A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in MipCMS v5.0.1 allows attackers to arbitrarily escalate user privileges to administrator via index.php?s=/user/ApiAdminUser/itemEdit.

The plus/search.php component in DedeCMS 5.7 SP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the typename parameter because the contents of typename.inc are under an attacker's control.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Vulnerability in ForestBlog latest version via the website Management background, which could let a remote malicious gain privileges.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Intelliants Subrion CMS v4.2.1 via the Members administrator function, which could let a remote unauthenticated malicious user send an authorised request to victim and successfully create an arbitrary administrator user.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in IgnitedCMS v1.0 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information and gain privilege via the component "/admin/profile/save_profile".

Cross Site Request Forgey (CSRF) in iWebShop v5.3 allows remote atatckers to execute arbitrary code via malicious POST request to the component '/index.php?controller=system&action=admin_edit_act'.

The Field Test gem 0.2.0 through 0.3.2 for Ruby allows CSRF.

Missing checks on Content-Type headers in geckodriver before 0.27.0 could lead to a CSRF vulnerability, that might, when paired with a specifically prepared request, lead to remote code execution.

ad-ldap-connector's admin panel before version 5.0.13 does not provide csrf protection, which when exploited may result in remote code execution or confidential data loss. CSRF exploits may occur if the user visits a malicious page containing CSRF payload on the same machine that has access to the ad-ldap-connector admin console via a browser. You may be affected if you use the admin console included with ad-ldap-connector versions <=5.0.12. If you do not have ad-ldap-connector admin console enabled or do not visit any other public URL while on the machine it is installed on, you are not affected. The issue is fixed in version 5.0.13.

Hoosk Codeigniter CMS before 1.7.2 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). When an attacker induces authenticated admin user to a malicious web page, any accounts can be deleted without admin user's intention.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Tran Table of Contents Plus allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Table of Contents Plus: from n/a through 2408.

In MISP before 2.4.129, setting a favourite homepage was not CSRF protected.

The Himer WordPress theme before 2.1.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks. These include declining and accepting group invitations or leaving a group

The WooCommerce Report plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options that can be leveraged for privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Philips Clinical Collaboration Platform, Versions 12.2.1 and prior. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties required to process the data safely and correctly.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in LXD-UI in Canonical LXD versions >= 5.0 on Linux allows an attacker to create and start container instances without user consent via crafted HTML form submissions exploiting client certificate authentication.

QuickCMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in page deletion functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the admin, will automatically send a POST request deleting an article. The vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version 6.8 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested and might also be vulnerable.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in motov.net Ebook Store allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Ebook Store: from n/a through 5.8013.

pramodmahato BlogCMS through 2019-12-31 has admin/changepass.php CSRF.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Toast Plugins Animator allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Animator: from n/a through 3.0.16.

The SecuPress Free — WordPress Security plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.5.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the secupress_blackhole_ban_ip() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to block a user's IP via a forged request granted they can trick the user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Blend Media WordPress CTA allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WordPress CTA: from n/a through 1.6.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress Thim Core allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Thim Core: from n/a through 2.3.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ApusTheme Findgo allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Findgo: from n/a through 1.3.57.

An issue was discovered in the Real-Time Find and Replace plugin before 4.0.2 for WordPress. The far_options_page function did not do any nonce verification, allowing for requests to be forged on behalf of an administrator. The find and replace rules could be updated with malicious JavaScript, allowing for that be executed later in the victims browser.

An issue was discovered in the Image Resizer plugin before 2.0.9 for Craft CMS. There are CSRF issues with the log-clear controller action.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in rui_mashita Aioseo Multibyte Descriptions allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Aioseo Multibyte Descriptions: from n/a through 0.0.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rameez Iqbal Real Estate Manager allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects Real Estate Manager: from n/a through 7.3.

The Yuki theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including 1.3.14. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the reset_customizer_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the themes settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

** PRODUCT NOT SUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A Cross Side Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was found in Codiad v1.7.8 and later. The request to download a plugin from the marketplace is only available to admin users and it isn't CSRF protected in components/market/controller.php. This might cause admins to make a vulnerable request without them knowing and result in remote code execution. NOTE: the vendor states "Codiad is no longer under active maintenance by core contributors."

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shahjahan Jewel WP GDPR Cookie Consent wp-gdpr-cookie-consent allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP GDPR Cookie Consent: from n/a through <= 1.0.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tony Zeoli Radio Station allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Radio Station: from n/a through 2.5.12.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in opicron Image Cleanup allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Image Cleanup: from n/a through 1.9.2.

D-Link DIR-865L Ax 1.20B01 Beta devices allow CSRF.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of RAD SecFlow-1v os-image SF_0290_2.3.01.26 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. This could be exploited in conjunction with CVE-2020-13260.

An issue was discovered on V-Zug Combi-Steam MSLQ devices before Ethernet R07 and before WLAN R05. There is no CSRF protection established on the web service.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Burst Statistics B.V. Burst Statistics allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Burst Statistics: from n/a through 2.0.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in imw3 My Wp Brand allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects My Wp Brand: from n/a through 1.1.3.

The Ecwid by Lightspeed Ecommerce Shopping Cart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.12.27. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ecwid_deactivate_feedback() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send deactivation messages on behalf of a site owner via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

An issue was discovered in the SiteOrigin Page Builder plugin before 2.10.16 for WordPress. The action_builder_content function did not do any nonce verification, allowing for requests to be forged on behalf of an administrator. The panels_data $_POST variable allows for malicious JavaScript to be executed in the victim's browser.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in activewebsight SEO Backlink Monitor allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects SEO Backlink Monitor: from n/a through 1.6.0.

The Envo's Elementor Templates & Widgets for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.4.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_plugin_activation function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to activate arbitrary installed plugins via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The XV Random Quotes WordPress plugin through 1.40 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin reset them via a CSRF attack

clearsystem.php in NukeViet 4.4 allows CSRF with resultant HTML injection via the deltype parameter to the admin/index.php?nv=webtools&op=clearsystem URI.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Slickstream Slickstream allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Slickstream: from n/a through 2.0.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Konrád Koller ONet Regenerate Thumbnails allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects ONet Regenerate Thumbnails: from n/a through 1.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Infigo Software IS-theme-companion allows Object Injection. This issue affects IS-theme-companion: from n/a through 1.57.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in the GACL functionality of OpenEMR 5.0.2 and development version 6.0.0 (commit babec93f600ff1394f91ccd512bcad85832eb6ce). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to the execution of arbitrary requests in the context of the victim. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

An issue was discovered in the SiteOrigin Page Builder plugin before 2.10.16 for WordPress. The live editor feature did not do any nonce verification, allowing for requests to be forged on behalf of an administrator. The live_editor_panels_data $_POST variable allows for malicious JavaScript to be executed in the victim's browser.

The Mautic Integration for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.0.3 does not have proper CSRF check when updating settings, and does not ensure that the options to be updated belong to the plugin, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin change arbitrary blog options via a CSRF attack.