Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2026-7307

Summary
Assigner-redhat
Assigner Org ID-53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749
Published At-19 May, 2026 | 10:52
Updated At-20 May, 2026 | 11:38
Rejected At-
Credits

Keycloak: keycloak: denial of service via specially crafted saml input

A flaw was found in Keycloak. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted XML input to the Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) endpoint. This malicious input can cause high CPU usage and worker thread starvation, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) where the server becomes unavailable.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:redhat
Assigner Org ID:53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749
Published At:19 May, 2026 | 10:52
Updated At:20 May, 2026 | 11:38
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Keycloak: keycloak: denial of service via specially crafted saml input

A flaw was found in Keycloak. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted XML input to the Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) endpoint. This malicious input can cause high CPU usage and worker thread starvation, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) where the server becomes unavailable.

Affected Products
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.2.16
Collection URL
https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/
Package Name
rhbk/keycloak-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:build_keycloak:26.2::el9
Default Status
unaffected
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:build_keycloak:26.4::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 26.4.12-1 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhbk/keycloak-rhel9
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:build_keycloak:26.4::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 26.4-17 before * (rpm)
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4
Collection URL
https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/
Package Name
rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:build_keycloak:26.4::el9
Default Status
affected
Versions
Unaffected
  • From 26.4-17 before * (rpm)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-1286Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-1286
Description: Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Metrics Other Info
Red Hat severity rating
value:
Important
namespace:
https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

To mitigate this vulnerability, restrict network access to the Keycloak SAML endpoint to trusted networks and clients. Implement firewall rules to limit inbound connections to the Keycloak service port (e.g., 8080) from untrusted sources. If the SAML protocol is not required for your deployment, consider disabling it to eliminate the attack surface. Applying these network restrictions or configuration changes may necessitate a restart or reload of the Keycloak service, which could temporarily affect its availability.

Exploits

Credits

Red Hat would like to thank Anchels for reporting this issue.
Timeline
EventDate
Reported to Red Hat.2026-05-12 16:20:11
Made public.2026-05-19 10:42:34
Event: Reported to Red Hat.
Date: 2026-05-12 16:20:11
Event: Made public.
Date: 2026-05-19 10:42:34
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19594
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19597
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_REDHAT
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7307
vdb-entry
x_refsource_REDHAT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2476526
issue-tracking
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19594
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19597
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7307
Resource:
vdb-entry
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2476526
Resource:
issue-tracking
x_refsource_REDHAT
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:secalert@redhat.com
Published At:19 May, 2026 | 12:16
Updated At:20 May, 2026 | 12:16

A flaw was found in Keycloak. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted XML input to the Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) endpoint. This malicious input can cause high CPU usage and worker thread starvation, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) where the server becomes unavailable.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CPE Matches

Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-1286Secondarysecalert@redhat.com
CWE ID: CWE-1286
Type: Secondary
Source: secalert@redhat.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19594secalert@redhat.com
N/A
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19597secalert@redhat.com
N/A
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7307secalert@redhat.com
N/A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2476526secalert@redhat.com
N/A
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19594
Source: secalert@redhat.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19597
Source: secalert@redhat.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7307
Source: secalert@redhat.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2476526
Source: secalert@redhat.com
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

117Records found

CVE-2024-39542
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 55.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jul, 2024 | 16:17
Updated-08 Aug, 2025 | 16:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: A malformed CFM packet or specific transit traffic leads to FPC crash

An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with MPC10/11 or LC9600, MX304, and Junos OS Evolved on ACX Series and PTX Series allows an unauthenticated, network based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). This issue can occur in two scenarios: 1. If a device, which is configured with SFLOW and ECMP, receives specific valid transit traffic, which is subject to sampling, the packetio process crashes, which in turn leads to an evo-aftman crash and causes the FPC to stop working until it is restarted. (This scenario is only applicable to PTX but not to ACX or MX.) 2. If a device receives a malformed CFM packet on an interface configured with CFM, the packetio process crashes, which in turn leads to an evo-aftman crash and causes the FPC to stop working until it is restarted. Please note that the CVSS score is for the formally more severe issue 1. The CVSS score for scenario 2. is: 6.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) This issue affects Junos OS: * All versions before 21.2R3-S4, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R2, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S2;  Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 21.2R3-S8-EVO, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R2-EVO.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-junosjunos_os_evolvedJunos OSJunos OS Evolvedjunos_os_evolvedjunos_os
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2026-21917
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 12.66%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-15 Jan, 2026 | 20:27
Updated-23 Jan, 2026 | 19:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: SRX Series: Specifically malformed SSL packet causes FPC crash

An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the Web-Filtering module of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). If an SRX device configured for UTM Web-Filtering receives a specifically malformed SSL packet, this will cause an FPC crash and restart. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX Series: * 23.2 versions from 23.2R2-S2 before 23.2R2-S5,  * 23.4 versions from 23.4R2-S1 before 23.4R2-S5, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S2, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S3, 24.4R2. Earlier versions of Junos are also affected, but no fix is available.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-srx345srx4200srx5600srx4700srx4100srx1500srx300srx340srx5400junossrx320srx4600srx5800srx4120srx4300srx2300srx380srx1600Junos OS
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2024-21598
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 34.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Apr, 2024 | 14:54
Updated-06 Feb, 2025 | 16:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: A malformed BGP tunnel encapsulation attribute will lead to an rpd crash

An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a network-based, unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). If a BGP update is received over an established BGP session which contains a tunnel encapsulation attribute with a specifically malformed TLV, rpd will crash and restart. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: * 20.4 versions 20.4R1 and later versions earlier than 20.4R3-S9; * 21.2 versions earlier than 21.2R3-S7; * 21.3 versions earlier than 21.3R3-S5; * 21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S5; * 22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S4; * 22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S3; * 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R3-S1; * 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R3; * 23.2 versions earlier than 23.2R1-S2, 23.2R2; Junos OS Evolved: * 20.4-EVO versions 20.4R1-EVO and later versions earlier than 20.4R3-S9-EVO; * 21.2-EVO versions earlier than 21.2R3-S7-EVO; * 21.3-EVO versions earlier than 21.3R3-S5-EVO; * 21.4-EVO versions earlier than 21.4R3-S5-EVO; * 22.1-EVO versions earlier than 22.1R3-S4-EVO; * 22.2-EVO versions earlier than 22.2R3-S3-EVO; * 22.3-EVO versions earlier than 22.3R3-S1-EVO; * 22.4-EVO versions earlier than 22.4R3-EVO; * 23.2-EVO versions earlier than 23.2R1-S2-EVO, 23.2R2-EVO; This issue does not affect Juniper Networks * Junos OS versions earlier than 20.4R1; * Junos OS Evolved versions earlier than 20.4R1-EVO. This is a related but separate issue than the one described in JSA79095.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-junosjunos_os_evolvedJunos OSJunos OS Evolvedjunos_os_evolvedjunos_os
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2024-21595
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jan, 2024 | 00:52
Updated-03 Sep, 2024 | 18:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: EX4100, EX4400, EX4600, QFX5000 Series: A high rate of specific ICMP traffic will cause the PFE to hang

An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows a network-based, unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). If an attacker sends high rate of specific ICMP traffic to a device with VXLAN configured, this causes a deadlock of the PFE and results in the device becoming unresponsive. A manual restart will be required to recover the device. This issue only affects EX4100, EX4400, EX4600, QFX5000 Series devices. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS * 21.4R3 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S4; * 22.1R3 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S3; * 22.2R2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S1; * 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3; * 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R2; * 23.1 versions earlier than 23.1R2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-ex4400qfx5210-64cqfx5220qfx5210qfx5110qfx5120qfx5100qfx5200-48yqfx5100-96sqfx5130ex4100ex4600qfx5200qfx5200-32cjunosqfx5700Junos OSjunos
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2024-21616
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 42.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jan, 2024 | 00:56
Updated-17 Jun, 2025 | 14:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: MX Series and SRX Series: Processing of a specific SIP packet causes NAT IP allocation to fail

An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause Denial of Service (DoS). On all Junos OS MX Series and SRX Series platforms, when SIP ALG is enabled, and a specific SIP packet is received and processed, NAT IP allocation fails for genuine traffic, which causes Denial of Service (DoS). Continuous receipt of this specific SIP ALG packet will cause a sustained DoS condition. NAT IP usage can be monitored by running the following command. user@srx> show security nat resource-usage source-pool <source_pool_name> Pool name: source_pool_name .. Address Factor-index Port-range Used Avail Total Usage X.X.X.X 0 Single Ports 50258 52342 62464 96% <<<<< - Alg Ports 0 2048 2048 0% This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series and SRX Series * All versions earlier than 21.2R3-S6; * 21.3 versions earlier than 21.3R3-S5; * 21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S5; * 22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S4; * 22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S3; * 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R3-S1; * 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3; * 23.2 versions earlier than 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-junosJunos OS
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2025-11573
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Amazon
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Amazon
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.33%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-09 Oct, 2025 | 17:48
Updated-14 Oct, 2025 | 19:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Denial of Service issue in Amazon.IonDotnet

An infinite loop issue in Amazon.IonDotnet library versions <v1.3.2 may allow a threat actor to cause a denial of service through a specially crafted text input. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.3.2. As of August 20, 2025, this library has been deprecated and will not receive further updates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Amazon
Product-Amazon.IonDotnet
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2022-22192
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.64% / 70.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2022 | 02:46
Updated-12 May, 2025 | 14:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS Evolved: PTX Series: An attacker can cause a kernel panic by sending a malformed TCP packet to the device

An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the kernel of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on PTX series allows a network-based, unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). When an incoming TCP packet destined to the device is malformed there is a possibility of a kernel panic. Only TCP packets destined to the ports for BGP, LDP and MSDP can trigger this. This issue only affects PTX10004, PTX10008, PTX10016. No other PTX Series devices or other platforms are affected. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved: 20.4-EVO versions prior to 20.4R3-S4-EVO; 21.3-EVO versions prior to 21.3R3-EVO; 21.4-EVO versions prior to 21.4R3-EVO; 22.1-EVO versions prior to 22.1R2-EVO. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved versions prior to 20.4R1-EVO.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-junos_os_evolvedptx10016ptx10008ptx10004Junos OS Evolved
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-1941
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Google LLC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Google LLC
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 37.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Sep, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Out of Memory issue in ProtocolBuffers for cpp and python

A parsing vulnerability for the MessageSet type in the ProtocolBuffers versions prior to and including 3.16.1, 3.17.3, 3.18.2, 3.19.4, 3.20.1 and 3.21.5 for protobuf-cpp, and versions prior to and including 3.16.1, 3.17.3, 3.18.2, 3.19.4, 3.20.1 and 4.21.5 for protobuf-python can lead to out of memory failures. A specially crafted message with multiple key-value per elements creates parsing issues, and can lead to a Denial of Service against services receiving unsanitized input. We recommend upgrading to versions 3.18.3, 3.19.5, 3.20.2, 3.21.6 for protobuf-cpp and 3.18.3, 3.19.5, 3.20.2, 4.21.6 for protobuf-python. Versions for 3.16 and 3.17 are no longer updated.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Google LLCFedora ProjectDebian GNU/Linux
Product-protobuf-cppdebian_linuxfedoraprotobuf-pythonprotobuf-cppprotobuf-pythonprotobuf-cppprotobuf-python
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2021-44695
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-4.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 37.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Dec, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-21 Apr, 2025 | 13:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Affected devices don't process correctly certain special crafted packets sent to port 102/tcp, which could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service in the device.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1507ssimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1214fcsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_cpu_1513pro-2simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511csimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511t-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1512sp-1siplus_s7-300_cpu_314siplus_et_200sp_cp_1543sp-1_isec_tx_rail_firmwaresimatic_et_200_sp_open_controller_cpu_1515sp_pc_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1214c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1211csimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1508s_f_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1510sp-1simatic_s7-1200_cpu_1212csimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1512spf-1simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1513-1simatic_s7-1200_cpu_1212fc_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517-3_pnsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515-2_pn_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517f-3_pn\/dpsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1513r-1simatic_s7-1200_cpu_1215_fcsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1512c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517f-3_pn\/dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1215csimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511-1_pnsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517f-3_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518f-4_pn\/dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518hf-4simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518-4_pn_firmwaresiplus_tim_1531_irc_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518-4_dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516tf-3_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511f-1_pn_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516-3_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518-4_pn\/dp_mfp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517-3_pn\/dpsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517-3simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518t-4_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1508s_fsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_15prof-2_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1513f-1_pnsimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1214c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517-3_pn_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517-3_dpsimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1214csimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1211c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_cpu_1513pro-2_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1214csiplus_tim_1531_ircsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_15prof-2simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516tf-3siplus_s7-300_cpu_315-2_pn\/dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516f-3_pn\/dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_151511f-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1507s_f_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516t-3_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511t-1simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517tf-3simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515-2_pnsimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1214_fcsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515-2_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516pro-2_firmwaretim_1531_irc_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515-2simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516-3_pnsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516pro_f_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516-3simatic_s7-1200_cpu_1214fcsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518f-4_pn\/dpsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1508s_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511f-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1212fcsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_151511c-1simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518tf-4_firmwaresiplus_s7-1200_cp_1243-1simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511f-1_pnsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1507s_fsiplus_s7-300_cpu_315-2_dpsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1513-1_pn_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1215fcsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518f-4simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516pro_fsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1513r-1_firmwaresimatic_et_200_sp_open_controller_cpu_1515sp_pcsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1512c-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1513f-1_pn_firmwaresiplus_et_200sp_cp_1543sp-1_isec_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518-4_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518tf-4simatic_s7-1200_cpu_1214_fc_firmwaresiplus_s7-1200_cp_1243-1_railsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516t-3simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1510sp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518-4_pn\/dp_mfpsiplus_et_200sp_cp_1542sp-1_irc_tx_rail_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1215_fc_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1215fc_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515t-2simatic_s7-1500_cpu_15pro-2simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518-4_pnsimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1212c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1212fc_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511-1_pn_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_15pro-2_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515tf-2_firmwaretim_1531_ircsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_151511c-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1217csimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518-4_pn\/dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1510spsimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1217c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518f-4_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1217csimatic_s7-1500_cpu_151511f-1simatic_s7-1500_software_controller_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511-1simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518-4_dpsiplus_s7-300_cpu_317-2_pn\/dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1215c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1513-1_pnsimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1212c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515f-2_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1217c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1214fc_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_cpu_1513prof-2_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1215csimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515r-2simatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1215fcsiplus_et_200sp_cp_1543sp-1_isecsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1513f-1simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1512csimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516f-3_pn\/dpsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511c-1simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517f-3simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1512spf-1_firmwaresiplus_s7-300_cpu_314_firmwaresiplus_et_200sp_cp_1543sp-1_isec_tx_railsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517tf-3_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516f-3_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517-3_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1214fc_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_software_controllersimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511c-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517-3_dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516-3_pn\/dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518hf-4_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1212csiplus_s7-300_cpu_315-2_pn\/dpsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511f-1siplus_s7-300_cpu_317-2_pn\/dpsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515tf-2siplus_s7-1200_cp_1243-1_rail_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511tf-1simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518-4simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518-4_pn\/dpsiplus_s7-1200_cp_1243-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511tf-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1517-3_pn\/dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516-3_dpsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1508ssiplus_s7-300_cpu_315-2_dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-plcsim_advanced_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1510sp-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516-3_pn\/dpsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515f-2_pn_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515t-2_firmwaresiplus_et_200sp_cp_1542sp-1_irc_tx_railsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516-3_dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1215c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1512sp-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1215fc_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1512c-1simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515f-2simatic_s7-1500_cpu_cpu_1513prof-2simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515f-2_pnsimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1211csimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516f-3simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516-3_pn_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_12_1211c_firmwaresimatic_s7-plcsim_advancedsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1513f-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1212fcsimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1516pro-2simatic_s7-1500_cpu_1515r-2_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1507s_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1513-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518t-4SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1512C-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1517F-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515-2 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511T-1 PNSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DPSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DPSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515TF-2 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1510SP-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1516-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511TF-1 PNSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1515F-2 PNSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1517H-3 PNSIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1510SP F-1 PN RAILSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518HF-4 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 ET 200pro: CPU 1516PRO F-2 PNSIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1512SP-1 PN RAILSIMATIC S7-1500 ET 200pro: CPU 1516PRO-2 PNSIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1510SP-1 PN RAILSIMATIC S7-1500 ET 200pro: CPU 1513PRO-2 PNSIMATIC S7-PLCSIM AdvancedSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1517-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1517H-3 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1516TF-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515T-2 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU S7-1518-4 PN/DP ODKSIMATIC S7-1500 ET 200pro: CPU 1513PRO F-2 PNSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516-3 PN/DP RAILSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516-3 PN/DP TX RAILSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511C-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1517TF-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1515F-2 PN T2 RAILSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1511-1 PN TX RAILSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1513F-1 PNSIMATIC Drive Controller CPU 1507D TFSIMATIC Drive Controller CPU 1504D TFSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1513R-1 PNSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515R-2 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1512SP F-1 PNTIM 1531 IRCSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1511F-1 PNSIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1512SP F-1 PN RAILSIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFPSIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC2 (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1512SP F-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515F-2 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1513-1 PNSIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1510SP F-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU S7-1518F-4 PN/DP ODKSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFPSIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1510SP-1 PNSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516F-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1516T-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518TF-4 PN/DPSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1515R-2 PN TX RAILSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1512SP-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518T-4 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1517T-3 PN/DPSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518HF-4 PNSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1513-1 PNSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1515R-2 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1513F-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1510SP F-1 PNSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1515F-2 PN RAILSIPLUS TIM 1531 IRCSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511F-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1516F-3 PN/DPSIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1512SP-1 PNSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1511-1 PN T1 RAILSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1511-1 PNSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516F-3 PN/DP RAIL
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-3384
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.73% / 72.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Apr, 2024 | 17:06
Updated-24 Jan, 2025 | 15:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PAN-OS: Firewall Denial of Service (DoS) via Malformed NTLM Packets

A vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software enables a remote attacker to reboot PAN-OS firewalls when receiving Windows New Technology LAN Manager (NTLM) packets from Windows servers. Repeated attacks eventually cause the firewall to enter maintenance mode, which requires manual intervention to bring the firewall back online.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Product-pan-osCloud NGFWPAN-OSPrisma Access
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2025-55085
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 38.65%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-17 Oct, 2025 | 14:22
Updated-27 Oct, 2025 | 14:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Web http client: Unchecked Server-Side Malicious Packet Issue

In NextX Duo before 6.4.4, in the HTTP client module, the network support code for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, the parsing of HTTP header fields was missing bounds verification. A crafted server response could cause undefined behavior.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Eclipse Foundation AISBL
Product-threadx_netx_duoNetX Duo
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2025-22868
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 31.10%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Feb, 2025 | 03:07
Updated-01 May, 2025 | 19:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Unexpected memory consumption during token parsing in golang.org/x/oauth2

An attacker can pass a malicious malformed token which causes unexpected memory to be consumed during parsing.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-golang.org/x/oauth2Go
Product-jwsgolang.org/x/oauth2/jws
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2025-10954
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 31.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2025 | 05:00
Updated-03 Oct, 2025 | 18:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Versions of the package github.com/nyaruka/phonenumbers before 1.2.2 are vulnerable to Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input in the phonenumbers.Parse() function. An attacker can cause a panic by providing crafted input causing a "runtime error: slice bounds out of range".

Action-Not Available
Vendor-textitn/a
Product-phonenumbersgithub.com/nyaruka/phonenumbers
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2023-28985
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 39.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jul, 2023 | 16:34
Updated-07 Nov, 2024 | 14:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
SRX Series and MX Series: An FPC core is observed when IDP is enabled on the device and a specific malformed SSL packet is received

An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in Intrusion Detection and Prevention (IDP) of Juniper Networks SRX Series and MX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt of this specific packet will cause a sustained Denial of Service condition. On all SRX Series and MX Series platforms, where IDP is enabled and a specific malformed SSL packet is received, the SSL detector crashes leading to an FPC core. This issue affects Juniper Networks SRX Series and MX Series prior to SigPack 3598. In order to identify the current SigPack version, following command can be used: user@junos# show security idp security-package-version

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-srx345mx2008mx960mx240srx5800srx110srx4000srx550_hmsrx220srx240h2vsrxmx2010mx5srx5400srx100srx3400srx300srx550mx104junosmx80srx240msrx210srx1500srx380srx4200srx340mx10008mx150srx4100mx10srx240mx2020srx3600mx10003srx5000mx10016srx1400mx10000mx204mx480srx320srx5600mx40srx650srx4600csrxsrx550mJunos OSjunos_os
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2025-0638
Matching Score-4
Assigner-NLnet Labs
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-NLnet Labs
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 27.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jan, 2025 | 15:48
Updated-15 Apr, 2026 | 00:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Routinator crashes when illegal characters are present in manifest file names

The initial code parsing the manifest did not check the content of the file names yet later code assumed that it was checked and panicked when encountering illegal characters, resulting in a crash of Routinator.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NLnet Labs
Product-Routinator
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2024-0218
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Nozomi Networks Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Nozomi Networks Inc.
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Apr, 2024 | 15:55
Updated-15 Apr, 2026 | 00:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
DoS on IDS parsing of malformed Radius packets in Guardian before 23.4.1

A Denial of Service (Dos) vulnerability in Nozomi Networks Guardian, caused by improper input validation in certain fields used in the Radius parsing functionality of our IDS, allows an unauthenticated attacker sending specially crafted malformed network packets to cause the IDS module to stop updating nodes, links, and assets. Network traffic may not be analyzed until the IDS module is restarted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Nozomi Networksnozominetworks
Product-Guardianguardian
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2023-32649
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Nozomi Networks Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Nozomi Networks Inc.
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Sep, 2023 | 10:06
Updated-27 Feb, 2025 | 20:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
DoS on IDS parsing of malformed asset fields in Guardian/CMC >= 22.6.0 before 22.6.3 and 23.1.0

A Denial of Service (Dos) vulnerability in Nozomi Networks Guardian and CMC, due to improper input validation in certain fields used in the Asset Intelligence functionality of our IDS, allows an unauthenticated attacker to crash the IDS module by sending specially crafted malformed network packets. During the (limited) time window before the IDS module is automatically restarted, network traffic may not be analyzed.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nozominetworksNozomi Networks
Product-cmcguardianGuardianCMC
CWE ID-CWE-1286
Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found