Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2026-25673

Summary
Assigner-DSF
Assigner Org ID-6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92
Published At-03 Mar, 2026 | 14:28
Updated At-03 Mar, 2026 | 15:26
Rejected At-
Credits

Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in URLField via Unicode normalization on Windows

An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.3, 5.2 before 5.2.12, and 4.2 before 4.2.29. `URLField.to_python()` in Django calls `urllib.parse.urlsplit()`, which performs NFKC normalization on Windows that is disproportionately slow for certain Unicode characters, allowing a remote attacker to cause denial of service via large URL inputs containing these characters. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Seokchan Yoon for reporting this issue.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
â–¼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:DSF
Assigner Org ID:6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92
Published At:03 Mar, 2026 | 14:28
Updated At:03 Mar, 2026 | 15:26
Rejected At:
â–¼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in URLField via Unicode normalization on Windows

An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.3, 5.2 before 5.2.12, and 4.2 before 4.2.29. `URLField.to_python()` in Django calls `urllib.parse.urlsplit()`, which performs NFKC normalization on Windows that is disproportionately slow for certain Unicode characters, allowing a remote attacker to cause denial of service via large URL inputs containing these characters. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Seokchan Yoon for reporting this issue.

Affected Products
Vendor
Djangodjangoproject
Product
Django
Collection URL
https://pypi.org/project/Django/
Package Name
django
Repo
https://github.com/django/django/
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 6.0 before 6.0.3 (semver)
  • From 5.2 before 5.2.12 (semver)
  • From 4.2 before 4.2.29 (semver)
Unaffected
  • 6.0.3 (semver)
  • 5.2.12 (semver)
  • 4.2.29 (semver)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-400CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-400
Description: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Django severity rating
value:
moderate
namespace:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/security/#security-issue-severity-levels
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
CAPEC-227CAPEC-227: Sustained Client Engagement
CAPEC ID: CAPEC-227
Description: CAPEC-227: Sustained Client Engagement
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

reporter
Seokchan Yoon
remediation developer
Natalia Bidart
coordinator
Natalia Bidart
Timeline
EventDate
Initial report received.2026-01-27 12:00:00
Vulnerability confirmed.2026-02-20 12:00:00
Security release issued.2026-03-03 08:00:00
Event: Initial report received.
Date: 2026-01-27 12:00:00
Event: Vulnerability confirmed.
Date: 2026-02-20 12:00:00
Event: Security release issued.
Date: 2026-03-03 08:00:00
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/
vendor-advisory
https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce
mailing-list
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/mar/03/security-releases/
vendor-advisory
Hyperlink: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/
Resource:
vendor-advisory
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce
Resource:
mailing-list
Hyperlink: https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/mar/03/security-releases/
Resource:
vendor-advisory
â–¼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
â–¼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92
Published At:03 Mar, 2026 | 15:16
Updated At:03 Mar, 2026 | 21:52

An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.3, 5.2 before 5.2.12, and 4.2 before 4.2.29. `URLField.to_python()` in Django calls `urllib.parse.urlsplit()`, which performs NFKC normalization on Windows that is disproportionately slow for certain Unicode characters, allowing a remote attacker to cause denial of service via large URL inputs containing these characters. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Seokchan Yoon for reporting this issue.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CPE Matches

Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-400Secondary6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92
CWE ID: CWE-400
Type: Secondary
Source: 6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92
N/A
https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92
N/A
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/mar/03/security-releases/6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92
N/A
Hyperlink: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/
Source: 6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce
Source: 6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/mar/03/security-releases/
Source: 6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

1147Records found

CVE-2023-27530
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.86% / 82.85%
||
7 Day CHG-0.20%
Published-10 Mar, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 15:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A DoS vulnerability exists in Rack <v3.0.4.2, <v2.2.6.3, <v2.1.4.3 and <v2.0.9.3 within in the Multipart MIME parsing code in which could allow an attacker to craft requests that can be abuse to cause multipart parsing to take longer than expected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rackn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-rackdebian_linuxhttps://github.com/rack/rack
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2025-21251
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.31% / 79.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jan, 2025 | 18:03
Updated-13 Feb, 2026 | 19:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_1607windows_10_1809windows_server_2008windows_11_24h2windows_11_22h2windows_server_2012windows_server_2016windows_server_2022windows_server_2022_23h2windows_10_21h2windows_10_1507windows_server_2019windows_10_22h2windows_server_2025windows_11_23h2Windows Server 2025Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2022Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2016Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2012 R2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2023-26597
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Honeywell International Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Honeywell International Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 16.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jul, 2023 | 11:04
Updated-05 Mar, 2025 | 18:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Controller DOS on sending error response

Controller DoS due to buffer overflow in the handling of a specially crafted message received by the controller. See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning. See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Honeywell International Inc.
Product-c300_firmwarec300C300
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-787
Out-of-bounds Write
CVE-2025-21351
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-22.08% / 95.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Feb, 2025 | 17:58
Updated-13 Feb, 2026 | 19:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Active Directory Domain Services API Denial of Service Vulnerability

Windows Active Directory Domain Services API Denial of Service Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-Windows Server 2025Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2022Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2016Windows 11 version 22H2Windows 10 Version 21H2
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2025-21290
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.31% / 79.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jan, 2025 | 18:03
Updated-13 Feb, 2026 | 19:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_1607windows_10_1809windows_server_2008windows_11_24h2windows_11_22h2windows_server_2012windows_server_2016windows_server_2022windows_server_2022_23h2windows_10_21h2windows_10_1507windows_server_2019windows_10_22h2windows_server_2025windows_11_23h2Windows Server 2025Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2022Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2016Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2012 R2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2025-21181
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-27.13% / 96.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Feb, 2025 | 17:58
Updated-13 Feb, 2026 | 19:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2019windows_11_23h2windows_10_1809windows_11_22h2windows_server_2025windows_server_2022windows_11_24h2windows_server_2012windows_server_2016windows_server_2022_23h2windows_10_1507windows_10_21h2windows_10_22h2windows_10_1607windows_server_2008Windows Server 2025Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2022Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2016Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2012 R2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2025-21300
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.31% / 79.66%
||
7 Day CHG+0.32%
Published-14 Jan, 2025 | 18:04
Updated-13 Feb, 2026 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) Device Host Denial of Service Vulnerability

Windows Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) Device Host Denial of Service Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_21h2windows_server_2016windows_10_1507windows_10_22h2windows_server_2012windows_server_2008windows_11_24h2windows_11_23h2windows_10_1809windows_server_2022windows_server_2025windows_11_22h2windows_server_2022_23h2windows_10_1607windows_server_2019Windows Server 2025Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2022Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2016Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2012 R2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2025-21289
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.31% / 79.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jan, 2025 | 18:03
Updated-13 Feb, 2026 | 19:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_1607windows_10_1809windows_server_2008windows_11_24h2windows_11_22h2windows_server_2012windows_server_2016windows_server_2022windows_server_2022_23h2windows_10_21h2windows_10_1507windows_server_2019windows_10_22h2windows_server_2025windows_11_23h2Windows Server 2025Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2022Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2016Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2012 R2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2025-21207
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.83% / 74.36%
||
7 Day CHG+0.29%
Published-14 Jan, 2025 | 18:04
Updated-13 Feb, 2026 | 19:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Connected Devices Platform Service (Cdpsvc) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Windows Connected Devices Platform Service (Cdpsvc) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_22h2windows_11_23h2windows_server_2019windows_server_2022windows_10_1809windows_11_24h2windows_server_2025windows_11_22h2windows_10_21h2windows_server_2022_23h2Windows Server 2025Windows Server 2022Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows 11 version 22H2Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H3Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2019
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2023-27191
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 28.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Apr, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-11 Feb, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue found in DUALSPACE Super Secuirty v.2.3.7 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the SharedPreference files.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-dualspacen/a
Product-super_securityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-27314
Matching Score-4
Assigner-NetApp, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-NetApp, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.60% / 69.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2023 | 18:26
Updated-18 Sep, 2024 | 15:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Denial of Service Vulnerability in ONTAP 9

ONTAP 9 versions prior to 9.8P19, 9.9.1P16, 9.10.1P12, 9.11.1P8, 9.12.1P2 and 9.13.1 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a crash of the HTTP service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NetApp, Inc.
Product-clustered_data_ontapONTAP 9
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2023-26601
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-4.94% / 89.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Mar, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-06 Mar, 2025 | 15:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus through 14104, Asset Explorer through 6987, ServiceDesk Plus MSP before 14000, and Support Center Plus before 14000 allow Denial-of-Service (DoS).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aZoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
Product-manageengine_servicedesk_plusmanageengine_supportcenter_plusmanageengine_servicedesk_plus_mspmanageengine_assetexplorern/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2025-21230
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.31% / 79.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jan, 2025 | 18:04
Updated-13 Feb, 2026 | 19:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016windows_10_1507windows_10_22h2windows_10_1607windows_11_23h2windows_server_2019windows_server_2022windows_10_1809windows_11_24h2windows_server_2025windows_11_22h2windows_server_2012windows_10_21h2windows_server_2008windows_server_2022_23h2Windows Server 2025Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2022Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2016Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2012 R2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2023-25568
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.58% / 68.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 May, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 16:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Boxo bitswap/server: DOS unbounded persistent memory leak

Boxo, formerly known as go-libipfs, is a library for building IPFS applications and implementations. In versions 0.4.0 and 0.5.0, if an attacker is able allocate arbitrary many bytes in the Bitswap server, those allocations are lasting even if the connection is closed. This affects users accepting untrusted connections with the Bitswap server and also affects users using the old API stubs at `github.com/ipfs/go-libipfs/bitswap` because users then transitively import `github.com/ipfs/go-libipfs/bitswap/server`. Boxo versions 0.6.0 and 0.4.1 contain a patch for this issue. As a workaround, those who are using the stub object at `github.com/ipfs/go-libipfs/bitswap` not taking advantage of the features provided by the server can refactor their code to use the new split API that will allow them to run in a client only mode: `github.com/ipfs/go-libipfs/bitswap/client`.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-protocolipfs
Product-boxoboxo
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-26151
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 35.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Oct, 2023 | 05:00
Updated-20 Sep, 2024 | 14:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Versions of the package asyncua before 0.9.96 are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) such that an attacker can send a malformed packet and as a result, the server will enter into an infinite loop and consume excessive memory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-freeopcuan/a
Product-opcua-asyncioasyncua
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-835
Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
CVE-2023-25774
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.07% / 21.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2023 | 15:27
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 11:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the vpnserver ConnectionAccept() functionality of SoftEther VPN 5.02. A set of specially crafted network connections can lead to denial of service. An attacker can send a sequence of malicious packets to trigger this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-softetherSoftEther VPNsoftether
Product-vpnSoftEther VPNvpn
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2025-21174
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-35.91% / 97.02%
||
7 Day CHG-1.99%
Published-08 Apr, 2025 | 17:23
Updated-13 Feb, 2026 | 19:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Standards-Based Storage Management Service Denial of Service Vulnerability

Uncontrolled resource consumption in Windows Standards-Based Storage Management Service allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2012windows_server_2022windows_server_2019windows_server_2025windows_server_2016Windows Server 2025Windows Server 2022Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2016Windows Server 2012 R2Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2025-21270
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.31% / 79.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jan, 2025 | 18:03
Updated-13 Feb, 2026 | 19:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016windows_10_1507windows_10_22h2windows_10_1607windows_11_23h2windows_server_2019windows_server_2022windows_10_1809windows_11_24h2windows_server_2025windows_11_22h2windows_server_2012windows_10_21h2windows_server_2008windows_server_2022_23h2Windows Server 2025Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2022Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2016Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2012 R2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2Windows Server 2012Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2023-26141
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.45% / 63.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Sep, 2023 | 05:00
Updated-25 Sep, 2024 | 19:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Versions of the package sidekiq before 7.1.3 are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) due to insufficient checks in the dashboard-charts.js file. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the localStorage value which will cause excessive polling requests.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-contribsysn/acontribsys
Product-sidekiqsidekiqsidekiq
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2019-19343
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.51% / 66.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Mar, 2021 | 20:23
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in Undertow when using Remoting as shipped in Red Hat Jboss EAP before version 7.2.4. A memory leak in HttpOpenListener due to holding remote connections indefinitely may lead to denial of service. Versions before undertow 2.0.25.SP1 and jboss-remoting 5.0.14.SP1 are believed to be vulnerable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.NetApp, Inc.
Product-jboss_enterprise_application_platformundertowactive_iq_unified_managerjboss-remotingUndertow
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-404
Improper Resource Shutdown or Release
CVE-2019-1967
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-2.57% / 85.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Aug, 2019 | 21:45
Updated-19 Nov, 2024 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco NX-OS Software Network Time Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Network Time Protocol (NTP) feature of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to excessive use of system resources when the affected device is logging a drop action for received MODE_PRIVATE (Mode 7) NTP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by flooding the device with a steady stream of Mode 7 NTP packets. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause high CPU and memory usage on the affected device, which could cause internal system processes to restart or cause the affected device to unexpectedly reload. Note: The NTP feature is enabled by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-nexus_93180lc-exnexus_56128pnexus_9332pqnexus_3172tqnexus_93108tc-exnx-osnexus_3636c-rnexus_9508nexus_93120txnexus_93128txnexus_9336pq_aci_spinenexus_6004mds_9140nexus_3548-xlnexus_31128pqnexus_3132q-vnexus_9332cnexus_7000_9-slotnexus_9364cnexus_92348gc-xnexus_3172tq-32tnexus_9336c-fx2nexus_3164qmds_9200nexus_3524-xnexus_3132c-znexus_31108tc-vnexus_5548pnexus_9348gc-fxpnexus_5648qnexus_3172mds_9000nexus_9272qnexus_3464cmds_9700nexus_93216tc-fx2nexus_36180yc-rnexus_5672upnexus_93180yc-fxnexus_3264qnexus_3432d-snexus_34180ycnexus_9000vnexus_31108pc-vnexus_7700_18-slotnexus_5596upnexus_3524nexus_3548mds_9500nexus_7000_4-slotnexus_7700_6-slotnexus_3132qnexus_3016nexus_9372pxnexus_5696qnexus_92304qcnexus_92160yc-xnexus_7700_10-slotmds_9100nexus_9504nexus_3048nexus_9372tx-enexus_6001nexus_93108tc-fxnexus_93360yc-fx2nexus_3524-xlnexus_9396txnexus_7000_10-slotnexus_7000nexus_92300ycnexus_3064nexus_3232cnexus_5548upnexus_9396pxnexus_5596tnexus_3264c-enexus_7700_2-slotnexus_93240yc-fx2nexus_9372txnexus_5624qnexus_3548-xnexus_3132q-xlnexus_3064-tnexus_3172tq-xlnexus_93180yc-exnexus_3408-snexus_9372px-enexus_7000_18-slotnexus_9236cnexus_9516nexus_3172pq-xlnexus_7700Cisco NX-OS Software
CWE ID-CWE-399
Not Available
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-18904
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SUSE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SUSE
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.93% / 75.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2020 | 07:10
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Migrations requests can cause DoS on rmt

A Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in rmt of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15-ESPOS, SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15-LTSS, SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15-SP1, SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15, SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15-SP1, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-LTSS, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15; openSUSE Leap 15.1 allows remote attackers to cause DoS against rmt by requesting migrations. This issue affects: SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15-ESPOS rmt-server versions prior to 2.5.2-3.26.1. SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15-LTSS rmt-server versions prior to 2.5.2-3.26.1. SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15-SP1 rmt-server versions prior to 2.5.2-3.9.1. SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 rmt-server versions prior to 2.5.2-3.26.1. SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15-SP1 rmt-server versions prior to 2.5.2-3.9.1. SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-LTSS rmt-server versions prior to 2.5.2-3.26.1. SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15 rmt-server versions prior to 2.5.2-3.26.1. openSUSE Leap 15.1 rmt-server versions prior to 2.5.2-lp151.2.9.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openSUSESUSE
Product-linux_enterprise_serverlinux_enterprise_high_performance_computingrmt-serverlinux_enterpriseleapSUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15-LTSSSUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15-ESPOSSUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15-SP1SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15-SP1openSUSE Leap 15.1SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15-LTSSSUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP 15
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-17592
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.58% / 68.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Oct, 2019 | 19:59
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The csv-parse module before 4.4.6 for Node.js is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service. The __isInt() function contains a malformed regular expression that processes large crafted input very slowly. This is triggered when using the cast option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-csv-parse_projectn/aFedora Project
Product-csv-parsefedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-19301
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.54% / 67.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Apr, 2020 | 19:50
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X200-4P IRT, SCALANCE X201-3P IRT, SCALANCE X201-3P IRT PRO, SCALANCE X202-2IRT, SCALANCE X202-2P IRT, SCALANCE X202-2P IRT PRO, SCALANCE X204-2, SCALANCE X204-2FM, SCALANCE X204-2LD, SCALANCE X204-2LD TS, SCALANCE X204-2TS, SCALANCE X204IRT, SCALANCE X204IRT PRO, SCALANCE X206-1, SCALANCE X206-1LD, SCALANCE X208, SCALANCE X208PRO, SCALANCE X212-2, SCALANCE X212-2LD, SCALANCE X216, SCALANCE X224, SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X304-2FE, SCALANCE X306-1LD FE, SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X320-1 FE, SCALANCE X320-1-2LD FE, SCALANCE X408-2, SCALANCE XF201-3P IRT, SCALANCE XF202-2P IRT, SCALANCE XF204, SCALANCE XF204-2, SCALANCE XF204-2BA IRT, SCALANCE XF204IRT, SCALANCE XF206-1, SCALANCE XF208, SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front), SIMATIC CP 343-1 Advanced, SIMATIC CP 442-1 RNA, SIMATIC CP 443-1, SIMATIC CP 443-1, SIMATIC CP 443-1 Advanced, SIMATIC CP 443-1 RNA, SIMATIC RF180C, SIMATIC RF182C, SIPLUS NET CP 343-1 Advanced, SIPLUS NET CP 443-1, SIPLUS NET CP 443-1 Advanced, SIPLUS NET SCALANCE X308-2. The VxWorks-based Profinet TCP Stack can be forced to make very expensive calls for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-simatic_rf182csimatic_rf182c_firmwarescalance_xp-200_firmwarescalance_x-200irt_pro_firmwaresimatic_cp_443-1_advanced_firmwarescalance_xc-200_firmwaresimatic_cp_443-1_firmwarescalance_xb-200scalance_xr-300wg_firmwarescalance_xr-300wgscalance_xp-200simatic_rf180cscalance_x-200irt_firmwarescalance_xr-300scalance_x-300scalance_x-200irtscalance_x-200irt_prosimatic_cp_443-1scalance_xb-200_firmwarescalance_xf-200_firmwarescalance_xf-200scalance_xr-300_firmwarescalance_x-300_firmwaresimatic_rf180c_firmwarescalance_xc-200simatic_cp_443-1_advancedSCALANCE XF208SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V)SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front)SCALANCE X204IRTSCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear)SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated)SCALANCE XF204-2BA IRTSCALANCE X204-2FMSCALANCE X204-2TSSCALANCE X307-3SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear)SCALANCE X308-2SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front)SCALANCE X204-2LD TSSCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated)SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated)SIMATIC CP 443-1 AdvancedSIMATIC RF180CSCALANCE X224SIPLUS NET SCALANCE X308-2SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front)SCALANCE X202-2P IRTSCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear)SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V)SIMATIC CP 443-1SCALANCE X206-1LDSCALANCE X308-2LDSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V)SIMATIC CP 343-1 AdvancedSCALANCE X208SCALANCE X304-2FESCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V)SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear)SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V)SCALANCE XF204IRTSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V)SCALANCE X208PROSCALANCE X212-2LDSCALANCE X204IRT PROSCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V)SCALANCE X204-2SCALANCE XF206-1SIMATIC RF182CSCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear)SIPLUS NET CP 443-1SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear)SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear)SCALANCE X204-2LDSCALANCE X201-3P IRTSCALANCE X308-2MSCALANCE X308-2M PoESCALANCE X310FESCALANCE X308-2LH+SCALANCE X206-1SCALANCE XF204SIPLUS NET CP 343-1 AdvancedSCALANCE X307-3LDSCALANCE X202-2IRTSCALANCE X308-2LHSCALANCE XF204-2SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear)SIMATIC CP 442-1 RNASCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front)SIPLUS NET CP 443-1 AdvancedSCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V)SCALANCE X408-2SCALANCE XF201-3P IRTSCALANCE XF202-2P IRTSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated)SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated)SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated)SCALANCE X202-2P IRT PROSCALANCE X310SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V)SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front)SCALANCE X212-2SCALANCE X320-1 FESCALANCE X306-1LD FESIMATIC CP 443-1 RNASCALANCE X308-2M TSSCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front)SCALANCE X216SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated)SCALANCE X201-3P IRT PROSCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated)SCALANCE X200-4P IRTSCALANCE X320-1-2LD FESCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front)SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front)SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front)
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-18336
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 48.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Mar, 2020 | 19:16
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-300 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC TDC CP51M1 (All versions < V1.1.8), SIMATIC TDC CPU555 (All versions < V1.1.1), SINUMERIK 840D sl (All versions < V4.8.6), SINUMERIK 840D sl (All versions < V4.94). Specially crafted packets sent to port 102/tcp (Profinet) could cause the affected device to go into defect mode. A restart is required in order to recover the system. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to have network access to port 102/tcp, with no authentication. No user interation is required. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-simatic_s7-300_cpu_313simatic_tdc_cpu555_firmwaresimatic_tdc_cp51m1_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_316-2_dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_314simatic_tdc_cp51m1simatic_s7-300_cpu_314_ifmsimatic_tdc_cpu555simatic_s7-300_cpu_312_ifmsimatic_s7-300_cpu_318-2_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_313_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_314_ifm_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_316-2_dpsimatic_s7-300_cpu_318-2simatic_s7-300_cpu_315-2_dpsimatic_s7-300_cpu_315_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_315-2_dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_315simatic_s7-300_cpu_312_ifm_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpusimatic_s7-300_cpu_314_firmwaresinumerik_840d_slSIMATIC S7-300 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC TDC CPU555SIMATIC TDC CP51M1SINUMERIK 840D sl
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2023-26485
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 30.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Mar, 2023 | 22:01
Updated-11 Feb, 2025 | 17:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Quadratic complexity may lead to a denial of service in cmark-gfm

cmark-gfm is GitHub's fork of cmark, a CommonMark parsing and rendering library and program in C. A polynomial time complexity issue in cmark-gfm may lead to unbounded resource exhaustion and subsequent denial of service. This CVE covers quadratic complexity issues when parsing text which leads with either large numbers of `_` characters. This issue has been addressed in version 0.29.0.gfm.10. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should validate that their input comes from trusted sources. ### Impact A polynomial time complexity issue in cmark-gfm may lead to unbounded resource exhaustion and subsequent denial of service. ### Proof of concept ``` $ ~/cmark-gfm$ python3 -c 'pad = "_" * 100000; print(pad + "." + pad, end="")' | time ./build/src/cmark-gfm --to plaintext ``` Increasing the number 10000 in the above commands causes the running time to increase quadratically. ### Patches This vulnerability have been patched in 0.29.0.gfm.10. ### Note on cmark and cmark-gfm XXX: TBD [cmark-gfm](https://github.com/github/cmark-gfm) is a fork of [cmark](https://github.com/commonmark/cmark) that adds the GitHub Flavored Markdown extensions. The two codebases have diverged over time, but share a common core. These bugs affect both `cmark` and `cmark-gfm`. ### Credit We would like to thank @gravypod for reporting this vulnerability. ### References https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_complexity ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in [github/cmark-gfm](https://github.com/github/cmark-gfm)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GitHub, Inc.
Product-cmark-gfmcmark-gfm
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-407
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity
CVE-2022-2529
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cloudflare, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cloudflare, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 54.51%
||
7 Day CHG-0.38%
Published-30 Sep, 2022 | 10:45
Updated-20 May, 2025 | 16:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Multiple DoS Attack Vectors in sflow packet handling

sflow decode package does not employ sufficient packet sanitisation which can lead to a denial of service attack. Attackers can craft malformed packets causing the process to consume large amounts of memory resulting in a denial of service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cloudflare, Inc.
Product-goflowgoflow
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-1644
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.28% / 79.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2019 | 23:00
Updated-19 Nov, 2024 | 19:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco IoT Field Network Director Resource Exhaustion Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the UDP protocol implementation for Cisco IoT Field Network Director (IoT-FND) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to exhaust system resources, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to improper resource management for UDP ingress packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a high rate of UDP packets to an affected system within a short period of time. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust available system resources, resulting in a DoS condition.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-iot_field_network_directorCisco IoT Field Network Director (IoT-FND)
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2022-23486
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 54.51%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Dec, 2022 | 20:03
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 16:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
libp2p-rust denial of service vulnerability from lack of resource management

libp2p-rust is the official rust language Implementation of the libp2p networking stack. In versions prior to 0.45.1 an attacker node can cause a victim node to allocate a large number of small memory chunks, which can ultimately lead to the victim’s process running out of memory and thus getting killed by its operating system. When executed continuously, this can lead to a denial of service attack, especially relevant on a larger scale when run against more than one node of a libp2p based network. Users are advised to upgrade to `libp2p` `v0.45.1` or above. Users unable to upgrade should reference the DoS Mitigation page for more information on how to incorporate mitigation strategies, monitor their application, and respond to attacks: https://docs.libp2p.io/reference/dos-mitigation/.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-protocollibp2p
Product-libp2prust-libp2p
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-26104
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.49% / 65.35%
||
7 Day CHG+0.39%
Published-25 Feb, 2023 | 05:00
Updated-11 Mar, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

All versions of the package lite-web-server are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) when an attacker sends an HTTP request and includes control characters that the decodeURI() function is unable to parse.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lite-web-server_projectn/a
Product-lite-web-serverlite-web-server
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2023-26157
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.04% / 12.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jan, 2024 | 05:00
Updated-14 Nov, 2024 | 19:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Versions of the package libredwg before 0.12.5.6384 are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) due to an out-of-bounds read involving section->num_pages in decode_r2007.c.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGNU
Product-libredwglibredwg
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CVE-2023-26509
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jul, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-27 Nov, 2024 | 17:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

AnyDesk 7.0.8 allows remote Denial of Service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-anydeskn/a
Product-anydeskn/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2023-25151
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.47% / 64.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:21
Updated-10 Mar, 2025 | 21:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
DoS vulnerability for high cardinality metrics in opentelemetry-go-contrib

opentelemetry-go-contrib is a collection of extensions for OpenTelemetry-Go. The v0.38.0 release of `go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp` uses the `httpconv.ServerRequest` function to annotate metric measurements for the `http.server.request_content_length`, `http.server.response_content_length`, and `http.server.duration` instruments. The `ServerRequest` function sets the `http.target` attribute value to be the whole request URI (including the query string)[^1]. The metric instruments do not "forget" previous measurement attributes when `cumulative` temporality is used, this means the cardinality of the measurements allocated is directly correlated with the unique URIs handled. If the query string is constantly random, this will result in a constant increase in memory allocation that can be used in a denial-of-service attack. This issue has been addressed in version 0.39.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-open-telemetryThe Linux Foundation
Product-opentelemetry-go_contribopentelemetry-go-contrib
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-17360
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.71% / 72.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2019 | 17:39
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in Hitachi Command Suite 7.x and 8.x before 8.7.0-00 allows an unauthenticated remote user to trigger a denial of service (DoS) condition because of Uncontrolled Resource Consumption.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOracle CorporationLinux Kernel Organization, IncHitachi, Ltd.Microsoft Corporation
Product-solarislinux_kernelinfrastructure_analytics_advisorwindowstuning_managerreplication_managerdevice_managertiered_storage_managern/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2022-24713
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-7.01% / 91.36%
||
7 Day CHG+1.16%
Published-08 Mar, 2022 | 19:00
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Regular expression denial of service in Rust's regex crate

regex is an implementation of regular expressions for the Rust language. The regex crate features built-in mitigations to prevent denial of service attacks caused by untrusted regexes, or untrusted input matched by trusted regexes. Those (tunable) mitigations already provide sane defaults to prevent attacks. This guarantee is documented and it's considered part of the crate's API. Unfortunately a bug was discovered in the mitigations designed to prevent untrusted regexes to take an arbitrary amount of time during parsing, and it's possible to craft regexes that bypass such mitigations. This makes it possible to perform denial of service attacks by sending specially crafted regexes to services accepting user-controlled, untrusted regexes. All versions of the regex crate before or equal to 1.5.4 are affected by this issue. The fix is include starting from regex 1.5.5. All users accepting user-controlled regexes are recommended to upgrade immediately to the latest version of the regex crate. Unfortunately there is no fixed set of problematic regexes, as there are practically infinite regexes that could be crafted to exploit this vulnerability. Because of this, it us not recommend to deny known problematic regexes.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rust-langrust-langFedora ProjectDebian GNU/Linux
Product-regexdebian_linuxfedoraregex
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-1333
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
CVE-2022-24294
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-4.72% / 89.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Jul, 2022 | 17:45
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 04:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ReDoS in Apache MXNet RTC Module

A regular expression used in Apache MXNet (incubating) is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service by excessive resource consumption. The bug could be exploited when loading a model in Apache MXNet that has a specially crafted operator name that would cause the regular expression evaluation to use excessive resources to attempt a match. This issue affects Apache MXNet versions prior to 1.9.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-mxnetApache MXNet
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-15538
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-16.43% / 94.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Aug, 2019 | 15:25
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in xfs_setattr_nonsize in fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c in the Linux kernel through 5.2.9. XFS partially wedges when a chgrp fails on account of being out of disk quota. xfs_setattr_nonsize is failing to unlock the ILOCK after the xfs_qm_vop_chown_reserve call fails. This is primarily a local DoS attack vector, but it might result as well in remote DoS if the XFS filesystem is exported for instance via NFS.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aFedora ProjectopenSUSECanonical Ltd.Linux Kernel Organization, IncNetApp, Inc.Debian GNU/Linux
Product-ubuntu_linuxh300eh500sh300s_firmwareh410c_firmwareh410sh610s_firmwareleaph300saff_a700ssolidfireh300e_firmwareh610sdebian_linuxlinux_kernelh500ehci_management_nodeh410s_firmwarefedorah500s_firmwareh500e_firmwareh700s_firmwareh700eh410ch700e_firmwareh700saff_a700s_firmwaredata_availability_servicesn/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-15961
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-2.21% / 84.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jan, 2020 | 19:05
Updated-15 Nov, 2024 | 17:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Clam AntiVirus (ClamAV) Software Email Parsing Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the email parsing module Clam AntiVirus (ClamAV) Software versions 0.102.0, 0.101.4 and prior could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to inefficient MIME parsing routines that result in extremely long scan times of specially formatted email files. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted email file to an affected device. An exploit could allow the attacker to cause the ClamAV scanning process to scan the crafted email file indefinitely, resulting in a denial of service condition.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxClamAVCanonical Ltd.Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ubuntu_linuxemail_security_appliance_firmwareclamavdebian_linuxClamAV
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-15226
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-11.72% / 93.59%
||
7 Day CHG-5.25%
Published-09 Oct, 2019 | 15:25
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Upon receiving each incoming request header data, Envoy will iterate over existing request headers to verify that the total size of the headers stays below a maximum limit. The implementation in versions 1.10.0 through 1.11.1 for HTTP/1.x traffic and all versions of Envoy for HTTP/2 traffic had O(n^2) performance characteristics. A remote attacker may craft a request that stays below the maximum request header size but consists of many thousands of small headers to consume CPU and result in a denial-of-service attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyn/a
Product-envoyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-13946
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.55% / 67.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Feb, 2020 | 15:36
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Profinet-IO (PNIO) stack versions prior V06.00 do not properly limit internal resource allocation when multiple legitimate diagnostic package requests are sent to the DCE-RPC interface. This could lead to a denial of service condition due to lack of memory for devices that include a vulnerable version of the stack. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker with network access to an affected device. Successful exploitation requires no system privileges and no user interaction. An attacker could use the vulnerability to compromise the availability of the device.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-simatic_et200al_im_157-1_pn_firmwaresimatic_rf182cscalance_xr526simatic_et200m_im153-4_pn_io_hf_firmwarescalance_xr552_firmwaresimatic_et200mp_im155-5_pn_st_firmwarescalance_xr552simatic_cp_1616ruggedcom_rm1224_firmwaresimatic_cp_1604simatic_et200sp_im155-6_pn_hfdk_standard_ethernet_controllerscalance_xr-300wgscalance_xp-200simatic_et200mp_im155-5_pn_hf_firmwarescalance_xf-200basimatic_ipc_supportscalance_x-400_firmwarescalance_x-300scalance_x-200irtsimatic_cp_443-1simatic_cp_343-1_erpcscalance_xf-200_firmwarescalance_xf-200simatic_et200sp_im155-6_pn_basicsimatic_et200sp_im155-6_pn_hf_firmwarescalance_s615_firmwaresimatic_cp_1616_firmwarescalance_xr524_firmwarescalance_w700_ieee_802.11n_firmwarescalance_m-800_firmwaresimatic_et200m_im153-4_pn_io_st_firmwaresimatic_cp_443-1_advanced_firmwarescalance_xc-200_firmwareprofinet_driversimatic_cp_343-1simatic_et200al_im_157-1_pnim_154-3_pn_hfsimatic_cp_343-1_lean_firmwaresimatic_mv420_firmwarescalance_xr-300wg_firmwaresimatic_mv420im_154-4_pn_hfsimatic_et200ecopnscalance_x-200irt_firmwaresimatic_et200s_firmwarescalance_xr526_firmwarescalance_x-300_firmwareek-ertec_200scalance_xr524simatic_rf600simatic_cp_443-1_opc_uaek-ertec_200_firmwaresinamics_dcp_firmwaresimatic_cp_443-1_advancedsimatic_mv440simatic_cp_343-1_firmwarescalance_xm-400simatic_et200pro_firmwaresimatic_cp_343-1_leanscalance_xf-200ba_firmwaresimatic_et200ecopn_firmwareek-ertec_200p_firmwarescalance_xr528_firmwarescalance_xr528simatic_rf180csimatic_mv440_firmwareruggedcom_rm1224scalance_x-400simatic_cp_1604_firmwarescalance_s615im_154-4_pn_hf_firmwaresimatic_cp_343-1_advanced_firmwaresimatic_cp_443-1_opc_ua_firmwaresimatic_rf600_firmwarescalance_w700_ieee_802.11nsimatic_pn\/pn_coupler_firmwaresimatic_et200m_im153-4_pn_io_stek-ertec_200psinamics_dcpsimatic_et200ssimatic_rf182c_firmwarescalance_xp-200_firmwaresimatic_et200sp_im155-6_pn_basic_firmwaresimatic_et200mp_im155-5_pn_stsimatic_cp_443-1_firmwarescalance_xb-200simatic_et200sp_im155-6_pn_st_firmwareim_154-3_pn_hf_firmwarescalance_xm-400_firmwaresimatic_cp_343-1_erpc_firmwaresimatic_et200proscalance_xb-200_firmwaresimatic_pn\/pn_couplersimatic_et200sp_im155-6_pn_stsimatic_et200mp_im155-5_pn_hfscalance_xc-200simatic_rf180c_firmwaresimatic_cp_343-1_advancedscalance_m-800simatic_et200m_im153-4_pn_io_hfSCALANCE XF208SIMOTION DSCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front)SCALANCE X204IRTSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated)SIMATIC PN/PN Coupler (incl. SIPLUS NET variants)SIMOTION PSCALANCE XB-200 familySCALANCE X204-2TSSCALANCE X307-3SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear)SCALANCE X308-2SIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HF T1 RAILSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated)SIMATIC RF180CSIMATIC MV440 HRSIPLUS NET SCALANCE X308-2SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front)SIMATIC ET200ecoPN: IO-Link MasterSCALANCE X202-2P IRTSCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear)SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V)SIMATIC CP 443-1SOFTNET-IE PNIOSCALANCE S615 LAN-RouterSCALANCE X206-1LDSIMATIC CP 343-1 AdvancedSIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8 DIO, DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12SIMATIC ET 200M IM 153-4 PN IO HF (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF T1 RAILSCALANCE W-700 IEEE 802.11n familySIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN ST TX RAILSIMATIC MV420 SR-BSCALANCE XR-500 familySINAMICS DCPSIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 16DI, DC24V, 8xM12SCALANCE XF204IRTSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V)SIMATIC ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN STSCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-RouterSCALANCE XF-200BASCALANCE X204IRT PROSIMATIC MV420 SR-PSCALANCE XP-200SIMATIC RF182CSIPLUS NET CP 443-1SIMOTION CSCALANCE X201-3P IRTSCALANCE M804PBSIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/0,5A, 4xM12Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: EK-ERTEC 200PSIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN ST BASIMATIC ET 200pro IM 154-3 PN HFSCALANCE X206-1SCALANCE XF204SIMATIC MV420 SR-B BodyDevelopment/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: EK-ERTEC 200SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12SIMATIC IPC Support, Package for VxWorksSCALANCE X308-2LHSCALANCE XF204-2SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear)SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front)SCALANCE XM-400 familySCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V)SCALANCE X408-2SCALANCE XF201-3P IRTSIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/1,3A, 4xM12SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN ST BA TX RAILSIMATIC MV420 SR-P BodySCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-RouterSIMATIC MV440 SRSCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-RouterSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V)SCALANCE X212-2SCALANCE X306-1LD FESCALANCE X308-2M TSSCALANCE M876-3SIMATIC ET 200AL IM 157-1 PNSIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DI, DC24V, 8xM12SIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN ST TX RAILSCALANCE X201-3P IRT PROSCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated)SCALANCE X320-1-2LD FESCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front)SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V)SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear)SCALANCE XF204-2BA IRTSCALANCE X204-2FMSIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 16DO DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12SIMATIC CP 443-1 OPC UASCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front)SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 4AO U/I 4xM12SCALANCE X204-2LD TSSIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HFSCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated)SIMATIC CP 443-1 AdvancedSCALANCE XR-300WG familySCALANCE X224SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN STSIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HFPROFINET Driver for ControllerSIMATIC RF600R familySCALANCE M876-4 (NAM)SCALANCE M874-3SCALANCE X308-2LDSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V)SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN BASCALANCE X208SCALANCE M876-3 (ROK)SCALANCE X304-2FESCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V)SIPLUS NET CP 343-1 LeanSCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear)SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN ST BASCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V)SIMATIC ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HFRUGGEDCOM RM1224 familySIMATIC ET 200pro IM 154-4 PN HFSCALANCE X208PROSIPLUS NET CP 343-1SCALANCE X212-2LDSCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V)SCALANCE X204-2SCALANCE XF206-1SIMATIC ET200S (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC CP 343-1 LeanSCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear)SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8AI RTD/TC 8xM12SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear)SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear)SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8AI; 4 U/I; 4 RTD/TC 8xM12SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DI, DC24V, 4xM12SCALANCE X204-2LDSCALANCE M876-4 (EU)SIMATIC ET 200M IM 153-4 PN IO ST (incl. SIPLUS variants)SCALANCE X308-2MSCALANCE X308-2M PoESCALANCE X310FESCALANCE X308-2LH+SIPLUS NET CP 343-1 AdvancedSIMATIC CP 343-1SCALANCE X307-3LDDevelopment/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: DK Standard Ethernet ControllerSIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8 DO, DC24V/2A, 8xM12SIPLUS NET CP 443-1 AdvancedSCALANCE XF202-2P IRTSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated)SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated)SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated)SCALANCE X202-2P IRT PROSCALANCE X310SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front)SIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN STSCALANCE X320-1 FESCALANCE M874-2SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front)SIMATIC CP 343-1 ERPCSIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN STSIMATIC MV440 URSCALANCE X216SIMATIC CP 1616 and CP 1604SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated)SIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HFSCALANCE X200-4P IRTSCALANCE XC-200SCALANCE X202-2IRTSCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front)SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front)
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2022-23487
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.34% / 56.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Dec, 2022 | 20:05
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 16:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
libp2p denial of service vulnerability from lack of resource management

js-libp2p is the official javascript Implementation of libp2p networking stack. Versions older than `v0.38.0` of js-libp2p are vulnerable to targeted resource exhaustion attacks. These attacks target libp2p’s connection, stream, peer, and memory management. An attacker can cause the allocation of large amounts of memory, ultimately leading to the process getting killed by the host’s operating system. While a connection manager tasked with keeping the number of connections within manageable limits has been part of js-libp2p, this component was designed to handle the regular churn of peers, not a targeted resource exhaustion attack. Users are advised to update their js-libp2p dependency to `v0.38.0` or greater. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-protocollibp2p
Product-libp2pjs-libp2p
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2019-13940
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.60% / 69.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Feb, 2020 | 15:36
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8 PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8F PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8FX PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V4.1), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315T-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317T-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317TF-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319F-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V6 and below CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V7 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC WinAC RTX 2010 (All versions), SIMATIC WinAC RTX F 2010 (All versions), SIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17). Affected devices contain a vulnerability that could cause a denial of service condition of the web server by sending specially crafted HTTP requests to ports 80/tcp and 443/tcp. Beyond the web service, no other functions or interfaces are affected by the denial of service condition.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-simatic_s7-300_cpu_317-2_pn\/dp_firmwaresimatic_winac_rtx_\(f\)_2010siplus_s7-300_cpu_314siplus_s7-300_cpu_315-2_pn\/dp_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1214fcs7-1200_cpu_1215fc_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_319-3_pn\/dpsimatic_s7-300_cpu_317-2_dpsiplus_s7-300_cpu_315-2_pn\/dpsimatic_s7-300_cpu_315-2dp_firmwaresiplus_s7-300_cpu_317-2_pn\/dpsiplus_cpu_1214c_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1214c_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1212c_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_317-2_dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_315-2_pn\/dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-400_pn\/dp_cpu_firmwaresiplus_cpu_1211csiplus_s7-300_cpu_317-2_pn\/dp_firmwaresiplus_s7-300_cpu_315-2_dp_firmwaresimatic_s7-400_pn\/dp_cpus7-1200_cpu_1215csiplus_cpu_1215c_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1211c_firmwaresiplus_cpu_1212c_firmwaresiplus_cpu_1214csimatic_s7-300_cpu_317-2_pn\/dps7-1200_cpu_1212cs7-1200_cpu_1217c_firmwaresiplus_s7-1200simatic_s7-300_cpu_315-2dpsiplus_s7-300_cpu_315-2_dpsiplus_cpu_1211c_firmwaresimatic_s7-300_cpu_315-2_pn\/dpsiplus_cpu_1215cs7-1200_cpu_1212fc_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1212fcsimatic_s7-300_cpu_319-3_pn\/dp_firmwaresiplus_s7-300_cpu_314_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1215fcs7-1200_cpu_1211cs7-1200_cpu_1215c_firmwares7-1200_cpu_1214csiplus_cpu_1212cs7-1200_cpu_1217cs7-1200_cpu_1214fc_firmwaresiplus_s7-1200_firmwareSIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8F PN/DP CPUSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317T-3 PN/DPSIMATIC WinAC RTX 2010SIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPUSIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPUSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC WinAC RTX F 2010SIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPUSIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V7 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V6 and below CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DPSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317TF-3 PN/DPSIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPUSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DPSIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8 PN/DP CPUSIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8FX PN/DP CPUSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315T-3 PN/DPSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319F-3 PN/DPSIPLUS S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-14888
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 46.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2020 | 16:25
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability was found in the Undertow HTTP server in versions before 2.0.28.SP1 when listening on HTTPS. An attacker can target the HTTPS port to carry out a Denial Of Service (DOS) to make the service unavailable on SSL.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.NetApp, Inc.
Product-jboss_data_gridsingle_sign-onjboss_fuseactive_iq_unified_managerundertowjboss_enterprise_application_platformundertow
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2023-5724
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.83% / 74.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Oct, 2023 | 12:47
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Drivers are not always robust to extremely large draw calls and in some cases this scenario could have led to a crash. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 119, Firefox ESR < 115.4, and Thunderbird < 115.4.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxMozilla Corporation
Product-firefoxthunderbirddebian_linuxfirefox_esrFirefox ESRFirefoxThunderbird
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2009-3791
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.97% / 76.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Dec, 2009 | 16:00
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 15:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Unspecified vulnerability in Adobe Flash Media Server (FMS) before 3.5.3 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via unknown vectors.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aAdobe Inc.
Product-flash_media_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-13003
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.08% / 24.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Mar, 2020 | 14:53
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 12.0.3. One of the parsers used by Gilab CI was vulnerable to a resource exhaustion attack. It allows Uncontrolled Resource Consumption.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabn/a
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-13926
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 54.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Feb, 2020 | 15:36
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE S602 (All versions >= V3.0 and < V4.1), SCALANCE S612 (All versions >= V3.0 and < V4.1), SCALANCE S623 (All versions >= V3.0 and < V4.1), SCALANCE S627-2M (All versions >= V3.0 and < V4.1). Specially crafted packets sent to port 443/tcp of affected devices could cause a Denial-of-Service condition of the web server. A cold reboot is required to restore the functionality of the device.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-scalance_s623scalance_s612_firmwarescalance_s627-2m_firmwarescalance_s602scalance_s627-2mscalance_s602_firmwarescalance_s623_firmwarescalance_s612SCALANCE S627-2MSCALANCE S623SCALANCE S602SCALANCE S612
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-13925
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.38% / 59.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Feb, 2020 | 15:36
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE S602 (All versions >= V3.0 and < V4.1), SCALANCE S612 (All versions >= V3.0 and < V4.1), SCALANCE S623 (All versions >= V3.0 and < V4.1), SCALANCE S627-2M (All versions >= V3.0 and < V4.1). Specially crafted packets sent to port 443/tcp of affected devices could cause a Denial-of-Service condition of the web server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-scalance_s623scalance_s612_firmwarescalance_s627-2m_firmwarescalance_s602scalance_s627-2mscalance_s602_firmwarescalance_s623_firmwarescalance_s612SCALANCE S627-2MSCALANCE S623SCALANCE S602SCALANCE S612
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2019-13921
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.44% / 62.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Oct, 2019 | 13:49
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC WinAC RTX (F) 2010 (All versions < SP3 Update 1). Affected versions of the software contain a vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to trigger a denial-of-service condition. The vulnerability can be triggered if a large HTTP request is sent to the executing service. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker with network access to the affected systems. Successful exploitation requires no system privileges and no user interaction. An attacker could use the vulnerability to compromise availability of the service provided by the software.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-simatic_winac_rtx_\(f\)_2010SIMATIC WinAC RTX (F) 2010
CWE ID-CWE-410
Insufficient Resource Pool
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CVE-2023-24534
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 14.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2023 | 15:50
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 16:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Excessive memory allocation in net/http and net/textproto

HTTP and MIME header parsing can allocate large amounts of memory, even when parsing small inputs, potentially leading to a denial of service. Certain unusual patterns of input data can cause the common function used to parse HTTP and MIME headers to allocate substantially more memory than required to hold the parsed headers. An attacker can exploit this behavior to cause an HTTP server to allocate large amounts of memory from a small request, potentially leading to memory exhaustion and a denial of service. With fix, header parsing now correctly allocates only the memory required to hold parsed headers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard libraryGo
Product-gonet/textproto
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • ...
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • Next
Details not found