The VM Backups WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF checks, allowing attackers to make a logged in user unwanted actions, such as update the plugin's options, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue.

The wpDiscuz WordPress plugin before 7.3.4 does check for CSRF when adding, editing and deleting comments, which could allow attacker to make logged in users such as admin edit and delete arbitrary comment, or the user who made the comment to edit it via a CSRF attack. Attackers could also make logged in users post arbitrary comment.

The Accept Donations with PayPal WordPress plugin before 1.3.1 provides a function to create donation buttons which are internally stored as posts. The deletion of a button is not CSRF protected and there is no control to check if the deleted post was a button post. As a result, an attacker could make logged in admins delete arbitrary posts

The తెలుగు బైబిల్ వచనములు WordPress plugin through 1.0 is lacking any CSRF check when saving its settings and verses, and do not sanitise or escape them when outputting them back in the page. This could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change the settings, as well as add malicious verses containing JavaScript code in them, leading to Stored XSS issues

The QR Redirector WordPress plugin before 1.6 does not have capability and CSRF checks when saving bulk QR Redirector settings via the qr_save_bulk AJAX action, which could allow any authenticated user, such as subscriber to change the redirect response status code of arbitrary QR Redirects

The Accept Donations with PayPal WordPress plugin before 1.3.1 offers a function to create donation buttons, which internally are posts. The process to create a new button is lacking a CSRF check. An attacker could use this to make an authenticated admin create a new button. Furthermore, one of the Button field is not escaped before being output in an attribute when editing a Button, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue as well.

The Scroll Baner WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when saving its settings, nor perform any sanitisation, escaping or validation on them. This could allow attackers to make logged in admin change them and could lead to RCE (via a file upload) as well as XSS

The jQuery Reply to Comment WordPress plugin through 1.31 does not have any CSRF check when saving its settings, nor sanitise or escape its 'Quote String' and 'Reply String' settings before outputting them in Comments, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue.

The fitness calculators WordPress plugin before 1.9.6 add calculators for Water intake, BMI calculator, protein Intake, and Body Fat and was lacking CSRF check, allowing attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions, such as change the calculator headers. Due to the lack of sanitisation, this could also lead to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue

The DW Question & Answer Pro WordPress plugin through 1.3.4 does not properly check for CSRF in some of its functions, allowing attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions, such as update a comment or a question status.

The Wechat Reward WordPress plugin through 1.7 does not sanitise or escape its QR settings, nor has any CSRF check in place, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin change the settings and perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks.

The One User Avatar WordPress plugin before 2.3.7 does not check for CSRF when updating the Avatar in page where the [avatar_upload] shortcode is embed. As a result, attackers could make logged in user change their avatar via a CSRF attack

The Per page add to head WordPress plugin before 1.4.4 is lacking any CSRF check when saving its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them. Furthermore, as the plugin allows arbitrary HTML to be inserted in one of the setting (feature mentioned by the plugin), this could lead to Stored XSS issue which will be triggered either in the backend, frontend or both depending on the payload used.

The WP SEO Redirect 301 WordPress plugin before 2.3.2 does not have CSRF in place when deleting redirects, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack

CSRF vulnerability in Headless API in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.107, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to execute any Headless API via the `endpoint` parameter.

The Omnishop plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery on its /users/delete REST route in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.9. The route’s permission_callback only verifies that the requester is logged in, but fails to require any nonce or other proof of intent. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary user accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Internationalization (i18n) Drupal module 5.x before 5.x-2.3 and 5.x-1.1, and 6.x before 6.x-1.0 beta 1, allows remote attackers to change node translation relationships via unspecified vectors.

Concrete CMS prior to 8.5.6 had a CSFR vulnerability allowing attachments to comments in the conversation section to be deleted.Credit for discovery: "Solar Security Research Team"

SRCMS 3.0.0 allows CSRF via admin.php?m=Admin&c=gifts&a=update to change goods prices with the super administrator's privileges.

The Upload Media By URL WordPress plugin before 1.0.8 does not have CSRF check when uploading files, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins upload files (including HTML containing JS code for users with the unfiltered_html capability) on their behalf.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in usamafarooq Woocommerce Gifts Product woo-gift-product allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Woocommerce Gifts Product: from n/a through <= 1.0.0.

Windu CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in user editing functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send POST request that deletes given user. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable. This issue was fixed in version 4.1 build 2250.

Windu CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in file uploading functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send malicious file to the server. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable. This issue was fixed in version 4.1 build 2250.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins requests-plugin Plugin 2.2.12 and earlier allows attackers to create requests and/or have administrators apply pending requests.

Windu CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in user editing functionality. Implemented CSRF protection mechanism can be bypassed by using CSRF token of other user. It is worth noting that the registration is open and anyone can create an account. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable. This issue was fixed in version 4.1 build 2250.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Claim Plugin 2.18.1 and earlier allows attackers to change claims.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Micro Focus Application Performance Management product, affecting versions 9.40, 9.50 and 9.51. The vulnerability could be exploited by attacker to trick the users into executing actions of the attacker's choosing.

A vulnerability was found in jsnjfz WebStack-Guns 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Micro Focus Application Automation Tools Plugin - Jenkins plugin. The vulnerability affects version 6.7 and earlier versions. The vulnerability could allow form validation without permission checks.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the GraphQL API in GitLab since version 13.12 and before versions 13.12.6 and 14.0.2 allowed an attacker to call mutations as the victim

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LOGITEC LAN-W300N/PR5B allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via a specially crafted URL. As a result, unintended operations to the device such as changes of the device settings may be conducted.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Damian BP Disable Activation Reloaded bp-disable-activation-reloaded allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects BP Disable Activation Reloaded: from n/a through <= 1.2.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Md Taufiqur Rahman RIS Version Switcher – Downgrade or Upgrade WP Versions Easily ris-version-switcher allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RIS Version Switcher – Downgrade or Upgrade WP Versions Easily: from n/a through <= 1.0.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ELECOM WRC-300FEBK-A allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators and execute an arbitrary request via unspecified vector. As a result, the device settings may be altered and/or telnet daemon may be started.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LOGITEC LAN-W300N/RS allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via a specially crafted URL. As a result, unintended operations to the device such as changes of the device settings may be conducted.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ELECOM NCC-EWF100RMWH2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators and execute an arbitrary request via unspecified vector. As a result, the device settings may be altered and/or telnet daemon may be started.

The MediaWiki "Report" extension has a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Before fixed version, there was no protection against CSRF checks on Special:Report, so requests to report a revision could be forged. The problem has been fixed in commit f828dc6 by making use of MediaWiki edit tokens.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ELECOM WRC-300FEBK-S allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators and execute an arbitrary request via unspecified vector. As a result, the device settings may be altered and/or telnet daemon may be started.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Storefront Application in DS Data Systems KonaKart before 7.3.0.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change a user email address via an unspecified GET request.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in account-inbox.php in TorrentTrader Classic 1.08 allow remote attackers to perform certain actions as other users, as demonstrated by sending messages.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BlocksWP Theme Builder For Elementor theme-builder-for-elementor allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Theme Builder For Elementor: from n/a through <= 1.2.3.

WordPress WP Cleanfix Plugin 2.4.4 has CSRF

CSRF protection was not present in SquaredUp before version 4.6.0. A CSRF attack could have been possible by an administrator executing arbitrary code in a HTML dashboard tile via a crafted HTML page, or by uploading a malicious SVG payload into a dashboard.

Interaction error between Adobe Flash and multiple Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) services allow remote attackers to perform Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) style attacks by using the Flash navigateToURL function to send a SOAP message to a UPnP control point, as demonstrated by changing the primary DNS server.

SOPlanning 1.45 is vulnerable to a CSRF attack that allows for arbitrary user creation via process/xajax_server.php.

School Management Software PHP/mySQL through 2019-03-14 allows office_admin/?action=addadmin CSRF to add an administrative user.

A CSRF vulnerability exists in rails <= 6.0.3 rails-ujs module that could allow attackers to send CSRF tokens to wrong domains.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Zyxel P-2602HW-D1A router with 3.40(AJZ.1) firmware allow remote attackers to (1) make the admin web server available on the Internet (WAN) interface via the WWWAccessInterface parameter to Forms/RemMagWWW_1 or (2) change the IP whitelisting timeout via the StdioTimout parameter to Forms/rpSysAdmin_1.

School Management Software PHP/mySQL through 2019-03-14 allows office_admin/?action=deleteadmin CSRF to delete a user.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) prior to 10.1.7.35 and NSM 9.x prior to 9.2.9.55 may allow an attacker to change the configuration of the Network Security Manager via a carefully crafted HTTP request.