EyouCMS V1.5.9-UTF8-SP1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Basic Information component under the Edit Member module.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Paramveer Singh for Arete IT Private Limited Activity Reactions For Buddypress plugin <= 1.0.22 versions.

A vulnerability was found in CoreHR Core Portal up to 27.0.7. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 27.0.8 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

Gila CMS before 1.11.6 allows CSRF with resultant XSS via the admin/themes URI, leading to compromise of the admin account.

KYOCERA Net Admin 3.4.0906 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that automatically submit forms to add new admin accounts with predefined credentials when a logged-in user visits the page.

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects D3600 before 1.0.0.72, D6000 before 1.0.0.72, EX3700 before 1.0.0.70, EX3800 before 1.0.0.70, EX6000 before 1.0.0.30, EX6100 before 1.0.2.24, EX6120 before 1.0.0.40, EX6130 before 1.0.0.22, EX6150v1 before 1.0.0.42, EX6200 before 1.0.3.88, EX7000 before 1.0.0.66, and WN2500RPv2 before 1.0.1.54.

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities in All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall (WordPress plugin) <= 5.1.0 on WordPress.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 5.12.0, 5.11.1, 5.10.2, 5.9.2, and 4.10.10. The login page allows CSRF.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tribulant Newsletters plugin <= 4.8.8 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Forms by CaptainForm – Form Builder for WordPress plugin <= 2.5.3 versions.

EyouCMS V1.5.9-UTF8-SP1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Top Up Balance component under the Edit Member module.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in dzzoffice 2.02.1_SC_UTF8 allows attackers to arbitrarily create user accounts and grant Administrator rights to regular users.

IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 191391.

The Perfect Survey WordPress plugin before 1.5.2 does not have proper authorisation nor CSRF checks in the save_global_setting AJAX action, allowing unauthenticated users to edit surveys and modify settings. Given the lack of sanitisation and escaping in the settings, this could also lead to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue which will be executed in the context of a user viewing any survey

An issue was discovered in Serpico (aka SimplE RePort wrIting and CollaboratiOn tool) 1.3.0. It does not use CSRF Tokens to mitigate against CSRF; it uses the Origin header (which must match the request origin). This is problematic in conjunction with XSS: one can escalate privileges from User level to Administrator.

A flaw in the WordPress plugin, WP Maintenance before 5.0.6, allowed attackers to enable a vulnerable site's maintenance mode and inject malicious code affecting site visitors. There was CSRF with resultant XSS.

CandidATS version 3.0.0 allows an external attacker to elevate privileges in the application. This is possible because the application suffers from CSRF. This allows to persuade an administrator to create a new account with administrative permissions.

DedeCMS v6.1.9 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily add Administrator accounts and modify Admin passwords.

A CSRF issue was discovered on Intelbras IWR 3000N 1.8.7 devices, leading to complete control of the router, as demonstrated by v1/system/user.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco HyperFlex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Whydonate Whydonate – FREE Donate button – Crowdfunding – Fundraising plugin <= 3.12.15 versions.

The Scripts Organizer WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have capability and CSRF checks in the saveScript AJAX action, available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users, and does not validate user input in any way, which could allow unauthenticated users to put arbitrary PHP code in a file

RoxyFileman, as shipped with nopCommerce v4.2.0, is vulnerable to CSRF because GET requests can be used for renames and deletions.

An issue was discovered on NETGEAR WNR1000V4 1.1.0.54 devices. Multiple actions within the WNR1000V4 web management console are vulnerable to an unauthenticated GET request (exploitable directly or through CSRF), as demonstrated by the setup.cgi?todo=save_htp_account URI.

In MIELE XGW 3000 ZigBee Gateway before 2.4.0, a malicious website visited by an authenticated admin user or a malicious mail is allowed to make arbitrary changes in the "admin panel" because there is no CSRF protection.

In Zmanda Management Console 3.3.9, ZMC_Admin_Advanced?form=adminTasks&action=Apply&command= allows CSRF, as demonstrated by command injection with shell metacharacters. This may depend on weak default credentials.

The St-Daily-Tip WordPress plugin through 4.7 does not have any CSRF check in place when saving its 'Default Text to Display if no tips' setting, and was also lacking sanitisation as well as escaping before outputting it the page. This could allow attacker to make logged in administrators set a malicious payload in it, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue

Xerox AltaLink C8035 printers allow CSRF. A request to add users is made in the Device User Database form field to the xerox.set URI. (The frmUserName value must have a unique name.)

MFScripts YetiShare 3.5.2 through 4.5.3 does not set the SameSite flag on session cookies, allowing the cookie to be sent in cross-site requests and potentially be used in cross-site request forgery attacks.

HCL Compass is vulnerable to Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS). This vulnerability can allow an unprivileged remote attacker to trick a legitimate user into accessing a special resource and executing a malicious request.

A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Web File Manager's Edit Accounts functionality of Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. By exploiting it, an attacker can take over a user account by changing the password, update users' details, and escalate privileges via RAPR/DefineUsersSet.html.

Intelbras RF1200 1.1.3 devices allow CSRF to bypass the login.html form, as demonstrated by launching a scrapy process.

payment_manage.ajax.php and various *_manage.ajax.php in MFScripts YetiShare 3.5.2 through 4.5.4 directly insert values from the sSortDir_0 parameter into a SQL string. This allows an attacker to inject their own SQL and manipulate the query, typically extracting data from the database, aka SQL Injection. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-19732.

The wpForo plugin 1.6.5 for WordPress allows wp-admin/admin.php?page=wpforo-usergroups CSRF.

A CSRF issue was discovered in DAViCal through 1.1.8. If an authenticated user visits an attacker-controlled webpage, the attacker can send arbitrary requests in the name of the user to the application. If the attacked user is an administrator, the attacker could for example add a new admin user.

In the Reponsive Menu (free and Pro) WordPress plugins before 4.0.4, attackers could craft a request and trick an administrator into uploading a zip archive containing malicious PHP files. The attacker could then access those files to achieve remote code execution and further infect the targeted site.

The Radio Buttons for Taxonomies plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_single_term() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save terms via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability has been identified in XHQ (All Versions < 6.1). The web interface could allow a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack if an unsuspecting user is tricked into accessing a malicious link.

An issue was discovered in Joomla! before 3.9.13. A missing token check in com_template causes a CSRF vulnerability.

index.php/team_members/add_team_member in RISE Ultimate Project Manager 2.3 has CSRF for adding authorized users.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Your_account module in CMSphp 0.21 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change an administrator password via the pseudo, pwd, and uid parameters in an admin_info_user_verif action.

Sitemagic CMS 4.4.1 is affected by a Cross-Site-Request-Forgery (CSRF) issue as it doesn't implement any method to validate incoming requests, allowing the execution of critical functionalities via spoofed requests. This behavior could be abused by a remote unauthenticated attacker to trick Sitemagic users into performing unwarranted actions.

For Eclipse Che versions 6.16 to 7.3.0, with both authentication and TLS disabled, visiting a malicious web site could trigger the start of an arbitrary Che workspace. Che with no authentication and no TLS is not usually deployed on a public network but is often used for local installations (e.g. on personal laptops). In that case, even if the Che API is not exposed externally, some javascript running in the local browser is able to send requests to it.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the user, including modifying the device configuration. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading an interface user to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the user. Software versions prior to 8.3.150.0, 8.5.135.0, and 8.8.100.0 are affected.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the user interface of Fortinet FortiSIEM 5.2.5 could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to perform arbitrary actions using an authenticated user's session by persuading the victim to follow a malicious link.

Zoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus 5.x through 5803 has CSRF on the users' profile information page. Users who are attacked with this vulnerability will be forced to modify their enrolled information, such as email and mobile phone, unintentionally. Attackers could use the reset password function and control the system to send the authentication code back to the channel that the attackers own.

app/system/admin/admin/index.class.php in MetInfo 7.0.0beta allows a CSRF attack to add a user account via a doSaveSetup action to admin/index.php, as demonstrated by an admin/?n=admin&c=index&a=doSaveSetup URI.

OSIsoft PI Vision, All versions of PI Vision prior to 2019. The affected product is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery that may be introduced on the PI Vision administration site.

A vulnerability in the web-based UI (web UI) of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. If the user has administrative privileges, the attacker could alter the configuration, execute commands, or reload an affected device. This vulnerability affects Cisco devices that are running a vulnerable release of Cisco IOS XE Software with the HTTP Server feature enabled. The default state of the HTTP Server feature is version dependent.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON versions prior to 1.2 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a user and to perform unintended operations by having a user view a malicious page.