Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2020-13845

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-14 Jul, 2020 | 17:23
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:32
Rejected At-
Credits

Sylabs Singularity 3.0 through 3.5 has Improper Validation of an Integrity Check Value. Image integrity is not validated when an ECL policy is enforced. The fingerprint required by the ECL is compared against the signature object descriptor(s) in the SIF file, rather than to a cryptographically validated signature.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:14 Jul, 2020 | 17:23
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 12:32
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

Sylabs Singularity 3.0 through 3.5 has Improper Validation of an Integrity Check Value. Image integrity is not validated when an ECL policy is enforced. The fingerprint required by the ECL is compared against the signature object descriptor(s) in the SIF file, rather than to a cryptographically validated signature.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://medium.com/sylabs
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/hpcng/singularity/security/advisories/GHSA-pmfr-63c2-jr5c
x_refsource_MISC
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00046.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00059.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00053.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
Hyperlink: https://medium.com/sylabs
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/hpcng/singularity/security/advisories/GHSA-pmfr-63c2-jr5c
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00046.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00059.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00053.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://medium.com/sylabs
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/hpcng/singularity/security/advisories/GHSA-pmfr-63c2-jr5c
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00046.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00059.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00053.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://medium.com/sylabs
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/hpcng/singularity/security/advisories/GHSA-pmfr-63c2-jr5c
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00046.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00059.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00053.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:14 Jul, 2020 | 18:15
Updated At:20 Jan, 2023 | 20:09

Sylabs Singularity 3.0 through 3.5 has Improper Validation of an Integrity Check Value. Image integrity is not validated when an ECL policy is enforced. The fingerprint required by the ECL is compared against the signature object descriptor(s) in the SIF file, rather than to a cryptographically validated signature.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

sylabs
sylabs
>>singularity>>Versions from 3.0.0(inclusive) to 3.5.0(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:sylabs:singularity:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-347Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE-354Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-347
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-354
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00046.htmlcve@mitre.org
Broken Link
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00059.htmlcve@mitre.org
Broken Link
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00053.htmlcve@mitre.org
Broken Link
https://github.com/hpcng/singularity/security/advisories/GHSA-pmfr-63c2-jr5ccve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
https://medium.com/sylabscve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00046.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Broken Link
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00059.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Broken Link
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00053.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Broken Link
Hyperlink: https://github.com/hpcng/singularity/security/advisories/GHSA-pmfr-63c2-jr5c
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://medium.com/sylabs
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

110Records found

CVE-2020-13847
Matching Score-10
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.63% / 45.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jul, 2020 | 17:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Sylabs Singularity 3.0 through 3.5 lacks support for an Integrity Check. Singularity's sign and verify commands do not sign metadata found in the global header or data object descriptors of a SIF file.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sylabsn/a
Product-singularityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
CVE-2020-13846
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.34% / 67.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jul, 2020 | 17:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Sylabs Singularity 3.5.0 through 3.5.3 fails to report an error in a Status Code.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sylabsn/a
Product-singularityn/a
CVE-2021-29499
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.96% / 56.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 May, 2021 | 20:50
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Predictable SIF UUID Identifiers

SIF is an open source implementation of the Singularity Container Image Format. The `siftool new` command and func siftool.New() produce predictable UUID identifiers due to insecure randomness in the version of the `github.com/satori/go.uuid` module used as a dependency. A patch is available in version >= v1.2.3 of the module. Users are encouraged to upgrade. As a workaround, users passing CreateInfo struct should ensure the `ID` field is generated using a version of `github.com/satori/go.uuid` that is not vulnerable to this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sylabssylabs
Product-singularity_image_formatsif
CWE ID-CWE-330
Use of Insufficiently Random Values
CVE-2022-39237
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.48% / 37.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Oct, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 16:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Digital Signature Hash Algorithms Not Validated in sylabs/sif

syslabs/sif is the Singularity Image Format (SIF) reference implementation. In versions prior to 2.8.1the `github.com/sylabs/sif/v2/pkg/integrity` package did not verify that the hash algorithm(s) used are cryptographically secure when verifying digital signatures. A patch is available in version >= v2.8.1 of the module. Users are encouraged to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may independently validate that the hash algorithm(s) used for metadata digest(s) and signature hash are cryptographically secure.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sylabssylabs
Product-singularity_image_formatsif
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-327
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
CVE-2020-15957
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.55% / 71.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jul, 2020 | 13:08
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in DP3T-Backend-SDK before 1.1.1 for Decentralised Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing (DP3T). When it is configured to check JWT before uploading/publishing keys, it is possible to skip the signature check by providing a JWT token with alg=none.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-dp3t-backend-software_development_kit_projectn/a
Product-dp3t-backend-software_development_kitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2002-1706
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.19% / 63.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jun, 2005 | 04:00
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 00:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Cisco IOS software 11.3 through 12.2 running on Cisco uBR7200 and uBR7100 series Universal Broadband Routers allows remote attackers to modify Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) settings via a DOCSIS file without a Message Integrity Check (MIC) signature, which is approved by the router.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ubr7100iosubr7200n/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-45142
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.49% / 38.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Mar, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-06 Mar, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The fix for CVE-2022-3437 included changing memcmp to be constant time and a workaround for a compiler bug by adding "!= 0" comparisons to the result of memcmp. When these patches were backported to the heimdal-7.7.1 and heimdal-7.8.0 branches (and possibly other branches) a logic inversion sneaked in causing the validation of message integrity codes in gssapi/arcfour to be inverted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-heimdal_projectn/a
Product-heimdalSamba
CWE ID-CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
CVE-2020-15827
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.69% / 48.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Aug, 2020 | 20:24
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In JetBrains ToolBox version 1.17 before 1.17.6856, the set of signature verifications omitted the jetbrains-toolbox.exe file.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-toolboxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2024-23456
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zscaler, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zscaler, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 13.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Aug, 2024 | 15:21
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 21:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Signature validation issue leads to Anti-Tampering bypass

Anti-tampering can be disabled under certain conditions without signature validation. This affects Zscaler Client Connector <4.2.0.190 with anti-tampering enabled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Zscaler, Inc.
Product-client_connectorClient Connectorclient_connector
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-15093
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-1.36% / 68.10%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jul, 2020 | 18:45
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper verification of signature threshold in tough

The tough library (Rust/crates.io) prior to version 0.7.1 does not properly verify the threshold of cryptographic signatures. It allows an attacker to duplicate a valid signature in order to circumvent TUF requiring a minimum threshold of unique signatures before the metadata is considered valid. A fix is available in version 0.7.1. CVE-2020-6174 is assigned to the same vulnerability in the TUF reference implementation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-amazonawslabs
Product-toughtough
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-41340
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.46% / 36.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Sep, 2022 | 18:22
Updated-22 May, 2025 | 15:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The secp256k1-js package before 1.1.0 for Node.js implements ECDSA without required r and s validation, leading to signature forgery.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-secp256k1-js_projectn/a
Product-secp256k1-jsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-14515
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.84% / 53.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Sep, 2020 | 19:48
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

CodeMeter (All versions prior to 6.90 when using CmActLicense update files with CmActLicense Firm Code) has an issue in the license-file signature checking mechanism, which allows attackers to build arbitrary license files, including forging a valid license file as if it were a valid license file of an existing vendor. Only CmActLicense update files with CmActLicense Firm Code are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wibun/a
Product-codemeterCodeMeter
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-36360
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 16.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 10:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 8 BM (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V8.3). Affected devices load firmware updates without checking the authenticity. Furthermore the integrity of the unencrypted firmware is only verified by a non-cryptographic method. This could allow an attacker to manipulate a firmware update and flash it to the device.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-logo\!8_bm_fs-05logo\!8_bm_fs-05_firmwarelogo\!_8_bm_firmwarelogo\!8_bmLOGO! 8 BM (incl. SIPLUS variants)
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CWE ID-CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
CVE-2020-13101
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.73% / 49.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Aug, 2020 | 07:04
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In OASIS Digital Signature Services (DSS) 1.0, an attacker can control the validation outcome (i.e., trigger either a valid or invalid outcome for a valid or invalid signature) via a crafted XML signature, when the InlineXML option is used. This defeats the expectation of non-repudiation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-oasis-openn/a
Product-oasis_digital_signature_servicesn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-31172
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 31.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jul, 2022 | 13:55
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 17:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OpenZeppelin Contracts's SignatureChecker may revert on invalid EIP-1271 signers

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.1.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to the SignatureChecker reverting. `SignatureChecker.isValidSignatureNow` is not expected to revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-1271 as expected. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `SignatureChecker` to check the validity of a signature and handle invalid signatures in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openzeppelinOpenZeppelin
Product-contractsopenzeppelin-contracts
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-13415
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.75% / 50.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2020 | 20:48
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller through 5.1. An attacker with any signed SAML assertion from the Identity Provider can establish a connection (even if that SAML assertion has expired or is from a user who is not authorized to access Aviatrix), aka XML Signature Wrapping.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aAviatrix Systems, Inc.
Product-controllern/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-33895
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.26% / 16.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 20:47
Updated-14 Apr, 2026 | 01:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Forge has signature forgery in Ed25519 due to missing S > L check

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.4.0, Ed25519 signature verification accepts forged non-canonical signatures where the scalar S is not reduced modulo the group order (`S >= L`). A valid signature and its `S + L` variant both verify in forge, while Node.js `crypto.verify` (OpenSSL-backed) rejects the `S + L` variant, as defined by the specification. This class of signature malleability has been exploited in practice to bypass authentication and authorization logic (see CVE-2026-25793, CVE-2022-35961). Applications relying on signature uniqueness (i.e., dedup by signature bytes, replay tracking, signed-object canonicalization checks) may be bypassed. Version 1.4.0 patches the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-11093
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.93% / 56.10%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Dec, 2020 | 20:05
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Authorization bypass in Hyperledger Indy

Hyperledger Indy Node is the server portion of a distributed ledger purpose-built for decentralized identity. In Hyperledger Indy before version 1.12.4, there is lack of signature verification on a specific transaction which enables an attacker to make certain unauthorized alterations to the ledger. Updating a DID with a nym transaction will be written to the ledger if neither ROLE or VERKEY are being changed, regardless of sender. A malicious DID with no particular role can ask an update for another DID (but cannot modify its verkey or role). This is bad because 1) Any DID can write a nym transaction to the ledger (i.e., any DID can spam the ledger with nym transactions), 2) Any DID can change any other DID's alias, 3) The update transaction modifies the ledger metadata associated with a DID.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hyperledgerThe Linux Foundation
Product-indy-nodeindy-node
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-11497
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.15% / 62.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Aug, 2020 | 18:25
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in the NAB Transact extension 2.1.0 for the WooCommerce plugin for WordPress. An online payment system bypass allows orders to be marked as fully paid by assigning an arbitrary bank transaction ID during the payment-details entry step.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aWooCommerce
Product-nab_transactn/a
CWE ID-CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
CVE-2023-49079
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.40% / 31.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Nov, 2023 | 18:56
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 21:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Misskey's missing signature validation allows arbitrary users to impersonate any remote user.

Misskey is an open source, decentralized social media platform. Misskey's missing signature validation allows arbitrary users to impersonate any remote user. This issue has been patched in version 2023.11.1-beta.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-misskeymisskey-dev
Product-misskeymisskey
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24884
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.97% / 57.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 May, 2022 | 23:50
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Trivial signature forgery in ecdsautils

ecdsautils is a tiny collection of programs used for ECDSA (keygen, sign, verify). `ecdsa_verify_[prepare_]legacy()` does not check whether the signature values `r` and `s` are non-zero. A signature consisting only of zeroes is always considered valid, making it trivial to forge signatures. Requiring multiple signatures from different public keys does not mitigate the issue: `ecdsa_verify_list_legacy()` will accept an arbitrary number of such forged signatures. Both the `ecdsautil verify` CLI command and the libecdsautil library are affected. The issue has been fixed in ecdsautils 0.4.1. All older versions of ecdsautils (including versions before the split into a library and a CLI utility) are vulnerable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ecdsautils_projectfreifunk-gluonFedora ProjectDebian GNU/Linux
Product-ecdsautilsdebian_linuxfedoraecdsautils
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24771
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.72% / 48.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 13:25
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in node-forge

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code is lenient in checking the digest algorithm structure. This can allow a crafted structure that steals padding bytes and uses unchecked portion of the PKCS#1 encoded message to forge a signature when a low public exponent is being used. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-46234
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.51% / 39.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Oct, 2023 | 14:31
Updated-10 Apr, 2025 | 20:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
browserify-sign vulnerable via an upper bound check issue in `dsaVerify` that leads to a signature forgery attack

browserify-sign is a package to duplicate the functionality of node's crypto public key functions, much of this is based on Fedor Indutny's work on indutny/tls.js. An upper bound check issue in `dsaVerify` function allows an attacker to construct signatures that can be successfully verified by any public key, thus leading to a signature forgery attack. All places in this project that involve DSA verification of user-input signatures will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue has been patched in version 4.2.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-browserifybrowserifyDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxbrowserify-signbrowserify-sign
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24404
Matching Score-4
Assigner-National Cyber Security Centre Netherlands (NCSC-NL)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-National Cyber Security Centre Netherlands (NCSC-NL)
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 12.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Oct, 2023 | 09:31
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 04:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Ciphertext Malleability in TETRA

Lack of cryptographic integrity check on TETRA air-interface encrypted traffic. Since a stream cipher is employed, this allows an active adversary to manipulate cleartext data in a bit-by-bit fashion.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-midnightblueETSI
Product-tetra\TETRA Standard
CWE ID-CWE-353
Missing Support for Integrity Check
CWE ID-CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
CVE-2022-24773
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.88% / 54.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 13:30
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in `node-forge`

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code does not properly check `DigestInfo` for a proper ASN.1 structure. This can lead to successful verification with signatures that contain invalid structures but a valid digest. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-24772
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.01% / 58.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 13:30
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in `node-forge`

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code does not check for tailing garbage bytes after decoding a `DigestInfo` ASN.1 structure. This can allow padding bytes to be removed and garbage data added to forge a signature when a low public exponent is being used. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-9154
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.62% / 72.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2019 | 15:39
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature in OpenPGP.js <=4.1.2 allows an attacker to pass off unsigned data as signed.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openpgpjsn/a
Product-openpgpjsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-9153
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-2.01% / 78.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2019 | 15:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature in OpenPGP.js <=4.1.2 allows an attacker to forge signed messages by replacing its signatures with a "standalone" or "timestamp" signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openpgpjsn/a
Product-openpgpjsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-22253
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 19.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Apr, 2022 | 19:38
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 03:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The DFX module has a vulnerability of improper validation of integrity check values.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect system stability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-magic_uiemuiharmonyosMagic UIHarmonyOSEMUI
CWE ID-CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
CVE-2025-65945
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 9.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Dec, 2025 | 18:45
Updated-09 Mar, 2026 | 21:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
auth0/node-jws improper HMAC signature verification vulnerability

auth0/node-jws is a JSON Web Signature implementation for Node.js. In versions 3.2.2 and earlier and version 4.0.0, auth0/node-jws has an improper signature verification vulnerability when using the HS256 algorithm under specific conditions. Applications are affected when they use the jws.createVerify() function for HMAC algorithms and use user-provided data from the JSON Web Signature protected header or payload in HMAC secret lookup routines, which can allow attackers to bypass signature verification. This issue has been patched in versions 3.2.3 and 4.0.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-auth0auth0
Product-node-jwsnode-jws
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-21134
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-8.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.91% / 55.25%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-28 Jan, 2022 | 19:10
Updated-15 Apr, 2025 | 19:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A firmware update vulnerability exists in the &quot;update&quot; firmware checks functionality of reolink RLC-410W v3.0.0.136_20121102. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to firmware update. An attacker can send a sequence of requests to trigger this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aReolink Innovation Limited
Product-rlc-410w_firmwarerlc-410wn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-3322
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cloudflare, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cloudflare, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.7||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 15.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Oct, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Lock WARP switch bypass on WARP mobile client using iOS quick action

Lock Warp switch is a feature of Zero Trust platform which, when enabled, prevents users of enrolled devices from disabling WARP client. Due to insufficient policy verification by WARP iOS client, this feature could be bypassed by using the "Disable WARP" quick action.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cloudflare, Inc.
Product-warp_mobile_clientWARP
CWE ID-CWE-862
Missing Authorization
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-18672
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.78% / 51.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Dec, 2019 | 17:54
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Insufficient checks in the finite state machine of the ShapeShift KeepKey hardware wallet before firmware 6.2.2 allow a partial reset of cryptographic secrets to known values via crafted messages. Notably, this breaks the security of U2F for new server registrations and invalidates existing registrations. This vulnerability can be exploited by unauthenticated attackers and the interface is reachable via WebUSB.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-shapeshiftn/a
Product-keepkey_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
CVE-2019-17561
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.63% / 73.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Mar, 2020 | 18:44
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The "Apache NetBeans" autoupdate system does not fully validate code signatures. An attacker could modify the downloaded nbm and include additional code. "Apache NetBeans" versions up to and including 11.2 are affected by this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-netbeansgraalvmApache NetBeans
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2005-2182
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.19% / 63.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2005 | 04:00
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 00:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Grandstream BudgeTone (BT) 100 Voice over IP (VoIP) phones do not properly check the Call-ID, branch, and tag values in a NOTIFY message to verify a subscription, which allows remote attackers to spoof messages such as the "Messages waiting" message.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-grandstreamn/a
Product-bt-100_firmwarebt-100n/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2005-2181
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.19% / 63.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2005 | 04:00
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 00:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Cisco 7940/7960 Voice over IP (VoIP) phones do not properly check the Call-ID, branch, and tag values in a NOTIFY message to verify a subscription, which allows remote attackers to spoof messages such as the "Messages waiting" message.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ip_phone_7940_firmwareip_phone_7940ip_phone_7960ip_phone_7960_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-44878
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.90% / 54.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jan, 2022 | 12:52
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

If an OpenID Connect provider supports the "none" algorithm (i.e., tokens with no signature), pac4j v5.3.0 (and prior) does not refuse it without an explicit configuration on its side or for the "idtoken" response type which is not secure and violates the OpenID Core Specification. The "none" algorithm does not require any signature verification when validating the ID tokens, which allows the attacker to bypass the token validation by injecting a malformed ID token using "none" as the value of "alg" key in the header with an empty signature value.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pac4jn/a
Product-pac4jn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2023-39392
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 11.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Aug, 2023 | 11:33
Updated-10 Oct, 2024 | 14:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability of insecure signatures in the OsuLogin module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause OsuLogin to be maliciously modified and overwritten.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-emuiharmonyosHarmonyOSEMUI
CWE ID-CWE-16
Not Available
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-41830
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.35% / 67.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 08:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Double Certificate Attack

It is possible for an attacker to manipulate signed documents and macros to appear to come from a trusted source. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25633 for the LibreOffice advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-openofficeApache OpenOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-23992
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.20% / 9.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jan, 2026 | 02:20
Updated-17 Feb, 2026 | 16:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
go-tuf improperly validates the configured threshold for delegations

go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.3.1, a compromised or misconfigured TUF repository can have the configured value of signature thresholds set to 0, which effectively disables signature verification. This can lead to unauthorized modification to TUF metadata files is possible at rest, or during transit as no integrity checks are made. Version 2.3.1 fixes the issue. As a workaround, always make sure that the TUF metadata roles are configured with a threshold of at least 1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-theupdateframeworktheupdateframework
Product-go-tufgo-tuf
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-41832
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.30% / 66.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 08:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Content Manipulation with Certificate Validation Attack

It is possible for an attacker to manipulate documents to appear to be signed by a trusted source. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25635 for the LibreOffice advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-openofficeApache OpenOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-41831
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.45% / 70.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 08:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timestamp Manipulation with Signature Wrapping

It is possible for an attacker to manipulate the timestamp of signed documents. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25634 for the LibreOffice advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-openofficeApache OpenOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-9793
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 2.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 May, 2026 | 03:44
Updated-03 Jun, 2026 | 18:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Keycloak: keycloak: security policy bypass in jwe-encrypted request object processing

A flaw was found in Keycloak. When a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) encrypted request object is submitted, Keycloak may incorrectly process unsigned claims if the decrypted content is raw JSON, bypassing the configured signature policy. This allows a remote attacker to submit unauthorized claims, leading to a compromise of data integrity within the OpenID Connect (OIDC) authorization flow. While a redirect URI allowlist acts as a compensating control, this vulnerability violates OIDC Core and Financial-grade API (FAPI) signing requirements.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-build_of_keycloakRed Hat Build of Keycloak
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-5050
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 10.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Apr, 2026 | 05:29
Updated-22 Apr, 2026 | 20:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Payment Gateway for Redsys & WooCommerce Lite <= 7.0.0 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature to Unauthenticated Payment Status Manipulation

The Payment Gateway for Redsys & WooCommerce Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in versions up to, and including, 7.0.0 due to successful_request() handlers calculating a local signature but not validating Ds_Signature from the request before accepting payment status across the Redsys, Bizum, and Google Pay gateway flows. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to forge payment callback data and mark pending orders as paid when they know a valid order key and order amount, potentially allowing checkout completion and product or service fulfillment without a successful payment.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jconti
Product-Payment Gateway for Redsys & WooCommerce Lite
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-34433
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.34% / 25.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Aug, 2021 | 17:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.6.4 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M3, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally succeeds without verifying the server side's signature on the client side, if that signature is not included in the server's ServerKeyExchange.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Eclipse Foundation AISBL
Product-californiumEclipse Californium
CWE ID-CWE-322
Key Exchange without Entity Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-33054
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.99% / 57.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 14:40
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

SOGo 2.x before 2.4.1 and 3.x through 5.x before 5.1.1 does not validate the signatures of any SAML assertions it receives. Any actor with network access to the deployment could impersonate users when SAML is the authentication method. (Only versions after 2.0.5a are affected.)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-inversen/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxsogon/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-30130
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 60.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

phpseclib before 2.0.31 and 3.x before 3.0.7 mishandles RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-phpseclibn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxphpseclibn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-29500
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.60% / 43.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 20:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing validation of JWT signature

bubble fireworks is an open source java package relating to Spring Framework. In bubble fireworks before version 2021.BUILD-SNAPSHOT there is a vulnerability in which the package did not properly verify the signature of JSON Web Tokens. This allows to forgery of valid JWTs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bubble_fireworks_projectfxbin
Product-bubble_fireworksbubble-fireworks
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-29455
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.76% / 50.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Apr, 2021 | 19:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing validation of JWT signature in `grassrootza/grassroot-platform`

Grassroot Platform is an application to make it faster, cheaper and easier to persistently organize and mobilize people in low-income communities. Grassroot Platform before master deployment as of 2021-04-16 did not properly verify the signature of JSON Web Tokens when refreshing an existing JWT. This allows to forge a valid JWT. The problem has been patched in version 1.3.1 by deprecating the JWT refresh function, which was an overdue deprecation regardless (the "refresh" flow is no longer used).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-grassrootgrassrootza
Product-grassroot_platformgrassroot-platform
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-28091
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.32% / 67.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Jun, 2021 | 14:39
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 21:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Lasso all versions prior to 2.7.0 has improper verification of a cryptographic signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-entrouvertn/aDebian GNU/LinuxFedora Project
Product-lassodebian_linuxfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found