In SurfaceFlinger, there is a possible use-after-free due to improper locking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the graphics server with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11Android ID: A-150225569
In verifyIntentFiltersIfNeeded of PackageManagerService.java, there is a possible settings bypass allowing an app to become the default handler for arbitrary domains. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-146204120
In keyguardGoingAway of ActivityTaskManagerService.java, there is a possible lock screen bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
In binder_transaction of binder.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android kernelAndroid ID: A-136210786References: Upstream kernel
In checkKeyIntentParceledCorrectly of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible way to launch arbitrary activities using system privileges due to Parcel Mismatch. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with P(9.0) software. There is a heap overflow in the knox_kap driver. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14857 (November 2019).
In telephony, there is a possible bypass of user interaction requirements due to missing permission checks. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10Android ID: A-73136824
In startActivityMayWait of ActivityStarter.java, there is a possible incorrect Activity launch due to an incorrect permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-7.1.1 Android-7.1.2 Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9Android ID: A-123013720
In the APEX module framework of AOSP, there is a possible malicious update to platform components due to improperly used crypto. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. More details on this can be found in the referenced links.
In call of SliceProvider.java, there is a possible permissions bypass due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-138441555
In WelcomeActivity.java and related files, there is a possible permissions bypass due to a partially provisioned Device Policy Client. This could lead to local escalation of privilege, leaving an Admin app installed with no indication to the user, with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-132261064
In CreateAudioBroadcast of broadcaster.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with N(7.x), O(8.x), and P(9.0) software. There is local SQL injection in the RCS Content Provider. The Samsung IDs are SVE-2019-14059, SVE-2019-14685 (August 2019).
In load_logging_config of qmi_vs_service.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-139148442
In SurfaceFlinger::createLayer of SurfaceFlinger.cpp, there is a possible arbitrary code execution due to improper casting. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-9Android ID: A-137284057
In tokenize of sqlite3_android.cpp, there is a possible attacker controlled INSERT statement due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-139186193
In generatePackageInfo of PackageManagerService.java, there is a possible permissions bypass due to an incorrect permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege that allows instant apps access to permissions not allowed for instant apps, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10 Android-11 Android-8.0Android ID: A-140256621
In CryptoPlugin::decrypt of CryptoPlugin.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-137370777
In binder_alloc_free_page of binder_alloc.c, there is a possible double free due to improper locking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Product: Android. Versions: Android kernel. Android ID: A-120025196.
On Samsung mobile devices with O(8.0) and P(9.0) software and an Exynos 8895 chipset, RKP (aka the Samsung Hypervisor EL2 implementation) allows arbitrary memory write operations. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-16265.
In telecom service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In sendDeviceState_1_6 of RadioExt.cpp, there is a possible use after free due to improper locking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
In telecom service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In openAssetFileListener of ContactsProvider2.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege to change contact data with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11Android ID: A-150857116
In camera service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In power manager, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In engineermode service, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In telecom service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In telecom service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In telocom service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In telecom service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In telecom service, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In linkturbo, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
In phasechecksercer, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed
A use after free vulnerability in iva_ctl driver prior to SMR Sep-2022 Release 1 allows attacker to cause memory access fault.
In android_view_InputDevice_create of android_view_InputDevice.cpp, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
In getCredentialManagerPolicy of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible method for users to select credential managers without permission due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to corrupt memory due to a double free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
In temp_residency_name_store of thermal_metrics.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
In TBD of TBD, there is a possible way to bypass carrier restrictions due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.