Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in xt:Commerce 3.0.4 SP2.1 and possibly earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of Admins for requests that (1) set a New user to Admin via the cID parameter to a statusconfirm action in admin/customers.php and (2) grant permissions to users via the cID parameter to a save action in admin/accounting.php.

TypesetterCMS v5.1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which is exploited via a crafted POST request.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control Virtual Machine Management before 6.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

In the Reponsive Menu (free and Pro) WordPress plugins before 4.0.4, attackers could craft a request and trick an administrator into uploading a zip archive containing malicious PHP files. The attacker could then access those files to achieve remote code execution and further infect the targeted site.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Moodle 2.0.x before 2.0.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that mark the completion of (1) an activity or (2) a course.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index/manager/fileUpload in Public Knowledge Project Open Harvester Systems 2.3.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that upload PHP files.

All versions up to UKBB_WF820+_1.0.0B06 of ZTE WF820+ LTE Outdoor CPE product are impacted by Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability,which stems from the fact that WEB applications do not adequately verify whether requests come from trusted users. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to send unexpected requests to the server through the affected client.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins autonomiq Plugin 1.15 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL server using attacker-specified credentials.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index/manager/fileUpload in Public Knowledge Project Open Conference Systems 2.3.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that upload a PHP file.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index/manager/fileUpload in Public Knowledge Project Open Journal Systems 2.3.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that upload PHP files.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wordpress_sentinel.php in the Sentinel plugin 1.0.0 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of an administrator for requests that trigger snapshots.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in mod/wiki/ components in Moodle 2.0.x before 2.0.5 and 2.1.x before 2.1.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify wiki data.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in McAfee ePO (legacy) Cloud allows unauthenticated users to perform unintended ePO actions using an authenticated user's session via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Moodle 1.9.x before 1.9.11 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that modify an RSS feed in an RSS block.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SKYARC MTCMS before 5.252, and the MultiFileUploader 0.44 and earlier, DuplicateEntry 1.2 and earlier, MailPack 1.741 and earlier, and AutoTagging 0.08 and earlier plugins for Movable Type, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify data.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /ctrl in the web interface in HomeSeer HS2 2.5.0.20 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of admins for requests that execute arbitrary programs.

A vulnerability was found in CoreHR Core Portal up to 27.0.7. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 27.0.8 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Mingle Forum plugin 1.0.34 and possibly earlier for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) modify user privileges or (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management interface in FreeIPA before 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that make configuration changes.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Wuzly 2.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add an administrator, (2) perform cross-site scripting (XSS), (3) perform SQL injection, or have other unspecified impact via unknown vectors.

A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the administrator functions in WebsiteBaker 2.8.1 and earlier due to inadequate confirmation for sensitive transactions.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Express cart v1.1.16 allows attackers to add an administrator account, add discount code or other unspecified impacts.

In phpMyFAQ before 2.9.9, there is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in admin/stat.main.php.

A Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Advanced Electron Forums (AEF) through 1.0.9 due to inadequate confirmation for sensitive transactions in the administrator functions.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Post Revolution 0.8.0c-2 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests to (1) ajax-weblog-guardar.php, (2) verpost.php, (3) comments.php, or (4) perfil.php.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Best Practical Solutions RT before 3.8.12 and 4.x before 4.0.6 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

An issue was discovered in Eventum 3.5.0. CSRF in htdocs/manage/users.php allows creating another user with admin privileges.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cherokee-admin in Cherokee before 1.2.99 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences, as demonstrated by a crafted nickname field to vserver/apply.

A vulnerability in the web-based interface allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger actions on an affected system on behalf of another user (CSRF - Cross Site Request Forgery). This requires the victim to be tricked into clicking a malicious link or opening a malicious website while being logged in into the camera.

The package joplin before 2.3.2 are vulnerable to Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) due to missing CSRF checks in various forms.

In MIELE XGW 3000 ZigBee Gateway before 2.4.0, a malicious website visited by an authenticated admin user or a malicious mail is allowed to make arbitrary changes in the "admin panel" because there is no CSRF protection.

JForum v2.8.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via http://target_host:port/jforum-2.8.0/jforum.page, which allows attackers to arbitrarily add admin accounts.

An issue was discovered in the PushToWatch extension for MediaWiki through 1.35.1. The primary form did not implement an anti-CSRF token and therefore was completely vulnerable to CSRF attacks against onSkinAddFooterLinks in PushToWatch.php.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 5.12.0, 5.11.1, 5.10.2, 5.9.2, and 4.10.10. The login page allows CSRF.

JasperServer in JasperReports Server Community Project 3.7.0 and 3.7.1 uses a predictable _flowExecutionKey parameter, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a brute-force approach.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) in Samba 3.x before 3.5.10 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) shut down daemons, (2) start daemons, (3) add shares, (4) remove shares, (5) add printers, (6) remove printers, (7) add user accounts, or (8) remove user accounts, as demonstrated by certain start, stop, and restart parameters to the status program.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in SquirrelMail 1.4.21 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via vectors involving (1) the empty trash implementation and (2) the Index Order (aka options_order) page, a different issue than CVE-2010-4555.

A CVE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists that could allow an attacker to impersonate the user or carry out actions on their behalf when crafted malicious parameters are submitted in POST requests sent to the charging station web server. Affected Products: EVlink City EVC1S22P4 / EVC1S7P4 (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2 ), EVlink Parking EVW2 / EVF2 / EVP2PE (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2), and EVlink Smart Wallbox EVB1A (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2)

WooCommerce before 3.6.5, when it handles CSV imports of products, has a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) issue with resultant stored cross-site scripting (XSS) via includes/admin/importers/class-wc-product-csv-importer-controller.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control Performance Management before 6.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

An issue was discovered on NETGEAR WNR1000V4 1.1.0.54 devices. Multiple actions within the WNR1000V4 web management console are vulnerable to an unauthenticated GET request (exploitable directly or through CSRF), as demonstrated by the setup.cgi?todo=save_htp_account URI.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Translation Management module 6.x before 6.x-1.21 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 5.18.0, 5.17.2, 5.16.4, 5.15.4, and 5.9.7. CSRF can sometimes occur via a crafted web site for account takeover attacks.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in _ah/admin/interactive/execute (aka the Interactive Console) in the SDK Console (aka Admin Console) in the Google App Engine Python SDK before 1.5.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary Python code via the code parameter.

payment_manage.ajax.php and various *_manage.ajax.php in MFScripts YetiShare 3.5.2 through 4.5.4 directly insert values from the sSortDir_0 parameter into a SQL string. This allows an attacker to inject their own SQL and manipulate the query, typically extracting data from the database, aka SQL Injection. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-19732.

An issue was discovered in Joomla! 2.5.0 through 3.9.22. A missing token check in the emailexport feature of com_privacy causes a CSRF vulnerability.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Greenbone Security Assistant (GSA) before 2.0+rc3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that send email via an OMP request to OpenVAS Manager. NOTE: this issue can be leveraged to bypass authentication requirements for exploiting CVE-2011-0018.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aimluck Aipo before 4.0.4.0, and Aipo for ASP before 4.0.4.0, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify data.

An issue was discovered in Serpico (aka SimplE RePort wrIting and CollaboratiOn tool) 1.3.0. It does not use CSRF Tokens to mitigate against CSRF; it uses the Origin header (which must match the request origin). This is problematic in conjunction with XSS: one can escalate privileges from User level to Administrator.

A flaw in the WordPress plugin, WP Maintenance before 5.0.6, allowed attackers to enable a vulnerable site's maintenance mode and inject malicious code affecting site visitors. There was CSRF with resultant XSS.