Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in apasionados DoFollow Case by Case dofollow-case-by-case allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects DoFollow Case by Case: from n/a through <= 3.5.1.
Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects D3600 before 1.0.0.72, D6000 before 1.0.0.72, EX3700 before 1.0.0.70, EX3800 before 1.0.0.70, EX6000 before 1.0.0.30, EX6100 before 1.0.2.24, EX6120 before 1.0.0.40, EX6130 before 1.0.0.22, EX6150v1 before 1.0.0.42, EX6200 before 1.0.3.88, EX7000 before 1.0.0.66, and WN2500RPv2 before 1.0.1.54.
A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Web File Manager's Edit Accounts functionality of Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. By exploiting it, an attacker can take over a user account by changing the password, update users' details, and escalate privileges via RAPR/DefineUsersSet.html.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Loftek Nexus 543 IP Camera allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that change (1) passwords or (2) firewall configuration, as demonstrated by a request to set_users.cgi.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Software License Manager versions prior to 4.4.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
MFScripts YetiShare 3.5.2 through 4.5.3 does not set the SameSite flag on session cookies, allowing the cookie to be sent in cross-site requests and potentially be used in cross-site request forgery attacks.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco HyperFlex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user.
A flaw in the WordPress plugin, WP Maintenance before 5.0.6, allowed attackers to enable a vulnerable site's maintenance mode and inject malicious code affecting site visitors. There was CSRF with resultant XSS.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AresIT WP Compress wp-compress-image-optimizer allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Compress: from n/a through <= 6.30.30.
Apache Geode is vulnerable to CSRF attacks through GET requests to the Management and Monitoring REST API that could allow an attacker who has tricked a user into giving up their Geode session credentials to submit malicious commands on the target system on behalf of the authenticated user. This issue affects Apache Geode: versions 1.10 through 1.15.1 Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.15.2, which fixes the issue.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management screen of Cybozu Remote Service 3.1.8 to 3.1.9 allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of administrators and unintended operations may be performed via unspecified vectors.
An issue was discovered in Serpico (aka SimplE RePort wrIting and CollaboratiOn tool) 1.3.0. It does not use CSRF Tokens to mitigate against CSRF; it uses the Origin header (which must match the request origin). This is problematic in conjunction with XSS: one can escalate privileges from User level to Administrator.
The wp-google-map-plugin plugin before 2.3.10 for WordPress has CSRF in the add/edit category feature.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CreativeMindsSolutions CM Answers cm-answers allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects CM Answers: from n/a through <= 3.3.3.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CreativeMindsSolutions CM Ad Changer cm-ad-changer allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects CM Ad Changer: from n/a through <= 2.0.5.
An issue was discovered in Joomla! before 3.9.13. A missing token check in com_template causes a CSRF vulnerability.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in e4jvikwp VikRestaurants vikrestaurants allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects VikRestaurants: from n/a through <= 1.3.3.
A CSRF vulnerability in Pagekit 1.0.17 allows an attacker to upload an arbitrary file by removing the CSRF token from a request.
A vulnerability in the web-based UI (web UI) of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. If the user has administrative privileges, the attacker could alter the configuration, execute commands, or reload an affected device. This vulnerability affects Cisco devices that are running a vulnerable release of Cisco IOS XE Software with the HTTP Server feature enabled. The default state of the HTTP Server feature is version dependent.
A CSRF issue was discovered in DAViCal through 1.1.8. If an authenticated user visits an attacker-controlled webpage, the attacker can send arbitrary requests in the name of the user to the application. If the attacked user is an administrator, the attacker could for example add a new admin user.
The users-ultra plugin before 1.5.63 for WordPress has CSRF via action=package_add_new to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zucchetti InfoBusiness before and including 4.4.1 allows arbitrary file upload.
In Zmanda Management Console 3.3.9, ZMC_Admin_Advanced?form=adminTasks&action=Apply&command= allows CSRF, as demonstrated by command injection with shell metacharacters. This may depend on weak default credentials.
Sourcecodester Restaurant Management System 1.0 is affected by an admin/staff-exec.php Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability due to a lack of CSRF protection. This could lead to an attacker tricking the administrator into executing arbitrary code or adding a staff entry via a crafted HTML page.
JetBrains YouTrack versions before 2019.1 had a CSRF vulnerability on the settings page.
A vulnerability has been identified in XHQ (All Versions < 6.1). The web interface could allow a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack if an unsuspecting user is tricked into accessing a malicious link.
Sitemagic CMS 4.4.1 is affected by a Cross-Site-Request-Forgery (CSRF) issue as it doesn't implement any method to validate incoming requests, allowing the execution of critical functionalities via spoofed requests. This behavior could be abused by a remote unauthenticated attacker to trick Sitemagic users into performing unwarranted actions.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Report Portal Plugin 0.5 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified bearer token authentication.
Sourcecodester Online Grading System 1.0 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability due to a lack of CSRF protection. This could lead to an attacker tricking the administrator into executing arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page, as demonstrated by a Create User action at the admin/modules/user/controller.php?action=add URI.
The Page Builder by AZEXO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.27.133. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'azh_add_post', 'azh_duplicate_post', 'azh_update_post' and 'azh_remove_post' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create, modify, and delete a post via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
WordPress plugin wp-cleanfix has Remote Code Execution
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ReCorp Export WP Page to Static HTML/CSS plugin <= 2.1.9 versions.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPCS - WordPress Currency Switcher 1.1.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Faraz Quazi Floating Action Button plugin <= 1.2.1 versions.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OG Tags versions prior to 2.0.2 allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of administrators and unintended operation may be performed via unspecified vectors.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in JoomSky JS Job Manager plugin <= 2.0.0 versions.
A vulnerability has been found in Guangdong Pythagorean OA Office System up to 4.50.31 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /note/index/delete. The manipulation of the argument id leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-230458 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tribulant Newsletters plugin <= 4.8.8 versions.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kagemai 0.8.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
A vulnerability in open-webui/open-webui versions <= 0.3.8 allows remote code execution by non-admin users via Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The application uses cookies with the SameSite attribute set to lax for authentication and lacks CSRF tokens. This allows an attacker to craft a malicious HTML that, when accessed by a victim, can modify the Python code of an existing pipeline and execute arbitrary code with the victim's privileges.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Email Template Designer - WP HTML Mail versions prior to 3.0.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
index.php/team_members/add_team_member in RISE Ultimate Project Manager 2.3 has CSRF for adding authorized users.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Browser and Operating System Finder versions prior to 1.2 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator via unspecified vectors.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Arshid Easy Hide Login.This issue affects Easy Hide Login: from n/a through 1.0.8.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Optical BB unit E-WMTA2.3 allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of administrators via a specially crafted page.
The ARMember plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 4.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the arm_check_user_cap function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform multiple unauthorized actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
OSIsoft PI Vision, All versions of PI Vision prior to 2019. The affected product is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery that may be introduced on the PI Vision administration site.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tradebooster Video XML Sitemap Generator.This issue affects Video XML Sitemap Generator: from n/a through 1.0.0.
Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects R6300v2 before 1.0.0.36, AC1450 before 1.0.0.36, R7300 before 1.0.0.54, and R8500 before 1.0.2.94.
Cloud Native Computing Foundation Harbor prior to 1.8.6 and 1.9.3 allows CSRF in the VMware Harbor Container Registry for the Pivotal Platform.