Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2026-67293

Summary
Assigner-VulnCheck
Assigner Org ID-83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10
Published At-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated At-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Rejected At-
Credits

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Improper Certificate Hostname Validation

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions <= 3.28.0) contains an improper certificate hostname validation vulnerability. The TLS hostname matcher (tls_match_hostname() in libfreerdp/crypto/tls.c) treats a wildcard pattern such as *.example.com as matching any hostname ending in .example.com, so it incorrectly accepts a wildcard certificate for multi-label subdomains like a.b.example.com (which OpenSSL's X509_check_host() rejects). This weakens TLS server authentication under wildcard-certificate conditions.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:VulnCheck
Assigner Org ID:83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10
Published At:01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated At:01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Improper Certificate Hostname Validation

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions <= 3.28.0) contains an improper certificate hostname validation vulnerability. The TLS hostname matcher (tls_match_hostname() in libfreerdp/crypto/tls.c) treats a wildcard pattern such as *.example.com as matching any hostname ending in .example.com, so it incorrectly accepts a wildcard certificate for multi-label subdomains like a.b.example.com (which OpenSSL's X509_check_host() rejects). This weakens TLS server authentication under wildcard-certificate conditions.

Affected Products
Vendor
FreeRDPFreeRDP
Product
FreeRDP
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 3.29.0 (semver)
Unaffected
  • 3.29.0 (semver)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-295Improper Certificate Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-295
Description: Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
4.09.3CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
3.14.2MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Version: 4.0
Base score: 9.3
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 4.2
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

reporter
1121984919
Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-5wr6-8m8j-3h7f
vendor-advisory
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/f3b4347105114fe7453828736bea069999af319f
patch
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freerdp-before-improper-certificate-hostname-validation
third-party-advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-5wr6-8m8j-3h7f
Resource:
vendor-advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/f3b4347105114fe7453828736bea069999af319f
Resource:
patch
Hyperlink: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freerdp-before-improper-certificate-hostname-validation
Resource:
third-party-advisory
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:disclosure@vulncheck.com
Published At:01 Aug, 2026 | 13:16
Updated At:01 Aug, 2026 | 13:16

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions <= 3.28.0) contains an improper certificate hostname validation vulnerability. The TLS hostname matcher (tls_match_hostname() in libfreerdp/crypto/tls.c) treats a wildcard pattern such as *.example.com as matching any hostname ending in .example.com, so it incorrectly accepts a wildcard certificate for multi-label subdomains like a.b.example.com (which OpenSSL's X509_check_host() rejects). This weakens TLS server authentication under wildcard-certificate conditions.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary4.09.3CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Primary3.14.2MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 4.0
Base score: 9.3
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 4.2
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
CPE Matches

Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarydisclosure@vulncheck.com
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: disclosure@vulncheck.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/f3b4347105114fe7453828736bea069999af319fdisclosure@vulncheck.com
N/A
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-5wr6-8m8j-3h7fdisclosure@vulncheck.com
N/A
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freerdp-before-improper-certificate-hostname-validationdisclosure@vulncheck.com
N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/f3b4347105114fe7453828736bea069999af319f
Source: disclosure@vulncheck.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-5wr6-8m8j-3h7f
Source: disclosure@vulncheck.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freerdp-before-improper-certificate-hostname-validation
Source: disclosure@vulncheck.com
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

19Records found

CVE-2026-66402
Matching Score-10
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-Not Assigned
Published-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated-01 Aug, 2026 | 13:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 TLS Certificate Identity Validation Bypass

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions <= 3.28.0) contains multiple TLS certificate identity validation weaknesses in tls_verify_certificate(), tls_match_hostname(), and x509_utils_get_dns_names(). Because FreeRDP performs custom Common Name and DNS SAN string matching instead of using OpenSSL's length-aware identity validation APIs, it (1) truncates DNS SAN values at embedded NUL bytes (accepting e.g. 'victim.example\0.attacker.example' as 'victim.example'), (2) accepts a matching Common Name even when non-matching DNS SAN entries are present, and (3) accepts IP-literal targets via DNS/CN matching without comparing iPAddress SANs. Under a trusted or misissued certificate chain, an attacker positioned to present such a certificate can bypass server identity verification, weakening TLS server authentication.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-FreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-67294
Matching Score-10
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-Not Assigned
Published-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated-01 Aug, 2026 | 13:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 TLS Certificate EKU Bypass

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 improperly validates the Extended Key Usage (EKU) purpose of the peer certificate during client-side server TLS authentication. In x509_utils_verify(), when server-purpose (X509_PURPOSE_SSL_SERVER) verification fails, the code falls back to client-purpose and any-purpose verification, so a trusted, hostname-matching certificate valid only for clientAuth can be accepted as the RDP server certificate. In environments relying on EKU separation between client and server certificates, this allows a clientAuth-only certificate issued by a trusted CA to bypass server certificate purpose validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-FreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-67289
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-Not Assigned
Published-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated-01 Aug, 2026 | 13:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 HTTP Proxy Request Injection via Redirection

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions <= 3.28.0) does not validate CRLF and control characters in the server-controlled RDP redirection TargetNetAddress field. This value is copied into the client's ServerHostname and, when the client connects through an HTTP proxy, is written directly into the proxy CONNECT request line and Host header by http_proxy_connect() without filtering. A malicious or compromised RDP server can send a crafted redirection PDU containing embedded control characters to inject arbitrary headers/requests into the HTTP proxy CONNECT request.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-FreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-113
Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting')
CVE-2026-67292
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-Not Assigned
Published-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated-01 Aug, 2026 | 13:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 WebSocket Ping Buffer Over-disclosure

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 contains a buffer over-disclosure vulnerability in the gateway WebSocket transport (libfreerdp/core/gateway/websocket.c). The client's Pong reply reuses a fixed 1024-byte response stream whose length is not sealed to the actual received Ping payload, so a malicious gateway/WebSocket peer sending a non-empty Ping control frame causes the client to reply with an overlong Pong that discloses bytes beyond the received payload (the peer receives the masking key and can unmask the reply). A zero-length Ping reaches an assertion and terminates the client (denial of service).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-FreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-130
Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency
CVE-2026-64621
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.30% / 22.74%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-20 Jul, 2026 | 12:04
Updated-28 Jul, 2026 | 15:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP before 3.28.0 Double-Free via selectedmonitors

FreeRDP before 3.28.0 (affected 3.x through 3.27.1) contains a double-free vulnerability in freerdp_client_rdp_file_apply_to_settings() (client/common/file.c) when parsing the selectedmonitors field of a .rdp connection file. The MonitorIds array is allocated through the settings object, and a raw non-owning pointer to it is freed on the strtoul error path without clearing settings->MonitorIds, leaving it dangling; at teardown freerdp_settings_free() frees the same buffer again. An attacker who convinces a victim to open a crafted .rdp file with oversized monitor tokens can trigger a size-controlled double-free in any FreeRDP CLI client (xfreerdp/sdl-freerdp/wlfreerdp) in the default configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-freerdpFreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-415
Double Free
CVE-2026-64620
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.85% / 54.62%
||
7 Day CHG+0.27%
Published-20 Jul, 2026 | 12:04
Updated-28 Jul, 2026 | 15:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP before 3.28.0 Heap Buffer Overflow via crypto_rsa_common

FreeRDP before 3.28.0 (affected <=3.27.1) contains a heap-based buffer overflow in crypto_rsa_common() (libfreerdp/crypto/crypto.c). The function writes the modular-exponentiation result into the caller's output buffer via BN_bn2bin() and only afterward checks output_length > out_length, so out-of-bounds bytes are written before the bounds check. On the server side, when a client selects RDP Standard Security, the encrypted client random is decrypted into a fixed 32-byte buffer. Because the server publishes its RSA public key, an unauthenticated attacker can forge a ciphertext whose decrypted value is up to the full modulus length (e.g. 256 bytes for RSA-2048), overflowing the 32-byte heap buffer by up to ~224 attacker-controlled bytes pre-authentication, resulting in denial of service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-freerdpFreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-122
Heap-based Buffer Overflow
CVE-2026-31806
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.66% / 47.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Mar, 2026 | 17:40
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP has a Heap Buffer Overflow in nsc_process_message() via Unchecked SURFACE_BITS_COMMAND Bitmap Dimensions

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.24.0, the gdi_surface_bits() function processes SURFACE_BITS_COMMAND messages sent by the RDP server. When the command is handled using NSCodec, the bmp.width and bmp.height values provided by the server are not properly validated against the actual desktop dimensions. A malicious RDP server can supply crafted bmp.width and bmp.height values that exceed the expected surface size. Because these values are used during bitmap decoding and memory operations without proper bounds checking, this can lead to a heap buffer overflow. Since the attacker can also control the associated pixel data transmitted by the server, the overflow may be exploitable to overwrite adjacent heap memory. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.24.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.FreeRDP
Product-freerdpFreeRDPRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update ServiceRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-OnRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update ServiceRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support
CWE ID-CWE-122
Heap-based Buffer Overflow
CWE ID-CWE-131
Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size
CVE-2026-40254
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.20% / 10.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2026 | 02:24
Updated-27 Apr, 2026 | 17:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP: contains_dotdot() off-by-one allows drive channel path traversal via terminal ..

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Versions prior to 3.25.0 have an off-by-one in the path traversal filter in `channels/drive/client/drive_file.c`. The `contains_dotdot()` function catches `../` and `..\` mid-path but misses `..` when it's the last component with no trailing separator. A rogue RDP server can read, list, or write files one directory above the client's shared folder through RDPDR requests. This requires the victim to connect with drive redirection enabled. Version 3.25.0 patches the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-freerdpFreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-193
Off-by-one Error
CVE-2017-2836
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.95% / 57.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2018 | 19:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An exploitable denial of service vulnerability exists within the reading of proprietary server certificates in FreeRDP 2.0.0-beta1+android11. A specially crafted challenge packet can cause the program termination leading to a denial of service condition. An attacker can compromise the server or use man in the middle to trigger this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDPDebian GNU/Linux
Product-freerdpdebian_linuxFreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-7924
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MongoDB, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MongoDB, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.69% / 49.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Apr, 2021 | 16:25
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Specific command line parameter might result in accepting invalid certificate

Usage of specific command line parameter in MongoDB Tools which was originally intended to just skip hostname checks, may result in MongoDB skipping all certificate validation. This may result in accepting invalid certificates.This issue affects: MongoDB Inc. MongoDB Database Tools 3.6 versions later than 3.6.5; 3.6 versions prior to 3.6.21; 4.0 versions prior to 4.0.21; 4.2 versions prior to 4.2.11; 100 versions prior to 100.2.0. MongoDB Inc. Mongomirror 0 versions later than 0.6.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-MongoDB, Inc.
Product-database_toolsmongomirrorMongoDB Database ToolsMongomirror
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-28162
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-4.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 26.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Mar, 2024 | 17:02
Updated-07 May, 2025 | 14:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Jenkins Delphix Plugin 3.0.1 through 3.1.0 (both inclusive) a global option for administrators to enable or disable SSL/TLS certificate validation for Data Control Tower (DCT) connections fails to take effect until Jenkins is restarted when switching from disabled validation to enabled validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-delphixJenkins Delphix Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-34199
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.51% / 40.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Sep, 2025 | 18:48
Updated-15 May, 2026 | 11:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Insecure SSL Verification Allows Man-in-the-Middle Attacks

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host versions prior to 22.0.1049 and Application versions prior to 20.0.2786 (VA and SaaS deployments) contain insecure defaults and code patterns that disable TLS/SSL certificate verification for communications to printers and internal microservices. In multiple places, the application sets libcurl/PHP transport options such that CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST and CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER are effectively disabled, and environment variables (for example API_*_VERIFYSSL=false) are used to turn off verification for gateway and microservice endpoints. As a result, the client accepts TLS connections without validating server certificates (and, in some cases, uses clear-text HTTP), permitting on-path attackers to perform man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. An attacker able to intercept network traffic between the product and printers or microservices can eavesdrop on and modify sensitive data (including print jobs, configuration, and authentication tokens), inject malicious payloads, or disrupt service. This vulnerability has been identified by the vendor as: V-2024-024 — Insecure Communication to Printers & Microservices.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vasionVasion
Product-virtual_appliance_hostvirtual_appliance_applicationPrint Virtual Appliance HostPrint Application
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-50302
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-4.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 14.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jul, 2026 | 17:06
Updated-30 Jul, 2026 | 20:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Cryptographic Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Improper certificate validation in Windows Cryptographic Services allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_11_24h2windows_10_22h2windows_server_2022windows_10_21h2windows_server_2025windows_11_25h2windows_11_26h1Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows Server 2025Windows Server 2022Windows 11 Version 25H2Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 26H1
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-13990
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.57% / 44.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Sep, 2025 | 18:54
Updated-19 Nov, 2025 | 15:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
MicroWorld eScan AV Insecure Update Mechanism Allows Man-in-the-Middle Replacement of Updates

MicroWorld eScan AV's update mechanism failed to ensure authenticity and integrity of updates: update packages were delivered and accepted without robust cryptographic verification. As a result, an on-path attacker could perform a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack and substitute malicious update payloads for legitimate ones. The eScan AV client accepted these substituted packages and executed or loaded their components (including sideloaded DLLs and Java/installer payloads), enabling remote code execution on affected systems. MicroWorld eScan confirmed remediation of the update mechanism on 2023-07-31 but versioning details are unavailable. NOTE: MicroWorld eScan disputes the characterization in third-party reports, stating the issue relates to 2018–2019 and that controls were implemented then.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-MicroWorld Technologies
Product-eScan AV
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2026-34580
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.25% / 16.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Apr, 2026 | 21:12
Updated-24 Jul, 2026 | 22:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Botan has a certificate authentication bypass due to trust anchor confusion

Botan is a C++ cryptography library. In 3.11.0, the function Certificate_Store::certificate_known had a misleading name; it would return true if any certificate in the store had a DN (and subject key identifier, if set) matching that of the argument. It did not check that the cert it found and the cert it was passed were actually the same certificate. In 3.11.0 an extension of path validation logic was made which assumed that certificate_known only returned true if the certificates were in fact identical. The impact is that if an end entity certificate is presented, and its DN (and subject key identifier, if set) match that of any trusted root, the end entity certificate is accepted immediately as if it itself were a trusted root. , This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-botan_projectrandombitRed Hat, Inc.
Product-botanbotanRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-19946
Matching Score-4
Assigner-QNAP Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-QNAP Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.32% / 23.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Sep, 2020 | 14:14
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 11:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The vulnerability have been reported to affect earlier versions of Helpdesk. If exploited, this improper certificate validation vulnerability could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the host and client. QNAP has already fixed the issue in Helpdesk 3.0.3 and later.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-QNAP Systems, Inc.
Product-helpdeskHelpdesk
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CVE-2023-31151
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.7||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 15.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 May, 2023 | 19:21
Updated-24 Jan, 2025 | 19:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation

An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories Real-Time Automation Controller (SEL RTAC) Web Interface could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack. See SEL Service Bulletin dated 2022-11-15 for more details.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. (SEL)
Product-sel-3505_firmwaresel-3505-3_firmwaresel-3560e_firmwaresel-2241_rtac_modulesel-3530_firmwaresel-2241_rtac_module_firmwaresel-3555sel-3560s_firmwaresel-3555_firmwaresel-3505-3sel-3532_firmwaresel-3560esel-3505sel-3350sel-3530-4sel-3530-4_firmwaresel-3560ssel-3350_firmwaresel-3532sel-3530SEL-3560ESEL-3350SEL-3505SEL-3532SEL-3505-3SEL-2241 RTAC moduleSEL-3530SEL-3555SEL-3560SSEL-3530-4
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-15719
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-2.51% / 83.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jul, 2020 | 13:47
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libldap in certain third-party OpenLDAP packages has a certificate-validation flaw when the third-party package is asserting RFC6125 support. It considers CN even when there is a non-matching subjectAltName (SAN). This is fixed in, for example, openldap-2.4.46-10.el8 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openldapn/aMcAfee, LLCRed Hat, Inc.openSUSEOracle Corporation
Product-blockchain_platformpolicy_auditorenterprise_linuxopenldapleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-23546
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-4.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.56% / 43.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2023 | 14:53
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 10:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A misconfiguration vulnerability exists in the urvpn_client functionality of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5. A specially-crafted man-in-the-middle attack can lead to increased privileges. An attacker can perform a man-in-the-middle attack to trigger this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Milesight
Product-ur32l_firmwareur32lUR32L
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
Details not found