Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ELECOM WRC-300FEBK-A allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators and execute an arbitrary request via unspecified vector. As a result, the device settings may be altered and/or telnet daemon may be started.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ELECOM NCC-EWF100RMWH2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators and execute an arbitrary request via unspecified vector. As a result, the device settings may be altered and/or telnet daemon may be started.
Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are affected by a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the GraphQL API. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized modification of customer metadata by an unauthenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is not required for successful exploitation.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LOGITEC LAN-W300N/PR5B allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via a specially crafted URL. As a result, unintended operations to the device such as changes of the device settings may be conducted.
WordPress WP Cleanfix Plugin 2.4.4 has CSRF
ICE Hrm 26.2.0 is vulnerable to CSRF that leads to user creation via service.php.
Cups Easy (Purchase & Inventory) 1.0 is vulnerable to CSRF that leads to admin account deletion via userdelete.php.
CSRF protection was not present in SquaredUp before version 4.6.0. A CSRF attack could have been possible by an administrator executing arbitrary code in a HTML dashboard tile via a crafted HTML page, or by uploading a malicious SVG payload into a dashboard.
School Management Software PHP/mySQL through 2019-03-14 allows office_admin/?action=deleteadmin CSRF to delete a user.
SOPlanning 1.45 is vulnerable to a CSRF attack that allows for arbitrary user creation via process/xajax_server.php.
A CSRF vulnerability exists in rails <= 6.0.3 rails-ujs module that could allow attackers to send CSRF tokens to wrong domains.
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) prior to 10.1.7.35 and NSM 9.x prior to 9.2.9.55 may allow an attacker to change the configuration of the Network Security Manager via a carefully crafted HTTP request.
A CSRF forgery vulnerability exists in rails < 5.2.5, rails < 6.0.4 that makes it possible for an attacker to, given a global CSRF token such as the one present in the authenticity_token meta tag, forge a per-form CSRF token.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Pluck CMS v4.7.15 allows attackers to delete arbitrary pages.
SAP Cloud Platform Integration for Data Services, version 1.0, allows user inputs to be reflected as error or warning massages. This could mislead the victim to follow malicious instructions inserted by external attackers, leading to Cross Site Request Forgery.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability may impact IBM Curam Social Program Management 7.0.9 and 7.0.10, which is an attack that forces a user to execute unwanted actions on the web application while they are currently authenticated. This applies to a single server class only, with no impact to remainder of web application. IBM X-Force ID: 189151.
Cross-site request forgery in Nagios XI 5.7.3 allows a remote attacker to perform sensitive application actions by tricking legitimate users into clicking a crafted link.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 188898.
The batch id change script (renameObjectsByPaths.py) in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1 allows remote attackers to change the titles of content items by leveraging a valid CSRF token in a crafted request.
phpBB 3.2.8 allows a CSRF attack that can modify a group avatar.
Cross-site request forgery in TCExam 14.2.2 allows a remote attacker to perform sensitive application actions by tricking legitimate users into clicking a crafted link.
IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.0 and 7.6.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 182436.
IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services for Multiplatforms 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NETGEAR switching hubs (GS716Tv2 Firmware version 5.4.2.30 and earlier, and GS724Tv3 Firmware version 5.4.2.30 and earlier) allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators and alter the settings of the device via unspecified vectors.
Cross-site request forgery in Icegram Email Subscribers & Newsletters Plugin for WordPress v4.4.8 allows a remote attacker to send forged emails by tricking legitimate users into clicking a crafted link.
IBM DataPower Gateway 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.16 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 192737.
IBM API Connect 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.1.0 and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.13 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 189840.
IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management Server 11.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 186324.
IBM API Connect 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.1.0 and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.13 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 189841.
IBM Security Guardium Insights 2.0.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 174406.
IBM Tivoli Netcool/OMNIbus 8.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 174910.
IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.3, 11.5, and 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 176268.
In CiviCRM before 5.28.1 and CiviCRM ESR before 5.27.5 ESR, the CKEditor configuration form allows CSRF.
bloofoxCMS 0.5.2.1 is infected with a CSRF Attack that leads to an attacker editing any file content (Locally/Remotely).
The WP-Pro-Quiz WordPress plugin through 0.37 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting a quiz, which could allow an attacker to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary quiz on the blog
An issue was discovered in YzmCMS V5.8. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can add member user accounts via member/member/add.html.
A vulnerability was found in easyii CMS. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/sign/out. The manipulation leads to cross site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
BloofoxCMS 0.5.2.1 allows Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via 'mode=settings&page=editor', as demonstrated by use of 'mode=settings&page=editor' to change any file content (Locally/Remotely).
CSRF in Web Compliance Manager in Quest Policy Authority 8.1.2.200 allows remote attackers to force user modification/creation via a specially crafted link to the submitUser.jsp file. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer
The Delete All Comments Easily WordPress plugin through 1.3 is lacking Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) checks, which could result in an unauthenticated attacker making a logged in admin delete all comments from the blog.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) issue in the NextGEN Gallery plugin before 3.5.0 for WordPress allows File Upload. (It is possible to bypass CSRF protection by simply not including a nonce parameter.)
There is CSRF in the CopySafe Web Protection plugin before 2.6 for WordPress, allowing attackers to change plugin settings.
e107 2.1.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery in plugin-installing, meta-changing, and settings-changing. A malicious web page can use forged requests to make e107 download and install a plug-in provided by the attacker.
Allen Disk 1.6 has CSRF in setpass.php with an impact of changing a password.
CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.1.18 with the nav-social[#] parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Navigation Social can be changed.
HTTP response splitting vulnerability in index.php in phpSysInfo 2.4 and earlier, as used in phpgroupware 0.9.16 and earlier, and egroupware before 1.0.0.009, allows remote attackers to spoof web content and poison web caches via CRLF sequences in the charset parameter.
A vulnerability in the web framework of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CallManager) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against a user of the web interface of the affected software. More Information: CSCvb70021. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(1.11007.2).
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Atahualpa Theme. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely.
A vulnerability was found in Supsystic Popup Plugin 1.7.6 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A vulnerability was found in File Manager Plugin 3.0.1. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely.