Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2019-15042

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-01 Oct, 2019 | 16:41
Updated At-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:34
Rejected At-
Credits

An issue was discovered in JetBrains TeamCity 2018.2.4. It had no SSL certificate validation for some external https connections. This was fixed in TeamCity 2019.1.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:01 Oct, 2019 | 16:41
Updated At:05 Aug, 2024 | 00:34
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

An issue was discovered in JetBrains TeamCity 2018.2.4. It had no SSL certificate validation for some external https connections. This was fixed in TeamCity 2019.1.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2019/09/26/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q2-2019/
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2019/09/26/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q2-2019/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2019/09/26/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q2-2019/
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2019/09/26/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q2-2019/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:01 Oct, 2019 | 17:15
Updated At:07 Oct, 2019 | 20:12

An issue was discovered in JetBrains TeamCity 2018.2.4. It had no SSL certificate validation for some external https connections. This was fixed in TeamCity 2019.1.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

JetBrains s.r.o.
jetbrains
>>teamcity>>2018.2.4
cpe:2.3:a:jetbrains:teamcity:2018.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2019/09/26/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q2-2019/cve@mitre.org
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2019/09/26/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q2-2019/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

143Records found

CVE-2016-3083
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Hive (JDBC + HiveServer2) implements SSL for plain TCP and HTTP connections (it supports both transport modes). While validating the server's certificate during the connection setup, the client in Apache Hive before 1.2.2 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 doesn't seem to be verifying the common name attribute of the certificate. In this way, if a JDBC client sends an SSL request to server abc.com, and the server responds with a valid certificate (certified by CA) but issued to xyz.com, the client will accept that as a valid certificate and the SSL handshake will go through.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-hiveApache Hive
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2013-7450
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 54.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Pulp before 2.3.0 uses the same the same certificate authority key and certificate for all installations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pulpprojectn/a
Product-pulpn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-8337
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Feb, 2019 | 20:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In msmtp 1.8.2 and mpop 1.4.3, when tls_trust_file has its default configuration, certificate-verification results are not properly checked.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-marlamn/a
Product-msmtpmpopn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-19271
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.53% / 66.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Nov, 2019 | 03:33
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD before 1.3.6. A wrong iteration variable, used when checking a client certificate against CRL entries (installed by a system administrator), can cause some CRL entries to be ignored, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proftpdn/a
Product-proftpdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-6071
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Nov, 2019 | 16:44
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 21:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

nuSOAP before 0.7.3-5 does not properly check the hostname of a cert.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nusoap_projectnusoapDebian GNU/Linux
Product-nusoapdebian_linuxnusoap
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-1514
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.07% / 21.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Dec, 2023 | 14:22
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 05:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hitachi Energy Ltd.
Product-rtu500_scripting_interfaceRTU500 Scripting Interface
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16179
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Sep, 2019 | 20:36
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Limesurvey before 3.17.14 does not enforce SSL/TLS usage in the default configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-limesurveyn/a
Product-limesurveyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16281
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 47.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Dec, 2020 | 20:12
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Ptarmigan before 0.2.3 lacks API token validation, e.g., an "if (token === apiToken) {return true;} return false;" code block.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ptarmigan_projectn/a
Product-ptarmigann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-7662
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Feb, 2017 | 08:35
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. iOS before 10.2 is affected. macOS before 10.12.2 is affected. watchOS before 3.1.3 is affected. The issue involves the "Security" component, which allows remote attackers to spoof certificates via unspecified vectors.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_oswatchosmac_os_xn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-38325
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.07% / 76.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jul, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-30 Oct, 2024 | 16:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The cryptography package before 41.0.2 for Python mishandles SSH certificates that have critical options.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cryptography.ion/a
Product-cryptographyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-3762
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2020 | 18:20
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Data Protection Central versions 1.0, 1.0.1, 18.1, 18.2, and 19.1 contains an Improper Certificate Chain of Trust Vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability by obtaining a CA signed certificate from Data Protection Central to impersonate a valid system to compromise the integrity of data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_integrated_data_protection_applianceemc_data_protection_centralData Protection Central
CWE ID-CWE-296
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-20011
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 May, 2021 | 20:09
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libgrss through 0.7.0 fails to perform TLS certificate verification when downloading feeds, allowing remote attackers to manipulate the contents of feeds without detection. This occurs because of the default behavior of SoupSessionSync.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME Project
Product-libgrssn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7468
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.70% / 71.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 16:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In curl and libcurl 7.52.0 to and including 7.53.1, libcurl would attempt to resume a TLS session even if the client certificate had changed. That is unacceptable since a server by specification is allowed to skip the client certificate check on resume, and may instead use the old identity which was established by the previous certificate (or no certificate). libcurl supports by default the use of TLS session id/ticket to resume previous TLS sessions to speed up subsequent TLS handshakes. They are used when for any reason an existing TLS connection couldn't be kept alive to make the next handshake faster. This flaw is a regression and identical to CVE-2016-5419 reported on August 3rd 2016, but affecting a different version range.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-[UNKNOWN]CURL
Product-libcurlcurl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1132
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.30% / 52.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Shoplat App for iOS 1.10.00 through 1.18.00 does not properly verify SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-docomon/a
Product-shoplatn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-27820
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 12.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2025 | 11:44
Updated-04 Jun, 2025 | 11:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache HttpComponents: PSL (Public Suffix List) validation bypass

A bug in PSL validation logic in Apache HttpClient 5.4.x disables domain checks, affecting cookie management and host name verification. Discovered by the Apache HttpClient team. Fixed in the 5.4.3 release

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-Apache HttpComponents
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-45197
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.08% / 23.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Dec, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-14 Apr, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Slixmpp before 1.8.3 lacks SSL Certificate hostname validation in XMLStream, allowing an attacker to pose as any server in the eyes of Slixmpp.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-slixmpp_projectn/a
Product-slixmppn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-12496
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 May, 2019 | 10:59
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Hybrid Group Gobot before 1.13.0. The mqtt subsystem skips verification of root CA certificates by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hybridgroupn/a
Product-gobotn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-45391
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 8.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin 4.8.0.143 and earlier globally and unconditionally disables SSL/TLS certificate and hostname validation for the entire Jenkins controller JVM.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-ns-nd_integration_performance_publisherJenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11727
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 32.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jul, 2019 | 13:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists where it possible to force Network Security Services (NSS) to sign CertificateVerify with PKCS#1 v1.5 signatures when those are the only ones advertised by server in CertificateRequest in TLS 1.3. PKCS#1 v1.5 signatures should not be used for TLS 1.3 messages. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 68.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Mozilla Corporation
Product-firefoxFirefox
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-32574
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.22% / 78.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jul, 2021 | 17:28
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise 1.3.0 through 1.10.0 Envoy proxy TLS configuration does not validate destination service identity in the encoded subject alternative name. Fixed in 1.8.14, 1.9.8, and 1.10.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-consuln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11497
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2019 | 17:24
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Couchbase Server 5.0.0, when an invalid Remote Cluster Certificate was entered as part of the reference creation, XDCR did not parse and check the certificate signature. It then accepted the invalid certificate and attempted to use it to establish future connections to the remote cluster. This has been fixed in version 5.5.0. XDCR now checks the validity of the certificate thoroughly and prevents a remote cluster reference from being created with an invalid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCouchbase, Inc.
Product-couchbase_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29653
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 29.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Apr, 2021 | 16:41
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise 1.5.1 and newer, under certain circumstances, may exclude revoked but unexpired certificates from the CRL. Fixed in 1.5.8, 1.6.4, and 1.7.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-vaultn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29495
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.83%
||
7 Day CHG+0.09%
Published-07 May, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Nim stdlib httpClient does not validate peer certificates by default

Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. In Nim standard library before 1.4.2, httpClient SSL/TLS certificate verification was disabled by default. Users can upgrade to version 1.4.2 to receive a patch or, as a workaround, set "verifyMode = CVerifyPeer" as documented.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nim-langnim-lang
Product-nimsecurity
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29726
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 May, 2022 | 16:25
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3 and IBM Secure External Authentication Server 6.0.3 does not properly ensure that a certificate is actually associated with the host due to improper validation of certificates. IBM X-Force ID: 201104.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-sterling_secure_proxysecure_external_authentication_serverSterling Secure ProxySecure External Authentication Server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-27400
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 40.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Apr, 2021 | 16:48
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise Cassandra integrations (storage backend and database secrets engine plugin) did not validate TLS certificates when connecting to Cassandra clusters. Fixed in 1.6.4 and 1.7.1

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-vaultn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25633
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 52.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 16:43
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Content Manipulation with Double Certificate Attack

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to combine multiple certificate data, which when opened caused LibreOffice to display a validly signed indicator but whose content was unrelated to the signature shown. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25634
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2021 | 13:33
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timestamp Manipulation with Signature Wrapping

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to modify a digitally signed ODF document to insert an additional signing time timestamp which LibreOffice would incorrectly present as a valid signature signed at the bogus signing time. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25636
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect trust validation of signature with ambiguous KeyInfo children

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationFedora Project
Product-fedoralibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-27018
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 27.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Aug, 2021 | 17:56
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The mechanism which performs certificate validation was discovered to have a flaw that resulted in certificates signed by an internal certificate authority to not be properly validated. This issue only affects clients that are configured to utilize Tenable.sc as the vulnerability data source.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aPerforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-remediatePuppet Remediate
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11324
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.45% / 79.98%
||
7 Day CHG-0.12%
Published-18 Apr, 2019 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The urllib3 library before 1.24.2 for Python mishandles certain cases where the desired set of CA certificates is different from the OS store of CA certificates, which results in SSL connections succeeding in situations where a verification failure is the correct outcome. This is related to use of the ssl_context, ca_certs, or ca_certs_dir argument.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCanonical Ltd.Python Software Foundation
Product-ubuntu_linuxurllib3n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1006
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-3.04% / 86.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jul, 2019 | 18:56
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 18:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Windows Identity Foundation (WIF), allowing signing of SAML tokens with arbitrary symmetric keys, aka 'WCF/WIF SAML Token Authentication Bypass Vulnerability'.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016sharepoint_foundationwindows_server_2012windows_8.1windows_rt_8.1identitymodelwindows_7sharepoint_serversharepoint_enterprise_serverwindows_10.net_frameworkwindows_server_2019windows_server_2008WindowsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 R2Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1709 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1803 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.6Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 8.1 for 32-bit systemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1703 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1803 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Microsoft.IdentityModelMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.6/4.6.1/4.6.2/4.7/4.7.1/4.7.2Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)Windows ServerMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise ServerMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows RT 8.1Microsoft SharePoint ServerMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.6/4.6.1/4.6.2Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2016Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 8.1 for x64-based systemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.5.2Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows Server 2019Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows Server 2019Microsoft SharePoint FoundationMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5.1Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server, version 1803 (Server Core Installation)Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1703 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-47619
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 9.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 May, 2025 | 15:12
Updated-28 May, 2025 | 10:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
tranport: TLS host name wildcard matching too lax

syslog-ng is an enhanced log daemo. Prior to version 4.8.2, `tls_wildcard_match()` matches on certificates such as `foo.*.bar` although that is not allowed. It is also possible to pass partial wildcards such as `foo.a*c.bar` which glib matches but should be avoided / invalidated. This issue could have an impact on TLS connections, such as in man-in-the-middle situations. Version 4.8.2 contains a fix for the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-syslog-ng
Product-syslog-ng
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2009-3046
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 35.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Sep, 2009 | 17:00
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 06:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Opera before 10.00 does not check all intermediate X.509 certificates for revocation, which makes it easier for remote SSL servers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a revoked certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOpera
Product-opera_browsern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36478
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 48.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). A NULL algorithm parameters entry looks identical to an array of REAL (size zero) and thus the certificate is considered valid. However, if the parameters do not match in any way, then the certificate should be considered invalid.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm LimitedDebian GNU/LinuxSiemens AG
Product-debian_linuxlogo\!_cmr2040_firmwaresimatic_rtu3031c_firmwaresimatic_rtu3030csimatic_rtu3041c_firmwaresimatic_rtu3041clogo\!_cmr2040simatic_rtu3000clogo\!_cmr2020simatic_rtu3031csimatic_rtu3000c_firmwarelogo\!_cmr2020_firmwaresimatic_rtu3030c_firmwarembed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-6517
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2019 | 19:14
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 06:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Prior to version 0.3.0, chloride's use of net-ssh resulted in host fingerprints for previously unknown hosts getting added to the user's known_hosts file without confirmation. In version 0.3.0 this is updated so that the user's known_hosts file is not updated by chloride.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Perforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-chlorideChloride
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-4436
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2019 | 17:43
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 05:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A certificate validation issue existed in configuration profiles. This was addressed with additional checks. This issue affected versions prior to iOS 12.1.1, tvOS 12.1.1, watchOS 5.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_oswatchostvosiOS, tvOS, watchOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-7143
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.35% / 56.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2019 | 13:04
Updated-25 Nov, 2024 | 18:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Python Twisted 14.0 trustRoot is not respected in HTTP client

Action-Not Available
Vendor-twistedn/a
Product-twistedn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-0534
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.95% / 75.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Aug, 2015 | 10:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite (MES) 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.3, RSA BSAFE Crypto-J before 6.2, RSA BSAFE SSL-J before 6.2, and RSA BSAFE SSL-C 2.8.9 and earlier do not enforce certain constraints on certificate data, which allows remote attackers to defeat a fingerprint-based certificate-blacklist protection mechanism by including crafted data within a certificate's unsigned portion, a similar issue to CVE-2014-8275.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDell Inc.
Product-bsafe_ssl-cbsafebsafe_ssl-jn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-0294
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.58% / 68.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 15:12
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 04:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

GnuTLS before 3.3.13 does not validate that the signature algorithms match when importing a certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GnuTLSRed Hat, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxGNU
Product-debian_linuxgnutlsenterprise_linuxGnuTLS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-38666
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 8.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin 4.8.0.146 and earlier unconditionally disables SSL/TLS certificate and hostname validation for several features.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-ns-nd_integration_performance_publisherJenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1277
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jan, 2021 | 19:56
Updated-12 Nov, 2024 | 20:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Data Center Network Manager Certificate Validation Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted host or construct a man-in-the-middle attack to extract sensitive information or alter certain API requests. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient certificate validation when establishing HTTPS requests with the affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-data_center_network_managerCisco Data Center Network Manager
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-9321
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2020 | 18:14
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

configurationwatcher.go in Traefik 2.x before 2.1.4 and TraefikEE 2.0.0 mishandles the purging of certificate contents from providers before logging.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-traefikn/a
Product-traefikn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-10937
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.38% / 58.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Sep, 2019 | 15:07
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IMAPFilter through 2.6.12 does not validate the hostname in an SSL certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-imapfilter_projectn/aDebian GNU/LinuxopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-debian_linuxfedoraimapfilterbackports_sleleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found