Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2026-41246

Summary
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At-23 Apr, 2026 | 18:44
Updated At-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected At-
Credits

Contour: Lua code injection via Cookie Path Rewrite Policy

Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy. From v1.19.0 to before v1.33.4, v1.32.5, and v1.31.6, Contour's Cookie Rewriting feature is vulnerable to Lua code injection. An attacker with RBAC permissions to create or modify HTTPProxy resources can craft a malicious value in spec.routes[].cookieRewritePolicies[].pathRewrite.value or spec.routes[].services[].cookieRewritePolicies[].pathRewrite.value that results in arbitrary code execution in the Envoy proxy. The cookie rewriting feature is internally implemented using Envoy's HTTP Lua filter. User-controlled values are interpolated into Lua source code using Go text/template without sufficient sanitization. The injected code only executes when processing traffic on the attacker's own route, which they already control. However, since Envoy runs as shared infrastructure, the injected code can also read Envoy's xDS client credentials from the filesystem or cause denial of service for other tenants sharing the Envoy instance. This vulnerability is fixed in v1.33.4, v1.32.5, and v1.31.6.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID:a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At:23 Apr, 2026 | 18:44
Updated At:30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Contour: Lua code injection via Cookie Path Rewrite Policy

Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy. From v1.19.0 to before v1.33.4, v1.32.5, and v1.31.6, Contour's Cookie Rewriting feature is vulnerable to Lua code injection. An attacker with RBAC permissions to create or modify HTTPProxy resources can craft a malicious value in spec.routes[].cookieRewritePolicies[].pathRewrite.value or spec.routes[].services[].cookieRewritePolicies[].pathRewrite.value that results in arbitrary code execution in the Envoy proxy. The cookie rewriting feature is internally implemented using Envoy's HTTP Lua filter. User-controlled values are interpolated into Lua source code using Go text/template without sufficient sanitization. The injected code only executes when processing traffic on the attacker's own route, which they already control. However, since Envoy runs as shared infrastructure, the injected code can also read Envoy's xDS client credentials from the filesystem or cause denial of service for other tenants sharing the Envoy instance. This vulnerability is fixed in v1.33.4, v1.32.5, and v1.31.6.

Affected Products
Vendor
projectcontour
Product
contour
Versions
Affected
  • >= 1.33.0, < 1.33.4
  • >= 1.32.0, < 1.32.5
  • >= 1.19.0, < 1.31.6
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-94CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-94
Description: CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.18.1HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.1
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/security/advisories/GHSA-x4mj-7f9g-29h4
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/releases/tag/v1.31.6
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/releases/tag/v1.32.5
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/releases/tag/v1.33.4
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/security/advisories/GHSA-x4mj-7f9g-29h4
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/releases/tag/v1.31.6
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/releases/tag/v1.32.5
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/releases/tag/v1.33.4
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
2. Contour: Envoy: github.com/projectcontour/contour: Contour: Arbitrary Code Execution and Denial of Service via Lua Code Injection

A flaw was found in Contour, a Kubernetes ingress controller. An attacker with Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) permissions to manage HTTPProxy resources can exploit a Lua code injection vulnerability within Contour's Cookie Rewriting feature. By crafting a malicious value in specific configuration fields, the attacker can achieve arbitrary code execution in the Envoy proxy. This could allow them to read sensitive credentials from the filesystem or cause a denial of service for other users sharing the Envoy instance.

Affected Products
Vendor
Red Hat, Inc.Red Hat
Product
ExternalDNS Operator
CPEs
  • cpe:/a:redhat:ext_dns_optr:1
Default Status
unaffected
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-94Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-94
Description: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.18.1HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.1
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Metrics Other Info
Red Hat severity rating
value:
Important
namespace:
https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Reported to Red Hat.2026-04-23 20:01:47
Made public.2026-04-23 18:44:39
Event: Reported to Red Hat.
Date: 2026-04-23 20:01:47
Event: Made public.
Date: 2026-04-23 18:44:39
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41246
vdb-entry
x_refsource_REDHAT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2461257
issue-tracking
x_refsource_REDHAT
https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-41246.json
x_sadp-csaf-vex
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41246
Resource:
vdb-entry
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2461257
Resource:
issue-tracking
x_refsource_REDHAT
Hyperlink: https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-41246.json
Resource:
x_sadp-csaf-vex
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security-advisories@github.com
Published At:23 Apr, 2026 | 19:17
Updated At:30 Jun, 2026 | 03:19

Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy. From v1.19.0 to before v1.33.4, v1.32.5, and v1.31.6, Contour's Cookie Rewriting feature is vulnerable to Lua code injection. An attacker with RBAC permissions to create or modify HTTPProxy resources can craft a malicious value in spec.routes[].cookieRewritePolicies[].pathRewrite.value or spec.routes[].services[].cookieRewritePolicies[].pathRewrite.value that results in arbitrary code execution in the Envoy proxy. The cookie rewriting feature is internally implemented using Envoy's HTTP Lua filter. User-controlled values are interpolated into Lua source code using Go text/template without sufficient sanitization. The injected code only executes when processing traffic on the attacker's own route, which they already control. However, since Envoy runs as shared infrastructure, the injected code can also read Envoy's xDS client credentials from the filesystem or cause denial of service for other tenants sharing the Envoy instance. This vulnerability is fixed in v1.33.4, v1.32.5, and v1.31.6.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.18.1HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Secondary3.18.1HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
N/A
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.1
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.1
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Type: N/A
Version:
Base score:
Base severity: N/A
Vector:
CPE Matches

projectcontour
projectcontour
>>contour>>Versions from 1.19.0(inclusive) to 1.31.6(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:projectcontour:contour:*:*:*:*:*:kubernetes:*:*
projectcontour
projectcontour
>>contour>>Versions from 1.32.0(inclusive) to 1.32.5(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:projectcontour:contour:*:*:*:*:*:kubernetes:*:*
projectcontour
projectcontour
>>contour>>Versions from 1.33.0(inclusive) to 1.33.4(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:projectcontour:contour:*:*:*:*:*:kubernetes:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-94Primarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE-94Secondary0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
CWE ID: CWE-94
Type: Primary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-94
Type: Secondary
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/releases/tag/v1.31.6security-advisories@github.com
Release Notes
https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/releases/tag/v1.32.5security-advisories@github.com
Release Notes
https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/releases/tag/v1.33.4security-advisories@github.com
Release Notes
https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/security/advisories/GHSA-x4mj-7f9g-29h4security-advisories@github.com
Patch
Vendor Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-412460b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
N/A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=24612570b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
N/A
https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-41246.json0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/releases/tag/v1.31.6
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Release Notes
Hyperlink: https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/releases/tag/v1.32.5
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Release Notes
Hyperlink: https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/releases/tag/v1.33.4
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Release Notes
Hyperlink: https://github.com/projectcontour/contour/security/advisories/GHSA-x4mj-7f9g-29h4
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41246
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2461257
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-41246.json
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

74Records found

CVE-2026-43618
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-6.1||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.78% / 51.43%
||
7 Day CHG+0.14%
Published-20 May, 2026 | 00:50
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Rsync < 3.4.3 Integer Overflow Information Disclosure

Rsync version 3.4.2 and prior contain an integer overflow vulnerability in the compressed-token decoder where a 32-bit signed counter is not checked for overflow, allowing a malicious sender to trigger an overflow that causes the receiver process to read and return data from outside the intended buffer bounds. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability to disclose process memory contents including environment variables, passwords, heap and stack data, and library memory pointers, significantly reducing ASLR effectiveness and facilitating further exploitation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-RsyncProjectSambaRed Hat, Inc.
Product-rsyncrsyncRed Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS (v. 10)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS (v. 8)Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS (v. 9)Red Hat Discovery 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10)
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CWE ID-CWE-190
Integer Overflow or Wraparound
CVE-2026-43112
Matching Score-8
Assigner-kernel.org
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-kernel.org
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.34% / 25.85%
||
7 Day CHG+0.04%
Published-06 May, 2026 | 07:40
Updated-03 Jul, 2026 | 13:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
fs/smb/client: fix out-of-bounds read in cifs_sanitize_prepath

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/smb/client: fix out-of-bounds read in cifs_sanitize_prepath When cifs_sanitize_prepath is called with an empty string or a string containing only delimiters (e.g., "/"), the current logic attempts to check *(cursor2 - 1) before cursor2 has advanced. This results in an out-of-bounds read. This patch adds an early exit check after stripping prepended delimiters. If no path content remains, the function returns NULL. The bug was identified via manual audit and verified using a standalone test case compiled with AddressSanitizer, which triggered a SEGV on affected inputs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Linux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelLinuxRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS (v. 10)Red Hat Enterprise Linux Real Time (v. 10)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux Real Time for NFV (v. 10)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux CodeReady Linux Builder (v. 10)Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CVE-2018-10927
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.1||HIGH
EPSS-2.77% / 84.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Sep, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 07:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in RPC request using gfs3_lookup_req in glusterfs server. An authenticated attacker could use this flaw to leak information and execute remote denial of service by crashing gluster brick process.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-glusterDebian GNU/LinuxRed Hat, Inc.openSUSE
Product-enterprise_linux_serverdebian_linuxvirtualization_hostglusterfsleapglusterfs
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-200
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CVE-2023-1832
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.48% / 38.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Oct, 2023 | 13:05
Updated-19 Sep, 2024 | 14:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper authorization check in the server component

An improper access control flaw was found in Candlepin. An attacker can create data scoped under another customer/tenant, which can result in loss of confidentiality and availability for the affected customer/tenant.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-candlepinprojectn/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-candlepinsatellitecandlepin-4.3.7candlepin-4.3.8Red Hat Satellite 6
CWE ID-CWE-284
Improper Access Control
CWE ID-CWE-863
Incorrect Authorization
CVE-2023-1194
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.1||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 60.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Nov, 2023 | 07:41
Updated-20 Mar, 2025 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Use-after-free in parse_lease_state()

An out-of-bounds (OOB) memory read flaw was found in parse_lease_state in the KSMBD implementation of the in-kernel samba server and CIFS in the Linux kernel. When an attacker sends the CREATE command with a malformed payload to KSMBD, due to a missing check of `NameOffset` in the `parse_lease_state()` function, the `create_context` object can access invalid memory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aFedora ProjectRed Hat, Inc.Linux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelfedoraRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6kernelRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7FedoraRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CWE ID-CWE-416
Use After Free
CVE-2025-5318
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-2.39% / 81.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Jun, 2025 | 14:10
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 11:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Libssh: out-of-bounds read in sftp_handle()

A flaw was found in the libssh library in versions less than 0.11.2. An out-of-bounds read can be triggered in the sftp_handle function due to an incorrect comparison check that permits the function to access memory beyond the valid handle list and to return an invalid pointer, which is used in further processing. This vulnerability allows an authenticated remote attacker to potentially read unintended memory regions, exposing sensitive information or affect service behavior.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libsshRed Hat, Inc.
Product-openshift_container_platformenterprise_linuxlibsshRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update ServiceRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update SupportRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-OnRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.13Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3.7.1Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update ServiceRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CVE-2026-52860
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 12.91%
||
7 Day CHG-0.00%
Published-11 Jun, 2026 | 18:33
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vim: Arbitrary Code Execution via Python Omni-Completion

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to version 9.2.0597, Vim's Python omni-completion executes reconstructed function and class definitions from the current buffer with exec() as part of populating the completion dictionary. Python evaluates function default values, parameter annotations, and class base expressions at definition time, so a hostile buffer can execute attacker-controlled Python expressions during omni-completion. The existing g:pythoncomplete_allow_import mitigation (GHSA-52mc-rq6p-rc7c) does not cover this path, because the attacker-controlled code is not a harvested import/from statement. This issue has been patched in version 9.2.0597.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-VimRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vimvimRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-48962
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CPAN Security Group
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-CPAN Security Group
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 20.91%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-27 May, 2026 | 03:12
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 03:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IO::Compress versions before 2.220 for Perl can execute arbitrary code in File::GlobMapper via an attacker-controlled output glob

IO::Compress versions before 2.220 for Perl can execute arbitrary code in File::GlobMapper via an attacker-controlled output glob. _parseOutputGlob() wraps the caller-supplied output glob string in double quotes and stores it in the parser state; _getFiles() then runs the stored expression through eval STRING. A literal double quote in the output glob closes the dquote wrapper, and the characters that follow are evaluated as Perl. Arbitrary Perl in the output glob executes at the calling process's privilege.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-PMQSRed Hat, Inc.
Product-IO::CompressRed Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS (v. 8)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.2)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS AUS (v.8.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v. 10.0)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS AUS (v.8.4)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS E4S (v.8.8)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.4)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS EUS EXTENSION (v.8.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS TUS (v.8.8)Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS EUS EXTENSION (v.8.4)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10)
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-95
Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
CVE-2026-47162
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 12.29%
||
7 Day CHG-0.05%
Published-11 Jun, 2026 | 18:32
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vim: Vimscript Code Injection in netrw NetrwBookHistSave() via crafted directory name

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to version 9.2.0495, a Vimscript code injection vulnerability exists in s:NetrwBookHistSave() in the netrw plugin (runtime/pack/dist/opt/netrw/autoload/netrw.vim) when serializing browsed directory paths to the history file ~/.vim/.netrwhist. A directory name derived from the filesystem is interpolated into a single-quoted Vimscript string literal without escaping embedded single quotes, allowing a crafted directory name to break out of the string context and execute arbitrary Vimscript, including shell commands via system() and :!, the next time the history file is sourced. This issue has been patched in version 9.2.0495.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-VimRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vimvimRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
CWE ID-CWE-140
Improper Neutralization of Delimiters
CWE ID-CWE-74
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-6951
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-9.2||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.88% / 54.60%
||
7 Day CHG-0.22%
Published-25 Apr, 2026 | 05:00
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Versions of the package simple-git before 3.36.0 are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to an incomplete fix for [CVE-2022-25912](https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-SIMPLEGIT-3112221) that blocks the -c option but not the equivalent --config form. If untrusted input can reach the options argument passed to simple-git, an attacker may still achieve remote code execution by enabling protocol.ext.allow=always and using an ext:: clone source.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-simple-git_projectn/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-simple-gitorg.webjars.npm:simple-gitsimple-gitRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack
CWE ID-CWE-88
Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-45829
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HiddenLayer, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HiddenLayer, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-12.39% / 95.71%
||
7 Day CHG+2.12%
Published-18 May, 2026 | 15:59
Updated-29 Jun, 2026 | 12:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A pre-authentication, code injection vulnerability in version 1.0.0 or later of the ChromaDB Python project allows an unauthenticated attacker to run arbitrary code on the server by sending a malicious model repository and trust_remote_code set to true in the /api/v2/tenants/{tenant}/databases/{db}/collections endpoint.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ChromaRed Hat, Inc.
Product-ChromaDBRed Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-45833
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HiddenLayer, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HiddenLayer, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.4||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.34% / 26.22%
||
7 Day CHG+0.05%
Published-12 Jun, 2026 | 15:16
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A code injection vulnerability in version 0.4.17 or later of the ChromaDB Python project allows an authenticated attacker to run arbitrary code on the server by sending a malicious model repository and trust_remote_code set to true in the /api/v2/tenants/default_tenant/databases/default_database/collections/{collection_id} if they have the UPDATE_COLLECTION permission.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-trychromaChromaRed Hat, Inc.
Product-chromadbChromaDBRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-44293
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.33% / 24.70%
||
7 Day CHG+0.03%
Published-13 May, 2026 | 14:43
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
protobufjs: Code injection through bytes field defaults in generated toObject code

protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. Prior to 7.5.6 and 8.0.2, protobufjs generated JavaScript for toObject conversion could include an unsafe expression derived from a schema-controlled bytes field default value. A crafted descriptor with a non-string default value for a bytes field could cause attacker-controlled code to be emitted into the generated conversion function. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.6 and 8.0.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-protobufjs_projectprotobufjsRed Hat, Inc.
Product-protobufjsprotobuf.jsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.22Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9Red Hat Build of Podman DesktopRed Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6OpenShift PipelinesRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Hardened ImagesRed Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-44005
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.84% / 53.41%
||
7 Day CHG+0.28%
Published-13 May, 2026 | 17:40
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vm2: Sandbox escape

vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. From 3.9.6 to 3.10.5, vm2's bridge exposes mutable proxies for real host-realm intrinsic prototypes and then forwards sandbox writes into the underlying host objects with otherReflectSet() and otherReflectDefineProperty(), which lets attacker-controlled JavaScript running in a default VM or inherited NodeVM mutate shared host Object.prototype, Array.prototype, and Function.prototype from inside the sandbox This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vm2_projectpatriksimekRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vm2vm2Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Developer Hub
CWE ID-CWE-1321
Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
CWE ID-CWE-653
Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2025-69872
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.51% / 39.69%
||
7 Day CHG-0.04%
Published-11 Feb, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-03 Jul, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

DiskCache (python-diskcache) through 5.6.3 uses Python pickle for serialization by default. An attacker with write access to the cache directory can achieve arbitrary code execution when a victim application reads from the cache.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-n/aRed Hat AI Inference ServerRed Hat Satellite 6Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-44495
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7||HIGH
EPSS-0.50% / 38.81%
||
7 Day CHG+0.27%
Published-11 Jun, 2026 | 15:33
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 12:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Axios: Credential Theft and Response Hijacking via Prototype Pollution Gadget in Config Merge

Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 0.19.0 to before 0.31.1 and 1.15.2, Axios contains prototype-pollution gadgets in request config processing. If another vulnerability in the same JavaScript process has already polluted Object.prototype.transformResponse, affected Axios versions may treat that inherited value as request configuration or as an option validator. Axios does not itself create the prototype pollution. Exploitability requires a separate prototype-pollution vulnerability or equivalent attacker control over Object.prototype before Axios creates a request. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.31.1 and 1.15.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-axiosRed Hat, Inc.
Product-axiosRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9Red Hat Quay 3OpenShift PipelinesRed Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech PreviewRed Hat Satellite 6Red Hat Discovery 2Red Hat Container Native Virtualization 4.14Network Observability OperatorRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Trusted Profile AnalyzerRed Hat OpenShift Dev SpacesRed Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10Red Hat Fuse 7Gatekeeper 3Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13Migration Toolkit for ContainersRed Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Trusted Artifact SignerOpenShift Service Mesh 3Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4Cryostat 4Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20Migration Toolkit for Applications 8Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16Red Hat AMQ Broker 7Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
CWE ID-CWE-1321
Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
CWE ID-CWE-915
Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-4800
Matching Score-6
Assigner-ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-1.74% / 74.89%
||
7 Day CHG+0.71%
Published-31 Mar, 2026 | 19:25
Updated-03 Jul, 2026 | 13:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
lodash vulnerable to Code Injection via `_.template` imports key names

Impact: The fix for CVE-2021-23337 (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-35jh-r3h4-6jhm) added validation for the variable option in _.template but did not apply the same validation to options.imports key names. Both paths flow into the same Function() constructor sink. When an application passes untrusted input as options.imports key names, an attacker can inject default-parameter expressions that execute arbitrary code at template compilation time. Additionally, _.template uses assignInWith to merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties via for..in. If Object.prototype has been polluted by any other vector, the polluted keys are copied into the imports object and passed to Function(). Patches: Users should upgrade to version 4.18.0. Workarounds: Do not pass untrusted input as key names in options.imports. Only use developer-controlled, static key names.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lodashlodashRed Hat, Inc.
Product-lodash-eslodashlodash-amdlodash.templatelodash-eslodashlodash-amdlodash.templateRed Hat Developer Hub 1.8Red Hat Directory Server 13Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability (v. 10)Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.8.6)Red Hat Quay 3Red Hat Enterprise Linux HighAvailability EUS EXTENSION (v.8.4)Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3.9.3Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage EUS (v.9.4)Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.18Red Hat Directory Server 11Red Hat Directory Server 12Red Hat Developer HubMulticluster Engine for KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.22Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5Red Hat Build of Podman DesktopRed Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2Red Hat OpenShift GitOpsRed Hat Discovery 2Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Trusted Profile AnalyzerRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability (v. 9)Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.16Gatekeeper 3Migration Toolkit for ContainersRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackRed Hat OpenShift AI 3.3Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2Node HealthCheck OperatorRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9OpenShift Service Mesh 3Red Hat Trusted Artifact SignerRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux ResilientStorage E4S (v.9.0)Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.9.2)Migration Toolkit for Applications 8Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9OpenShift LightspeedRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability TUS (v.8.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability EUS (v. 10.0)Red Hat Build of KeycloakRed Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability EUS (v.9.4)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10)Red Hat Satellite 6.18OpenShift PipelinesRed Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.19Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.9Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.2Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.1Streams for Apache Kafka 3.2.0Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.9.0)Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18Red Hat Satellite 6Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability EUS (v.9.6)Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.8.8)Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability AUS (v.8.4)Confidential Compute AttestationRed Hat Edge Manager 1Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage (v. 9)Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage EUS (v.9.6)Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShiftRed Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability TUS (v.8.8)Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.17Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Cryostat 4Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.19Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20Red Hat Single Sign-On 7Red Hat Connectivity Link 1Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage E4S (v.9.2)Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-44006
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.81% / 52.59%
||
7 Day CHG+0.22%
Published-13 May, 2026 | 17:31
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vm2: Sandbox Escape

vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to 3.11.0, It is possible to reach BaseHandler.getPrototypeOf, which can be used to get arbitrary prototypes. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vm2_projectpatriksimekRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vm2vm2Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Developer Hub
CWE ID-CWE-914
Improper Control of Dynamically-Identified Variables
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-44513
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.86% / 54.19%
||
7 Day CHG+0.18%
Published-14 May, 2026 | 16:26
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Diffusers: `trust_remote_code` bypass via `custom_pipeline` and local custom components

Diffusers is the a library for pretrained diffusion models. Prior to 0.38.0, a trust_remote_code bypass in DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained allows arbitrary remote code execution despite the user passing trust_remote_code=False (or omitting it, which is the default). The vulnerability has three variants, all sharing the same root cause — the trust_remote_code gate was implemented inside DiffusionPipeline.download() rather than at the actual dynamic-module load site, so any code path that bypassed or short-circuited download() also bypassed the security check. DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('repoA', custom_pipeline='attacker/repoB', trust_remote_code=False) — the gate evaluated against repoA's file list rather than repoB's, so repoB's pipeline.py was loaded and executed. DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('/local/snapshot', custom_pipeline='attacker/repoB', trust_remote_code=False) — the local-path branch never invoked download(), so the gate was never reached and remote code from repoB executed. DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('/local/snapshot', trust_remote_code=False) where the snapshot contains custom component files (e.g. unet/my_unet_model.py) referenced from model_index.json — same root cause; the local path skipped download() and custom component code executed. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.38.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-huggingfacehuggingfaceRed Hat, Inc.
Product-diffusersdiffusersRed Hat AI Inference ServerRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3
CWE ID-CWE-358
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-44016
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.38% / 30.38%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-24 Jun, 2026 | 17:42
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Docling: Unsafe Playwright-based HTML Rendering

Docling simplifies document processing by parsing diverse formats and providing integrations with the generative AI ecosystem. FIn versions >= 2.82.0, < 2.91.0, if the HTML backend was explicitly configured for rendering (rendering option by default deactivated), then the Playwright-based rendering feature could allow JavaScript execution and unrestricted network access when processing untrusted HTML documents. An attacker could craft malicious HTML that executes arbitrary JavaScript in the rendering context or makes unauthorized network requests to internal services, potentially leading to SSRF attacks, data exfiltration, or remote code execution in the rendering environment. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.91.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-doclingdocling-projectRed Hat, Inc.
Product-doclingdoclingRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-918
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2025-24293
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-9.2||CRITICAL
EPSS-2.39% / 81.91%
||
7 Day CHG+0.31%
Published-30 Jan, 2026 | 20:11
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

# Active Storage allowed transformation methods potentially unsafe Active Storage attempts to prevent the use of potentially unsafe image transformation methods and parameters by default. The default allowed list contains three methods allow for the circumvention of the safe defaults which enables potential command injection vulnerabilities in cases where arbitrary user supplied input is accepted as valid transformation methods or parameters. Impact ------ This vulnerability impacts applications that use Active Storage with the image_processing processing gem in addition to mini_magick as the image processor. Vulnerable code will look something similar to this: ``` <%= image_tag blob.variant(params[:t] => params[:v]) %> ``` Where the transformation method or its arguments are untrusted arbitrary input. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately. Workarounds ----------- Consuming user supplied input for image transformation methods or their parameters is unsupported behavior and should be considered dangerous. Strict validation of user supplied methods and parameters should be performed as well as having a strong [ImageMagick security policy](https://imagemagick.org/script/security-policy.php) deployed. Credits ------- Thank you [lio346](https://hackerone.com/lio346) for reporting this!

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ruby on RailsRed Hat, Inc.
Product-activestorageRed Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2Red Hat Satellite 6
CWE ID-CWE-77
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-88
Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-43997
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-10||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.98% / 57.77%
||
7 Day CHG+0.24%
Published-13 May, 2026 | 17:17
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vm2: Sandbox Escape

vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to 3.11.0, it is possible to obtain the host Object. There are various ways to use the host Object, to escape the sandbox, one example would be using HostObject.getOwnPropertySymbols to obtain Symbol(nodejs.util.inspect.custom). This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vm2_projectpatriksimekRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vm2vm2Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Developer Hub
CWE ID-CWE-653
Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2021-47952
Matching Score-6
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.70% / 48.48%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-16 May, 2026 | 15:26
Updated-27 Jun, 2026 | 05:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
python jsonpickle 2.0.0 Remote Code Execution via py/repr

python jsonpickle 2.0.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to execute arbitrary Python commands by deserializing malicious JSON payloads containing py/repr objects. Attackers can craft JSON strings with py/repr directives that invoke the eval function during deserialization to execute arbitrary code.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-JsonpickleRed Hat, Inc.
Product-python jsonpickleRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
CWE ID-CWE-502
Deserialization of Untrusted Data
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-42203
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.37% / 29.31%
||
7 Day CHG+0.05%
Published-08 May, 2026 | 03:36
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
LiteLLM: Server-Side Template Injection in /prompts/test endpoint

LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. From version 1.80.5 to before version 1.83.7, the POST /prompts/test endpoint accepted user-supplied prompt templates and rendered them without sandboxing. A crafted template could run arbitrary code inside the LiteLLM Proxy process. The endpoint only checks that the caller presents a valid proxy API key, so any authenticated user could reach it. Depending on how the proxy is deployed, this could expose secrets in the process environment (such as provider API keys or database credentials) and allow commands to be run on the host. This issue has been patched in version 1.83.7.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-litellmBerriAIRed Hat, Inc.
Product-litellmlitellmExploit IntelligenceRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-1336
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-41139
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.58% / 43.29%
||
7 Day CHG+0.06%
Published-07 May, 2026 | 05:06
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Unsafe array index getter in mathjs

Math.js is an extensive math library for JavaScript and Node.js. From version 13.1.0 to before version 15.2.0, arbitrary JavaScript can be executed via the expression parser of mathjs. This issue has been patched in version 15.2.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mathjsjosdejongRed Hat, Inc.
Product-mathjsmathjsRed Hat Developer HubRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Self-service automation portal 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Cryostat 4
CWE ID-CWE-915
Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-41523
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.46% / 36.82%
||
7 Day CHG+0.03%
Published-22 Jun, 2026 | 22:18
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vLLM: Security Check Bypass via assert Statement in Activation Function Loading Allows Arbitrary Code Execution

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.22.0, an assert-based security check in vLLM's activation function loading allows any unauthenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution on the server by publishing a malicious HuggingFace model, when vLLM runs in Python optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1). This vulnerability is fixed in 0.22.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vllmvllm-projectRed Hat, Inc.
Product-vllmvllmRed Hat AI Inference ServerRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3
CWE ID-CWE-617
Reachable Assertion
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-41044
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.98% / 57.89%
||
7 Day CHG+0.21%
Published-24 Apr, 2026 | 10:16
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 03:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All: Authenticated user can perform RCE via DestinationView MBean exposed by Jolokia

Improper Input Validation, Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All. An authenticated attacker can use the admin web console page to construct a malicious broker name that bypasses name validation to include an xbean binding that can be later used by a VM transport to load a remote Spring XML application. The attacker can then use the DestinationView mbean to send a message to trigger a VM transport creation that will reference this malicious broker name which can lead to loading the malicious Spring XML context file. Because Spring's ResourceXmlApplicationContext instantiates all singleton beans before the BrokerService validates the configuration, arbitrary code execution occurs on the broker's JVM through bean factory methods such as Runtime.exec(). This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.6, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.5; Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.6, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.5; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.6, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.5. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.2.5 or 5.19.6, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationRed Hat, Inc.
Product-activemqactivemq_brokerApache ActiveMQ AllApache ActiveMQApache ActiveMQ BrokerRed Hat AMQ Broker 7Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-41179
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.2||CRITICAL
EPSS-9.20% / 94.71%
||
7 Day CHG+0.82%
Published-23 Apr, 2026 | 00:03
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
RClone: Unauthenticated operations/fsinfo allows attacker-controlled backend instantiation and local command execution

Rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Starting in version 1.48.0 and prior to version 1.73.5, the RC endpoint `operations/fsinfo` is exposed without `AuthRequired: true` and accepts attacker-controlled `fs` input. Because `rc.GetFs(...)` supports inline backend definitions, an unauthenticated attacker can instantiate an attacker-controlled backend on demand. For the WebDAV backend, `bearer_token_command` is executed during backend initialization, making single-request unauthenticated local command execution possible on reachable RC deployments without global HTTP authentication. Version 1.73.5 patches the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rclonercloneRed Hat, Inc.
Product-rclonercloneRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2OpenShift API for Data Protection
CWE ID-CWE-306
Missing Authentication for Critical Function
CWE ID-CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-41242
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.4||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.74% / 50.26%
||
7 Day CHG+0.17%
Published-18 Apr, 2026 | 16:18
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
protobufjs has an arbitrary code execution issue

protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. In versions prior to 8.0.1 and 7.5.5, attackers can inject arbitrary code in the "type" fields of protobuf definitions, which will then execute during object decoding using that definition. Versions 8.0.1 and 7.5.5 patch the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-protobufjs_projectprotobufjsRed Hat, Inc.
Product-protobufjsprotobuf.jsRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat Hardened ImagesSelf-service automation portal 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3Cryostat 4Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Red Hat Build of Podman DesktopRed Hat Developer HubRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3OpenShift PipelinesRed Hat Ceph Storage 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9OpenShift Service Mesh 3
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-8094
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.45% / 35.76%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-07 May, 2026 | 12:45
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Other issue in the WebRTC component

Other issue in the WebRTC component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox ESR 140.10.2 and Thunderbird 140.10.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Mozilla Corporation
Product-firefoxthunderbirdThunderbirdFirefoxRed Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v. 10.0)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.4)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS EXTENSION (v.8.4)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.8)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.2)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.8)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS EXTENSION (v.8.6)Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2025-14576
Matching Score-6
Assigner-The Qt Company
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-The Qt Company
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 12.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Apr, 2026 | 12:39
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Possible QML code injection in VectorImage component

Insufficient validation of node IDs in Qt SVG module allows arbitrary QML/JavaScript code injection when loading malicious SVG files through the VectorImage component in Qt Quick. While QML execution is typically more restricted than native code execution, this could still lead to denial of service, information disclosure, or other impacts depending on the application's privilege level and data access.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-qtThe Qt CompanyRed Hat, Inc.
Product-qtdeclarativeQtMulticluster Global HubRed Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v. 10.0)Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat OpenShift GitOpsRed Hat Enterprise Linux CodeReady Linux Builder (v. 10)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Hardened ImagesRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v. 10.0)Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10)
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-40217
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-6.50% / 92.93%
||
7 Day CHG+5.77%
Published-10 Apr, 2026 | 13:43
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

LiteLLM through 2026-04-08 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via bytecode rewriting at the /guardrails/test_custom_code URI.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-litellmBerriAIRed Hat, Inc.
Product-litellmLiteLLMRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3Lightspeed Core
CWE ID-CWE-420
Unprotected Alternate Channel
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2025-14287
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Protect AI (formerly huntr.dev)
CVSS Score-7.8||HIGH
EPSS-1.46% / 70.30%
||
7 Day CHG+0.22%
Published-15 Mar, 2026 | 09:27
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Command Injection in mlflow/mlflow

A command injection vulnerability exists in mlflow/mlflow versions before v3.7.0, specifically in the `mlflow/sagemaker/__init__.py` file at lines 161-167. The vulnerability arises from the direct interpolation of user-supplied container image names into shell commands without proper sanitization, which are then executed using `os.system()`. This allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands by supplying malicious input through the `--container` parameter of the CLI. The issue affects environments where MLflow is used, including development setups, CI/CD pipelines, and cloud deployments.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lfprojectsmlflowRed Hat, Inc.
Product-mlflowmlflow/mlflowRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-40466
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-4.78% / 90.84%
||
7 Day CHG+0.81%
Published-24 Apr, 2026 | 10:15
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 03:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ: Possible bypass of CVE-2026-34197 via HTTP discovery second-stage URI

Improper Input Validation, Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ. An authenticated attacker may bypass the fix in CVE-2026-34197 by adding a connector using an HTTP Discovery transport via BrokerView.addNetworkConnector or BrokerView.addConnector through Jolokia if the activemq-http module is on the classpath. A malicious HTTP endpoint can return a VM transport through the HTTP URI which will bypass the validation added in CVE-2026-34197. The attacker can then use the VM transport's brokerConfig parameter to load a remote Spring XML application context using ResourceXmlApplicationContext. Because Spring's ResourceXmlApplicationContext instantiates all singleton beans before the BrokerService validates the configuration, arbitrary code execution occurs on the broker's JVM through bean factory methods such as Runtime.exec(). This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.6, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.5; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.6, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.5; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.6, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.5. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.19.6 or 6.2.5, which fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationRed Hat, Inc.
Product-activemqactivemq_brokerApache ActiveMQ AllApache ActiveMQApache ActiveMQ BrokerRed Hat AMQ Broker 7Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-35093
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 8.20%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-01 Apr, 2026 | 13:54
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Libinput: libinput: unauthorized code execution and information disclosure through lua bytecode plugins

A flaw was found in libinput. A local attacker who can place a specially crafted Lua bytecode file in certain system or user configuration directories can bypass security restrictions. This allows the attacker to run unauthorized code with the same permissions as the program using libinput, such as a graphical compositor. This could lead to the attacker monitoring keyboard input and sending that information to an external location.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fedora ProjectRed Hat, Inc.freedesktop.org
Product-libinputfedoraRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-33937
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.74% / 74.94%
||
7 Day CHG+0.45%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 21:03
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion

Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.7.8, `Handlebars.compile()` accepts a pre-parsed AST object in addition to a template string. The `value` field of a `NumberLiteral` AST node is emitted directly into the generated JavaScript without quoting or sanitization. An attacker who can supply a crafted AST to `compile()` can therefore inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript, leading to Remote Code Execution on the server. Version 4.7.9 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. Validate input type before calling `Handlebars.compile()`; ensure the argument is always a `string`, never a plain object or JSON-deserialized value. Use the Handlebars runtime-only build (`handlebars/runtime`) on the server if templates are pre-compiled at build time; `compile()` will be unavailable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-handlebarsjshandlebars-langRed Hat, Inc.
Product-handlebarshandlebars.jsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Cryostat 4Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-843
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-33943
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.79% / 51.69%
||
7 Day CHG+0.05%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 21:15
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Happy DOM ECMAScriptModuleCompiler: unsanitized export names are interpolated as executable code

Happy DOM is a JavaScript implementation of a web browser without its graphical user interface. In versions 15.10.0 through 20.8.7, a code injection vulnerability in `ECMAScriptModuleCompiler` allows an attacker to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) by injecting arbitrary JavaScript expressions inside `export { }` declarations in ES module scripts processed by happy-dom. The compiler directly interpolates unsanitized content into generated code as an executable expression, and the quote filter does not strip backticks, allowing template literal-based payloads to bypass sanitization. Version 20.8.8 fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-capricorn86capricorn86Red Hat, Inc.
Product-happy_domhappy-domRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
CWE ID-CWE-917
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-33938
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.69% / 48.35%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 21:05
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion by tampering @partial-block

Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.7.8, the `@partial-block` special variable is stored in the template data context and is reachable and mutable from within a template via helpers that accept arbitrary objects. When a helper overwrites `@partial-block` with a crafted Handlebars AST, a subsequent invocation of `{{> @partial-block}}` compiles and executes that AST, enabling arbitrary JavaScript execution on the server. Version 4.7.9 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. First, use the runtime-only build (`require('handlebars/runtime')`). The `compile()` method is absent, eliminating the vulnerable fallback path. Second, audit registered helpers for any that write arbitrary values to context objects. Helpers should treat context data as read-only. Third, avoid registering helpers from third-party packages (such as `handlebars-helpers`) in contexts where templates or context data can be influenced by untrusted input.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-handlebarsjshandlebars-langRed Hat, Inc.
Product-handlebarshandlebars.jsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Cryostat 4Red Hat Process Automation 7Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-843
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CWE ID-CWE-917
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-33941
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.3||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 20.84%
||
7 Day CHG-0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 21:13
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection in CLI Precompiler via Unescaped Names and Options

Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.7.8, the Handlebars CLI precompiler (`bin/handlebars` / `lib/precompiler.js`) concatenates user-controlled strings — template file names and several CLI options — directly into the JavaScript it emits, without any escaping or sanitization. An attacker who can influence template filenames or CLI arguments can inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes when the generated bundle is loaded in Node.js or a browser. Version 4.7.9 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. First, validate all CLI inputs before invoking the precompiler. Reject filenames and option values that contain characters with JavaScript string-escaping significance (`"`, `'`, `;`, etc.). Second, use a fixed, trusted namespace string passed via a configuration file rather than command-line arguments in automated pipelines. Third, run the precompiler in a sandboxed environment (container with no write access to sensitive paths) to limit the impact of successful exploitation. Fourth, audit template filenames in any repository or package that is consumed by an automated build pipeline.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-handlebarsjshandlebars-langRed Hat, Inc.
Product-handlebarshandlebars.jsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Cryostat 4Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-116
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CWE ID-CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-34197
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-96.67% / 99.88%
||
7 Day CHG+0.36%
Published-07 Apr, 2026 | 07:50
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 20:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Known KEV||Action Due Date - 2026-04-30||Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ: Authenticated users could perform RCE via Jolokia MBeans

Improper Input Validation, Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ. Apache ActiveMQ Classic exposes the Jolokia JMX-HTTP bridge at /api/jolokia/ on the web console. The default Jolokia access policy permits exec operations on all ActiveMQ MBeans (org.apache.activemq:*), including BrokerService.addNetworkConnector(String) and BrokerService.addConnector(String). An authenticated attacker can invoke these operations with a crafted discovery URI that triggers the VM transport's brokerConfig parameter to load a remote Spring XML application context using ResourceXmlApplicationContext. Because Spring's ResourceXmlApplicationContext instantiates all singleton beans before the BrokerService validates the configuration, arbitrary code execution occurs on the broker's JVM through bean factory methods such as Runtime.exec(). This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.3; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.3; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.19.4 or 6.2.3, which fixes the issue

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.The Apache Software Foundation
Product-activemqactivemq_brokerApache ActiveMQ AllApache ActiveMQApache ActiveMQ BrokerRed Hat AMQ Broker 7Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Fuse 7Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackActiveMQ
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-33940
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.69% / 48.14%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 21:11
Updated-02 Jul, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion when passing an object as dynamic partial

Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.7.8, a crafted object placed in the template context can bypass all conditional guards in `resolvePartial()` and cause `invokePartial()` to return `undefined`. The Handlebars runtime then treats the unresolved partial as a source that needs to be compiled, passing the crafted object to `env.compile()`. Because the object is a valid Handlebars AST containing injected code, the generated JavaScript executes arbitrary commands on the server. The attack requires the adversary to control a value that can be returned by a dynamic partial lookup. Version 4.7.9 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. First, use the runtime-only build (`require('handlebars/runtime')`). Without `compile()`, the fallback compilation path in `invokePartial` is unreachable. Second, sanitize context data before rendering: Ensure no value in the context is a non-primitive object that could be passed to a dynamic partial. Third, avoid dynamic partial lookups (`{{> (lookup ...)}}`) when context data is user-controlled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-handlebarsjshandlebars-langRed Hat, Inc.
Product-handlebarshandlebars.jsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Data Grid 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Cryostat 4Red Hat Process Automation 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-843
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-33414
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.61% / 44.71%
||
7 Day CHG+0.10%
Published-14 Apr, 2026 | 22:42
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PowerShell Command Injection in Podman HyperV Machine

Podman is a tool for managing OCI containers and pods. Versions 4.8.0 through 5.8.1 contain a command injection vulnerability in the HyperV machine backend in pkg/machine/hyperv/stubber.go, where the VM image path is inserted into a PowerShell double-quoted string without sanitization, allowing $() subexpression injection. Because PowerShell evaluates subexpressions inside double-quoted strings before executing the outer command, an attacker who can control the VM image path through a crafted machine name or image directory can execute arbitrary PowerShell commands with the privileges of the Podman process. On typical Windows installations this means SYSTEM-level code execution, and only Windows is affected as the code is exclusive to the HyperV backend. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-podman_projectcontainersMicrosoft CorporationRed Hat, Inc.
Product-windowspodmanpodmanRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Hardened ImagesRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CWE ID-CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-32640
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.51% / 39.85%
||
7 Day CHG+0.05%
Published-13 Mar, 2026 | 21:03
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
(SimpleEval) Objects (including modules) can leak dangerous modules through to direct access inside the sandbox.

SimpleEval is a library for adding evaluatable expressions into python projects. Prior to 1.0.5, objects (including modules) can leak dangerous modules through to direct access inside the sandbox. If the objects you've passed in as names to SimpleEval have modules or other disallowed / dangerous objects available as attrs. Additionally, dangerous functions or modules could be accessed by passing them as callbacks to other safe functions to call. The latest version 1.0.5 has this issue fixed. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-danthedeckiedanthedeckieRed Hat, Inc.
Product-simpleevalsimpleevalRed Hat OpenShift AI 2.25Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-915
Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-31898
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 27.62%
||
7 Day CHG+0.08%
Published-18 Mar, 2026 | 03:03
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
jsPDF has a PDF Object Injection via FreeText color

jsPDF is a library to generate PDFs in JavaScript. Prior to version 4.2.1, user control of arguments of the `createAnnotation` method allows users to inject arbitrary PDF objects, such as JavaScript actions. If given the possibility to pass unsanitized input to the following method, a user can inject arbitrary PDF objects, such as JavaScript actions, which might trigger when the PDF is opened or interacted with the `createAnnotation`: `color` parameter. The vulnerability has been fixed in jsPDF@4.2.1. As a workaround, sanitize user input before passing it to the vulnerable API members.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-parallparallaxRed Hat, Inc.
Product-jspdfjsPDFRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.8Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9
CWE ID-CWE-116
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-32304
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.57% / 43.05%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-12 Mar, 2026 | 21:24
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Locutus: RCE via unsanitized input in create_function()

Locutus brings stdlibs of other programming languages to JavaScript for educational purposes. Prior to 3.0.14, the create_function(args, code) function passes both parameters directly to the Function constructor without any sanitization, allowing arbitrary code execution. This is distinct from CVE-2026-29091 which was call_user_func_array using eval() in v2.x. This finding affects create_function using new Function() in v3.x. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.0.14.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-locutuslocutusjsRed Hat, Inc.
Product-locutuslocutusLogging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-88
Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-31230
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.55% / 42.16%
||
7 Day CHG+0.06%
Published-12 May, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 03:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART) thru 1.20.1 contains a command-line argument injection vulnerability in its Kubeflow component (robustness_evaluation_fgsm_pytorch.py). The script uses the unsafe eval() function to parse string values provided via the --clip_values and --input_shape command-line arguments. This allows an attacker to inject arbitrary Python code into these arguments, which will be executed when eval() is called. The vulnerability can be exploited remotely if an attacker can control these arguments (e.g., through pipeline configuration or automated scripts), leading to arbitrary code execution on the system running the ART evaluation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-n/aRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-88
Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-31228
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.61% / 44.85%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-12 May, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART) thru 1.20.1 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in its Kubeflow component. The robustness evaluation function for PyTorch models uses the unsafe eval() function to dynamically evaluate user-supplied strings for the LossFn and Optimizer parameters without any sanitization or security restrictions. An attacker can exploit this by providing a specially crafted string that contains arbitrary Python code, which will be executed when eval() is called, leading to complete compromise of the system running the ART evaluation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-n/aRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2019-14867
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-6.33% / 92.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Nov, 2019 | 08:05
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in IPA, all 4.6.x versions before 4.6.7, all 4.7.x versions before 4.7.4 and all 4.8.x versions before 4.8.3, in the way the internal function ber_scanf() was used in some components of the IPA server, which parsed kerberos key data. An unauthenticated attacker who could trigger parsing of the krb principal key could cause the IPA server to crash or in some conditions, cause arbitrary code to be executed on the server hosting the IPA server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-freeipaRed Hat, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-freeipafedoraipa
CWE ID-CWE-400
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE-2026-29091
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.79% / 51.64%
||
7 Day CHG+0.16%
Published-06 Mar, 2026 | 17:48
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Locutus: Remote Code Execution (RCE) in locutus call_user_func_array due to Code Injection

Locutus brings stdlibs of other programming languages to JavaScript for educational purposes. Prior to version 3.0.0, a remote code execution (RCE) flaw was discovered in the locutus project, specifically within the call_user_func_array function implementation. The vulnerability allows an attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript code into the application's runtime environment. This issue stems from an insecure implementation of the call_user_func_array function (and its wrapper call_user_func), which fails to properly validate all components of a callback array before passing them to eval(). This issue has been patched in version 3.0.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-locutuslocutusjsRed Hat, Inc.
Product-locutuslocutusLogging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-95
Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
CVE-2026-27876
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Grafana Labs
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Grafana Labs
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.93% / 77.52%
||
7 Day CHG+0.65%
Published-27 Mar, 2026 | 14:24
Updated-30 Jun, 2026 | 12:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
RCE on Grafana via sqlExpressions

A chained attack via SQL Expressions and a Grafana Enterprise plugin can lead to a remote arbitrary code execution impact (RCE). This is enabled by a feature in Grafana (OSS), so all users are always recommended to update to avoid future attack vectors going this path. Only instances with the sqlExpressions feature toggle enabled are vulnerable. Only instances in the following version ranges are affected: - 11.6.0 (inclusive) to 11.6.14 (exclusive): 11.6.14 has the fix. 11.5 and below are not affected. - 12.0.0 (inclusive) to 12.1.10 (exclusive): 12.1.10 has the fix. 12.0 did not receive an update, as it is end-of-life. - 12.2.0 (inclusive) to 12.2.8 (exclusive): 12.2.8 has the fix. - 12.3.0 (inclusive) to 12.3.6 (exclusive): 12.3.6 has the fix. - 12.4.0 (inclusive) to 12.4.2 (exclusive): 12.4.2 has the fix. 13.0.0 and above also have the fix: no v13 release is affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Grafana Labs
Product-grafanaGrafanaRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
CWE ID-CWE-89
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-94
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found