Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2017-1000097

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-04 Oct, 2017 | 01:00
Updated At-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:24
Rejected At-
Credits

On Darwin, user's trust preferences for root certificates were not honored. If the user had a root certificate loaded in their Keychain that was explicitly not trusted, a Go program would still verify a connection using that root certificate.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:04 Oct, 2017 | 01:00
Updated At:16 Sep, 2024 | 19:24
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

On Darwin, user's trust preferences for root certificates were not honored. If the user had a root certificate loaded in their Keychain that was explicitly not trusted, a Go program would still verify a connection using that root certificate.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21msg/golang-dev/4NdLzS8sls8/uIz8QlnIBQAJ
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/33721/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18141
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21msg/golang-dev/4NdLzS8sls8/uIz8QlnIBQAJ
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/33721/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18141
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21msg/golang-dev/4NdLzS8sls8/uIz8QlnIBQAJ
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/33721/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18141
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21msg/golang-dev/4NdLzS8sls8/uIz8QlnIBQAJ
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/33721/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18141
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:05 Oct, 2017 | 01:29
Updated At:13 May, 2026 | 00:24

On Darwin, user's trust preferences for root certificates were not honored. If the user had a root certificate loaded in their Keychain that was explicitly not trusted, a Go program would still verify a connection using that root certificate.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

Go
golang
>>go>>Versions before 1.6.4(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Go
golang
>>go>>Versions from 1.7(inclusive) to 1.7.4(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18141cve@mitre.org
Issue Tracking
Third Party Advisory
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/33721/cve@mitre.org
Broken Link
https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21msg/golang-dev/4NdLzS8sls8/uIz8QlnIBQAJcve@mitre.org
N/A
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18141af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Issue Tracking
Third Party Advisory
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/33721/af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Broken Link
https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21msg/golang-dev/4NdLzS8sls8/uIz8QlnIBQAJaf854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18141
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Issue Tracking
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/33721/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Broken Link
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21msg/golang-dev/4NdLzS8sls8/uIz8QlnIBQAJ
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18141
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Issue Tracking
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/33721/
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Broken Link
Hyperlink: https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21msg/golang-dev/4NdLzS8sls8/uIz8QlnIBQAJ
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource: N/A

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

132Records found

CVE-2020-14039
Matching Score-10
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.43% / 63.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jul, 2020 | 15:43
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Go before 1.13.13 and 1.14.x before 1.14.5, Certificate.Verify may lack a check on the VerifyOptions.KeyUsages EKU requirements (if VerifyOptions.Roots equals nil and the installation is on Windows). Thus, X.509 certificate verification is incomplete.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGoopenSUSE
Product-goleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-33810
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 2.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Apr, 2026 | 01:06
Updated-20 Apr, 2026 | 18:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Case-sensitive excludedSubtrees name constraints cause Auth Bypass in crypto/x509

When verifying a certificate chain containing excluded DNS constraints, these constraints are not correctly applied to wildcard DNS SANs which use a different case than the constraint. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard libraryGo
Product-gocrypto/x509
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29923
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 48.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Aug, 2021 | 16:38
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Go before 1.17 does not properly consider extraneous zero characters at the beginning of an IP address octet, which (in some situations) allows attackers to bypass access control that is based on IP addresses, because of unexpected octal interpretation. This affects net.ParseIP and net.ParseCIDR.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOracle CorporationFedora ProjectGo
Product-gofedoratimesten_in-memory_databasen/a
CVE-2022-41716
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 2.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Nov, 2022 | 15:28
Updated-30 Oct, 2024 | 14:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Unsanitized NUL in environment variables on Windows in syscall and os/exec

Due to unsanitized NUL values, attackers may be able to maliciously set environment variables on Windows. In syscall.StartProcess and os/exec.Cmd, invalid environment variable values containing NUL values are not properly checked for. A malicious environment variable value can exploit this behavior to set a value for a different environment variable. For example, the environment variable string "A=B\x00C=D" sets the variables "A=B" and "C=D".

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard libraryGoMicrosoft Corporation
Product-gowindowssyscallos/exec
CVE-2019-16276
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-7.76% / 92.13%
||
7 Day CHG-2.08%
Published-30 Sep, 2019 | 18:40
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Go before 1.12.10 and 1.13.x before 1.13.1 allow HTTP Request Smuggling.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.Fedora ProjectDebian GNU/LinuxGoopenSUSERed Hat, Inc.
Product-debian_linuxdeveloper_toolscloud_insights_telegraf_agentopenshift_container_platformfedoraenterprise_linuxgoenterprise_linux_eusleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2022-2880
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 9.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Oct, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 16:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect sanitization of forwarded query parameters in net/http/httputil

Requests forwarded by ReverseProxy include the raw query parameters from the inbound request, including unparsable parameters rejected by net/http. This could permit query parameter smuggling when a Go proxy forwards a parameter with an unparsable value. After fix, ReverseProxy sanitizes the query parameters in the forwarded query when the outbound request's Form field is set after the ReverseProxy. Director function returns, indicating that the proxy has parsed the query parameters. Proxies which do not parse query parameters continue to forward the original query parameters unchanged.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard libraryGo
Product-gonet/http/httputil
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2022-23773
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Feb, 2022 | 00:16
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 03:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

cmd/go in Go before 1.16.14 and 1.17.x before 1.17.7 can misinterpret branch names that falsely appear to be version tags. This can lead to incorrect access control if an actor is supposed to be able to create branches but not tags.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.Go
Product-cloud_insights_telegraf_agentbeegfs_csi_drivergostoragegridkubernetes_monitoring_operatorn/a
CWE ID-CWE-436
Interpretation Conflict
CVE-2025-61729
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.02% / 5.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Dec, 2025 | 18:54
Updated-19 Dec, 2025 | 18:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Excessive resource consumption when printing error string for host certificate validation in crypto/x509

Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a malicious actor can result in excessive resource consumption.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard libraryGo
Product-gocrypto/x509
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-0601
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-94.09% / 99.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jan, 2020 | 23:11
Updated-29 Oct, 2025 | 14:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Known KEV||Action Due Date - 2022-05-03||Apply updates per vendor instructions.

A spoofing vulnerability exists in the way Windows CryptoAPI (Crypt32.dll) validates Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) certificates.An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using a spoofed code-signing certificate to sign a malicious executable, making it appear the file was from a trusted, legitimate source, aka 'Windows CryptoAPI Spoofing Vulnerability'.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GoMicrosoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_1709windows_10_1507windows_10_1909windows_server_1909windows_server_1803windows_10_1903windowswindows_10_1607windows_10_1809windows_server_2019gowindows_server_1903windows_server_2016windows_10_1803Windows ServerWindows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit SystemsWindows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based SystemsWindowsWindows 10 Version 1909 for 32-bit SystemsWindows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)Windows Server, version 1909 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based SystemsWindows 10 Version 1909 for ARM64-based SystemsWindows
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-34558
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.92% / 76.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jul, 2021 | 13:47
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The crypto/tls package of Go through 1.16.5 does not properly assert that the type of public key in an X.509 certificate matches the expected type when doing a RSA based key exchange, allowing a malicious TLS server to cause a TLS client to panic.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOracle CorporationNetApp, Inc.Fedora ProjectGo
Product-fedoragocloud_insights_telegraftridenttimesten_in-memory_databasestoragegridn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-42508
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.04% / 11.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2026 | 02:31
Updated-28 May, 2026 | 14:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Invoking auth bypass via unenforced @revoked status in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh/knownhosts

Previously, a revoked 'SignatureKey' belonging to a CA was not correctly checked for revocation. Now, both the 'key' and 'key.SignatureKey' are checked for @revoked.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-golang.org/x/cryptoGo
Product-cryptogolang.org/x/crypto/ssh/knownhosts
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-39828
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.03% / 10.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2026 | 02:31
Updated-02 Jun, 2026 | 16:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Invoking bypass of certificate restrictions in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh

When an SSH server authentication callback returned PartialSuccessError with non-nil Permissions, those permissions were silently discarded, potentially dropping certificate restrictions such as force-command after a second factor succeeded. Returning non-nil Permissions with PartialSuccessError now results in a connection error.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-golang.org/x/cryptoGo
Product-cryptogolang.org/x/crypto/ssh
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-39835
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.03% / 8.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2026 | 02:31
Updated-28 May, 2026 | 14:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Invoking server panic during CheckHostKey/Authenticate in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh

SSH servers which use CertChecker as a public key callback without setting IsUserAuthority or IsHostAuthority could be caused to panic by a client presenting a certificate. CertChecker now returns an error instead of panicking when these callbacks are nil.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-golang.org/x/cryptoGo
Product-cryptogolang.org/x/crypto/ssh
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-32281
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.02% / 6.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Apr, 2026 | 01:06
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Inefficient policy validation in crypto/x509

Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard libraryGo
Product-gocrypto/x509
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-27137
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.02% / 3.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Mar, 2026 | 21:28
Updated-21 Apr, 2026 | 14:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect enforcement of email constraints in crypto/x509

When verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate containing multiple email address constraints which share common local portions but different domain portions, these constraints will not be properly applied, and only the last constraint will be considered.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard libraryGo
Product-gocrypto/x509
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-27138
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.03% / 8.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Mar, 2026 | 21:28
Updated-21 Apr, 2026 | 14:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Panic in name constraint checking for malformed certificates in crypto/x509

Certificate verification can panic when a certificate in the chain has an empty DNS name and another certificate in the chain has excluded name constraints. This can crash programs that are either directly verifying X.509 certificate chains, or those that use TLS.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard libraryGo
Product-gocrypto/x509
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-68121
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.02% / 4.53%
||
7 Day CHG-0.00%
Published-05 Feb, 2026 | 17:48
Updated-29 Apr, 2026 | 14:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Unexpected session resumption in crypto/tls

During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and mutates the returned Config, or uses Config.GetConfigForClient. This can cause a client to resume a session with a server that it would not have resumed with during the initial handshake, or cause a server to resume a session with a client that it would not have resumed with during the initial handshake.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard libraryGo
Product-gocrypto/tls
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-7919
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.70% / 72.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2020 | 20:55
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Go before 1.12.16 and 1.13.x before 1.13.7 (and the crypto/cryptobyte package before 0.0.0-20200124225646-8b5121be2f68 for Go) allows attacks on clients (resulting in a panic) via a malformed X.509 certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.Fedora ProjectGoDebian GNU/Linux
Product-gocloud_insights_telegrafdebian_linuxfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-58188
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 1.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Oct, 2025 | 22:10
Updated-29 Jan, 2026 | 15:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Panic when validating certificates with DSA public keys in crypto/x509

Validating certificate chains which contain DSA public keys can cause programs to panic, due to a interface cast that assumes they implement the Equal method. This affects programs which validate arbitrary certificate chains.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard libraryGo
Product-gocrypto/x509
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-27536
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.56% / 68.83%
||
7 Day CHG-0.00%
Published-20 Apr, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 05:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Certificate.Verify in crypto/x509 in Go 1.18.x before 1.18.1 can be caused to panic on macOS when presented with certain malformed certificates. This allows a remote TLS server to cause a TLS client to panic.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.Go
Product-gomacosn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-16875
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.92% / 76.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The crypto/x509 package of Go before 1.10.6 and 1.11.x before 1.11.3 does not limit the amount of work performed for each chain verification, which might allow attackers to craft pathological inputs leading to a CPU denial of service. Go TLS servers accepting client certificates and TLS clients are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-[UNKNOWN]GoopenSUSE
Product-goleapgolang
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-61727
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Go Project
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Dec, 2025 | 19:37
Updated-18 Dec, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper application of excluded DNS name constraints when verifying wildcard names in crypto/x509

An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Go standard libraryGo
Product-gocrypto/x509
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-28362
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.71% / 72.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Nov, 2020 | 16:27
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Go before 1.14.12 and 1.15.x before 1.15.4 allows Denial of Service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.Fedora ProjectGo
Product-gocloud_insights_telegraf_agentfedoratridentn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-59353
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 17.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Sep, 2025 | 19:53
Updated-18 Sep, 2025 | 20:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Manager generates mTLS certificates for arbitrary IP addresses

Dragonfly is an open source P2P-based file distribution and image acceleration system. Prior to 2.1.0, a peer can obtain a valid TLS certificate for arbitrary IP addresses, effectively rendering the mTLS authentication useless. The issue is that the Manager’s Certificate gRPC service does not validate if the requested IP addresses “belong to” the peer requesting the certificate—that is, if the peer connects from the same IP address as the one provided in the certificate request. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-dragonflyossThe Linux Foundation
Product-dragonflydragonfly
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-862
Missing Authorization
CVE-2016-20011
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.84% / 75.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 May, 2021 | 20:09
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libgrss through 0.7.0 fails to perform TLS certificate verification when downloading feeds, allowing remote attackers to manipulate the contents of feeds without detection. This occurs because of the default behavior of SoupSessionSync.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME Project
Product-libgrssn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-12681
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.09% / 25.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jul, 2021 | 11:31
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Missing TLS certificate validation on 3xLogic Infinias eIDC32 devices through 3.4.125 allows an attacker to intercept/control the channel by which door lock policies are applied.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-3xlogicn/a
Product-infinias_eidc32infinias_eidc32_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-30134
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HCL Software
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HCL Software
CVSS Score-6.7||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 36.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Sep, 2024 | 14:50
Updated-30 Oct, 2025 | 18:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to an application modification vulnerability

The HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook executable (HTMO.exe) is being flagged as potentially Malicious Software or an Unrecognized Application.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-HCL Technologies Ltd.
Product-traveler_for_microsoft_outlookHCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlooktraveler
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-36377
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 28.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2021 | 12:11
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Fossil before 2.14.2 and 2.15.x before 2.15.2 often skips the hostname check during TLS certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fossil-scmn/aFedora Project
Product-fossilfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-3083
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 42.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Hive (JDBC + HiveServer2) implements SSL for plain TCP and HTTP connections (it supports both transport modes). While validating the server's certificate during the connection setup, the client in Apache Hive before 1.2.2 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 doesn't seem to be verifying the common name attribute of the certificate. In this way, if a JDBC client sends an SSL request to server abc.com, and the server responds with a valid certificate (certified by CA) but issued to xyz.com, the client will accept that as a valid certificate and the SSL handshake will go through.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-hiveApache Hive
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-10937
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 55.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Sep, 2019 | 15:07
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IMAPFilter through 2.6.12 does not validate the hostname in an SSL certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-imapfilter_projectn/aDebian GNU/LinuxopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-debian_linuxfedoraimapfilterbackports_sleleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-0534
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.95% / 76.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Aug, 2015 | 10:00
Updated-06 May, 2026 | 22:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite (MES) 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.3, RSA BSAFE Crypto-J before 6.2, RSA BSAFE SSL-J before 6.2, and RSA BSAFE SSL-C 2.8.9 and earlier do not enforce certain constraints on certificate data, which allows remote attackers to defeat a fingerprint-based certificate-blacklist protection mechanism by including crafted data within a certificate's unsigned portion, a similar issue to CVE-2014-8275.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDell Inc.
Product-bsafe_ssl-jbsafebsafe_ssl-cn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1132
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.30% / 53.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Shoplat App for iOS 1.10.00 through 1.18.00 does not properly verify SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-docomon/a
Product-shoplatn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-32574
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.80% / 74.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jul, 2021 | 17:28
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise 1.3.0 through 1.10.0 Envoy proxy TLS configuration does not validate destination service identity in the encoded subject alternative name. Fixed in 1.8.14, 1.9.8, and 1.10.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-consuln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-35389
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.02% / 7.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2026 | 20:11
Updated-09 Apr, 2026 | 20:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Bulwark Webmail S/MIME signature verification accepted self-signed certificates

Bulwark Webmail is a self-hosted webmail client for Stalwart Mail Server. Prior to 1.4.11, S/MIME signature verification did not validate the certificate trust chain (checkChain: false). Any email signed with a self-signed or untrusted certificate was displayed as having a valid signature. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.11.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-bulwarkmailbulwarkmail
Product-webmailwebmail
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36478
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.52% / 67.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). A NULL algorithm parameters entry looks identical to an array of REAL (size zero) and thus the certificate is considered valid. However, if the parameters do not match in any way, then the certificate should be considered invalid.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm LimitedDebian GNU/LinuxSiemens AG
Product-debian_linuxlogo\!_cmr2040_firmwaresimatic_rtu3031c_firmwaresimatic_rtu3030csimatic_rtu3041c_firmwaresimatic_rtu3041clogo\!_cmr2040simatic_rtu3000clogo\!_cmr2020simatic_rtu3031csimatic_rtu3000c_firmwarelogo\!_cmr2020_firmwaresimatic_rtu3030c_firmwarembed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-4680
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.38% / 59.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Apr, 2017 | 17:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

FreeRADIUS 2.2.x before 2.2.8 and 3.0.x before 3.0.9 does not properly check revocation of intermediate CA certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aFreeRADIUSSUSE
Product-freeradiuslinux_enterprise_serverlinux_enterprise_software_development_kitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-3336
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Amazon
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Amazon
CVSS Score-8.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 3.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Mar, 2026 | 21:15
Updated-11 Mar, 2026 | 17:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PKCS7_verify Certificate Chain Validation Bypass in AWS-LC

Improper certificate validation in PKCS7_verify() in AWS-LC allows an unauthenticated user to bypass certificate chain verification when processing PKCS7 objects with multiple signers, except the final signer. Customers of AWS services do not need to take action. Applications using AWS-LC should upgrade to AWS-LC version 1.69.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-amazonAWS
Product-aws-lc-sysaws_libcryptoAWS-LC
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-33753
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 1.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Apr, 2026 | 14:54
Updated-21 Apr, 2026 | 18:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in rfc3161-client

rfc3161-client is a Python library implementing the Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP) described in RFC 3161. Prior to 1.0.6, an Authorization Bypass vulnerability in rfc3161-client's signature verification allows any attacker to impersonate a trusted TimeStamping Authority (TSA). By exploiting a logic flaw in how the library extracts the leaf certificate from an unordered PKCS#7 bag of certificates, an attacker can append a spoofed certificate matching the target common_name and Extended Key Usage (EKU) requirements. This tricks the library into verifying these authorization rules against the forged certificate while validating the cryptographic signature against an actual trusted TSA (such as FreeTSA), thereby bypassing the intended TSA authorization pinning entirely. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.6.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-trailofbitstrailofbits
Product-rfc3161-clientrfc3161-client
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-34580
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.3||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.01% / 1.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Apr, 2026 | 21:12
Updated-17 Apr, 2026 | 20:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Botan has a certificate authentication bypass due to trust anchor confusion

Botan is a C++ cryptography library. In 3.11.0, the function Certificate_Store::certificate_known had a misleading name; it would return true if any certificate in the store had a DN (and subject key identifier, if set) matching that of the argument. It did not check that the cert it found and the cert it was passed were actually the same certificate. In 3.11.0 an extension of path validation logic was made which assumed that certificate_known only returned true if the certificates were in fact identical. The impact is that if an end entity certificate is presented, and its DN (and subject key identifier, if set) match that of any trusted root, the end entity certificate is accepted immediately as if it itself were a trusted root. , This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-botan_projectrandombit
Product-botanbotan
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-0294
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.43% / 62.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 15:12
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 04:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

GnuTLS before 3.3.13 does not validate that the signature algorithms match when importing a certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GnuTLSRed Hat, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxGNU
Product-debian_linuxgnutlsenterprise_linuxGnuTLS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29726
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 May, 2022 | 16:25
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3 and IBM Secure External Authentication Server 6.0.3 does not properly ensure that a certificate is actually associated with the host due to improper validation of certificates. IBM X-Force ID: 201104.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-sterling_secure_proxysecure_external_authentication_serverSterling Secure ProxySecure External Authentication Server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-7143
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.35% / 57.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2019 | 13:04
Updated-25 Nov, 2024 | 18:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Python Twisted 14.0 trustRoot is not respected in HTTP client

Action-Not Available
Vendor-twistedn/a
Product-twistedn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29495
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 28.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 May, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Nim stdlib httpClient does not validate peer certificates by default

Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. In Nim standard library before 1.4.2, httpClient SSL/TLS certificate verification was disabled by default. Users can upgrade to version 1.4.2 to receive a patch or, as a workaround, set "verifyMode = CVerifyPeer" as documented.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nim-langnim-lang
Product-nimsecurity
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-27820
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.07% / 21.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2025 | 11:44
Updated-04 Jun, 2025 | 11:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache HttpComponents: PSL (Public Suffix List) validation bypass

A bug in PSL validation logic in Apache HttpClient 5.4.x disables domain checks, affecting cookie management and host name verification. Discovered by the Apache HttpClient team. Fixed in the 5.4.3 release

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-Apache HttpComponents
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-2901
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Nov, 2019 | 22:02
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 10:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

wolfssl before 3.2.0 does not properly issue certificates for a server's hostname.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-3451
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.33% / 80.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Aug, 2017 | 18:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenFire XMPP Server before 3.10 accepts self-signed certificates, which allows remote attackers to perform unspecified spoofing attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-igniterealtimen/a
Product-openfiren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-2902
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Nov, 2019 | 22:05
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 10:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

wolfssl before 3.2.0 does not properly authorize CA certificate for signing other certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29653
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 26.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Apr, 2021 | 16:41
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise 1.5.1 and newer, under certain circumstances, may exclude revoked but unexpired certificates from the CRL. Fixed in 1.5.8, 1.6.4, and 1.7.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-vaultn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25636
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect trust validation of signature with ambiguous KeyInfo children

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationFedora Project
Product-fedoralibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2013-7450
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 51.51%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Pulp before 2.3.0 uses the same the same certificate authority key and certificate for all installations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pulpprojectn/a
Product-pulpn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found