Shopping & Shoppable Videos For WooCommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Live Shopping & Shoppable Videos For WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.2.0.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saad Iqbal Post Snippets allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Post Snippets: from n/a through 4.0.11.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Imdad Next Web iNext Woo Pincode Checker allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects iNext Woo Pincode Checker: from n/a through 2.3.1.
The Team Circle Image Slider With Lightbox plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the circle_thumbnail_slider_with_lightbox_image_management_func() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to edit image data which can be used to inject malicious JavaScript, along with deleting images, and uploading malicious files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The EWWW Image Optimizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 5.8.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ewww_ngg_bulk_init() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform bulk image optimization via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MERGADO Mergado Pack allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Mergado Pack: from n/a through 4.2.0.
An issue was discovered in YzmCMS V5.8. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can add member user accounts via member/member/add.html.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ProteusThemes Custom Sidebars by ProteusThemes custom-sidebars-by-proteusthemes allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Custom Sidebars by ProteusThemes: from n/a through <= 1.0.3.
Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.4, 10.12.x <= 10.12.2, 10.11.x <= 10.11.6 and Mattermost Calls versions <=1.10.0 fail to implement CSRF protection on the Calls widget page which allows an authenticated attacker to initiate calls and inject messages into channels or direct messages via a malicious webpage or crafted link
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/ca_deal.php?mudi=del&dataType=&dataTypeCN.
A CSRF forgery vulnerability exists in rails < 5.2.5, rails < 6.0.4 that makes it possible for an attacker to, given a global CSRF token such as the one present in the authenticity_token meta tag, forge a per-form CSRF token.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PluginOps Feather Login Page allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Feather Login Page: from n/a through 1.1.7.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in apasionados DoFollow Case by Case dofollow-case-by-case allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects DoFollow Case by Case: from n/a through <= 3.5.1.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Liferay Portal 7.4.1 through 7.4.3.112, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows remote attackers to add and edit publication comments.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in tryinteract Interact: Embed A Quiz On Your Site allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Interact: Embed A Quiz On Your Site: from n/a through 3.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in JK Social Photo Fetcher facebook-photo-fetcher allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Social Photo Fetcher: from n/a through <= 3.0.4.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Manidoraisamy FormFacade allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects FormFacade: from n/a through 1.4.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in emendo_seb Co-marquage service-public.Fr allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Co-marquage service-public.Fr: from n/a through 0.5.77.
The RapidLoad Power-Up for Autoptimize plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the queue_posts function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's cache via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ink themes WP Gmail SMTP allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Gmail SMTP: from n/a through 1.0.7.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Eugen Bobrowski Robots.Txt rewrite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Robots.Txt rewrite: from n/a through 1.6.1.
A vulnerability was found in PHPGurukul Car Rental Portal 3.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in instapagedev Instapage Plugin allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Instapage Plugin: from n/a through 3.5.12.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Galaxy Weblinks Post Featured Video allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Post Featured Video: from n/a through 1.7.
The Seraphinite Accelerator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.27.21. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'OnAdminApi_CacheOpBegin' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform several administrative actions, including deleting the cache, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in johnh10 Video Blogster Lite video-blogster-lite allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Video Blogster Lite: from n/a through <= 1.2.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in yonifre Lenix scss compiler allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Lenix scss compiler: from n/a through 1.2.
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in WP Ultimate CSV Importer Plugin 3.7.2 on WordPress. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 3.7.3 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 13c30af721d3f989caac72dd0f56cf0dc40fad7e. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-241317 was assigned to this vulnerability.
A vulnerability was found in WuKongOpenSource WukongCRM 9.0 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file AdminRoleController.java. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.