Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools

openssl

Source -

NVDADPCNA

CNA CVEs -

2

ADP CVEs -

5

CISA CVEs -

0

NVD CVEs -

298
Related CVEsRelated VendorsRelated AssignersReports
301Vulnerabilities found

CVE-2023-3446
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-6.53% / 93.04%
||
7 Day CHG+1.00%
Published-19 Jul, 2023 | 11:31
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 16:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters

Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length. However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the '-check' option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-606
Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
CWE ID-CWE-1333
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
CVE-2023-2975
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.62% / 45.87%
||
7 Day CHG+0.10%
Published-14 Jul, 2023 | 11:16
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 16:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
AES-SIV implementation ignores empty associated data entries

Issue summary: The AES-SIV cipher implementation contains a bug that causes it to ignore empty associated data entries which are unauthenticated as a consequence. Impact summary: Applications that use the AES-SIV algorithm and want to authenticate empty data entries as associated data can be misled by removing, adding or reordering such empty entries as these are ignored by the OpenSSL implementation. We are currently unaware of any such applications. The AES-SIV algorithm allows for authentication of multiple associated data entries along with the encryption. To authenticate empty data the application has to call EVP_EncryptUpdate() (or EVP_CipherUpdate()) with NULL pointer as the output buffer and 0 as the input buffer length. The AES-SIV implementation in OpenSSL just returns success for such a call instead of performing the associated data authentication operation. The empty data thus will not be authenticated. As this issue does not affect non-empty associated data authentication and we expect it to be rare for an application to use empty associated data entries this is qualified as Low severity issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-ontap_select_deploy_administration_utilityopensslmanagement_services_for_element_software_and_netapp_hciOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CVE-2023-2650
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-75.12% / 99.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 May, 2023 | 13:40
Updated-19 Mar, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Possible DoS translating ASN.1 object identifiers

Issue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or data containing them may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of the OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message size limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those messages, which may lead to a Denial of Service. An OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers - most of which have no size limit. OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate an ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL type ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the sub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by periods. When one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large (these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds of KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long time. The time complexity is O(n^2) with 'n' being the size of the sub-identifiers in bytes (*). With OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names / identifiers in string form was introduced. This includes using OBJECT IDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching algorithms. Such OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure AlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify what cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or decrypt, or digest passed data. Applications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are affected, with any version of OpenSSL. If the use is for the mere purpose of display, the severity is considered low. In OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS. It also impacts anything that processes X.509 certificates, including simple things like verifying its signature. The impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a 100KiB limit on the peer's certificate chain. Additionally, this only impacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client authentication. In OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects, such as X.509 certificates. This is assumed to not happen in such a way that it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered not affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern, and the severity is therefore considered low.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLDebian GNU/Linux
Product-openssldebian_linuxOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
CVE-2023-1255
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.95% / 57.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Apr, 2023 | 16:14
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 16:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Input buffer over-read in AES-XTS implementation on 64 bit ARM

Issue summary: The AES-XTS cipher decryption implementation for 64 bit ARM platform contains a bug that could cause it to read past the input buffer, leading to a crash. Impact summary: Applications that use the AES-XTS algorithm on the 64 bit ARM platform can crash in rare circumstances. The AES-XTS algorithm is usually used for disk encryption. The AES-XTS cipher decryption implementation for 64 bit ARM platform will read past the end of the ciphertext buffer if the ciphertext size is 4 mod 5 in 16 byte blocks, e.g. 144 bytes or 1024 bytes. If the memory after the ciphertext buffer is unmapped, this will trigger a crash which results in a denial of service. If an attacker can control the size and location of the ciphertext buffer being decrypted by an application using AES-XTS on 64 bit ARM, the application is affected. This is fairly unlikely making this issue a Low severity one.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CVE-2023-0466
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.62% / 73.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Mar, 2023 | 14:30
Updated-19 Feb, 2025 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate policy check not enabled

The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented to implicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificate verification. However the implementation of the function does not enable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrect policies to pass the certificate verification. As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it was decided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() function. Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificate policy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitly enable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() with the X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument. Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are not commonly used by applications.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-0465
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.58% / 72.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Mar, 2023 | 14:30
Updated-18 Feb, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored

Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks. Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-0464
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-3.66% / 88.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Mar, 2023 | 16:36
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Excessive Resource Usage Verifying X.509 Policy Constraints

A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack on affected systems. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-4203
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-4.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.48% / 71.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2023 | 14:53
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X.509 Name Constraints Read Buffer Overflow

A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. The read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to a denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext) although we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory contents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CVE-2022-4304
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-16.20% / 96.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:04
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timing Oracle in RSA Decryption

A timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE. For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the application data sent over that connection.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stormshieldOpenSSL
Product-endpoint_securityopensslsslvpnstormshield_network_securityOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-203
Observable Discrepancy
CVE-2022-4450
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-20.44% / 97.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:04
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Double free after calling PEM_read_bio_ex

The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the "name" (e.g. "CERTIFICATE"), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the "name_out", "header" and "data" arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial of service attack. The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected. These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in OpenSSL 3.0. The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also impacted by this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stormshieldOpenSSL
Product-opensslstormshield_network_securityOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-415
Double Free
CVE-2023-0215
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-4.49% / 90.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:03
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Use-after-free following BIO_new_NDEF

The public API function BIO_new_NDEF is a helper function used for streaming ASN.1 data via a BIO. It is primarily used internally to OpenSSL to support the SMIME, CMS and PKCS7 streaming capabilities, but may also be called directly by end user applications. The function receives a BIO from the caller, prepends a new BIO_f_asn1 filter BIO onto the front of it to form a BIO chain, and then returns the new head of the BIO chain to the caller. Under certain conditions, for example if a CMS recipient public key is invalid, the new filter BIO is freed and the function returns a NULL result indicating a failure. However, in this case, the BIO chain is not properly cleaned up and the BIO passed by the caller still retains internal pointers to the previously freed filter BIO. If the caller then goes on to call BIO_pop() on the BIO then a use-after-free will occur. This will most likely result in a crash. This scenario occurs directly in the internal function B64_write_ASN1() which may cause BIO_new_NDEF() to be called and will subsequently call BIO_pop() on the BIO. This internal function is in turn called by the public API functions PEM_write_bio_ASN1_stream, PEM_write_bio_CMS_stream, PEM_write_bio_PKCS7_stream, SMIME_write_ASN1, SMIME_write_CMS and SMIME_write_PKCS7. Other public API functions that may be impacted by this include i2d_ASN1_bio_stream, BIO_new_CMS, BIO_new_PKCS7, i2d_CMS_bio_stream and i2d_PKCS7_bio_stream. The OpenSSL cms and smime command line applications are similarly affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stormshieldOpenSSL
Product-stormshield_management_centeropensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-416
Use After Free
CVE-2023-0216
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.85% / 76.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:03
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Invalid pointer dereference in d2i_PKCS7 functions

An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to load malformed PKCS7 data with the d2i_PKCS7(), d2i_PKCS7_bio() or d2i_PKCS7_fp() functions. The result of the dereference is an application crash which could lead to a denial of service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function however third party applications might call these functions on untrusted data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stormshieldOpenSSL
Product-stormshield_management_centeropensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2023-0217
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.85% / 76.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:02
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
NULL dereference validating DSA public key

An invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an application tries to check a malformed DSA public key by the EVP_PKEY_public_check() function. This will most likely lead to an application crash. This function can be called on public keys supplied from untrusted sources which could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function but applications might call the function if there are additional security requirements imposed by standards such as FIPS 140-3.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2023-0286
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-59.50% / 99.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:01
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X.400 address type confusion in X.509 GeneralName

There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial of service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which is uncommon. As such, this vulnerability is most likely to only affect applications which have implemented their own functionality for retrieving CRLs over a network.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stormshieldOpenSSL
Product-stormshield_management_centeropensslstormshield_network_securityOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-843
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CVE-2023-0401
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.85% / 76.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:00
Updated-04 Nov, 2025 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
NULL dereference during PKCS7 data verification

A NULL pointer can be dereferenced when signatures are being verified on PKCS7 signed or signedAndEnveloped data. In case the hash algorithm used for the signature is known to the OpenSSL library but the implementation of the hash algorithm is not available the digest initialization will fail. There is a missing check for the return value from the initialization function which later leads to invalid usage of the digest API most likely leading to a crash. The unavailability of an algorithm can be caused by using FIPS enabled configuration of providers or more commonly by not loading the legacy provider. PKCS7 data is processed by the SMIME library calls and also by the time stamp (TS) library calls. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call these functions however third party applications would be affected if they call these functions to verify signatures on untrusted data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-stormshieldOpenSSL
Product-stormshield_management_centeropensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2022-3996
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.22% / 65.33%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-13 Dec, 2022 | 15:43
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 01:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X.509 Policy Constraints Double Locking

If an X.509 certificate contains a malformed policy constraint and policy processing is enabled, then a write lock will be taken twice recursively. On some operating systems (most widely: Windows) this results in a denial of service when the affected process hangs. Policy processing being enabled on a publicly facing server is not considered to be a common setup. Policy processing is enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. Update (31 March 2023): The description of the policy processing enablement was corrected based on CVE-2023-0466.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-opensslOpenSSLsmi-s_provideraltavault_ost_plug-inopensslfas\/aff_baseboard_management_controllerontap_9hci_baseboard_management_controllermanagement_services_for_element_software
CWE ID-CWE-667
Improper Locking
CVE-2022-3786
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-92.49% / 99.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-14 Apr, 2026 | 10:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow

A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed a malicious certificate or for an application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address in a certificate to overflow an arbitrary number of bytes containing the `.' character (decimal 46) on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service). In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fedora ProjectOpenSSLSiemens AGNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)
Product-opensslfedoranode.jsOpenSSLSCALANCE X204RNA EEC (HSR)Calibre ICESCALANCE X204RNA (HSR)SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP)SIMATIC RTLS Locating ManagerSICAM GridPassMcenterSCALANCE X204RNA (PRP)SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP/HSR)
CWE ID-CWE-120
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
CVE-2022-3602
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-90.77% / 99.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-14 Apr, 2026 | 10:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow

A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NetApp, Inc.Fedora ProjectOpenSSLSiemens AGNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)
Product-opensslfedoranode.jsclustered_data_ontapOpenSSLSCALANCE X204RNA EEC (HSR)Calibre ICESCALANCE X204RNA (HSR)SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP)SIMATIC RTLS Locating ManagerSICAM GridPassMcenterSCALANCE X204RNA (PRP)SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP/HSR)
CWE ID-CWE-787
Out-of-bounds Write
CVE-2022-3358
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-2.85% / 85.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2022 | 15:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Using a Custom Cipher with NID_undef may lead to NULL encryption

OpenSSL supports creating a custom cipher via the legacy EVP_CIPHER_meth_new() function and associated function calls. This function was deprecated in OpenSSL 3.0 and application authors are instead encouraged to use the new provider mechanism in order to implement custom ciphers. OpenSSL versions 3.0.0 to 3.0.5 incorrectly handle legacy custom ciphers passed to the EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() and EVP_CipherInit_ex2() functions (as well as other similarly named encryption and decryption initialisation functions). Instead of using the custom cipher directly it incorrectly tries to fetch an equivalent cipher from the available providers. An equivalent cipher is found based on the NID passed to EVP_CIPHER_meth_new(). This NID is supposed to represent the unique NID for a given cipher. However it is possible for an application to incorrectly pass NID_undef as this value in the call to EVP_CIPHER_meth_new(). When NID_undef is used in this way the OpenSSL encryption/decryption initialisation function will match the NULL cipher as being equivalent and will fetch this from the available providers. This will succeed if the default provider has been loaded (or if a third party provider has been loaded that offers this cipher). Using the NULL cipher means that the plaintext is emitted as the ciphertext. Applications are only affected by this issue if they call EVP_CIPHER_meth_new() using NID_undef and subsequently use it in a call to an encryption/decryption initialisation function. Applications that only use SSL/TLS are not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.6 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.5).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2022-2097
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-4.42% / 90.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Jul, 2022 | 10:30
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 01:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
AES OCB fails to encrypt some bytes

AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was preexisting in the memory that wasn't written. In the special case of "in place" encryption, sixteen bytes of the plaintext would be revealed. Since OpenSSL does not support OCB based cipher suites for TLS and DTLS, they are both unaffected. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.5 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.4). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1q (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1p).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxSiemens AGOpenSSLNetApp, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-sinec_insdebian_linuxopensslh500sh410s_firmwarefedorah300s_firmwareactive_iq_unified_managerh500s_firmwareclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorh700s_firmwareh410sh410c_firmwareh410ch700sOpenSSLontap_antivirus_connectorsinec_inssmi-s_providerdebian_linuxopensslontap_select_deploy_administration_utilityoncommand_insightfedorahci_baseboard_management_controlleractive_iq_unified_manager_for_vmware_vspherebrocade_fabric_operating_system_firmwaresnapcenter
CWE ID-CWE-327
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
CVE-2022-2274
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-44.88% / 98.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jul, 2022 | 07:30
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
RSA implementation bug in AVX512IFMA instructions

The OpenSSL 3.0.4 release introduced a serious bug in the RSA implementation for X86_64 CPUs supporting the AVX512IFMA instructions. This issue makes the RSA implementation with 2048 bit private keys incorrect on such machines and memory corruption will happen during the computation. As a consequence of the memory corruption an attacker may be able to trigger a remote code execution on the machine performing the computation. SSL/TLS servers or other servers using 2048 bit RSA private keys running on machines supporting AVX512IFMA instructions of the X86_64 architecture are affected by this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-opensslh500sh410s_firmwareh700s_firmwareh410c_firmwareh300s_firmwareh500s_firmwareh410sh410ch300sh700ssnapcenterOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-787
Out-of-bounds Write
CVE-2022-2068
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-96.28% / 99.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jun, 2022 | 14:45
Updated-30 Dec, 2025 | 04:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
The c_rehash script allows command injection

In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NetApp, Inc.Broadcom Inc.OpenSSLFedora ProjectDebian GNU/LinuxSiemens AG
Product-h610sh610s_firmwareelement_softwarefas_8300aff_8700_firmwaresolidfireaff_8700aff_a400_firmwaresmi-s_providerontap_antivirus_connectorfas_a400debian_linuxfas_8700fas_a400_firmwaresantricity_smi-s_providerh410cbootstrap_osh500s_firmwareh300s_firmwarefas_8700_firmwareaff_8300_firmwarehci_management_nodeh615cfas_8300_firmwareh700saff_8300snapmanagerh610c_firmwareh410s_firmwareh300saff_a400hci_compute_nodesinec_insh500sh410sh700s_firmwareh610ch615c_firmwareontap_select_deploy_administration_utilityopensslsannavfedorah410c_firmwareOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
CVE-2022-1473
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-2.52% / 83.12%
||
7 Day CHG+0.14%
Published-03 May, 2022 | 15:15
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 17:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Resource leakage when decoding certificates and keys

The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This function is used when decoding certificates or keys. If a long lived process periodically decodes certificates or keys its memory usage will expand without bounds and the process might be terminated by the operating system causing a denial of service. Also traversing the empty hash table entries will take increasingly more time. Typically such long lived processes might be TLS clients or TLS servers configured to accept client certificate authentication. The function was added in the OpenSSL 3.0 version thus older releases are not affected by the issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-h410saff_8700_firmwareactive_iq_unified_managerfas_8300_firmwareh500s_firmwarefas_500f_firmwareaff_a400aff_500fsantricity_smi-s_provideropensslh700sh500sfas_8700_firmwareh700e_firmwarea250_firmwareaff_8700aff_a400_firmwareh500e_firmwaresolidfire\,_enterprise_sds_\&_hci_storage_nodeclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorclustered_data_ontaph300eh300e_firmwareaff_8300solidfire_\&_hci_management_nodeaff_500f_firmwareh700eh500eh700s_firmwarea700ssmi-s_providera250fas_8700h410s_firmwaresnapmanagerfabric-attached_storage_a400_firmwareh300s_firmwarefas_8300fas_500faff_8300_firmwareh300sa700s_firmwarefabric-attached_storage_a400OpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-459
Incomplete Cleanup
CVE-2022-1434
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.06% / 60.85%
||
7 Day CHG+0.03%
Published-03 May, 2022 | 15:15
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 04:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect MAC key used in the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite

The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is 1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-aff_8300aff_500f_firmwarea700s_firmwareopensslfas_500f_firmwaresolidfire_\&_hci_management_nodeh300s_firmwareaff_a400_firmwareh410sh300sfabric-attached_storage_a400_firmwareh300e_firmwareclustered_data_ontapsmi-s_providerh500eh500s_firmwareh500e_firmwareaff_500fa700sh700eaff_8700_firmwareh300ea250_firmwareh500sactive_iq_unified_managerfas_8700aff_8700aff_8300_firmwarefas_8700_firmwaresnapmanagerh410s_firmwareh700s_firmwareaff_a400clustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorfas_8300_firmwarea250solidfire\,_enterprise_sds_\&_hci_storage_nodeh700e_firmwarefas_8300fabric-attached_storage_a400h700sfas_500fsantricity_smi-s_providerOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-327
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
CVE-2022-1343
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.21% / 65.17%
||
7 Day CHG+0.04%
Published-03 May, 2022 | 15:15
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 17:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate

The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-h410saff_8700_firmwareactive_iq_unified_managerfas_8300_firmwarefas_500f_firmwareh500s_firmwareaff_a400aff_500fsantricity_smi-s_provideropensslh700sh500sfas_8700_firmwarea250_firmwareh700e_firmwareaff_8700h500e_firmwaresolidfire\,_enterprise_sds_\&_hci_storage_nodeclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorclustered_data_ontaph300eh300e_firmwareaff_500f_firmwaresolidfire_\&_hci_management_nodeaff_8300h700eh500eh700s_firmwarea700ssmi-s_providera250fas_8700fabric-attached_storage_a400_firmwaresnapmanagerh300sh410s_firmwarefas_8300h300s_firmwarefas_500faff_8300_firmwareaff_a400_firmwarea700s_firmwarefabric-attached_storage_a400OpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-1292
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-82.61% / 99.63%
||
7 Day CHG-0.61%
Published-03 May, 2022 | 15:15
Updated-30 Dec, 2025 | 04:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
The c_rehash script allows command injection

The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NetApp, Inc.OpenSSLOracle CorporationFedora ProjectDebian GNU/LinuxSiemens AG
Product-clustered_data_ontapopensslsolidfire_\&_hci_management_nodemysql_workbenchenterprise_manager_ops_centera700s_firmwaresolidfire\,_enterprise_sds_\&_hci_storage_nodeaff_500f_firmwarebrownfield_connectivity_gatewayh300e_firmwarefas_8300_firmwareaff_500ffedoraa250_firmwareh700eh500e_firmwarea250snapcenteraff_a400active_iq_unified_manageraff_8700fabric-attached_storage_a400_firmwaredebian_linuxh300ea700sfas_500f_firmwarefas_8700aff_8300h300s_firmwareaff_a400_firmwarefabric-attached_storage_a400oncommand_insightfas_8300fas_8700_firmwarefas_500fh410s_firmwaresnapmanagerh300sh700e_firmwareaff_8700_firmwareclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorsantricity_smi-s_providerh700saff_8300_firmwareh500eh700s_firmwareoncommand_workflow_automationh410sh500s_firmwaresmi-s_providerh500smysql_serverOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
CVE-2022-0778
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-70.56% / 99.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Mar, 2022 | 17:05
Updated-22 May, 2026 | 13:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Infinite loop in BN_mod_sqrt() reachable when parsing certificates

The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters. Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the certificate signature, any process that parses an externally supplied certificate may thus be subject to a denial of service attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted private keys as they can contain explicit elliptic curve parameters. Thus vulnerable situations include: - TLS clients consuming server certificates - TLS servers consuming client certificates - Hosting providers taking certificates or private keys from customers - Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from subscribers - Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters Also any other applications that use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS issue. In the OpenSSL 1.0.2 version the public key is not parsed during initial parsing of the certificate which makes it slightly harder to trigger the infinite loop. However any operation which requires the public key from the certificate will trigger the infinite loop. In particular the attacker can use a self-signed certificate to trigger the loop during verification of the certificate signature. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1n and 3.0.2 on the 15th March 2022. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.2 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1n (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1m). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zd (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zc).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NetApp, Inc.Tenable, Inc.Siemens AGNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLMariaDB FoundationDebian GNU/LinuxFedora Project
Product-debian_linuxsantricity_smi-s_providernode.jsopenssla250mariadb500fclustered_data_ontap500f_firmwarea250_firmwarenessusclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorstoragegridfedoracloud_volumes_ontap_mediatorOpenSSLSIMATIC MV550 HSCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C AC/DC/RlySCALANCE XR326-2C PoE WG (without UL)SIPLUS S7-1200 CP 1243-1SIMATIC CP 1242-7 V2SCALANCE MUM856-1 (RoW)SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1513R-1 PNSCALANCE XF204-2BASCALANCE X307-3SIMATIC RF188CSCALANCE M876-4 (NAM)SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/DCSCALANCE W786-1 RJ45SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/RlySCALANCE M876-4 (EU)SCALANCE LPE9403SIMATIC CP 1628SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1517TF-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C AC/DC/RlySIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DCSCALANCE X306-1LD FESCALANCE MUM853-1 (EU)SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLYSINAMICS Startdrive V15.1SIMATIC S7-1500 ET 200pro: CPU 1516PRO F-2 PNSIMATIC CP 443-1 OPC UASCALANCE S615 LAN-RouterSCALANCE XB213-3 (SC, E/IP)SIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1510SP-1 PNSCALANCE XR526-8C, 24V (L3 int.)SCALANCE XB208 (PN)SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1512C-1 PNSIRIUS Soft Starter ES V15.1 (TIA Portal)Security Configuration Tool (SCT)SIPLUS NET CP 1242-7 V2SIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1512SP F-1 PNSCALANCE W748-1 M12SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1511-1 PN T1 RAILSCALANCE X308-2LHBFCClientSCALANCE XR528-6M (2HR2)SIMATIC HMI Unified Comfort Panels familySCALANCE XR326-2C PoE WGSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511C-1 PNSIMATIC Cloud Connect 7 CC716SIMATIC RF166CSIMATIC WinCC V17SIPLUS NET SCALANCE XC216-4CSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DCSIMATIC Logon V1.6SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DPSCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-RouterSCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front)RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510SIMATIC PCS 7 TeleControlSCALANCE WUM763-1SCALANCE XC216EECSIMATIC RF615RSCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front)SCALANCE XR552-12M (2HR2, L3 int.)SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front)SCALANCE X320-1 FESCALANCE X320-1-2LD FESIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DCSCALANCE M804PBRUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524SCALANCE XF204-2SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated)SCALANCE XR324WG (24 X FE, DC 24V)SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/DCSIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1510SP F-1 PNSINAMICS DCC V15.1SCALANCE W1788-2IA M12SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front)SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFPSINEMA Remote Connect ServerSIPLUS NET SCALANCE XC206-2SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLYSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLYSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1515F-2 PNSINAMICS DCC V16SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US)SCALANCE X202-2P IRTSCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V)SCALANCE XR524-8C, 2x230V (L3 int.)SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/RLYSIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1510SP F-1 PN RAILTeleControl Server Basic V3SCALANCE W1748-1 M12SCALANCE XC206-2SFP G (EIP DEF.)SCALANCE XR526-8C, 1x230V (L3 int.)SCALANCE XC216-4C G (EIP Def.)SIMATIC WinCC Unified (TIA Portal)SCALANCE XM408-8CSIMATIC CP 1243-8 IRCSCALANCE W1788-2 EEC M12SCALANCE X212-2SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1515F-2 PN T2 RAILSIMATIC S7-PLCSIM AdvancedSCALANCE WAM766-1 EECSCALANCE W788-2 M12SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC RAILSCALANCE X206-1LDSIRIUS Soft Starter ES V17 (TIA Portal)SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/RlySCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front)SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear)SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1517H-3 PNSIMATIC RF610RSCALANCE X202-2P IRT PROSIMATIC MV550 SSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC RAILSCALANCE X408-2SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C AC/DC/RlySCALANCE XP208 (Ethernet/IP)SIMATIC PDMSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516-3 PN/DP RAILSCALANCE XC224-4C GSIMATIC RF185CSCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front)SIMATIC CP 1243-7 LTE USRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511TF-1 PNRUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAMSCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear)SCALANCE X308-2M TSSIMATIC S7-1500 ET 200pro: CPU 1513PRO-2 PNSCALANCE W1750D (ROW)SIPLUS S7-1200 CP 1243-1 RAILSCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V)SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V)SCALANCE X308-2M PoESIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1517-3 PN/DPSIMATIC CP 1243-1SIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1510SP-1 PN RAILSCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-RouterSCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear)SIMATIC CP 1626SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516-3 PN/DP TX RAILSCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front)SCALANCE XC206-2SFP GSCALANCE XC216-3G PoE (54 V DC)SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU S7-1518F-4 PN/DP ODKSCALANCE W1788-1 M12SCALANCE XM408-4C (L3 int.)RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000SINAUT Software ST7scSIRIUS Soft Starter ES V16 (TIA Portal)SCALANCE XC206-2 (SC)SCALANCE XR528-6M (L3 int.)SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DCSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLYSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V)SINEC INSSIPLUS ET 200SP CP 1543SP-1 ISEC TX RAILSIPLUS NET SCALANCE XC206-2SFPSIPLUS NET CP 443-1 AdvancedSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215C AC/DC/RLYSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515T-2 PNSCALANCE XM416-4C (L3 int.)SCALANCE XP216POE EECSIMOCODE ES V17SCALANCE XB213-3 (SC, PN)SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU S7-1518-4 PN/DP ODKSCALANCE X304-2FESCALANCE XC216-4CSCALANCE XP216SIPLUS NET CP 343-1 AdvancedSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLYSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515F-2 PNSIPLUS ET 200SP CP 1543SP-1 ISECSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated)SIMATIC PCS 7 V9.0SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V)SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45SCALANCE XB205-3LD (SC, PN)SCALANCE X308-2SCALANCE XR552-12M (2HR2)SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EECSCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear)SCALANCE XB213-3 (ST, PN)SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US)SCALANCE WUM766-1 (USA)SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1516T-3 PN/DPSCALANCE XR524-8C, 1x230VSCALANCE X208PROSIMATIC RF186CSCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated)SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DPSCALANCE XP208PoE EECSCALANCE XR528-6M (2HR2, L3 int.)SIMATIC STEP 7 V15.1SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/RlySIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516F-3 PN/DPSIMATIC STEP 7 V5SCALANCE XC206-2SFP EECSCALANCE X204-2LD TSSIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1512SP-1 PN RAILSCALANCE XP208SCALANCE XB216 (PN)SIMATIC NET PC Software V15SCALANCE X310FESIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C AC/DC/RLYSCALANCE XF204IRTSCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear)SIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1510SP F-1 PNSCALANCE W778-1 M12 EECSCALANCE XB205-3LD (SC, E/IP)RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511SCALANCE XR328-4C WG (28xGE, DC 24V)SCALANCE XC216-4C G EECSIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1512SP-1 PNSCALANCE SC646-2CSCALANCE X216SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFPSCALANCE XB205-3 (ST, E/IP)SIMATIC WinCC V16RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear)SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1515R-2 PN TX RAILSCALANCE XB213-3LD (SC, PN)SCALANCE XC224-4C G (EIP Def.)SIMATIC WinCC V7.4SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated)SCALANCE XR524-8C, 24VSCALANCE XC206-2G PoE EEC (54 V DC)SIMATIC NET PC Software V14SCALANCE X308-2 RD (inkl. SIPLUS variants)TIA AdministratorSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/RlySCALANCE M876-4SCALANCE XC208G PoE (54 V DC)SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515R-2 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFPSCALANCE X200-4P IRTSIMATIC RF188CISIMATIC RF685RSCALANCE X308-2LDSCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (USA)SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518HF-4 PNSCALANCE X212-2LDSINAUT ST7CCSCALANCE W761-1 RJ45SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front)SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/RLYSIPLUS NET CP 1543-1SCALANCE SC622-2CSIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1512SP F-1 PN RAILSIMATIC CP 1543-1SIMATIC MV540 SSIPLUS NET SCALANCE XC208SIMATIC RF650RSCALANCE WUM766-1SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated)SCALANCE XR524-8C, 24V (L3 int.)SCALANCE XP208EECSCALANCE X308-2LH+SCALANCE XR526-8C, 1x230VSCALANCE XR328-4C WG (28xGE, AC 230V)SCALANCE W1750D (USA)SCALANCE XF202-2P IRTSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1511F-1 PNSCALANCE W774-1 RJ45SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1217C DC/DC/DCSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C AC/DC/RLYIndustrial Edge - SIMATIC S7 Connector AppSCALANCE WAM766-1SCALANCE XC216-3G PoETIA Portal Cloud V17SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/RlySCALANCE XC224-4C G EECSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/RlySCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear)OpenPCS 7 V8.2SCALANCE XB205-3 (ST, PN)SCALANCE X204-2SIMOCODE ES V15.1SCALANCE XC216-4C GSINAMICS Startdrive V16SIMATIC WinCC V15.1SIMATIC MV540 HSINEC NMSSCALANCE W788-2 RJ45SCALANCE XR526-8C, 24VSCALANCE X204-2FMSCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (USA)SCALANCE XB208 (E/IP)RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512SCALANCE W788-1 M12SIMATIC MV560 USIMATIC S7-1500 ET 200pro: CPU 1513PRO F-2 PNSIMATIC STEP 7 V17SCALANCE X204IRT PROSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DPSCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V)SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front)SCALANCE W1750D (JP)SCALANCE XC208GSCALANCE W1788-2 M12RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500SCALANCE M874-3SCALANCE W786-2 SFPSCALANCE XR526-8C, 2x230VSIMOTIONSCALANCE XM416-4CSIMATIC STEP 7 V16SCALANCE XC206-2G PoESCALANCE XR528-6MSIMATIC CP 1542SP-1SCALANCE XF206-1SIPLUS NET SCALANCE X202-2P IRTSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated)SCALANCE XR526-8C, 2x230V (L3 int.)SCALANCE XC208EECSCALANCE XR328-4C WG (24xFE, 4xGE,DC24V)SCALANCE XC206-2SFPSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1513-1 PNSCALANCE XF204-2BA IRTSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1513F-1 PNSCALANCE W774-1 M12 EECSIMATIC NET PC Software V16SIMATIC MV560 XOpenPCS 7 V9.0SCALANCE X202-2IRTSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511F-1 PNSCALANCE X201-3P IRTSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DCSCALANCE XC208SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated)SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1515F-2 PN RAILSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1516TF-3 PN/DPSIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.4SCALANCE XR524-8C, 2x230VSCALANCE W748-1 RJ45SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DCIndustrial Edge - OPC UA ConnectorSIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.3SCALANCE SC642-2CSIMATIC CP 443-1 AdvancedSIMATIC CP 1243-7 LTE EUSCALANCE W788-1 RJ45SIMOCODE ES V16SCALANCE X204-2LDSCALANCE M876-3 (ROK)SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1515R-2 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518TF-4 PN/DPSIPLUS TIM 1531 IRCSCALANCE XP216EECSCALANCE X208SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V)TIA Portal Cloud V16SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLYSCALANCE SC632-2CSIMATIC S7-1500 ET 200pro: CPU 1516PRO-2 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1513F-1 PNSCALANCE XP216 (Ethernet/IP)SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518HF-4 PNSIMATIC RF680RSCALANCE X224OpenPCS 7 V9.1SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-RouterSCALANCE XB205-3 (SC, PN)SIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1512SP F-1 PNSCALANCE XR328-4C WG (24xFE,4xGE,AC230V)SCALANCE WAM763-1SCALANCE XB213-3LD (SC, E/IP)SIMATIC Drive Controller CPU 1504D TFSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518T-4 PN/DPSCALANCE W738-1 M12SCALANCE M876-3SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear)SCALANCE X310TIM 1531 IRCSCALANCE XR324WG (24 x FE, AC 230V)SCALANCE XC216SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1517T-3 PN/DPRUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EUSIMATIC CP 1543SP-1SCALANCE XR552-12MSCALANCE XC206-2 (ST/BFOC)SCALANCE X308-2MSCALANCE M874-2SCALANCE W778-1 M12SCALANCE XB213-3 (ST, E/IP)SIMATIC WinCC V7.5SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515TF-2 PNSCALANCE XC208G EECSIMATIC RF186CISCALANCE XB216 (E/IP)SCALANCE S615 EEC LAN-RouterSIMATIC CP 343-1 AdvancedSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511-1 PNSCALANCE X201-3P IRT PROSIMATIC Drive Controller CPU 1507D TFSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DCSCALANCE XF201-3P IRTSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1511-1 PN TX RAILRUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RESCALANCE XM408-4CRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536SCALANCE SC636-2CSIRIUS Safety ES V17 (TIA Portal)SIMATIC PCS 7 V9.1SCALANCE XF204 DNASIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1516F-3 PN/DPSIMATIC RF360RSCALANCE X206-1SIMATIC PCS neo (Administration Console)SIMATIC Process Historian OPC UA ServerSCALANCE XC206-2SFP G EECSINAMICS Startdrive V17SCALANCE XF204SCALANCE XR328-4C WG (24XFE, 4XGE, 24V)SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516-3 PN/DPSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/RlySIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C AC/DC/RlySCALANCE X204-2TSSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1517F-3 PN/DPSIMATIC PCS 7 V8.2SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DCSIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1512SP-1 PNRUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW Station Access Controller (SAC)SCALANCE XC208G (EIP def.)SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1511-1 PNSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V)SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DCSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DCSIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC2 (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (USA)SCALANCE X204IRTSCALANCE XC206-2G PoE (54 V DC)SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516F-3 PN/DP RAILSCALANCE W734-1 RJ45SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1513-1 PNSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1517H-3 PNSIMATIC WinCC V7.3SCALANCE XC208G PoESCALANCE X307-3LDSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511T-1 PNSCALANCE MUM856-1 (EU)SCALANCE XC224SCALANCE XM408-8C (L3 int.)SIMATIC NET PC Software V17SIMATIC Cloud Connect 7 CC712SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V)SCALANCE XF204-2BA DNASCALANCE XR524-8C, 1x230V (L3 int.)SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1516-3 PN/DPSIMATIC CP 1545-1SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515-2 PNSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated)SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DCSIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1510SP-1 PNSCALANCE XF208
CWE ID-CWE-835
Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
CVE-2021-4160
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.80% / 88.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Jan, 2022 | 21:28
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
BN_mod_exp may produce incorrect results on MIPS

There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing private keys. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 on the 15th of December 2021. For the 1.0.2 release it is addressed in git commit 6fc1aaaf3 that is available to premium support customers only. It will be made available in 1.0.2zc when it is released. The issue only affects OpenSSL on MIPS platforms. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1m (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1l). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zc-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zb).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxSiemens AGOpenSSLOracle Corporation
Product-jd_edwards_world_securityhealth_sciences_inform_publisherpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsdebian_linuxsinec_insopensslenterprise_manager_ops_centerjd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolsOpenSSL
CVE-2021-4044
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-50.10% / 98.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2021 | 18:40
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Invalid handling of X509_verify_cert() internal errors in libssl

Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may return a negative return value to indicate an internal error (for example out of memory). Such a negative return value is mishandled by OpenSSL and will cause an IO function (such as SSL_connect() or SSL_do_handshake()) to not indicate success and a subsequent call to SSL_get_error() to return the value SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY. This return value is only supposed to be returned by OpenSSL if the application has previously called SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback(). Since most applications do not do this the SSL_ERROR_WANT_RETRY_VERIFY return value from SSL_get_error() will be totally unexpected and applications may not behave correctly as a result. The exact behaviour will depend on the application but it could result in crashes, infinite loops or other similar incorrect responses. This issue is made more serious in combination with a separate bug in OpenSSL 3.0 that will cause X509_verify_cert() to indicate an internal error when processing a certificate chain. This will occur where a certificate does not include the Subject Alternative Name extension but where a Certificate Authority has enforced name constraints. This issue can occur even with valid chains. By combining the two issues an attacker could induce incorrect, application dependent behaviour. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)
Product-h300e500f_firmwareopenssla250_firmwarecloud_backuph500se-series_performance_analyzerh410c_firmwareh300s_firmwareh410sh300snode.jssnapcenterh300e_firmware500fh500eontap_select_deploy_administration_utilityh410s_firmwareh700s_firmwareh500s_firmwareh500e_firmwarea250h700eh410ch700e_firmwareh700sOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-835
Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
CVE-2021-3712
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-50.44% / 98.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Aug, 2021 | 14:50
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 15:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Read buffer overruns processing ASN.1 strings

ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Oracle CorporationDebian GNU/LinuxTenable, Inc.NetApp, Inc.OpenSSLSiemens AGMcAfee, LLC
Product-zfs_storage_appliance_kitessbasestorage_encryptionmysql_workbenchcommunications_cloud_native_core_security_edge_protection_proxycommunications_cloud_native_core_consolecommunications_session_border_controllerenterprise_communications_brokerdebian_linuxpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsmanageability_software_development_kitmysql_serverclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorjd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolsjd_edwards_world_securityhci_management_nodenessus_network_monitorsantricity_smi-s_providersolidfiresecure_backupclustered_data_ontaptenable.scmysql_connectorscommunications_unified_session_managermysql_enterprise_monitorenterprise_session_border_controllere-series_santricity_os_controlleropensslsinec_infrastructure_network_servicesepolicy_orchestratorhealth_sciences_inform_publishercommunications_cloud_native_core_unified_data_repositoryOpenSSLSCALANCE X204-2FMSCALANCE M876-4 (EU)SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V)SCALANCE W1748-1 M12RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (USA)SCALANCE X310FESCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear)SIMATIC CP 1542SP-1SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V)Industrial Edge - Machine Insight AppSCALANCE X307-3SCALANCE XF201-3P IRTSCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V)SIPLUS ET 200SP CP 1543SP-1 ISEC TX RAILSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C AC/DC/RLYSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215C AC/DC/RLYSCALANCE XF206-1SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear)SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front)SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/RlySCALANCE SC646-2CRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front)SCALANCE X201-3P IRT PROSCALANCE X208PROSCALANCE X308-2LHRUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512SCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-RouterSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/DCSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DCSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLYSCALANCE W1788-2 M12SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45SCALANCE X202-2P IRTSCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front)SCALANCE S615 LAN-RouterSCALANCE W774-1 M12 EECRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated)SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/RlySIPLUS NET CP 1242-7 V2SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DCSCALANCE WUM766-1 (USA)SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear)SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C AC/DC/RlySIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/DCSCALANCE W778-1 M12 EECSCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front)SCALANCE X306-1LD FESCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V)SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front)SCALANCE X201-3P IRTSCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front)SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1217C DC/DC/DCSIMATIC CP 1242-7 V2SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC RAILSCALANCE X202-2P IRT PROSCALANCE W1788-2 EEC M12SCALANCE SC642-2CSCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V)SIMATIC CP 1543-1SCALANCE SC632-2CSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/RLYSCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-RouterSCALANCE XF208SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear)SCALANCE XF204IRTSCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US)SIMATIC CP 1243-8 IRCSCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (USA)SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V)SCALANCE X308-2M PoESCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear)SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLYSCALANCE X320-1-2LD FESCALANCE X200-4P IRTSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/RlySIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/RlySIPLUS ET 200SP CP 1543SP-1 ISECSIMATIC CP 1543SP-1SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLYSCALANCE M876-3 (ROK)SCALANCE MUM853-1 (EU)SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DCSCALANCE X216SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DCSCALANCE X212-2SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DCSCALANCE X308-2LDSCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (USA)TIA AdministratorSCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front)SCALANCE X204-2LDSCALANCE X204-2TSSCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front)SCALANCE WAM766-1 EECSIMATIC Process Historian OPC UA ServerSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C AC/DC/RlySCALANCE X408-2BFCClientSCALANCE M874-3SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated)SCALANCE M876-4 (NAM)SCALANCE W786-2 SFPSCALANCE X202-2IRTSCALANCE X212-2LDSCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated)SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/RlySIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/RlySCALANCE W738-1 M12SCALANCE W1788-2IA M12SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45SCALANCE X308-2LH+SCALANCE X206-1LDSCALANCE X204IRT PROSCALANCE X204-2SIMATIC CP 1243-1SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear)SCALANCE X206-1Industrial Edge - PROFINET IO ConnectorSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLYSCALANCE WUM766-1SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLYSCALANCE W721-1 RJ45SINEMA Server V14SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear)SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DCSIMATIC CP 1243-7 LTE EUSCALANCE XF204-2SCALANCE MUM856-1 (EU)SCALANCE X308-2MSCALANCE XF204-2BA IRTSIMATIC CP 1243-7 LTE USSCALANCE M874-2SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45SCALANCE W748-1 M12SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DCSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DCSCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear)SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DCSCALANCE X320-1 FESCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated)SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V)SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated)SCALANCE X307-3LDSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C AC/DC/RLYSCALANCE XF202-2P IRTRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000SCALANCE X310SCALANCE WAM766-1SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front)SINEMA Remote Connect ServerSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C AC/DC/RlySIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DCSIPLUS S7-1200 CP 1243-1SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated)SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-RouterSCALANCE W1788-1 M12SCALANCE X208SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EUSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C AC/DC/RlySIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLYSCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V)SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated)RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510SCALANCE X308-2M TSSINUMERIK OperateSCALANCE W788-2 M12SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US)SIMATIC PCS neo (Administration Console)SINEC NMSSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/RLYSIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC RAILSCALANCE M804PBSCALANCE W788-1 M12SIMATIC CP 1545-1SCALANCE M876-3SCALANCE SC636-2CSIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DCRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EECSCALANCE XF204SIPLUS S7-1200 CP 1243-1 RAILRUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RESCALANCE SC622-2CSIPLUS NET SCALANCE X308-2SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated)SCALANCE MUM856-1 (RoW)SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/RlySCALANCE W778-1 M12SIPLUS NET CP 1543-1SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V)SCALANCE X304-2FERUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAMSCALANCE X224SCALANCE X308-2SCALANCE X204IRTSCALANCE X204-2LD TS
CWE ID-CWE-125
Out-of-bounds Read
CVE-2021-3711
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-87.82% / 99.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Aug, 2021 | 14:50
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow

In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxOpenSSLNetApp, Inc.Oracle CorporationTenable, Inc.
Product-communications_unified_session_managerjd_edwards_world_securitypeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolshealth_sciences_inform_publisheropensslcommunications_cloud_native_core_security_edge_protection_proxyactive_iq_unified_managermysql_connectorsoncommand_workflow_automationtenable.scsantricity_smi-s_providerstorage_encryptionsolidfiresnapcenterenterprise_session_border_controllerclustered_data_ontapdebian_linuxmanageability_software_development_kitessbasecommunications_cloud_native_core_unified_data_repositoryhci_management_nodemysql_enterprise_monitore-series_santricity_os_controllerzfs_storage_appliance_kitclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectornessus_network_monitormysql_servercommunications_session_border_controllerenterprise_communications_brokerjd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolsoncommand_insightOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-120
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
CVE-2021-3450
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-18.34% / 96.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Mar, 2021 | 14:25
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT

The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-windriverSonicWall Inc.FreeBSD FoundationFedora ProjectOracle CorporationTenable, Inc.McAfee, LLCNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-freebsdpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsopensslnessus_agentsonicosmysql_connectorssantricity_smi-s_providerstoragegridnode.jsjd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolsgraalvmontap_select_deploy_administration_utilityfedorasma100_firmwarenessus_network_monitornessusweb_gatewayjd_edwards_world_securityenterprise_manager_for_storage_managementcloud_volumes_ontap_mediatorcapture_clientsma100linuxoncommand_workflow_automationmysql_workbenchsantricity_smi-s_provider_firmwareweblogic_serverstoragegrid_firmwaremysql_enterprise_monitorsecure_global_desktopemail_securityweb_gateway_cloud_servicesecure_backupcommerce_guided_searchmysql_serverOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3449
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-62.91% / 99.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Mar, 2021 | 14:25
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing

An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SonicWall Inc.FreeBSD FoundationCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd.Fedora ProjectOracle CorporationTenable, Inc.Siemens AGDebian GNU/LinuxMcAfee, LLCNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-simatic_net_cp1243-7_lte_ussinamics_connect_300_firmwaresimatic_pcs_neosonicosscalance_s602_firmwarescalance_sc-600_firmwarescalance_xp-200simatic_s7-1200_cpu_1212csnapcenterscalance_xf-200basimatic_mv500quantum_security_gatewayessbasescalance_s602simatic_s7-1200_cpu_1212fc_firmwarequantum_security_management_firmwarenessus_network_monitorsimatic_net_cp_1545-1_firmwaresimatic_cp_1242-7_gprs_v2scalance_s615_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1215_fcsimatic_rf166c_firmwarescalance_xr528-6m_firmwarescalance_m-800_firmwaree-series_performance_analyzerscalance_xc-200_firmwarescalance_xr-300wg_firmwaresimatic_hmi_ktp_mobile_panelsscalance_s612_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518-4_pn\/dp_mfp_firmwaredebian_linuxsimatic_net_cp_1543-1_firmwaresimatic_mv500_firmwareruggedcom_rcm1224_firmwaresimatic_process_historian_opc_ua_server_firmwarescalance_sc-600simatic_net_cp_1243-1_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1214c_firmwarecommunications_communications_policy_managementsimatic_process_historian_opc_ua_serversecure_backupsimatic_net_cp_1542sp-1_irc_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1211c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1214cscalance_xf-200ba_firmwarequantum_security_managementsimatic_rf186c_firmwarescalance_w700simatic_net_cp_1542sp-1_ircstoragegridsimatic_hmi_comfort_outdoor_panels_firmwaresimatic_rf185cnode.jssinec_infrastructure_network_servicesscalance_s615graalvmsimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1214_fctim_1531_irc_firmwaresma100_firmwaresimatic_net_cp_1243-8_ircsimatic_net_cp_1243-8_irc_firmwaresimatic_rf186ci_firmwarenessussimatic_rf188ci_firmwarecloud_volumes_ontap_mediatorsimatic_net_cp1243-7_lte_us_firmwarelog_correlation_engineoncommand_workflow_automationscalance_xm-400_firmwarescalance_xr524-8c_firmwaresinumerik_opc_ua_serverscalance_s623_firmwarescalance_w700_firmwaremulti-domain_management_firmwarescalance_s627-2m_firmwarescalance_w1700_firmwaresimatic_net_cp_1545-1simatic_cloud_connect_7_firmwarescalance_xb-200_firmwarescalance_xc-200scalance_m-800jd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolssimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1214_fc_firmwarepeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsprimavera_unifieropensslruggedcom_rcm1224simatic_pcs_neo_firmwaresimatic_rf360rscalance_lpe9403simatic_cp_1242-7_gprs_v2_firmwaresimatic_hmi_basic_panels_2nd_generation_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518-4_pn\/dp_mfpscalance_xr528-6msimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1215_fc_firmwarescalance_xr-300wgscalance_s612simatic_rf360r_firmwaresinec_nmstim_1531_ircontap_select_deploy_administration_utilitysimatic_net_cp_1243-1fedorazfs_storage_appliance_kitsimatic_net_cp1243-7_lte_eu_firmwaresimatic_rf188csimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1217csimatic_rf185c_firmwaresimatic_net_cp_1543sp-1simatic_s7-1200_cpu_1215c_firmwareweb_gatewaysimatic_net_cp_1543-1simatic_s7-1200_cpu_1212c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1217c_firmwaresimatic_rf188cicapture_clientsimatic_hmi_ktp_mobile_panels_firmwaresma100scalance_xr524-8csimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1215csimatic_logonsimatic_pcs_7_telecontrol_firmwaresimatic_net_cp_1543sp-1_firmwaremysql_workbenchsimatic_wincc_runtime_advancedscalance_s623secure_global_desktopweb_gateway_cloud_servicescalance_w1700scalance_xm-400freebsdscalance_lpe9403_firmwaremysql_serversimatic_pcs_7_telecontrolquantum_security_gateway_firmwaresimatic_wincc_telecontrolmysql_connectorssimatic_rf188c_firmwaresinec_pnimulti-domain_managementsimatic_pdmscalance_s627-2msimatic_rf186cioncommand_insightjd_edwards_world_securityenterprise_manager_for_storage_managementscalance_xp-200_firmwaresimatic_rf166csimatic_hmi_basic_panels_2nd_generationtia_administratoractive_iq_unified_managerscalance_xb-200tenable.scsimatic_hmi_comfort_outdoor_panelssimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1211csinema_serversinamics_connect_300scalance_xr552-12simatic_cloud_connect_7simatic_rf186cscalance_xr526-8c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1212fcscalance_xr552-12_firmwaresimatic_net_cp1243-7_lte_euscalance_xr526-8csimatic_pdm_firmwaresantricity_smi-s_providerOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2021-23841
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-7.47% / 93.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2021 | 16:55
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Null pointer deref in X509_issuer_and_serial_hash()

The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within an X509 certificate. However it fails to correctly handle any errors that may occur while parsing the issuer field (which might occur if the issuer field is maliciously constructed). This may subsequently result in a NULL pointer deref and a crash leading to a potential denial of service attack. The function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() is never directly called by OpenSSL itself so applications are only vulnerable if they use this function directly and they use it on certificates that may have been obtained from untrusted sources. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxSiemens AGApple Inc.OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.Oracle CorporationTenable, Inc.
Product-jd_edwards_world_securityiphone_ospeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolssinec_insenterprise_manager_for_storage_managementopensslbusiness_intelligencemacostenable.sconcommand_workflow_automationcommunications_cloud_native_core_policysnapcenterdebian_linuxessbasegraalvmipadossafarimysql_enterprise_monitorzfs_storage_appliance_kitnessus_network_monitormysql_serverenterprise_manager_ops_centeroncommand_insightOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2021-23840
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-50.73% / 98.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2021 | 16:55
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 15:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Integer overflow in CipherUpdate

Calls to EVP_CipherUpdate, EVP_EncryptUpdate and EVP_DecryptUpdate may overflow the output length argument in some cases where the input length is close to the maximum permissable length for an integer on the platform. In such cases the return value from the function call will be 1 (indicating success), but the output length value will be negative. This could cause applications to behave incorrectly or crash. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Oracle CorporationDebian GNU/LinuxFujitsu LimitedTenable, Inc.OpenSSLNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)McAfee, LLC
Product-m10-1_firmwarenessus_network_monitornode.jslog_correlation_enginem10-4s_firmwarebusiness_intelligencem12-2_firmwarem10-4m12-1_firmwarem10-4sgraalvmdebian_linuxenterprise_manager_for_storage_managementm10-1opensslm12-2s_firmwarecommunications_cloud_native_core_policym12-1nosql_databaseenterprise_manager_ops_centerepolicy_orchestratorm10-4_firmwaremysql_serverjd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolsm12-2sm12-2jd_edwards_world_securityOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-190
Integer Overflow or Wraparound
CVE-2021-23839
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-2.96% / 85.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2021 | 16:55
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect SSLv2 rollback protection

OpenSSL 1.0.2 supports SSLv2. If a client attempts to negotiate SSLv2 with a server that is configured to support both SSLv2 and more recent SSL and TLS versions then a check is made for a version rollback attack when unpadding an RSA signature. Clients that support SSL or TLS versions greater than SSLv2 are supposed to use a special form of padding. A server that supports greater than SSLv2 is supposed to reject connection attempts from a client where this special form of padding is present, because this indicates that a version rollback has occurred (i.e. both client and server support greater than SSLv2, and yet this is the version that is being requested). The implementation of this padding check inverted the logic so that the connection attempt is accepted if the padding is present, and rejected if it is absent. This means that such as server will accept a connection if a version rollback attack has occurred. Further the server will erroneously reject a connection if a normal SSLv2 connection attempt is made. Only OpenSSL 1.0.2 servers from version 1.0.2s to 1.0.2x are affected by this issue. In order to be vulnerable a 1.0.2 server must: 1) have configured SSLv2 support at compile time (this is off by default), 2) have configured SSLv2 support at runtime (this is off by default), 3) have configured SSLv2 ciphersuites (these are not in the default ciphersuite list) OpenSSL 1.1.1 does not have SSLv2 support and therefore is not vulnerable to this issue. The underlying error is in the implementation of the RSA_padding_check_SSLv23() function. This also affects the RSA_SSLV23_PADDING padding mode used by various other functions. Although 1.1.1 does not support SSLv2 the RSA_padding_check_SSLv23() function still exists, as does the RSA_SSLV23_PADDING padding mode. Applications that directly call that function or use that padding mode will encounter this issue. However since there is no support for the SSLv2 protocol in 1.1.1 this is considered a bug and not a security issue in that version. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2s-1.0.2x).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLSiemens AGOracle Corporation
Product-jd_edwards_world_securityenterprise_manager_for_storage_managementsinec_insgraalvmopensslzfs_storage_appliance_kitbusiness_intelligenceenterprise_manager_ops_centerOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-327
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
CVE-2020-1971
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-6.97% / 93.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Dec, 2020 | 15:30
Updated-29 May, 2026 | 16:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
EDIPARTYNAME NULL pointer dereference

The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL then this may occur. Note that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. This checking happens prior to the signatures on the certificate and CRL being verified. OpenSSL's s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the "-crl_download" option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools. Note that an unrelated bug means that affected versions of OpenSSL cannot parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However it is possible to construct a malformed EDIPARTYNAME that OpenSSL's parser will accept and hence trigger this attack. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 versions are affected by this issue. Other OpenSSL releases are out of support and have not been checked. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1i (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2x (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2w).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Oracle CorporationNetApp, Inc.Tenable, Inc.Siemens AGNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLDebian GNU/LinuxFedora Project
Product-santricity_smi-s_providerbusiness_intelligencecommunications_diameter_intelligence_hubaff_a250_firmwarehci_management_nodeoncommand_workflow_automationcommunications_session_border_controllerenterprise_manager_base_platformmysqlclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorenterprise_manager_ops_centerdata_ontapef600a_firmwareenterprise_session_border_controllernode.jse-series_santricity_os_controllerjd_edwards_world_securityfedorajd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolshci_compute_nodemysql_servernessus_network_monitorsolidfiremanageability_software_development_kitgraalvmlog_correlation_enginedebian_linuxessbaseapi_gatewayhttp_servercommunications_cloud_native_core_network_function_cloud_native_environmentcommunications_subscriber-aware_load_balancerhci_storage_nodesinec_infrastructure_network_servicesaff_a250opensslpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolscommunications_session_routerenterprise_communications_brokeroncommand_insightplug-in_for_symantec_netbackupsnapcenterenterprise_manager_for_storage_managementactive_iq_unified_managercommunications_unified_session_manageref600aOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2020-1968
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-4.80% / 90.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Sep, 2020 | 13:50
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 15:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Raccoon attack

The Raccoon attack exploits a flaw in the TLS specification which can lead to an attacker being able to compute the pre-master secret in connections which have used a Diffie-Hellman (DH) based ciphersuite. In such a case this would result in the attacker being able to eavesdrop on all encrypted communications sent over that TLS connection. The attack can only be exploited if an implementation re-uses a DH secret across multiple TLS connections. Note that this issue only impacts DH ciphersuites and not ECDH ciphersuites. This issue affects OpenSSL 1.0.2 which is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. OpenSSL 1.1.1 is not vulnerable to this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2w (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2v).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Oracle CorporationDebian GNU/LinuxFujitsu LimitedCanonical Ltd.OpenSSL
Product-ethernet_switch_es2-72_firmwarem10-1_firmwareethernet_switch_es1-24m10-4s_firmwareethernet_switch_es2-72ethernet_switch_tor-72m12-2_firmwareethernet_switch_es1-24_firmwarem10-4m12-1_firmwarem10-4sdebian_linuxpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsubuntu_linuxm10-1opensslm12-2s_firmwarem12-1m10-4_firmwareethernet_switch_es2-64_firmwareethernet_switch_es2-64ethernet_switch_tor-72_firmwarem12-2sm12-2jd_edwards_world_securityOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-203
Observable Discrepancy
CVE-2020-1967
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-53.34% / 98.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2020 | 13:45
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Segmentation fault in SSL_check_chain

Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jdedwardsFreeBSD FoundationFedora ProjectOracle CorporationTenable, Inc.Broadcom Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxopenSUSEOpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-freebsdjd_edwards_world_securitypeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsenterprise_manager_for_storage_managementopenssle-series_performance_analyzeractive_iq_unified_managerlog_correlation_enginemysql_connectorsleaponcommand_workflow_automationmysql_workbenchsnapcentersteelstore_cloud_integrated_storagehttp_servermysqldebian_linuxsmi-s_providermysql_enterprise_monitorfedoraenterpriseoneapplication_serverfabric_operating_systementerprise_manager_ops_centerenterprise_manager_base_platformoncommand_insightOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-476
NULL Pointer Dereference
CVE-2020-7043
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-2.46% / 82.69%
||
7 Day CHG+0.06%
Published-27 Feb, 2020 | 17:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in openfortivpn 1.11.0 when used with OpenSSL before 1.0.2. tunnel.c mishandles certificate validation because hostname comparisons do not consider '\0' characters, as demonstrated by a good.example.com\x00evil.example.com attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openfortivpn_projectn/aOpenSSLopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-opensslfedorabackports_sleopenfortivpnleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-7042
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.58% / 72.77%
||
7 Day CHG+0.04%
Published-27 Feb, 2020 | 17:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in openfortivpn 1.11.0 when used with OpenSSL 1.0.2 or later. tunnel.c mishandles certificate validation because the hostname check operates on uninitialized memory. The outcome is that a valid certificate is never accepted (only a malformed certificate may be accepted).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openfortivpn_projectn/aOpenSSLopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-opensslfedorabackports_sleopenfortivpnleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-908
Use of Uninitialized Resource
CVE-2020-7041
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.75% / 75.31%
||
7 Day CHG+0.04%
Published-27 Feb, 2020 | 17:29
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in openfortivpn 1.11.0 when used with OpenSSL 1.0.2 or later. tunnel.c mishandles certificate validation because an X509_check_host negative error code is interpreted as a successful return value.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openfortivpn_projectn/aOpenSSLopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-opensslfedorabackports_sleopenfortivpnleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1551
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-14.30% / 96.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Dec, 2019 | 17:20
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
rsaz_512_sqr overflow bug on x86_64

There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Canonical Ltd.Debian GNU/LinuxopenSUSEOpenSSLFedora ProjectOracle CorporationTenable, Inc.
Product-ubuntu_linuxpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsdebian_linuxopensslmysql_enterprise_monitorfedoralog_correlation_engineenterprise_manager_ops_centerleapOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-190
Integer Overflow or Wraparound
CVE-2019-1563
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-3.84% / 88.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2019 | 16:58
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 01:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Padding Oracle in PKCS7_dataDecode and CMS_decrypt_set1_pkey

In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very large number of messages to be decrypted, can recover a CMS/PKCS7 transported encryption key or decrypt any RSA encrypted message that was encrypted with the public RSA key, using a Bleichenbacher padding oracle attack. Applications are not affected if they use a certificate together with the private RSA key to the CMS_decrypt or PKCS7_decrypt functions to select the correct recipient info to decrypt. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-327
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
CWE ID-CWE-203
Observable Discrepancy
CVE-2019-1549
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-6.23% / 92.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2019 | 16:58
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Fork Protection

OpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-330
Use of Insufficiently Random Values
CVE-2019-1547
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-4.7||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.19% / 64.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2019 | 16:58
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ECDSA remote timing attack

Normally in OpenSSL EC groups always have a co-factor present and this is used in side channel resistant code paths. However, in some cases, it is possible to construct a group using explicit parameters (instead of using a named curve). In those cases it is possible that such a group does not have the cofactor present. This can occur even where all the parameters match a known named curve. If such a curve is used then OpenSSL falls back to non-side channel resistant code paths which may result in full key recovery during an ECDSA signature operation. In order to be vulnerable an attacker would have to have the ability to time the creation of a large number of signatures where explicit parameters with no co-factor present are in use by an application using libcrypto. For the avoidance of doubt libssl is not vulnerable because explicit parameters are never used. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CVE-2019-1552
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-3.3||LOW
EPSS-0.68% / 48.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jul, 2019 | 16:29
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows builds with insecure path defaults

OpenSSL has internal defaults for a directory tree where it can find a configuration file as well as certificates used for verification in TLS. This directory is most commonly referred to as OPENSSLDIR, and is configurable with the --prefix / --openssldir configuration options. For OpenSSL versions 1.1.0 and 1.1.1, the mingw configuration targets assume that resulting programs and libraries are installed in a Unix-like environment and the default prefix for program installation as well as for OPENSSLDIR should be '/usr/local'. However, mingw programs are Windows programs, and as such, find themselves looking at sub-directories of 'C:/usr/local', which may be world writable, which enables untrusted users to modify OpenSSL's default configuration, insert CA certificates, modify (or even replace) existing engine modules, etc. For OpenSSL 1.0.2, '/usr/local/ssl' is used as default for OPENSSLDIR on all Unix and Windows targets, including Visual C builds. However, some build instructions for the diverse Windows targets on 1.0.2 encourage you to specify your own --prefix. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1, 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 are affected by this issue. Due to the limited scope of affected deployments this has been assessed as low severity and therefore we are not creating new releases at this time. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1543
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-5.70% / 92.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Mar, 2019 | 21:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ChaCha20-Poly1305 with long nonces

ChaCha20-Poly1305 is an AEAD cipher, and requires a unique nonce input for every encryption operation. RFC 7539 specifies that the nonce value (IV) should be 96 bits (12 bytes). OpenSSL allows a variable nonce length and front pads the nonce with 0 bytes if it is less than 12 bytes. However it also incorrectly allows a nonce to be set of up to 16 bytes. In this case only the last 12 bytes are significant and any additional leading bytes are ignored. It is a requirement of using this cipher that nonce values are unique. Messages encrypted using a reused nonce value are susceptible to serious confidentiality and integrity attacks. If an application changes the default nonce length to be longer than 12 bytes and then makes a change to the leading bytes of the nonce expecting the new value to be a new unique nonce then such an application could inadvertently encrypt messages with a reused nonce. Additionally the ignored bytes in a long nonce are not covered by the integrity guarantee of this cipher. Any application that relies on the integrity of these ignored leading bytes of a long nonce may be further affected. Any OpenSSL internal use of this cipher, including in SSL/TLS, is safe because no such use sets such a long nonce value. However user applications that use this cipher directly and set a non-default nonce length to be longer than 12 bytes may be vulnerable. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1 and 1.1.0 are affected by this issue. Due to the limited scope of affected deployments this has been assessed as low severity and therefore we are not creating new releases at this time. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1c (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1b). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0k (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0j).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-330
Use of Insufficiently Random Values
CWE ID-CWE-327
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
CVE-2019-1559
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-17.14% / 96.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Feb, 2019 | 23:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 04:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
0-byte record padding oracle

If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Canonical Ltd.Palo Alto Networks, Inc.F5, Inc.Fedora ProjectOracle CorporationTenable, Inc.Red Hat, Inc.McAfee, LLCDebian GNU/LinuxopenSUSENode.js (OpenJS Foundation)OpenSSLNetApp, Inc.
Product-communications_diameter_signaling_routercommunications_unified_session_managerubuntu_linuxbig-ip_webacceleratora320_firmwarebig-ip_application_acceleration_managerpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsopensslbig-ip_policy_enforcement_managercloud_backupfas2720threat_intelligence_exchange_servervirtualization_hostbusiness_intelligenceoncommand_unified_manager_core_packagebig-ip_local_traffic_managersantricity_smi-s_providercommunications_performance_intelligence_centeragentsnapcentersteelstore_cloud_integrated_storageontap_select_deploysmi-s_providerfas2750_firmwareontap_select_deploy_administration_utilityhci_management_nodeenterprise_linux_workstationfedoraa220traffix_signaling_delivery_controllerenterprise_linux_desktopapi_gatewaycommunications_session_routerweb_gatewayleapendeca_serverservice_processorenterprise_linuxa320big-ip_domain_name_systemmysql_workbenchsolidfirebig-ip_edge_gatewaydebian_linuxbig-iq_centralized_managementmysql_enterprise_monitorjboss_enterprise_web_serversecure_global_desktopstorage_automation_storea220_firmwaresnapprotectoncommand_unified_managermysqlenterprise_manager_base_platformenterprise_linux_serverpan-osbig-ip_fraud_protection_servicefas2720_firmwarec190services_tools_bundlestoragegridhci_compute_nodebig-ip_application_security_managernode.jssnapdrivefas2750big-ip_access_policy_managercn1610_firmwarecommunications_session_border_controllerenterprise_manager_ops_centernessusoncommand_insightjd_edwards_world_securityaltavaulta800virtualizationhyper_converged_infrastructurecn1610active_iq_unified_managerbig-ip_global_traffic_managerbig-ip_analyticsoncommand_workflow_automationelement_softwarea800_firmwarebig-ip_link_controllerdata_exchange_layerclustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connectorc190_firmwarebig-ip_advanced_firewall_managerjd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolsOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-203
Observable Discrepancy
CVE-2019-0190
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-59.94% / 99.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jan, 2019 | 22:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A bug exists in the way mod_ssl handled client renegotiations. A remote attacker could send a carefully crafted request that would cause mod_ssl to enter a loop leading to a denial of service. This bug can be only triggered with Apache HTTP Server version 2.4.37 when using OpenSSL version 1.1.1 or later, due to an interaction in changes to handling of renegotiation attempts.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSLThe Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-http_serveropensslinstantis_enterprisetrackretail_xstore_point_of_servicehospitality_guest_accessenterprise_manager_ops_centerApache HTTP Server
CVE-2018-16395
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-10.71% / 95.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Nov, 2018 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in the OpenSSL library in Ruby before 2.3.8, 2.4.x before 2.4.5, 2.5.x before 2.5.2, and 2.6.x before 2.6.0-preview3. When two OpenSSL::X509::Name objects are compared using ==, depending on the ordering, non-equal objects may return true. When the first argument is one character longer than the second, or the second argument contains a character that is one less than a character in the same position of the first argument, the result of == will be true. This could be leveraged to create an illegitimate certificate that may be accepted as legitimate and then used in signing or encryption operations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxCanonical Ltd.RubyRed Hat, Inc.
Product-ubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxopensslenterprise_linuxrubyn/a
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • Next