In parisneo/lollms-webui version v9.8, the lollms_binding_infos is missing the client_id parameter, which leads to multiple security vulnerabilities. Specifically, the endpoints /reload_binding, /install_binding, /reinstall_binding, /unInstall_binding, /set_active_binding_settings, and /update_binding_settings are susceptible to CSRF attacks and local attacks. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to perform unauthorized actions on the victim's machine.

nopCommerce 4.90.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Schedule Tasks functionality.

The Community Events WordPress plugin before 1.5 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting events, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary events via a CSRF attack

A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was discovered in iCMS 7.0.16 which can allow an attacker to execute arbitrary web scripts.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to the use of the HTTP GET method for state-changing operations within admin services, specifically in the event processor of the Carbon console. Although the SameSite=Lax cookie attribute is used as a mitigation, it is ineffective in this context because it allows cookies to be sent with cross-origin top-level navigations using GET requests. A malicious actor can exploit this vulnerability by tricking an authenticated user into visiting a crafted link, leading the browser to issue unintended state-changing requests. Successful exploitation could result in unauthorized operations such as data modification, account changes, or other administrative actions. According to WSO2 Secure Production Guidelines, exposure of Carbon console services to untrusted networks is discouraged, which may reduce the impact in properly secured deployments.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux 3.0 before CP 1531 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to start an update from an arbitrary source via a crafted request to SProtectLinux/scanoption_set.cgi, related to the lack of anti-CSRF tokens.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in katlings pyambic-pentameter. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is 974f21aa1b2527ef39c8afe1a5060548217deca8. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-216498 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

The ContentLock WordPress plugin through 1.0.3 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

The sitetweet WordPress plugin through 0.2 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack

mailcow 0.14, as used in "mailcow: dockerized" and other products, has CSRF.

The Comcast firmware on Cisco DPC3939B (firmware version dpc3939b-v303r204217-150321a-CMCST) devices allows configuration changes via CSRF.

The Nested Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'settingsPage' function and missing santization of the 'tab' parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to call local php files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sean Barton (Tortoise IT) SB Child List plugin <= 4.5 versions.

themegrill-demo-importer before 1.6.3 allows CSRF, as demonstrated by wiping the database.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in version 0.5.0 of imartinez/privategpt allows an attacker to delete all uploaded files on the server. This can lead to data loss and service disruption for the application's users.

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects D6200 before 1.1.00.38, D7000 before 1.0.1.78, JR6150 before 1.0.1.24, R6020 before 1.0.0.42, R6050 before 1.0.1.24, R6080 before 1.0.0.42, R6120 before 1.0.0.66, R6220 before 1.1.0.100, R6260 before 1.1.0.64, R6700v2 before 1.2.0.62, R6800 before 1.2.0.62, R6900v2 before 1.2.0.62, R7450 before 1.2.0.62, and WNR2020 before 1.1.0.62.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in winkm89 teachPress teachpress allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects teachPress: from n/a through <= 9.0.12.

An issue was discovered on D-Link DCS-1130 devices. The device provides a crossdomain.xml file with no restrictions on who can access the webserver. This allows an hosted flash file on any domain to make calls to the device's webserver and pull any information that is stored on the device. In this case, user's credentials are stored in clear text on the device and can be pulled easily. It also seems that the device does not implement any cross-site scripting forgery protection mechanism which allows an attacker to trick a user who is logged in to the web management interface into executing a cross-site flashing attack on the user's browser and execute any action on the device provided by the web management interface which steals the credentials from tools_admin.cgi file's response and displays it inside a Textfield.

GestSup versions up to and including 3.2.60 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability where the application does not verify the authenticity of client requests. An attacker can induce a logged-in user to submit crafted requests that perform actions with the victim's privileges. This can be exploited to create privileged accounts by targeting the administrative user creation endpoint.

The Stetic WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation via the stats_page function found in the ~/stetic.php file, which made it possible for attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in versions up to, and including 1.0.6.

REDCap through 14.9.6 has a security flaw in the Notes section of calendar events, exposing users to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. An attacker can exploit this by luring users into accessing a calendar event's notes, which triggers a logout request and terminates their session. This vulnerability stems from the absence of CSRF protections on the logout functionality, allowing malicious actions to be executed without user consent.

TYPO3 is a free and open source Content Management Framework. A vulnerability has been identified in the backend user interface functionality involving deep links. Specifically, this functionality is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). Additionally, state-changing actions in downstream components incorrectly accepted submissions via HTTP GET and did not enforce the appropriate HTTP method. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires the victim to have an active session on the backend user interface and to be deceived into interacting with a malicious URL targeting the backend, which can occur under the following conditions: The user opens a malicious link, such as one sent via email. The user visits a compromised or manipulated website while the following settings are misconfigured: 1. `security.backend.enforceReferrer` feature is disabled, 2. `BE/cookieSameSite` configuration is set to lax or none The vulnerability in the affected downstream component “Form Framework Module” allows attackers to manipulate or delete persisted form definitions. Users are advised to update to TYPO3 versions 11.5.42 ELTS, 12.4.25 LTS, 13.4.3 LTS which fix the problem described. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

REDCap through 14.9.6 has a security flaw in the Project Dashboards name, exposing users to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. An attacker can exploit this by luring users into clicking on a Project Dashboards name that contains the malicious payload, which triggers a logout request and terminates their session. This vulnerability stems from the absence of CSRF protections on the logout functionality, allowing malicious actions to be executed without user consent.

TYPO3 is a free and open source Content Management Framework. A vulnerability has been identified in the backend user interface functionality involving deep links. Specifically, this functionality is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). Additionally, state-changing actions in downstream components incorrectly accepted submissions via HTTP GET and did not enforce the appropriate HTTP method. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires the victim to have an active session on the backend user interface and to be deceived into interacting with a malicious URL targeting the backend, which can occur under the following conditions: The user opens a malicious link, such as one sent via email. The user visits a compromised or manipulated website while the following settings are misconfigured: 1. `security.backend.enforceReferrer` feature is disabled, 2. `BE/cookieSameSite` configuration is set to lax or none. The vulnerability in the affected downstream component “Backend User Module” allows attackers to initiate password resets for other backend users or to terminate their user sessions. Users are advised to update to TYPO3 versions 11.5.42 ELTS, 12.4.25 LTS, 13.4.3 LTS which fix the problem described.

An issue was discovered on D-Link DCS-1130 devices. The device provides a user with the capability of changing the administrative password for the web management interface. It seems that the device does not implement any cross-site request forgery protection mechanism which allows an attacker to trick a user who is logged in to the web management interface to change the user's password.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mod/user/act_user.php in Garfield Petshop through 2020-10-01 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative accounts.

SuiteCRM through 7.11.21 is vulnerable to CSRF, with resultant remote code execution, via the UpgradeWizard functionality, if a PHP file is included in a ZIP archive.

showdoc is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

UBICOD Medivision Digital Signage 1.5.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that submits a form to the /query/user/itSet endpoint to add a new admin user with elevated privileges.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Codebard CodeBard Help Desk allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects CodeBard Help Desk: from n/a through 1.1.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mikado-Themes PawFriends - Pet Shop and Veterinary WordPress Theme pawfriends allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects PawFriends - Pet Shop and Veterinary WordPress Theme: from n/a through <= 1.3.

IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms 9.1 and 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in brandtoss WP Mailster allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Mailster: from n/a through 1.8.17.0.

On the D-Link DIR-615 before v20.12PTb04, if a victim logged in to the Router's Web Interface visits a malicious site from another Browser tab, the malicious site then can send requests to the victim's Router without knowing the credentials (CSRF). An attacker can host a page that sends a POST request to Form2File.htm that tries to upload Firmware to victim's Router. This causes the router to reboot/crash resulting in Denial of Service. An attacker may succeed in uploading malicious Firmware.

Teedy <= 1.12 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF), due to the lack of CSRF protection.

The Contact Form With Captcha WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation in the ~/cfwc-form.php file during contact form submission, which made it possible for attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in versions up to, and including 1.6.2.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in phpRedisAdmin up to 1.17.3. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 1.18.0 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is b9039adbb264c81333328faa9575ecf8e0d2be94. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216471.

calibre-web is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sabri Taieb Sogrid allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Sogrid: from n/a through 1.5.2.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Streama up to and including v1.10.3. The application does not have CSRF checks in place when performing actions such as uploading local files. As a result, attackers could make a logged-in administrator upload arbitrary local files via a CSRF attack and send them to the attacker.

CSRF was discovered in the web UI in Deluge before 1.3.14. The exploitation methodology involves (1) hosting a crafted plugin that executes an arbitrary program from its __init__.py file and (2) causing the victim to download, install, and enable this plugin.

A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the loginsystem page in PHPGurukul User Registration & Login and User Management System With Admin Panel 2.1.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) and cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Axous 1.1.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add an administrator account via an addnew action to admin/administrators_add.php; or (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the page_title parameter to admin/content_pages_edit.php; the (3) category_name[] parameter to admin/products_category.php; the (4) site_name, (5) seo_title, or (6) meta_keywords parameter to admin/settings_siteinfo.php; the (7) company_name, (8) address1, (9) address2, (10) city, (11) state, (12) country, (13) author_first_name, (14) author_last_name, (15) author_email, (16) contact_first_name, (17) contact_last_name, (18) contact_email, (19) general_email, (20) general_phone, (21) general_fax, (22) sales_email, (23) sales_phone, (24) support_email, or (25) support_phone parameter to admin/settings_company.php; or the (26) system_email, (27) sender_name, (28) smtp_server, (29) smtp_username, (30) smtp_password, or (31) order_notice_email parameter to admin/settings_email.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bastien Ho EELV Newsletter allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects EELV Newsletter: from n/a through 4.8.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Diversified Technology Corp., WPYog, and Gagan Deep Singh DTC Documents allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects DTC Documents: from n/a through 1.1.05.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webTareas version 2.4 and earlier allows a remote attacker to create a new administrative profile and add a new user to the new profile. without the victim's knowledge, by enticing an authenticated admin user to visit an attacker's web page.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in vCita.com Online Booking & Scheduling Calendar for WordPress by vcita allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Online Booking & Scheduling Calendar for WordPress by vcita: from n/a through 4.5.

A vulnerability exists in the HTTP web interface where the web interface does not sufficiently verify if a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This cause a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF), which if exploited could lead an attacker to gain unauthorized access to the web application and perform an unwanted operation on it without the knowledge of the legitimate user. An attacker, who successfully makes an MSM user who has already established a session to MSM web interface clicks a forged link to the MSM web interface, e.g., link is sent per E-Mail, could perform harmful command on MSM through its web server interface. This issue affects: Hitachi Energy MSM V2.2 and prior versions.

The Fancy Product Designer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the FPD_Admin_Import class that makes it possible for attackers to upload malicious files that could be used to gain webshell access to a server in versions up to, and including, 4.7.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mansur Ahamed Ui Slider Filter By Price allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Ui Slider Filter By Price: from n/a through 1.1.