Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2026-67294

Summary
Assigner-VulnCheck
Assigner Org ID-83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10
Published At-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated At-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Rejected At-
Credits

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 TLS Certificate EKU Bypass

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 improperly validates the Extended Key Usage (EKU) purpose of the peer certificate during client-side server TLS authentication. In x509_utils_verify(), when server-purpose (X509_PURPOSE_SSL_SERVER) verification fails, the code falls back to client-purpose and any-purpose verification, so a trusted, hostname-matching certificate valid only for clientAuth can be accepted as the RDP server certificate. In environments relying on EKU separation between client and server certificates, this allows a clientAuth-only certificate issued by a trusted CA to bypass server certificate purpose validation.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:VulnCheck
Assigner Org ID:83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10
Published At:01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated At:01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 TLS Certificate EKU Bypass

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 improperly validates the Extended Key Usage (EKU) purpose of the peer certificate during client-side server TLS authentication. In x509_utils_verify(), when server-purpose (X509_PURPOSE_SSL_SERVER) verification fails, the code falls back to client-purpose and any-purpose verification, so a trusted, hostname-matching certificate valid only for clientAuth can be accepted as the RDP server certificate. In environments relying on EKU separation between client and server certificates, this allows a clientAuth-only certificate issued by a trusted CA to bypass server certificate purpose validation.

Affected Products
Vendor
FreeRDPFreeRDP
Product
FreeRDP
Default Status
unaffected
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 before 3.29.0 (semver)
Unaffected
  • 3.29.0 (semver)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-295Improper Certificate Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-295
Description: Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
4.09.3CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
3.15.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Version: 4.0
Base score: 9.3
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

reporter
1121984919
Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-89c6-jjrw-96h4
vendor-advisory
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/f3b4347105114fe7453828736bea069999af319f
patch
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freerdp-before-tls-certificate-eku-bypass
third-party-advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-89c6-jjrw-96h4
Resource:
vendor-advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/f3b4347105114fe7453828736bea069999af319f
Resource:
patch
Hyperlink: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freerdp-before-tls-certificate-eku-bypass
Resource:
third-party-advisory
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:disclosure@vulncheck.com
Published At:01 Aug, 2026 | 13:16
Updated At:01 Aug, 2026 | 13:16

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 improperly validates the Extended Key Usage (EKU) purpose of the peer certificate during client-side server TLS authentication. In x509_utils_verify(), when server-purpose (X509_PURPOSE_SSL_SERVER) verification fails, the code falls back to client-purpose and any-purpose verification, so a trusted, hostname-matching certificate valid only for clientAuth can be accepted as the RDP server certificate. In environments relying on EKU separation between client and server certificates, this allows a clientAuth-only certificate issued by a trusted CA to bypass server certificate purpose validation.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary4.09.3CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Primary3.15.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 4.0
Base score: 9.3
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CPE Matches

Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarydisclosure@vulncheck.com
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: disclosure@vulncheck.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/f3b4347105114fe7453828736bea069999af319fdisclosure@vulncheck.com
N/A
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-89c6-jjrw-96h4disclosure@vulncheck.com
N/A
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freerdp-before-tls-certificate-eku-bypassdisclosure@vulncheck.com
N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/f3b4347105114fe7453828736bea069999af319f
Source: disclosure@vulncheck.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-89c6-jjrw-96h4
Source: disclosure@vulncheck.com
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freerdp-before-tls-certificate-eku-bypass
Source: disclosure@vulncheck.com
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

131Records found

CVE-2026-66402
Matching Score-10
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-Not Assigned
Published-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated-01 Aug, 2026 | 13:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 TLS Certificate Identity Validation Bypass

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions <= 3.28.0) contains multiple TLS certificate identity validation weaknesses in tls_verify_certificate(), tls_match_hostname(), and x509_utils_get_dns_names(). Because FreeRDP performs custom Common Name and DNS SAN string matching instead of using OpenSSL's length-aware identity validation APIs, it (1) truncates DNS SAN values at embedded NUL bytes (accepting e.g. 'victim.example\0.attacker.example' as 'victim.example'), (2) accepts a matching Common Name even when non-matching DNS SAN entries are present, and (3) accepts IP-literal targets via DNS/CN matching without comparing iPAddress SANs. Under a trusted or misissued certificate chain, an attacker positioned to present such a certificate can bypass server identity verification, weakening TLS server authentication.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-FreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-67293
Matching Score-10
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-Not Assigned
Published-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated-01 Aug, 2026 | 13:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Improper Certificate Hostname Validation

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions <= 3.28.0) contains an improper certificate hostname validation vulnerability. The TLS hostname matcher (tls_match_hostname() in libfreerdp/crypto/tls.c) treats a wildcard pattern such as *.example.com as matching any hostname ending in .example.com, so it incorrectly accepts a wildcard certificate for multi-label subdomains like a.b.example.com (which OpenSSL's X509_check_host() rejects). This weakens TLS server authentication under wildcard-certificate conditions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-FreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-67289
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-Not Assigned
Published-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated-01 Aug, 2026 | 13:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 HTTP Proxy Request Injection via Redirection

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions <= 3.28.0) does not validate CRLF and control characters in the server-controlled RDP redirection TargetNetAddress field. This value is copied into the client's ServerHostname and, when the client connects through an HTTP proxy, is written directly into the proxy CONNECT request line and Host header by http_proxy_connect() without filtering. A malicious or compromised RDP server can send a crafted redirection PDU containing embedded control characters to inject arbitrary headers/requests into the HTTP proxy CONNECT request.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-FreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-113
Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting')
CVE-2026-67292
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-Not Assigned
Published-01 Aug, 2026 | 12:22
Updated-01 Aug, 2026 | 13:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 WebSocket Ping Buffer Over-disclosure

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 contains a buffer over-disclosure vulnerability in the gateway WebSocket transport (libfreerdp/core/gateway/websocket.c). The client's Pong reply reuses a fixed 1024-byte response stream whose length is not sealed to the actual received Ping payload, so a malicious gateway/WebSocket peer sending a non-empty Ping control frame causes the client to reply with an overlong Pong that discloses bytes beyond the received payload (the peer receives the masking key and can unmask the reply). A zero-length Ping reaches an assertion and terminates the client (denial of service).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-FreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-130
Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency
CVE-2026-64621
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.30% / 22.74%
||
7 Day CHG+0.07%
Published-20 Jul, 2026 | 12:04
Updated-28 Jul, 2026 | 15:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP before 3.28.0 Double-Free via selectedmonitors

FreeRDP before 3.28.0 (affected 3.x through 3.27.1) contains a double-free vulnerability in freerdp_client_rdp_file_apply_to_settings() (client/common/file.c) when parsing the selectedmonitors field of a .rdp connection file. The MonitorIds array is allocated through the settings object, and a raw non-owning pointer to it is freed on the strtoul error path without clearing settings->MonitorIds, leaving it dangling; at teardown freerdp_settings_free() frees the same buffer again. An attacker who convinces a victim to open a crafted .rdp file with oversized monitor tokens can trigger a size-controlled double-free in any FreeRDP CLI client (xfreerdp/sdl-freerdp/wlfreerdp) in the default configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-freerdpFreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-415
Double Free
CVE-2026-64620
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.85% / 54.62%
||
7 Day CHG+0.27%
Published-20 Jul, 2026 | 12:04
Updated-28 Jul, 2026 | 15:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP before 3.28.0 Heap Buffer Overflow via crypto_rsa_common

FreeRDP before 3.28.0 (affected <=3.27.1) contains a heap-based buffer overflow in crypto_rsa_common() (libfreerdp/crypto/crypto.c). The function writes the modular-exponentiation result into the caller's output buffer via BN_bn2bin() and only afterward checks output_length > out_length, so out-of-bounds bytes are written before the bounds check. On the server side, when a client selects RDP Standard Security, the encrypted client random is decrypted into a fixed 32-byte buffer. Because the server publishes its RSA public key, an unauthenticated attacker can forge a ciphertext whose decrypted value is up to the full modulus length (e.g. 256 bytes for RSA-2048), overflowing the 32-byte heap buffer by up to ~224 attacker-controlled bytes pre-authentication, resulting in denial of service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDP
Product-freerdpFreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-122
Heap-based Buffer Overflow
CVE-2026-31806
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.66% / 47.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Mar, 2026 | 17:40
Updated-15 Jul, 2026 | 02:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP has a Heap Buffer Overflow in nsc_process_message() via Unchecked SURFACE_BITS_COMMAND Bitmap Dimensions

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.24.0, the gdi_surface_bits() function processes SURFACE_BITS_COMMAND messages sent by the RDP server. When the command is handled using NSCodec, the bmp.width and bmp.height values provided by the server are not properly validated against the actual desktop dimensions. A malicious RDP server can supply crafted bmp.width and bmp.height values that exceed the expected surface size. Because these values are used during bitmap decoding and memory operations without proper bounds checking, this can lead to a heap buffer overflow. Since the attacker can also control the associated pixel data transmitted by the server, the overflow may be exploitable to overwrite adjacent heap memory. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.24.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.FreeRDP
Product-freerdpFreeRDPRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update ServiceRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-OnRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update ServiceRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support
CWE ID-CWE-122
Heap-based Buffer Overflow
CWE ID-CWE-131
Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size
CVE-2022-39283
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.03% / 60.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Nov, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
FreeRDP may read and display out of bounds data

FreeRDP is a free remote desktop protocol library and clients. All FreeRDP based clients when using the `/video` command line switch might read uninitialized data, decode it as audio/video and display the result. FreeRDP based server implementations are not affected. This issue has been patched in version 2.8.1. If you cannot upgrade do not use the `/video` switch.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDPFedora Project
Product-fedorafreerdpFreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CWE ID-CWE-908
Use of Uninitialized Resource
CVE-2017-2836
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.95% / 57.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2018 | 19:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An exploitable denial of service vulnerability exists within the reading of proprietary server certificates in FreeRDP 2.0.0-beta1+android11. A specially crafted challenge packet can cause the program termination leading to a denial of service condition. An attacker can compromise the server or use man in the middle to trigger this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-FreeRDPDebian GNU/Linux
Product-freerdpdebian_linuxFreeRDP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-42017
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.47% / 38.37%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-08 Mar, 2022 | 11:31
Updated-12 Aug, 2025 | 12:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100F, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200F, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969F, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400F, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416F, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PF, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900F, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GF, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPF, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GF, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488F, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. A new variant of the POODLE attack has left a third-party component vulnerable due to the implementation flaws of the CBC encryption mode in TLS 1.0 to 1.2. If an attacker were to exploit this, they could act as a man-in-the-middle and eavesdrop on encrypted communications.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-ruggedcom_rs969ruggedcom_rs910ruggedcom_rsg2100ruggedcom_rsg2300pruggedcom_rs930lruggedcom_rsg907rruggedcom_rsg910cruggedcom_rs416ruggedcom_rs900wruggedcom_i801ruggedcom_rosruggedcom_m2100ruggedcom_rmcruggedcom_i800ruggedcom_rst2228ruggedcom_rs930wruggedcom_rmc8388ruggedcom_rsg2200ruggedcom_rs900ruggedcom_rs401ruggedcom_rs8000truggedcom_rsg909rruggedcom_rp110ruggedcom_rs910lruggedcom_i802ruggedcom_m969ruggedcom_rs910wruggedcom_rsg2100pruggedcom_rs8000ruggedcom_rst916pruggedcom_rs900gpruggedcom_rs900lruggedcom_rmc40ruggedcom_rsl910ruggedcom_rmc41ruggedcom_rsg920pruggedcom_rs920wruggedcom_rs416v2ruggedcom_rs8000aruggedcom_rsg2300ruggedcom_rst916cruggedcom_m2200ruggedcom_rs400ruggedcom_rst2228pruggedcom_rmc20ruggedcom_rs8000hruggedcom_rsg908cruggedcom_i803ruggedcom_rsg2488ruggedcom_rs900gruggedcom_rsg2288ruggedcom_rs920lruggedcom_rs940gruggedcom_rmc30RUGGEDCOM RS8000RUGGEDCOM RS900LRUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS930WRUGGEDCOM RS910LRUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600RUGGEDCOM RS920WRUGGEDCOM RS940GRUGGEDCOM RS900FRUGGEDCOM M2200RUGGEDCOM RS910RUGGEDCOM RSG908CRUGGEDCOM RS900RUGGEDCOM RS400FRUGGEDCOM RS920LRUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100RUGGEDCOM RS8000HRUGGEDCOM RS400RUGGEDCOM RS8000TRUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM M969RUGGEDCOM RS416PFRUGGEDCOM RS900GRUGGEDCOM M2100FRUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XXRUGGEDCOM RS900WRUGGEDCOM RS8000ARUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.XRUGGEDCOM i803RUGGEDCOM RSG910CRUGGEDCOM RSG2300PFRUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2488FRUGGEDCOM RS969RUGGEDCOM RSG2200RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG909RRUGGEDCOM RS416RUGGEDCOM RS416FRUGGEDCOM RS900GPFRUGGEDCOM RST2228PRUGGEDCOM RSG2100PRUGGEDCOM i800RUGGEDCOM RS416PRUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XXRUGGEDCOM RST916PRUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600FRUGGEDCOM RSL910RUGGEDCOM RSG907RRUGGEDCOM RS930LRUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS910WRUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100PFRUGGEDCOM RS900GPRUGGEDCOM RST916CRUGGEDCOM RSG2100FRUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.XRUGGEDCOM i802RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS940GFRUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RST2228RUGGEDCOM RS401RUGGEDCOM RMC30RUGGEDCOM RS900GFRUGGEDCOM M2100RUGGEDCOM RSG2300FRUGGEDCOM RS1600TRUGGEDCOM M969FRUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM M2200FRUGGEDCOM RP110RUGGEDCOM RSG2200FRUGGEDCOM i801RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-358
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
CVE-2025-68482
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 8.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Mar, 2026 | 16:44
Updated-12 Mar, 2026 | 20:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A improper certificate validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 6.4 all versions, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager 7.0 all versions, FortiManager 6.4 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to view confidential information via a man in the middle [MiTM] attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortimanagerfortianalyzerFortiManagerFortiAnalyzerFortiManager CloudFortiAnalyzer Cloud
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-66491
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 11.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Dec, 2025 | 00:38
Updated-02 Jan, 2026 | 21:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Traefik has Inverted TLS Verification Logic in its ingress-nginx Provider

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Versions 3.5.0 through 3.6.2 have inverted TLS verification logic in the nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/proxy-ssl-verify annotation. Setting the annotation to "on" (intending to enable backend TLS certificate verification) actually disables verification, allowing man-in-the-middle attacks against HTTPS backends when operators believe they are protected. This issue is fixed in version 3.6.3.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-traefiktraefik
Product-traefiktraefik
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-40713
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.05% / 60.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2021 | 15:43
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Adobe Experience Manager Improper Certificate Validation Could Lead to Man In The Middle Attack

Adobe Experience Manager version 6.5.9.0 (and earlier) is affected by a improper certificate validation vulnerability in the cold storage component. If an attacker can achieve a man in the middle when the cold server establishes a new certificate, they would be able to harvest sensitive information.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Adobe Inc.
Product-experience_managerExperience Manager
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-39358
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.71% / 49.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2021 | 18:47
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In GNOME libgfbgraph through 0.2.4, gfbgraph-photo.c does not enable TLS certificate verification on the SoupSessionSync objects it creates, leaving users vulnerable to network MITM attacks. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2016-20011.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME ProjectFedora Project
Product-libgfbgraphfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-39365
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.87% / 55.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2021 | 21:18
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In GNOME grilo though 0.3.13, grl-net-wc.c does not enable TLS certificate verification on the SoupSessionAsync objects it creates, leaving users vulnerable to network MITM attacks. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2016-20011.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME ProjectDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxgrilon/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-39360
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.74% / 51.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2021 | 18:46
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In GNOME libzapojit through 0.0.3, zpj-skydrive.c does not enable TLS certificate verification on the SoupSessionSync objects it creates, leaving users vulnerable to network MITM attacks. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2016-20011.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME ProjectFedora Project
Product-fedoralibzapojitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-15526
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.50% / 40.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jul, 2020 | 16:40
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Redgate SQL Monitor 7.1.4 through 10.1.6 (inclusive), the scope for disabling some TLS security certificate checks can extend beyond that defined by various options on the Configuration > Notifications pages to disable certificate checking for alert notifications. These TLS security checks are also ignored during monitoring of VMware machines. This would make SQL Monitor vulnerable to potential man-in-the-middle attacks when sending alert notification emails, posting to Slack or posting to webhooks. The vulnerability is fixed in version 10.1.7.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-red-gaten/a
Product-sql_monitorn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-22367
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.51% / 40.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Feb, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-21 Mar, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Ichiran App for iOS versions prior to 3.1.0 and Ichiran App for Android versions prior to 3.1.0 improperly verify server certificates, which may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to eavesdrop on an encrypted communication via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ichiranusaBetrend Corporation and ICHIRAN INC.
Product-ichiranIchiran App for iOS and Ichiran App for Android
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-20732
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.49% / 39.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jun, 2021 | 01:05
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The ATOM (ATOM - Smart life App for Android versions prior to 1.8.1 and ATOM - Smart life App for iOS versions prior to 1.8.2) does not verify server certificate properly, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to eavesdrop on encrypted communication via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ATOM (ATOM tech Inc.)
Product-smart_lifeATOM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-15047
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.80% / 52.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Jun, 2020 | 10:49
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

MSA/SMTP.cpp in Trojita before 0.8 ignores certificate-verification errors, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SMTP servers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-trojita_projectn/a
Product-trojitan/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-14980
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.15% / 63.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jun, 2020 | 17:39
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Sophos Secure Email application through 3.9.4 for Android has Missing SSL Certificate Validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSophos Ltd.
Product-sophos_secure_emailn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13254
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-6.09% / 92.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jun, 2020 | 13:11
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxCanonical Ltd.DjangoNetApp, Inc.Oracle CorporationFedora Project
Product-ubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxfedorazfs_storage_appliance_kitdjangosra_pluginsteelstore_cloud_integrated_storagen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13616
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.93% / 57.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2020 | 22:08
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The boost ASIO wrapper in net/asio.cpp in Pichi before 1.3.0 lacks TLS hostname verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pichi_projectn/a
Product-pichin/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13615
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.73% / 50.66%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2020 | 22:08
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

lib/QoreSocket.cpp in Qore before 0.9.4.2 lacks hostname verification for X.509 certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-qoren/a
Product-qoren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-11806
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.49% / 39.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Apr, 2020 | 12:42
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In MailStore Outlook Add-in (and Email Archive Outlook Add-in) through 12.1.2, the login process does not validate the validity of the certificate presented by the server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mailstoren/a
Product-mailstore_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33682
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.62% / 46.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Sep, 2022 | 09:25
Updated-27 May, 2025 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Disabled Hostname Verification makes Brokers, Proxies vulnerable to MITM attack

TLS hostname verification cannot be enabled in the Pulsar Broker's Java Client, the Pulsar Broker's Java Admin Client, the Pulsar WebSocket Proxy's Java Client, and the Pulsar Proxy's Admin Client leaving intra-cluster connections and geo-replication connections vulnerable to man in the middle attacks, which could leak credentials, configuration data, message data, and any other data sent by these clients. The vulnerability is for both the pulsar+ssl protocol and HTTPS. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack by providing the client with a cryptographically valid certificate for an unrelated host. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Broker, Proxy, and WebSocket Proxy versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0; 2.6.4 and earlier.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-5526
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.50% / 39.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Jan, 2020 | 03:35
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The AWMS Mobile App for Android 2.0.0 to 2.0.5 and for iOS 2.0.0 to 2.0.8 does not verify X.509 certificates from servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fujixeroxFuji Xerox Co.,Ltd.
Product-apeosware_management_suiteAWMS Mobile App
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-4496
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.57% / 44.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Dec, 2021 | 18:35
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.8.x server connection to an IBM Spectrum Protect Plus workload agent is subject to a man-in-the-middle attack due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 182046.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM CorporationLinux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-linux_kernelspectrum_protect_plusSpectrum Protect Plus
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-3940
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.80% / 53.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jan, 2020 | 17:59
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 07:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

VMware Workspace ONE SDK and dependent mobile application updates address sensitive information disclosure vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-VMware (Broadcom Inc.)
Product-workspace_one_sdk_\(objective-c\)workspace_one_peopleworkspace_one_boxerworkspace_one_contentworkspace_one_notebookworkspace_one_intelligent_hubworkspace_one_webworkspace_one_piv-d_managerworkspace_one_sdkWorkspace ONE SDK
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-39361
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.56% / 43.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2021 | 18:46
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In GNOME evolution-rss through 0.3.96, network-soup.c does not enable TLS certificate verification on the SoupSessionSync objects it creates, leaving users vulnerable to network MITM attacks. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2016-20011.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME Project
Product-evolution-rssn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-39359
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.10% / 62.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In GNOME libgda through 6.0.0, gda-web-provider.c does not enable TLS certificate verification on the SoupSessionSync objects it creates, leaving users vulnerable to network MITM attacks. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2016-20011.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME ProjectFedora Project
Product-fedoralibgdan/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-54846
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.45% / 37.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jan, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-02 Oct, 2025 | 17:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue in CP Plus CP-VNR-3104 B3223P22C02424 allows attackers to obtain the EC private key and access sensitive data or execute a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCP PLUS (Aditya Group - Aditya Infotech Limited)
Product-cp-vnr-3104cp-vnr-3104_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-4264
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.01% / 59.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 May, 2019 | 15:10
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2.8 WinCollect could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information by spoofing a trusted entity using man in the middle techniques due to not validating or incorrectly validating a certificate. IBM X-Force ID: 160072.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-qradar_security_information_and_event_managerQRadar SIEM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-36005
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 6.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Jul, 2025 | 14:52
Updated-22 Aug, 2025 | 18:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM MQ Operator information disclosure

IBM MQ Operator LTS 2.0.0 through 2.0.29, MQ Operator CD 3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.1.0 through 3.1.3, 3.3.0, 3.4.0, 3.4.1, 3.5.0, 3.5.1, 3.6.0, and MQ Operator SC2 3.2.0 through 3.2.13 Internet Pass-Thru could allow a malicious user to obtain sensitive information from another TLS session connection by the proxy to the same hostname and port due to improper certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-supplied_mq_advanced_container_imagesmq_operatorMQ Operator
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-34199
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.51% / 40.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Sep, 2025 | 18:48
Updated-15 May, 2026 | 11:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Insecure SSL Verification Allows Man-in-the-Middle Attacks

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host versions prior to 22.0.1049 and Application versions prior to 20.0.2786 (VA and SaaS deployments) contain insecure defaults and code patterns that disable TLS/SSL certificate verification for communications to printers and internal microservices. In multiple places, the application sets libcurl/PHP transport options such that CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST and CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER are effectively disabled, and environment variables (for example API_*_VERIFYSSL=false) are used to turn off verification for gateway and microservice endpoints. As a result, the client accepts TLS connections without validating server certificates (and, in some cases, uses clear-text HTTP), permitting on-path attackers to perform man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. An attacker able to intercept network traffic between the product and printers or microservices can eavesdrop on and modify sensitive data (including print jobs, configuration, and authentication tokens), inject malicious payloads, or disrupt service. This vulnerability has been identified by the vendor as: V-2024-024 — Insecure Communication to Printers & Microservices.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vasionVasion
Product-virtual_appliance_hostvirtual_appliance_applicationPrint Virtual Appliance HostPrint Application
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-32407
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 16.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 May, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-12 Jun, 2025 | 16:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Samsung Internet for Galaxy Watch version 5.0.9, available up until Samsung Galaxy Watch 3, does not properly validate TLS certificates, allowing for an attacker to impersonate any and all websites visited by the user. This is a critical misconfiguration in the way the browser validates the identity of the server. It negates the use of HTTPS as a secure channel, allowing for Man-in-the-Middle attacks, stealing sensitive information or modifying incoming and outgoing traffic. NOTE: This vulnerability is in an end-of-life product that is no longer maintained by the vendor.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSamsung
Product-internetn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-33099
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 7.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Sep, 2025 | 14:19
Updated-03 Sep, 2025 | 16:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM Concert Software information disclosure

IBM Concert Software 1.0.0 through 1.1.0 could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions using man in the middle techniques due to improper certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-concertConcert Software
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-2993
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.60% / 88.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Sep, 2012 | 01:00
Updated-29 Apr, 2026 | 01:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Microsoft Windows Phone 7 does not verify the domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof an SSL server for the (1) POP3, (2) IMAP, or (3) SMTP protocol via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMicrosoft Corporation
Product-windows_phone_7_firmwarewindows_phone_7n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-28972
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.09% / 86.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Feb, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In SaltStack Salt before 3002.5, authentication to VMware vcenter, vsphere, and esxi servers (in the vmware.py files) does not always validate the SSL/TLS certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-saltstackn/aDebian GNU/LinuxFedora Project
Product-debian_linuxfedorasaltn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-5538
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VMware by Broadcom
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.65% / 47.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Oct, 2019 | 15:52
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Sensitive information disclosure vulnerability resulting from a lack of certificate validation during the File-Based Backup and Restore operations of VMware vCenter Server Appliance (6.7 before 6.7u3a and 6.5 before 6.5u3d) may allow a malicious actor to intercept sensitive data in transit over SCP. A malicious actor with man-in-the-middle positioning between vCenter Server Appliance and a backup target may be able to intercept sensitive data in transit during File-Based Backup and Restore operations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aVMware (Broadcom Inc.)
Product-vcenter_serverVMware vCenter Server Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-5102
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.78% / 52.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Nov, 2019 | 17:59
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 19:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An exploitable information leak vulnerability exists in the ustream-ssl library of OpenWrt, versions 18.06.4 and 15.05.1. When connecting to a remote server, the server's SSL certificate is checked but no action is taken when the certificate is invalid. An attacker could exploit this behavior by performing a man-in-the-middle attack, providing any certificate, leading to the theft of all the data sent by the client during the first request.An exploitable information leak vulnerability exists in the ustream-ssl library of OpenWrt, versions 18.06.4 and 15.05.1. When connecting to a remote server, the server's SSL certificate is checked but no action is taken when the certificate is invalid. An attacker could exploit this behavior by performing a man-in-the-middle attack, providing any certificate, leading to the theft of all the data sent by the client during the first request.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenWrt
Product-openwrtOpenWRT
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-2845
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.94% / 57.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Nov, 2017 | 18:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Cyberduck before 4.4.4 on Windows does not properly validate X.509 certificate chains, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof FTP-SSL servers via a certificate issued by an arbitrary root Certification Authority.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cyberduckn/aMicrosoft Corporation
Product-windowscyberduckn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-4873
Matching Score-4
Assigner-curl
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-curl
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.33% / 25.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 May, 2026 | 08:27
Updated-14 May, 2026 | 13:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
connection reuse ignores TLS requirement

A vulnerability exists where a connection requiring TLS incorrectly reuses an existing unencrypted connection from the same connection pool. If an initial transfer is made in clear-text (via IMAP, SMTP, or POP3), a subsequent request to that same host bypasses the TLS requirement and instead transmit data unencrypted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-CURL
Product-curlcurl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-319
Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information
CVE-2026-49267
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 8.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jun, 2026 | 07:53
Updated-21 Jul, 2026 | 19:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Airflow: No certificate validation on SMTP STARTTLS connections

Apache Airflow's EmailOperator and the underlying `airflow.utils.email` helpers established SMTP STARTTLS connections without verifying the remote certificate when the deployment used `[email] smtp_starttls=True` without `[email] smtp_ssl`. An attacker positioned between the worker and the configured SMTP server (network MITM — typical hostile-network attack-surface for environments where the SMTP relay sits outside the worker's trust boundary) could present a self-signed certificate, have the worker complete the STARTTLS handshake silently, and capture the SMTP AUTH credentials and message contents the worker forwarded. This CVE covers the **core apache-airflow side** of the same root cause already covered for the SMTP provider by `CVE-2026-41016` (published 2026-04-27, covering `apache-airflow-providers-smtp`). Users who already applied the SMTP-provider fix from CVE-2026-41016 should additionally upgrade `apache-airflow` to 3.2.2 or later to cover the core-side path through `airflow.utils.email`. Affects deployments configured with `smtp_starttls=True` and `smtp_ssl=False` where the SMTP relay is reachable across a less-trusted network segment than the worker. Users are advised to upgrade to `apache-airflow` 3.2.2 or later.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-airflowApache Airflow
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-48249
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 6.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 May, 2026 | 17:11
Updated-28 Jul, 2026 | 01:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Open ISES Tickets < 3.44.2 Disabled TLS Certificate Verification in rm/incs/mobile_login.inc.php

Open ISES Tickets before 3.44.2 disables TLS certificate verification in rm/incs/mobile_login.inc.php by setting CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER to false (and not setting CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST) when issuing outbound HTTPS requests issued during the mobile (RouteMate) login flow. An attacker positioned on the network path between the server and the remote endpoint can present a forged certificate to intercept, monitor, or modify the request and response, including any API keys or session-bearing data in transit.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Open ISES
Product-Tickets
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-48247
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 6.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 May, 2026 | 17:11
Updated-28 Jul, 2026 | 01:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Open ISES Tickets < 3.44.2 Disabled TLS Certificate Verification in incs/functions.inc.php

Open ISES Tickets before 3.44.2 disables TLS certificate verification in incs/functions.inc.php by setting CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER to false (and not setting CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST) when issuing outbound HTTPS requests for general-purpose outbound HTTPS requests issued by the shared helper functions. An attacker positioned on the network path between the server and the remote endpoint can present a forged certificate to intercept, monitor, or modify the request and response, including any API keys or session-bearing data in transit.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Open ISES
Product-Tickets
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-48246
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 6.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 May, 2026 | 17:11
Updated-28 Jul, 2026 | 01:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Open ISES Tickets < 3.44.2 Disabled TLS Certificate Verification in ajax/reports.php

Open ISES Tickets before 3.44.2 disables TLS certificate verification in ajax/reports.php by setting CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER to false (and not setting CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST) when issuing outbound HTTPS requests for Google Maps Directions API lookups during incident report generation. An attacker positioned on the network path between the server and the remote endpoint can present a forged certificate to intercept, monitor, or modify the request and response, including any API keys or session-bearing data in transit.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Open ISES
Product-Tickets
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-48248
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-VulnCheck
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 10.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 May, 2026 | 17:11
Updated-28 Jul, 2026 | 01:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Open ISES Tickets < 3.44.2 Disabled TLS Certificate Verification in incs/login.inc.php

Open ISES Tickets before 3.44.2 disables TLS certificate verification in incs/login.inc.php by setting CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER to false (and not setting CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST) when issuing outbound HTTPS requests issued during the login/authentication flow. An attacker positioned on the network path between the server and the remote endpoint can present a forged certificate to intercept, monitor, or modify the request and response, including any API keys or session-bearing data in transit.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Open ISES
Product-Tickets
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-24661
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.92% / 56.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Aug, 2020 | 15:06
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

GNOME Geary before 3.36.3 mishandles pinned TLS certificate verification for IMAP and SMTP services using invalid TLS certificates (e.g., self-signed certificates) when the client system is not configured to use a system-provided PKCS#11 store. This allows a meddler in the middle to present a different invalid certificate to intercept incoming and outgoing mail.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME ProjectFedora Project
Product-gearyfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-6175
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.59% / 44.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2020 | 20:42
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Citrix SD-WAN 10.2.x before 10.2.6 and 11.0.x before 11.0.3 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCitrix (Cloud Software Group, Inc.)
Product-citrix_sd-wan_centernetscaler_sd-wan_centern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found