A vulnerability was found in destiny.gg chat. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects the function websocket.Upgrader of the file main.go. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The name of the patch is bebd256fc3063111fb4503ca25e005ebf6e73780. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier VDB-216521 was assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

The Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.57. This is due to confusing logic functions missing or having incorrect nonce validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to gain and perform otherwise unauthorized access and actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

SpinetiX Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits a form to create a new admin user with full system privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.

UBICOD Medivision Digital Signage 1.5.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that submits a form to the /query/user/itSet endpoint to add a new admin user with elevated privileges.

SnapGear Management Console SG560 version 3.1.5 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits a form to create a new super user account with full administrative privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in SourceCodester Online Student Clearance System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Navigate CMS 2.8.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to upload malicious extensions through a crafted HTML page. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into executing arbitrary file uploads by leveraging the extension upload functionality without additional validation.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Guanzhou Tozed Kangwei Intelligent Technology ZLTS10G software version S10G_3.11.6 allows attackers to takeover user accounts via sending a crafted POST request to /goform/goform_set_cmd_process.

AVideo Platform 8.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to reset user passwords by exploiting the password recovery mechanism. Attackers can craft malicious requests to the recoverPass endpoint using the user's recovery token to change account credentials without authentication.

The CSRF protection mechanism implemented in the web administration panel on NETGEAR JGS516PE/GS116Ev2 v2.6.0.43 devices could be bypassed by omitting the CSRF token parameter in HTTP requests.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Social Login WP plugin <= 5.0.0.0 versions.

All versions of @fastify/oauth2 used a statically generated state parameter at startup time and were used across all requests for all users. The purpose of the Oauth2 state parameter is to prevent Cross-Site-Request-Forgery attacks. As such, it should be unique per user and should be connected to the user's session in some way that will allow the server to validate it. v7.2.0 changes the default behavior to store the state in a cookie with the http-only and same-site=lax attributes set. The state is now by default generated for every user. Note that this contains a breaking change in the checkStateFunction function, which now accepts the full Request object.

Intelbras RF1200 1.1.3 devices allow CSRF to bypass the login.html form, as demonstrated by launching a scrapy process.

An issue was discovered in the PageLayer plugin before 1.1.2 for WordPress. The pagelayer_settings_page function is vulnerable to CSRF, which can lead to XSS.

The ultimate-category-excluder plugin before 1.2 for WordPress allows ultimate-category-excluder.php CSRF.

Interactive Forms (IAF) in GX Software XperienCentral versions 10.31.0 until 10.33.0 was vulnerable to cross site request forgery (CSRF) because the unique token could be deduced using the names of all input fields.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alain Gonzalez WP RSS Images plugin <= 1.1 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Awin Awin – Advertiser Tracking for WooCommerce awin-advertiser-tracking allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Awin – Advertiser Tracking for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 2.0.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Enterprise MFA - TFA for Drupal allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Enterprise MFA - TFA for Drupal: from 0.0.0 before 4.7.0, from 5.0.0 before 5.2.0.

An issue was discovered in the PushToWatch extension for MediaWiki through 1.35.1. The primary form did not implement an anti-CSRF token and therefore was completely vulnerable to CSRF attacks against onSkinAddFooterLinks in PushToWatch.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in videowhisper Broadcast Live Video videowhisper-live-streaming-integration allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Broadcast Live Video: from n/a through <= 6.2.4.

Cotonti 1.0.0 (master branch, commit f43f1fc3) is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the administration configuration handler. In system/admin/admin.config.php, the configuration update action ('a=update') processes POST data via cot_config_update_options() without calling cot_check_xg() to validate the anti-CSRF token (the 'x' parameter), unlike other admin handlers (e.g. admin.structure.php, admin.cache.php). A remote attacker who lures an authenticated administrator into visiting a malicious page can force the browser to submit a forged request that modifies arbitrary core, module, or plugin configuration options, which can be leveraged to weaken security or enable further compromise.

The site-offline plugin before 1.4.4 for WordPress lacks certain wp_create_nonce and wp_verify_nonce calls, aka CSRF.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Louis Reingold Elegant Custom Fonts plugin <= 1.0 versions.

BigProf Online Invoicing System before 3.0 offers a functionality that allows an administrator to move the records of members across groups. The applicable endpoint (admin/pageTransferOwnership.php) lacks CSRF protection, resulting in an attacker being able to escalate their privileges to Administrator and effectively taking over the application.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the Admin portal of Cockpit CMS v2.5.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Administrator commands.

An issue was discovered in the XCloner Backup and Restore plugin before 4.2.153 for WordPress. It allows CSRF (via almost any endpoint).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Restrict route by IP allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Restrict route by IP: from 0.0.0 before 1.3.0.

Textpattern CMS 4.6.2 allows CSRF via the prefs subsystem.

Lack of an anti-CSRF token in the entire administrative interface in EPSON EPS TSE Server 8 (21.0.11) allows an unauthenticated attacker to force an administrator to execute external POST requests by visiting a malicious website.

The Scheduler in Grav CMS through 1.7.0-rc.17 allows an attacker to execute a system command by tricking an admin into visiting a malicious website (CSRF).

OpenAsset Digital Asset Management (DAM) through 12.0.19 does not correctly verify whether a request made to the application was intentionally made by the user, allowing for cross-site request forgery attacks on all user functions.

This affects the package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.12 from 0 and before 0.6.1; all versions of package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.11; the package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.13 from 0 and before 0.6.1. CSRF protection can be bypassed by forging a request that contains the same value for both the X-XSRF-TOKEN header and the XSRF-TOKEN cookie value, as the check in randomTokenCsrfProtection only checks that the two values are equal and non-empty.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AresIT WP Compress wp-compress-image-optimizer allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Compress: from n/a through <= 6.30.30.

TikiWiki 21.2 allows templates to be edited without CSRF protection. This could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of the affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a maliciously crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected system with the privileges of the user. These action include allowing attackers to submit their own code through an authenticated user resulting in local file Inclusion. If an authenticated user who is able to edit TikiWiki templates visits an malicious website, template code can be edited.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (UCM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user.

ARTEC EMA Mail 6.92 allows CSRF.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0). The CLI feature in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). This could allow an attacker to read or modify the device configuration by tricking an authenticated legitimate user into accessing a malicious link.

Maxum Rumpus 8.2.13 and 8.2.14 is affected by cross-site request forgery (CSRF). If an authenticated user visits a malicious page, unintended actions could be performed in the web application as the authenticated user.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WebAppick Challan webappick-pdf-invoice-for-woocommerce allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Challan: from n/a through <= 3.7.58.

forma.lms 2.3.0.2 is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in formalms/appCore/index.php?r=lms/profile/show&ap=saveinfo via a GET request to change the admin email address in order to accomplish an account takeover.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brainstorm Force US LLC Schema Pro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Schema Pro: from n/a through 2.7.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in apasionados DoFollow Case by Case dofollow-case-by-case allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects DoFollow Case by Case: from n/a through <= 3.5.1.

The IndieAuth plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.4. This is due to missing nonce verification on the `login_form_indieauth()` function and the authorization endpoint at wp-login.php?action=indieauth. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force authenticated users to approve OAuth authorization requests for attacker-controlled applications via a forged request granted they can trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link or visiting a malicious page while logged in. The attacker can then exchange the stolen authorization code for an access token, effectively taking over the victim's account with the granted scopes (create, update, delete).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VibeThemes WPLMS theme <= 4.900 versions.

The Relish (Verve Connect) VH510 device with firmware before 1.0.1.6L0516 contains multiple CSRF vulnerabilities within its web management portal. Attackers can, for example, use this to update the TR-069 configuration server settings (responsible for managing devices remotely). This makes it possible to remotely reboot the device or upload malicious firmware.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in e4jvikwp VikRestaurants vikrestaurants allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects VikRestaurants: from n/a through <= 1.3.3.

An issue was discovered in SmartStoreNET before 4.1.0. Lack of Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection may lead to elevation of privileges (e.g., /admin/customer/create to create an admin account).

The animate-it plugin before 2.3.6 for WordPress has CSRF in edsanimate.php.

Cloudera Data Engineering (CDE) before 1.1 was vulnerable to a CSRF attack.