Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2023-29409

Summary
Assigner-Go
Assigner Org ID-1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc
Published At-02 Aug, 2023 | 19:47
Updated At-13 Feb, 2025 | 16:49
Rejected At-
Credits

Large RSA keys can cause high CPU usage in crypto/tls

Extremely large RSA keys in certificate chains can cause a client/server to expend significant CPU time verifying signatures. With fix, the size of RSA keys transmitted during handshakes is restricted to <= 8192 bits. Based on a survey of publicly trusted RSA keys, there are currently only three certificates in circulation with keys larger than this, and all three appear to be test certificates that are not actively deployed. It is possible there are larger keys in use in private PKIs, but we target the web PKI, so causing breakage here in the interests of increasing the default safety of users of crypto/tls seems reasonable.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:Go
Assigner Org ID:1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc
Published At:02 Aug, 2023 | 19:47
Updated At:13 Feb, 2025 | 16:49
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Large RSA keys can cause high CPU usage in crypto/tls

Extremely large RSA keys in certificate chains can cause a client/server to expend significant CPU time verifying signatures. With fix, the size of RSA keys transmitted during handshakes is restricted to <= 8192 bits. Based on a survey of publicly trusted RSA keys, there are currently only three certificates in circulation with keys larger than this, and all three appear to be test certificates that are not actively deployed. It is possible there are larger keys in use in private PKIs, but we target the web PKI, so causing breakage here in the interests of increasing the default safety of users of crypto/tls seems reasonable.

Affected Products
Vendor
Go standard library
Product
crypto/tls
Collection URL
https://pkg.go.dev
Package Name
crypto/tls
Program Routines
  • Conn.verifyServerCertificate
  • Conn.processCertsFromClient
  • Conn.Handshake
  • Conn.HandshakeContext
  • Conn.Read
  • Conn.Write
  • Dial
  • DialWithDialer
  • Dialer.Dial
  • Dialer.DialContext
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 1.19.12 (semver)
  • From 1.20.0-0 before 1.20.7 (semver)
  • From 1.21.0-0 before 1.21.0-rc.4 (semver)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
N/AN/ACWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Type: N/A
CWE ID: N/A
Description: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Mateusz Poliwczak
Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://go.dev/issue/61460
N/A
https://go.dev/cl/515257
N/A
https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/X0b6CsSAaYI/m/Efv5DbZ9AwAJ
N/A
https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2023-1987
N/A
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230831-0010/
N/A
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202311-09
N/A
Hyperlink: https://go.dev/issue/61460
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://go.dev/cl/515257
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/X0b6CsSAaYI/m/Efv5DbZ9AwAJ
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2023-1987
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230831-0010/
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202311-09
Resource: N/A
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://go.dev/issue/61460
x_transferred
https://go.dev/cl/515257
x_transferred
https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/X0b6CsSAaYI/m/Efv5DbZ9AwAJ
x_transferred
https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2023-1987
x_transferred
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230831-0010/
x_transferred
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202311-09
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://go.dev/issue/61460
Resource:
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://go.dev/cl/515257
Resource:
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/X0b6CsSAaYI/m/Efv5DbZ9AwAJ
Resource:
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2023-1987
Resource:
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230831-0010/
Resource:
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202311-09
Resource:
x_transferred
2. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security@golang.org
Published At:02 Aug, 2023 | 20:15
Updated At:25 Nov, 2023 | 11:15

Extremely large RSA keys in certificate chains can cause a client/server to expend significant CPU time verifying signatures. With fix, the size of RSA keys transmitted during handshakes is restricted to <= 8192 bits. Based on a survey of publicly trusted RSA keys, there are currently only three certificates in circulation with keys larger than this, and all three appear to be test certificates that are not actively deployed. It is possible there are larger keys in use in private PKIs, but we target the web PKI, so causing breakage here in the interests of increasing the default safety of users of crypto/tls seems reasonable.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CPE Matches

Go
golang
>>go>>Versions before 1.19.12(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Go
golang
>>go>>Versions from 1.20.0(inclusive) to 1.20.7(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Go
golang
>>go>>1.21.0
cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:1.21.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
Go
golang
>>go>>1.21.0
cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:1.21.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*
Go
golang
>>go>>1.21.0
cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:1.21.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-400Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-400
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://go.dev/cl/515257security@golang.org
Patch
https://go.dev/issue/61460security@golang.org
Issue Tracking
Patch
Vendor Advisory
https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/X0b6CsSAaYI/m/Efv5DbZ9AwAJsecurity@golang.org
Mailing List
Vendor Advisory
https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2023-1987security@golang.org
Patch
Vendor Advisory
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202311-09security@golang.org
N/A
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230831-0010/security@golang.org
N/A
Hyperlink: https://go.dev/cl/515257
Source: security@golang.org
Resource:
Patch
Hyperlink: https://go.dev/issue/61460
Source: security@golang.org
Resource:
Issue Tracking
Patch
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/X0b6CsSAaYI/m/Efv5DbZ9AwAJ
Source: security@golang.org
Resource:
Mailing List
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2023-1987
Source: security@golang.org
Resource:
Patch
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202311-09
Source: security@golang.org
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230831-0010/
Source: security@golang.org
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

156Records found

CVE-2021-36187
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.60% / 68.51%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Nov, 2021 | 18:32
Updated-25 Oct, 2024 | 13:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A uncontrolled resource consumption in Fortinet FortiWeb version 6.4.0, version 6.3.15 and below, 6.2.5 and below allows attacker to cause a denial of service for webserver daemon via crafted HTTP requests

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortiwebFortinet FortiWeb
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2021-23047
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 55.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Sep, 2021 | 13:26
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

On version 16.x before 16.1.0, 15.1.x before 15.1.3.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.3, and all versions of 13.1.x, 12.1.x and 11.6.x, when BIG-IP APM performs Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) verification of a certificate that contains Authority Information Access (AIA), undisclosed requests may cause an increase in memory use. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aF5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_access_policy_managerBIG-IP APM
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-20146
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 30.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jan, 2020 | 19:59
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) 11.0 through 12.6. It allows Uncontrolled Resource Consumption.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabn/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2023-21925
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Oracle
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Oracle
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 37.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Apr, 2023 | 19:54
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 15:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability in the Oracle Health Sciences InForm product of Oracle Health Sciences Applications (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are Prior to 6.3.1.3 and Prior to 7.0.0.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Health Sciences InForm. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Health Sciences InForm. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Oracle Corporation
Product-health_sciences_informHealth Sciences InForm
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-13940
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.60% / 68.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Feb, 2020 | 15:36
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8 PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8F PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8FX PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V4.1), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315T-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317T-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317TF-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319F-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V6 and below CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V7 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC WinAC RTX 2010 (All versions), SIMATIC WinAC RTX F 2010 (All versions), SIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17). Affected devices contain a vulnerability that could cause a denial of service condition of the web server by sending specially crafted HTTP requests to ports 80/tcp and 443/tcp. Beyond the web service, no other functions or interfaces are affected by the denial of service condition.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-simatic_s7-300_cpu_317-2_pn\/dp_firmwaresimatic_winac_rtx_\(f\)_2010siplus_s7-300_cpu_314siplus_s7-300_cpu_315-2_pn\/dp_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1214fcs7-1200_cpu_1215fc_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_319-3_pn\/dpsimatic_s7-300_cpu_317-2_dpsiplus_s7-300_cpu_315-2_pn\/dpsimatic_s7-300_cpu_315-2dp_firmwaresiplus_s7-300_cpu_317-2_pn\/dpsiplus_cpu_1214c_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1214c_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1212c_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_317-2_dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_315-2_pn\/dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-400_pn\/dp_cpu_firmwaresiplus_cpu_1211csiplus_s7-300_cpu_317-2_pn\/dp_firmwaresiplus_s7-300_cpu_315-2_dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-400_pn\/dp_cpus7-1200_cpu_1215csiplus_cpu_1215c_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1211c_firmwaresiplus_cpu_1212c_firmwaresiplus_cpu_1214csimatic_s7-300_cpu_317-2_pn\/dps7-1200_cpu_1212cs7-1200_cpu_1217c_firmwaresiplus_s7-1200simatic_s7-300_cpu_315-2dpsiplus_s7-300_cpu_315-2_dpsiplus_cpu_1211c_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_315-2_pn\/dpsiplus_cpu_1215cs7-1200_cpu_1212fc_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1212fcsimatic_s7-300_cpu_319-3_pn\/dp_firmwaresiplus_s7-300_cpu_314_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1215fcs7-1200_cpu_1211cs7-1200_cpu_1215c_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1214csiplus_cpu_1212cs7-1200_cpu_1217cs7-1200_cpu_1214fc_firmwaresiplus_s7-1200_firmwareSIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8F PN/DP CPUSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317T-3 PN/DPSIMATIC WinAC RTX 2010SIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPUSIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPUSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC WinAC RTX F 2010SIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPUSIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V7 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V6 and below CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DPSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317TF-3 PN/DPSIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPUSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DPSIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8 PN/DP CPUSIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8FX PN/DP CPUSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315T-3 PN/DPSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319F-3 PN/DPSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2021-35559
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Oracle
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Oracle
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 26.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Oct, 2021 | 10:50
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability in the Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: Swing). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 7u311, 8u301, 11.0.12, 17; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.3 and 21.2.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability can also be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxNetApp, Inc.Oracle CorporationFedora Project
Product-openjdkdebian_linuxgraalvmsnapmanagerhci_management_nodee-series_santricity_os_controlleractive_iq_unified_managere-series_santricity_storage_managerfedorae-series_santricity_web_servicesoncommand_workflow_automationsolidfiresantricity_unified_manageroncommand_insightJava SE JDK and JREjdkjava_sejre
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2025-32472
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SICK AG
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SICK AG
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 46.10%
||
7 Day CHG+0.05%
Published-28 Apr, 2025 | 12:04
Updated-29 Apr, 2025 | 13:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
DoS attack by conducting a slowloris-type attack

The multiScan and picoScan are vulnerable to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by conducting a Slowloris-type attack, causing the web page to become unresponsive.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SICK AG
Product-SICK picoScan1XXSICK multiScan1XX
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2025-30476
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 May, 2025 | 18:45
Updated-16 May, 2025 | 18:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell PowerScale InsightIQ, version 5.2, contains an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-PowerScale InsightIQ
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2022-45044
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Dec, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 14:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SA84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SD84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (All versions < V9.50 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (All versions < V9.50 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.50). Affected devices do not properly restrict secure client-initiated renegotiations within the SSL and TLS protocols. This could allow an attacker to create a denial of service condition on the ports 443/tcp and 4443/tcp for the duration of the attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-siprotec_5_7ut85_firmwaresiprotec_5_6md85_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sl82siprotec_5_7sl86siprotec_5_communication_module_ethba2el_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sj81siprotec_5_7sl87siprotec_5_7sj85siprotec_5_7sd82_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sl87_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sk85siprotec_5_7sx85_firmwaresiprotec_5_7ut85siprotec_5_communication_module_ethbb2fosiprotec_5_7sj86siprotec_5_7st85siprotec_5_7sj82siprotec_5_7sk85_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sj86_firmwaresiprotec_5_7ut87_firmwaresiprotec_5_7ut82_firmwaresiprotec_5_communication_module_ethbd2fosiprotec_5_7vk87siprotec_5_6md86siprotec_5_7ut86_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sd87siprotec_5_7um85siprotec_5_6md85siprotec_5_communication_module_ethbd2fo_firmwaresiprotec_5_7st85_firmwaresiprotec_5_7ss85_firmwaresiprotec_5_7ve85_firmwaresiprotec_5_compact_7sx800_firmwaresiprotec_5_7ss85siprotec_5_7um85_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sj81_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sk82_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sa86siprotec_5_7sd86_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sa82siprotec_5_7ut82siprotec_5_communication_module_ethbb2fo_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sd82siprotec_5_7sd86siprotec_5_7sj85_firmwaresiprotec_5_7ke85siprotec_5_6md86_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sa86_firmwaresiprotec_5_6mu85_firmwaresiprotec_5_7ut86siprotec_5_7sk82siprotec_5_7ut87siprotec_5_7sj82_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sa82_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sd87_firmwaresiprotec_5_communication_module_ethba2elsiprotec_5_7ve85siprotec_5_7sa87siprotec_5_6md89siprotec_5_6md89_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sx85siprotec_5_7vk87_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sl86_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sl82_firmwaresiprotec_5_7sa87_firmwaresiprotec_5_6mu85siprotec_5_compact_7sx800siprotec_5_7ke85_firmwareSIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FOSIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150)SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2ELSIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150)SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100)SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150)SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150)SIPROTEC 5 7SD84 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150)SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150)SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050)SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100)SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100)SIPROTEC 5 7SA84 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150)SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FOSIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150)SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100)SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100)SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100)SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP200)SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100)SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300)SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300)
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2025-2833
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 33.92%
||
7 Day CHG-0.06%
Published-27 Mar, 2025 | 04:00
Updated-01 Apr, 2025 | 15:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
zhangyd-c OneBlog HTTP Header redos

A vulnerability was found in zhangyd-c OneBlog up to 2.3.9. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the component HTTP Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to inefficient regular expression complexity. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-zhydzhangyd-c
Product-oneblogOneBlog
CWE ID-CWE-1333
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2016-0747
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-21.44% / 95.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Feb, 2016 | 19:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The resolver in nginx before 1.8.1 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 does not properly limit CNAME resolution, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (worker process resource consumption) via vectors related to arbitrary name resolution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aopenSUSEApple Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxF5, Inc.Canonical Ltd.
Product-nginxleapubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxxcoden/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2022-41952
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 16:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Matrix Synapse

Synapse before 1.52.0 with URL preview functionality enabled will attempt to generate URL previews for media stream URLs without properly limiting connection time. Connections will only be terminated after `max_spider_size` (default: 10M) bytes have been downloaded, which can in some cases lead to long-lived connections towards the streaming media server (for instance, Icecast). This can cause excessive traffic and connections toward such servers if their stream URL is, for example, posted to a large room with many Synapse instances with URL preview enabled. Version 1.52.0 implements a timeout mechanism which will terminate URL preview connections after 30 seconds. Since generating URL previews for media streams is not supported and always fails, 1.53.0 additionally implements an allow list for content types for which Synapse will even attempt to generate a URL preview. Upgrade to 1.53.0 to fully resolve the issue. As a workaround, turn off URL preview functionality by setting `url_preview_enabled: false` in the Synapse configuration file.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Matrix.org Foundation
Product-synapsesynapse
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-772
Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
CVE-2019-11387
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.46% / 63.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2019 | 01:14
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set (CRS) through 3.1.0. /rules/REQUEST-942-APPLICATION-ATTACK-SQLI.conf allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (ReDOS) by entering a specially crafted string with nested repetition operators.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-modsecurityn/a
Product-owasp_modsecurity_core_rule_setn/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2022-41968
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-3.5||LOW
EPSS-0.09% / 26.26%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-01 Dec, 2022 | 20:38
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 16:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Nextcloud Server's calendar name length not validated before writing to database

Nextcloud Server is an open source personal cloud server. Prior to versions 23.0.10 and 24.0.5, calendar name lengths are not validated before writing to a database. As a result, an attacker can send unnecessary amounts of data against the database. Version 23.0.10 and 24.0.5 contain patches for the issue. No known workarounds are available.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Nextcloud GmbH
Product-nextcloud_serversecurity-advisories
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-1284
Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
CVE-2021-32053
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.45% / 62.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 May, 2021 | 20:43
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

JPA Server in HAPI FHIR before 5.4.0 allows a user to deny service (e.g., disable access to the database after the attack stops) via history requests. This occurs because of a SELECT COUNT statement that requires a full index scan, with an accompanying large amount of server resources if there are many simultaneous history requests.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fhirn/a
Product-hapi_fhirn/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2021-32640
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.47% / 63.43%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-25 May, 2021 | 18:25
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ReDoS in Sec-Websocket-Protocol header

ws is an open source WebSocket client and server library for Node.js. A specially crafted value of the `Sec-Websocket-Protocol` header can be used to significantly slow down a ws server. The vulnerability has been fixed in ws@7.4.6 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/00c425ec77993773d823f018f64a5c44e17023ff). In vulnerable versions of ws, the issue can be mitigated by reducing the maximum allowed length of the request headers using the [`--max-http-header-size=size`](https://nodejs.org/api/cli.html#cli_max_http_header_size_size) and/or the [`maxHeaderSize`](https://nodejs.org/api/http.html#http_http_createserver_options_requestlistener) options.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ws_projectwebsocketsNetApp, Inc.
Product-e-series_performance_analyzerwsws
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-23814
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.20% / 42.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Feb, 2025 | 10:28
Updated-10 Jul, 2025 | 10:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The integrated ICMP service of the network stack of affected devices can be forced to exhaust its available memory resources when receiving specially crafted messages targeting IP fragment re-assembly. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a temporary denial of service condition of the ICMP service, other communication services are not affected. Affected devices will resume normal operation after the attack terminates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLYSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319F-3 PN/DPSIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1512SP F-1 PNSIMATIC TDC CPU555SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DCSIMATIC ET 200pro IM 154-4 PN HFSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DCSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DPSIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF TX RAILSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DPSIWAREX WP241SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLYSIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HFSIPLUS ET 200S IM151-3 PN HFSIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1512SP F-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/DCSIMATIC ET 200AL IM 157-1 PNSIMATIC S7-410 V10 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319-3 PN/DPSIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN/2 HFSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1513-1 PNSIDOOR ATD430WSIPLUS ET 200S IM 151-8F PN/DP CPUSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511-1 PNSIMATIC ET 200S IM 151-3 PN FOSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315T-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DCSIPLUS NET PN/PN CouplerSIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN ST BA TX RAILSIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN ST BASIMATIC ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN STSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C AC/DC/RlySIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1512SP-1 PNSIWAREX WP521 STSIMATIC ET 200S IM 151-8 PN/DP CPUSIMATIC Power Line Booster PLB, Modem Module STSIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN ST BASIMATIC CFU DIQSIPLUS HCS4200 CIM4210CSINUMERIK 840D slSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DCSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1516F-3 PN/DPSIPLUS ET 200M IM 153-4 PN IO STSIPLUS HCS4300 CIM4310SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DCSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1511-1 PNSIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN BASIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317T-3 PN/DPSIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HFSIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HF T1 RAILSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DPSIMATIC PN/PN CouplerSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/RlySIMATIC ET 200M IM 153-4 PN IO HFSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DPSIMATIC ET 200pro IM 154-3 PN HFSIPLUS ET 200M IM 153-4 PN IO HFSIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN ST TX RAILSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C AC/DC/RlySIPLUS ET 200S IM 151-8 PN/DP CPUSIMATIC ET 200pro IM 154-8FX PN/DP CPUSIMATIC ET 200S IM 151-3 PN STSIMATIC CFU PASIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC RAILSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DCSIMATIC ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN BASIDOOR ATE530S COATEDSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DCSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516F-3 PN/DPSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLYSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLYSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515F-2 PNSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/RLYSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLYSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1513F-1 PNSIMOCODE pro V PROFINETSIWAREX WP522 STSIMATIC S7-400 H V6 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC ET 200S IM 151-3 PN HSSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/DCSIPLUS HCS4200 CIM4210SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/RlySIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/RlySIMATIC ET 200S IM 151-8F PN/DP CPUSIMATIC ET 200pro IM 154-8 PN/DP CPUSIMOCODE pro V Ethernet/IP (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1513-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/RlySIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/RlySIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V7 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLYSIMATIC Power Line Booster PLB, Base ModuleSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511F-1 PNSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317TF-3 PN/DPSIMATIC ET 200S IM 151-3 PN HFSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC RAILSIWAREX WP251SIMATIC TDC CP51M1SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DPSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C AC/DC/RlySIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN STSIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN STSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1511F-1 PNSIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1510SP-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C AC/DC/RlySIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DCSIWAREX WP231SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1217C DC/DC/DCSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1516-3 PN/DPSIDOOR ATE530G COATEDSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DCSIPLUS ET 200S IM151-3 PN STSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1513F-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/RlySIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515-2 PNSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DCSIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN/3 HFSIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN STSIMATIC ET 200M IM 153-4 PN IO STSIMATIC ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HFSIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HA (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/RlySIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DPSIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HSSIMATIC S7-410 V8 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DCSIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 MF HFSIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN ST TX RAILSIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HFSIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF T1 RAILSIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1510SP F-1 PNSIMATIC ET 200pro IM 154-8F PN/DP CPU
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-11391
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.41% / 60.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2019 | 01:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set (CRS) through 3.1.0. /rules/REQUEST-933-APPLICATION-ATTACK-PHP.conf allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (ReDOS) by entering a specially crafted string with $a# at the beginning and nested repetition operators. NOTE: the software maintainer disputes that this is a vulnerability because the issue cannot be exploited via ModSecurity

Action-Not Available
Vendor-modsecurityn/a
Product-owasp_modsecurity_core_rule_setn/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2025-0704
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulDB
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 23.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Jan, 2025 | 18:31
Updated-24 Jan, 2025 | 20:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
JoeyBling bootplus QrCodeController.java qrCode resource consumption

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in JoeyBling bootplus up to 247d5f6c209be1a5cf10cd0fa18e1d8cc63cf55d. Affected is the function qrCode of the file src/main/java/io/github/controller/QrCodeController.java. The manipulation of the argument w/h leads to resource consumption. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-JoeyBling
Product-bootplus
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-404
Improper Resource Shutdown or Release
CVE-2024-9823
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.80% / 73.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Oct, 2024 | 15:03
Updated-30 Jul, 2025 | 19:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Jetty DOS vulnerability on DosFilter

There exists a security vulnerability in Jetty's DosFilter which can be exploited by unauthorized users to cause remote denial-of-service (DoS) attack on the server using DosFilter. By repeatedly sending crafted requests, attackers can trigger OutofMemory errors and exhaust the server's memory finally.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Eclipse JettyEclipse Foundation AISBLNetApp, Inc.
Product-bootstrap_osjettyhci_compute_nodeactive_iq_unified_managerJettyjetty
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-8454
Matching Score-4
Assigner-TWCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-TWCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 48.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Sep, 2024 | 07:18
Updated-04 Oct, 2024 | 15:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PLANET Technology switch devices - Swctrl service DoS attack

The swctrl service is used to detect and remotely manage PLANET Technology devices. Certain switch models have a Denial-of-Service vulnerability in the swctrl service, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to send crafted packets that can crash the service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-planetPLANET Technologyplanet_technology_corp
Product-gs-4210-24p2s_firmwaregs-4210-24pl4cgs-4210-24pl4c_firmwaregs-4210-24p2sGS-4210-24P2S hardware 3.0IGS-5225-4UP1T2S hardware 1.0GS-4210-24PL4C hardware 2.0gs-4210-24pl4c_hardware_2.0gs-4210-24pl4c_hardware_3.0igs-5225-4up1t2s_hardware_1.0
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2021-23053
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.87% / 74.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Sep, 2021 | 12:28
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

On version 15.1.x before 15.1.3, 14.1.x before 14.1.3.1, and 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, when the brute force protection feature of BIG-IP Advanced WAF or BIG-IP ASM is enabled on a virtual server and the virtual server is under brute force attack, the MySQL database may run out of disk space due to lack of row limit on undisclosed tables in the MYSQL database. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aF5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewallbig-ip_application_security_managerBIG-IP Advanced WAF and BIG-IP ASM
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-6838
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.56%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-20 Mar, 2025 | 10:09
Updated-01 Apr, 2025 | 20:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in mlflow/mlflow

In mlflow/mlflow version v2.13.2, a vulnerability exists that allows the creation or renaming of an experiment with a large number of integers in its name due to the lack of a limit on the experiment name. This can cause the MLflow UI panel to become unresponsive, leading to a potential denial of service. Additionally, there is no character limit in the `artifact_location` parameter while creating the experiment.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lfprojectsmlflow
Product-mlflowmlflow/mlflow
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-11048
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PHP Group
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PHP Group
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-7.58% / 91.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 May, 2020 | 07:15
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Temporary files are not cleaned after OOM when parsing HTTP request data

In PHP versions 7.2.x below 7.2.31, 7.3.x below 7.3.18 and 7.4.x below 7.4.6, when HTTP file uploads are allowed, supplying overly long filenames or field names could lead PHP engine to try to allocate oversized memory storage, hit the memory limit and stop processing the request, without cleaning up temporary files created by upload request. This potentially could lead to accumulation of uncleaned temporary files exhausting the disk space on the target server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The PHP Group
Product-phpPHP
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-190
Integer Overflow or Wraparound
CVE-2024-42398
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 50.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Aug, 2024 | 19:37
Updated-24 Mar, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Unauthenticated Denial-of-Service (DoS) Vulnerabilities in the Soft AP Daemon Service Accessed by the PAPI Protocol

Multiple unauthenticated Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerabilities exist in the Soft AP daemon accessed via the PAPI protocol. Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities results in the ability to interrupt the normal operation of the affected Access Point.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)HP Inc.Aruba Networks
Product-arubaosinstantosHPE Aruba Networking InstantOS and Aruba Access Points running ArubaOS 10arubaosinstant
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-42399
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 50.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Aug, 2024 | 19:48
Updated-13 Mar, 2025 | 14:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Unauthenticated Denial-of-Service (DoS) Vulnerabilities in the Soft AP Daemon Service Accessed by the PAPI Protocol

Multiple unauthenticated Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerabilities exist in the Soft AP daemon accessed via the PAPI protocol. Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities results in the ability to interrupt the normal operation of the affected Access Point.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-HP Inc.Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)Aruba Networks
Product-instantosarubaosHPE Aruba Networking InstantOS and Aruba Access Points running ArubaOS 10instantarubaos
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-42397
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 38.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Aug, 2024 | 18:51
Updated-19 Mar, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Unauthenticated Denial-of-Service (DoS) Vulnerabilities in the AP Certificate Management Service Accessed by the PAPI Protocol

Multiple unauthenticated Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerabilities exist in the AP Certificate Management daemon accessed via the PAPI protocol. Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities results in the ability to interrupt the normal operation of the affected Access Point.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-HP Inc.Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
Product-instantosHPE Aruba Networking InstantOS and Aruba Access Points running ArubaOS 10
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-41946
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.97% / 82.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2024 | 14:22
Updated-17 Jan, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
REXML DoS vulnerability

REXML is an XML toolkit for Ruby. The REXML gem 3.3.2 has a DoS vulnerability when it parses an XML that has many entity expansions with SAX2 or pull parser API. The REXML gem 3.3.3 or later include the patch to fix the vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ruby
Product-rexmlrexmlrexml
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-41123
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.42% / 61.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2024 | 14:18
Updated-27 Dec, 2024 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
REXML DoS vulnerability

REXML is an XML toolkit for Ruby. The REXML gem before 3.3.2 has some DoS vulnerabilities when it parses an XML that has many specific characters such as whitespace character, `>]` and `]>`. The REXML gem 3.3.3 or later include the patches to fix these vulnerabilities.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ruby
Product-rexmlrexmlrexml
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-38520
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 27.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jun, 2024 | 18:59
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 04:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
SoftEther VPN with L2TP - 2.75x Amplification

SoftEtherVPN is a an open-source cross-platform multi-protocol VPN Program. When SoftEtherVPN is deployed with L2TP enabled on a device, it introduces the possibility of the host being used for amplification/reflection traffic generation because it will respond to every packet with two response packets that are larger than the request packet size. These sorts of techniques are used by external actors who generate spoofed source IPs to target a destination on the internet. This vulnerability has been patched in version 5.02.5185.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SoftEtherVPNsoftether
Product-SoftEtherVPNvpn
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-38828
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Nov, 2024 | 03:45
Updated-09 May, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
CVE-2024-38828: DoS via Spring MVC controller method with byte[] parameter

Spring MVC controller methods with an @RequestBody byte[] method parameter are vulnerable to a DoS attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-VMware (Broadcom Inc.)
Product-Springspring
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-35176
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.57% / 87.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 May, 2024 | 15:13
Updated-07 Mar, 2025 | 01:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
REXML contains a denial of service vulnerability

REXML is an XML toolkit for Ruby. The REXML gem before 3.2.6 has a denial of service vulnerability when it parses an XML that has many `<`s in an attribute value. Those who need to parse untrusted XMLs may be impacted to this vulnerability. The REXML gem 3.2.7 or later include the patch to fix this vulnerability. As a workaround, don't parse untrusted XMLs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ruby
Product-rexmlrexml
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2022-39158
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.29% / 51.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Sep, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-12 Aug, 2025 | 12:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i800NC, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i801NC, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i802NC, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM i803NC, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100F, RUGGEDCOM M2100NC, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200F, RUGGEDCOM M2200NC, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969F, RUGGEDCOM M969NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC30NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RP110NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600FNC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS1600TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400F, RUGGEDCOM RS400NC, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS401NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416F, RUGGEDCOM RS416NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PF, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNC, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000ANC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000HNC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000NC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS8000TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900F, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GF, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPF, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS910NC, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GF, RUGGEDCOM RS940GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RS969NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RSL910NC, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. Affected devices improperly handle partial HTTP requests which makes them vulnerable to slowloris attacks. This could allow a remote attacker to create a denial of service condition that persists until the attack ends.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-ruggedcom_rsg2100_\(32m\)ruggedcom_rsg2300pruggedcom_rsg907rruggedcom_rst916pruggedcom_rsg910cruggedcom_rsl910ruggedcom_rs900_\(32m\)ruggedcom_rosruggedcom_rsg920pruggedcom_rsg2300ruggedcom_rs416v2ruggedcom_rst916cruggedcom_rst2228ruggedcom_rst2228pruggedcom_rmc8388ruggedcom_rsg909rruggedcom_rsg908cruggedcom_rs416pv2ruggedcom_rsg2488ruggedcom_rsg2288ruggedcom_rs900g_\(32m\)RUGGEDCOM RS8000RUGGEDCOM RS900LRUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX-C01RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS401NCRUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS920LNCRUGGEDCOM RS910LRUGGEDCOM RS930WRUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600RUGGEDCOM i801NCRUGGEDCOM RS940GRUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM i800NCRUGGEDCOM RS910RUGGEDCOM RSG908CRUGGEDCOM RS8000NCRUGGEDCOM RS400FRUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS920LRUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS8000HRUGGEDCOM RS900LNCRUGGEDCOM RS8000TRUGGEDCOM RS910NCRUGGEDCOM RS416PFRUGGEDCOM RS900GRUGGEDCOM M2100FRUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XXRUGGEDCOM RS900WRUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XXRUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG910CRUGGEDCOM RSG2300PFRUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600NCRUGGEDCOM RS969RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG909RRUGGEDCOM RS416FRUGGEDCOM RS900GPFRUGGEDCOM RSG2100PRUGGEDCOM RS930LNCRUGGEDCOM RS416PRUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2200NCRUGGEDCOM RS8000HNCRUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600FRUGGEDCOM RS416NCRUGGEDCOM RS930LRUGGEDCOM RSG907RRUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS910WRUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS940GNCRUGGEDCOM RS900GNCRUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS940GFRUGGEDCOM RS910LNCRUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RMC30RUGGEDCOM RS900GFRUGGEDCOM RS8000ANCRUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600TRUGGEDCOM M969FRUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS400NCRUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-C01RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V4.XRUGGEDCOM M2200FRUGGEDCOM RP110RUGGEDCOM i801RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS8000TNCRUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS920WRUGGEDCOM RS900FRUGGEDCOM M2200RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-XXRUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS900RUGGEDCOM RSG2100RUGGEDCOM M969NCRUGGEDCOM RS416PNCRUGGEDCOM RS1600FNCRUGGEDCOM RS400RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600TNCRUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM M969RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V4.XRUGGEDCOM M2200NCRUGGEDCOM RS8000ARUGGEDCOM i803RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNCRUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100NCRUGGEDCOM RSG2488FRUGGEDCOM RP110NCRUGGEDCOM RSG2200RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSL910NCRUGGEDCOM RS969NCRUGGEDCOM RS416RUGGEDCOM RST2228PRUGGEDCOM i800RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XXRUGGEDCOM RST916PRUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSL910RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PFRUGGEDCOM RS900GPRUGGEDCOM RST916CRUGGEDCOM RS900GPNCRUGGEDCOM RSG2100FRUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.XRUGGEDCOM i802RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RST2228RUGGEDCOM RS401RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V4.XRUGGEDCOM i802NCRUGGEDCOM i803NCRUGGEDCOM M2100RUGGEDCOM RSG2300FRUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS900NCRUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RMC30NCRUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2200FRUGGEDCOM M2100NCRUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-33382
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 May, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 17:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue in Open5GS v.2.7.0 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the 64 unsuccessful UE/gnb registration

Action-Not Available
Vendor-open5gsn/aopen5gs
Product-open5gsn/aopen5gs
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-33498
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.53% / 66.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 May, 2024 | 10:03
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 02:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA00) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA10) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA20) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA30) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA10) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA20) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA30) (All versions < V3.0.1.1). Affected applications do not properly release memory that is allocated when handling specifically crafted incoming packets. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service condition by crashing the service when it runs out of memory. The service is restarted automatically after a short time.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-SIMATIC RTLS Locating Managersimatic_rtls_locating_manager
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-31152
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.74% / 81.74%
||
7 Day CHG+0.50%
Published-30 Oct, 2024 | 13:35
Updated-13 Nov, 2024 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The LevelOne WBR-6012 router with firmware R0.40e6 is vulnerable to improper resource allocation within its web application, where a series of crafted HTTP requests can cause a reboot. This could lead to network service interruptions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-level1LevelOnelevelone
Product-wbr-6012_firmwarewbr-6012WBR-6012wbr-6012
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-31399
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 47.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2024 | 05:34
Updated-20 Mar, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Excessive platform resource consumption within a loop issue exists in Cybozu Garoon 5.0.0 to 5.15.2. If this vulnerability is exploited, processing a crafted mail may cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cybozu, Inc.
Product-garoonCybozu Garoon
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-25615
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 15.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Mar, 2024 | 20:19
Updated-27 Mar, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An unauthenticated Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the Spectrum service accessed via the PAPI protocol in ArubaOS 8.x. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to interrupt the normal operation of the affected service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)Aruba Networks
Product-ArubaOS Wi-Fi Controllers and Campus/Remote Access Pointsarubaossd-wan
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-25617
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-2.43% / 84.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Feb, 2024 | 20:55
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Denial of Service in HTTP Header parser in squid proxy

Squid is an open source caching proxy for the Web supporting HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more. Due to a Collapse of Data into Unsafe Value bug ,Squid may be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack against HTTP header parsing. This problem allows a remote client or a remote server to perform Denial of Service when sending oversized headers in HTTP messages. In versions of Squid prior to 6.5 this can be achieved if the request_header_max_size or reply_header_max_size settings are unchanged from the default. In Squid version 6.5 and later, the default setting of these parameters is safe. Squid will emit a critical warning in cache.log if the administrator is setting these parameters to unsafe values. Squid will not at this time prevent these settings from being changed to unsafe values. Users are advised to upgrade to version 6.5. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. This issue is also tracked as SQUID-2024:2

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NetApp, Inc.Squid Cache
Product-bluexpsquidsquidsquid
CWE ID-CWE-182
Collapse of Data into Unsafe Value
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-23323
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 1.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Feb, 2024 | 22:50
Updated-01 Aug, 2024 | 22:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Excessive CPU usage when URI template matcher is configured using regex in Envoy

Envoy is a high-performance edge/middle/service proxy. The regex expression is compiled for every request and can result in high CPU usage and increased request latency when multiple routes are configured with such matchers. This issue has been addressed in released 1.29.1, 1.28.1, 1.27.3, and 1.26.7. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyenvoyproxy
Product-envoyenvoy
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-1176
Inefficient CPU Computation
CVE-2024-21914
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Rockwell Automation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Rockwell Automation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 20.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Mar, 2024 | 21:27
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 17:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Rockwell Automation - FactoryTalk® View ME on PanelView™ Plus 7 Boot Terminal lack Security Protections

A vulnerability exists in the affected product that allows a malicious user to restart the Rockwell Automation PanelView™ Plus 7 terminal remotely without security protections. If the vulnerability is exploited, it could lead to the loss of view or control of the PanelView™ product.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Product-FactoryTalk® View MEfactorytalk_view_me
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-20526
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.39% / 59.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Oct, 2024 | 17:53
Updated-31 Oct, 2024 | 01:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the SSH server of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition for the SSH server of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to a logic error when an SSH session is established. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted SSH messages to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust available SSH resources on the affected device so that new SSH connections to the device are denied, resulting in a DoS condition. Existing SSH connections to the device would continue to function normally. The device must be rebooted manually to recover. However, user traffic would not be impacted and could be managed using a remote application such as Cisco Adaptive Security Device Manager (ASDM).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-adaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Softwareadaptive_security_appliance_software
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2024-20344
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.31% / 53.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Feb, 2024 | 16:16
Updated-13 Aug, 2025 | 17:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in system resource management in Cisco UCS 6400 and 6500 Series Fabric Interconnects that are in Intersight Managed Mode (IMM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on the Device Console UI of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient rate-limiting of TCP connections to an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a high number of TCP packets to the Device Console UI. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to cause the Device Console UI process to crash, resulting in a DoS condition. A manual reload of the fabric interconnect is needed to restore complete functionality.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-imm_management_packageucs_6454ucs_64108ucs_6536Cisco Unified Computing System (Managed)ucs_6454ucs_6536
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-38809
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 47.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2024 | 16:39
Updated-27 Sep, 2024 | 20:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Applications that parse ETags from "If-Match" or "If-None-Match" request headers are vulnerable to DoS attack. Users of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Users of older, unsupported versions could enforce a size limit on "If-Match" and "If-None-Match" headers, e.g. through a Filter.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-N/AVMware (Broadcom Inc.)
Product-Spring Frameworkspring_framework
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2022-3818
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 20.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-01 May, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An uncontrolled resource consumption issue when parsing URLs in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions prior to 15.3.5, 15.4 prior to 15.4.4, and 15.5 prior to 15.5.2 allows an attacker to cause performance issues and potentially a denial of service on the GitLab instance.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabGitLab
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2024-54677
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-7.33% / 91.31%
||
7 Day CHG+1.25%
Published-17 Dec, 2024 | 12:35
Updated-08 Aug, 2025 | 12:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Tomcat: DoS in examples web application

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in the examples web application provided with Apache Tomcat leads to denial of service. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.1, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.33, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.9.97. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: 8.5.0 though 8.5.100. Other, older, EOL versions may also be affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.2, 10.1.34 or 9.0.98, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NetApp, Inc.The Apache Software Foundation
Product-bootstrap_ostomcathci_compute_nodeApache Tomcat
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2022-36083
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 25.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Sep, 2022 | 21:55
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
JOSE vulnerable to resource exhaustion via specifically crafted JWE

JOSE is "JSON Web Almost Everything" - JWA, JWS, JWE, JWT, JWK, JWKS with no dependencies using runtime's native crypto in Node.js, Browser, Cloudflare Workers, Electron, and Deno. The PBKDF2-based JWE key management algorithms expect a JOSE Header Parameter named `p2c` PBES2 Count, which determines how many PBKDF2 iterations must be executed in order to derive a CEK wrapping key. The purpose of this parameter is to intentionally slow down the key derivation function in order to make password brute-force and dictionary attacks more expensive. This makes the PBES2 algorithms unsuitable for situations where the JWE is coming from an untrusted source: an adversary can intentionally pick an extremely high PBES2 Count value, that will initiate a CPU-bound computation that may take an unreasonable amount of time to finish. Under certain conditions, it is possible to have the user's environment consume unreasonable amount of CPU time. The impact is limited only to users utilizing the JWE decryption APIs with symmetric secrets to decrypt JWEs from untrusted parties who do not limit the accepted JWE Key Management Algorithms (`alg` Header Parameter) using the `keyManagementAlgorithms` (or `algorithms` in v1.x) decryption option or through other means. The `v1.28.2`, `v2.0.6`, `v3.20.4`, and `v4.9.2` releases limit the maximum PBKDF2 iteration count to `10000` by default. It is possible to adjust this limit with a newly introduced `maxPBES2Count` decryption option. If users are unable to upgrade their required library version, they have two options depending on whether they expect to receive JWEs using any of the three PBKDF2-based JWE key management algorithms. They can use the `keyManagementAlgorithms` decryption option to disable accepting PBKDF2 altogether, or they can inspect the JOSE Header prior to using the decryption API and limit the PBKDF2 iteration count (`p2c` Header Parameter).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jose_projectpanva
Product-josejose
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-834
Excessive Iteration
CVE-2024-46891
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-6.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 40.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2024 | 12:49
Updated-20 Aug, 2025 | 19:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 3). The affected application does not properly restrict the size of generated log files. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger a large amount of logged events to exhaust the system's resources and create a denial of service condition.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sinec_insSINEC INSsinec_ins
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2021-29471
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.61% / 68.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 May, 2021 | 15:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Denial of service in Matrix Synapse

Synapse is a Matrix reference homeserver written in python (pypi package matrix-synapse). Matrix is an ecosystem for open federated Instant Messaging and VoIP. In Synapse before version 1.33.2 "Push rules" can specify conditions under which they will match, including `event_match`, which matches event content against a pattern including wildcards. Certain patterns can cause very poor performance in the matching engine, leading to a denial-of-service when processing moderate length events. The issue is patched in version 1.33.2. A potential workaround might be to prevent users from making custom push rules, by blocking such requests at a reverse-proxy.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Matrix.org FoundationFedora Project
Product-fedorasynapsesynapse
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-331
Insufficient Entropy
CVE-2021-28510
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Arista Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Arista Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 45.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-01 Apr, 2025 | 18:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
For certain systems running EOS, a Precision Time Protocol (PTP) packet of a management/signaling message with an invalid Type-Length-Value (TLV) causes the PTP agent to restart. Repeated restarts of the service will make the service unavailable.

For certain systems running EOS, a Precision Time Protocol (PTP) packet of a management/signaling message with an invalid Type-Length-Value (TLV) causes the PTP agent to restart. Repeated restarts of the service will make the service unavailable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Arista Networks, Inc.
Product-7060sx2-48yc67050qx-32s7304x37150s-647500r27260qx7500r3-36cq7300x-64t7800r3k-48cq7060cx-32s7328x7500r37300x-64s7250qx-647050sx3-48yc7050sx3-48yc87060dx4-32720xp-24y67280sr3k-48yc87300x3-32c7260cx7150s-247320x-32c7512r3720xp-24zy47260cx37170-64c7804r37050sx-72q7280e7050cx3-32s7050sx2-72qeos7150sc-247050sx2-1287260cx3-647504r37020r7150s-527300x3-48yc47050sx-647170-32c720xp-48zc2720xp-96zc27050sx3-48yc12720xp-48y67500r3-24d7500r3-24p7800r3-48cq7300x-32q7500r7170-32cd7050cx3m-32s7368x47050sx-1287050tx-647050tx3-48c87050tx-72q7060px4-327280r37150sc-647280r7060cx2-32s7050tx-487050qx2-32s7500r3k-36cq7508r37500e7800r3-36p7808r37050tx2-1287308x37050sx3-96yc87280r27324x7050sx3-48c87280sr3-48yc8EOS
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-1284
Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found