The SupportCandy WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CSRF check in the wpsc_tickets AJAX action, nor has any sanitisation or escaping in some of the filter fields which could allow attackers to make a logged in user having access to the ticket lists dashboard set an arbitrary filter (stored in their cookies) with an XSS payload in it.

The URL Shortify WordPress plugin before 1.5.1 does not have CSRF check in place when bulk-deleting links or groups, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary link and group via a CSRF attack.

The Shantz WordPress QOTD WordPress plugin through 1.2.2 is lacking any CSRF check when updating its settings, allowing attackers to make logged in administrators change them to arbitrary values.

The Fileviewer WordPress plugin through 2.2 does not have CSRF checks in place when performing actions such as upload and delete files. As a result, attackers could make a logged in administrator delete and upload arbitrary files via a CSRF attack

The Business Directory Plugin – Easy Listing Directories for WordPress WordPress plugin before 5.11.1 suffered from Cross-Site Request Forgery issues, allowing an attacker to make a logged in administrator add, edit or delete form fields, which could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues.

The WP Survey Plus WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks in place in its AJAX actions, allowing any user to call them and add/edit/delete Surveys. Furthermore, due to the lack of sanitization in the Surveys' Title, this could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues

In the Orange Form WordPress plugin through 1.0, the process_bulk_action() function in "admin/orange-form-email.php" performs an unprepared SQL query with an unsanitized parameter ($id). Only admin can access the page that invokes the function, but because of lack of CSRF protection, it is actually exploitable and could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary posts for example

Due to the lack of sanitization and lack of nonce protection on the custom CSS feature, an attacker could craft a request to inject malicious JavaScript on a site using the Contact Form 7 Style WordPress plugin through 3.1.9. If an attacker successfully tricked a site’s administrator into clicking a link or attachment, then the request could be sent and the CSS settings would be successfully updated to include malicious JavaScript.

The Old Posts Highlighter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the OPH_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's configuration settings without authorization via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The wpDiscuz WordPress plugin before 7.3.4 does check for CSRF when adding, editing and deleting comments, which could allow attacker to make logged in users such as admin edit and delete arbitrary comment, or the user who made the comment to edit it via a CSRF attack. Attackers could also make logged in users post arbitrary comment.

The Accept Donations with PayPal WordPress plugin before 1.3.1 provides a function to create donation buttons which are internally stored as posts. The deletion of a button is not CSRF protected and there is no control to check if the deleted post was a button post. As a result, an attacker could make logged in admins delete arbitrary posts

The BP Better Messages WordPress plugin before 1.9.9.41 does not check for CSRF in multiple of its AJAX actions: bp_better_messages_leave_chat, bp_better_messages_join_chat, bp_messages_leave_thread, bp_messages_mute_thread, bp_messages_unmute_thread, bp_better_messages_add_user_to_thread, bp_better_messages_exclude_user_from_thread. This could allow attackers to make logged in users do unwanted actions

The del_reistered_domains AJAX action of the Software License Manager WordPress plugin before 4.5.1 does not have any CSRF checks, and is vulnerable to a CSRF attack

Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/event/duplicate. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.

The Core Tweaks WP Setup WordPress plugin through 4.1 allows to bulk-set many settings in WordPress, including the admin email, as well as creating a new admin account. There is no CSRF protection in place, allowing an attacker to arbitrary change the admin email or create another admin account and takeover the website via CSRF attacks

The Scripts Organizer WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have capability and CSRF checks in the saveScript AJAX action, available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users, and does not validate user input in any way, which could allow unauthenticated users to put arbitrary PHP code in a file

The cms-fuer-motorrad-werkstaetten plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on all eight AJAX deletion handlers: vehicles_cfmw_d_vehicle, contacts_cfmw_d_contact, suppliers_cfmw_d_supplier, receipts_cfmw_d_receipt, positions_cfmw_d_position, catalogs_cfmw_d_article, stock_cfmw_d_item, and settings_cfmw_d_catalog. None of these handlers call check_ajax_referer() or wp_verify_nonce(), nor do they perform any capability checks via current_user_can(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary vehicles, contacts, suppliers, receipts, positions, catalog articles, stock items, or entire supplier catalogs via a forged request, provided they can trick a logged-in user into performing an action such as clicking a link to a malicious page.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in manidoraisamy FormFacade formfacade allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects FormFacade: from n/a through <= 1.4.1.

The QR Redirector WordPress plugin before 1.6 does not have capability and CSRF checks when saving bulk QR Redirector settings via the qr_save_bulk AJAX action, which could allow any authenticated user, such as subscriber to change the redirect response status code of arbitrary QR Redirects

The GoodMeet – Google Meet Integration for Webinar, Meeting & Video Conference plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.1.8. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the reset_credential() function, which handles the wp_ajax_goodmeet_reset_google_meet_credential AJAX action. While the function does verify the user's capability (manage_options), it does not validate a nonce, making it susceptible to CSRF attacks. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into clicking a malicious link that will reset (delete) the plugin's stored Google Meet API credentials (goodmeet_google_credentials) and OAuth tokens (goodmeet_google_token), effectively disabling the Google Meet integration on the site.

The Accept Donations with PayPal WordPress plugin before 1.3.1 offers a function to create donation buttons, which internally are posts. The process to create a new button is lacking a CSRF check. An attacker could use this to make an authenticated admin create a new button. Furthermore, one of the Button field is not escaped before being output in an attribute when editing a Button, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue as well.

The fitness calculators WordPress plugin before 1.9.6 add calculators for Water intake, BMI calculator, protein Intake, and Body Fat and was lacking CSRF check, allowing attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions, such as change the calculator headers. Due to the lack of sanitisation, this could also lead to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue

The DW Question & Answer Pro WordPress plugin through 1.3.4 does not properly check for CSRF in some of its functions, allowing attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions, such as update a comment or a question status.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in apasionados DoFollow Case by Case dofollow-case-by-case allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects DoFollow Case by Case: from n/a through <= 3.5.1.

The wp_ajax_save_fbe_settings and wp_ajax_delete_fbe_settings AJAX actions of the Facebook for WordPress plugin before 3.0.4 were vulnerable to CSRF due to a lack of nonce protection. The settings in the saveFbeSettings function had no sanitization allowing for script tags to be saved.

The Per page add to head WordPress plugin before 1.4.4 is lacking any CSRF check when saving its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them. Furthermore, as the plugin allows arbitrary HTML to be inserted in one of the setting (feature mentioned by the plugin), this could lead to Stored XSS issue which will be triggered either in the backend, frontend or both depending on the payload used.

The St-Daily-Tip WordPress plugin through 4.7 does not have any CSRF check in place when saving its 'Default Text to Display if no tips' setting, and was also lacking sanitisation as well as escaping before outputting it the page. This could allow attacker to make logged in administrators set a malicious payload in it, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue

The WP SEO Redirect 301 WordPress plugin before 2.3.2 does not have CSRF in place when deleting redirects, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack

djangoSIGE through 1.10 (commit a6fe7e8) contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to cancel sales or purchase orders on behalf of authenticated users by exploiting order-cancellation logic implemented inside HTTP GET method handlers in CancelarOrcamentoVendaView, CancelarPedidoVendaView, CancelarOrcamentoCompraView, and CancelarPedidoCompraView. Attackers can lure an authenticated victim with change_orcamentovenda or equivalent permissions to a page containing a cross-origin reference such as an img tag pointing to the cancellation endpoint, bypassing CSRF token validation entirely since Django's CsrfViewMiddleware only enforces CSRF checks on unsafe HTTP methods.

A security vulnerability has been detected in code-projects Invoice System in Laravel 1.0. This affects an unknown function. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.4, 10.12.x <= 10.12.2, 10.11.x <= 10.11.6 and Mattermost Calls versions <=1.10.0 fail to implement CSRF protection on the Calls widget page which allows an authenticated attacker to initiate calls and inject messages into channels or direct messages via a malicious webpage or crafted link

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MERGADO Mergado Pack mergado-marketing-pack allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Mergado Pack: from n/a through <= 4.2.1.

A CVE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists that could allow an attacker to impersonate the user or carry out actions on their behalf when crafted malicious parameters are submitted in POST requests sent to the charging station web server. Affected Products: EVlink City EVC1S22P4 / EVC1S7P4 (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2 ), EVlink Parking EVW2 / EVF2 / EVP2PE (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2), and EVlink Smart Wallbox EVB1A (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dmitry V. (CEO of "UKR Solution") UPC/EAN/GTIN Code Generator upc-ean-barcode-generator allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects UPC/EAN/GTIN Code Generator: from n/a through <= 2.0.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PluginOps Feather Login Page feather-login-page allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Feather Login Page: from n/a through <= 1.1.7.

BIG-IP version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.3, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.2, 13.1.x before 13.1.4.1, and all versions of 12.1.x and 11.6.x and all versions of BIG-IQ 8.x, 7.x, and 6.x are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks through iControl SOAP. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpmediadownload Media Library File Download media-download allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Media Library File Download: from n/a through <= 1.4.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect QuLog Center. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to gain privileges or hijack user identities. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QuLog Center 1.8.2.927 ( 2025/09/17 ) and later

The package joplin before 2.3.2 are vulnerable to Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) due to missing CSRF checks in various forms.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Concrete CMS <v9 that could allow an attacker to make requests on behalf of other users.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alexander Fuchs PHP Everywhere plugin <= 2.0.2 versions.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Liferay Portal 7.4.1 through 7.4.3.112, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows remote attackers to add and edit publication comments.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in inkthemes WP Gmail SMTP wp-gmail-smtp allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Gmail SMTP: from n/a through <= 1.0.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Omid Shamloo Pardakht Delkhah pardakht-delkhah allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Pardakht Delkhah: from n/a through <= 3.0.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Eugen Bobrowski Robots.txt rewrite robotstxt-rewrite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Robots.txt rewrite: from n/a through <= 1.6.1.

Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/backend/file rescanMultiple(). The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TangibleWP Vehica Core vehica-core allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Vehica Core: from n/a through <= 1.0.100.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in grooni Groovy Menu groovy-menu-free allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Groovy Menu: from n/a through <= 1.4.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in javothemes Javo Core javo-core allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects Javo Core: from n/a through <= 3.0.0.266.

Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/express/association/reorder. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.