The "Follow Me Plugin" plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the FollowMeIgniteSocialMedia_options_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Maxum Rumpus 8.2.13 and 8.2.14 is affected by cross-site request forgery (CSRF). If an authenticated user visits a malicious page, unintended actions could be performed in the web application as the authenticated user.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.4.3.

Unisys Data Exchange Management Studio before 6.0.IC2 and 7.x before 7.0.IC1 doesn't have an Anti-CSRF token to authenticate the POST request. Thus, a cross-site request forgery attack could occur.

Cloudera Data Engineering (CDE) before 1.1 was vulnerable to a CSRF attack.

forma.lms 2.3.0.2 is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in formalms/appCore/index.php?r=lms/profile/show&ap=saveinfo via a GET request to change the admin email address in order to accomplish an account takeover.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pankaj Jha WordPress Ping Optimizer plugin <= 2.35.1.2.3 versions.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins SSH Plugin 2.6.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified SSH server using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in dangrossman W3Counter Free Real-Time Web Stats blog-stats-by-w3counter allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects W3Counter Free Real-Time Web Stats: from n/a through <= 4.1.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Storable Configs Plugin 1.0 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins parse a local XML file (e.g., archived artifacts) that uses external entities for extraction of secrets from the Jenkins controller or server-side request forgery.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Private Only plugin 3.5.1 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add users, (2) delete posts, or (3) modify PHP files via unspecified vectors, or (4) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the po_logo parameter in the privateonly.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.

IBM DataPower Gateway V10CD, 10.0.1, and 2018.4.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 228357.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SOGo before 3.1.0.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Autocomplete Parameter Plugin 1.1 and earlier allows attackers to execute arbitrary code without sandbox protection if the victim is an administrator.

A CSRF issue was discovered in Intland codeBeamer ALM 10.x through 10.1.SP4. Requests sent to the server that trigger actions do not contain a CSRF token and can therefore be entirely predicted allowing attackers to cause the victim's browser to execute undesired actions in the web application through crafted requests.

Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security Virtual Appliance (IMSVA) 9.1 is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability which could allow an attacker to modify policy rules by tricking an authenticated administrator into accessing an attacker-controlled web page. An attacker must already have obtained product administrator/root privileges to exploit this vulnerability.

An issue was discovered in MCMS 5.2.7. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can add an administrator account via ms/basic/manager/save.do.

"IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a "user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 227295.

Enabling and disabling installed H5P libraries did not include the necessary token to prevent a CSRF risk.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mod/user/act_user.php in Garfield Petshop through 2020-10-01 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative accounts.

A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the loginsystem page in PHPGurukul User Registration & Login and User Management System With Admin Panel 2.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BOINC Server allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects BOINC Server: before 1.4.3.

The Crypto plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.15. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'crypto_connect_ajax_process::check' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as any existing user on the site, such as an administrator via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A CSRF vulnerability in the UPnP MediaServer implementation in Freebox Server before 4.2.3.

Mahara before 20.10.5, 21.04.4, 21.10.2, and 22.04.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) because randomly generated tokens are too easily guessable.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in springframework-social before 1.1.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wow-Company Modal Window modal-window allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Modal Window: from n/a through <= 6.1.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in MiKa's OSM – OpenStreetMap plugin <= 6.0.1 versions.

Lumidek Associates Simple Food Website 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows anyone to takeover admin/moderater account.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in WWBN AVideo 11.6 and dev master commit 3f7c0364. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to increased privileges. An attacker can get an authenticated user to send a crafted HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

geminabox (aka Gem in a Box) before 0.13.7 has CSRF, as demonstrated by an unintended gem upload.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0). The web interface of the affected devices are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. By tricking an authenticated victim user to click a malicious link, an attacker could perform arbitrary actions on the device on behalf of the victim user.

LexisNexis Firco Compliance Link 3.7 allows CSRF.

D-Link DIR-655 C devices before 3.02B05 BETA03 allow CSRF for the entire management console.

The Innovs HR WordPress plugin through 1.0.3.4 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks such as adding them as employees.

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Admin Management Xtended plugin <= 2.4.4 at WordPress.

The Plack::Middleware::XSRFBlock package before 0.0.19 for Perl allows attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via an empty form value and an empty cookie (if signed cookies are disabled).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Advanced Flamingo.This issue affects Advanced Flamingo: from n/a through 1.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aftab Muni's Disable Right Click For WP plugin <= 1.1.6 at WordPress.

The 0mk Shortener plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the zeromk_options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via the 'zeromk_user' and 'zeromk_apikluc' parameters through a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Image Slider by NextCode plugin <= 1.1.2 at WordPress.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Publish Over FTP Plugin 1.16 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an FTP server using attacker-specified credentials.

An exploitable cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in the web server functionality of Moxa EDR-810 V4.1 build 17030317. A specially crafted HTTP packet can cause cross-site request forgery. An attacker can create malicious HTML to trigger this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) leading to Arbitrary File Upload vulnerability in Rara One Click Demo Import plugin <= 1.2.9 on WordPress allows attackers to trick logged-in admin users into uploading dangerous files into /wp-content/uploads/ directory.

The Business Directory Plugin – Easy Listing Directories for WordPress WordPress plugin before 5.11.1 suffered from Cross-Site Request Forgery issues, allowing an attacker to make a logged in administrator add, edit or delete form fields, which could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Online Banquet Booking System v1.0 allows attackers to change admin credentials via a crafted POST request.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in XXL-Job v2.3.0 allows attackers to arbitrarily create administrator accounts via the component /gaia-job-admin/user/add.

Easy!Appointments is a self hosted appointment scheduler. In 1.5.2 and earlier, application/core/EA_Security.php::csrf_verify() only enforces CSRF for POST requests and returns early for non-POST methods. Several application endpoints perform state-changing operations while accepting parameters from GET (or $_REQUEST), so an attacker can perform CSRF by forcing a victim's browser to issue a crafted GET request. Impact: creation of admin accounts, modification of admin email/password, and full admin account takeover.

The Digits plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 8.4.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'digits_save_settings' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the default role of registered users to elevate user privileges via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Appointment Booking Calendar WordPress plugin before 1.3.83 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks such as adding a booking to the calendar without paying.