Multiple improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilities [CWE-78] in FortiWeb version 7.0.1 and below, 6.4 all versions, version 6.3.19 and below may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted parameters of HTTP requests.

Possible Command Injection in iManager GET parameter has been discovered in OpenText™ iManager 3.2.6.0000.

An OS command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QUSBCam2. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow users to execute commands via a network. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QUSBCam2 2.0.3 ( 2023/06/15 ) and later

An OS command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP operating systems. If exploited, the vulnerability allows remote authenticated users to execute commands via susceptible QNAP devices. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.0.1.2376 build 20230421 and later QTS 4.5.4.2374 build 20230416 and later QuTS hero h5.0.1.2376 build 20230421 and later QuTS hero h4.5.4.2374 build 20230417 and later QuTScloud c5.0.1.2374 and later

jc21 NGINX Proxy Manager through 2.9.19 allows OS command injection. When creating an access list, the backend builds an htpasswd file with crafted username and/or password input that is concatenated without any validation, and is directly passed to the exec command, potentially allowing an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system. NOTE: this is not part of any NGINX software shipped by F5.

A post-authentication remote command injection vulnerability in a CGI file in Western Digital My Cloud OS 5 devices that could allow an attacker to build files with redirects and execute larger payloads. This issue affects My Cloud OS 5 devices: before 5.26.300.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of the Wireless LAN Controller feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with a lobby ambassador user account to perform a command injection attack against an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted input to the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary Cisco IOS XE Software CLI commands with privilege level 15. Note: This vulnerability is exploitable only if the attacker obtains the credentials for a lobby ambassador account. This account is not configured by default.

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command vulnerability [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.6, FortiSandbox 4.2.1 through 4.2.7, FortiSandbox 4.0.0 through 4.0.5, FortiSandbox 3.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.1 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.0 all versions allows an authenticated attacker with at least read-only permission to execute unauthorized commands via crafted requests.

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the vtysh_ubus tcpdump_start_cb functionality of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to command execution. An authenticated attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

Manyfold is an open source, self-hosted web application for managing a collection of 3d models, particularly focused on 3d printing. Prior to version 0.133.0, when model render generation is enabled, a logged-in user can achieve RCE by uploading a ZIP containing a file with a shell metacharacter in its name. The filename reaches a Ruby backtick call unsanitized. Version 0.133.0 fixes the issue.

The post-authentication command injection vulnerability in the Zyxel NBG6604 firmware version V1.01(ABIR.0)C0 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute some OS commands remotely by sending a crafted HTTP request.

Command injection vulnerability exists in iControl REST and BIG-IP TMOS Shell (tmsh) save command, which may allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary system commands. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Dokploy is a self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS) that simplifies the deployment and management of applications and databases. An authenticated, low-privileged user can run arbitrary OS commands on the Dokploy host. The tRPC procedure docker.getContainersByAppNameMatch interpolates the attacker-supplied appName value into a Docker CLI call without sanitisation, enabling command injection under the Dokploy service account. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.23.7.

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the vtysh_ubus _get_fw_logs functionality of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5. A specially crafted network request can lead to command execution. An attacker can send a network request to trigger this vulnerability.

User provided input is not sanitized on the AXIS License Plate Verifier specific “api.cgi” allowing for arbitrary code execution.

OPNsense before 25.1.8 contains an authenticated command injection vulnerability in its Bridge Interface Edit endpoint (interfaces_bridge_edit.php). The span POST parameter is concatenated into a system-level command without proper sanitization or escaping, allowing an administrator to inject arbitrary shell operators and payloads. Successful exploitation results in remote code execution with the privileges of the web service (typically root), potentially leading to full system compromise or lateral movement. This vulnerability arises from inadequate input validation and improper handling of user-supplied data in backend command invocations.

IBM Security Verify Directory 10.0.0 through 10.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by sending a specially crafted request.

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web management interface of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. The attacker would need valid device credentials but does not require administrator privileges to exploit this vulnerability. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input for certain configuration options. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by using crafted input within the device configuration GUI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device including the underlying operating system which could also affect the availability of the device.

An OS Command Injection vulnerability exists in SIMULIA 3DOrchestrate from Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2021x through Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2023x. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary command execution.

Tenda G3 v3.0 v15.11.0.20 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the formSetUSBPartitionUmount function.

A vulnerability in the Cisco IOx application hosting environment could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root on the underlying host operating system. This vulnerability is due to incomplete sanitization of parameters that are passed in for activation of an application. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by deploying and activating an application in the Cisco IOx application hosting environment with a crafted activation payload file. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root on the underlying host operating system.

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in EasyNAS 1.1.0. Affected is the function system of the file /backup.pl. The manipulation leads to os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

An remote attacker with low privileges can perform a command injection which can lead to root access.

NetModule NSRW web administration interface executes an OS command constructed with unsanitized user input. A successful exploit could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges. This issue affects NSRW: from 4.3.0.0 before 4.3.0.119, from 4.4.0.0 before 4.4.0.118, from 4.6.0.0 before 4.6.0.105, from 4.7.0.0 before 4.7.0.103.

OrangeScrum version 2.0.11 allows an authenticated external attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the server. This is possible because the application injects an attacker-controlled parameter into a system function.

A vulnerability was found in Tenda W6-S 1.0.0.4(510). This affects the function TendaAte of the file /goform/ate of the component ATE Service. Performing a manipulation results in os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

A vulnerability has been found in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System up to 3.0.8. This vulnerability affects the function uploadCN of the file VersionController.java. The manipulation of the argument filename leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Algo 8028 Control Panel version 3.3.3 contains a command injection vulnerability in the fm-data.lua endpoint that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands. Attackers can exploit the insecure 'source' parameter by injecting commands that are executed with root privileges, enabling remote code execution through a crafted POST request.

SOUND4 IMPACT/FIRST/PULSE/Eco <=2.x contains an authenticated command injection vulnerability in the www-data-handler.php script that allows attackers to inject system commands through the 'services' POST parameter. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting malicious 'services' parameter values to execute arbitrary system commands with www-data user privileges.

Adtran 834-5 11.1.0.101-202106231430, and fixed as of SmartOS Version 12.6.3.1, devices allow OS Command Injection via shell metacharacters to the Ping or Traceroute utility.

TOTOLINK X5000R V9.1.0cu.2350_B20230313 was discovered to contain an authenticated remote command execution (RCE) vulnerability via the "mru" parameter in the "cstecgi.cgi" binary.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “notes view” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the vendor_state parameter of the “vendor print report” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “admin brand portal” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “ticket watchers email” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “message viewer print” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.

A command injection vulnerability exists in the download and convert report feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a shell command. This allows for the injection of arbitrary commands to the underlying operating system.

A command injection vulnerability exists in the dashboard scheduler feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a shell command. This allows for the injection of arbitrary commands to the underlying operating system.

A command injection vulnerability exists in the ARP ping device tool feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user controlled input and passes it directly to a shell command. This allows for the injection of arbitrary commands to the underlying operating system.

A command injection vulnerability exists in the “dash export” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user controlled input and passes it directly to a shell command. This allows for the injection of arbitrary commands to the underlying operating system.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “ticket event report” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “message viewer iframe” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “reporter events type date” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “reporter events type” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “schedule editor decoupled” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.

An issue was discovered in Logpoint before 7.1.1. Template injection was seen in the search template. The search template uses jinja templating for generating dynamic data. This could be abused to achieve code execution. Any user with access to create a search template can leverage this to execute code as the loginspect user.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “logging export” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.

A command injection vulnerability exists in the ticket report generate feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user controlled input and passes it directly to a shell command. This allows for the injection of arbitrary commands to the underlying operating system.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “schedule editor” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “reporting job editor” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.